The Bat! message duplication export problem
Here are the steps I use to export messages from a mail folder: 1. Run The Bat!. 2. Click on a message in the mail folder. 3. Press Ctrl+* (asterisks) to expand all message threads. 4. Press Ctrl+A to highlight all messages. 5. Click Tools | Export Messages | UNIX Mailbox 6. In the Save Messages window enter a file name to save the messages. 7. Repeat steps 2 through 6 until all messages in all mail folders have been exported. When I complete the above steps, I copy these files containing all messages over to my Mac OS X computer for Mozilla. When Mozilla reads these UNIX mailbox files, there are many duplicate messages. I then view these UNIX mailbox files through a text editor I use all the time called Multi-Edit 8.0j, or through Windows Notepad, and there are duplicate messages in the UNIX mailbox files. However, when I import the messages into The Bat! to a new mail folder, the duplicate messages do not appear. I installed The Bat! to C:\TheBat. When I copy one of the mailbox MESSAGE.TBB files from one of the directories: C:\TheBat\MAIL\AccountName\Mailbox-folder\MESSAGES.TBB to a test directory (i.e. c:\test), I rename MESSAGES.TBB to MESSAGES.UUE. I then run Winzip and open the MESSAGES.UUE file. I see many ###.TXT (### refers to the message numbers: 1, 2, 3, etc.) files and I extracted these files to the c:\test\msgs directory. I reviewed majority, if not all, of these files and there were no duplicate messages. However, I did notice that each 1.TXT file every one of the MESSAGES.TBB files that I changed to MESSAGES.UUE showed corruption. I am not sure if there is any correlation to this or not, but I thought I would mention it. At least there is an absolute and tedious method to recover messages in The Bat! if ever needed by renaming the *.TBB files to *.UUE and use Winzip to get the individual messages back. Questions: Why does The Bat! duplicate messages when exporting messages? How can I solve this duplicate message export problem? I need to get these messages over to the Mac OS X computer without having many duplicate e-mails in the exported UNIX mailbox files. -- Using The Bat! v1.62i on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
How to completely backup/restore The Bat!
I thought I would post this information in case anyone may find it useful. These steps I use to keep The Bat! current on the computer I am using. Although I do not always export the registry, I included it as part of the instructions for others that I provide these instructions. How to completely back up The Bat! 1. Exit The Bat!. 2. Export The Bat!'s Windows Registry hive to a reg file: regedit -e c:\TheBat\TheBat.reg HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\RIT 3. Use WinRAR to back up The Bat!'s directory: C:\Program Files\WinRAR\WinRAR.exe a -r c:\TheBat.rar c:\thebat\ How to completely restore The Bat!: 1. UnRAR TheBat.rar to c:\TheBat. 2. Merge c:\TheBat\TheBat.reg to the Windows Registry. 3. Run c:\TheBat\thebat.exe Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
ACCOUNT.LOG -- append data?
How can I make The Bat! append data to the ACCOUNT.LOG file? Currently it seems The Bat! resets the ACCOUNT.LOG file every day. I would like to see an option or have a way to append the data to the ACCOUNT.LOG file. Some time I may need to go back a day or two to find an error message or check on something. -- Using The Bat! v1.62i on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: ACCOUNT.LOG -- append data?
On Friday, April 4, 2003, 10:37:15 AM, you wrote: Hallo Mark, On Fri, 4 Apr 2003 09:50:02 -0500GMT (4-4-03, 16:50 +0200, where I live), you wrote: MK How can I make The Bat! append data to the ACCOUNT.LOG file? Did you try: Account - Properties - Options - Maximum log file size is ... kB? Nope. I overlooked that option. I just set that to 500KB for the time being. Thank you. -- Using The Bat! v1.62i on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Auto-save every N sec feature
In The Bat! 1.63i when I go to Options | Editor Preferences | General there is this setting: Auto-save every [0 ] sec Is this setting for saving a message that you are composing every N seconds? If yes, where does it save the message you are composing? When I click Help in the Editor Preferences tab, there is no information about this feature. -- Using The Bat! v1.62i on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Auto-save every N sec feature
On Friday, April 4, 2003, 5:51:24 PM, you wrote: On Saturday, April 5, 2003, 00:48, Mark Knipfer wrote: Is this setting for saving a message that you are composing every N seconds? Yes. If yes, where does it save the message you are composing? To the outbox, as a draft. Great feature IMHO. Yes it is. I am trying to get more users to convert over to The Bat!. This is another strong point of The Bat! that I can use. Thank you. -- Using The Bat! v1.62i on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Mozilla and Netscape 7 format flowed messge format causing problems with The Bat! 1.60Q
On Tuesday, June 11, 2002, 10:03:00 PM, Mark Knipfer wrote: MK I have been receiving e-mails from users using Mozilla 1.0.0+ and MK Netscape 7 PR1 using the default message format flowed settings. MK This is causing The Bat! 1.60Q to lock up and at times cause MK database file corruptions where I cannot recover messages in the MK mail folder where the message got received. [ snip ] What is the valid e-mail address to report bugs? When I sent this e-mail to this list and to [EMAIL PROTECTED], I received this bounced messge: The original message was received at Wed, 12 Jun 2002 08:04:58 +0600 (YEKST) from host-212.56.194.249.mldnet.com [212.56.194.249] - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Transcript of session follows - 554 5.0.0 MX list for master.e-city.net.ru. points back to gateway.eastwind.ru 554 5.3.5 Local configuration error This is a critical bug in The Bat! that needs to get corrected. -- Using The Bat! v1.60q Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re: Bold Font
On Tuesday, June 11, 2002, 9:57:51 AM, Michael Rupflin wrote: FDH Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] MR but doesnot work ;-;-)),---))) Yes it does. -- Using The Bat! v1.60q Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Mozilla and Netscape 7 format flowed messge format causing problems with The Bat! 1.60Q
I have been receiving e-mails from users using Mozilla 1.0.0+ and Netscape 7 PR1 using the default message format flowed settings. This is causing The Bat! 1.60Q to lock up and at times cause database file corruptions where I cannot recover messages in the mail folder where the message got received. I received a Mozilla 1.0.0+ e-mail message, plain text format, where I could read the message fine. When I tried to reply to the message either by highlighting the text in the message or pressing Ctrl+Enter to quote the entire message, the compose window appeared blank. When I tried to quote and reply to the e-mail, this disables all copy and paste functions in The Bat! and in Windows 2000 and Windows XP. I have to restart Windows 2000/XP to gain the copy and paste functionality back. When I receive a Netscape 7 PR1 message using format flowed format, The Bat! 1.60Q locks up when trying to read the plain text or HTML e-mail message. The mail folder that received these e-mails lost all e-mails. I am keeping the e-mail on the mail server as I am still using Forte, Inc. Agent to receive all e-mails. These Mozilla and Netscape 7 format flowed message problems only occur in The Bat! 1.60Q. I am trying to use The Bat! for my primary e-mail client, but with these problems I cannot do so as I cannot afford to lose e-mails. -- Using The Bat! v1.60q Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
How do I set an e-mail account as the default account?
How do I set an e-mail account as the default account? I have four POP3 e-mail account set up in TB! and I want to make one of them the default for when I click on a mailto: links. Currently TB! uses the previously selected e-mail account. If I close TB! on an e-mail account that is not my primary account and click on a mailto: link in a web page, TB! opens the compose window using the default opened account. -- Using The Bat! v1.60q OS: Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re: How do I set an e-mail account as the default account?
On Saturday, June 8, 2002, 11:13:38 AM, Mark Knipfer wrote: MK How do I set an e-mail account as the default account? I found the setting: * Highlight the account you want to set as default * Click Account | Properties * In the General tab select: [V] This account is the default for mailto:; URLs -- Using The Bat! v1.60q OS: Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re: How do I set an e-mail account as the default account?
