Re: Filter incoming mail from text file

2002-02-26 Thread Alastair Scott

On 26/02/02 at 16:45 Stuart Hemming wrote:

AS Now, if _domains_ as well as individual addresses could be added (eg
AS '*.com.tw'), we'd have a winner

Can't you just use a regexp to do that? Something like .*\.com\.tw
should do it (I think).

Indeed, but if there's a lot of them setting up TB!'s sorting office
becomes very unwieldy :/

Alastair






This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan
service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working
around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Message base index - error

2002-02-27 Thread Alastair Scott

On 27 February 2002 at 13:05 William wrote:

   I've just tried to close TB! I received the following message:
   'Could not create a new index of message base'

   I then clicked OK and TB! closed. on re-opening, no messages appear to
   have been lost and everything else seems to be fine. All
   accounts/folders are set to compress on exit and there are about 2.5k
   messages in total.

Strangely, that happened for the first time ever yesterday to me with
1.54 beta 44 and the same settings (compress on exit, but 18,000
messages here). As you say, no harm was done, so I closed my eyes ;)

Alastair

-- 
Alastair Scott (London, United Kingdom)
Using Windows XP and The Bat! 1.54 Beta/44


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: problems with html email, etc.

2002-03-03 Thread Alastair Scott

On 03 March 2002 at 19:42 Shoebuddy wrote:

 Sunday, March 03, 2002 at 2:41 PM

  Hello Everyone,
   Here is a nice article regarding problems with html mail
   and other things that might be of interest to people
   here
   http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/mar2002/tc2002031_3760.htm

I like the paragraph which complains about memory-hogging HTML code
then says that demand for 'software that manages email like Microsoft
Outlook' will grow :)

(In my experience people who use Outlook and send HTML email, because
it's the default and they haven't been informed of the difference
between HTML and text email and why it matters, are much of the
problem).

Alastair


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Scot Finnie's Newsletter

2002-03-03 Thread Alastair Scott

On 02 March 2002 at 22:23 William wrote:

 Hello TBUDL

   In Scot's current newsletter (on-line version at
   http://www.scotfinnie.com/newsletter/22.htm
   he compares TB! unfavourably with Eudora! He welcomes contrary views.
   Would any of our resident experts like to put him right?

Well ...

Outbound filtering has been there since the Ark (and two copies of TB!
emerging from it ;)

He takes about 10 times as much space to describe what he needs
(several times) as is necessary, but what I _think_ the TB! analogue
is is:

N accounts, A,B,C,D ... Z.

All inbound email to A,B,C,D ... Y is redirected to Z by a filter
with:

Kludges = @

Destination = \\Z\Inbox

in each of A,B,C,D ...

That's the easy bit; the response is trickier. What he appears to want
to do is to put the To: address of the filtered mail from A,B,C,D ...
into the From: and Reply-To: fields of the response from Z (ignore all
the waffle about 'personalities').

Now we get into the old, insoluble argument about 'is rewriting the
header of an incoming or outgoing email legal, decent, honest and
truthful?' and the real issue is that TB! says 'no' and Eudora says
'yes' :)

I try not to 'blame the user', but some people seem to open a new
email account every week. Some discipline is needed; I'm pretty
assiduous about closing old accounts (which, unfortunately, took place
three times last year because of UK ISP closures and mergers) and
telling people I'm moving. Those who are interested will make the
change and those who aren't won't; after all, do you have postal mail
indefinitely redirected from all the properties you previously lived
in?

Alastair


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Signatures on mailing lists (was: TB won't open a message)

2002-03-03 Thread Alastair Scott

On 02 March 2002 at 15:47 Miguel wrote:

 My point, in case I didn't make it clear, is that everything in a
 message adds up to it's final footprint and not just secure
 signatures. And that all redundant and/or unnecessary information
 is, from my point of view, a waste. That is why I used the Me too
 as an example of how a very short message may end up with an
 un-proportional footprint, specially if you multiply it by the number
 of subscribers to this list.

I'm afraid things are going the opposite way - try, for example,

i. Yahoo! Groups mailing lists (adverts added by servers);

ii. emails from corporate mail addresses ('this mail is virus-free'
and/or legal disclaimers added by servers).

Neither of these additions existed a few years ago and in some ways,
this list adds very little; often either of i. or ii. are 20 lines
long and are enforced (the user can't turn them off) :(

Alastair


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: UninstallingTB!

2002-03-04 Thread Alastair Scott

On 04 March 2002 at 17:55 Carren wrote:

 He says he will take another look at it but made some comment about
 install/uninstall again and said you shouldn't have to manually edit
 the registry to uninstall a program. OK ... so as far as I am aware
 TB! is easily uninstalled via add/remove programs so what is he
 talking about? As I have never uninstalled TB! from my system (of
 course not!) I can't speak from experience. Is he referring to maybe
 registry entries that are left behind after uninstalling or is he just
 slightly confused? :-)

He could mean registry entries left behind; TB! does this ... and so
do, it seems, about 90 per cent of programs in existence. (And some,
like Office, leave a lot more than registry entries behind =)

Alastair


-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: Agenda companion to The Bat!

