Re: pulseaudio eats almost 100% of cpu resources during hdd i/o stress by other program (Re: audio skipping/pure sound quality)

2011-01-19 Thread cornel panceac
 Tomorrow I can take some time to try trace what is the source of this
 behavior. All suggestions would be appreciated


i've once asked a (top) linux developer for assistance on some issues with
sound and mc, and generally anything involving i/o and scheduler, in my
opinion. he told me to look at /proc/sys/kernel/sched_* for some tweakable
numbers. but in his opinion, the problem is the i/o.

about i/o issues, there's a thread saying that:



Now I think the main problem is having the filesystem block (and do IO) in
inode reclaim.  The problem is that this doesn't get accounted well and
penalizes a random allocator with a big latency spike caused by work
generated from elsewhere.

I think the best idea would be to avoid this.  By design if possible, or
by deferring the hard work to an asynchronous context.  If the latter,
then the fs would probably want to throttle creation of new work with
queue size of the deferred work, but let's not get into those details.

Anyway, the other obvious thing we looked at is the iprune_mutex which is
causing the cascading blocking.  We could turn this into an rwsem to
improve concurrency.  It is unreasonable to totally ban all potentially
slow or blocking operations in inode reclaim, so I think this is a cheap
way to get a small improvement.

This doesn't solve the whole problem of course.  The process doing inode
reclaim will still take the latency hit, and concurrent processes may end
up contending on filesystem locks.  So fs developers should keep these
problems in mind.


http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/testing/v2.6.32/ChangeLog-2.6.32-rc1

as much as i understand those things, the bigger the filesystem, the bigger
the i/o slowdown. and if if you are lucky as i am to have one of those
infamous green western digital hard disks on a low end motherboard, the
system can crawl very easily. hope this will help, somehow :)
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

rawhide install attempts fail - missing /usr/bin/hal-lock

2011-01-19 Thread Gregory Woodbury
Trying to install from the nightly compose desktop spin:
1) direct booting fails as gdm goes into a paroxysm of fail/restart and just
flashes the screen.
2) booting into mode 3 and doing a startx brings up a useable desktop
3) /usr/bin/liveinst fails with an error report of missing /usr/bin/hal-lock

giving up for the night.

-- 
G.Wolfe Woodbury
redwolfe(proventesters)
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: rawhide install attempts fail - missing /usr/bin/hal-lock

2011-01-19 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 04:03 -0500, Gregory Woodbury wrote:
 Trying to install from the nightly compose desktop spin:
 1) direct booting fails as gdm goes into a paroxysm of fail/restart
 and just flashes the screen.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670361

 3) /usr/bin/liveinst fails with an error report of
 missing /usr/bin/hal-lock

Oooh, bad anaconda, depending on hal. No cookie for you. Fileabug!
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


Re: rawhide install attempts fail - missing /usr/bin/hal-lock

2011-01-19 Thread Christoph Frieben
2011/1/19 Gregory Woodbury:
 3) /usr/bin/liveinst fails with an error report of missing /usr/bin/hal-lock

Run 'yum install /usr/bin/hal-lock'. You will be prompted to install
the corresponding package, and liveinst then allows to install the
system successfully. ~C
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


Re: Compiz 0.9 landing in Rawhide

2011-01-19 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 14:20 +, Adam Williamson wrote:
 So all the gconf schemas are now in -gconf subpackages which you don't
 have to install unless you really, really want to use the gconf
 configuration storage system for some reason. If you do, you'll have
 to
 make sure whatever method you use for launching compiz sets the
 'gconf'
 parameter instead of 'ccp'. The compiz-gtk script which most people
 probably wind up using, one way or another, to launch compiz now
 specifies 'ccp' not 'gconf'. I have tested the 'ccp' configuration
 method quite carefully and can report that, contrary to how it's been
 in
 Fedora for a while, Compiz configuration you set with ccsm actually
 works now. :) 

Except it means that you're losing all the keyboard configuration that
used to be done in the GNOME Keyboard shortcuts preferences.