On Saturday, June 8, 2002, 11:24:23 AM, Jonathan Angliss wrote: JA On Sat, 8 Jun 2002 11:13:38 -0400, you wrote: How do I set an e-mail account as the default account? JA Select the account you want to be default, go to account properties, JA and there is a small tick box that says user this account as JA default mailto:; or something similar to that. I believe it's on the JA first few pages (might even be the first) of the account properties, JA but my memory isn't so good right now. Thank you. I just found that setting. I guess I kept overlooking it when I searched for it before. -- Using The Bat! v1.60q OS: Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
TB! Options | Preferences | Viewer questions - plain text
In TheBat! 1.60k when I click Options | Preferences | Viewer, the 'View message using' is set to Fixed Width Font Viewer (fast). When I select an item in the Item: list such as Background, Regular Text, or Fixed Width Text to change the setting, none of the change take affect. However, when I set 'View message using' to Rich Text/HTML Viewer (slower but with proportional fonts), all setting take affect. I notice in the second window it shows Rich Text/HTML viewer layout. Does this mean that all settings in the Item list pertains only to the Rich Text/HTML Viewer setting? -- Using The Bat! v1.60k OS: Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 Current Ver: 1.60k FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re: TB! Options | Preferences | Viewer questions - plain text
On Friday, May 17, 2002, 7:56:55 AM, David van Zuijlekom wrote: On Friday, May 17, 2002 at 07:42:08 -0400, you wrote concerning 'TB! Options | Preferences | Viewer questions - plain text': ... Does this mean that all settings in the Item list pertains only to the Rich Text/HTML Viewer setting? Yes I believe so. Maybe it's better if Ritlabs would blank those items when you choose the plain text viewer. I agree. After seeing the Rich Text/HTML viewer layout wording, that is when I derived these settings only pertained to the Rich Text/HTML mode. -- Using The Bat! v1.60k OS: Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 Current Ver: 1.60k FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re: TB! Options | Preferences | Viewer questions - plain text
On Friday, May 17, 2002, 7:57:17 AM, Peter Palmreuther wrote: On Friday, May 17, 2002 at 1:42:08 PM you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (at least in part): MK Does this mean that all settings in the Item list pertains only to the MK Rich Text/HTML Viewer setting? Yes. Thank you. -- Using The Bat! v1.60k OS: Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 Current Ver: 1.60k FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re: Diagnose filter
On Sunday, May 5, 2002, 8:56:04 AM, Adam wrote: A How can you diagnose a filter? I set up a filter that should filter A hundreds of messages, but only got 4. A And can you have a filter do nothing? Just run through, counting the A messages it applies to? Filter the messages back to the same mail folder, or to a test mail folder. The filter will show you the number of message it filtered. Then you can change the designation mail folder in the filter. -- Using The Bat! v1.60j OS: Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current Ver: 1.60i FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
TheBat does not fully render HTML messages
I am noticing in the HTML messages that I receive not all HTML parts of the message is rendering, such as graphics and other parts of the HTML message. The same message appears to render fine in Microsoft Outlook Express 6.0 and Netscape Communicator 4.79 Messenger. Is this a known TheBat! HTML rendering issue? -- Using The Bat! v1.60j OS: Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 Current Ver: 1.60i FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re: Bold bug
On Saturday, May 4, 2002, 9:59:04 PM, Adam wrote: A Text stays bold arbitrarily. Please provide me the information on this one, I don't know where you mean the text stays bolded. A Have they tweaked the new features yet, other than making Menu A Navigator disappear even though it remains selected? I did not notice the Menu Navigator no longer there until I read your message. I never used that feature anyway, so I did not miss it. -- Using The Bat! v1.60j OS: Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current Ver: 1.60i FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Connection Centre window throws off Windows Alt+Tab window toggle
Is there a way in TheBat! to show a mail check is occurring when the Connection Centre hidden? The Connection Centre window opens/closes all the time and this is starting to throw off the window toggle (Alt+Tab) in Windows. I currently have the Connection Center hidden, but if there is also a way to prevent the Connection Centre throwing off window sequence in Windows, this would be good also. -- Using The Bat! v1.60j OS: Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current Ver: 1.60i FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Re: Bold bug
On Saturday, May 4, 2002, 10:22:26 PM, Adam wrote: A On Sat, 4 May 2002, Mark Knipfer wrote: On Saturday, May 4, 2002, 9:59:04 PM, Adam wrote: A Text stays bold arbitrarily. Please provide me the information on this one, I don't know where you mean the text stays bolded. A In your list of messages, they start out bold. Unread. And then turn A normal (or what is the opposite of bold?). They used to. But sometimes A they don't now. I only experienced a problem like this when a S/MIME signed message appeared in the message thread. -- Using The Bat! v1.60j OS: Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current Ver: 1.60i FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
MailTicker oddity
In TB! v1.60j I set the MailTicker to 'Automatically'. I normally do not use this feature and wanted to see if I would like to use this feature. I have three POP3 e-mail accounts set up in TB!. In the first e-mail account I see recently read messages still appearing in the MailTicker. I read and deleted the message, but the message still appears in the MailTicker. When I double-click on the message in the MailTicker, the message appears blank (no To, From, Subject, etc.). It also appears if I open an unread (new) message from my other e-mail account by double-clicking on the message in the MailTicker, the messages opens in TB! message window where I can read it. When I close the message, the MailTicker closes also. The MailTicker closed when the first e-mail account had an unread (new) message in a mail folder and became marked read when the MailTicker closed. However, this MailTicker oddity does not consistently occur. -- Using The Bat! v1.60j OS: Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current Ver: 1.60i FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
Cannot delete attachments on a Inline Forwarded message
I have an inline forwarded message in TB! 1.60j where I see an attachment message.msg. When I double-click on the message.msg attachment, the View Folder window opens showing the message with the file attachments. I right-click on the attachments and click Delete. Both attachments appear deleted. When I close the View Folder window, I return to the original message where I see message.msg attachment. I double-click on the message.msg file again and see the attachments. The attachments do not delete from the message. How can I delete these attachments in TB! 1.60j in the inline forwarded message? -- Using The Bat! v1.60j OS: Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current Ver: 1.60i FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
mail folder to a sub-mail folder?
How do I move a mail folder into another mail folder to create a sub mail folder? Current folders: folder-a folder-b folder-c Want to do this: folder-a folder-b folder-c -- Using The Bat! v1.60i OS: Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 Current Ver: 1.60h FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mail folder to a sub-mail folder?
On Friday, May 3, 2002, 9:29:14 AM, Eddie Castelli wrote: EC --- Mark Knipfer / Freitag, 03.05.2002, 15:20:59 EC mail folder to a sub-mail folder? Current folders: folder-a folder-b folder-c Want to do this: folder-a folder-b folder-c EC Point to 'folder-b' on OLD position EC Press simultanious 'CTRL + ALT' and HOLD the Keys and klick with EC left button on your mouse HOLD it DOWN and move the folder! Thank you. This worked! -- Using The Bat! v1.60i OS: Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 Current Ver: 1.60h FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Anti-Virus
On Thursday, May 2, 2002, 7:49:06 AM, Marck D Pearlstone wrote: MDP Hi Paul, MDP @02 May 2002, 22:28:39 -0400 (03:28 UK time) Paul Cartwright wrote in MDP [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] MDP Does this help? I sent myself 2 test messages and they were signed, as was a message I sent to Linna : BTW, Your certificate is showing up lean an GREEN : ) YOUR VALID ( LOL ) so, without tweaking any settings ( I like combined sned/receive) I think I have actually DONE IT ! MDP There's only one possible response this deep into a thread: I see Paul Cartwright's message in this thread, but I cannot read it and the Mesage Flag shows yellow with a checkmark in it. What does this mean? I also cannot mark the message thread read. -- Using The Bat! v1.60h OS: Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 Current Ver: 1.60h FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Anti-Virus
On Thursday, May 2, 2002, 8:19:25 AM, Marck D Pearlstone wrote: MDP @02 May 2002, 08:07:55 -0400 (13:07 UK time) Mark Knipfer wrote in MDP [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I see Paul Cartwright's message in this thread, but I cannot read it and the Mesage Flag shows yellow with a checkmark in it. What does this mean? I also cannot mark the message thread read. MDP This has already been widely discussed here. To see the message when MDP using 1.60h, switch your S/MIME settings to MS CryptoAPI. There is an MDP incompatibility between the two S/MIME implementations. How exactly do I do that in TB!? I see no MS CryptoAPI setting in TheBat! 1.60h. -- Using The Bat! v1.60h OS: Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 Current Ver: 1.60h FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Anti-Virus
On Thursday, May 2, 2002, 8:34:21 AM, Mark Knipfer wrote: MK On Thursday, May 2, 2002, 8:19:25 AM, Marck D Pearlstone wrote: MDP @02 May 2002, 08:07:55 -0400 (13:07 UK time) Mark Knipfer wrote in MDP [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I see Paul Cartwright's message in this thread, but I cannot read it and the Mesage Flag shows yellow with a checkmark in it. What does this mean? I also cannot mark the message thread read. MDP This has already been widely discussed here. To see the message when MDP using 1.60h, switch your S/MIME settings to MS CryptoAPI. There is an MDP incompatibility between the two S/MIME implementations. MK How exactly do I do that in TB!? MK I see no MS CryptoAPI setting in TheBat! 1.60h. I just found it: Options | S/MIME and select 'Microsoft CryptoAPI' -- Using The Bat! v1.60h OS: Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 Current Ver: 1.60h FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject line problem in TB! 1.60h
