Re: m_copym2 is unused, let's remove it

2016-09-13 Thread Claudio Jeker 
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 02:46:27PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> Yes, this is just a conservative first step to that.

OK on the first step. I hope more follow :)
 
> On 14 Sep 2016 12:00 p.m., "Todd C. Miller" 
> wrote:
> 
> > Looks OK.  Do you intend to change m_copym0 to m_copym and remove
> > the deep copy code?
> >
> >  - todd
> >

-- 
:wq Claudio

Re: m_copym2 is unused, let's remove it

2016-09-13 Thread David Gwynne 
Yes, this is just a conservative first step to that.

On 14 Sep 2016 12:00 p.m., "Todd C. Miller" 
wrote:

> Looks OK.  Do you intend to change m_copym0 to m_copym and remove
> the deep copy code?
>
>  - todd
>

Re: m_copym2 is unused, let's remove it

2016-09-13 Thread Todd C. Miller 
Looks OK.  Do you intend to change m_copym0 to m_copym and remove
the deep copy code?

 - todd

Re: m_copym2 is unused, let's remove it

2016-09-13 Thread David Gwynne 

> On 14 Sep 2016, at 11:08, David Gwynne  wrote:
> 
> ok?
> 
> Index: sys/arch/amd64/conf/GENERIC
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/arch/amd64/conf/GENERIC,v
> retrieving revision 1.433
> diff -u -p -r1.433 GENERIC
> --- sys/arch/amd64/conf/GENERIC   12 Sep 2016 08:28:44 -  1.433
> +++ sys/arch/amd64/conf/GENERIC   13 Sep 2016 23:54:46 -
> @@ -27,6 +27,8 @@ option  HIBERNATE   # Hibernate support
> 
> configbsd swap generic
> 
> +makeoption DEBUG="-g"
> +
> mainbus0 at root
> 
> bios0 at mainbus?

ignore this chunk

dlg