SI'SPOSAEXPO 2010 Gara di torte per una grande festa

2010-11-15 Thread UFFICIO STAMPA
[IMAGE]



SMSPOSAEXPO 2010
AL CROWNE PLAZA DI CASERTA
18-21 NOVEMBRE
GARA DI TORTE PER UNA GRANDE FESTA

[IMAGE]Caserta, 13 novembre 2010 – Sl Sposa Expo 2010 h anche
partecipazione e divertimento. Nella dolcezza piy assoluta. Quest’anno
alla Fiera nazionale di prodotti e servizi per il matrimonio c’h anche la
gara delle torte. L’evento, che si tiene al Complesso Turistico Crowne
Plaza di Caserta (18-21 novembre), giunto alla sua seconda edizione
dedica un segmento della quattro giorni, il pomeriggio del 18 novembre,
alle competizioni di wedding cake toppers e torte nuziali.
Agli organizzatori non poteva mancare un pensiero per il gusto, hanno
quindi pensato di mettere in competizione la regina dolce delle cerimonie
nuziali. La protagonista del momento piy bello del ricevimento, quando
gli sposi brindano con amici e parenti e il giorno unico della propria
vita si trasforma in una grande festa.

Per i visitatori le piy belle e buone torte di matrimonio, dove il
marzapane, la pasta al cioccolato, la pasta di mandorle e la panna la
fanno da padrone. Quella romantica, completamente bianca; la nuziale con
coralli e conchiglie, quella classica a piy piani e la bianca con fiori
di zucchero blu; la torta al cioccolato bianco e nero, la torta bianco e
rosa e chi piy ne ha piy ne metta. Saranno tra le protagoniste della gara
cui prenderanno parte solo i partecipanti alla Fiera con un proprio stand
oppure tramite loro clienti arrivati a Sl Sposa Expo e ai quali sono
fornite torte nuziali.
Ammesse alla competizione solamente le torte artigianali preparate nei
rispettivi laboratori e rifinite nell’elaborazione finale presso il
Crowne Plaza. La torta sar` consegnata a un ispettore all’interno di un
involucro che la sottragga alla vista e che non abbia alcun riferimento
riconducibile al laboratorio che l’ha prodotta . Una giuria, nominata
dagli organizzatori, determiner` le classifiche finali. Le torte saranno
valutate secondo: originalit`, aspetto estetico, profumo, aroma, gusto.[IMAGE]
Al vincitore spetter` una coppa piy un premio di 500 euro. Sar` anche
estratto a sorte, tra le partecipanti alla giuria popolare, un premio
offerto da Sl Sposa Expo, consistente in una torta nuziale da 12
chilogrammi acquistata presso il laboratorio che si aggiudicher` la gara.
Espositori e visitatori tutti protagonisti a quella che si preannuncia
come una delle rassegne sul matrimonio piy importanti del Mezzogiorno. Un
appuntamento di tendenza alla riscoperta di emozioni, colori, profumi e
sapori. Presente il meglio di abiti da cerimonia, abiti da sposa, abiti
da sposo, accessori, agenzie di servizi, arredamento, beauty,
hair-stylist, bomboniere e confetti, catering, flower designer,
fotografia-video, gioielli, intimo, lista nozze, location, musica, auto
moderne e d’epoca, carrozze, partecipazioni, ristoranti e alberghi,
servizi finanziari, viaggi.
La Fiera del matrimonio di Caserta h ricca di sfilate moda-sposi, il
super per la sposa in passerella. La sposa del 2010-2011 potr` scegliere
tra i tanti modelli che i migliori stilisti hanno creato. Ci sono maestri
d’arte per acconciature realizzate con fiori, coroncine, calotte,
lunette, composizioni che possono essere un’alternativa al velo piy
classico. Per le coppie tanti modi per festeggiare il proprio matrimonio:
pranzo, cena o cocktail tradizionalmente fatti in ristorante o in una
location con i suggerimenti di wedding planner esperti.
Il percorso emozionale, stimolante, in grado di alimentare i sogni e di
esaudire i desideri, di Sl Sposa Expo 2010 vi offre anche il dolce. Non
mancate!