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


Re: Compiz 0.9 landing in Rawhide

2011-01-19 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 12:03 +, Adam Williamson wrote:

 configure compiz!' was one of the most popular bug reports (see
 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532229 ). I can't really
 think of a really good way to set this up, especially given that the
 compiz user base seems split fairly cleanly between GNOME/compiz and
 (other-desktop)/compiz users, I don't think there's a clear majority for
 either. then there's the deprecation of GConf and the lack of any
 guarantee that compiz is going to get a gsettings port looming over
 everything. do you have any thoughts?

bootnote - it does seem in the early discussion in that bug that Owen
and Adel came to a reasonable consensus that it made sense to just drop
the efforts at GNOME configuration integration and say 'configure compiz
via ccsm, don't expect GNOME settings to apply'.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


Re: [Fedora QA] #159: Network Device Naming Test Day

2011-01-19 Thread Fedora QA
#159: Network Device Naming Test Day
+---
  Reporter:  shyamiyerdell  |   Owner:  narendr...@dell.com
  Type:  defect |  Status:  new
  Priority:  major  |   Milestone:  Fedora 15  
 Component:  Test Day   | Version: 
Resolution: |Keywords: 
+---
Comment (by narendrak):

 Thanks Adam, i will explore it.

 I booted into the Rawhide Live Image -
 http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/nightly-
 composes/desktop/desktop-x86_64-20110117.16.iso. It failed to show the
 desktop after doing an autologin. The desktop screen flickers continuously
 without completing autologin.

 But i could switch to the text terminal and could see biosdevname, system-
 config-network-tui and ethtool available.

-- 
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/159#comment:15
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality Assurance
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


Re: Compiz 0.9 landing in Rawhide

2011-01-19 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 12:03 +, Adam Williamson wrote:

 for now I'm going to at least see if I can get a 'pure-gconf' setup to
 work with ccsm.

well, I think I have this going now. the question now is whether to
force gconf on all compiz users...I think I'll update the bug report
with the issues to consider.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


Re: rawhide install attempts fail - missing /usr/bin/hal-lock

2011-01-19 Thread James Laska
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 10:34 +, Adam Williamson wrote:
  3) /usr/bin/liveinst fails with an error report of
  missing /usr/bin/hal-lock
 
 Oooh, bad anaconda, depending on hal. No cookie for you. Fileabug! 

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670312

Thanks,
James


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: rawhide install attempts fail - missing /usr/bin/hal-lock

2011-01-19 Thread Chris Lumens
  3) /usr/bin/liveinst fails with an error report of
  missing /usr/bin/hal-lock
 
 Oooh, bad anaconda, depending on hal. No cookie for you. Fileabug!

What would be even more useful would be suggesting what we should be
doing to replace the usage of /usr/bin/hal-lock.

- Chris
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


Re: rawhide install attempts fail - missing /usr/bin/hal-lock

2011-01-19 Thread Gregory Woodbury
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 6:17 AM, Christoph Frieben 
christoph.frie...@googlemail.com wrote:

 2011/1/19 Gregory Woodbury:
  3) /usr/bin/liveinst fails with an error report of missing
 /usr/bin/hal-lock

 Run 'yum install /usr/bin/hal-lock'. You will be prompted to install
 the corresponding package, and liveinst then allows to install the
 system successfully. ~C


That does indeed let the system install successfully.

1) Firstboot does not get run properly after reeboot
2) gdm still goes into paralasis of fail/restart so one can't log in
graphically
3) login on a text console works and using mode3 and startx brings up a
useable desktop

4) NFS is not part of the default system (personal nitpick)
5) vim is not on the default system (personal preference)

-- 
G.Wolfe Woodbury
redwolfe(proventesters)
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: rawhide install attempts fail - missing /usr/bin/hal-lock

2011-01-19 Thread Gregory Woodbury
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Gregory Woodbury redwo...@gmail.comwrote:



 On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 6:17 AM, Christoph Frieben 
 christoph.frie...@googlemail.com wrote:

 2011/1/19 Gregory Woodbury:
  3) /usr/bin/liveinst fails with an error report of missing
 /usr/bin/hal-lock

 Run 'yum install /usr/bin/hal-lock'. You will be prompted to install
 the corresponding package, and liveinst then allows to install the
 system successfully. ~C


 That does indeed let the system install successfully.

