Re: [Fedora QA] #173: Obsoleting the tests for verifying http/nfs/ftp/hard disk install sources

[Fedora QA]

#173: Obsoleting the tests for verifying http/nfs/ftp/hard disk install sources
--+-
  Reporter:  rhe  |   Owner:  rhe  
  Type:  enhancement  |  Status:  new  
  Priority:  major|   Milestone:  Fedora 15
 Component:  Wiki | Version:   
Resolution:   |Keywords:   
--+-
Comment (by rhe):

 Replying to [comment:1 jlaska]:
 > Thanks for raising this topic!  We'll need to confirm with clumens of
 course, but I don't know if there are plans to add graphical repository
 configuration for NFS ISO, HD and HD ISO installation methods.  I don't
 believe there are plans to remove loader handling for package repository
 access methods.  Which means, Fedora will still support traditional
 installation methods available by way of ''askmethod''.
 Ok, if it's still supported, there should be tests covering it.

 > Perhaps we need to rename/rethink these different tests?

 Yeah, and your grouping idea reminds me a way to do it: Combine current
 [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Installation_Source Install
 source](except install source on Media tests) and
 [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Repository Package repository]
 together, naming it as 'Installation repository'. In this category, cases
 are sub-categoried by http, NFS, NFSISO and CD/DVD. How does this sound?

 > The two functions that need verification are ...
 >  1. the loader handling/setup of a given installation repository.  I'm
 thinking these are the operations that dictate how the 'Installation repo'
 is setup.  For some boot methods, this is handled for us (e.g. DVD creates
 a CDROM repo, boot.iso and pxeboot don't add any 'installation repo')
 >  2. the graphical repository dialog allowing for additional repos, repo
 removal, and existing repo edits.  These are mostly manual (except for
 kickstart) functions.
 >
 > As for loader handling/setup of a given installation repository, we have
 the following scenarios (most of which are already tests, but perhaps need
 adjustment/rename):
 >
 > 1. Installation repository - http
 >  * default scenario
 >   1. Boot and install using a netinst.iso or pxeboot images

 Current test is:
 [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/TestCases/InstallSourceBootIso
 InstallSourceBootIso] (using default retrieved mirror repo)

 >  * variation(s):
 >   1. Boot with: 'askmethod' and manually input HTTP repo
 Current test is:
 [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/TestCases/InstallSourceHttp
 InstallSourceHttp], need rename it and modify the content about 'install
 source' part.
 >   2. Boot with: repo=http://server/path/to/repo
 Current test is:
 [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Http_Repository
 QA:Testcase_Http_Repository]
 >   3. Use ftp://server/path/to/repo
 >   4. Use ftp://user:pass@server/path/to/repo

 If we include FTP tests in HTTP tests, these two can be included in the
 above two http cases as a choice to test?

 >   5. Configure proxy=[protocol://][username[:password]@]host[:port]
 No test case yet. I think this can be included as an optional step in the
 http repo tests?

 > 2. Installation repository - NFS
 >  * default scenario
 >   1. Use graphical repository dialog to input NFS Server and PATH

 Current test is:
 [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Additional_NFS_Repository
 QA:Testcase_Additional_NFS_Repository]

 >  * variation(s):
 >   1. Boot with: repo=nfs::/
 Current test is:
 [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Nfs_Repository
 QA:Testcase_Nfs_Repository]

 and 2. Boot with 'askmethod'?
 [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/TestCases/InstallSourceNfs
 InstallSourceNfs] is the test to be adjusted.

 > 3. Installation repository - NFS ISO
 >  * default scenario
 >   1. Boot with 'askmethod' and manually enter NFS ISO server + path
 Current test to be adjusted:
 [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/TestCases/InstallSourceNfsIso
 InstallSourceNfsIso]

 >  * variation(s):
 >   1. Boot with: repo=nfsiso[:options]::/
 No test case covering it yet. Need to create it.

