Re[2]: New version

[John Phillips]

Hello

"Jody Watts" wrote  On Thu, 1 Mar 2001, at 02:55:49 [GMT -0600] (19:55 Australian 
Eastern Time,Thursday):


> http://www.ritlabs.com/the_bat/beta.html

Cannot find server or DNS Error


-- 
Regards
John Phillips Sydney, Australia
Hamster 1.3.22.1   Bat! 1.49 Windows 98 4.10 Build   ASony Vaio Notebook 
PCG-505TS Pentium 300 64meg ram

Typed on my Ultra Megger Wallet Whammer.



-- 
__
Archives   : 
Moderators : 
TBTech List: 
Unsubscribe: 

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org

Re[2]: New version

[Viboon Chaojirapant]

> From: Dierk Haasis [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

> About half an hour ago (some minutes more) the http server was up and
> going - very fast. Since then I am on BETA ...

Hard to believe isn't it that even TBUDL can /. a
site :).

-- 
Cheers,
Viboon

-- 
__
Archives   : 
Moderators : 
TBTech List: 
Unsubscribe: 

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org

Re[2]: New version

[George F Schoelles]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

Hello Reuven,

Friday, March 02, 2001, 6:23:08 AM, you wrote:

R> I just downloaded and installed the beta version 1.51. From the first
R> glance I couldn't see any difference. What is indeed
R> better/improved/new in 1.51?

The installer tells you of changes before you install, the
download page has a readme file and I bet there'll be a txt info
file in the program directory if I look.

Did you look?

Sorry...couldn't resist.

- --
Best regards,
 George   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

**
*Thawte authorized WOT Notary  * ICQ: 122492 *
**

I have a rock garden. 3 of them died last week. 

Finger: [EMAIL PROTECTED] for keys

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8 - Any greater version may have back door
Comment: PGP used for privacy and authentication

iQEVAwUBOp+u5zYFY6kvWSqxAQEmwQf+OYWnH5yspcbkvXA/53DYZYz+e6pGQPE0
koyBXoQsgmTbPqdGxt8GHi2kJVncmT6ERPwhkj1XT7TtmQRDMwuO+0y6NBmk5Cbw
gPsDvkFbT3TG5E0SEpZjR0B9L6OBUWFJ7on+doBF/0mGsGBrA1sPLgI+IxP9jg35
E6lyh8KG8ZU1p+XtPOaXIrvfjfrLSz+SQQtaX0WhFPooZw1s8aSpANH6JHxPZIPK
s4GUAlvgYHf1T7RmtdtpOjIi4jWokyG8m6rgk1hnCOQx/u+NQO30IFmA/MDVlzID
aegCn1m3Tmh8mEckSTyMfjltcgVlhZaUiKqFRn5K16FEG26eVF2wBg==
=3Xm9
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
__
Archives   : 
Moderators : 
TBTech List: 
Unsubscribe: 

You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org

Re[2]: New version threading

[Steve Lee]

> So, I'm glad you like it. I've just been informed, via a post on
> tbbeta, that the new beta series is already beginning.

> Come over and help us, if you want to. :)


I would love to but as with VA I never got involved with the beta
program because my data is too previous and I dare not risk corruption
or loss.



-- 
Best wishes,


Steve Lee
http://jumbocruiser.com
Tel +44 7768 211612



Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: New version threading

[Steve Lee]

> So at least we have one channel through which to reap the
> benefit of your expertise.  

I would not be so arrogant as to assume I had expertise but thank you
for that compliment. 

-- 
Best wishes,


Steve Lee
http://jumbocruiser.com
Tel +44 7768 211612



Current version is 3.5 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: New Version Spotted 2.01.3

[Lourdes Jones]

Hello Steve,

Monday, October 20, 2003, 5:02:05 PM, Steve Thomas wrote:
JD>> And this has the aforementioned X-Mailer on/off toggle.
Steve Thomas> Where is it?

Options -> preferences -> general
  last checkbox

-- 
Best regards,
 Lourdes

The Bat! 2.01.3 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1




Current version is 2.01.3 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: New Version Spotted 2.01.3

[Jim D]

On 10/20/2003, in  Steve
Thomas said:

JD>> And this has the aforementioned X-Mailer on/off toggle.

> Where is it?

