quick question about tbbeta and tbudl

[Drago]

just curious if there is a way to extract the .msg and re-import them
into the mail folder like the tbot list?

-- 
Check book: a book with a unhappy ending.

XanaNews 1.16.4.6




Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

V3 issues

[Lynn]

Hi Batters ...

OK, now I'm annoyed. My MAPI account got so fouled up that
upon discovering that Dovecot would do POP3, I changed
Dovecot over. That meant I had to set up a new account, as
I couldn't find a way to convert my MAPI account to POP.
OK, que sera sera. The mail was gone anyway, as nearly as
I could tell, and none was critical.

However, the next thing that happened when I reopened TB
was that none of my sig files would work. I checked the
paths. The files are there. I dinked with it, but I can't
find the places where the templates are stored (I did
check account.cfg and so on, but they look fine, those
that can be looked at) and I even went through the
registry, entry by entry. I rebooted the machine. No sig
files.

So I thought, OK, I'll back it all up, deinstall and
reinstall. A pain, but that worked before. And guess what?
no deinstaller! Not in the TB folder, and not in the WIN
control panel .. the 'remove' button in the deinstaller in
WIN is greyed out!

So now what? Do I just delete it and manually strip the
reg file?

tia

Lynn



 < The system cannot find the file specified (D:\TheBat\CCTLsig.txt) >
TBv.3.0
NT5 SP4



Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: Handle expansion?

[David Earl]

Hi Roelof,

RO> Hallo David,

RO> On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 17:29:13 +0200GMT (10-9-2004, 17:29 +0200, where I
RO> live), you wrote:

DE>> I suspect that I'll have to do a (b)CC to me,

RO> That seems to be the only option, I think. Then again, when your lists
RO> have logical names it's kind of evident which contacts you're
RO> addressing.

Some of my lists are "dynamic". Perhaps the worst is the organization
of our little impromptu bowling group. X is on vacation & shouldn't
get messages, Y already said "Can't this month", etc. and they get
"hacked off" at me, if I don't remove them from the list. I'd like to
know, who actually got what. I kinda doubt there's a freeware ListServ
running around, which can tie the addresses to calender ("in date
range do not send to X" type of thing), but I'm open to suggestions.

The other part is for filtering/sorting. I like "project"-folders for
all messages related to a project (sent & received). The sorting is in
place based on "Address Group contains sender/recipient", but the
"Group " messages aren't sorted into those folders. If the Group
 could be stored expanded, then the existing rules would handle
them "properly", too, instead of leaving them in my "Sent Mail"
folder. Maybe I've setup the rules wrong?

-- 
Thanks,
David
Win][k sp4
TheBat 3.0



Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Regular expression help - a simple filter - Argh!!!

[Bill McCarthy]

On Fri 10-Sep-04 3:04pm -0400, Stuart Moore wrote:

> Guys, thanks for suggestions.

>>> Although difficult to do exactly what you want, you can come pretty
>>> close with:

>>> \*?\bist-?d?\b

> For example, the following subject lines are not
> matched (I also changed the pattern to have a capital D in
> it just in case):

In v3, I believe, regex is caseless - you don't have to
worry about case.

>   Re: *ist D for me
>   Re: *ist (35mm) custom functions & 360FGZ flash
>   Re: HELP - Firmware 1.11 for *ist D
>   *ist D purchased on a whim
>   RE: ENABLED limited ist D
>   RE: Batteries for the istD
>   RE: IST D and Pentax-F 1.7x AF adapter
>   Re: IST-D discontinued?
>   Paint Shop Pro 9 built in RAW support for *ist D
>   istD price change

Hmm, using RegEx Test, hits were found in all of those
lines.

> Also might I be right in thinking that in principle the
> * marks a word boundary anyway so \*? is redundant and -?
> is also redundant as I am also interested in "ist" matches
> and - marks a word boundary.

It is because * and - are word boundaries, I mentioned that
it is "difficult to do exactly what you want.