I received an e-mail message containing a valid subject line with some foreign characters, which the subject line has two Re:: Subject: Re: Re: ... ... ... Rep... When I replied to the user's mesage, the Subject: line appear blank. When I press Ctrl+Shift+K the Subject: line looks like this: Subject: =?ISO-8859-1?B?UmU6IFJlc3BvbnNlIGZyb20gTWFyeSBOZWxzb24gb24gdGhl IGZvcm06?= =?ISO-8859-1?B?IFBDIEFjY2VzcyBmb3IgIMKgV2luZG93cyDCoFByb2JsZW0gUmVwLi4 u?= Why is this occurring? -- Using The Bat! v1.60h OS: Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 Current Ver: 1.60h FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: TB! 1.60i Release
On Thursday, May 2, 2002, 1:09:32 PM, Han's wrote: Hs The Bat! v1.60i, now show invalid signature, Hs many thanks guys,... ;) Hs http://www.ritlabs.com/ftp/pub/the_bat/beta/tb160i.rar Is there a way to distribute self-extracting RAR files? I do not have WinRAR installed on this system. -- Using The Bat! v1.60h OS: Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 Current Ver: 1.60h FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TheBat! and S/MIME inquiry
In TheBat! 1.60i when I click Options | S/MIME, the S/MIME Preference window shows 'Internal Implementation' selected for the S/MIME Engine. Does TheBat! automatically allow you to create and use S/MIME signatures and encrypt messages without needing to get a S/MIME certificate from Verisign or Thawte? I read through TheBat!'s help file and there is nothing there that tells you what to do from start to finish if you are not familiar with S/MIME. -- Using The Bat! v1.60i OS: Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 Current Ver: 1.60h FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Access violation error when selecting Privacy | Encrypt when Complete
On Thursday, May 2, 2002, 6:00:30 PM, Mark Knipfer wrote: MK In TheBat! 1.60h compose window when I select Privacy | Encrypt when MK Complete, TheBat! displays this error initially: MK The Bat! MK (X) Access violation at address 00431F43 in module 'thebat.exe'. MK Read of address 0008. MK OK MK When I click 'Send the letter' button, the same error appears. Updating to TheBat! 1.60i corrected the above error. -- Using The Bat! v1.60i OS: Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 Current Ver: 1.60h FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Access violation error when selecting Privacy | Encrypt when Complete
In TheBat! 1.60h compose window when I select Privacy | Encrypt when Complete, TheBat! displays this error initially: The Bat! (X) Access violation at address 00431F43 in module 'thebat.exe'. Read of address 0008. OK When I click 'Send the letter' button, the same error appears. Why? -- Using The Bat! v1.60h OS: Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 Current Ver: 1.60h FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: TheBat! and S/MIME inquiry
On Thursday, May 2, 2002, 6:09:47 PM, Mark Knipfer wrote: MK In TheBat! 1.60i when I click Options | S/MIME, the S/MIME Preference MK window shows 'Internal Implementation' selected for the S/MIME Engine. MK Does TheBat! automatically allow you to create and use S/MIME signatures MK and encrypt messages without needing to get a S/MIME certificate from MK Verisign or Thawte? MK I read through TheBat!'s help file and there is nothing there that tells MK you what to do from start to finish if you are not familiar with S/MIME. I finally figured it out. -- Using The Bat! v1.60i OS: Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 Current Ver: 1.60h FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using TheBat! comments -- next unread message annoyance
I like many features in TheBat! that I have been testing and using over the past several weeks. However, there is one very annoying issue that may make me to continue my usage of Forte, Inc. Agent for e-mail. Each time I start to read unread messages in mail folders, TheBat! does not always proceed to the first unread message in a mail folder. For instance, in this message thread the first three message have already been read. Three new unread message arrive in the thread. TheBat! may start reading the second from last message (--) and not the previous message. At times I cannot determine if previous messages are unread messages (which I do have Message Flags column present): This is a test message Re: This is a test message Re: This is a test message Re: This is a test message [new unread message] Re: This is a test message [new unread message] -- Re: This is a test message [new unread message] Is there any way to get TheBat! to read the first unread message in a mail folder? When I use Agent, Agent proceed to first unread message in the mail folder and continues thereon. -- Using The Bat! v1.60i OS: Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 Current Ver: 1.60h FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: S/MIME questions
On Thursday, May 2, 2002, 7:04:40 PM, Tim wrote: T I, too, have been trying S/MIME since reading the recent posts, and T now have some questions for the list. I have always wanted to use S/MIME messages for encrypting e-mails and signing messages, but majority of e-mail users do not like such signatures and do not encrypt e-mails. T 1. I think I am correctly signing emails, using CryptoAPI. They T certainly appear signed in TB!, but when I sent a message to my work T email and checked it at work (where I am forced to use Outlook 98), T the text was present with no signature. It's possible that the T company firewall stripped the signature as a disallowed attachment. Does Outlook 98 support this digital signatures? T So, is this email properly signed? I see Invalid Signature. T 3. Now I've succeeded in sending an encrypted message, but I can't T read it myself. I thought the relevant setting was Always encrypt to T sender's certificate. I have this set (and had it set when I sent the T encrypted message). T Is this a bug or did I do something wrong? I generated my S/MIME signature through TheBat!'s internal implemenation and I can sign and encrypt e-mails to myself with no problems. -- Using The Bat! v1.60i OS: Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 Current Ver: 1.60h FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Compress all folders on exit question
Should the 'Compress all folders on exit' option always be selected? Does this have any negative impact on TheBat!'s database files? -- Using The Bat! v1.60h OS: Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 Current Ver: 1.60h FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
W32.Nimda.enc virus causing problem in TheBat! 1.53d
A colleague of mine uses TheBat! 1.53d. He started to receive the Nimda.enc virus today. Each time a message arrives with the Nimda.enc virus, TheBat! 1.53d creates a bat###.TMP file in the Windows TEMP directory in Windows 2000, Norton AntiVirus Corporate Edition 7.5x detects the virus, and he has to exit TheBat! to get it to work again. The Nimda.enc virus get launched through an IFRAME SRC tag in an HTML message. Why is the TheBat! 1.53d get affected by the Nimda.enc virus? -- Using The Bat! v1.60h OS: Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 Current Ver: 1.60h FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: W32.Nimda.enc virus causing problem in TheBat! 1.53d
On Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 7:50:29 PM, Marck D Pearlstone wrote: MDP -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- MDP Hash: SHA1 MDP @02 May 2002, 19:43:48 -0400 (00:43 UK time) Mark Knipfer wrote in MDP [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Why is the TheBat! 1.53d get affected by the Nimda.enc virus? MDP It's not! It has to store incoming mail somewhere. NAV is being way MDP over-zealous. MDP There are two things he could do here: MDP 1) Turn off NAV, let the message arrive and delete it from TB with no MDP problem. MDP 2) Use the mail dispatcher to delete the infected message from the MDP server. Thank you. MDP Just because a virus is received in the inbox, that doesn't mean MDP you're infected - not with TB you're not! g. Correct. -- Using The Bat! v1.60h OS: Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 Current Ver: 1.60h FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Inbox - Known -- docmentation?
Is there any documentation available on the Inbox - Known folder; how it works, etc.? TheBat! 1.60h Help file lacks documentation on this mail folder. If there is a web page providing such documentation, please cite the URL. Thank you. -- Using The Bat! v1.60h OS: Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 Current Ver: 1.60h FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Deleted and removed Trash folder messages remain on mail server - bug?
In TheBat! 1.60h I have the following settings: Account | Properties | Mail management (*) Leave mesages on server [v] Delete message from server when it is removed from the Trash Account | Properties | Options [v] Empty Trash folder on exit When I delete an e-mail, the message goes to the Trash folder. When I exit TheBat! 1.60h, all messages in the Trash folder get deleted. When I run TheBat! 1.60h again, no messages appear in the Trash folder. However, when I click Account | Dispatch Mail On Server | All Messages, I see the message(s) on the mail server showing the Delete checkbox checked, but the message(s) do not delete from the mail server. The message appear marked for deletion and always remain there. How can I get TheBat! 1.60h to remove these messages on the mail server based on the above settings? According to TheBat! 1.60h Help file: Mail management Settings Delete message from server when it is removed from Trash - use this option if you want your messages to be kept on the server until you delete them and they are removed from the trash folder. -- Using The Bat! v1.60h OS: Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 Current Ver: 1.60h FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Deleted and removed Trash folder messages remain on mail server - bug?
On Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 9:19:19 PM, Allie C Martin wrote: ACM Mark Knipfer [MK] wrote: ACM ... MK How can I get TheBat! 1.60h to remove these messages on the mail MK server based on the above settings? ACM To narrow the problem down, have you tried deleting messages from the ACM trash manually Yes, with no succes. ACM or with a purge operation and seeing how TB! deals with ACM it the next time a mail check is performed? Is there a way to set up TheBat! to purge on exit? Otherwise I will need to click Folder | Purge all folders or Purge+Compress, correct? ACM If it works under those circumstances, it would seem that the feature ACM doesn't work across shutdown and restarts of TB!. -- Using The Bat! v1.60h OS: Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 Current Ver: 1.60h FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Deleted and removed Trash folder messages remain on mail server - bug?
On Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 9:19:19 PM, Allie C Martin wrote: ACM Mark Knipfer [MK] wrote: ACM ... MK How can I get TheBat! 1.60h to remove these messages on the mail MK server based on the above settings? ACM To narrow the problem down, have you tried deleting messages from the ACM trash manually or with a purge operation and seeing how TB! deals ACM with it the next time a mail check is performed? If it works under ACM those circumstances, it would seem that the feature doesn't work ACM across shutdown and restarts of TB!. Update.. Steps to reproduce bug and delete messages from mail server: 1. Send an e-mail to yourself Subject: Test 1. 2. Receive the Subject: Test 1 message. 3. Delete the Subject: Test 1 message to the Trash folder. 4. Exit TheBat! 1.60h. 5. Run TheBat! 1.60h. The message from the Trash folder is done. click Account | Dispatch Mail On Server | All Messages and the Test 1 message is still there. 6. Send another test e-mail to your self Subject: Test 2. 7. Receive the Subject: Test 2 message. Delete it to the Trash folder. 8. Exit TheBat! 1.60h. 9. Run TheBat! 1.60h. Click Account | Dispatch Mail On Server | All Messages and you will notice the Test 1 message is no longer present on the mail server and the Test 2 message is still on the mail server and marked for deletion. If you exit and run TheBat! 1.60h again and again, the Test 2 message remains marked for deletion on the mail server. However, if you send a Test 3 message, receive and delete the message, then the Test 2 message will get deleted from the mail server when it has already been deleted from the Trash folder much earlier. This is definitely a bug in TheBat! 1.60h. If this feature actually worked correctly, this would be great. If you want to delete the message(s) marked for deletion on the mail server on the last exit, the next time you run TheBat! you will need to manually delete them from the mail server through the Dispatch Mail On Server | All Messages feature. I wonder when RIT Labs will fix this bug. I am thinking about switching over to TheBat! and this is one main feature I would like to use. -- Using The Bat! v1.60h OS: Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 Current Ver: 1.60h FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Deleted and removed Trash folder messages remain on mail server - bug?
On Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 9:54:58 PM, Allie C Martin wrote: ACM It's definitely working just fine at your end. I concur now. :) ACM You can now go ahead and switch to TB! ;-))) I have a few other issues to mend out still. -- Using The Bat! v1.60h OS: Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 Current Ver: 1.60h FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Deleted and removed Trash folder messages remain on mail server - bug?
On Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 9:44:21 PM, Allie C Martin wrote: ACM I just tried it and it works over here. I sent myself some messages ACM with your configuration. Checked the server. The messages were there ACM and marked as read. I deleted the messages and they were still there ACM on the server. I then deleted them from the trash, did a mail check ACM so that TB! could delete the messages and then checked the server .. ACM they were gone. ACM I then tried it across a shutdown, and it also worked. Remember that ACM TB! does the deletion upon the next mail check. If you shutdown and ACM restart, it's when you check for mail for the first time that TB! ACM updates the server, deleting the relevant messages. In TheBat! 1.60h here are my pertinent settings: Account | Properties | Mail management (*) Leave messages on server [v] Delete message from server when it is removed from the Trash Account | Properties | Options [ ] Check mailbox at start-up [v] Periodical checking each [3 ] [minutes ] [v] Empty Trash folder on exit When I deleted an e-mail to the Trash folder, exited and ran TheBat! again, I was not waiting long enough for TheBat! to check e-mail based on my time interval setting. If I had (or have) Check mailbox at start-up feature selected, then TheBat! would have deleted the marked e-mails for deletion on the mail server. This feature is working in TheBat! 1.60h. I was just too impatient with the almost correct TheBat! settings. :) Thank you for your help and patience. -- Using The Bat! v1.60h OS: Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 Current Ver: 1.60h FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
POP3 mail management question
Does the Keep messages on server for [N ] days feature actually work? I have attempted to use this feature in other programs where it did not work. I thought about using these settings in TheBat!: Account | Properties | Mail management (*) Leave messages on server [v] Keep messages on server for[3 ] days [v] Delete message from server when it is removed from the Trash Account | Properties | Options [ ] Check mailbox at start-up [v] Periodical checking each [3 ] [minutes ] [v] Empty Trash folder on exit where I could allow TheBat! to maintain my POP3 mail for me. -- Using The Bat! v1.60h OS: Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 Current Ver: 1.60h FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mail folder shows new unread messages, cannot read them
In TheBat! 1.60h I am experiencing a frequently occurring problem. TheBat receives new e-mails in a mail folder. The number of new unread messages appear out from the folder. The messages appear unread (bold) in the message list. When I press Ctrl+] or Ctrl+[ or even highlight the new unread messages, including hitting Ctrl+M on the mail folder to mark all messages read, TheBat! will not proceed to read the new unread messages where it will mark the messages read. I have to exit and run TheBat! 1.60h several times to even be able to read the unread messages in the mail folder(s) by pressing the Ctrl+] or Ctrl+[ keys. This is an annoying problem in TheBat! 1.60h. I thought about switching to TheBat! until Forte, Inc. releases Agent 2.0 later this year, but after the problems I am experiencing in TheBat! I am beginning to wonder. -- Using The Bat! v1.60h OS: Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 Current Ver: 1.60h FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Expanding and collpasing message threads question
In TheBat! 1.60c is there an easy way to expand and collapse the current and all message threads in a mail folder? -- Using The Bat! v1.60h OS: Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Read next unread message in mail folder
How does TheBat! 1.60c determine the next unread message in the next mail folder? When I press Ctrl+] (next unread message) and the next unread message (or messages) are in a proceeding mail folder, TheBat! does not always start at the first unread message in the mail folder. TheBat! may start reading an unread message down in a message thread where I would need to read the first messages. -- Using The Bat! v1.60h OS: Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unread message in message thread
Why does TheBat! show an entire message thread unread when one message in the thread is actually the unread message? I find it only confusing to mark an entire message thread unread if only one or more message in the mesage thread are actually new unread messages. I had an unread message arrive in a very long message thread. TheBat! displayed the entire message thread unread and only showed 1 new unread message in the mail folder. -- Using The Bat! v1.60h OS: Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Filtering spam e-mails
What is the best way to filter spam e-mails by subject and domains? I prefer to filter spam e-mails by subject lines and domains to a particular mail folder for review where these messages are automatically marked read. -- Using The Bat! v1.60c OS: Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
How to filtering zero byte messages?
I am trying to filter only messages containing 0 bytes. (0 b). In TheBat! 1.60 Sorting Office - Advanced settings there are these two settings: [ ] Messages is larger than [0 ] KB [ ] Messages is smaller than [0 ] KB I want to filter messages that are zero bytes, no less-than or greater-than. How to filtering zero byte messages? -- Using The Bat! v1.60c OS: Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to filtering zero byte messages?
On Sunday, April 21, 2002, 2:24:57 PM, Miguel A. Urech wrote: I am trying to filter only messages containing 0 bytes. (0 b). MAU I assume messages can't have less than 0 bytes, so setting to less MAU than 1 should do the trick. I tried [x] Messages is smaller than [1 ] KB without success. At this time I cannot get TheBat! to filter zero byte messages. -- Using The Bat! v1.60c OS: Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to filtering zero byte messages?
On Sunday, April 21, 2002, 3:12:33 PM, Brien King wrote: BK What you can try is using the \S (not \s) in the text and have BK presence set to No. This will filter any message out that doesn't BK at least have one space in it. i.e. blank messages. This filter works great: Strings Location Presence \SText No Thank you. -- Using The Bat! v1.60c OS: Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
VeriSign Digital IDs for e-mail?