Ufficio Stampa SlSposaExpo
Tel +39 0823.1700340 – fax +39 0823.1761335
Casella e-mail: i...@sisposaexpo.it

Il presente Comunicato h disponibile anche sul sito www.sisposaexpo.it

Se ritenete, inviate avviso di avvenuta pubblicazione presso
i...@sisposaexpo.it

Ai sensi del D.Lgs 196/2003 informiamo che il Suo indirizzo e-mail h
stato reperito attraverso fonti di pubblico dominio o attraverso e-mail o
adesioni da noi ricevute. Tutti i destinatari della mail sono in copia
nascosta (D.Lgs196/2003). Qualora il messaggio pervenga anche a persona
non interessata, preghiamo volercelo cortesemente segnalare rispondendo
CANCELLAMI all'indirizzo i...@sisposaexpo.it precisando l'indirizzo che
si desidera sia immediatamente rimosso dalla mailing list. Tendiamo ad
evitare fastidiosi MULTIPLI INVII, ma laddove cir avvenisse preghiamo di
segnalarcelo e ce ne scusiamo sin d'ora. Grazie.

leggi tutti i comunicati



vai al sito del sisposaexpo



Cigarrillo Electrónico - Para fumar en cualquier lugar

2010-11-15 Thread WINGED
CigarrilloElectronico 88mm con display LCD $ 270 pesos
Dispositivo electroacute;niocreado para mejorar la
calidad de Vida. Con apariencia de un cigarillo tradicional pero con la
ventajade no contar con tabaco ni alquitraacute;n. 
Sabor a cigarrillo y vapor simulador del humo. Puede ser usado en cualquier
lugar ya que no tiene olor ni dantilde;ala saludo.



Ofertas imperdibles de Noviembre en PcDiscount!

2010-11-15 Thread Rodrigo Ferreri
PcDiscount - Noviembre

(*)Bases y Condiciones.

Oferta valida unicamente para nuestros clientes compradores de equipos   
Notebooks y Desktop durante el periodo del 01/11 al 01/12.

Servicio brindado en forma gratuita hasta el 31 de Diciembre del 2010 con   una 
duracion de 20 minutos por cada sesion de asistencia remota en los   dias y 
horarios convenidos de lunes a vienes de 10Hs a 18Hs.

img src=file:///C|/Documents and 
Settings/user/Escritorio/distribuidores/TECHTURN.COM_files/open.htm width=1 
height=1



Re: Simple if_iwi.c diff to fix scan lock issue

2010-11-15 Thread Alexander Hall
On 11/15/10 08:12, Jeremy Chase wrote:
 If an iwi device is interrupted while scanning for an AP the scan lock
 is not removed. Drivers for if_iwn.c and if_wpi.c have accounted for
 this in the same manner. I believe if_ipw.c suffers from the same
 problem, but I don't have a machine to verify it.
 
 This diff is for 4.8-stable, but the issue is still in -current. I am
 running it now, and things seem much more pleasant.
 
 Thanks!
 
 Index: if_iwi.c
 ===
 RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/pci/if_iwi.c,v
 retrieving revision 1.105
 diff -r1.105 if_iwi.c
 2350a2351,2353
   /* In case we were scanning, release the scan lock. */
   ic-ic_scan_lock = IEEE80211_SCAN_UNLOCKED;
 

Even if I handled wifi diffs that diff would not tell me much. Please
run cvs diff with -uNp.