 1) Firstboot does not get run properly after reeboot
 2) gdm still goes into paralasis of fail/restart so one can't log in
 graphically
 3) login on a text console works and using mode3 and startx brings up a
 useable desktop


Additionally, plymouthd throws an error durring bootup: cannot log bootup,
address already in use.

-- 
G.Wolfe Woodbury
redwolfe(proventesters)
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: rawhide install attempts fail - missing /usr/bin/hal-lock

2011-01-19 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 10:02 -0500, Chris Lumens wrote:
   3) /usr/bin/liveinst fails with an error report of
   missing /usr/bin/hal-lock
  
  Oooh, bad anaconda, depending on hal. No cookie for you. Fileabug!
 
 What would be even more useful would be suggesting what we should be
 doing to replace the usage of /usr/bin/hal-lock.

The replacement for hal-lock is udisks --inhibit. See udisks(1).

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


Re: pulseaudio eats almost 100% of cpu resources during hdd i/o stress by other program (Re: audio skipping/pure sound quality)

2011-01-19 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2011/1/19 cornel panceac cpanc...@gmail.com:

 Tomorrow I can take some time to try trace what is the source of this
 behavior. All suggestions would be appreciated

 i've once asked a (top) linux developer for assistance on some issues with
 sound and mc, and generally anything involving i/o and scheduler, in my
 opinion. he told me to look at /proc/sys/kernel/sched_* for some tweakable
 numbers. but in his opinion, the problem is the i/o.

 about i/o issues, there's a thread saying that:

 

 Now I think the main problem is having the filesystem block (and do IO) in
 inode reclaim.  The problem is that this doesn't get accounted well and

 penalizes a random allocator with a big latency spike caused by work
 generated from elsewhere.

 I think the best idea would be to avoid this.  By design if possible, or
 by deferring the hard work to an asynchronous context.  If the latter,

 then the fs would probably want to throttle creation of new work with
 queue size of the deferred work, but let's not get into those details.

 Anyway, the other obvious thing we looked at is the iprune_mutex which is

 causing the cascading blocking.  We could turn this into an rwsem to
 improve concurrency.  It is unreasonable to totally ban all potentially
 slow or blocking operations in inode reclaim, so I think this is a cheap

 way to get a small improvement.

 This doesn't solve the whole problem of course.  The process doing inode
 reclaim will still take the latency hit, and concurrent processes may end
 up contending on filesystem locks.  So fs developers should keep these

 problems in mind.

 
 http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/testing/v2.6.32/ChangeLog-2.6.32-rc1

And where the famous 2.6.37 vfs scalability fixes? :)


 as much as i understand those things, the bigger the filesystem,

My /home on laptop has 8 or 16GB (it's only a test system) - I've got
larger file systems

 the bigger
 the i/o slowdown. and if if you are lucky as i am to have one of those
 infamous green western digital hard disks

I'm lucky and I've got two infamous

[1.585384] ata3.00: ATA-8: WDC WD10EADS-00L5B1, 01.01A01, max UDMA/133
[..]
[1.602188] ata4.00: ATA-8: WDC WD15EADS-00P8B0, 01.00A01, max UDMA/133

I also have one famous

[2.907613] ata6.00: ATA-8: WDC WD1001FALS-00E8B0, 05.00K05, max UDMA/133

 on a low end motherboard,

on atom 330 board. No problems so far :)

 the
 system can crawl very easily. hope this will help, somehow :)


Thanks for the pointer.

I doubt that this problem is related to kernel space issue. I'll try
to track down it this week.