Does The Bat! support VeriSign's Digital IDs that are 128-bit for e-mail? VeriSign Digital IDs For Secure E-Mail http://www.verisign.com/products/class1/index.html According to The Bat! 1.54 Beta 4 Help file topic Secure messaging with S/MIME, The Bat! supports: * RFC2632 S/MIME Version 3 Certificate Handling * RFC2633 S/MIME Version 3 Message Specification * RFC2634 Enhanced Security Services for S/MIME I cannot these specifications on VeriSign's web site to determine if the VeriSign's Digital ID's work with The Bat!. -- Mark Knipfer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v1.54 Beta/4 on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
SMTP SPA for MSN
Does The Bat! 1.53d or newer support SMTP Secure Password Authentication (SPA)? MSN implemented SMTP SPA lately and many MSN users are not wanting to switch to or use Microsoft Outlook or Outlook Express 5.x. -- Mark Knipfer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v1.54 Beta/4 on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: SMTP SPA for MSN
Tuesday, July 31, 2001, 9:26:24 AM, Thomas F wrote: Hello Mark, On Tue, 31 Jul 2001 08:37:39 -0400 GMT (31/07/2001, 20:37 +0800 GMT), Mark Knipfer wrote: MK Does The Bat! 1.53d or newer support SMTP Secure Password MK Authentication (SPA)? Take a look at Account / Properties / Transport / Send Mail / Authentication. I only see the following settings without no mention of SPA: Accounts | Properties | Transport Click Authentication in the Send Mail section: SMTP Authentication [ ] Perform SMTP authentication (RFC 2554) ( ) Use settings for Mail retrieval ( ) Use specific settings [username and password] ( ) Store password on iKey [ ] Require secure (MD5) authentication [ ] Use POP before SMTP authentication MK MSN implemented SMTP SPA lately and many MSN users are not wanting to MK switch to or use Microsoft Outlook or Outlook Express 5.x. If what they use is something proprietary to MS, change ISP. Based on what I know about MSN SMTP SPA so far, it is not a Microsoft proprietary authentication which I find surprising. -- Mark Knipfer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v1.54 Beta/4 on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: SMTP SPA for MSN
Tuesday, July 31, 2001, 9:48:04 AM, Thomas F wrote: Hello Mark, On Tue, 31 Jul 2001 09:35:47 -0400 GMT (31/07/2001, 21:35 +0800 GMT), Mark Knipfer wrote: MK I only see the following settings without no mention of SPA: MK Click Authentication in the Send Mail section: MK SMTP Authentication What's in a word? ;-) I was just guessing, as I don't know whether SPA is defined in any RFC. Unfortuntely, Secure Password Authentication (SPA) is not a RFC. If The Bat! works with SMTP SPA, I can direct some users over to The Bat! so they can avoid using Microsoft Outlook 2000 or Outlook Express 5.x. -- Mark Knipfer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v1.54 Beta/4 on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: SMTP SPA for MSN
Tuesday, July 31, 2001, 1:58:15 PM, Peter Meyns wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 31 Jul 2001 13:16:11 -0400GMT (which was 19:16 +0200GMT where I live), Mark Knipfer wrote this about SMTP SPA for MSN: MK Peter, MK You are indicating that The Bat! should work fine with MSN's SMTP mail MK server using SPA. Correct? Sorry, Mark, I overlooked MSN. I don't use it and I don't intend to. This setting works fine with my GMX accounts, that are set to SPA. So, The Bat! seems to have no problems... Cheers Peter Are you using SPA with POP3 and/or SMTP on GMX? If The Bat! works with SMTP SPA on GMX, I *presume* it will work on MSN's SMTP mail servers. -- Mark Knipfer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v1.54 Beta/4 on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: TheBat! and Hotmail.
Sunday, July 29, 2001, 9:06:46 AM, Joakim Nilsson wrote: Is it possible to check my Hotmail account with TB! or do I need some external application? After a recent Microsoft and MSN Hotmail discussion, the answer to checking MSN Hotmail with The Bat! is no. You will need to use Microsoft Outlook, Outlook Express 5.x, or Internet Explorer 5.x to access your MSN Hotmail account. -- Mark Knipfer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v1.54 Beta/4 on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: TheBat! and Hotmail.
Sunday, July 29, 2001, 10:00:56 AM, Karin Spaink wrote: Web2Pop can be found at: http://www.jmasoftware.com Does anyone know whether Web2Pop still works after Microsoft's recent changes where they are only allowing Microsoft Outlook, Outlook Express 5.x, or Internet Explorer 5.x to access MSN Hotmail? -- Mark Knipfer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v1.54 Beta/4 on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Cannot unsubscribe from this list
Why can I not unsubscribe from this mailing list? As per the footer on each message: Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I keep sending e-mail messages to the e-mail address for Unsubscribe and I am still subscribed to this mailing list. Is this function broken? I wish to unsubsribe from this mailing list for a while since I not currently using The Bat!. Hopefully The Bat! will improve where I can return using the product. -- Mark Knipfer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The Win2000 Discussion List http://knipferspot.com http://knipferspot.com/win2000.html -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Older The Bat! versions?
Where can I find older The Bat! versions (before 1.4x)? I read a message in the archives there are some earlier The Bat! versions where the message columns do not automatically adjust out when expanding a message thread when messages are threaded by References. I may be able to use an older The Bat! version to accommodate what I need and it may properly work to my needs of the program. -- Mark Knipfer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v1.49 on Windows 98 4.10 Build A -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Threading by Subject problem, same subject from different users
I currently have The Bat! set up this way: View | Display | All Messages (Ctrl =) View | Sort by | Received Time (Ctrl 1) View | Sort by | Descending Order (Ctrl 0) View | View Threads by | Subject (Alt 2) However, when I receive messages from different users using the same subject lines or the subject line remains blank, these messages tend to thread together. This makes it very hard to read several different conversations when the subject line is blank or containing identical subject lines. Is there a way to make The Bat! differentiate the subjects and senders? -- Mark Knipfer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v1.49 on Windows 98 4.10 Build A -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Compressing folders highlights the last two messages in the mail folder
I am seeing where after I select Folder | Compress All folders there are usually two messages highlighted in a mail folder. Why does this occur? -- Mark Knipfer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v1.49 on Windows 98 4.10 Build A -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
E-mail address auto-completion?
Is it possible in The Bat! to auto-complete an entering e-mail address in the To:, CC:, BCC:, etc. field in the Edit Mail Message window from the Address Book, which excludes e-mail addresses not existing in drop down list in these fields? Netscape Communicator 4.x and other e-mail clients do this and wondering if this is possible in The Bat!. -- Mark Knipfer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v1.49 on Windows 98 4.10 Build A -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Cannot access RIT Labs Web site
I cannot access the RIT Labs web site: http://www.ritlabs.com http://198.78.172.135 by Host Name and IP address. Is anyone else experiencing a problem? -- Mark Knipfer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v1.49 on Windows 98 4.10 Build A -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: Cannot access RIT Labs Web site
Thomas wrote: MK Is anyone else experiencing a problem? Both work fine here. There must be a network problem somewhere then. Because I cannot access RIT Labs Web site from two different ISP's. Thanks. -- Mark Knipfer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v1.49 on Windows 98 4.10 Build A -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Cannot delete a Save Draft message in Outbox, only one message in the Outbox
While I was typing in a response to someone, I clicked the Save Draft (Alt+F2) button in the Edit Mail Message window and it saved the mesage in the Outbox mail folder. After I sent the message, the saved draft message remained in the Outbox mail folder. When I right click on the message in the Outbox mail folder and click Delete or press the DELete key on the highlighted message in the Outbox mail folder, the message would not delete. The delete options remain grayed out. When I right clicked on the Outbox mail folder the 'Empty Folder' (Ctrl+Del) option remained grayed out. The message was not parked in the Outbox mail folder. I had to double clicked on the message in the Outbox mail folder and clicked the 'Send the letter' button to send the message again. Once the message was successfully sent, the message finally removed from the Outbox. Why could I not simply delete the message from the Outbox when the message was initially sent out without any problems? -- Mark Knipfer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v1.49 on Windows 98 4.10 Build A -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Read unread message in next mail folder, possible?
Is it possible in TB! 1.49 to skip to the next mail folder that has unread messages in it? If I read messages in the Inbox and the next mail folder down has some new unread messages, is it possible to move to the mail folder with the unread messages in it? When I press Ctrl + ] to read unread messages in the current mail folder, it will not automatically skip over to the next mail folder containing unread messages. Thanks. -- Mark Knipfer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v1.49 on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: Read unread message in next mail folder, possible?
Mark Knipfer wrote: MK Is it possible in TB! 1.49 to skip to the next mail folder that MK has unread messages in it? If I read messages in the Inbox and the MK next mail folder down has some new unread messages, is it possible MK to move to the mail folder with the unread messages in it? MK When I press Ctrl + ] to read unread messages in the current mail MK folder, it will not automatically skip over to the next mail MK folder containing unread messages. MK Thanks. I forgot to include, I am wanting to know if I can accomplish this by not using the mouse, tab and/or arrow keys. If this is not a feature in TB!, this would be nice to see this feature in TB! as a user configurable setting. For those users who would like to see and use this feature can and for those who don't can use TB! as it is now. -- Mark Knipfer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v1.49 on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: Filtering on Sender
Mark Knipfer wrote: T Hi Mark, T On Wed, 7 Feb 2001 21:56:22 -0500GMT (08/02/2001, 10:56 +0800GMT), T Mark Knipfer wrote: MKStrings Location Presence MKemail-address Sender Yes MK What does the "Sender" look for in the message header? Is this the MK e-mail address appearing in the To: field, or the Sender: field? T It looks for both the FROM and the SENDER fields. Thank you. T I think the fitlers get a problem with the trinagular brackets T around the email address, though. If the filter doesn't work, try T deleting the brackets. The syntax email-address represents the actual e-mail address without the actual less than and greater than signs: Strings Location Presence [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender Yes -- Mark Knipfer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: Message-ID macro?
