! and GnuPg ?

2001-05-10 Thread Peter Kaleve

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Nick,

NA Peter, are you using GPG through TB!'s Plugin?

yes

NA If so, how did manage to change the comment line?

Simply via the Preferences dialog of GnuPGshell, in the GnuPG...
section there is a [comment] entry. Text filled in there will show
up in GnuPG's options file.

NA Are you experiencing any problems using 1.0.5 with TB!,

Looks like GPG doen't like my RSA key though it's defined as
default, always the DSA key is used.

The 'Version:' line doesn't show the GnuPGshell part.

GnuPG/GnuPGshell/The Bat! plugin erase all blank lines after the
end of the msg text, so by no means it's possible to get the blank
line between eot and the GPG signature.

/pk

- --
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Protect Privacy!

iD8DBQE6+jJOaiLnSm7v+zsRApeKAKDNWw8HiEwdwTa6DyJZwO5ZsF//cwCfRXTI
HLdIZvDDezNMG5/Xct1KhDo=
=rwUy
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





! and GnuPg ?

2001-05-09 Thread Peter Kaleve

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Rob,

R error-message : no default secret key ; secret key not available
R no problems signing with GnuPG from the command-line or with GnuPGShell.

may be this is a bug with v1.52 - try the latest beta (1.52f) from
http://www.ritlabs.com/the_bat/beta.html
(simply extract the executable over your existing one)

/pk

- --
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Protect Privacy!

iD8DBQE6+WLaaiLnSm7v+zsRAiSGAKDbEmhYthb0Bg6wZM2Y0cVkPSo+ZQCeJ3tU
jOH8nnTQwzZD48dbznbPjdc=
=Mhz4
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
__
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





s/mime access violation

2001-01-10 Thread Peter Kaleve

Hi,

evaluting S/MIME functions got the following problem:

signing of msgs works fine, encryption doesn't work,
all I get is:

access violation at address 0050AB6A. Read of address 

any hints? (all certs present, S/MIME activated (switches don't
matter), PGP not activated ...)

/pk


---
Using The Bat! 1.49
under Windows 98 4.10 Build   A 

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





s/mime access violation

2001-01-10 Thread Peter Kaleve

Hello George,

GFS Were the certificates you are encrypting to properly exported with the
GFS ability of encryption enabled?

yes, have checked that twice, the certificate does have the ability of
public key encryption ...

could you please have a look at your mail directory:

do you have a file present in your mail directory called SMIMERND.BIN?

I'm missing this random seed file, The Bat! doesn't create it by
itself (it should as stated by the developers), maybe the access
violation comes from here, either because it's not found or while
trying to create it?


Best regards,
 Petermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


---
Using The Bat! 1.49
under Windows 98 4.10 Build   A 

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org