Options | Preferences

It's the last checkbox. It was unchecked already on mine (meaning it's
_not_ sending X-Mailer header by default).


-- 
Best regards,
 Jim D JD -at- CastleGK -dot- com
 [Using The Bat! 2.01.3 on Windows XP Service Pack 1 Build 2600]
---
"I need this parade like I need a hole in the head." -John F. Kennedy
---



Current version is 2.01.3 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: New Version Spotted 2.01.3

[Peter Ouwehand]

Hello Jonathan Angliss,

on 2003-10-21, 07:41, you wrote (at least in part):



JA> Unfortunately I doubt it, if anything was attempted, they would
JA> probably be able to get away on a technicality on what the software is
JA> designed to do, and not what the software is being used to. After all,
JA> software writers cannot always be held accountable for the software
JA> they write if done in good intentions. For example, they could claim
JA> that the software was originally designed to be used to send mail to
JA> willing participants. Unless you can prove otherwise, the software is
JA> just being miss-used (just like TB could be with the mass-mailer
JA> option).

You were talking about De'ja Vu?
Saw this one coming along about a half hour ago, with the same
'Created' time.
Mailing-list problems maybe?

-- 
Kind regards,
ouwehand dot net
Peter Ouwehand
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- - - - -
Using The Bat! V2.01.7
On Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4



Current version is 2.01.3 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: New Version Spotted 2.01.3

[Joan Josep]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hello Jonathan,


 On Sun, 26 Oct 2003, at 00:45:57 [GMT -0500]
 (which was 26/10/2003 (D/M/Y) 6:45 where I live) you wrote:

JA> I wish I could say it was my mail servers fault, unfortunately I
JA> cannot, it's TB!. It's duplicating mail in my sent folder, and not
JA> sending any mail, when I try forcing a send of my own, it sends the
JA> duplicates. However I cannot remove the duplicates (manually, or by
JA> using kill dupes). So I'm reluctant to use TB at the moment :/

This  comes  in  very  handy when we people are waiting to decide to
upgrade to v2 or not.

- --
Best regards,
Joan Josep

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 6.5.8ckt - build 08
Comment: KeyID: 0xF6A61F93

iQA/AwUBP5uHw97hKWb2ph+TEQL22ACfTAnGKcj9RKJ1fkhk75eJEak2mKMAn1fs
chaf/g9QVG3mMTIqx5XEP9kt
=SLuB
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Current version is 2.01.3 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: New Version Spotted 2.01.3

[Jonathan Angliss]

Hello Allie,

Sunday, October 26, 2003, 5:06:38 AM, you wrote:

JJ>> This comes in very handy when we people are waiting to decide to
JJ>> upgrade to v2 or not.

AM> I'm pretty much enjoying v2 here. I think Jonathan is using IMAP
AM> accounts exclusively. The new IMAP support is still in the
AM> teething stages and it would appear that its performance varies
AM> greatly depending on the IMAP server it interacts with. So, if
AM> you're using POP, you'll not be experiencing Jonathan's problems.

I should have made this a little clear. Allie is correct. I am using
IMAP accounts exclusively, it is suppose to make my life easier and
what not ;) I'm currently trying a complete fresh install on a never
used system to see if there are some odd settings I have checked are
causing some issues.

-- 
Best regards,
 Jonathanmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Current version is 2.01.3 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: New Version Spotted 2.01.3

[Jonathan Angliss]

Hello MAU,

Sunday, October 26, 2003, 3:53:31 AM, you wrote:

>> I wish I could say it was my mail servers fault, unfortunately I
>> cannot, it's TB!. It's duplicating mail in my sent folder, and not
>> sending any mail, when I try forcing a send of my own, it sends the
>> duplicates. However I cannot remove the duplicates (manually, or by
>> using kill dupes). So I'm reluctant to use TB at the moment :/

M> I assume so but, are you sure you are using v2.01.3 ?

This has been an ongoing thing since the 2.0 beta series, still
exists, I'm using the latest beta, and I'm testing if it does it
again.

>> Eugh, and when will they make it so that if PGP isn't installed,
>> and you have the "sign on complete" checked, it either tells you,
>> or ignores the check... *grumbles*

M> You must have some kind of corrupt installation or registry
M> settings. I never use PGP but I have just selected "Sign on
M> complete" and it is totally ignored.

