Re: little-but-scary ahc(4) diff, testers wanted
* Miod Vallat m...@online.fr [2012-02-09 18:15]: Could people with ahc(4) SCSI controllers give the following diff a try and report whether this causes any difference in behaviour? This diff seems to do wonders on alpha, but I'd like reports from other platforms (such as i386, amd64 and macppc) before considering putting it in. survived a backup run on amd64 MP OpenBSD 5.1 (GENERIC.MP) #0: Fri Feb 10 21:12:36 CET 2012 henn...@odumin.bsws.de:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP real mem = 4292280320 (4093MB) avail mem = 4163854336 (3970MB) mainbus0 at root bios0 at mainbus0: SMBIOS rev. 2.5 @ 0xcfedf000 (39 entries) bios0: vendor Phoenix Technologies LTD version 1.0c date 07/24/2008 bios0: Supermicro X7SB4/E acpi0 at bios0: rev 2 acpi0: sleep states S0 S1 S4 S5 acpi0: tables DSDT FACP DMAR MCFG HPET APIC BOOT SPCR ERST HEST BERT EINJ SLIC SSDT SSDT SSDT SSDT SSDT SSDT SSDT SSDT SSDT acpi0: wakeup devices PXHA(S5) PXHB(S5) PEX_(S5) LAN_(S5) USB4(S5) USB5(S5) USB7(S5) ESB2(S5) EXP1(S5) EXP5(S5) EXP6(S5) USB1(S5) USB2(S5) USB3(S5) USB6(S5) ESB1(S5) PCIB(S5) KBC0(S1) MSE0(S1) COM1(S5) COM2(S5) PWRB(S3) acpitimer0 at acpi0: 3579545 Hz, 24 bits acpimcfg0 at acpi0 addr 0xe000, bus 0-16 acpihpet0 at acpi0: 14318179 Hz acpimadt0 at acpi0 addr 0xfee0: PC-AT compat cpu0 at mainbus0: apid 0 (boot processor) cpu0: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E7500 @ 2.93GHz, 2926.34 MHz cpu0: FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,SSE3,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,EST,TM2,SSSE3,CX16,xTPR,PDCM,SSE4.1,XSAVE,NXE,LONG,LAHF cpu0: 3MB 64b/line 8-way L2 cache cpu0: apic clock running at 266MHz cpu1 at mainbus0: apid 1 (application processor) cpu1: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E7500 @ 2.93GHz, 2926.00 MHz cpu1: FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,SSE3,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,EST,TM2,SSSE3,CX16,xTPR,PDCM,SSE4.1,XSAVE,NXE,LONG,LAHF cpu1: 3MB 64b/line 8-way L2 cache ioapic0 at mainbus0: apid 2 pa 0xfec0, version 20, 24 pins ioapic1 at mainbus0: apid 3 pa 0xfecc, version 20, 24 pins ioapic2 at mainbus0: apid 4 pa 0xfecc0400, version 20, 24 pins acpiprt0 at acpi0: bus 0 (PCI0) acpiprt1 at acpi0: bus 2 (PXHA) acpiprt2 at acpi0: bus 3 (PXHB) acpiprt3 at acpi0: bus -1 (PEX_) acpiprt4 at acpi0: bus 5 (EXP1) acpiprt5 at acpi0: bus 13 (EXP5) acpiprt6 at acpi0: bus 15 (EXP6) acpiprt7 at acpi0: bus 17 (PCIB) acpicpu0 at acpi0: C1, PSS acpicpu1 at acpi0: C1, PSS acpibtn0 at acpi0: PWRB acpivideo0 at acpi0: IGD0 ipmi at mainbus0 not configured cpu0: Enhanced SpeedStep 2926 MHz: speeds: 2933, 2667, 2400, 2133, 1867, 1600 MHz pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0 pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 Intel 3200/3210 Host rev 0x01 ppb0 at pci0 dev 1 function 0 Intel 3200/3210 PCIE rev 0x01: msi pci1 at ppb0 bus 1 ppb1 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 Intel 6700PXH PCIE-PCIX rev 0x09 pci2 at ppb1 bus 2 Intel IOxAPIC rev 0x09 at pci1 dev 0 function 1 not configured ppb2 at pci1 dev 0 function 2 Intel 6700PXH PCIE-PCIX rev 0x09 pci3 at ppb2 bus 3 ahc0 at pci3 dev 1 function 