-- 
Best regards,
Michal

http://eventhorizon.pl/
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


Re: Medium-sized project for anyone looking for one

2011-01-19 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 23:14 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
  It would also be really nice if smolt could include the numeric pci
  device/vendor ids along with the string, I've had a couple bugs where
  being able to see that information would be very helpful. (Since the
  string can be the same for several versions of a chip as you
  describe.)
 
 I swear it used to, or can be made to.  Though it displays them 
 in decimal, which is extremely disorienting.

now you've said that, it's ringing bells. I think I figured out that it
does show an ID for each device but I didn't twig it was actually the
PCI ID in decimal...how bizarre.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


Re: pulseaudio eats almost 100% of cpu resources during hdd i/o stress by other program (Re: audio skipping/pure sound quality)

2011-01-19 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 01/19/2011 11:14 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:

 And where the famous 2.6.37 vfs scalability fixes? :)

Some were merged in 2.6.36 and the rest will be in 2.6.38 and not 2.6.37

Rahul


-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: pulseaudio eats almost 100% of cpu resources during hdd i/o stress by other program (Re: audio skipping/pure sound quality)

2011-01-19 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2011/1/19 Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com:
 On 01/19/2011 11:14 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:

 And where the famous 2.6.37 vfs scalability fixes? :)

 Some were merged in 2.6.36 and the rest will be in 2.6.38 and not 2.6.37

git log --format=oneline --abbrev-commit v2.6.36..v2.6.37 fs/ | grep  fs:
shows some stuff

the entire list may also reveal some patches
git log --format=oneline --abbrev-commit v2.6.36..v2.6.37 fs/


 Rahul


 --
 test mailing list
 test@lists.fedoraproject.org
 To unsubscribe:
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test



-- 
Best regards,
Michal

http://eventhorizon.pl/
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


Re: [Fedora QA] #159: Network Device Naming Test Day

2011-01-19 Thread Fedora QA
#159: Network Device Naming Test Day
+---
  Reporter:  shyamiyerdell  |   Owner:  narendr...@dell.com
  Type:  defect |  Status:  new
  Priority:  major  |   Milestone:  Fedora 15  
 Component:  Test Day   | Version: 
Resolution: |Keywords: 
+---
Comment (by adamwill):

 are any of the test cases critpath? i.e., if they were to fail, would
 networking fail to work on affected machines?

-- 
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/159#comment:17
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality Assurance
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


Re: [Test-Announce] Call for reviewing TCMS use cases and comparison!

2011-01-19 Thread James Laska
On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 19:36 +0800, He Rui wrote:
 Greetings!
 
 Wiki workflow/use cases are reorganized and grouped by general and main
 test events(runs) use cases. The general cases cover the basic uses of
 wiki, and the events cases covers the detailed certain steps for
 organizing the events.
 
 Please review it:
 
 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Rhe/tcms_use_cases
 
 
 Meanwhile, Wiki and Nitrate comparison is also listed and grouped by
 above use cases. I've listed as many features as I can think out for
 comparison. Please have a look and see if any features are missed. You
 can review it by the use case you're familiar with if reviewing all of
 them is tough, but be aware that features compared in former use cases
 are not listed in later cases again to avoid overlaps:
 
 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Rhe/tcms_Comparison
 
  
 Ticket#152[1] is currently set up for tracking this event. Feel free to
 add comments or discuss it here. 
 
 Note: the feedback deadline is Jan 21, the end of this week. After that
 date, I'll move forward to the next phase. 
 
 Waiting for your feedback!

Woah, I like the fancy table layout used for comparing use cases between
the wiki and nitrate!  Thank you for taking the time to identify our
current test workflows and offer a comparison between nitrate and the
wiki.  You've got a really comprehensive list of use cases that will
certainly help us evaluate nitrate.

While looking through the comparison wiki, I've noted a few
comments/questions below.  Hope this helps!