Suggestion:

$ echo 'diff -uNp'  ~/.cvsrc

/Alexander



Re: next step in *DEPENDS simplification

2010-11-15 Thread Alexander Hall
On 11/15/10 19:31, Marc Espie wrote:
 So now we have
 *DEPENDS = pkgspec:pkgpath
 in an uniform way, with pkgspec: completely omitted when it's the
 default stem-*
 
 The idea is to remove as much noise as possible and it's already working
 great
 
 Compare:
 
 -RUN_DEPENDS=   :desktop-file-utils-*:devel/desktop-file-utils \
 -   :shared-mime-info-=0.21:misc/shared-mime-info
 
 +RUN_DEPENDS=   devel/desktop-file-utils \
 +   shared-mime-info-=0.21:misc/shared-mime-info
 
 
 but it might still be a bit too complex, especially since the most frequent
 spec is this stem past that version, so STEM-
 +RUN_DEPENDS=   devel/desktop-file-utils \
 +   STEM-=0.21:misc/shared-mime-info
 
 still a bit of line noise.  Dropping STEM- altogether looks unnatural
 +RUN_DEPENDS=   devel/desktop-file-utils \
 +   =0.21:misc/shared-mime-info
 
 let's tack the number at the end instead:
 +RUN_DEPENDS=   devel/desktop-file-utils \
 +   misc/shared-mime-info=0.21

So you drop the dash after the stem path here? While I do find that
notation at least as readable, if not more so, it could possibly cause
confusion vs the shared-mime-info-=0.21:... notation.

Just my two cents as a non-porter.

/Alexander

 
 looks intuitive, and we're left with only a few (very few ports) with
 explicit pkgspecs.
 
 
 The problem with this is that those depends are no longer easily parsable
 and contain something that's not a real path.
 
 So let's ask make to rewrite things before the shell sees anything.
 Yeah, the syntax is totally barbaric, but it says if you see a depends
 that's ONLY a path (no : and a / should be present) followed by =, then
 cut it at the first =, and rewrite it backwards with STEM at front.
 
 Try this with make describe in say, misc/screen, and see groff coming out as:
 
 screen-4.0.3p2|misc/screen||multi-screen window 
 manager|misc/screen/pkg/DESCR|The OpenBSD ports mailing-list 
 po...@openbsd.org|misc||STEM-=1.15.47p2:textproc/groff||any|y|y|y|y
 
 as should be.
 
 Unless someone has better ideas/comments, I think we're going to go that
 route.
 
 
 Index: bsd.port.mk
 ===
 RCS file: /cvs/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk,v
 retrieving revision 1.1058
 diff -u -p -r1.1058 bsd.port.mk
 --- bsd.port.mk   14 Nov 2010 11:17:36 -  1.1058
 +++ bsd.port.mk   15 Nov 2010 18:24:22 -
 @@ -563,7 +563,7 @@ ERRORS += Fatal: no flavors for this po
  
  USE_GROFF ?= No
  .if ${USE_GROFF:L} == yes
 -BUILD_DEPENDS += groff-=1.15.4.7p2:textproc/groff
 +BUILD_DEPENDS += textproc/groff=1.15.47p2
  _PKG_ARGS += -DUSE_GROFF=1
  .endif
  
 @@ -1425,12 +1425,12 @@ _CHECK_DEPENDS =
  # normalization of depends to remove extra :
  .for _v in BUILD LIB RUN REGRESS
  _CHECK_DEPENDS +:= ${${_v}_DEPENDS}
 -${_v}_DEPENDS := ${${_v}_DEPENDS:S/^://:S/^://}
 +${_v}_DEPENDS := 
 ${${_v}_DEPENDS:S/^://:S/^://:C,^([^:]+/[^:=]+)([=][^:]+)$,STEM-\2:\1,}
  .endfor
  .for _s in ${MULTI_PACKAGES}
  .  for _v in RUN LIB
  _CHECK_DEPENDS +:= ${${_v}_DEPENDS${_s}}
 -${_v}_DEPENDS${_s} := ${${_v}_DEPENDS${_s}:S/^://:S/^://}
 +${_v}_DEPENDS${_s} := 
 ${${_v}_DEPENDS${_s}:S/^://:S/^://:C,^([^:]+/[^:=]+)([=][^:]+)$,STEM-\2:\1,}
  .  endfor
  .endfor



Re: next step in *DEPENDS simplification

2010-11-15 Thread Marc Espie
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:29:08AM +0100, Alexander Hall wrote:
 On 11/15/10 19:31, Marc Espie wrote:
  So now we have
  *DEPENDS = pkgspec:pkgpath
  in an uniform way, with pkgspec: completely omitted when it's the
  default stem-*
  