\*? is redundant if you're not going to use the result.
That is "*ist" be matched including it.  "ist" will be
matched in "*ist" if you don't include it.

But the ending isn't included properly anyway.  So simply

\bistd?\b

is probably good enough :-)

BTW, anyone trying this with a non-caseless implementation
should use:

(?s)\bistd?\b

-- 
Best regards,
Bill




Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: [News] Logos for mobile phones

[aceman]

>> There is a new section on our web-site - "Logos for mobile phones"

> Pity there isn't a section:- "Fixing bugs in Bat!"

Indeed.

Pity I can't seem to get off their mailing list either   :(

-- 



Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: [News] Logos for mobile phones

[John Phillips]

Hi ritlabs-news,
On Fri, 10 Sep 2004, at 18:04:19 [GMT+0300] (which was Sat, 1:04:19
Australian Eastern Time) you wrote:



> There is a new section on our web-site - "Logos for mobile phones"


Pity there isn't a section:- "Fixing bugs in Bat!"

-- 
John Phillips, Sydney, Australia

Using The Bat! v3.0 on Windows XP 5.1 Build  2600
Service Pack 2 

What garlic is to salad, insanity is to art. 



Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: Regular expression help - a simple filter - Argh!!!

[Stuart Moore]

Guys, thanks for suggestions.

>> Although difficult to do exactly what you want, you can come pretty
>> close with:

>> \*?\bist-?d?\b

DG> Wouldn't:\b*?ist-?\b ie: \b   word boundary
DG>  *?   0 or 1 asterisk
DG>  ist
DG>  -?   0 or 1 dash
DG>  d?   0 or 1 d
DG>  \b   word boundary
DG> work better?




DG> Using: The Bat! v2.12.00, BayesIt! 0.5.9,
DG>MyMacros 1.11, gMacrosPlugin 0.80
DG>Windows 2000 v5.0 - Build 2195 - Service Pack 4

(Dan - I assume you accidentally left "d?" out?)

I tried these already and the do not work for all messages. This is what is driving me 
bonkers.

For example, the following subject lines are not matched (I also changed the pattern 
to have a capital D in it just in case):

Re: *ist D for me
Re: *ist (35mm) custom functions & 360FGZ flash
Re: HELP - Firmware 1.11 for *ist D
*ist D purchased on a whim
RE: ENABLED limited ist D
RE: Batteries for the istD
RE: IST D and Pentax-F 1.7x AF adapter
Re: IST-D discontinued?
Paint Shop Pro 9 built in RAW support for *ist D
istD price change

Also might I be right in thinking that in principle the * marks a word boundary anyway 
so \*? is redundant and -? is also redundant as I am also interested in "ist" matches 
and - marks a word boundary. It may be a red herring, but it also seems to me that 
with \b at the end, subject lines ending with ist are not matched for some reason I do 
not understand.

I take it that the default setting for matching is already caseless in The Bat as you 
have not included (?i) instructions or case alternatives?

Thanks for trying. Any more thoughts?

-- 
Stuart  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"if you are not confused : you are misinformed



Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Charset for received mail

[Annette Mangels]

Thomas wrote [10.09.04]:

> When a message in Thai arrive, it's just high-ASCII European-language
> goobledigook. I need to right-click on the message, choose Charset /
> Thai, and the message displays correctly. Next time I open the
> message, it will display correctly in Thai.

Thomas, why not filter your Thai-Mails into a folder adding a Color
Group with your Thai-Charset while filtering (Sorting Office ->
actions). May be you must adjust the CharSet inside this folder
(rightclicking on a mail) and set this to default.

I'm doing this with Greek Mail and it works fine for me.

--
Annette
TB!2.12.00 ~ Windows 2000 5.0 Service Pack 4 (build 2195)







Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Regular expression help - a simple filter - Argh!!!

