Re: re(4) mtu >1500
I like MIMO/SISO better than 1x1 2x2 etc. Fix that shit :) Stuart Henderson [st...@openbsd.org] wrote: > On 2014/10/06 12:19, Chris Cappuccio wrote: > > Stuart Henderson [s...@spacehopper.org] wrote: > > > Does anyone have an idea of what's needed for working jumbos on the > > > RL_FLAG_JUMBOV2 variants of re(4) where they're currently disabled? > > > These seem to account for most of the chips seen in hardware > > > designs from the last couple of years (including APU and some others). > > > > > > if ((sc->rl_flags & RL_FLAG_JUMBOV2) == 0) > > > ifp->if_hardmtu = sc->rl_max_mtu; > > > > > > > I think the secrets are here :) > > > > http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/releng/10.1/sys/dev/re/if_re.c?revision=272461&view=markup > > > > Ah, more specifically > > http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=217499 / > http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/sys/dev/re/if_re.c?r1=217498&r2=217499&pathrev=217499 > > OK that's probably more than I can figure out how to port without > hardware then.. -- The bums will always lose
Re: re(4) mtu >1500
On 2014/10/06 12:19, Chris Cappuccio wrote: > Stuart Henderson [s...@spacehopper.org] wrote: > > Does anyone have an idea of what's needed for working jumbos on the > > RL_FLAG_JUMBOV2 variants of re(4) where they're currently disabled? > > These seem to account for most of the chips seen in hardware > > designs from the last couple of years (including APU and some others). > > > > if ((sc->rl_flags & RL_FLAG_JUMBOV2) == 0) > > ifp->if_hardmtu = sc->rl_max_mtu; > > > > I think the secrets are here :) > > http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/releng/10.1/sys/dev/re/if_re.c?revision=272461&view=markup > Ah, more specifically http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=217499 / http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/sys/dev/re/if_re.c?r1=217498&r2=217499&pathrev=217499 OK that's probably more than I can figure out how to port without hardware then..
Re: re(4) mtu >1500
Stuart Henderson [s...@spacehopper.org] wrote: > Does anyone have an idea of what's needed for working jumbos on the > RL_FLAG_JUMBOV2 variants of re(4) where they're currently disabled? > These seem to account for most of the chips seen in hardware > designs from the last couple of years (including APU and some others). > > if ((sc->rl_flags & RL_FLAG_JUMBOV2) == 0) > ifp->if_hardmtu = sc->rl_max_mtu; > I think the secrets are here :) http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/releng/10.1/sys/dev/re/if_re.c?revision=272461&view=markup
re(4) mtu >1500
Does anyone have an idea of what's needed for working jumbos on the RL_FLAG_JUMBOV2 variants of re(4) where they're currently disabled? These seem to account for most of the chips seen in hardware designs from the last couple of years (including APU and some others). if ((sc->rl_flags & RL_FLAG_JUMBOV2) == 0) ifp->if_hardmtu = sc->rl_max_mtu; Thanks.