0 Adaptec AHA-29160 U160 rev 0x02: apic 4 int 0 scsibus0 at ahc0: 16 targets, initiator 7 st0 at scsibus0 targ 4 lun 0: HP, Ultrium 2-SCSI, F6AW SCSI3 1/sequential removable naa.50060b2ba152 ch0 at scsibus0 targ 6 lun 0: OVERLAND, LXB, 0106 SCSI2 8/changer removable serial.OVERLANDLXB_2B43200111 ahc0: target 14 using 8bit transfers ahc0: target 14 using asynchronous transfers st1 at scsibus0 targ 14 lun 0: TANDBERG, TS400, 0330 SCSI3 1/sequential removable t10.TANDBERGTS400_400062000880 Intel IOxAPIC rev 0x09 at pci1 dev 0 function 3 not configured uhci0 at pci0 dev 26 function 0 Intel 82801I USB rev 0x02: apic 2 int 16 uhci1 at pci0 dev 26 function 1 Intel 82801I USB rev 0x02: apic 2 int 17 uhci2 at pci0 dev 26 function 2 Intel 82801I USB rev 0x02: apic 2 int 18 ehci0 at pci0 dev 26 function 7 Intel 82801I USB rev 0x02: apic 2 int 18 usb0 at ehci0: USB revision 2.0 uhub0 at usb0 Intel EHCI root hub rev 2.00/1.00 addr 1 ppb3 at pci0 dev 28 function 0 Intel 82801I PCIE rev 0x02: msi pci4 at ppb3 bus 5 ppb4 at pci0 dev 28 function 4 Intel 82801I PCIE rev 0x02: msi pci5 at ppb4 bus 13 em0 at pci5 dev 0 function 0 Intel PRO/1000MT (82573E) rev 0x03: msi, address 00:30:48:d1:31:42 ppb5 at pci0 dev 28 function 5 Intel 82801I PCIE rev 0x02: msi pci6 at ppb5 bus 15 em1 at pci6 dev 0 function 0 Intel PRO/1000MT (82573L) rev 0x00: msi, address 00:30:48:d1:31:43 uhci3 at pci0 dev 29 function 0 Intel 82801I USB rev 0x02: apic 2 int 23 uhci4 at pci0 dev 29 function 1 Intel 82801I USB rev 0x02: apic 2 int 22 uhci5 at pci0 dev 29 function 2 Intel 82801I USB rev 0x02: apic 2 int 18 ehci1 at pci0 dev 29 function 7 Intel 82801I USB rev 0x02: apic 2 int 23 usb1 at ehci1: USB revision 2.0 uhub1 at usb1 Intel EHCI root hub rev 2.00/1.00 addr 1 ppb6 at pci0 dev 30 function 0 Intel 82801BA Hub-to-PCI rev 0x92 pci7 at ppb6 bus 17 vga1 at pci7 dev 4 function 0 ATI
Re: xf86-video-intel driver broken after 2011/11/29
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 01:04:52AM +, Owain Ainsworth wrote: For some stupid reason the x driver is still trying to submit commands to the gpu while vt switched (this is verboten, and returns with EBUSY). What are you running in X at the time? I can't reproduce this issue to try and fix it. I have the same issue. I mailed it to x11@ a few days ago: http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-x11m=132865830223969w=2 And yep, I use startx. -- Best Regards Edd Barrett http://www.theunixzoo.co.uk
iwn0 firmware errors
Hi, I have just upgraded from a thinkpad x60s to an x61s. The machine came with an iwn wireless card (no suprise really). After installing the firmware with fw_update, you can start using the card but very shortly start to see firmware errors. Once I managed to get an address via DHCP, but that is about as much as I can achieve. Probably not a huge amount we can do if the firmware is buggy, but worth mentioning anyway. In the meantime I am using a usb urtwn. Dmesg follows: OpenBSD 5.1 (GENERIC.MP) #184: Thu Feb 9 13:37:23 MST 2012 dera...@i386.