Re: [tcpdump-workers] support of sctp in filters
Thank you very much Guy for your support, I will try to test the current state of affairs today if time permits. On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 00:36:02 -0800, Guy Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If somebody wants to contribute that, something that avoids using newlines - unless -vv is specified, the output of tcpdump should be limited to one line per packet - would be useful, e.g. something just listing the chunk types and other parameters, without dumping the chunk data. I've checked in a change to do that. - This is the tcpdump-workers list. Visit https://lists.sandelman.ca/ to unsubscribe. - This is the tcpdump-workers list. Visit https://lists.sandelman.ca/ to unsubscribe.
[tcpdump-workers] support of sctp in filters
Hello dear mailing list partcipants, are there any plans to support sctp for capture filters? With Best Regards Ariel Burbaickij - This is the tcpdump-workers list. Visit https://lists.sandelman.ca/ to unsubscribe.
Re: [tcpdump-workers] support of sctp in filters
The second one, I guess the fact that there is protocol descriminator can be found in IP header is somehow almost common knowledge, isn't it. Accordingly, one can do what you have suggested. On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 07:46:34 -0800, Bruce M Simpson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 04:30:36PM +0100, Ariel Burbaickij wrote: Hello dear mailing list partcipants, are there any plans to support sctp for capture filters? tcpdump -X -i iface ip proto sctp Of course, if you mean dumping sctp traffic in a human-readable manner, that is quite different. BMS - This is the tcpdump-workers list. Visit https://lists.sandelman.ca/ to unsubscribe. - This is the tcpdump-workers list. Visit https://lists.sandelman.ca/ to unsubscribe.