Mark Knipfer wrote: O Hello, the Bat! list recipients, O Thursday, February 08, 2001, Mark Knipfer wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] about O Message-ID macro?: MK Is there a Message ID macro available? If yes, please provide the MK macro for the Message ID. Thank you. From Help Topic "Complete list of template macros": O ---8- O MSGID - insert the current messages Message ID (taken from the O message headers, not working for newly created messages) O ---8- I cannot find this help topic in the The Bat! 1.49 help file. Did RIT Labs update the The Bat! Help file in 1.49e? -- Mark Knipfer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: Message-ID macro?
Mark Knipfer wrote: JA Hello Mark, JA Historians believe that Wed, 7 Feb 2001 at 21:18 GMT -0500 was when, JA Mark Knipfer [MK] typed the following: MK Is there a Message ID macro available? If yes, please provide the MK macro for the Message ID. Thank you. From the What's New file on the RIT webpage: WNF What's new in The Bat! 1.49 Christmas Edition? snip WNF [+] %MsgID and %OMsgID template macros The %MsgID macro is not working, but %OMsgID does work. -- Mark Knipfer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 1.49 -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: Message-ID macro?
Mark Knipfer wrote: O Hello, the Bat! list recipients, O Thursday, February 08, 2001, Mark Knipfer wrote to OK3 about O Message-ID macro?: From Help Topic "Complete list of template macros": O MSGID - insert the current messages Message ID (taken from the MK I cannot find this help topic in the The Bat! 1.49 help file. O Try again. Help / Contents / Message Templates / The complete list of O Template macros. I found it! Thank you. I can find the same help topic when searching for Template Macros. -- Mark Knipfer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v1.49 on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: TB! 1.49 IMAP4: how to get IMAP4 working?
On Wed, 7 Feb 2001 20:29:42 +0100, Jannik Lindquist wrote: Hello Mark and other TBUDLS, On Tuesday, February 06, 2001 at 22:40:24 GMT -0500 Mark Knipfer wrote on "TB! 1.49 IMAP4: how to get IMAP4 working?": MK Is there a particular setting in TB! that needs to be set, other than MK setting the Protocol to IMAP4? Where you do specify the path, or is it not MK needed? All you need to do is set the protocol to IMAP4. I already knew that, as I stated above. But no folders will be created in TB if there isn't any mail in the checked folders. If there *is* mail, a dialog-window will ask you whether you want to create a new folder of the same name as the checked IMAP-folder or rather want to use the inbox (and something else - but I forgot what). TB! detects new messages in the existing IMAP mail folders but no mail folders create in TB!. After reading through past messages in the archives, I see no one has successfully used IMAP4 in TB!. -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: Re[2]: ! 1.49: Message Column Lists moves to the right, message threading
On Mon, 5 Feb 2001 22:48:09 +0100, Jannik Lindquist wrote: I would very much like to learn, what you think could be a better solution. This question alone shows the lack of experience you have with other e-mail clients. It seems to me that you are asking the impossible, if you want TB to solve all threading problems on the amount of space that your split- mode allows. The problem is where the Subject: columns suddenly moves to the right. Did you read my initial messages that explained this? I detailed what occurs, the design flaw, and it supposedly did not do this in earlier TB1 releases. Thus, this seems like a bug (or design flaw) that will hopefully fixed. IMHO, it is better to think of the threading-possibilities in the list-view as a generous bonus - and then do serious thread-reading in the folder-view. Huh? When this is said, I will the first to admit, that the folder-view can be a bit cumbersome, as well. At present, I have expanded the "Message List"-view (in the folder-view) to almost full screen and then toggles this "Message List"-view on and off (using Alt+V+M). This works great for me - but it would be nice with more advanced options for toggling the message list-view on and off (full screen/half screen/off). As you probably know, the news reader Agent solves all these problems by 1) putting a limit on how many follow up-levels there can be in a thread and 2) allowing control of the degree of indentation of the follow-ups There is no maximum per se, but there is a maximum threading level where it will display messages in a thread. In Agent 1.8 if you set the 'Follow-Up Indentation:' to 3 and 'Maximum Follow-Up Level:' to 15, this helps makes more messages properly thread. However, the limitation to message threading still exists. ** In my opinion, 1) is a very poor solution and is one of the main reasons, I gave up Agent as an e-mail reader (and became a TB-user :-)). Is it really something like this, that you want for TB? You did not understand my problem in my message. I am not suggesting any threading limitations or such implementations. If you use Netscape Communicator 4.x and other threading e-mail clients that do threading on References and Message-ID's, you will see what I am referring to. Message threading itself in TB! is good, however, the constant adjusting of the Subject message column is not. -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: ! 1.49: Message Column Lists moves to the right, message threading
Mark Knipfer wrote: MK This question alone shows the lack of experience you have with MK other e-mail clients. WADR What does WADR mean? I have no idea what the acronym means. it shows that Jannik would be interested to hear a constructive view from you as to what could adequately replace the current design and still satisfy the users who already find the current design more than acceptable; users who might see retrograde aspects in copying some of the other solutions which may better suit your expectations. I currently do not have the time to write a constructive view. You can't please all of the people all of the time. I deal with these situations daily. moderator note It is not acceptable for you to make a judgement call on what Jannik's experience may or may not be. That constitutes a derogatory personal remark (albeit politely put) and is expressly against the rules of these lists. /moderator note My remarks were not intended to be derogatory, nor to belittle Jannik. If Jannik and others read my remarks in that tone, I apologize. moderator note 2 I have twice tried to move this thread to TBTECH. On the TBUDL list, I now pronounce the horse dead. /moderator note 2 I did not read your message about moving the discussion to the other list until I responded to the message. Only after I read your message that I knew you moved the discussion to the TBTECH list. -- Mark Knipfer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Message-ID macro?
Is there a Message ID macro available? If yes, please provide the macro for the Message ID. Thank you. -- Mark Knipfer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Filtering on Sender
What is the best way to filter messages that uses a designated Sender: address? I receive e-mail from about 35 different support mailing lists via Majordomo. Each mailing list put the e-mail address preceding with "owner-". My Windows 2000 mailing list address is [EMAIL PROTECTED] The Sender: e-mail address in the message header shows [EMAIL PROTECTED] Also, in Sorting Office window under Incoming Messages, when I create a new filter, under the Filter Strings it shows: Strings Location Presence email-address Sender Yes What does the "Sender" look for in the message header? Is this the e-mail address appearing in the To: field, or the Sender: field? -- Mark Knipfer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: Re[2]: ! 1.49: Message Column Lists moves to the right, message threading
On Tue, 6 Feb 2001 10:54:59 +0100, Marek Mikus wrote: As I know, Stefan spends '6'!!! hours daily for mail support. If they will answer each bugreport and suggestion, when will they create code for TB? Nevermind! I agree. A programmer's time is better spent coding rather than answering e-mail. I know this very well since I do work for a software company, I am their technical solutionist. -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: ! 1.49: Message Column Lists moves to the right, message threading
Mark Knipfer wrote: In TheBat! 1.49 I am using the 'Full-height Account Tree' setting (View | Split Mode | Full-height Account Tree) and the following for message threading: View | Display | All Messages (Ctrl =) View | Sort by | Received Time (Ctrl 1) View | Sort by | Descending Order (Ctrl 0) View | View Threads by | References (Alt 1) My Message Column Settings are: Subject, From, Received, Size, Attachments, Flagging, Priority BUG: I found one annoying bug. In a message thread if you click on the plus signs throughout the entire message thread, you will notice the Message List Columns to the right will gradually move to the right. If you do this through a long threaded message discussion, you will see the remaining Message List Columns just goes to the far right where you have to right scroll over to see them. This is becoming very annoying problem, especially when I am using TheBat! much more now. I have not received any word back from RIT Labs on this problem as I submitted a bug report on it. -- Mark Knipfer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ! 1.49: Message Column Lists moves to the right, message threading
On Mon, 5 Feb 2001 21:19:36 +, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote: .. If you do this through a long threaded message discussion, you will see the remaining Message List Columns just goes to the far right where you have to right scroll over to see them. MK I have not received any word back from RIT Labs on this problem as MK I submitted a bug report on it. IMHO you probably won't. RITl labs have a strict policy of only responding to the first originator of a new bug report. If this is true, then this may not provide other TB! users enough initiative to report program bugs and problems since their effort, time, and work is not worthwhile to RIT Labs. While it is agreed that this is a problem for many, it is, however, the way TB is *designed* to work rather than a "bug". By strict definition a bug is what happens when a program fails to work as intended. You are having a problem with the way the program has been designed to work. I have never seen an e-mail client designed to adjust the message columns based on the Subject thread expansion. This is the first ever. If this is not a bug and it is a design, then this should be referred to a design flaw. This reminds me of the Microsoft saying, "it is not a bug, but a feature." :) The TB programmers will, no doubt, think of a better design for this for v2 but it is a fact that they will not be making any such substantial alterations to the design of v1 while they are working hard to produce v2. As I say, this is a *design* problem, not an operational error. I keep reading general references about TB! v2 without any estimated time of releases or what may be in this version. As it is now, I purchased TB! v1.49 based on the features and how it mostly worked. After purchasing TB!, I noticed the message columns kept adjusting when the message threads expanded. I encountered two other bugs (or designs) in TB! 1.49 that will definitely crash TB! 1.49: #1: When I press Ctrl-* to expand the message threads, if I would accidently or mistakenly press Ctrl-* twice or more, TB! would crash. There were other times where I could not get the message columns to adjust back within the message list area. After exiting and running TB! again, I was able to drag the message columns back. Sometimes the Subject column would disappear from a mail folder and I would need to add it back. I have the 'Use the account default columns settings' selected in all of the mail folders properties. I also keep seeing the column widths randomly adjusting in a variety of widths -- very small to wide. #2: The second bug (or design) is where I clicked "" to add all message columns to the Selected Items: section. I always receive the following error: The Bat! (X) List index out of bounds. OK In the 'Available Items' section the following remains: Message ID, Parking, To, Total Messages, and Unread Messages In the 'Selected Items' column the following is present: Subject, From, Received, Size, Flagging, Attachments, Priority, Colour Group, Created, Folder, Memo, and Message Flags I found a few other bugs (or designs) in TB! 1.49 that crashes TB!. After one TB! crash today I was unable to read any messages in any mail folder. This way after experiencing the above two problems back to back. After exiting and running TB! several times, I was able to read messages in the mail folders. After reading your first part of this message, this gives me no ambition and initiative to report these problems to RIT Labs since they will probably ignore them. To me this shows the lack of interest to possibly solve some current problems where they company could keep or gain more customers. Why it does it this way has already been explained in fairly good detail and, while I sympathize with the frustration you feel, I can't suggest any other way to help. Having said that, Allie Martin suggested a very good way of using TB which makes the problem so much *less* "in your face" and hardly a problem at all. I, too, use TB as he described. Perhaps you should try that? I may not have been subscribed to this mailing list when the detailed reason and explanation was sent. Could you cite the message from the TBUDL archives for me? Because when I searched the mailing list archives I did not find any messages explaining this situation. -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TB! 1.49 IMAP4: how to get IMAP4 working?
