Re[2]: Expanding all threads in a folder
> +<(num)*> expands all threads, whereas +<(num)+> expands > the particular thread. My TB! requires only + or - on the NumPad without Ctrl to expand/collapse the current thread below the selected mail. * on the numpad expands/collapses all the threads in the folder. -- Gabor Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Expanding all threads in a folder
Hello Peter, Wednesday, August 25, 2004, 11:23:05 AM, you wrote: > +<(num)*> expands all threads, whereas +<(num)+> expands > the particular thread. Do you know how to get this to work (expand all threads) on a laptop computer. I use [Ctrl][Shft][+] to expand a thread. -- Thanks, Terry Using the Bat! 2.12.00 under Windows XP Service Pack 1 2600 Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Expanding all threads in a folder
Hello Thomas, Wednesday, August 25, 2004, 9:26:17 AM, you wrote: > I don't think so. Over here, it expands all threads. I am confused. Does this expand all threads in a folder (which was the subject) or just all messages in a thread? -- Thanks, Terry Using the Bat! 2.12.00 under Windows XP Service Pack 1 2600 Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: Expanding all threads in a folder
Hello Thomas, Friday, July 30, 2004, 7:52:14 AM, you wrote: TF> Hello Dan, TF> On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:33:07 -0400 GMT (30/07/2004, 20:33 +0700 GMT), TF> Dan Grunberg wrote: DG>> I can't seem to use |Shift| + |Ctrl| + |*| to expand all threads in a DG>> list of messages. TB's Help says it should work, but it doesn't. TF> I use crtl-* (no shift) and it works. You have to use the asterisk on TF> the numpad, not the one above the 8. For me, CTRL + * only works to a certain "depth" of replies in the message list. Once there, I will see another plus sign and will have to use CTRL + * again to expand the remainder of the thread. I'm fairly certain others have commented about this in the past, but I've never heard whether that's the way it's supposed to be or not. Do you know? -- Best regards, Quin Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
