Re: Strange bug in F14: gnome-settings-daemon, Firefox ramp up to high CPU usage

2011-01-18 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
 Hi, folks. Before I file a bug on this I was wondering if anyone else
 had seen it and hoping to get a better idea of exactly what's happening.

 Lately, on this machine - a laptop running F14 - it seems that every so
 often, gnome-settings-daemon, firefox and one other process (I forget
 which, something else that's part of GNOME I think) suddenly go crazy,
 pegging out the CPU (which is dual-core) entirely and also showing huge
 virtual size (virt column in top) - in the 60-70GB range. One thing that
 sometimes triggers this is, sometimes, trying to play some music in
 audacious; usually it works, but sometimes it returns 'input/output
 error', PulseAudio crashes, and this bug happens immediately. But
 sometimes the same problem with gnome-settings-daemon and firefox
 happens without being triggered by loading music.

 Has anyone else seen this? Any ideas what's going on?

I've seen this issue earlier in the Fedora release cycle. I saw is
with g-s-d plus a bunch of random apps including (from mem) firefox,
evolution, pidgin etc. This is a dual core i5 with hyperthreading (OS
sees 4 cpus). It seemed that it was mostly due to constraints on RAM
and I think it was made worse by the fact that I run a LUKS encrypted
disk as it made matters worse when things had to swap. The problem
improved greatly when I went from 2 to 3 gig of ram and I rarely see
it now I have 4 (not that its an excuse), I don't think the problems
fixed.

Oeter
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


[Test-Announce] Call for reviewing TCMS use cases and comparison!

2011-01-18 Thread He Rui
Greetings!

Wiki workflow/use cases are reorganized and grouped by general and main
test events(runs) use cases. The general cases cover the basic uses of
wiki, and the events cases covers the detailed certain steps for
organizing the events.

Please review it:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Rhe/tcms_use_cases


Meanwhile, Wiki and Nitrate comparison is also listed and grouped by
above use cases. I've listed as many features as I can think out for
comparison. Please have a look and see if any features are missed. You
can review it by the use case you're familiar with if reviewing all of
them is tough, but be aware that features compared in former use cases
are not listed in later cases again to avoid overlaps:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Rhe/tcms_Comparison

 
Ticket#152[1] is currently set up for tracking this event. Feel free to
add comments or discuss it here. 

Note: the feedback deadline is Jan 21, the end of this week. After that
date, I'll move forward to the next phase. 

Waiting for your feedback!

Cheers,
Hurry

[1] https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/152

-- 
Contacts

Hurry
FAS Name: Rhe 
Timezone: UTC+8
TEL: 86-010-62608141
IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh

___
test-announce mailing list
test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


Please test: gpodder 2.12

2011-01-18 Thread Ville-Pekka Vainio
Hi testers,

The gpodder 2.12 update has recently landed in updates-testing. If there
are any gPodder users on this list, I'd appreciate it if you could test
the packages. This update jumps four minor versions, but most of the
changes are bug fixes. Even so, it'd be nice to know that the new
packages work for others as well.

F-14: http://ur1.ca/2whz5
F-13: http://ur1.ca/2wi04

The updates shouldn't break gPodder's sqlite database, but to be sure,
you can backup your database and podcasts by running
 gpodder-backup --create archive.gpo.tar.gz
before installing the updates.

If you have an MTP device, please test the MTP sync feature as well, the
new gpodder package pulls in python-mtp as a dependency.

Thanks!

-- 
Ville-Pekka Vainio

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


Re: audio skipping/pure sound quality

2011-01-18 Thread Richard Ryniker
I have experienced effects like those you described when Pulseaudio (or
perhaps something else in the audio-processing chain) must do sample-rate
conversion, such as from 44.1 KHz to 48KHz, to drive my USB speakers.

Sox has been an effective solution for me.  Try play (a link to sox that
denotes output to sound hardware instead of a file) to learn whether sox
may offer superior sample-rate conversion that avoids the problems you
hear.