[Dan Grunberg]

Fri, 10 Sep 2004 13:05:51 -0500 (2:05 PM EDT here) Bill McCarthy wrote:

>> I want to find any posts that have any of the following complete
>> strings (case is not relevant):

>> *ist
>> *istd
>> *ist-d
>> ist
>> istd
>> ist-d

> Although difficult to do exactly what you want, you can come pretty
> close with:

> \*?\bist-?d?\b

Wouldn't:\b*?ist-?\b ie: \b   word boundary
 *?   0 or 1 asterisk
 ist
 -?   0 or 1 dash
 d?   0 or 1 d
 \b   word boundary
work better?




Using: The Bat! v2.12.00, BayesIt! 0.5.9,
   MyMacros 1.11, gMacrosPlugin 0.80
   Windows 2000 v5.0 - Build 2195 - Service Pack 4

-- 

Daniel A. Grunberg   Kensington, Maryland, USA
homepage: www.nyx.net/~dgrunber/



Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Regular expression help - a simple filter - Argh!!!

[Bill McCarthy]

On Fri 10-Sep-04 6:12am -0400, Stuart Moore wrote:

> I want to find any posts that have any of the following
> complete strings (case is not relevant):
>
> *ist
> *istd
> *ist-d
> ist
> istd
> ist-d

Although difficult to do exactly what you want, you can come
pretty close with:

\*?\bist-?d?\b

-- 
Best regards,
Bill




Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Handle expansion?

[Roelof Otten]

Hallo David,

On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 17:29:13 +0200GMT (10-9-2004, 17:29 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:

DE> With groups, I can set the To: field to "GroupName ". When that
DE> eMail is stored in my system, the To: field is set to GroupName. Is
DE> there a setting, so that TB will expand the To: and actually show the
DE> eMail addresses behind GroupName?

Not that I'm aware of.

DE> I suspect that I'll have to do a (b)CC to me,

That seems to be the only option, I think. Then again, when your lists
have logical names it's kind of evident which contacts you're
addressing.

-- 
Groetjes, Roelof

The Bat! 3.0.0.11
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1
1 pop3 account, server on LAN

Disclaimer: Any opinion stated in this message is not necessarily shared by my budgies 
or rabbits.


pgpg4hAWHrtb7.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: Virtual folder - Source Folder

[Joe]

Hello Michael,
--
Friday, September 10, 2004, 12:17:51 PM, you wrote:

> Hi Joe and list,

> On Friday, September 10, 2004 at 11:58:53 GMT -0400 (which was 17:58
> where I live) Joe wrote (at least in parts) and made these valuable
> points on the subject of "Virtual folder -  Source Folder":

> Yes. You can select a view mode for the VF in which you include the
> column "folder".

Daa!!!  How stupid of me.  I didn't even check the columns.
Thanks..

-- 
Best regards,
 Joe





Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Virtual folder - Source Folder

[Michael Geyer]

Hi Joe and list,

On Friday, September 10, 2004 at 11:58:53 GMT -0400 (which was 17:58
where I live) Joe wrote (at least in parts) and made these valuable
points on the subject of "Virtual folder -  Source Folder":



> Hello,
>  Is there a way to tell what folder the message is really in when you
>  use a virtual folder?

Yes. You can select a view mode for the VF in which you include the
column "folder".

-- 
Regards
Michael

powered by The BAT! 3.0.0.11, Useless Macro Collection 1.8.845 beta, and MyMacros 1.11
with usual problems of Windows XP  Pro 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2



Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Virtual folder - Source Folder

[Joe]

Hello,
 Is there a way to tell what folder the message is really in when you
 use a virtual folder?



Using The Bat! v3.0.0.8 on Windows XP 5.1 Build  2600
Service Pack 1

-- 
Best regards,
 Joe



Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Handle expansion?