I'm unclear what the use case 'Creating A Common Page' is, can you
elaborate?  Is that when we create a category page to group all test
results for a milestone (e.g.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Fedora_14_Pre-Alpha_Test_Results)?

Under 'creating a common page', the row titled 'Submitting format'.
Would that be better named as 'Supports data entry using a form'?

Under 'creating a common page', there is a row titled 'Subpage using'.
I don't think I understand that use case, can you explain?

Under section 'Creating A Test Case', there are some red cells for the
wiki for (these are also under 'Creating a Test Plan').  What does the
'red' mean.  Does it mean that they are not possible, or that the
solution provided is not optimal?
  * Renaming a case - move to another page
  * Case draft status - manually add draft category/note
  * Case review status - approved in ticket or somewhere else

Also under section 'Creating A Test Case', the row titled 'Test case
re-use (write once, link anywhere)' talks about nitrate support for
cloning tests.  Does this create a new copy of the original, or does it
re-use the existing test?  If any changes are made to one, are the
propagated to the other clone?

Under 'Creating A Test Result Page Template', the row titled 'Group
cases (by media)', I imagine nitrate supports other methods of
grouping/organizing tests in a test run?  Oh wait ... this is grouping,
not sorting.  How would this be done with nitrate, would a test run be
created for each media type?  Or would we sort tests of different media
types differently?

Under 'Creating A Test Result Page', the row titled 'Redirecting
links' ... is this when a test run has expired, or been replaced by a
newer test run?  Like if we get RC2, we'll go and adjust RC1 so people
know it's no longer active?  Not sure what to call this feature, retire
a test run?

Under 'Posting Test Results', the row titled 'Opening current links' ...
I'm trying to think of a more generic name for that feature.  Maybe
'Quick access to active test runs' instead?

Under 'Generating A Test Summary', the row titled 'Result summary/report
generation'.  Haha, you list that as *RED* ... very accurate! :)

Under 'Administering', the row titled 'License', is this the license for
nitrate and mediawiki, or the license for the content in the cases,
plans and results?

Under 'Release Validation Test Event', the row titled 'Roadmap for each
run' ... can you explain, or link to, what is meant by this?

Thanks again!
James


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Fedora 13 updates-testing report

2011-01-19 Thread updates
The following Fedora 13 Security updates need testing:

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dbus-1.2.24-2.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/subversion-1.6.15-1.fc13

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-5.3.5-1.fc13,maniadrive-1.2-26.fc13.1,php-eaccelerator-0.9.6.1-4.fc13,maniadrive-data-1.2-5.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libuser-0.56.16-1.fc13.2
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wordpress-mu-2.9.2-3.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dpkg-1.15.5.6-6.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sssd-1.3.0-40.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/feh-1.10.1-1.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mod_auth_mysql-3.0.0-12.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/chm2pdf-0.9.1-8.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wireshark-1.2.14-1.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sudo-1.7.4p5-1.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/hplip-3.10.9-14.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/myproxy-5.3-1.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-CGI-Simple-1.112-2.fc13


The following Fedora 13 Critical Path updates have yet to be approved:

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/procps-3.2.8-8.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sudo-1.7.4p5-1.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/elfutils-0.151-1.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/util-linux-ng-2.17.2-10.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libuser-0.56.16-1.fc13.2
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/attr-2.4.44-4.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/livecd-tools-13.1-1.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/selinux-policy-3.7.19-80.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libical-0.46-2.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pm-utils-1.2.6.1-4.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mash-0.5.20-1.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openldap-2.4.21-11.fc13

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nss-3.12.7-4.fc13,nss-util-3.12.7-2.fc13,nss-softokn-3.12.7-3.fc13,nspr-4.8.6-1.fc13

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xorg-x11-drv-openchrome-0.2.904-7.fc13