I am trying to get TB! 1.49 to work with IMAP4. My ~/mail directory already exists on the server (/home/usernam/mail) and TB! checks for messages in the /mail/* but no mail folders creates in TB!. I read through the TB! Help file and cannot find how TB! gets the directories and messages on IMAP4. Is there a particular setting in TB! that needs to be set, other than setting the Protocol to IMAP4? Where you do specify the path, or is it not needed? -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ! 1.49: Message Column Lists moves to the right, message threading
On Tue, 6 Feb 2001 03:40:44 +, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote: MK If this is true, then this may not provide other TB! users enough MK initiative to report program bugs and problems since their effort, MK time, and work is not worthwhile to RIT Labs. While this is absolutely true and not acceptable for a large and fully staffed software house, those of us that are more used to the lack of response from the less well endowed labs accept that they are busy guys and submit bug reports wherever we can to make their job easier, with or without feedback ;-). I hate spending time analyzing, testing, and duplicating problems in a program and sending them to the software company where they end up in the Trash folder or /dev/null. If I know my message(s) containing bug reports, or design flaws :), will be hopefully acknowledge where the problem will be fixed in the program, this is more initiative to send those bug reports to RIT Labs. To be fair, "Showstopper" bugs that are "every time" issues are usually fixed with a few days (if that long). There aren't many bugs like that left in TB. Hopefully RIT Labs can correct the Ctrl-* bug, what I refer to a bug since it is easily reproducible here on several computers running Windows 2000, and prevent TB! from crashing. For the most part, it's pretty stable software. What's more, it does the job it's supposed to do *extremely* well IMHO. TB! is a fabulous e-mail client. If I did not experience the adjusting message columns problem with enduring the Ctrl-* problem/bug too, I would probably make TB! my primary e-mail client to use. TB! runs fast and seems to be very reliable. However, there are few minor tasks that I do in TB! that makes it crash. MK I have never seen an e-mail client designed to adjust the message MK columns based on the Subject thread expansion. Nor have I. I didn't say that it was a *good* design. Actually, the consensus (even from me) is that it isn't. I'm just trying to say that *this* issue (shifting subject when expanding threads) is down to an incorrect design decision that we're kind of stuck with right now. I thought you were first agreeing that the adjusting message columns when expanding the message threads is a correct design. I see now that you agree and basically stating how it just works in TB!. I cannot stand threading messages by subject since I have always used threading by references. Once you attain yourself to a particular message reading method, it is very hard to break the method. MK This is the first ever. If this is not a bug and it is a design, MK then this should be referred to a design flaw. Agreed. Wow! We agree on something! :) MK This reminds me of the Microsoft saying, "it is not a bug, but a MK feature." :) LOL. Understood, but disagreed for the current context g. That was meant to be an aside remark. MK I encountered two other bugs (or designs) in TB! 1.49 that will MK definitely crash TB! 1.49: These are bugs for sure, not designs. MK #1: snip I can't confirm this one :-(. I kept experience this bug where it about drove me crazy. This is one of the reasons why I am using Agent 1.8 right now rather than TB!. MK #2: MK (X) List index out of bounds. Confirmed! What a bug. :) MK ... After exiting and running TB! several times, I was able to MK read messages in the mail folders. Pass. I've not seen this happen and don't know how to make it happen from your description. I do not know how to make it happen again, but I experience this problem twice today alone with unintentionally experiencing the problem. MK After reading your first part of this message, this gives me no MK ambition and initiative to report these problems to RIT Labs since MK they will probably ignore them. Don't get me wrong. I said "don't expect a response". I didn't say "you'll be ignored". There's quite a bit of difference. They certainly read them all and, if 1) the problem description is sufficient to allow them to reproduce it and 2) if the fix isn't going to break anything else or take an inordinate amount of time for the improvement in functionality then they will try to make the repair. It is hard not to have the feeling of being ignored when you receive no response(s) back. I am not talking about any automated or canned responses, but a real response from a real human with insight to the problem(s)/bug(s). MK ... Could you cite the message from the TBUDL archives for me? There have been several places where this behaviour has been discussed. Firstly with TB v1.36 Date: Tue, 26 Oct 1999 13:11:16 -0500 From: Ali Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Message list comments. ... and the ensuing thread. This was a very early conversation on exactly the same point as you are making. You can see by this how far back the issue has been complained about - and there has not been a single defender of this
! 1.49: Message Column Lists moves to the right, message threading
I am currently testing out TheBat! 1.49 and it is a great program. I previously tried TheBat! and it did not look that good at that time. I guess I really did not look in to the program that well. Because the last two days I have been thoroughly analyzing the program and I cannot find any con's to not to use it, except for a few minor con's. In TheBat! 1.49 I am using the 'Full-height Account Tree' setting (View | Split Mode | Full-height Account Tree) and the following for message threading: View | Display | All Messages (Ctrl =) View | Sort by | Received Time (Ctrl 1) View | Sort by | Descending Order (Ctrl 0) View | View Threads by | References (Alt 1) My Message Column Settings are: Subject, From, Received, Size, Attachments, Flagging, Priority BUG: I found one annoying bug. In a message thread if you click on the plus signs throughout the entire message thread, you will notice the Message List Columns to the right will gradually move to the right. If you do this through a long threaded message discussion, you will see the remaining Message List Columns just goes to the far right where you have to right scroll over to see them. BUG: Once you fully expand the message thread with the Message Column Lists moving to the right, you can click on the minus signs to close the message threads one by one. I discovered when you click on a few minus signs to collapse part of the message thread, you cannot click on the remaining minus signs. I can click on the first plus sign in the message thread to expand that part of the thread, and then I can continue clicking on the minus signs to close the remaining thread. This occurs when you are about four or five levels deep in the message thread. I really like TheBat! 1.49. However, I am hoping the above two BUGS can quickly be fixed since this is a very big annoyance to me. I am evaluating this program since there are several other users that are wanting to purchase this program (along with myself) if everything works for what we need it for. If the above two bugs are quickly fixed, or a workaround is present, this will greatly entice us to purchase the program. -- Mark Knipfer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v1.49 on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ! 1.49: Message Column Lists moves to the right, message threading
Nick Danger wrote: ND Subject: ! 1.49: Message Column Lists moves to the right, message threading NDFrom: Mark Knipfer ND Dated: Sun, 4 Feb 2001, 10:28:46 (9:28:46 AM Local) ND ~~ M Because the last two days I have been thoroughly analyzing the M program and I cannot find any con's to not to use it, except for a M few minor con's. ND 8 - snipped bug description - M However, I am hoping the above two BUGS can quickly be fixed since M this is a very big annoyance to me. --snip-- If the above two bugs are M quickly fixed, or a workaround is present, this will greatly entice M us to purchase the program. ND Just me or are these two paragraphs contradictory? No. However, I did omit in the second BUG paragraph that the Message Column Lists do adjust back to the left little by little as you collapse the message thread. ND Beyond that, I do agree however that the way TB! expands threads is ND annoying. At least I know I am not the only one thinks this. -- Mark Knipfer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ! 1.49: Message Column Lists moves to the right, message threading
Nick Andriash wrote: NA On February 4, 2001, at 7:28:46 AM, Mark Knipfer Wrote: MK View | Display | All Messages (Ctrl =) MK View | Sort by | Received Time (Ctrl 1) MK View | Sort by | Descending Order (Ctrl 0) MK View | View Threads by | References (Alt 1) NA Mark, I have found that if you simply view threads by Subject, you NA won't get the annoying movement of the message columns across the NA top of your screen. Besides, the Re:[#'s] don't seem match up. By NA that, I mean you can have 3 or 4 Re:[2]'s that are replies to NA different authors. NA I've just found it easier and cleaner to view threads by Subject NA alone, and not bother with the References. I prefer to view the message threads by References rather than Subject since I am used to viewing message threads by References. If I view threads by Subject, I may loose track of the discussion -- the order of which the message are received and threaded. -- Mark Knipfer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ! 1.49: Message Column Lists moves to the right, message threading