[David Earl]

Hi All,

With groups, I can set the To: field to "GroupName ". When that
eMail is stored in my system, the To: field is set to GroupName. Is
there a setting, so that TB will expand the To: and actually show the
eMail addresses behind GroupName? I suspect that I'll have to do a
(b)CC to me, but if there's another workaround, I'd like to see that.
I've looked in the mail archive, but can't find anything related.

-- 
TIA,
David
Win][k sp4
TheBat 3.0



Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: GnuPG Key Manager and The Bat

[Costas Papadopoulos]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Friday, September 10, 2004, 3:57:22 PM, I wrote! (possibly edited):

>> Peter, do you have just one signing key?  It's been quite a while
>> since I tried to use GPG from within TB!, but I couldn't get it to
>> work at all.

> I get this message when I try and sign+encrypt -

> gpg: 2FE8DB89: There is no indication that this key really belongs to the owner
> gpg: [stdin]: sign+encrypt failed: unusable public key

> and the message isn't sent.

I  found  the  answer to this one. I used GPGKeys and added the option
"always-trust". This is done with the necessary caveats of course, but
in any case it does do the encrypt and sign action.

- --
Best regards,
 Costas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3-nr1 (Windows XP)

iD8DBQFBQcVwnGLgj4bhmZcRAp72AJ9aU5Bmq/i+L/ClJN30YpDL4dvXUQCfYV6i
vecWqoK/BP8jxP4J3qrXMw0=
=uymK
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Charset for received mail

[Thomas Fernandez]

Hello Peter,

On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 16:11:17 +0200 GMT (10/09/2004, 21:11 +0700 GMT),
Peter Fjelsten wrote:

TF>> Where do I find - in the shortcut editor - the context menu that
TF>> comes up when I right-click in a message body?

PF> Use the "windows context menu key" (or ), hit "h" and then
PF> "t" for Thai.

I will try this tomorrow in the office. However, it looks like more
gymnastics than the RMB route. Plus, I will have to click into the
message body too.

Is it not possible to set up a shortkey within TB, as I have done with
other menu items?

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

If flying is so safe, why do they call the airport the 'terminal'?

Message reply created with The Bat! 2.12.02
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build  A 





Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Obtaining Latest Release

[Marck D Pearlstone]

Dear Joe,

@10-Sep-2004, 10:15 -0400 (10-Sep 15:15 UK time) Joe [J] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:

J>  How do I get the latest releases.  I noticed that it's up to 3.0.0.11.

That is a beta release and can be obtained once you are a registered
beta tester. Please see the instructions on the TBUDLInfo concerning
joining the TB! beta team.

-- 
Cheers --  //.arck  D Pearlstone --List moderator and fellow end user
TB! v3.0.0.11 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 2
'

pgpVW9uVRUoGI.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Obtaining Latest Release

[Joe]

Hello,
 How do I get the latest releases.  I noticed that it's up to 3.0.0.11.


Using The Bat! v3.0.0.8 on Windows XP 5.1 Build  2600
Service Pack 1


Best regards,
 Joe



Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Charset for received mail

[Thomas Fernandez]

Hello TBUDL,

In the office, I receive mails in English and in Thai. I use the RTV.

When a message in Thai arrive, it's just high-ASCII European-language
goobledigook. I need to right-click on the message, choose Charset /
Thai, and the message displays correctly. Next time I open the
message, it will display correctly in Thai.

While I'm still annoyed that I have to go through the procedure once
each time I receive a new message (why does TB not use the right
decoding right way?), I tried to set up a hotkey so as to not have to
right-click. I looked through the shortcut editor (Alt-F12), and there
is one Encoding entry, but it does not include Thai. I also think it
refers to the editor and not to the viewer.

Where do I find - in the shortcut editor - the context menu that comes
up when I right-click in a message body? By mouse, I go to Charset and
then choose Thai. I think I'm overlooking the correct context menu
in the shortcut editor.

-- 
Thanks,

Thomas.



Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

displaying and writing arabic fonts in bat 3

[raed]

Hi all,

how do i add char set support to display and write arabic correctly
(from right to left) in the bat v3

  



Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Charset for received mail

[Peter Fjelsten]

Thomas,

On 10-09-2004 16:02, you [TF] wrote in
:
TF> Where do I find - in the shortcut editor - the context menu that
TF> comes up when I right-click in a message body?

This one is for Allie:

Use the "windows context menu key" (or ), hit "h" and then
"t" for Thai.

-- 
 Best regards   
 Peter Fjelsten
 3.0.0.11 
 Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1





Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: GnuPG Key Manager and The Bat

[Costas Papadopoulos]

Hello Joseph,
Thursday, September 9, 2004, 11:09:46 PM, you wrote (possibly edited):
> On Thu, 09 Sep 2004 20:05:47 GMT, Peter Meyns wrote:

>> I find TB!'s implemented support of GnuPG quite sufficient. I have
>> GPGShell installed here, but I rarely use it.

> Peter, do you have just one signing key?  It's been quite a while 
> since I tried to use GPG from within TB!, but I couldn't get it to 
> work at all.

I get this message when I try and sign+encrypt -

gpg: 2FE8DB89: There is no indication that this key really belongs to the owner
gpg: [stdin]: sign+encrypt failed: unusable public key

and the message isn't sent.

-- 
Best regards,
 Costas



Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Regular expression help - a simple filter - Argh!!!

[Stuart Moore]

I need help with a filter using a regular expression in v3. I have tried many many 
times and failed completely. I think I am following the rules but The Bat does not 
seem to follow them.I am not experienced in PERL so hope I am just being very ignorant.

I want to find any posts that have any of the following complete strings (case is not 
relevant):

*ist
*istd
*ist-d
ist
istd
ist-d

(In case you are wondering, the ist refers to a particular Pentax camera and I want to 
filter out messages about this camera from a broader mailing list.)

I do, of course, want to avoid matching on any longer words that have ist or istd in 
them (beginning, end or middle).

Firstly, searches on "message source" do not seem to work at all. Anything in the 
regular expression other than a simple string seems to cause no messages to be parsed. 
I have therefore had to use the same regular expression twice linked with an OR to 
search both "subject" and "text".

Secondly, many many attempts seem to fail if the string falls at the end of the 
subject line.

I thought something like this would do the job:

((?i)\b\*?istd?\b)

which seems to do the trick in The Regex Coach. (I note I can drop \* as the * marks a 
word boundary anyway.Similarly, if I get to a - then I have found a match and do not 
need to check for -d.)

However, The Bat does not seem to like the (?i) construction so I have replaced this 
thus:

\b[iI][sS][tT][dD]?\b

Still very limited joy. A few messages are selected but nowhere near as many as should 
be. (I have about 6000 messages to search around 2000 of which should be targeted.)

Please can anyone point me in the right direction. I am getting very very frustrated 
and do not find The Bat's help at all useful. (It does not look like it has been 
updated for version 3 either.)

TIA.  

-- 
Stuart  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"if you are not confused : you are misinformed"



Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Filter questions/problems

[Mic Cullen]

On Friday, September 10, 2004 @ 6:57:21 PM, Roelof Otten wrote:

[snips]

SVD>> Recently I upgraded from v2.12 to v3.0 (I never used beta
SVD>> versions). Now I suspect the conversion of my old filters to the
SVD>> NFS went not as it should.

Roelof> You're not the only one with that problem. v3's conversion went rather
Roelof> well, but that's not the same as totally flawless on all systems.

Yes :-)

Roelof> Furthermore some filters (especially the more complex ones) acted a
Roelof> bit different than what might have been expected.

FWIW, I ended up deleting all my old filters and rebuilding everything, as it
was easier than stuffing around with the old ones and fixing the problems
caused by conversion. I used the opportunity to reorganise my filter structure
using the new sub-filters, so I managed to justify it a bit that way...