  The idea is to remove as much noise as possible and it's already working
  great
  
  Compare:
  
  -RUN_DEPENDS=   :desktop-file-utils-*:devel/desktop-file-utils \
  -   :shared-mime-info-=0.21:misc/shared-mime-info
  
  +RUN_DEPENDS=   devel/desktop-file-utils \
  +   shared-mime-info-=0.21:misc/shared-mime-info
  
  
  but it might still be a bit too complex, especially since the most frequent
  spec is this stem past that version, so STEM-
  +RUN_DEPENDS=   devel/desktop-file-utils \
  +   STEM-=0.21:misc/shared-mime-info
  
  still a bit of line noise.  Dropping STEM- altogether looks unnatural
  +RUN_DEPENDS=   devel/desktop-file-utils \
  +   =0.21:misc/shared-mime-info
  
  let's tack the number at the end instead:
  +RUN_DEPENDS=   devel/desktop-file-utils \
  +   misc/shared-mime-info=0.21
 
 So you drop the dash after the stem path here? While I do find that
 notation at least as readable, if not more so, it could possibly cause
 confusion vs the shared-mime-info-=0.21:... notation.
 
There is no stem in there. A pkgpath is something different.

For a pkgspec, the - does makes some sense, because we go from
screen-3.0.2 to screen-=3.0.2

but in misc/screen there's never been any -, so misc/screen=3.02 should be
okay.

That said, it's likely that more verifications for valid specs might save
some people some head-scratching...



Allow routing options in PF match rules

2010-11-15 Thread Vadim Zhukov
Second try. Fixes (thank you, Henning, for fast, actual comments):

  - Old and new pfsync should now co-operate smoothly, assuming you
do not use routing options on match rules until all firewalls
got updated. If you will not, you'll shoot yourself in the foot:
stats and traffic may get screwed, not checked if that may
cause panics. Again: pfsync was NOT tested in real environment.

  - More style(9) compliance. Not sure about struct pf_state change,
though: will it ever break on architectures with 4-byte pointers
but 64-bit alignment requirements, if there are any?.. Sorry for
possibly stupid question.

(Sorry if this'll start a new thread for you, I'm playing with
making smtpd and GMail friends).

Index: sys/net/if_pflog.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/net/if_pflog.c,v
retrieving revision 1.32
diff -u -p -r1.32 if_pflog.c
--- sys/net/if_pflog.c  21 Sep 2010 22:49:14 -  1.32
+++ sys/net/if_pflog.c  16 Nov 2010 01:33:03 -
@@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ pflogioctl(struct ifnet *ifp, u_long cmd
 int
 pflog_packet(struct pfi_kif *kif, struct mbuf *m, sa_family_t af, u_int8_t dir,
 u_int8_t reason, struct pf_rule *rm, struct pf_rule *am,
-struct pf_ruleset *ruleset, struct pf_pdesc *pd)
+struct pf_rule *rtr, struct pf_ruleset *ruleset, struct pf_pdesc *pd)
 {
 #if NBPFILTER  0
struct ifnet *ifn;
@@ -241,6 +241,10 @@ pflog_packet(struct pfi_kif *kif, struct
strlcpy(hdr.ruleset, ruleset-anchor-name,
sizeof(hdr.ruleset));
}
+   if (rtr == NULL)
+   hdr.rt_rulenr = htonl(-1);
+   else
+   hdr.rt_rulenr = htonl(rtr-nr);
if (rm-log  PF_LOG_SOCKET_LOOKUP  !pd-lookup.done)
pd-lookup.done = pf_socket_lookup(dir, pd);
if (pd-lookup.done  0) {
Index: sys/net/if_pflog.h
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/net/if_pflog.h,v
retrieving revision 1.17
diff -u -p -r1.17 if_pflog.h
--- sys/net/if_pflog.h  21 Sep 2010 11:05:10 -  1.17
+++ sys/net/if_pflog.h  16 Nov 2010 01:33:03 -
@@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ struct pfloghdr {
struct pf_addr  daddr;
u_int16_t   sport;
u_int16_t   dport;
+   u_int32_t   rt_rulenr;
 };
 