2002-03-11 Thread Alastair Scott

On Mon, 11 Mar 2002 17:53:09 +0100, Luc wrote:

try Time  Chaos: http://www.isbister.com/

Interesting that they're offering Express Plus, an email package which 
purports to tie closely with T  C and has some nice features:

http://www.isbister.com/express-plus-is-cool.asp

Evidently there's a need for an email + agenda combination. (I can 
understand it - I always get complaints about 'why didn't you respond 
to that meeting request', with the answer 'as I don't use Outlook the 
voting buttons don't show' :)

I use AMF Daily Planner  Personal Information Manager:

http://www.amfsoftware.com/windows/amfpim.html

Although there's no explicit tie-in with TB! it's a nice package.

Alastair
-- 
Alastair Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
London, United Kingdom



-- 

Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 




Re: AntispamSniper in Commercial and FREE version

2006-07-10 Thread Alastair Scott
On 10/07/2006 at 18:10 Henk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Mon, 10 Jul 2006 12:05:30 +0200GMT (10-7-2006, 12:05 +0200, where I
 live), Marek Mikus wrote:

 developer of AntispamSniper released FREE version of its plugin, this
 version misses some advanced features (DNSBL, deleting spam on server,
 Anti-phishing etc.), but it is fully functional and with no trial.

 Download:
 http://antispamsniper.com/thebat_plugin.html

 Upgrade info:
 http://antispamsniper.com/upgrade.html

 Can this be used next to Bayes Filter Plugin or?

There is no technical reason why not. However, the author doesn't recommend it. 
Quote:

It is recommended to remove any other installed anti-spam plug-ins from The 
Bat!. If you have several plug-ins installed, then the overall rating for 
messages is evaluated according to special parameter in The Bat! settings. It 
is Average by default and this means that the rating will be evaluated as 
average between the rating obtained from each plug-in. Maximum and Minimum 
mean that the maximum or minimum rating from all values will be taken as 
overall rating. Plug-ins are not learning from each other and that is why there 
is no sense in installing several plug-ins simultaneously. The classification 
quality will be approximately equal to the quality of the plug-in with the 
worst characteristics. Moreover, the less learned plug-in will be unable to 
learn normally. The more learned plug-in will correctly classify the messages 
unknown to less learned plug-in and therefore it will never learn such 
messages.

I would have to lie down for a few hours in a darkened room to fully digest 
that reasoning, but it seems plausible ;)

Alastair
-- 
Alastair Scott (London, United Kingdom)
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

pgp08Dbv2HReZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Folder views don't stick

2006-07-10 Thread Alastair Scott
Having come back to TB! after about 4 years away I don't have history on 
this, so cannot tell whether it is specific to 3.80.06. But ...

I am having trouble getting views to stick on folders. To start with I set a 
view called Default View then applied it to all folders. Some time later I 
decided to set a second view called Default View (Outgoing) and apply it to 
Outbox and Sent Mail folders for each account.

No matter what I do (right mouse button on folder, then Folder View Mode; 
Alt-Enter; Options, then Preferences, then View Mode, then Use By ... and apply 
to each folder) the ... (Outgoing) view doesn't stick in the view pane; the 
columns in Default View (renamed Default View (Incoming)) remain visible 
even though Folder View Mode has the ... (Outgoing) option ticked).

Help!

Alastair
-- 
Alastair Scott (London, United Kingdom)
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

pgpKmoWKl6Otl.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Folder views don't stick

2006-07-11 Thread Alastair Scott
On 11/07/2006 at 02:06 Stuart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hello Alastair,
 Monday, July 10, 2006, 2:17:17 PM, you wrote:

 Having come back to TB! after about 4 years away I don't have
 history on this, so cannot tell whether it is specific to 3.80.06. But ...

 I am having trouble getting views to stick on folders. To start
 with I set a view called Default View then applied it to all
 folders. Some time later I decided to set a second view called
 Default View (Outgoing) and apply it to Outbox and Sent Mail folders for 
 each account.

 No matter what I do (right mouse button on folder, then Folder View
 Mode; Alt-Enter; Options, then Preferences, then View Mode, then Use
 By ... and apply to each folder) the ... (Outgoing) view doesn't
 stick in the view pane; the columns in Default View (renamed
 Default View (Incoming)) remain visible even though Folder View
 Mode has the ... (Outgoing) option ticked).

 Make sure to set View/Global View Mode to None.

Fixed. Thanks!

Alastair
-- 
Alastair Scott (London, United Kingdom)
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

pgpSwb6SM844A.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: AntispamSniper in Commercial and FREE version

2006-07-28 Thread Alastair Scott
On 28/07/2006 at 16:33 Henk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 I have installed this program/plugin 3 weeks ago and I must say that I
 am impressed the way it works/behaves. I will keep on using it.

Agreed - finally, in Windows, something as good as the astonishing SpamSieve on 
OS X http://c-command.com/spamsieve/ which I previously thought was 
unbeatable!

In fact, it is so impressive I will be buying the paying version although I 
don't need it (the comments above concern the free version ...).

Alastair
-- 
Alastair Scott (London, United Kingdom)

pgpEdf9MSlQME.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Current version is 3.80.06 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

<    1   2