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC.MP cpu0: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T7300 @ 2.00GHz (GenuineIntel 686-class) 2 GHz cpu0: FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,NXE,LONG,SSE3,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,EST,TM2,SSSE3,CX16,xTPR,PDCM,LAHF real mem = 2120470528 (2022MB) avail mem = 2075664384 (1979MB) mainbus0 at root bios0 at mainbus0: AT/286+ BIOS, date 07/29/08, BIOS32 rev. 0 @ 0xfdc80, SMBIOS rev. 2.4 @ 0xe0010 (63 entries) bios0: vendor LENOVO version 7NETB7WW (2.17 ) date 07/29/2008 bios0: LENOVO 7674FA9 acpi0 at bios0: rev 2 acpi0: sleep states S0 S3 S4 S5 acpi0: tables DSDT FACP SSDT ECDT TCPA APIC MCFG HPET SLIC BOOT ASF! SSDT SSDT SSDT SSDT acpi0: wakeup devices LID_(S3) SLPB(S3) DURT(S3) IGBE(S4) EXP0(S4) EXP1(S4) EXP2(S4) EXP3(S4) EXP4(S4) PCI1(S4) USB0(S3) USB1(S3) USB2(S3) USB3(S3) USB4(S3) EHC0(S3) EHC1(S3) HDEF(S4) acpitimer0 at acpi0: 3579545 Hz, 24 bits acpiec0 at acpi0 acpimadt0 at acpi0 addr 0xfee0: PC-AT compat cpu0 at mainbus0: apid 0 (boot processor) cpu0: apic clock running at 199MHz cpu1 at mainbus0: apid 1 (application processor) cpu1: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T7300 @ 2.00GHz (GenuineIntel 686-class) 2 GHz cpu1: FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,NXE,LONG,SSE3,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,EST,TM2,SSSE3,CX16,xTPR,PDCM,LAHF ioapic0 at mainbus0: apid 1 pa 0xfec0, version 20, 24 pins ioapic0: misconfigured as apic 2, remapped to apid 1 acpimcfg0 at acpi0 addr 0xf000, bus 0-63 acpihpet0 at acpi0: 14318179 Hz acpiprt0 at acpi0: bus 0 (PCI0) acpiprt1 at acpi0: bus -1 (AGP_) acpiprt2 at acpi0: bus 2 (EXP0) acpiprt3 at acpi0: bus 3 (EXP1) acpiprt4 at acpi0: bus -1 (EXP2) acpiprt5 at acpi0: bus -1 (EXP3) acpiprt6 at acpi0: bus -1 (EXP4) acpiprt7 at acpi0: bus 5 (PCI1) acpicpu0 at acpi0: C3, C2, C1, PSS acpicpu1 at acpi0: C3, C2, C1, PSS acpipwrres0 at acpi0: PUBS acpitz0 at acpi0: critical temperature is 127 degC acpitz1 at acpi0: critical temperature is 99 degC acpibtn0 at acpi0: LID_ acpibtn1 at acpi0: SLPB acpibat0 at acpi0: BAT0 model 42T4506 serial 1833 type LION oem SANYO acpibat1 at acpi0: BAT1 not present acpibat2 at acpi0: BAT2 not present acpiac0 at acpi0: AC unit offline acpithinkpad0 at acpi0 acpidock0 at acpi0: GDCK not docked (0) bios0: ROM list: 0xc/0x1! 0xd/0x1000 0xd1000/0x1000 0xe/0x1! cpu0: Enhanced SpeedStep 1996 MHz: speeds: 2001, 2000, 1600, 1200, 800 MHz pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0: configuration mode 1 (bios) pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 Intel GM965 Host rev 0x0c vga1 at pci0 dev 2 function 0 Intel GM965 Video rev 0x0c wsdisplay0 at vga1 mux 1: console (80x25, vt100 emulation) wsdisplay0: screen 1-5 added (80x25, vt100 emulation) intagp0 at vga1 agp0 at intagp0: aperture at 0xe000, size 0x1000 inteldrm0 at vga1: apic 1 int 16 drm0 at inteldrm0 Intel GM965 Video rev 0x0c at pci0 dev 2 function 1 not configured em0 at pci0 dev 25 function 0 Intel ICH8 IGP M AMT rev 0x03: msi, address 00:1d:72:9a:f2:fd uhci0 at pci0 dev 26 function 0 Intel 82801H USB rev 0x03: apic 1 int 20 uhci1 at pci0 dev 26 function 1 Intel 82801H USB rev 0x03: apic 1 int 21 ehci0 at pci0 dev 26 function 7 Intel 82801H USB rev 0x03: apic 1 int 22 usb0 at ehci0: USB revision 2.0 uhub0 at usb0 Intel EHCI root hub rev 2.00/1.00 addr 1 azalia0 