 #define PFLOG_HDRLEN   sizeof(struct pfloghdr)
@@ -70,9 +71,9 @@ struct pfloghdr {
 void   pflog_bpfcopy(const void *, void *, size_t);
 
 #if NPFLOG  0
-#definePFLOG_PACKET(i,x,a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h) 
pflog_packet(i,a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h)
+#definePFLOG_PACKET(i,x,a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,j) 
pflog_packet(i,a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,j)
 #else
-#definePFLOG_PACKET(i,x,a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h) ((void)0)
+#definePFLOG_PACKET(i,x,a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,j) ((void)0)
 #endif /* NPFLOG  0 */
 #endif /* _KERNEL */
 #endif /* _NET_IF_PFLOG_H_ */
Index: sys/net/if_pfsync.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/net/if_pfsync.c,v
retrieving revision 1.156
diff -u -p -r1.156 if_pfsync.c
--- sys/net/if_pfsync.c 27 Sep 2010 23:45:48 -  1.156
+++ sys/net/if_pfsync.c 16 Nov 2010 01:33:03 -
@@ -466,6 +466,15 @@ pfsync_state_export(struct pfsync_state 
sp-anchor = htonl(st-anchor.ptr-nr);
sp-nat_rule = htonl(-1);   /* left for compat, nat_rule is gone */
 
+   /*
+* Make pfsync with and without support of routing rules co-exist: leave
+* 0 instead -1 and do the decrement dance in pfsync_state_import().
+*/
+   if (st-rt_rule == NULL)
+   sp-rt_rule = 0;
+   else
+   sp-rt_rule = htonl(st-rt_rule-nr + 1);
+
pf_state_counter_hton(st-packets[0], sp-packets[0]);
pf_state_counter_hton(st-packets[1], sp-packets[1]);
pf_state_counter_hton(st-bytes[0], sp-bytes[0]);
@@ -481,7 +490,7 @@ pfsync_state_import(struct pfsync_state 
 {
struct pf_state *st = NULL;
struct pf_state_key *skw = NULL, *sks = NULL;
-   struct pf_rule *r = NULL;
+   struct pf_rule *r = NULL, *rtr = NULL;
struct pfi_kif  *kif;
int pool_flags;
int error;
@@ -504,12 +513,18 @@ pfsync_state_import(struct pfsync_state 
 * If the ruleset checksums match or the state is coming from the ioctl,
 * it's safe to associate the state with the rule of that number.
 */
-   if (sp-rule != htonl(-1)  sp-anchor == htonl(-1) 
-   (flags  (PFSYNC_SI_IOCTL | PFSYNC_SI_CKSUM))  ntohl(sp-rule) 
-   pf_main_ruleset.rules.active.rcount)
-   r = pf_main_ruleset.rules.active.ptr_array[ntohl(sp-rule)];
-   else
-   r = pf_default_rule;
+   if ((flags  (PFSYNC_SI_IOCTL | PFSYNC_SI_CKSUM))) {
+   if (sp-rule != htonl(-1)  sp-anchor == htonl(-1) 
+   ntohl(sp-rule)  pf_main_ruleset.rules.active.rcount)
+   r = 

Compresores Múltiples Usos

2010-11-15 Thread TBX
$  590 pesos   Compresor   
de aire 2,5 HP 50 lts Compresorde alta
recuperacion / Ideal para usar con pistolasde
Pintar y herramientas neumaacute;ticas / Potencia  
 2,5HP / Presioacute;n 125 lbs / Tanque 50 lts / Caudal
   366 l/min  Equipode Pintar con 
Minicompresor  $290 Pesos Compresor 
  2 HP 24 lts  $420 Pesos Compresor 
  de aire 2,5 HP 100 lts  $ 
  985 Pesos Compresorde aire 3 HP 100 lts  $
   1748 Pesos