Re: patch: MFSv3 support (libsa) for boot2 (i386)

[Evgeniy Ivanov]

Hi,

On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 10:28 PM, Izumi Tsutsui  wrote:
>> Here're patches to implement MINIX File System v3 support in libsa.
>> Support for MFS is added to the boot2 for i386.
>
> Could you also file this patch to database via send-pr?
> (patch in PR, calling for review on tech list)
> http://www.NetBSD.org/support/send-pr.html

Sure.

> With a quick glance, 'mfs' in NetBSD means memory based file system
> (in sys/ufs/mfs) so other name (which implies MINIX) would be better.

Is MinixFS OK?



-- 
Evgeniy

Re: patch: MFSv3 support (libsa) for boot2 (i386)

[Izumi Tsutsui]

> Here're patches to implement MINIX File System v3 support in libsa.
> Support for MFS is added to the boot2 for i386.

Could you also file this patch to database via send-pr?
(patch in PR, calling for review on tech list)
http://www.NetBSD.org/support/send-pr.html


With a quick glance, 'mfs' in NetBSD means memory based file system
(in sys/ufs/mfs) so other name (which implies MINIX) would be better.
---
Izumi Tsutsiu

Modules and debug info

[Nick Hudson]

[please CC me as I'm not subscribed]

Folks,

Does anyone have any objections to me committing this?

I've been building with MKDEBUG=yes DBG="-g -O2" and modules built with this 
get debug output which i) is useless and ii) creates unaligned relocs which my 
kobj_reloc doesn't handle.

Nick
Index: sys/modules/xldscripts/kmodule
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/src/sys/modules/xldscripts/kmodule,v
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -p -r1.2 kmodule
--- sys/modules/xldscripts/kmodule	1 Jun 2010 22:13:30 -	1.2
+++ sys/modules/xldscripts/kmodule	22 Dec 2011 11:24:33 -
@@ -19,5 +19,6 @@ SECTIONS
/DISCARD/ :
{
  *(.comment)
+ *(.debug*)
}
 }