There are probably a handful of tools that will display information
about sound devices.  Audacity has a convenient one:

Help - Audio Device Info

that displays supported sample rates.  For example, I see:

Default capture device number: 13
Default playback device number: 13
==
Device ID: 0
Device name: ALSA: Bose USB Audio: USB Audio (hw:0,0)
Input channels: 0
Output channels: 6
Low Input Latency: -1.00
Low Output Latency: 0.010667
High Input Latency: -1.00
High Output Latency: 0.042667
Supported Rates:
48000
==

Output like this may display a needed sample rate for your USB sound
device (48000 in my case).  If you use sox to convert a file to the
target rate before you play it, and it then sounds good, this confirms
the problem involves resampling.
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


Re: [Fedora QA] #159: Network Device Naming Test Day

2011-01-18 Thread Fedora QA
#159: Network Device Naming Test Day
+---
  Reporter:  shyamiyerdell  |   Owner:  narendr...@dell.com
  Type:  defect |  Status:  new
  Priority:  major  |   Milestone:  Fedora 15  
 Component:  Test Day   | Version: 
Resolution: |Keywords: 
+---
Comment (by narendrak):

 James,

 Just one thing to note though. I have referred to the Run Time test
 cases in Install Time test case. We might have to make necessary changes
 there too.

-- 
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/159#comment:12
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality Assurance
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


pulseaudio eats almost 100% of cpu resources during hdd i/o stress by other program (Re: audio skipping/pure sound quality)

2011-01-18 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi,

2011/1/18 Richard Ryniker ryni...@alum.mit.edu:
 I have experienced effects like those you described when Pulseaudio (or
 perhaps something else in the audio-processing chain) must do sample-rate
 conversion, such as from 44.1 KHz to 48KHz, to drive my USB speakers.

 Sox has been an effective solution for me.  Try play (a link to sox that
 denotes output to sound hardware instead of a file) to learn whether sox
 may offer superior sample-rate conversion that avoids the problems you
 hear.

 There are probably a handful of tools that will display information
 about sound devices.  Audacity has a convenient one:

    Help - Audio Device Info

 that displays supported sample rates.  For example, I see:

    Default capture device number: 13
    Default playback device number: 13
    ==
    Device ID: 0
    Device name: ALSA: Bose USB Audio: USB Audio (hw:0,0)
    Input channels: 0
    Output channels: 6
    Low Input Latency: -1.00
    Low Output Latency: 0.010667
    High Input Latency: -1.00
    High Output Latency: 0.042667
    Supported Rates:
        48000
    ==

Hmmm...
==
Device ID: 1
Device name: ALSA: SB Audigy 2 NX: USB Audio (hw:1,0)
Input channels: 2
Output channels: 0
Low Input Latency: 0,010667
Low Output Latency: -1,00
High Input Latency: 0,042667
High Output Latency: -1,00
Supported Rates:
==

What an interesting coincidence with high/low i/o latency numbers :)

Apparently my card doesn't support rates, but there is a

==
Device ID: 4
Device name: ALSA: surround51
Input channels: 0
Output channels: 2
Low Input Latency: -1,00
Low Output Latency: 0,011610
High Input Latency: -1,00
High Output Latency: 0,046440
Supported Rates:
8000
11025
16000
22050
32000
44100
48000
==

I think that problem is somehow related to disk i/o in my case.

I'm doing yum upgrade on one console and on second console I did
dd if=/dev/zero of=plik.dat bs=128M count=32
and pulse audio eats almost 100% of cpu resources
 1308 michal20   0  669m  54m  36m S 99.9  2.7   5:36.03 pulseaudio

I use amarok for playing music - I'm not sure if it has any relevance.

Tomorrow I can take some time to try trace what is the source of this
behavior. All suggestions would be appreciated



 Output like this may display a needed sample rate for your USB sound
 device (48000 in my case).  If you use sox to convert a file to the
 target rate before you play it, and it then sounds good, this confirms
 the problem involves resampling.
 --
 test mailing list
 test@lists.fedoraproject.org
 To unsubscribe:
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test




-- 
Best regards,
Michal

http://eventhorizon.pl/
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


Fedora 13 updates-testing report

2011-01-18 Thread updates
The following Fedora 13 Security updates need testing:

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dbus-1.2.24-2.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/subversion-1.6.15-1.fc13

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-5.3.5-1.fc13,maniadrive-1.2-26.fc13.1,php-eaccelerator-0.9.6.1-4.fc13,maniadrive-data-1.2-5.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Convert-UUlib-1.34-1.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libuser-0.56.16-1.fc13.2
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wordpress-2.8.6-4.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wordpress-mu-2.9.2-3.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dpkg-1.15.5.6-6.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sssd-1.3.0-40.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/feh-1.10.1-1.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mod_auth_mysql-3.0.0-12.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/chm2pdf-0.9.1-8.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wireshark-1.2.14-1.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sudo-1.7.4p5-1.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/hplip-3.10.9-14.fc13

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-48.1.8.4.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/myproxy-5.3-1.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-CGI-Simple-1.112-2.fc13