A. Curtis Martin wrote: MK I prefer to view the message threads by References rather than MK Subject since I am used to viewing message threads by References. MK If I view threads by Subject, I may loose track of the discussion MK -- the order of which the message are received and threaded. ACM If you sort using received time, it's remarkable how well you can ACM follow the discussion when threading using subject. I may try this setup: View | Display | All Messages (Ctrl =) View | Sort by | Received Time (Ctrl 1) View | Sort by | Descending Order (Ctrl 0) View | View Threads by | Subject (Alt 2) -- change Once I change TB! 1.49 to use this format, should I still experience the Message Column Lists adjusting left/right when collapsing/expanding the threads? ACM It's just that the thread breaks when the subject changes. No problem there. Actually, I like that when this happens. -- Mark Knipfer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ! 1.49: Message Column Lists moves to the right, message threading
A. Curtis Martin wrote: MK I may try this setup: MK View | Display | All Messages (Ctrl =) MK View | Sort by | Received Time (Ctrl 1) MK View | Sort by | Descending Order (Ctrl 0) MK View | View Threads by | Subject (Alt 2) -- change ACM This is the exact settings I use for discussion lists where ACM multiple e-mail clients are being used, which makes threading by ACM reference headers only, quite messy. MK Once I change TB! 1.49 to use this format, should I still MK experience the Message Column Lists adjusting left/right when MK collapsing/expanding the threads? ACM No, since expanding a thread sorted by subject will lead to only ACM one extra level. This is why I prefer to thread by References. Due to the effect Subject Threading, I may not try this setup after all. ACM It's just that the thread breaks when the subject changes. MK No problem there. Actually, I like that when this happens. ACM This is annoying when a participant decides to correct a spelling ACM error or correct syntax errors within the subject header. Grrr!! :=) True. I forgot about that. -- Mark Knipfer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TB! 1.49 Registration turnaround time?
I purchased TheBat! 1.49 through CIF Net, Inc. by accessing RIT Labs web page. I received a message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] containing the order information. Does anyone know the turn around time on receiving TheBat! registration information? -- Mark Knipfer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v1.49 on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TB! Save bug
In TheBat! 1.49 when I press Ctrl+S to Save or Alt+F5 to Save As a message to a text file and I specify an already existing file name which I did not know that existed, when I change the file name to a non existing file name, TheBat! continues to say that the new specified file exists. The second normal prompt appears to append the message to the designated file name, which I click No. The append file option is great and I like it. However, TheBat! seems to have a bug when you are trying to save a message to a text file and continues to detect the file exists even after changing the designated save file name. Is this problem fixed in a later build of TheBat!? -- Mark Knipfer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v1.49 on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: TB! 1.49 Registration turnaround time?
Karin Spaink wrote: KS On 04-02-2001 at 18:54, Mark Knipfer kindly wrote: Does anyone know the turn around time on receiving TheBat! registration information? KS Usually it takes no more than two working days. At 1:26 PM Eastern, I receive my e-mail message with the registration information. It took almost one hour. Not bad for a turnaround time. -- Mark Knipfer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: TB! Save bug
Marck D. Pearlstone wrote: MDP On 04 February 2001 at 13:07:43 -0500 (which was 18:07 where I live) MDP Mark Knipfer wrote and made these points: MK ... TheBat! seems to have a bug when you are trying to save a MK message to a text file and continues to detect the file exists MK even after changing the designated save file name. MK Is this problem fixed in a later build of TheBat!? MDP I haven't come across this nor have I seen a report of it before. It's MDP probably worth sending an official bug report to RIT labs (Help.. MDP Feedback.. Bug report). This doesn't sound too complex or fundamental MDP a bug and such bugs often get fixed fairly quickly. When I sent this message to the list, I CC'd the message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to report this error. I am not sure how responsive RIT Labs are when responding to bug reports. Anyone have any experiences on the response times and accuracy of answers from RIT Labs? -- Mark Knipfer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Moving TB! among computers, keeping current on computer(s)
I use three different computers: Computer-A - Windows 2000 Professional Computer-B - Windows 2000 Professional Computer-C - Windows 98SE and keep my e-mail current on the computer that I use at any time. I installed TheBat! 1.49 to C:\TheBat directory. I am wanting to move TheBat! 1.49 to another computer. Can I just back up C:\TheBat directory and use REGEDIT to export the following Windows Registry key "HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\RIT\The Bat!" to move all of my settings to another computer? If one of the other two computers previously had TheBat! installed and it expired some time ago, are there any known problems moving a Registered version of TheBat! to a computer? I am trying to find the best method to constantly keep TheBat! settings, e-mail, etc. all current on the computer that I am using at the time. -- Mark Knipfer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v1.49 on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TB 1.49 to 1.49c or 1.49e differences?
I am noticing that there are some users using TB! 1.49c and 1.49e. What are the differences among the 1.49 to 1.49e versions? Just wondering if any problems that I am experiencing have been fixed in those later builds. -- Mark Knipfer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v1.49 on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pasting text in message does not wrap
When I paste text from a web page, which may consists of several or more sentences, the text does not automatically wrapping in the Edit Mail Message window. Is there a way to make the text to automatically wrap in the Edit Mail Message window? -- Mark Knipfer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v1.49 on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Pasting text in message does not wrap
Januk Aggarwal wrote: MK Is there a way to make the text to automatically wrap in the Edit MK Mail Message window? Edit - Paste Formatted (Shift-Ctrl-Ins) That works great! Thank you. -- Mark Knipfer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Moving TB! among computers, keeping current on computer(s)
George F Schoelles wrote: MK I installed TheBat! 1.49 to C:\TheBat directory. I am wanting to MK move TheBat! 1.49 to another computer. Can I just back up MK C:\TheBat directory and use REGEDIT to export the following Windows MK Registry key "HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\RIT\The Bat!" to move all MK of my settings to another computer? I did it with a backup file from TB, but the REG exported is not common between 98xx and NTxx. Though once imported I did the find lost directory thingy which eludes me at the moment and all seemed fine. I tried moving the Windows 2000 Registry export to the Windows 98SE computer without success -- registry format differences and .REG file format differences too. I installed TB! 1.49 on the Windows 98SE computer. I then backed up the C:\TheBat directory on the Windows 2000 computer using Winzip. Copied the archive file to the Windows 98SE computer. Unzipped the archive file to the C:\TheBat directory. Ran TheBat! without any problems on Windows 98SE. You can only move the Windows Registry portion between alike Windows versions. -- Mark Knipfer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 1.46d IMAP question, where do I specify the mail path?
Britta wrote: In fact, I found the IMAP Inbox on my server in the end. The bit I don't understand is: where (if anywhere) are the other default folders kept? Outbox/Sent/Trash. Does TB! create those? Or is this where we have to wait for version 2 implementation? These are local mail folders. -- Mark Knipfer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://knipferspot.com -- -- View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com To send a message to the list moderation team double click here: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
Re: 1.46d IMAP question, where do I specify the mail path?
Britta wrote: Mark - how did you find that out? I would like to check myself *where* exactly the location of my IMAP inbox is on my server - it should be the path you quoted, but I can't find it there. Where/how can I trace this? When you press F2 to check e-mail on the server, click Details in the window and watch the details in the window scroll down. -- Mark Knipfer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://knipferspot.com -- -- View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com To send a message to the list moderation team double click here: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
