Re: AntispamSniper in Commercial and FREE version
MM> Hello all, MM> Saturday, July 29, 2006, Alexander S. Kunz wrote: MP May I ask you why (replace K9, I mean)? >>> I find it more accurate and very easy to configure. The GUI is more >>> attractive, too. >> Even though I find a plugin for TB very attractive, I'm hesitant to try >> another one - the two bayes based antispam plugins for TB that I tried >> sooner or later started to crap out (or refused to work right from the >> start). >> How long have you been using it now? MM> I have used K9 and other external antispams and then used all antispam MM> plugins created for The Bat!, started with BayesIt, then Bayes Filter MM> Plugin, then AGAVA and I am using AntispamSniper for 6 months. MM> And AntispamSniper is the winner. I can't compare it with K9, because I MM> have used K9 more then two years ago, but I like plugin more than external MM> application. I can second the positive feedback on AntispamSniper. I've been using it since v1 was announced and bought a license a few weeks later. Few spams get by it and even fewer false positives. I tried the BayesIt and Bayes Filter plugin but had problems with both. Prior to switching to The Bat earlier this year I used K9 with about 98.5% and AntiSpamSniper seems to be running about the same, My 2 cents worth. Larry -- TheBat! 3.80.06 Windows XP Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: AntispamSniper in Commercial and FREE version
>> I'm hesitant to try another [plugin] - the two bayes based antispam >> plugins for TB that I tried sooner or later started to crap out (or >> refused to work right from the start). MM> I have used K9 and other external antispams and then used all MM> antispam plugins created for The Bat!, started with BayesIt, then MM> Bayes Filter Plugin, then AGAVA and I am using AntispamSniper for 6 MM> months. And AntispamSniper is the winner. MM> I can't compare it with K9, because I have used K9 more then two MM> years ago, but I like plugin more than external application. Watching this thread and I have seen this "AntispamSniper" compared to K9 but not to SpamPal proxy with the Bayesian module. Still teaching it and though it doesn't seem too bad I do *occasionally* see TB! lock up at the "importing messages" part at the end of downloading new mail. It only happens when there are a couple of hundred new messages to retrieve and I am tempted to blame SpamPal. Anyone trying this new AntispamSniper switch from SpamPal and have the same favorable input as the K9 converts do? Thx RG -- Beautiful Butterfly Displays http://FramedButterflyArt.com Random tagline: Good judgment comes from bad experience, and a lot of that Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: unsubscribe
Dear Razgo, @30-Jul-2006, 07:28 +1000 (29-Jul 22:28 here) Russell [R] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: R> How do I unsubscribe from this list? Marck Pearlstone got me off the other R> list ok ... ... and again from this list! ;-) -- Cheers -- //.arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator and fellow end user TB! v3.81.12 Beta on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 2 ' pgpWVPesya36x.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
unsubscribe
How do I unsubscribe from this list? Marck Pearlstone got me off the other list ok but I don't know how to get off this one. Is there a web based place I can unsubscribe from? Its because my original subscribed emaul no longer exists but my ISP keeps forwarding anything that goes to the old address si I cant use that one to unsubscribe "from" unless I can access a web based unsubscribed list? Thanks Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: AntispamSniper in Commercial and FREE version
Hello Marek Mikus & everyone else, on 29-Jul-2006 at 22:30 you (Marek Mikus) wrote: > And AntispamSniper is the winner. I can't compare it with K9, because I > have used K9 more then two years ago, but I like plugin more than external > application. Thanks for the feedback, Marek. Sounds good. Maybe you can compare it with K9... since the development of K9 seems pretty much... dead. -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de) People will accept your ideas much more readily if you tell them that Benjamin Franklin said it first. Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: AntispamSniper in Commercial and FREE version
29 July 2006 - 21:49 Hello Alexander, Saturday, July 29, 2006, 8:37:04 PM, you wrote: ASK> How long have you been using it now? 3/4 weeks. I previously used K9 for about a year - before that, Popfile for about two years. -- Best regards, William Flying with The Bat! Professional version 3.80.06 Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: AntispamSniper in Commercial and FREE version
Hello all, Saturday, July 29, 2006, Alexander S. Kunz wrote: MP>>> May I ask you why (replace K9, I mean)? >> I find it more accurate and very easy to configure. The GUI is more >> attractive, too. > Even though I find a plugin for TB very attractive, I'm hesitant to try > another one - the two bayes based antispam plugins for TB that I tried > sooner or later started to crap out (or refused to work right from the > start). > How long have you been using it now? I have used K9 and other external antispams and then used all antispam plugins created for The Bat!, started with BayesIt, then Bayes Filter Plugin, then AGAVA and I am using AntispamSniper for 6 months. And AntispamSniper is the winner. I can't compare it with K9, because I have used K9 more then two years ago, but I like plugin more than external application. -- Bye Marek Mikus Czech support of The Bat! http://www.thebat.cz Using the best The Bat! 3.81.12 Beta under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 with MyMacros,XMP,AnotherMacros, NOD32 Antivirus plugin and AntispamSniper v 1.6.2 Notebook Acer, Pentium4-M 2.2 GHz, 512 MB RAM Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: AntispamSniper in Commercial and FREE version
Hello The Janitor & everyone else, on 29-Jul-2006 at 20:30 you (The Janitor) wrote: MP>> May I ask you why (replace K9, I mean)? > I find it more accurate and very easy to configure. The GUI is more > attractive, too. Even though I find a plugin for TB very attractive, I'm hesitant to try another one - the two bayes based antispam plugins for TB that I tried sooner or later started to crap out (or refused to work right from the start). How long have you been using it now? FWIW, K9 is running here something like 1 1/2 years now (or maybe even longer, the statistics are wrong since I started with a new system about half a year ago, and only imported the old K9 databases) and its results are always steady. I have my ISP delete all messages with a SpamAssassin rating higher than 4 the moment they arrive, so K9 only deals with the remaining few spam mails that SA couldn't catch, and it does a very good job at that. :-) -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de) Stay young by hanging on to your dreams. There is not much to do but bury a man when the last of his dreams is dead. -- Wilfred Peterson Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: AntispamSniper in Commercial and FREE version
29 July 2006 - 19:26 Hello Mark, Friday, July 28, 2006, 8:52:56 PM, you wrote: MP> May I ask you why (replace K9, I mean)? I find it more accurate and very easy to configure. The GUI is more attractive, too. It's hard to explain but it just feels 'tighter' somehow. -- Best regards, William Flying with The Bat! Professional version 3.80.06 Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html