Re[2]: NOD32 v2 question
Hello Marck, Friday, July 11, 2003, 6:51:54 AM, you wrote: MDP Yes, it's working well for inbound mail. It's the outbound mail MDP check that's failing. Sorry about that. You still don't need the plug in. The AMON will catch the virus infected file if you try to attach the file using the BAT's attach a file command. Try one with an infected file (I usually use Eicar.com for testing), and the alert will show up. -- Best regards, Kennethmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: NOD32 v2 question
On Friday, July 11, 2003 at 11:52 AM, Marck wrote: NOD32 have just released v2, but the TB plug-in isn't working right when using it to check outbound mail with attachments. Is there a way to configure it to work correctly? Is there a new plug-in for v2? If so, do you know where I can download it from? If not, I was under the impression that the old plug-in didn't work with v2. Does it? -- Terry Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 3 Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: NOD32 v2 question
Hello Marck, Friday, July 11, 2003, 7:27:38 AM, you wrote: MDP It's not for me - I use AVG. It's for someone who wants his MDP outbound messages certified virus free by NOD. NOD is saying that MDP the attachment is not valid and stalling the mail send. I see. Interesting. This has never happened to me with a good attachment. I believe the current plug-in is not compatible with v. 2. As I said, I have never had a need for the plug-in after I upgraded to v.2. -- Best regards, Kennethmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: NOD32 v2 question
On Friday, July 11, 2003 at 2:22 PM, Marck wrote: It seems to work for incoming mail, just not for outbound. That's why I was asking the question in the first place. It wasn't clear to me that you were using the old plug-in. Wishful thinking on my part that there was a new one. :) Thanks for clarifying. -- Best Regards, Terry Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 3 Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: NOD32 v2 question
Hello ravi, Friday, July 11, 2003, 10:14:43 AM, you wrote: r How about forwarding an an infected message including the r attachment? r A virus could have been received and not detected prior to a r signature update. Assuming you are forwarding a message that has already been scanned, it should have been caught during incoming. If it didn't, even outgoing scan won't catch it. -- Best regards, Kennethmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re[2]: NOD32 v2 question
Hello ravi, Friday, July 11, 2003, 11:23:18 AM, you wrote: r As I said, one could have received a virus before the virus r signature was updated to detect it. Yes, I got it. That would be possible, but likely for me. I would really have to be out of my mind to forward a message to someone with an attachment that I didn't either know about or didn't open to read/check. -- Best regards, Kennethmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