 > 4. Install repository - HD ISO
 >  * default scenario
 >   1. Boot with 'askmethod' and manually enter HD device and path

 [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/TestCases/InstallSourceHardDrive
 InstallSourceHardDrive]
 >  * variations:
 >   1. repo=hd::/
 >   2. repo=hd:LABEL=:/
 >   3. repo=hd:UUID=:/

 No test case yet. The above three can be combined into one test in my
 opinion.

 > 5. Install repository - CD/DVD ISO
 >  * default scenario
 >   1. Boot and install from a CD or DVD ISO image
 Current test is
 [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/TestCases/InstallSourceDvd
 InstallSourceDvd].
 >  * variations:
 >   1. Boot with 'askmethod' and selects CD-ROM/DVD-ROM
 >   2. Boot with repo=cdrom:

 No test case yet. Do we need cover these two? I don't think they are
 common use cases.
 >
 > If we incl

Fedora 13 updates-testing report

[updates]

The following Fedora 13 Security updates need testing:

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/abcm2ps-5.9.21-1.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dbus-1.2.24-2.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/subversion-1.6.15-1.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ruby-1.8.6.420-2.fc13

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/telepathy-gabble-0.10.5-1.fc13,telepathy-glib-0.11.16-2.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dhcp-4.1.2-2.ESV.R1.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/q-7.11-8.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/feh-1.10.1-1.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openssl-1.0.0d-1.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/patch-2.6.1-8.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/asterisk-1.6.2.16.2-1.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/moodle-1.9.11-1.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/phpMyAdmin-3.3.9.2-1.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mailman-2.1.12-17.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/389-ds-base-1.2.8-0.3.a3.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/389-admin-1.1.15-1.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/TeXmacs-1.0.7.9-2.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-actionpack-2.3.5-4.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tor-0.2.1.29-1300.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kernel-2.6.34.8-68.fc13


The following Fedora 13 Critical Path updates have yet to be approved:

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kernel-2.6.34.8-68.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/NetworkManager-0.8.3.995-1.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/livecd-tools-13.2-1.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lua-5.1.4-7.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/librsvg2-2.26.3-3.fc13

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mobile-broadband-provider-info-1.20110218-1.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/less-436-9.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dosfstools-3.0.9-4.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openssl-1.0.0d-1.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/patch-2.6.1-8.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/file-5.04-7.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tzdata-2011b-1.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/system-config-users-1.2.107-1.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-ethtool-0.6-1.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libical-0.46-2.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pm-utils-1.2.6.1-4.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mash-0.5.20-1.fc13

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nss-3.12.7-4.fc13,nss-util-3.12.7-2.fc13,nss-softokn-3.12.7-3.fc13,nspr-4.8.6-1.fc13

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xorg-x11-drv-openchrome-0.2.904-7.fc13


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora 13 updates-testing

389-admin-1.1.15-1.fc13
389-ds-base-1.2.8-0.3.a3.fc13
389-ds-console-1.2.4-1.fc13
NetworkManager-0.8.3.995-1.fc13
TeXmacs-1.0.7.9-2.fc13
cmake-fedora-0.4.999-1.fc13
ejabberd-2.1.6-4.fc13
idm-console-framework-1.1.6-1.fc13
kernel-2.6.34.8-68.fc13
pam_yubico-2.4-1.fc13
perl-IO-Multiplex-1.12-1.fc13
root-5.28.00a-1.fc13
rubygem-actionpack-2.3.5-4.fc13
xneur-0.12.0-3.svn859.fc13

Details about builds:



 389-admin-1.1.15-1.fc13 (FEDORA-2011-2145)
 389 Administration Server (admin)

Update Information:

1.1.15 release - git tag 389-admin-1.1.15
see Bugs for the list of bugs fixed
start-ds-admin.in -- replaced "return 1" with "exit 1"

ChangeLog:

* Wed Feb 23 2011 Rich Megginson  - 1.1.15-1
- 1.1.15 release - git tag 389-admin-1.1.15
- Bug 493424 - remove unneeded modules for admin server apache config
- Bug 618897 - Wrong permissions when creating instance from Console
- Bug 672468 - Don't use empty path elements in LD_LIBRARY_PATH
- Bug 245278 - Changing to a password with a single quote does not work
- Bug 604881 - admin server log files have incorrect permissions/ownerships
- Bug 387981 - plain files can be chosen on the Restore Directory dialog
- Bug 668950 - Add posix group support to Console
- Bug 618858 - move start-ds-admin env file into main admin server config path
- Bug 616260 - libds-admin-serv linking fails due to unresolved link-time depe
ndencies
- start-ds-admin.in -- replaced "return 1" with "exit 1"
- Bug 151705 - Need to update Console Cipher Preferences with new ciphers
- Bug 470576 - Migration could do addition checks before commiting actions

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #672468 - CVE-2011-0532 Directory Server: use of insec

Fedora 14 updates-testing report

[updates]

The following Fedora 14 Security updates need testing:

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/q-7.11-8.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/feh-1.10.1-1.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/socat-1.7.1.3-1.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/patch-2.6.1-8.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/asterisk-1.6.2.16.2-1.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/moodle-1.9.11-1.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/phpMyAdmin-3.3.9.2-1.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/couchdb-1.0.2-1.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mailman-2.1.13-7.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/389-ds-base-1.2.8-0.3.a3.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/389-admin-1.1.15-1.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/TeXmacs-1.0.7.9-2.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-actionpack-2.3.8-3.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tor-0.2.1.29-1400.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/exim-4.72-2.fc14


The following Fedora 14 Critical Path updates have yet to be approved:

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/NetworkManager-0.8.3.995-1.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/deltarpm-3.6-0.6.20110223git.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lua-5.1.4-7.fc14

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mobile-broadband-provider-info-1.20110218-1.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/elfutils-0.152-1.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dosfstools-3.0.9-5.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xorg-x11-drv-geode-2.11.11-4.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openldap-2.4.23-8.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dmidecode-2.11-1.fc14


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora 14 updates-testing

389-admin-1.1.15-1.fc14
389-ds-base-1.2.8-0.3.a3.fc14
389-ds-console-1.2.4-1.fc14
NetworkManager-0.8.3.995-1.fc14
TeXmacs-1.0.7.9-2.fc14
cmake-fedora-0.4.999-1.fc14
eekboard-0.90.2-1.fc14
ejabberd-2.1.6-4.fc14
gdb-7.2-45.fc14
idm-console-framework-1.1.6-1.fc14
kmldonkey-2.0.5-1.fc14
minicom-2.5-3.fc14
pam_yubico-2.4-1.fc14
perl-IO-Multiplex-1.12-1.fc14
root-5.28.00a-1.fc14
rubygem-actionpack-2.3.8-3.fc14
valgrind-3.5.0-20.fc14
xneur-0.12.0-3.svn859.fc14

Details about builds:



 389-admin-1.1.15-1.fc14 (FEDORA-2011-2143)
 389 Administration Server (admin)

Update Information:

1.1.15 release - git tag 389-admin-1.1.15
see Bugs for the list of bugs fixed
start-ds-admin.in -- replaced "return 1" with "exit 1"

ChangeLog:

* Wed Feb 23 2011 Rich Megginson  - 1.1.15-1
- 1.1.15 release - git tag 389-admin-1.1.15
- Bug 493424 - remove unneeded modules for admin server apache config
- Bug 618897 - Wrong permissions when creating instance from Console
- Bug 672468 - Don't use empty path elements in LD_LIBRARY_PATH
- Bug 245278 - Changing to a password with a single quote does not work
- Bug 604881 - admin server log files have incorrect permissions/ownerships
- Bug 387981 - plain files can be chosen on the Restore Directory dialog
- Bug 668950 - Add posix group support to Console
- Bug 618858 - move start-ds-admin env file into main admin server config path
- Bug 616260 - libds-admin-serv linking fails due to unresolved link-time depe
ndencies
- start-ds-admin.in -- replaced "return 1" with "exit 1"
- Bug 151705 - Need to update Console Cipher Preferences with new ciphers
- Bug 470576 - Migration could do addition checks before commiting actions

