Re: Dired diff
This was meant to be private communication. Please disregard it. I meant we can move on, instead of ``committed.'' On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Loganaden Velvindron wrote: > Hi Nima, > > Mark made the diff faster :-) > > Can you please test this one and reply to tech@, once you're done, it's > committed ;-) > > > > > On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 9:50 PM, Nima Hoda wrote: > >> On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 08:47:12PM +0400, Loganaden Velvindron wrote: >> > I'm over-stretching it, but on -current this compiles >> > with warnings :-D >> > >> > Can you test this diff and report on tech@ please :-) ? >> >> Works fine and compiles without warnings. I tested on 4.8/amd64 and >> on current/loongson. >> >> Cheers, >> -Nima >> -- >> The pudding is in the proof. >> > > > > -- > `` Real men run current !'' > > > > > > -- `` Real men run current !''
Re: Dired diff
Hi Nima, Mark made the diff faster :-) Can you please test this one and reply to tech@, once you're done, it's committed ;-) On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 9:50 PM, Nima Hoda wrote: > On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 08:47:12PM +0400, Loganaden Velvindron wrote: > > I'm over-stretching it, but on -current this compiles > > with warnings :-D > > > > Can you test this diff and report on tech@ please :-) ? > > Works fine and compiles without warnings. I tested on 4.8/amd64 and > on current/loongson. > > Cheers, > -Nima > -- > The pudding is in the proof. > -- `` Real men run current !'' [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/octet-stream which had a name of dired.c.patch]
Re: Dired diff
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 08:47:12PM +0400, Loganaden Velvindron wrote: > I'm over-stretching it, but on -current this compiles > with warnings :-D > > Can you test this diff and report on tech@ please :-) ? Works fine and compiles without warnings. I tested on 4.8/amd64 and on current/loongson. Cheers, -Nima -- The pudding is in the proof.
Re: Dired diff
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 05:27:40PM +0400, Loganaden Velvindron wrote: > I have improved it further by simplifying it. Can you test & report > this one to tech@ instead ? > > http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=131367237631197&w=2 Tested this (on amd64) and it seems to work ok. Thanks again for your work on this. Cheers, -Nima -- The pudding is in the proof.