at pci0 dev 27 function 0 Intel 82801H HD Audio rev 0x03: msi azalia0: codecs: Analog Devices AD1984, Conexant/0x2bfa, using Analog Devices AD1984 audio0 at azalia0 ppb0 at pci0 dev 28 function 0 Intel 82801H PCIE rev 0x03: apic 1 int 20 pci1 at ppb0 bus 2 ppb1 at pci0 dev 28 function 1 Intel 82801H PCIE rev 0x03: apic 1 int 21 pci2 at ppb1 bus 3 iwn0 at pci2 dev 0 function 0 Intel Wireless WiFi Link 4965 rev 0x61: msi, MIMO 2T3R, MoW2, address 00:21:5c:4f:4e:9b uhci2 at pci0 dev 29 function 0 Intel 82801H USB rev 0x03: apic 1 int 16 uhci3 at pci0 dev 29 function 1 Intel 82801H USB rev 0x03: apic 1 int 17 ehci1 at pci0 dev 29 function 7 Intel 82801H USB rev 0x03: apic 1 int 19 usb1 at ehci1: USB revision 2.0 uhub1 at usb1 Intel EHCI root hub rev 2.00/1.00 addr 1 ppb2 at pci0 dev 30 function 0 Intel 82801BAM Hub-to-PCI rev 0xf3 pci3 at ppb2 bus 5 cbb0 at pci3 dev 0 function 0 Ricoh 5C476 CardBus rev 0xba: apic 1 int 16 Ricoh 5C832 Firewire rev 0x04 at pci3 dev 0 function 1 not configured sdhc0 at pci3 dev 0
Re: fix incorrect document titles in several man pages
Hi Christiano, Christiano F. Haesbaert wrote on Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 10:26:18AM -0200: Reads fine to me, any objections ? That's OK schwarze@, but don't forget that the tree is locked and you need an OK deraadt@ as well. Yours, Ingo Index: src/bin/md5/sha256.1 === RCS file: /cvs/src/bin/md5/sha256.1,v retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -p -r1.3 sha256.1 --- src/bin/md5/sha256.13 Sep 2010 09:53:20 - 1.3 +++ src/bin/md5/sha256.110 Feb 2012 05:41:09 - @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ .\ Materiel Command, USAF, under agreement number F39502-99-1-0512. .\ .Dd $Mdocdate: September 3 2010 $ -.Dt SHA1 1 +.Dt SHA256 1 .Os .Sh NAME .Nm sha256 Index: src/lib/libc/rpc/rpcauth.3 === RCS file: /cvs/src/lib/libc/rpc/rpcauth.3,v retrieving revision 1.15 diff -u -p -r1.15 rpcauth.3 --- src/lib/libc/rpc/rpcauth.3 7 Sep 2010 19:52:37 - 1.15 +++ src/lib/libc/rpc/rpcauth.3 10 Feb 2012 05:41:09 - @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ .\ OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. .\ .Dd $Mdocdate: September 7 2010 $ -.Dt RPC 3 +.Dt RPCAUTH 3 .Os .Sh NAME .Nm auth_destroy , Index: src/lib/libc/time/wcsftime.3 === RCS file: /cvs/src/lib/libc/time/wcsftime.3,v retrieving revision 1.1 diff -u -p -r1.1 wcsftime.3 --- src/lib/libc/time/wcsftime.310 Oct 2011 14:40:25 - 1.1 +++ src/lib/libc/time/wcsftime.310 Feb 2012 05:41:09 - @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ .\ OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE. .\ .Dd $Mdocdate: October 10 2011 $ -.Dt STRFTIME 3 +.Dt WCSFTIME 3 .Os .Sh NAME .Nm wcsftime Index: src/lib/libm/man/sin.3 === RCS file: /cvs/src/lib/libm/man/sin.3,v retrieving revision 1.13 diff -u -p -r1.13 sin.3 --- src/lib/libm/man/sin.3 7 Jul 2011 01:34:52 - 1.13 +++ src/lib/libm/man/sin.3 10 Feb 2012 05:41:09 - @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ .\ from: @(#)cos.35.1 (Berkeley) 5/2/91 .