Roelof>  However on the beta list we see a lot of improvement. (And every now
Roelof> and then a bit of regression.)

And, at times, bizarre behaviour where the filters work when you go to bed,
and don't when you get up. Hard to troubleshoot that :-) I've rebuilt filters
several times (identically) to get them to work again.

-- 

cheers, Mic (reply address works)
"Try not to become a man of success but rather try to become a man of value."
Albert Einstein




Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Filter questions/problems

[Roelof Otten]

Hallo Sander,

On Wed, 8 Sep 2004 17:22:11 +0200GMT (8-9-2004, 17:22 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:

SVD> Recently I upgraded from v2.12 to v3.0 (I never used beta
SVD> versions). Now I suspect the conversion of my old filters to the
SVD> NFS went not as it should.

You're not the only one with that problem. v3's conversion went rather
well, but that's not the same as totally flawless on all systems.
Furthermore some filters (especially the more complex ones) acted a
bit different than what might have been expected. However on the beta
list we see a lot of improvement. (And every now and then a bit of
regression.)

SVD> It seems some messages get filtered based on a rule which I
SVD> already altered before the upgrade. I cannot verify which filter
SVD> rule it uses, it concerns a "Read messages" filter and apparently
SVD> these aren't logged.

Currently your only option seems is to check your read filters one by
one whether they could have caused your problems. Especially for vread
filters this should be easy, because of them being converted with
their source folder present. (I think to remember something like that,
don't use read filters myself)

Checking your filters won't hurt anyway. After the upgrade I've done
some weeding on filters that I didn't use anymore. (unsubbed mailing
lists and so on) and done some re-sculpting of filters using the
possibilities of the NFS (no more 'dot in headers and sender in AB
group', but only 'sender in AB group')

SVD> This leads to my second question:
SVD> The incoming mail filter actions are logged in the account log. But is it
SVD> not possible to log all the other kinds of filter actions (read, sent, etc.)
SVD> as well?

I think that would be a nice feature

SVD> I am using The Bat! about 4.5 years now and my filter collection has become
SVD> quite large. Sometimes I am puzzled which filter it is using, then a logfile
SVD> would be helpful.

Another option would be to regularly check your sorting office,
carefully fine tuning it and cutting dead wood. I'm doing that at
least twice a year and generally I know what filter caught a message
when I'm seeing something unexpected. I guess that's because I strive
to keep my filters as simple as possible, and I keep my 86 incoming
filters structured together, first mailing lists, then AB groups the
the rest and I try to keep them mutually exclusive, so the sequence
doesn't matter a lot. (Totally mutually exclusive can't be done, since
I've got some contacts in multiple AB groups and I've got filters for
almost all of them.)

SVD> Third question (also about the NFS):
SVD> When using "Address groups" in a filter rule, is manually typing the name of
SVD> the group the only way to select it? In the old filter system you could just
SVD> select it from a dialog box. And what if I want to select multiple groups?
SVD> Do I type "Group1+Group2" or "Group1,Group2" or ... ?

Multiple groups should be done as: bsv+bsvbestuur+bsvintern+bsvextern
I've checked this by reverting to an older version of TB (still using
the OFS) created a new filter with multiple AB groups, moved my
account.srb (NFS file) to a save location, upgraded back and checked
the new filter. I guess that would be a way to create them. ;-) Create
a new old filter convert it, paste the filter to a text editor, close
TB, restore the account.srb open TB and paste your new filter from the
text editor.
I suppose typing the handles is easier.

SVD> Lot of questions... I hope you can help me.

Not really.

-- 
Groetjes, Roelof

The Bat! 3.0.0.11
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1
1 pop3 account, server on LAN

Disclaimer: Any opinion stated in this message is not necessarily shared by my budgies 
or rabbits.



Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Filter questions/problems

[Alexander S. Kunz]

Hello Sander van den Berg & everyone else

10-Sep-2004 11:21, you wrote:

SvdB>> I have some questions and a problem concerning the NFS.