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora 13 updates-testing

dfu-programmer-0.5.4-1.fc13
ghc-enumerator-0.4.3.1-1.fc13.1
ghc-text-0.10.0.0-1.fc13
html-xml-utils-5.8-1.fc13
libssh-0.4.8-1.fc13
memtest86+-4.10-3.fc13
mock-1.1.8-1.fc13
mysql-connector-java-5.1.14-1.fc13
perl-Bencode-1.4-1.fc13
perl-Convert-Bencode-1.03-1.fc13
perl-Convert-Bencode_XS-0.06-1.fc13
pokerth-0.8.3-1.fc13
pootle-2.1.5-1.fc13
qbittorrent-2.6.3-1.fc13
rubygem-boxgrinder-build-ebs-delivery-plugin-0.0.4-1.fc13
rubygem-boxgrinder-build-s3-delivery-plugin-0.0.5-2.fc13
simulavr-0.1.2.6-8.fc13
wordpress-plugin-defaults-2.1-1.fc13
zabbix-1.8.4-2.fc13

Details about builds:



 dfu-programmer-0.5.4-1.fc13 (FEDORA-2011-0580)
 A Device Firmware Update based USB programmer for Atmel chips

ChangeLog:

* Sun Jan 16 2011 Weston Schmidt weston_schmidt at alumni.purdue.edu - 0.5.4-1
- added atmega8u2 support
* Sun Jan 16 2011 Weston Schmidt weston_schmidt at alumni.purdue.edu - 0.5.3-1
- added at32uc3c* support
- fixed a number of defects
* Sat Aug 22 2009 Weston Schmidt weston_schmidt at alumni.purdue.edu - 0.5.2-1
- added ability to read from STDIN
- added ability to configure AVR32 fuses
- Applied a number of bug fixes
- Fixed AVR device support




 ghc-enumerator-0.4.3.1-1.fc13.1 (FEDORA-2011-0459)
 Implementation of Oleg Kiselyov's left-fold enumerators

Update Information:

Update to the Haskell text library to 0.10.0.0.

ChangeLog:

* Tue Dec 21 2010 Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com - 0.4.3.1-1.1
- Rebuild against ghc-text




 ghc-text-0.10.0.0-1.fc13 (FEDORA-2011-0459)
 Haskell text library

Update Information:

Update to the Haskell text library to 0.10.0.0.

ChangeLog:

* Mon Nov  1 2010 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com - 0.10.0.0-1
- update to 0.10.0.0
- README renamed to README.markdown




Re: [Fedora QA] #159: Network Device Naming Test Day

2011-01-19 Thread Fedora QA
#159: Network Device Naming Test Day
+---
  Reporter:  shyamiyerdell  |   Owner:  narendr...@dell.com
  Type:  defect |  Status:  new
  Priority:  major  |   Milestone:  Fedora 15  
 Component:  Test Day   | Version: 
Resolution: |Keywords: 
+---
Comment (by adamwill):

 It failed to show the desktop after doing an autologin. The desktop
 screen flickers continuously without completing autologin. 

 gdm is crashing in a loop -
 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670361

 I hope that'll get fixed by the test day date :)

-- 
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/159#comment:18
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality Assurance
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


Gnome 3.0

2011-01-19 Thread Rob Healey
Greetings:

Does anyone know if there is a verbose schedule for the development of Gnome
3.0?

I LOVE the gnome-shell, and I would like to see when things are planned in
the development schedule?

If there is no published schedule, is there someone that I could email?

Sincerely,
Rob G. Healey
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

F14 and Gigabyte GA-EP45-UD3P install problem

2011-01-19 Thread Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R
Tried to install 64 bit F14 on a system with six SATA HDs.
Installation proceeded normally but booting abended
with the grub rescue prompt.

To get a working install, I had to use Mythubuntu
as the primary system, then install F14 specifying
the boot partition for Grub, finally running grub-mkconfig
under Ubuntu to make a bootable entry for Fedora.

-- 
Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R c...@omen.com   www.omen.com
Developer of Industrial ZMODEM(Tm) for Embedded Applications
   Omen Technology Inc  The High Reliability Software
10255 NW Old Cornelius Pass Portland OR 97231   503-614-0430

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


Re: [Test-Announce] Call for reviewing TCMS use cases and comparison!