Go to the account options, check the "Use OpenPGP", and "Sign on
complete".  When I have these checked, TB doesn't do anything when I
hit send.

As a note on this, I've just installed TB on my new laptop, this
laptop hasn't had TB installed before (only just installed Windows on
thursday), I don't have my registration key put in yet, this is very
much an "out of the box" IMAP install. I've not changed any settings
(except the two mentioned above) to see if I still get this bad
behaviour.


-- 
Best regards,
 Jonathanmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Current version is 2.01.3 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Re[2]: New Version Spotted 2.01.3

[Jonathan Angliss]

>> Unfortunately I doubt it, if anything was attempted, they would
>> probably be able to get away on a technicality on what the software is
>> designed to do, and not what the software is being used to.

> You were talking about De'ja Vu?
> Saw this one coming along about a half hour ago, with the same
> 'Created' time.
> Mailing-list problems maybe?

No... TB problems... it will not send emails properly for me, and when it
does, it sends many copies of it... *grumbles* I just hit the tbtech list
with about 9 copies of an email I sent the other day.

-- 
Jonathan Angliss
([EMAIL PROTECTED])


Current version is 2.01.3 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: New Version updates... 1.60m... Groan

[Julius S.]

Hi there, Nick,

Wednesday, May 22, 2002, 12:11:35 AM, you wrote:



NA> Julius, 1.60m I believe was a full install so all you had to do was double
NA> click on it. Why don't you just pull it out of your TB Directory, put it
NA> in a Temp Directory somewhere and simply double click on it. It should
NA> over write your current executable without any problem.

Nick, you are right!! I back-tracked and double-clicked on it in my Download
folder and it's now installed.

Thanks for the tip.

Still don't get any prompts on the toolbar buttons. Been trying to fix with
ver 160c, 160k, and now with 160m. No luck. Button darkens, but no prompt
and I have to guess at what pictogram in button means... usually
screw-up... groan!!


-- 
Cheers,
 Julius



Current Ver: 1.60m
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com

Re[2]: New Version updates... 1.60m... Groan

[RapidFX]

Hello...
If you can't figure it out from my post

Wednesday, May 22, 2002, 10:15:13 AM, you wrote:
G> Hi RapidFX,
G>  and your point being that ..?

G> ON Wednesday, May 22, 2002, 6:50:38 PM, you wrote:
R>> Hello...
R>> I have ran TheBat! for years now and have never ever had any issues
R>> like the ones people post here.
R>> I know that means nothing to those that do seem to have issues, but
R>> I just fail to understand how you all run into these problems. I have
R>> used TheBat! on Win95, Win98, Win98se, Win2kPro, Win2kServer, WinXP.
R>> I have used many many versions, Beta and release.
R>> I've updated, installed new, dragged my "mail" folder back to new
R>> setups.. Everything goes smooth.
R>> Never had any issues.


- --
Greg S. Wirth
System Administrator
Anchorage, Alaska

http://rapidfx.com
http://rapidfx.org
http://dejapc.com

IpFilter // FreeBSD // Apache



Current Ver: 1.60m
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com

Re[2]: New Version updates... 1.60m... Groan

[Bill Blinn, Technology Editor]

It seems that RapidFX said ...

R> I have ran TheBat! for years now and have never ever had any issues
R> like the ones people post here.

I, too, have been using The Bat for several years. Some programs have
a more modern interface (Eudora, for example) but are nowhere near as
flexible as The Bat. I understand, though, how a new user could be
left dazed by the wealth of opportunities this program offers. I have
found no other e-mail program on this planet that even comes close to
offering The Bat's abilities. The downside is what new users
experience -- they are simply overwhelmed.

Reading the documentation would help, but not as much as it should
because the documentation is far too sparse. The on-line FAQ helps and
so does this discussion list.

I spent last weekend using Eudora exclusively for a report I'm working
on and continuously found things that I could not do. On Monday, when
I returned to The Bat, everything felt right again.

