Re[2]: GPGshell
Hello Allie, Saturday, May 22, 2004, 6:27:34 PM, you wrote: AM> There a couple annoying limitations though. If you use a single key AM> and don't use multiple identities, sender , then you AM> shouldn't have any problems with these limitations. So, just for signing messages, what is the best path right now. I have 9 email addresses. Is PGP 6 or 8 or GNUPG the best from simplicity and integration -- Best regards, Michaelmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 2.10.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: GPGshell
Hello Allie, Saturday, May 22, 2004, 6:27:34 PM, you wrote: AM> There a couple annoying limitations though. If you use a single key AM> and don't use multiple identities, sender , then you AM> shouldn't have any problems with these limitations. Also, I cannot verify your signature with gpg. Any ideas? -- Best regards, Michaelmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 2.10.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: GPGshell
Hello Allie, Saturday, May 22, 2004, 6:39:37 PM, you wrote: AM> PGP 6 to 8 integration is the most straightforward though. I have less AM> problems when using it especially when it comes to encrypting and AM> decrypting. OK, I am dumpinh gpg and going with the free version of 8. I am running XP, and they say 8 is the only version that works with XP. I know that 6 is as good, does not use services and uses lest memory, so I am going to try 6.5 also and see which is better for me. -- Best regards, Michaelmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 2.10.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: GPGshell
Hello Allie, Saturday, May 22, 2004, 6:40:19 PM, you wrote: AM> Michael L. Wilson, [MLW] wrote: AM>>> There a couple annoying limitations though. If you use a single key AM>>> and don't use multiple identities, sender , then you AM>>> shouldn't have any problems with these limitations. MLW>> Also, I cannot verify your signature with gpg. Any ideas? AM> What happens when you try to verify it? Do you have my key on your AM> keyring? I do not have your key (yet) in my keyring. After I install 6 I will import your key and try again. -- Best regards, Michaelmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 2.10.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: GPGshell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Allie, Saturday, May 22, 2004, 6:51:25 PM, you wrote: AM> Michael L. Wilson, [MLW] wrote: MLW>> OK, I am dumpinh gpg and going with the free version of 8. I am MLW>> running XP, and they say 8 is the only version that works with XP. I MLW>> know that 6 is as good, does not use services and uses lest memory, MLW>> so I am going to try 6.5 also and see which is better for me. AM> I don't wish to scare you away from GnuPG. You may find that it works AM> well enough for you. :) You can have both GnuPG and PGP installed on AM> the same machine without problems. In this way, you can easily switch AM> which of them TB! integrates with. I tend to use GnuPG at times, but AM> find myself switching back to using PGP v8 integration. However, needs AM> and temperament vary. You may very well prefer GnuPG once you have it AM> working. Here is a signed message, see if you can do anything with it. - -- Best regards, Michaelmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP SDK 3.0.3 Comment: "" iQA/AwUBQLAKi22u7N+Qh+ieEQKc5ACg7k0rmnl0Q581bciUdSUJ0zx/1KYAoIag 2tf/oaO7/VK6xECIJEF4qPal =N5tq -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 2.10.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: GPGshell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Allie, Sunday, May 23, 2004, 11:07:05 AM, Allie Martin wrote: ML>> I don't recall seeing a .dll file for PGP v8 available from ML>> Ritlabs either. AM> The support is integrated in the executable, i.e., support for v5-8. Ahhh, so I see. Thanks for the pointer. ML>> Also, I prefer to "clearsign" my messages; I was wondering if there ML>> was a way for me to have TB! default to "OFF" for PGP/Mime, instead of ML>> "Auto". Perhaps an .ini file entry? AM> You can use the macro %nopgpmime in your templates. There's no global AM> switch for disabling PGP/MIME. I'll give this a try; again, thanks. AM> Why do you wish to clearsign? Compatibility? AM> Nowadays, I only clearsign when I'm uncertain that my recipients have AM> a PGP/MIME capable clients and know that they plan to check the AM> signature. Yes, specifically for compatibility with 'text-only' systems. They give fits with the mime encoded attachment of a message body. And to one of the moderators: Is the following signature delimiter correct? - -- * * Best regards, * Marc. * New Orleans, LA (USA) * FIDONET=1:396/45 INTELEC=239:600/70 * INTERNET: marc.lewis at sstar dot com * TELNET://sursum-corda.com * BBS, DATA & FAX: 1-504-897-6006 * -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5i iQA/AwUBQLEcfPku/tz1Eg1XEQK27wCfUriooIsa+VhUjWaKOV66QqjWuL4An0M7 TgDGlbHkXudaJlW2sUCct1Tu =CSy3 -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 2.10.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: GPGshell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Marck, Sunday, May 23, 2004, 4:55:16 PM, Marck D Pearlstone wrote: ML>> And to one of the moderators: Is the following signature delimiter ML>> correct? MDP> Yes - perfect ... but .. MDP> FYI - the bad wrapping above is caused by allowing PGP to reformat the MDP> message when signing. For the best results, turn off wrapping in the MDP> PGP preferences[...] Before shutting it off completely, I've reset the margin in PGP to 78 instead of 70. If it still fouls things I'll shut it off. - -- * * Best regards, * Marc. * New Orleans, LA (USA) * FIDONET=1:396/45 INTELEC=239:600/70 * INTERNET: marc.lewis at sstar dot com * TELNET://sursum-corda.com * BBS, DATA & FAX: 1-504-897-6006 * -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5i iQA/AwUBQLEkAvku/tz1Eg1XEQL+fQCgzbwrf0FF+W92+2b4/JPKWv+bsRUAni77 zvvynYrXWcqtfqSKs4saKcLm =MKlW -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 2.10.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