2011-01-19 Thread He Rui
Please ignore the last mail.

Hi James,

Wow, firstly, many thanks for your careful review of all the items.:)

On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 16:08 -0500, James Laska wrote:
 On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 19:36 +0800, He Rui wrote:
  Greetings!
  
  Wiki workflow/use cases are reorganized and grouped by general and main
  test events(runs) use cases. The general cases cover the basic uses of
  wiki, and the events cases covers the detailed certain steps for
  organizing the events.
  
  Please review it:
  
  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Rhe/tcms_use_cases
  
  
  Meanwhile, Wiki and Nitrate comparison is also listed and grouped by
  above use cases. I've listed as many features as I can think out for
  comparison. Please have a look and see if any features are missed. You
  can review it by the use case you're familiar with if reviewing all of
  them is tough, but be aware that features compared in former use cases
  are not listed in later cases again to avoid overlaps:
  
  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Rhe/tcms_Comparison
  
   
  Ticket#152[1] is currently set up for tracking this event. Feel free to
  add comments or discuss it here. 
  
  Note: the feedback deadline is Jan 21, the end of this week. After that
  date, I'll move forward to the next phase. 
  
  Waiting for your feedback!
 
 Woah, I like the fancy table layout used for comparing use cases between
 the wiki and nitrate!  Thank you for taking the time to identify our
 current test workflows and offer a comparison between nitrate and the
 wiki.  You've got a really comprehensive list of use cases that will
 certainly help us evaluate nitrate.
 
 While looking through the comparison wiki, I've noted a few
 comments/questions below.  Hope this helps!
 
 I'm unclear what the use case 'Creating A Common Page' is, can you
 elaborate?  Is that when we create a category page to group all test
 results for a milestone (e.g.
 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Fedora_14_Pre-Alpha_Test_Results)?

No, it means creating a general new page on wiki, like a documentation
page etc, and test cases/plans/categories/results pages are particular
cases based on creating a normal page like this. It lists what a user
may do when creating a new page. 

 Under 'creating a common page', the row titled 'Submitting format'.
 Would that be better named as 'Supports data entry using a form'?

Ah great, I've changed it.
 
 Under 'creating a common page', there is a row titled 'Subpage using'.
 I don't think I understand that use case, can you explain?

Okay, for example on wiki, Test_Days is under the path of QA like:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Test_Days

So I tried to compare if nitrate can also organize sub-page under its
main page. 

 Under section 'Creating A Test Case', there are some red cells for the
 wiki for (these are also under 'Creating a Test Plan').  What does the
 'red' mean.  Does it mean that they are not possible, or that the
 solution provided is not optimal?

Oh the first two below are not optimal, the last one is not possible on
wiki. 

   * Renaming a case - move to another page

I think moving to another page is not a good way to rename a case, there
will be two link addresses for this case.   

   * Case draft status - manually add draft category/note

It's better to have a case status called draft, or proposed like nitrate
does.

   * Case review status - approved in ticket or somewhere else

Nitrate will send an email including the proposed case id to reviewer
for approval. Then the reviewer can set 'confirmed', or 'need update'
status. For wiki, I remember we used to track the cases status in
tickets and after approved in tickets or reviewed in test@, the 'draft'
note is removed, but no sign indicates the case has been reviewed and
approved.

 Also under section 'Creating A Test Case', the row titled 'Test case
 re-use (write once, link anywhere)' talks about nitrate support for
 cloning tests.  Does this create a new copy of the original, or does it
 re-use the existing test?  If any changes are made to one, are the
 propagated to the other clone?

Nitrate creates new copies, so if any change is made to one, the other
clone won't change.