Using The Bat! v1.60m on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 

--
Bill Blinn, Technology Editor ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - 5/22/2002 at 1:08 PM
Technology Corner on Newsradio 610 WTVN, Columbus, Ohio
Direct: 614-785-9359   Fax: 630-604-9842
http://wtvn.blinn.com http://www.wtvn.com
Random thought: "I don't get even, I get odder." -- Anonymous



Current Ver: 1.60m
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com

Re[2]: New Version updates... 1.60m... Groan

[RapidFX]

Hello...
No, and I never said anything like that.
I said, I do not understand how so many seem to have
problems, (crashes, buttons missing, emails being deleted)
when myself and others at our office never have.
It was not intended to be any sort of insult, or to pump up my ego.
I was just stating a fact, that Thebat! has been installed many times,
on many OS versions, on beta OS's. beta TheBat!...etc..
and never failed me.
I started using TheBat! at 1.53d and never looked back.


Wednesday, May 22, 2002, 11:27:33 AM, you wrote:
G> ON Wednesday, May 22, 2002, 8:25:14 PM, you wrote:
R>> Hello...
R>> If you can't figure it out from my post
G> I was just wondering if you were saying we are all dumbo's who don't get
G> it, or that you are just incredibly smart.

--
Greg S. Wirth
System Administrator
Anchorage, Alaska



Current Ver: 1.60m
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com

Re[2]: New Version updates... 1.60m... Groan

[RapidFX]

Hello...

First off, do not put words in my mouth.
You do not know of what you speak.
I am amazed at all the people who took offense to my post.
I got a lot of off-list emails from some not so happy humans.
I am sorry if you all took my post to be some sort of insult on all
the people who have problems.
Looking at my original post, I see some sort of statement such as
this:

"I know that means nothing to those that do seem to have issues..."

I am tired of seeing so many posts from people spewing that "TheBat!
did this evil thing to my system", or "If this isn't fixed, I am going
back to FREE OE blah blah.."
Reading through the past two weeks, I don't see a lot of positive
remarks about TheBat! so I posted one. I hear people at work talking
bad about TheBat!, I hear people on the list talking bad. I was tired
of it and I posted, what I thought was positive, remarks on my years
of use of TheBat!
I made an attempt to defend what I think is a GREAT product.
Far much more than any other email client.
Now go get some coffee and stop worrying that I may have somehow tried
to insult you.


Thursday, May 23, 2002, 7:29:51 AM, you wrote:
NA> There have been many positive Postings about TB in this List, but this
NA> individual wrote in effect: I do not have any problems with TB so I do not
NA> understand why everyone else is having problems. It served no purpose
NA> whatsoever other than to 'slight' those having problems... an underlying
NA> suggestion that it was their incompetence that was at fault.


--
Greg S. Wirth
System Administrator
Anchorage, Alaska



Current Ver: 1.60m
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com

Re[2]: New Version updates... 1.60m... Groan

[Julius S.]

Hi there, Graeme,

Thursday, May 23, 2002, 7:16:02 AM, you wrote:

GJH> Julius,

>> Still don't get any prompts on the toolbar buttons. Been trying to fix with
>> ver 160c, 160k, and now with 160m. No luck. Button darkens, but no prompt
>> and I have to guess at what pictogram in button means... usually
>> screw-up... groan!!

GJH>   What version of Windows are you running? Older versions of Windows
GJH>   (95, 98) need their common control DLL's upgrading for toolbars and
GJH>   buttons in some applications to work properly. I have no idea if
GJH>   this affects TB! but it certainly caught me out with some of my
GJH>   development projects in the past.

Good point. Am running Windows ME and have IE 6.0.2600.   Machine is 1.2
AMD with 256MB.

Will see if I can get new DLL upgrade on MS site.
Surprised to see I'm alone with this problem, ergo: unique and gotta fix my
machine.

GJH>   If you have a modern version of IE installed then you've already got
GJH>   the updates, otherwise you can get them from the MS site.
  
GJH>   Apologies if this not relevant / already tried, etc.

Idea is appreciated. Must have messed up something, even though all other
program prompts seem to work ok. Bummer!!



-- 
Cheers, and thanks.
 Julius



Current Ver: 1.60m
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com

Re[2]: New version of The Bat won't load!

[Handsome Jack Morrison]

Friday, August 5, 2005, 5:51:20 PM, you wrote:

[]
HJM>> No, he didn't explain how to backup the registry key, so it was a
HJM>> good opportunity for you to do so, or so I would have thought.

> Close TB.

> Windows: Start / Run / Regedit.

> The registry editor will open.

> Find the key HK_Current_User / Software / RIT and highlight it.

> Go File / Export and export the key to a convenient location.

