Re: PGP-problems with TB

2001-11-02 Thread Alexander Levenetz

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello Thomas,


 I disagree. Ritlabs should offer a DLL with the correct version
 number, or even better: a DLL that finds the correct version number.
 Offering a DLL with a wrong version number is plainly wrong.

I pretty much agree with that. It doesn't seem to be a big deal, so
why not have it corrected, especially as PGP really seems to become
more popular every day.

Greetings,
Alexander
\KzdzÌ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.0.2i

iQA/AwUBO+JiVsIGWHbCAlNNEQJFOwCg18ZwbIjBIRbYf54sWF+neJdaZrsAn0a2
lPHhNQ4tszBUwl9omz+P0OGf
=/vD/
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: PGP-problems with TB

2001-11-02 Thread Alexander Levenetz

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello Dierk,


 It should have worked, see my version string.

Looks nice, I want to edit mine too! :-)

 Maybe you just edited the version string in either the wrong DLL

6.5, I was told?

 or the wrong place

That's what I assume. I don't really know where to edit what. Could
you maybe explain that to me in more detail? Off-list, maybe?

 - --
 Dierk Haasis

Interesting, you have the same problem as a friend of mine.

Another question: How do I get rid of the PGP-Signature-text in a
(quoted) reply to an email? There is probably a macro for that, I
assume?

Greetings,
Alexander

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.0.2i

iQA/AwUBO+JjtsIGWHbCAlNNEQJuUwCfS5p+O257bvNfSWQCJhqa+wllj7UAn2Mu
C/GT9tO6eqtpisgOnIBH/Pja
=aanG
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: PGP-problems with TB

2001-11-02 Thread Dierk Haasis

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello Alexander!

On Friday, November 02, 2001 at 11:13:25 AM you wrote:

 or the wrong place

 That's what I assume. I don't really know where to edit what. Could
 you maybe explain that to me in more detail? Off-list, maybe?

Actually I can't really remember. I just opened the file in my hex
editor and searched (by hand, I believe) for the version string. Then
I changed it, watching out not to change anything more - i.e. the size
of the file.

 - --
 Dierk Haasis

 Interesting, you have the same problem as a friend of mine.

i don't see a problem. If you mean the changed sig delimiter, that's
made by PGP so not to confuse any decrypting or verifying operation.

 Another question: How do I get rid of the PGP-Signature-text in a
 (quoted) reply to an email? There is probably a macro for that, I
 assume?

Have a look at the FAQ; there is, I think, a very good RegExp for this
purpose.



- --
Dierk Haasis
http://www.Write4U.de

PGP keys available: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendMyPGPkeys

The Bat 1.54/10 on Windows 95 4.0 1212 C

Yes, *you* can make a difference. You just have to *do* something ...
anything. (Derek Leveret)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8ckt
Comment: Privacy is the core element to Freedom!

iQA/AwUBO+K1L/To1oA8g8dLEQL2wwCeKIfDpiT+0wQFIoRRZ5MiKvdptfkAmQHh
3qXDfKCyc9zl1SU2OnjeJQSW
=/+5o
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: PGP-problems with TB

2001-11-01 Thread Dierk Haasis

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello Alexander!

On Wednesday, October 31, 2001 at 12:51:36 PM you wrote:

 Why is that so? Couldn't that be corrected in a new dll?

Because at the moment - and it is a lng moment as of now - there
is no DLL with a correct version number. It doesn't make sense to
issue new DLL's for PGP use only because the version number is not up
to date - especially since there are various different versions
outside the US.

 Well, that didn't work. But if that is the only reason why the numbers
 don't match then it doesn't really matter, I guess?

It should have worked, see my version string. Maybe you just edited
the version string in either the wrong DLL or the wrong place (in
which case it shouldn't work at all)?




- --
Dierk Haasis
http://www.Write4U.de

PGP keys available: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendMyPGPkeys

The Bat 1.54/10 on Windows 95 4.0 1212 C

My suspicion is that the universe is not only queerer than we suppose,
but queerer than we *can* suppose. (J.B.S. Haldane)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8ckt
Comment: Privacy is the core element to Freedom!

iQA/AwUBO9/4N/To1oA8g8dLEQKHQACgjxL3eaee3eaRGeqtWktq+fE0OB0AoM1/
6+MmfjFpgnck4tMHiF0MRx5o
=RGMZ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: PGP-problems with TB

2001-11-01 Thread Thomas F

Hi Dierk,

On Wed, 31 Oct 2001 15:10:04 +0100GMT (31/10/2001, 22:10 +0800GMT),
Dierk Haasis wrote:

 Why is that so? Couldn't that be corrected in a new dll?

DH Because at the moment - and it is a lng moment as of now - there
DH is no DLL with a correct version number. It doesn't make sense to
DH issue new DLL's for PGP use only because the version number is not up
DH to date - especially since there are various different versions
DH outside the US.

I disagree. Ritlabs should offer a DLL with the correct version
number, or even better: a DLL that finds the correct version number.
Offering a DLL with a wrong version number is plainly wrong.

-- 

Cheers,
Thomas.

Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. Anmeldung unter:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  

Message reply created with The Bat! 1.53t
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998  
on a Pentium II/350 MHz.


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




PGP-problems with TB

2001-10-31 Thread Alexander Levenetz

Hello everybody,


I'm running 1.54 beta10 right now, but no different with 1.53t which I
used before.
I installed PGP 6.5.8 for NT (running Win2k). I had PGP 6.0.2
installed before. PGP itself works fine, I created my own private key
(a new one with 6.5.8, as I had some strange problems with the old key
before), have imported public keys from other people and so on. No problem.
Now, when I sign my mails with the new key (6.5.8) I get the
following:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.0.2i

OlL9zB1t+TvgotNtq[...]
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Why does it show 6.0.2i instead of 6.5.8?? I have all three PGPdlls in
my TB-folder. If I remove the one for 5.5 and 6.5 I can still choose
Version 6.0/6.5 in choose openPGP version but if I remove (only) the
dll for 6.0 I can't choose that option anymore and I can't send my
mail when I choose to sign it! Something does not seem to be right...
Downloading the dll-zip again did not help.
Can anyone tell me what the problem is? I have other people (using TB)
who run PGP 6.5.8 and it shows that version in the signature
correctly.

And: I can't open the PGPkeys through Tools-OpenPGP-OpenPGP key
manager. I get an unable to locate the PGPkeys application. What am
I doing wrong here?! :-)

Plus: why do I sometimes have strange characters before the
PGP-Signature? I think somebody actually asked that before and there
was no solution to it?

Thanks,

Alexander


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: PGP-problems with TB

2001-10-31 Thread David van Zuijlekom

Hello Alexander,

Wednesday, October 31, 2001, 10:49:48 AM, you wrote:

AL Why does it show 6.0.2i instead of 6.5.8??

You have to manually edit the pgp65.dll with a Hex-editor and replace
the version number (standard this is 6.5i as I recall correctly) with
6.5.8. Then if you sign a message you'll have the correct version
number.

-- 
Best regards,
 David


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: PGP-problems with TB

2001-10-31 Thread Alexander Levenetz

Hello David,


 You have to manually edit the pgp65.dll with a Hex-editor

Why is that so? Couldn't that be corrected in a new dll?

 and replace the version number (standard this is 6.5i as I recall
 correctly) with 6.5.8.

Well, that didn't work. But if that is the only reason why the numbers
don't match then it doesn't really matter, I guess?

Greetings,
Alexander


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com