 
 Under 'Creating A Test Result Page Template', the row titled 'Group
 cases (by media)', I imagine nitrate supports other methods of
 grouping/organizing tests in a test run?  Oh wait ... this is grouping,
 not sorting.  How would this be done with nitrate, would a test run be
 created for each media type?  Or would we sort tests of different media
 types differently?


AFAIK, except the above two methods, adding tags to tests and filtering
them by tags is another choice. But it requires testers to filter by
themselves. So.. I need think about them and compare these methods.

 Under 'Creating A Test Result Page', the row titled 'Redirecting
 links' ... is this when a test run has expired, or been replaced by a
 newer test run?  Like if we get RC2, we'll go and adjust RC1 so people
 know 

Fedora 14 and HDMI audio - silence.

2011-01-19 Thread Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R
Not too long ago I upgraded my home theater system
with a blu-ray player.  This no longer worked with the HDMI
on my old receiver, so I upgraded that too.  I upgraded
the video card on my stereo computer to an Nvidia 220
with HDMI output.  With this combination I am able to
watch NASA HD in Dolby Digital.  No analog connections.
No ground loop noise!   VLC player can pass the Dolby Digital
or DTS signal to the receiver for full surround sound.

Fedora 14 (updated) with the current Nvidia driver is
reported to support HDMI audio output.  By installing
the XFCE mixer I am able to activate iec958 1 which
outputs an audio bit stream over the HDMI connector.

Unfortunately, selecting HDMI audio under Sound Preferences
does not break the silence.

The receiver does not have the option of taking video from
the HDMI output with analog audio.  No tape monitor.
No external processor loop.

This problem will become more widespread as HDMI
output becomes the norm, not the exception.

Is there a reasonably simple way to get Fedora to speak over the
display adapter's HDMI output?

-- 
Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R c...@omen.com   www.omen.com
Developer of Industrial ZMODEM(Tm) for Embedded Applications
   Omen Technology Inc  The High Reliability Software
10255 NW Old Cornelius Pass Portland OR 97231   503-614-0430

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


Re: Gnome 3.0

2011-01-19 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 01/20/2011 09:38 AM, Rob Healey wrote:
 Greetings:

 Does anyone know if there is a verbose schedule for the development of
 Gnome 3.0?

 I LOVE the gnome-shell, and I would like to see when things are
 planned in the development schedule?

 If there is no published schedule, is there someone that I could email?

A few minutes of googling would have easily found the answers

http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointNinetyone

http://live.gnome.org/GnomeShell/RoadmapTwoThirtyOne

Rahul

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


Re: pulseaudio eats almost 100% of cpu resources during hdd i/o stress by other program (Re: audio skipping/pure sound quality)

2011-01-19 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 01/20/2011 01:05 AM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
 2011/1/19 Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com:
 On 01/19/2011 11:14 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
 And where the famous 2.6.37 vfs scalability fixes? :)
 Some were merged in 2.6.36 and the rest will be in 2.6.38 and not 2.6.37
 git log --format=oneline --abbrev-commit v2.6.36..v2.6.37 fs/ | grep  fs:
 shows some stuff

 the entire list may also reveal some patches
 git log --format=oneline --abbrev-commit v2.6.36..v2.6.37 fs/

The main improvement,  RCU based name lookup is in 2.6.38 rc1.  I
assumed you were talking about that instead of minor fixes.

Rahul
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


Re: F14 and Gigabyte GA-EP45-UD3P install problem

2011-01-19 Thread cornel panceac
2011/1/20 Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R c...@omen.com

 Tried to install 64 bit F14 on a system with six SATA HDs.
 Installation proceeded normally but booting abended
 with the grub rescue prompt.

 To get a working install, I had to use Mythubuntu
 as the primary system, then install F14 specifying
 the boot partition for Grub, finally running grub-mkconfig
 under Ubuntu to make a bootable entry for Fedora.

 you can try to fix grub issues using fedora rescue mode from install dvd.


-- 
Through political strategy they keep us hungry and, when you gonna get some
food, your brother got to be your enemy.
(Ambush in the Night - Robert Nesta Marley)
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test