> In two days not a single reply... :boohoo:

:-)

...the NFS is currently discussed a *lot* on the beta mailinglist. The v3
release version had bugs which are currently being resolved one after the
other.

As for you suggestion of "address book group" selection, I'd say that
should be formed into a feature request (its a useful idea, indeed).

-- 
Best regards,
 Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981)
 using v3.0.0.11 on Windows XP Pro Service Pack 2

DP2: "Mind Tranceference Control" by Pete Namlook & Bill Laswell
 from 'Psychonavigation 3'



Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Pop -> IMAP

[Peter Fjelsten]

Michael,

On 10-09-2004 11:38, you [MW] wrote in
:
MW> There must be an easier way: I have about 9000 messages in several
MW> folders.

There _should_ be, but AFAIR, this is more or less the only method that
works at the moment.

Try looking through TBBeta (on Gmane if you aren't subscribed).

-- 
 Best regards   
 Peter Fjelsten
 3.0.0.11 
 Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1





Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: Pop -> IMAP

[Michael Wagner]

Hi,

There must be an easier way: I have about 9000 messages in several
folders.
I want to keep the folder structure...

Viele Grüße
Michael Wagner

Call A CD - Ihr persönlicher Downloadservice und CD-Shop
Im Web www.callacd.com oder per Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Friday, September 10, 2004, 11:23:57 AM, you wrote:

PF> Michael,

PF> On 10-09-2004 11:30, you [MW] wrote in
PF> :
MW>> Is there an easy way to convert the account to imap and specially to
MW>> transfer all local folders to the imap server?

PF> I believe the preferred way is to export all messages as .msg and import
PF> them into the IMAP account.




Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Pop -> IMAP

[Peter Fjelsten]

Michael,

On 10-09-2004 11:30, you [MW] wrote in
:
MW> Is there an easy way to convert the account to imap and specially to
MW> transfer all local folders to the imap server?

I believe the preferred way is to export all messages as .msg and import
them into the IMAP account.

-- 
 Best regards   
 Peter Fjelsten
 3.0.0.11 
 Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1





Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Filter questions/problems

[Sander van den Berg]

On 8-9-2004, 17:22, Sander van den Berg wrote:

SvdB> I have some questions and a problem concerning the NFS.
:pacsnip:

In two days not a single reply... :boohoo:

-- 
Best regards,
Sander van den Berg
:nlflag: 

The Bat! v3.0
Windows XP Service Pack 1



Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Pop -> IMAP

[Michael Wagner]

Hi,

I am evaluating the BatPost mail server and I want to test it with a
copy of my main account.

Is there an easy way to convert the account to imap and specially to
transfer all local folders to the imap server?

Thanks

Viele Grüße
Michael Wagner

Call A CD - Ihr persönlicher Downloadservice und CD-Shop
Im Web www.callacd.com oder per Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

[OT] BatPost

[Michael Wagner]

Hi,

Does anyone of you use the BatPost mail server?
Do you know where I can some nice howtos? The manual isnt very
helpfull...

Thanks

Viele Grüße
Michael Wagner

Call A CD - Ihr persönlicher Downloadservice und CD-Shop
Im Web www.callacd.com oder per Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Version3 ?!/Foxmail

[Alexander S. Kunz]

Hello Mica Mijatovic & everyone else

10-Sep-2004 01:16, you wrote:

> No! Nononononono... No *skins*. Yuck! Eeeek! Phew... Just few *lines*,
> as when you make a button and than "tweak" its shadowy and alight parts,
> in order to get a "right" "relief", that 3D illusion. *Only* that.

C'mon, don't be so old-skool - 3D look for GUI's was hip in the late 20th
century. :-)


-- 
Best regards,
 Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981)
 using v3.0.0.11 on Windows XP Pro Service Pack 2

DP2: "Blue Shift" by Pete Namlook & Bill Laswell
 from 'Psychonavigation 2'



Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html