Re: Typo in nfs_boot.c

2013-12-30 Thread matteo filippetto
2013/9/12 Eivind Evensen eivi...@terraplane.org:
 Hello.

 Trying to figure out what I've done wrong to have a diskless setup
 boot the kernel and then try to talk to a broadcast address rather than
 the nfsserver, I saw this typo.

 Eivind


Hi,

I think I have the same problem as, when booting a client, I get RPC
timeout for server 192.168.100.255

how did you solve the problem of talking to a broadcast address? or,
what am I doing wrong?

Thanks


-- 
Matteo Filippetto
http://www.op83.eu



Re: Typo in nfs_boot.c

2013-12-30 Thread matteo filippetto
2013/12/30 matteo filippetto matteo.filippe...@gmail.com:
 2013/9/12 Eivind Evensen eivi...@terraplane.org:
 Hello.

 Trying to figure out what I've done wrong to have a diskless setup
 boot the kernel and then try to talk to a broadcast address rather than
 the nfsserver, I saw this typo.

 Eivind


 Hi,

 I think I have the same problem as, when booting a client, I get RPC
 timeout for server 192.168.100.255

 how did you solve the problem of talking to a broadcast address? or,
 what am I doing wrong?

 Thanks

Ok, just solved the problem: start mountd at boot.

Regards

-- 
Matteo Filippetto
http://www.op83.eu



Re: alc(4) support for Atheros AR815x

2011-06-29 Thread matteo filippetto
 Hi,

 I have a eeepc 1001pxd with Attansic Technology L2C working
 and this patch didn't break the nic.

 One problem: very slow connectioncan I help?
 try to make some tests?


Just an update: slow connection was a problem with my AP wifi.

So my device is working well.

Thank you, best regards

-- 
Matteo Filippetto
http://op83.blogspot.com



Re: alc(4) support for Atheros AR815x

2011-06-28 Thread matteo filippetto
2011/5/16 Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org:
 So far, only had reports from L1C and the new devices (which is
 not the point of sending out this sort of diff). This is a fairly
 large diff and changes behaviour for existing devices.

 Has anyone with a currently-working L2C tested this to make sure
 it doesn't break their nic?


Hi,

I have a eeepc 1001pxd with Attansic Technology L2C working
and this patch didn't break the nic.

One problem: very slow connectioncan I help?
try to make some tests?

Latest snapshot of i386.

Attached dmesg and pcidump.

Best regards.

