On 28 June 2012, 21:27, MFPA wrote:

> I was recently looking at a table of suggested Linus equivalents of 
> Windows software at 
> <http://www.linuxrsp.ru/win-lin-soft/table-eng.html>. They have an 
> entry for "Email client in The Bat style" with five suggestions: 
> Sylpheed, Claws Mail, Kmail, Gnus, and Balsa.

> Are such mail clients really so poor as to merit keeping a Windows 
> client on a Linux machine?~~~

FWIW, reliance on TB! is one of the things that prevent me from going
completely over to Linux, so it's good to read that one can run TB!
successfully under WINE.

To answer your question: In my case there are two reasons:-
1. I have a lot of time and effort invested in my sorting office
   rules, templates, and address book and have no wish to duplicate
   that effort.
2. I archive messages rather than just delete them, I'm not sure
   whether the archive software I use (Mailbag Assistant from Fookes
   Software) can run successfully under WINE, and I don't want to risk
   'losing the lot' if it seems to at first but later turns up a
   'gotcha'!

HTH,

-- 
Geoff Lane
Cornwall, UK
--
Using The Bat! v5.0.34 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3


________________________________________________
Current version is 4.2.42 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Reply via email to