Re[2]: RE checkbox in 'options'?

2000-08-30 Thread ztrader

On Tuesday, August 29, 2000, 9:52:16 PM, you wrote:

JA One has to check Regular Expressions when one is using regular
JA expressions.  Check out the help file, it does deal with regular
JA expressions fairly well.

It has a nice summary of RE's, I agree. The confusion, for me, comes
from mixing RE chrs with other concepts. For example, the [ ] and |
chrs are RE chrs as well. Since these are used in 'signal strings',
and so are RE's, I  wondered if one had to check the RE box to
actually get []| to work correctly.

What do you do to use BOTH "special syntax", as seems to be required,
AND RE, for example, since both use the same chrs?

Thanks,
ztradermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: RE checkbox in 'options'?

2000-08-30 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi ztrader,

On 30 August 2000 at 06:21:47 GMT -0700 (which was 14:21 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "RE checkbox in 'options'?":

JA One  has  to  check Regular Expressions when one is using regular
JA expressions.  Check  out the help file, it does deal with regular
JA expressions fairly well.

z It has a nice summary of RE's, I agree. The confusion, for me, comes
z from mixing RE chrs with other concepts. For example, the [ ] and |
z chrs are RE chrs as well. Since these are used in 'signal strings',
z and so are RE's, I  wondered if one had to check the RE box to
z actually get []| to work correctly.

z What do you do to use BOTH "special syntax", as seems to be required,
z AND RE, for example, since both use the same chrs?

They are mutually exclusive :-). Either you use special characters for
simple  logic  or you use regular expressions (which do everything the
specials do and *then* some) for more complex pattern matching.

- --
Cheers,
.\\arck

Marck D. Pearlstone | Moderator TBUDL / TBBETA  
 PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com  
 PGP Key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=GET%20MARCKKEY 

 Kids Stuff:
Thunder is a rich source of loudness.

TB! v1.46 Beta/3 S/N 14F4B4B2 on Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8 Secured
Comment: PGP Sealed for freshness!

iQA/AwUBOa0OHjnkJKuSnc2gEQKJ5gCfSy5nOKpYvfuW5oucWQgDQj36CK0AoKye
+mmJqAWWQedlHH0y7U2FhoVF
=ENP0
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: RE checkbox in 'options'?

2000-08-30 Thread Ming-Li

On Wednesday, August 30, 2000, 6:21:47 AM, ztrader wrote:

 It has a nice summary of RE's, I agree. The confusion, for me,
 comes from mixing RE chrs with other concepts. For example, the [
 ] and | chrs are RE chrs as well. Since these are used in 'signal
 strings', and so are RE's, I  wondered if one had to check the RE
 box to actually get []| to work correctly.

No. And it's inherently clear if you understand how the two search
methods work. Many don't, however, and I agree that the help file
could be made clearer.

 What do you do to use BOTH "special syntax", as seems to be required,
 AND RE, for example, since both use the same chrs?

In the case of pipe (vertical bar) character, it means "OR" with or
without RE, so it doesn't matter.

Square bracket pair does mean different things, and if RE is
enabled, the special usage of RE preempts the non-RE usage. The
reason is simple.

With simple search (without RE), square bracket pair means "whole
word match" or "exact match", in contrast to "partial match", which
is the default, with or without RE. I.e., a filter string of "ztrad"
(without the quotation marks) would match "ztrader". With simple
search, you use a square bracket pair to prevent that. With RE, you
have several ways to achieve the same effect (e.g., ^ztrad$), and
square brackets are reserved for another purpose.

Don't worry if you find RE complicated. Many do. You don't really
need to be an expert (I'm certainly not one) to make good use of it.
Of course, the better you get hold of it, the more power it gives
you. But for most users, a little knowledge of it would be enough to
achieve what we want.

-- 
Best regards,
Ming-Li

The Bat! 1.46 Beta/3 | Win2k SP1

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re[2]: RE checkbox in 'options'?

2000-08-30 Thread ztrader

On Wednesday, August 30, 2000, 6:37:23 AM, you wrote:

MDP They are mutually exclusive :-). Either you use special characters for
MDP simple  logic  or you use regular expressions (which do everything the
MDP specials do and *then* some) for more complex pattern matching.

A reworded version of the above would be a nice addition to the help
file :-). From the many helpful replies on this list, the concept
behind TB is becoming clear to me.

I assume that the and/or relationship between 'rules' and
'alternatives' also holds when using RE's - true?

An interface thought... If the RE box is checked, the 'rules' and
'alternatives' tabs are replaced by a single RE tab. This might be
more clear and avoid confusion between the two. Also would give a
larger area for complex RE's to be seen and edited.

Thought 2... Would it be possible to use an add-on to do part of
the filtering? I now have a procmail script (not mine) that does a
great job of 'scoring' spam by numeric techniques. It will spot spam,
even when addressed directly to me, perhaps 80-90% of the time. If
this could be included in TB it would be a killer add-on, IMHO. Would
it possible to run perl, or VB, or ??, for example, "inside" TB?

Thanks,
ztradermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: RE checkbox in 'options'?

2000-08-30 Thread A . Curtis Martin

On Wed, 30 Aug 2000 07:21:38 -0700, ztrader wrote:
snip
z An interface thought... If the RE box is checked, the 'rules' and
z 'alternatives' tabs are replaced by a single RE tab. This might be
z more clear and avoid confusion between the two. Also would give a
z larger area for complex RE's to be seen and edited.

You may still wish to filter using more than one regular expression so
the 'AND' and 'Alternative' string support shouldn't be removed when
RE's are being used.

-- 
-=A. Curtis Martin=-
Using TB! v1.46 Beta/3 «» Win2k Pro SP1
Moderator TBUDL/TBBETA  |  PGP Key ID: 0xEE079937
PGP Key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendAlliePGPKey

"Portable: survives system reboot. "

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: RE checkbox in 'options'?

2000-08-29 Thread Januk Aggarwal

Hello ztrader,


On  Tuesday, August 29, 2000  at  20:31:04 GMT -0700 (which was 8:31 PM
where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:

 When does one have to check the Regular Expressions box in the options
 section of a rule? What does it do?

One has to check Regular Expressions when one is using regular
expressions.  Check out the help file, it does deal with regular
expressions fairly well.  If you need help with a more specific
expression, there are some RE gurus on this list.

To find the help in the help file, select

 Help - Help Topics

 Then under the contents tab, select Regular expressions.  For some
 reason, this topic is not accessible from the Index tab.
 


-- 
Thanks for writing,
 Januk Aggarwal
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Using The Bat! 1.46 Beta/3
 under Windows 98 4.10 Build   A 

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org