Matteo Filippetto
Domain /dev/pci0:
 0:0:0: Intel Pineview DMI
0x: Vendor ID: 8086 Product ID: a010
0x0004: Command: 0006 Status ID: 2090
0x0008: Class: 06 Subclass: 00 Interface: 00 Revision: 00
0x000c: BIST: 00 Header Type: 00 Latency Timer: 00 Cache Line Size: 00
0x0010: BAR empty ()
0x0014: BAR empty ()
0x0018: BAR empty ()
0x001c: BAR empty ()
0x0020: BAR empty ()
0x0024: BAR empty ()
0x0028: Cardbus CIS: 
0x002c: Subsystem Vendor ID: 1043 Product ID: 83ac
0x0030: Expansion ROM Base Address: 
0x0038: 
0x003c: Interrupt Pin: 00 Line: 00 Min Gnt: 00 Max Lat: 00
0x00e0: Capability 0x09: Vendor Specific
 0:2:0: Intel Pineview Video
0x: Vendor ID: 8086 Product ID: a011
0x0004: Command: 0007 Status ID: 0090
0x0008: Class: 03 Subclass: 00 Interface: 00 Revision: 00
0x000c: BIST: 00 Header Type: 80 Latency Timer: 00 Cache Line Size: 00
0x0010: BAR mem 32bit addr: 0xf7e0/0x0008
0x0014: BAR io addr: 0xdc00/0x0008
0x0018: BAR mem prefetchable 32bit addr: 0xd000/0x1000
0x001c: BAR mem 32bit addr: 0xf7d0/0x0010
0x0020: BAR empty ()
0x0024: BAR empty ()
0x0028: Cardbus CIS: 
0x002c: Subsystem Vendor ID: 1043 Product ID: 83ac
0x0030: Expansion ROM Base Address: 
0x0038: 
0x003c: Interrupt Pin: 01 Line: 0f Min Gnt: 00 Max Lat: 00
0x0090: Capability 0x05: Message Signaled Interrupts (MSI)
0x00d0: Capability 0x01: Power Management
 0:2:1: Intel Pineview Video
0x: Vendor ID: 8086 Product ID: a012
0x0004: Command: 0007 Status ID: 0090
0x0008: Class: 03 Subclass: 80 Interface: 00 Revision: 00
0x000c: BIST: 00 Header Type: 80 Latency Timer: 00 Cache Line Size: 00
0x0010: BAR mem 32bit addr: 0xf7e8/0x0008
0x0014: BAR empty ()
0x0018: BAR empty ()
0x001c: BAR empty ()
0x0020: BAR empty ()
0x0024: BAR empty ()
0x0028: Cardbus CIS: 
0x002c: Subsystem Vendor ID: 1043 Product ID: 83ac
0x0030: Expansion ROM Base Address: 
0x0038: 
0x003c: Interrupt Pin: 00 Line: 00 Min Gnt: 00 Max Lat: 00
0x00d0: Capability 0x01: Power Management
 0:27:0: Intel 82801GB HD Audio
0x: Vendor ID: 8086 Product ID: 27d8
0x0004: Command: 0006 Status ID: 0010
0x0008: Class: 04 Subclass: 03 Interface: 00 Revision: 02
0x000c: BIST: 00 Header Type: 00 Latency Timer: 00 Cache Line Size: 08
0x0010: BAR mem 64bit addr: 0xf7cf8000/0x4000
0x0018: BAR empty ()
0x001c: BAR empty ()
0x0020: BAR empty ()
0x0024: BAR empty ()
0x0028: Cardbus CIS: 
0x002c: Subsystem Vendor ID: 1043 Product ID: 8442
0x0030: Expansion ROM Base Address: 
0x0038: 
0x003c: Interrupt Pin: 01 Line: 04 Min Gnt: 00 Max Lat: 00
0x0050: Capability 0x01: Power Management
0x0060: Capability 0x05: Message Signaled Interrupts (MSI)
0x0070: Capability 0x10: PCI Express
 0:28:0: Intel 82801GB PCIE
0x: Vendor ID: 8086 Product ID: 27d0
0x0004: Command: 0104 Status ID: 0010
0x0008: Class: 06 Subclass: 04 Interface: 00 Revision: 02
0x000c: BIST: 00 Header Type: 81 Latency Timer: 00 Cache Line Size: 08
0x0010: 
0x0014: 
0x0018: Primary Bus: 0 Secondary Bus: 4 Subordinate Bus: 4 
Secondary Latency Timer: 00
0x001c: I/O Base: f0 I/O Limit: 00 Secondary Status: 2000
0x0020: Memory Base: fff0 Memory Limit: 
0x0024: Prefetch Memory Base: fff1 Prefetch Memory Limit: 0001
0x0028: Prefetch Memory Base Upper 32 Bits: 
0x002c: Prefetch Memory Limit Upper 32 Bits: 
0x0030: I/O Base Upper 16 Bits:  I/O Limit Upper 16 Bits: 
0x0038: Expansion ROM Base Address: 
0x003c: Interrupt Pin: 01 Line: 0f Bridge Control: 0002
0x0040: Capability 0x10

Re: which ISO for a VM?

2010-04-06 Thread matteo filippetto
2010/4/5 Richard Stride f...@nexxus.net:
 Sean Kennedy wrote:

 I concur, B it was a Valid question on running OpenBSD in a VM.

 Unless someone has answered directly, I'll short-run it here.



 Just to add my 2 cents, I run OpenBSD-current (i386) under VirtualBox 3.0.4
 r50677 64-bit. The host operating system is Slackware 13 64 bit.
 I got to -current by installing OpenBSD 4.3 from the ISO image, and
followed
 the upgrade guide from the OpenBSD website.
 Be warned, all I use that VM for is to compile the OpenBSD sources, it does
 nothing else.

 I have tried running OpenBSD under other versions of VirtualBox using
 different host operating systems, however there were always issues which
 would generally lead to various issues including kernel panics.

 My advice is to not run it virtualized.

 Rich



I run 3 openbsd 4.6 virtualized with VBox (3.1.6 ) on a MacBook
and I have no problem running services as DHCP, HTTP, DNS
and others.

Best regards

--
Matteo Filippetto