The following Fedora 13 Critical Path updates have yet to be approved:

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/procps-3.2.8-8.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sudo-1.7.4p5-1.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/elfutils-0.151-1.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/util-linux-ng-2.17.2-10.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libuser-0.56.16-1.fc13.2
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dosfstools-3.0.9-3.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/attr-2.4.44-4.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/livecd-tools-13.1-1.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/selinux-policy-3.7.19-80.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libical-0.46-2.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pm-utils-1.2.6.1-4.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mash-0.5.20-1.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openldap-2.4.21-11.fc13

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nss-3.12.7-4.fc13,nss-util-3.12.7-2.fc13,nss-softokn-3.12.7-3.fc13,nspr-4.8.6-1.fc13

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xorg-x11-drv-openchrome-0.2.904-7.fc13


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora 13 updates-testing

automaton-1.11r5-1.fc13
dokuwiki-0-0.6.20101107.a.fc13
filezilla-3.3.5.1-2.fc13
fpm2-0.79-1.fc13
google-lato-fonts-1.011-1.fc13
hplip-3.10.9-14.fc13
ibus-table-chinese-1.3.0.20110114-1.fc13
java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-48.1.8.4.fc13
jd-2.8.0-0.3.beta110118.fc13
mpop-1.0.22-1.fc13
myproxy-5.3-1.fc13
netpbm-10.47.25-1.fc13
netxen-firmware-4.0.534-3.fc13
printoxx-2.8.1-1.fc13
procps-3.2.8-8.fc13
system-config-printer-1.2.6-2.fc13
topgit-0.9-0.3.gitd279e292.fc13

Details about builds:



 automaton-1.11r5-1.fc13 (FEDORA-2011-0539)
 A Java finite state automata/regular expression library

Update Information:

This update fixes a bug in Gibson's AutomatonMatcher.

ChangeLog:

* Mon Jan 17 2011 Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com - 1.11r5-1
- Upgrade to 1.11-5
- BR openjdk to get better javadoc generation




 dokuwiki-0-0.6.20101107.a.fc13 (FEDORA-2011-0517)
 Standards compliant simple to use wiki

Update Information:

Upgraded to latest upstream 2010-11-07a

ChangeLog:

* Mon Jan 17 2011 Andrew Colin Kissa and...@topdog.za.net - 0-0.6.20101107.a
- Fix selinux sub package
* Mon Jan 17 2011 Andrew Colin Kissa and...@topdog.za.net - 0-0.5.20101107.a
- Upgrade to latest upstream
- Split package to create selinux package
- Fix Bugzilla bug #668386

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #668386 - SELinux prevents Dokuwiki from writing its own config 
files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668386




 filezilla-3.3.5.1-2.fc13 (FEDORA-2011-0497)
 FTP, FTPS and SFTP client

Re: [Fedora QA] #154: Tracker: critical path test case creation

2011-01-18 Thread Fedora QA
#154: Tracker: critical path test case creation
--+-
  Reporter:  adamwill |   Owner:  adamwill 
  Type:  enhancement  |  Status:  new  
  Priority:  major|   Milestone:  Fedora 15
 Component:  Wiki | Version:   
Resolution:   |Keywords:   
--+-
Comment (by jlaska):

 I posted a python script ([http://jlaska.fedorapeople.org/multi-cat-
 search.py multi-cat-search.py]) that can be used to demonstrate using the
 mediawiki API to find tests that apply for a particular source rpm name.
 See the --help for the command, it offers several options, including
 ''-c|--critpath'' to limit results to only critical path tests.

 I'm happy to adjust the script as needed by f-e-k or bodhi.  This was just
 a proof-of-concept to demonstrate sifting through wiki using the API and
 user-input.

-- 
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/154#comment:39
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality Assurance
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


Re: [Fedora QA] #159: Network Device Naming Test Day

2011-01-18 Thread Fedora QA
#159: Network Device Naming Test Day
+---
  Reporter:  shyamiyerdell  |   Owner:  narendr...@dell.com
  Type:  defect |  Status:  new
  Priority:  major  |   Milestone:  Fedora 15  
 Component:  Test Day   | Version: 
Resolution: |Keywords: 
+---
Comment (by narendrak):

 James,

 I have two images attached two pictures, which I think would help users to
 identify/understand what we mean when we refer to the jargon 'onboard' and
 Add-in PCI ports. Looks like I need to have these images on
 fedoraproject.org before they can be embedded into the wiki page. Request
 you to put these two images on to the What to Test Section.

-- 
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/159#comment:13
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality Assurance
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test