\ .Dd $Mdocdate: July 7 2011 $ -.Dt COS 3 +.Dt SIN 3 .Os .Sh NAME .Nm sin , Index: src/libexec/login_krb5/login_krb5.8 === RCS file: /cvs/src/libexec/login_krb5/login_krb5.8,v retrieving revision 1.16 diff -u -p -r1.16 login_krb5.8 --- src/libexec/login_krb5/login_krb5.8 1 Feb 2012 17:32:59 - 1.16 +++ src/libexec/login_krb5/login_krb5.8 10 Feb 2012 05:41:09 - @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ .\ OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE. .\ .Dd $Mdocdate: February 1 2012 $ -.Dt LOGIN_KERBEROS 8 +.Dt LOGIN_KRB5 8 .Os .Sh NAME .Nm login_krb5 Index: src/usr.bin/bgplg/bgplgsh.8 === RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/bgplg/bgplgsh.8,v retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -p -r1.5 bgplgsh.8 --- src/usr.bin/bgplg/bgplgsh.8 13 Oct 2010 18:56:03 - 1.5 +++ src/usr.bin/bgplg/bgplgsh.8 10 Feb 2012 05:41:09 - @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ .\ OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE. .\ .Dd $Mdocdate: October 13 2010 $ -.Dt BGPLG 8 +.Dt BGPLGSH 8 .Os .Sh NAME .Nm bgplgsh
Re: fix incorrect document titles in several man pages
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 10:26:18AM -0200, Christiano F. Haesbaert wrote: Reads fine to me, any objections ? jmc ? i had just filed this under look at after lock, but if you want to take it on, that's fine. note there is no rpcauth function, so that page should probably be renamed (to something which does exist). except for that niggle, the rest of the diff looks correct. jmc On 10 February 2012 03:50, Lawrence Teo l...@lteo.net wrote: This diff fixes several man pages that have incorrect document titles (.Dt). Lawrence Index: src/bin/md5/sha256.1 === RCS file: /cvs/src/bin/md5/sha256.1,v retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -p -r1.3 sha256.1 --- src/bin/md5/sha256.1 ? ? ? ?3 Sep 2010 09:53:20 - ? ? ? 1.3 +++ src/bin/md5/sha256.1 ? ? ? ?10 Feb 2012 05:41:09 - @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ ?.\ Materiel Command, USAF, under agreement number F39502-99-1-0512. ?.\ ?.Dd $Mdocdate: September 3 2010 $ -.Dt SHA1 1 +.Dt SHA256 1 ?.Os ?.Sh NAME ?.Nm sha256 Index: src/lib/libc/rpc/rpcauth.3 === RCS file: /cvs/src/lib/libc/rpc/rpcauth.3,v retrieving revision 1.15 diff -u -p -r1.15 rpcauth.3 --- src/lib/libc/rpc/rpcauth.3 ?7 Sep 2010 19:52:37 - ? ? ? 1.15 +++ src/lib/libc/rpc/rpcauth.3 ?10 Feb 2012 05:41:09 - @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ ?.\ ? OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. ?.\ ?.Dd $Mdocdate: September 7 2010 $ -.Dt RPC 3 +.Dt RPCAUTH 3 ?.Os ?.Sh NAME ?.Nm auth_destroy , Index: src/lib/libc/time/wcsftime.3 === RCS file: /cvs/src/lib/libc/time/wcsftime.3,v retrieving revision 1.1 diff -u -p -r1.1 wcsftime.3 --- src/lib/libc/time/wcsftime.3 ? ? ? ?10 Oct 2011 14:40:25 - ? ? ?1.1 +++ src/lib/libc/time/wcsftime.3 ? ? ? ?10 Feb 2012 05:41:09 - @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ ?.\ OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE. ?.\ ?.Dd $Mdocdate: October 10 2011 $ -.Dt STRFTIME 3 +.Dt WCSFTIME 3 ?.Os ?.Sh NAME ?.Nm wcsftime Index: src/lib/libm/man/sin.3 === RCS file: /cvs/src/lib/libm/man/sin.3,v retrieving revision 1.13 diff -u -p -r1.13 sin.3 --- src/lib/libm/man/sin.3 ? ? ?7 Jul 2011 01:34:52 - ? ? ? 1.13 +++ src/lib/libm/man/sin.3 ? ? ?10 Feb 2012 05:41:09 - @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ ?.