Re: SOT: Gaping hole in NAI PGP

2000-08-25 Thread Oliver Sturm

Hi Deryk Lister,

On Saturday, August 26, 2000 at 1:12:49 AM you wrote:

 If I understand this right, it basically makes PGP almost completely
 worthless. A public key can be tweaked whilst keeping the fingerprint
 the same, and then re-uploaded to the keyservers or handed out to
 others on your behalf. If someone sends mail to this tweaked key, you
 can still decode it - but so can the cracker! There's not a lot you
 can do about it; all keys made with Nai's PGP 5 or greater have this
 flaw.

That's  nonsense, sorry. The bug is only related to the ADK-technology
in those PGP versions. That's a technology that enables, say, the boss
of a company to create custom keys for his employees while retaining a
second key (or backdoor) for himself. This (intended) functionality is
somehow  flawed,  hence  the vulnerability. This doesn't in any way at
all  effect  the  effectiveness  of  PGP encryption in any single-user
day-to-day use. I'm citing the article from BUGTRAQ, which contains
some links about the issue.

From  [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 In case you have not heard there is a serious bug in some versions of PGP
 related to additonal decryption keys (ADK).
 For more information look at John Young's site which details some of this:
 http://cryptome.org/pgp-badbug.htm
 
 Quoting from an email on the site:
 
 "Tested versions of PGP:
 PGP-2.6.3ia UNIX   (not vulnerable - doesn't support V4 signatures)
 PGP-5.0i UNIX  (not vulnerable)
 PGP-5.5.3i WINDOWS (VULNERABLE)
 PGP-6.5.1i WINDOWS (VULNERABLE)
 GnuPG-1.0.1 UNIX   (not vulnerable)"
 
 A paper detailing an aspect of the vulnerability is written by Ralf
 Senderek: http://senderek.de/security/key-experiments.html and his student
 Stephen Early [EMAIL PROTECTED] seems to have worked on
 detailing this vulnerability as well on the ukcrypto mailing list.




Oliver Sturm

-- 
% \(-
(-: Command not found.
-- 
Oliver Sturm / [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Key ID: 71D86996
Fingerprint: 8085 5C52 60B8 EFBD DAD0  78B8 CE7F 38D7 71D8 6996

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: SOT: Gaping hole in NAI PGP

2000-08-25 Thread Oliver Sturm

Hi Oliver Sturm,

;)

On Saturday, August 26, 2000 at 1:28:28 AM you wrote:

 That's  nonsense, sorry. The bug is only related to the ADK-technology
 in those PGP versions. That's a technology that enables, say, the boss
 of a company to create custom keys for his employees while retaining a
 second key (or backdoor) for himself. This (intended) functionality is
 somehow  flawed,  hence  the vulnerability. This doesn't in any way at
 all  effect  the  effectiveness  of  PGP encryption in any single-user
 day-to-day use. I'm citing the article from BUGTRAQ, which contains
 some links about the issue.

OK,  I  was  obviously  slightly  mistaken on some parts of this.
It  might actually be possible to read someone else's email exploiting
this  bug.  Still  seems  highly  surrealistic to me, I just wanted to
follow up to correct my bold statement.

Oliver Sturm

-- 
%make love
Make:  Don't know how to make love.  Stop.
-- 
Oliver Sturm / [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Key ID: 71D86996
Fingerprint: 8085 5C52 60B8 EFBD DAD0  78B8 CE7F 38D7 71D8 6996

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: SOT: Gaping hole in NAI PGP

2000-08-25 Thread Oliver Sturm

Hi Oliver Sturm,

Following myself up a last time ;)

On Saturday, August 26, 2000 at 1:37:36 AM you wrote:

If you are very interested in this issue, read

http://www.pgp.com/other/advisories/adk.asp

Seems like NAI tries to be real fast for a change ;)


Oliver Sturm

-- 
Linux: The Ultimate NT Service Pack
-- 
Oliver Sturm / [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Key ID: 71D86996
Fingerprint: 8085 5C52 60B8 EFBD DAD0  78B8 CE7F 38D7 71D8 6996

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org





Re: SOT Gaping hole in NAI PGP

2000-08-25 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Oliver,

On 26 August 2000 at 02:04:07 GMT +0200 (which was 01:04 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "Gaping hole in NAI PGP":

 I  got  the  impression  that  the  hole  is  created  with the key
 generation and that to eliminate the potential problem we'd have to
 upgrade as well as generate new keys.

OS Read  http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-2000-18.html,  that's the best
OS explanation I've seen.

For  the sake of clarity, here are the highlights of the vulnerability
issues that pertain:

   For this vulnerability to be exploited, the following conditions
   must hold:

   the sender must be using a vulnerable version of PGP

   the sender must be encrypting data with a certificate modified
   by the attacker

   the sender must acknowledge a warning dialog that an ADK is
   associated with the certificate

   the sender must already have the key for the bogus ADK on their
   local keyring

   the bogus ADK must be a certificate signed by a CA that the
   sender trusts

   the attacker must be able to obtain the ciphertext sent from
   the sender to the victim

- - --
Cheers,
.\\arck

Marck D. Pearlstone | Moderator TBUDL / TBBETA  
 PGP Key ID: 0x929DCDA0 | www: http://www.silverstones.com  
 PGP Key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=GET%20MARCKKEY 

 File not found. Should I fake it? (Y/N)


TB! v1.46 Beta/3 S/N 14F4B4B2 on Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998

- -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5i
Comment: PGP Signed so you know it's really me

iQA/AwUBOacPFjnkJKuSnc2gEQItjACfeozXqjC9mFFumGf2rJjERe3VzAkAn3cq
8lq7dE9uBRpO5A3gRIbRO4QT
=wbx5
- -END PGP SIGNATURE-

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5i
Comment: PGP Signed so you know it's really me

iQA/AwUBOacPKTnkJKuSnc2gEQJaXQCg0jwL7QLfh+MQACskay5nzhshfjoAnA2C
yK+3b9UFZjBudfmk81CVgOYe
=ZBWc
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org