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #672468 - CVE-2011-0532 Directory Server: use of insecure 
LD_LIBRARY_PATH settings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672468




 389-ds-base-1.2.8-0.3.a3.fc14 (FEDORA-2011-2128)
 389 Directory Server (base)

Update Information:

1.2.8.a3 release - git tag 389-ds-base-1.2.8.a3
see bugs for a list of bugs fixed
This is the 1.2.8 alpha 2 release - many bug fixes
389-ds-base 1.2.8 alpha 1
contains many bug fixes

ChangeLog:

* Wed Feb  9 2011 Rich Megginson  - 1.2.8-0.3.a3
- 1.2.8.a3 release - git tag 389-ds-base-1.2.8.a3
- Bug 675320 - empty modify operation with repl on or lastmod off will crash 
server
- Bug 675265 - preventryusn gets added to entries on a failed delete
- Bug 64 - added support for tmpfiles.d
-

Re: ktorrent-konqi bug

[Rex Dieter]

A. Mani wrote:

> This bug is happening in stable ktorrent in F14 (x86-64) as well and
> is a Fedora problem apparently.
> 
> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=265492

drkonqi (kde crash-handler) script expects debuginfo-install to be present, 
but we currently don't have a dependency on it.

Looks like we'll need to make the script more robust or add the dep.

-- Rex

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: conf for gnome-shell

[Matthias Clasen]

On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 21:31 -0800, Rob Healey wrote:
> Greetings All:
> 
> Since I can't get into my gnome-shell, what config file would let me
> switch back to gnome2???
> 

You cannot switch back to gnome2 per se, since that no longer exits. But
I have updated https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Gnome3 with some
more concrete information about how to force the fallback mode.

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: gnome-shell ???

[Christoph Frieben]

2011/2/24 Rob Healey:
> So from this email message that you sent to me, are you saying that it is now
> fixed and ready to be used?

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679944
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Running abrt-cli in live isos for graphics test days?

[mike cloaked]

On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 4:37 PM, Jiri Moskovcak  wrote:

> The retrace server is being deployed for F15 right now. This process can
> take a few hours, so we will send an update (with links to required
> tools) as soon as it finishes. Btw even when the server is up&running it
> will be probably slow and can't take many simultaneous requests at once
> - it's still running on a testing HW (which should change soon).
>
> Sorry for any inconvenience,

Fantastic and it is wonderfully timed to become available, even if a
little slow, exactly when we need it to solve a real issue.

Thank you for doing the work needed to make it available.
I'll look forward to being able to use it soon.
-- 
mike c
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Running abrt-cli in live isos for graphics test days?

[Adam Williamson]

On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 17:37 +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:

> The retrace server is being deployed for F15 right now. This process can 
> take a few hours, so we will send an update (with links to required 
> tools) as soon as it finishes. Btw even when the server is up&running it 
> will be probably slow and can't take many simultaneous requests at once 
> - it's still running on a testing HW (which should change soon).

Awesome stuff, this will be a really useful tool - thanks, Jiri!
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

gnome-shell ???

[Rob Healey]

Greetings:

So fro this email message that you sent to me, are you saying that it is now
fixed and ready to be used???

Please respond back as quickly as possible...  it is ok to email me directly
if that would be quicker???

I love Gnome-shell, and I LOVE rawhide...  I have been using rawhide since
fc1 ...

Sincerely yours,
Rob G. Healey


>I got the very same issue yesterday, except that I've been running rawhide
>for a while. It was actually related to glib schemas not being updated
>according to latest revisions of the shell.

