[tcpdump-workers] Re: [tcpdump] About struct in_addr / struct in6_addr
On Feb 18, 2023, at 10:27 AM, Denis Ovsienko wrote: > OS IPv6 support would be a very reasonable requirement for tcpdump 5. Which would, among other things, let us remove the tests for various add-on IPv6 stacks in configure.ac. ___ tcpdump-workers mailing list -- tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org To unsubscribe send an email to tcpdump-workers-le...@lists.tcpdump.org %(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s
[tcpdump-workers] Re: [tcpdump] About struct in_addr / struct in6_addr
On Sun, 17 Jul 2022 16:11:01 -0700 Guy Harris via tcpdump-workers wrote: > On Jul 17, 2022, at 3:39 PM, Bill Fenner wrote: > > > IMO it is safe to drop support for OSes lacking native IPv6 > > support. > > Yeah. Back when IPv6 support was added to tcpdump, it was an > experimental new technology and the configure script had to figure > out which of several add-on IPv6 packages you had installed. Now a > significant amount of Wikipedia vandalism comes from IPv6 addresses > rather than IPv4 addresses. :-) OS IPv6 support would be a very reasonable requirement for tcpdump 5. -- Denis Ovsienko ___ tcpdump-workers mailing list -- tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org To unsubscribe send an email to tcpdump-workers-le...@lists.tcpdump.org %(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s
[tcpdump-workers] TCP Header Flags
Hello, https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9293 states: "Control bits: The control bits are also known as "flags". Assignment is managed by IANA from the "TCP Header Flags" registry [62]. The currently assigned control bits are CWR, ECE, URG, ACK, PSH, RST, SYN, and FIN." (All on three characters.) To be in sync with it, we could use 'tcp-psh' in addition to 'tcp-push' in libpcap scanner.l, and in pcap-filter.7 and tcpdump.1 man pages. ___ tcpdump-workers mailing list -- tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org To unsubscribe send an email to tcpdump-workers-le...@lists.tcpdump.org %(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s