> For restoring the key after you have followed Alexander's >
>instructions, close TB and double-click on that .reg file. Windows >
>will import it automatically. Open TB and see your settings restored.
[]

I've uninstalled the old Bat and reinstalled a new copy.  I've managed
to set up one of my 10 accounts, which I am using to make this post.

Can I do that now(close TB and double-click on that file), or should I
wait until after I have set-up all my other accounts?

-- 
Best regards,
Jack




Current version is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: New version of The Bat won't load!

[Handsome Jack Morrison]

Sunday, August 7, 2005, 1:26:06 PM, you wrote:

> Hello Handsome,

> On Sat, 6 Aug 2005 12:31:24 -0400 GMT (06/08/2005, 23:31 +0700 GMT),
> Handsome Jack Morrison wrote:

HJM>> Can I do that now(close TB and double-click on that file), or should I
HJM>> wait until after I have set-up all my other accounts?

> You should have done that before setting up accounts, because it would
> have saved you work. Now that you have set them up already, I wouldn't
> reimport the old registry key any more, because you will lose the info
> you have already typed in. The registry key will be overwritten.

Well, that's just great.  I have no idea what that means.

> Since TB is running on your machine now, just go ahead and continue
> setting up accounts. That's my advice.

Or what that means, either.

Why me, God?

"Because it had to be someone."

"So why not you?"

-- 
Best regards,
Jack




Current version is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: New version of The Bat won't load!

[Handsome Jack Morrison]

Sunday, August 7, 2005, 2:36:58 PM, you wrote:

> Hello Handsome,

> On Sun, 7 Aug 2005 14:15:00 -0400 GMT (08/08/2005, 01:15 +0700 GMT),
> Handsome Jack Morrison wrote:

>>> Since TB is running on your machine now, just go ahead and continue
>>> setting up accounts. That's my advice.

HJM>> Or what that means, either.

> It means, just go ahead with what you are doing anyway. Forget about
> the registry key (that .reg file) you have. You don't need it any more
> and would cause damage if you double-clicked on it now.

But I've *already* clicked on it, as requested.

That's how I managed to get rid of that freakin' nag screen, the same
one that the folks at Ritlabs are so proud of, and which was making my
already miserable life even more miserable while I was trying to set-up my
accounts, etc. all over again.

Now I don't have a clue what to do next.

-- 
Best regards,
Jack




Current version is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: New version of The Bat won't load!

[Handsome Jack Morrison]

Sunday, August 7, 2005, 5:30:54 PM, you wrote:

> Hallo Jack,

> On Sun, 7 Aug 2005 15:13:36 -0400GMT (7-8-2005, 21:13 +0200, where I
> live), you wrote:

>>> It means, just go ahead with what you are doing anyway. Forget about
>>> the registry key (that .reg file) you have. You don't need it any more
>>> and would cause damage if you double-clicked on it now.

JM>> But I've *already* clicked on it, as requested.

> Thomas meant the full registry back-up for TB. Not the single key file
> with your registration key that I extracted from it.

Okay.  Thanks for the clarification.

-- 
Best regards,
Jack




Current version is 3.51.10 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: New version released during my 30-day trial: to upgrade or not?

[Mike email (The Bat!)]

Hi

Tuesday, July 27, 2004, 1:27:32 AM, Marck D Pearlstone wrote:

MDP> Dear Mike,

MDP> @27-Jul-2004, 01:22 Mike email (The Bat!) said to The:

[...]

MDP> The current improvements are focused on IMAP operation, with each
MDP> new release seeing numerous bug fixes. If that interests you then an
MDP> upgrade is a must.

All my accounts so far are POP3 so it doesn't at the moment.

MDP> As for reverting, it's usually pretty a simple job.

Usually?

>>   Would my trial restart or continue?

MDP> It would continue.

To be expected if new releases come often.

-- 
Best regards,
 
MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Using The Bat! v2.11.02 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1



Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: New Version 3.62.05 : one bug solved, one bug staying, one bug appears

[WilWilWil]

W>> 3- I don't understand why all new mails begin with the character
W>> "@" just before the cursor in the new blank editor. :-(

RO> Could you post us your template?