>http://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-shell/tree/?id=0ee5a05e00551b33bf4c1d221711bf21866a3c51
---
diff --git a/src/shell-a11y.c b/src/shell-a11y.c
index 1715cf6..506df95 100644
--- a/src/shell-a11y.c
+++ b/src/shell-a11y.c
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
#define INIT_METHOD "gnome_accessibility_module_
init"
#define DESKTOP_SCHEMA "org.gnome.desktop.interface"
-#define ACCESSIBILITY_ENABLED_KEY "accessibility"
+#define ACCESSIBILITY_ENABLED_KEY "toolkit-accessibility"
#define AT_SPI_SCHEMA "org.a11y.atspi"
#define ATK_BRIDGE_LOCATION_KEY "atk-bridge-location"
---

> Dear Eric John Nagel:
>
> After the install, did you update the computer using the fedora and
> updates-testing repos?
>
> I had no problems until after I did the update!
>
> Sincerely,
> Rob G. Healey
>


-- 
Sincerely yours,
Rob G. Healey

"Always surround yourself with people that inspire you to
greatness!"
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Running abrt-cli in live isos for graphics test days?

[Jiri Moskovcak]

On 02/23/2011 10:27 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 12:46 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 19:50 +, mike cloaked wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 5:51 PM, Adam Williamson  
>>> wrote:
>>>
 What we really want is to use the retrace server:

 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/RetraceServer

 I should test using that and document it.
>>>
>>> Maybe I am a bit dim but I can't find any documentation on this apart
>>> from the wiki and trac entries - but nothing in the abrt koji info
>>> seems to say if it is included now or how to use it.
>>>
>>> Is there a pointer/url to using it that I can access?
>>
>> There's a script linked from the wiki page which you can just download
>> and run and should work, I think. All you really need to do on the
>> client end is send the traceback to the server, all the complex stuff
>> happens on the server, so the requirements aren't heavy.
>
> I just tested it, it seems to not work with F15 reports atm. I've let
> the abrt team know, I hope they'll fix it.

The retrace server is being deployed for F15 right now. This process can 
take a few hours, so we will send an update (with links to required 
tools) as soon as it finishes. Btw even when the server is up&running it 
will be probably slow and can't take many simultaneous requests at once 
- it's still running on a testing HW (which should change soon).

Sorry for any inconvenience,
Jirka
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

[Test-Announce] Fedora 15 Alpha RC#1 Validation Test Recap

[He Rui]

Greetings, 

Thanks for your attention on F-15 Alpha RC#1 test event. Alpha priority
tests and most of other test cases against installation and desktop have
been executed and a list of bugs are classified as below:

 Installation *

* F15Alpha-NTH(bug#657617):

677131 MODIFIED  - How to skip update disk prompt

* F15Beta(bug#657618):

677953 NEW  - Unable to kickstart with ks.cfg file stored on hard drive 
646843 NEW  - images/install.img will no longer exist in F-15 and newer 
676968 ASSIGNED  - system halts after first reboot during kickstart
installation 
678081 ASSIGNED  - Updates.img delivery via installation source not
working 
676821 MODIFIED  - Couldn't resolve host name when installing packages
over NFS 
678150 MODIFIED  - VNC install w/ password, fails to establish password
for VNC session 
676815 ON_QA  - Upgrade from F14 to F15 Alpha TC1 failed due to package
conflicts 
677218 CLOSED DUPLICATE - missing iso 9660 image during installation via
NFS 
676821 MODIFIED  - Couldn't resolve host name when installing packages
over NFS

* F15Blocker(bug#617261):

677080 NEW  - 'F14' artwork is shown during F-15 installation 
676551 MODIFIED  - no prompt for mediacheck 
678413 MODIFIED  - NFS ISO installs require the presence of .treeinfo 

* Warnings:

680016 NEW  - failed to install from hard drive since package rpm cannot
be opened 
679709 NEW  - Unable to retrieve ftp repository unless adding a http
repo first
585006 NEW  - anaconda and livecd-creator are creating i386 and x86_64
ISOs which are larger than indicated by the ISO header
63 MODIFIED  - F-15-Alpha DVD install (TC2) prompts for networking
at repo step
679171 POST  - Hitting enter to move to Next screen crashes firstboot
679466 NEW  - KeyError: 

** Desktop *

None 

To view the detailed test results, please refer to :

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Fedora_15_Alpha_RC_Test_Results


As you can see that quite a number of bugs exist, but no Alpha blocker
bugs were found on this build by executing the cases. Many thanks for
the leadership of robatino as well as the participation of jreznik and
jaycee. Hope next time there will be more testers providing test results
on the pages. :)


Cheers,
Hurry 

-- 
Contacts

Hurry
FAS Name: Rhe 
Timezone: UTC+8
TEL: 86-010-62608141
IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh

___
test-announce mailing list
test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: gnome-shell and updates-testing...

[Christoph Frieben]

2011/2/24  :
> I got the very same issue yesterday, except that I've been running rawhide
> for a while. It was actually related to glib schemas not being updated
> according to latest revisions of the shell.

The latest bunch of GNOME3 updates (2.91.90) included an updated
package gsettings-desktop-schemas-0.1.7-1.fc15. Is it that what you
mean? -C
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: gnome-shell and updates-testing...

[pierre]

I got the very same issue yesterday, except that I've been running rawhide
for a while. It was actually related to glib schemas not being updated
according to latest revisions of the shell.

http://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-shell/tree/?id=0ee5a05e00551b33bf4c1d221711bf21866a3c51
---
diff --git a/src/shell-a11y.c b/src/shell-a11y.c
index 1715cf6..506df95 100644
--- a/src/shell-a11y.c
+++ b/src/shell-a11y.c
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
#define INIT_METHOD "gnome_accessibility_module_init"
#define DESKTOP_SCHEMA "org.gnome.desktop.interface"
-#define ACCESSIBILITY_ENABLED_KEY "accessibility"
+#define ACCESSIBILITY_ENABLED_KEY "toolkit-accessibility"
#define AT_SPI_SCHEMA "org.a11y.atspi"
#define ATK_BRIDGE_LOCATION_KEY "atk-bridge-location"
---

> Dear Eric John Nagel:
>
> After the install, did you update the computer using the fedora and
> updates-testing repos?
>
> I had no problems until after I did the update!
>
> Sincerely,
> Rob G. Healey
>
>
> Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 20:04:33 -0600
> From: Eric John Nagel 
> Subject: Re: gnome-shell and updates-testing fc and rawhide/fc...
> To: For testers of Fedora development releases
>
> Message-ID:
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>>I installed the F15-Alpha-RC1-x86-Live (gnome) and have had relitively
>> few
>>problems (for Alpha)
>
>>On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 7:56 PM, Rob Healey  wrote:
>
>> Greetings All:
>>
>> I decided to blow up my computer and re-load the OS...  I loaded the
>> F-15-Alpha-RC1-x86_64-Live-KDE iso...
>>
>> After install, I ran:
>>
>> yum groupinstall "GNOME Desktop Environment", and it loaded a lot of
>> packages including the gnome-shell...
>>
>> I rebooted my machine and chose to start Gnome from the KDE login
> screen...
>>
>> Now, I get nothing that is usable in the gnome-shell!  I get only the
> blank
>> blue screen with the vertical lines running down it.  The upper panel
>> bar
> is
>> gone and the left corner with the mouse doesn't work either!
>>
>> Since the fc15 updates-testing update broke gnome-shell, so I decided to
>> upgrade to rawhide now.  It still doesn't work...
>>
>> I am NOT sure what to do to get it working either!  I am NOT a KDE man,
> but
>> I have to use it to get into my computer right now!  I know that there
>> are
>> different windows managers, but Gnome is my favourite!!!
>>
>> Please help me ...
>>
>> I hope that this might be able to fixed soon if it is a problem...
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sincerely yours,
>> Rob G. Healey
>
> --
> Sincerely yours,
> Rob G. Healey
>
> "Always surround yourself with people that inspire you to
> greatness!"
> --
> test mailing list
> test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test


-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Running abrt-cli in live isos for graphics test days?