\ ? ? from: @(#)cos.3 ? ? ? ?5.1 (Berkeley) 5/2/91 ?.\ ?.Dd $Mdocdate: July 7 2011 $ -.Dt COS 3 +.Dt SIN 3 ?.Os ?.Sh NAME ?.Nm sin , Index: src/libexec/login_krb5/login_krb5.8 === RCS file: /cvs/src/libexec/login_krb5/login_krb5.8,v retrieving revision 1.16 diff -u -p -r1.16 login_krb5.8 --- src/libexec/login_krb5/login_krb5.8 1 Feb 2012 17:32:59 - ? ? ? 1.16 +++ src/libexec/login_krb5/login_krb5.8 10 Feb 2012 05:41:09 - @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ ?.\ OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE. ?.\ ?.Dd $Mdocdate: February 1 2012 $ -.Dt LOGIN_KERBEROS 8 +.Dt LOGIN_KRB5 8 ?.Os ?.Sh NAME ?.Nm login_krb5 Index: src/usr.bin/bgplg/bgplgsh.8 === RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/bgplg/bgplgsh.8,v retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -p -r1.5 bgplgsh.8 --- src/usr.bin/bgplg/bgplgsh.8 13 Oct 2010 18:56:03 - ? ? ?1.5 +++ src/usr.bin/bgplg/bgplgsh.8 10 Feb 2012 05:41:09 - @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ ?.\ OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE. ?.\ ?.Dd $Mdocdate: October 13 2010 $ -.Dt BGPLG 8 +.Dt BGPLGSH 8 ?.Os ?.Sh NAME ?.Nm bgplgsh
Re: xf86-video-intel driver broken after 2011/11/29
Hi Owain, From a look at the kernel code and a look at your X log it looks like this spamming is happening only while you are vt switched away from X. correct. another symptom is that xorg _does_not_ refresh the screen. this is why I inadvertently duplicated dmesg and Xorg.0.log. (you use startx, right? else that shouldn't appear on the console, it's an X message) correct again. snip For some stupid reason the x driver is still trying to submit commands to the gpu while vt switched (this is verboten, and returns with EBUSY). What are you running in X at the time? I can't reproduce this issue to try and fix it. I have reproduced the same error with an i386 x60s Thinkpad. I source startx, and start firefox-10.0. the x60s was tested with the Feb. 7th snap. snip Here is Xorg.0.log.old: snip [1595812.018] (II) intel(0): Printing probed modes for output LVDS [1595812.018] (II) intel(0): Modeline 1440x900x60.0 102.00 1440 1488 1520 1836 900 903 909 926 -hsync -vsync (55.6 kHz) [1595812.018] (II) intel(0): Modeline 1440x900x50.0 85.00 1440 1488 1520 1836 900 903 909 926 -hsync -vsync (46.3 kHz) snip [1595812.870] (II) intel(0): Allocated new frame buffer 1472x900 stride 6144, tiled snip [1595822.857] (EE) intel(0): Failed to submit batch buffer, expect rendering corruption or even a frozen display: Device busy. snip Is the failure to submit the batch buffer because the frame buffer is 1472x900 when it should be 1440x900? Thanks, Dave.
Re: zlib 1.2.6
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 02:23:04 + From: Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org *obviously* this is not for now (it hasn't even gone through a mkr yet and I haven't touched the manpage). but I was interested to see what the speed difference was like (answer: small improvement only) and since I'd done it anyway I might as well post it to save anyone else the trouble of porting our changes across. A big question is whether we want the largefile z_off64_t bullshit that this brings.