Thanks, here it is (seems that the "@" replace the "%cursor") :

%CURSOR
-- 
WilWilWil 
:flag-france:

TB %THEBATVERSION
%BAYESITVERSION
%WINDOWSPLATFORMNAME
%WINDOWSCSDVERSION
%SetHeader("X-Rogue",":wilwilwil:")%
%Language="FR"
%ACCOUNT="WilWilWil"





-- 
WilWilWil 
:flag-france:


TB 3.62.05
BayesIt! 0.8.4
Windows XP
Service Pack 2


Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: New Version 3.62.05 : one bug solved, one bug staying, one bug appears

[WilWilWil]

>> %SetHeader("X-Rogue",":wilwilwil:")%
LLM> --^

LLM> Isn't there a « - » missing there? I would have written :

LLM> %SetHeader("X-Rogue",":wilwilwil:")%-


Even if I delete the Rogue line in the template, the "@" appears in the editor 
when I create a new mail...

-- 
WilWilWil 
:flag-france:


TB 3.62.05
BayesIt! 0.8.4
Windows XP
Service Pack 2


Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: New Version 3.62.05 : one bug solved, one bug staying, one bug appears

[WilWilWil]

 %SetHeader("X-Rogue",":wilwilwil:")%
>> LLM> --^

>> LLM> Isn't there a « - » missing there? I would have written :

>> LLM> %SetHeader("X-Rogue",":wilwilwil:")%-

>> Even if I delete the Rogue line in the template
LLM> This is not what asked...

Sorry, I didn't understood. I don't understand anymore... ;-) What are you 
talking about ?

@
-- 
WilWilWil 
:flag-france:


TB 3.62.05
BayesIt! 0.8.4
Windows XP
Service Pack 2


Current version is 3.62.08 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: New Version 3.62.05 : one bug solved, one bug staying, one bug appears

[WilWilWil]

>> I've found the origin of the problem : the %CURSOR in the template
>> becomes @ in the editor !

ASK> From the wrapping of your message I assume you are using the Windows
ASK> editor?

ASK> But anyway... I just set my editor prefs to the Windows Editor (I normally
ASK> use MicroEd), and I don't have any @ where the %CURSOR macro is.

ASK> Are you absolutely sure that you haven't defined another reply template,
ASK> for example if you have an addressbook entry in TB, or a folder template,
ASK> or... ?
Sure ! I 've made a test and insert the string "TEST" in the template I use to 
be sure. I can see TEST and @

I've made an other test : I 've deleted the template, and directly type %CURSOR 
in properties of the account at \template\new message... Same thong occurs : a 
@ instead of the Cursor !

@
-- 
WilWilWil 
:flag-france:


TB 3.62.05
BayesIt! 0.8.4
Windows XP
Service Pack 2


Current version is 3.62.08 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: New Version 3.62.05 : one bug solved, one bug staying, one bug appears

[WilWilWil]

ASK> Is it this: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5256 maybe?

Exactly what I have ! If I switch to Micro Ed for new mail instead of 
HTML/PlainText, the problem doesn't occur !

It seems to be fixed in 3.62.07... I just had a look at Ritlabs Web Site, but 
the version available is always the version of 28 oct. that I downloaded it 2 
days ago and it was the 3.62.05. How can I reach the 3.62.07 that bugtrack say 
this problem is solved in it ? I hope it is not a beta...

-- 
WilWilWil 
:flag-france:


TB 3.62.05
BayesIt! 0.8.4
Windows XP
Service Pack 2


Current version is 3.62.08 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: New Version 3.62.05 : one bug solved, one bug staying, one bug appears

[WilWilWil]

ASK> No its not. They silently replaced the MSI with a more recent version.

Silent release... Not nice method for user that want to follow the releases 
because have bugs to solved... ;-)

I try it and come back in few minutes...

Thanks for advice.
-- 
WilWilWil 
:flag-france:


TB 3.62.05
BayesIt! 0.8.4
Windows XP
Service Pack 2


Current version is 3.62.08 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re[2]: New Version 3.62.05 : one bug solved, one bug staying, one bug appears

[WilWilWil]

MM> it is fixed in 3.62.09, wait for it.

Who knows when a silent release is available at 
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/products/thebat/download.php 

How can I know that systematically ? TBBETA ?

-- 
WilWilWil 
:flag-france:


TB 3.62.08
BayesIt! 0.8.4
Windows XP
Service Pack 2


Current version is 3.62.08 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html