[Jiri Moskovcak]

On 02/23/2011 08:50 PM, mike cloaked wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 5:51 PM, Adam Williamson  wrote:
>
>> What we really want is to use the retrace server:
>>
>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/RetraceServer
>>
>> I should test using that and document it.
>
> Maybe I am a bit dim but I can't find any documentation on this apart
> from the wiki and trac entries - but nothing in the abrt koji info
> seems to say if it is included now or how to use it.
>
> Is there a pointer/url to using it that I can access?
>
> Thanks
>

The new ABRT version will have option to use the retrace server instead 
of the local retracing. The new version should be out in a few days (at 
least in git and my personal repo). Before that anyone interested can 
find the retrace client cmdline tool (better than the mentioned script) 
in retrace branch in abrt git.

J.
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Running abrt-cli in live isos for graphics test days?

[Jiri Moskovcak]

On 02/23/2011 08:38 PM, Samuel Greenfeld wrote:
> Just curious, but has anyone considered something like Microsoft's
> symbol server system, which can download symbols for specific executable
> files from one or more central repositories?
>
> They have public servers which can be used to download symbols for
> released products, and private ones can be setup as well.
>
> (I would not know the legal logistics of setting up a similar system.)
>

There was something like it:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DebuginfoFS

but it's dead now, if they are some people interested to bring this idea 
back, it would be awesome.

J.

> ---
> SJG
>
>
> On 02/23/11 14:06, John Watzke wrote:
>>  What we really want is to use the retrace server:
>>  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/RetraceServer
>>  I should test using that and document it.
>>
>>
>> That sounds interesting.  As long as it has some security in place it
>> would sound great.  The nice thing about backtraces is that the user can
>> take a look at what is being sent and thus take out sensitive data.
>> If the cores were transmitted with SSL and locked down so that no one
>> (other than the admins of course which we hope we trust) would ever had
>> access to the original core files, then it might work. It seems like
>> there is this kind of security discussed... of course, you still have to
>> trust the super users.
>>
>> -- John Watzke
>>
>

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

gnome-shell and updates-testing...

[Rob Healey]

Dear Eric John Nagel:

After the install, did you update the computer using the fedora and
updates-testing repos?

I had no problems until after I did the update!

Sincerely,
Rob G. Healey


Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 20:04:33 -0600
From: Eric John Nagel 
Subject: Re: gnome-shell and updates-testing fc and rawhide/fc...
To: For testers of Fedora development releases
   
Message-ID:
   
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

>I installed the F15-Alpha-RC1-x86-Live (gnome) and have had relitively few
>problems (for Alpha)

>On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 7:56 PM, Rob Healey  wrote:

> Greetings All:
>
> I decided to blow up my computer and re-load the OS...  I loaded the
> F-15-Alpha-RC1-x86_64-Live-KDE iso...
>
> After install, I ran:
>
> yum groupinstall "GNOME Desktop Environment", and it loaded a lot of
> packages including the gnome-shell...
>
> I rebooted my machine and chose to start Gnome from the KDE login
screen...
>
> Now, I get nothing that is usable in the gnome-shell!  I get only the
blank
> blue screen with the vertical lines running down it.  The upper panel bar
is
> gone and the left corner with the mouse doesn't work either!
>
> Since the fc15 updates-testing update broke gnome-shell, so I decided to
> upgrade to rawhide now.  It still doesn't work...
>
> I am NOT sure what to do to get it working either!  I am NOT a KDE man,
but
> I have to use it to get into my computer right now!  I know that there are
> different windows managers, but Gnome is my favourite!!!
>
> Please help me ...
>
> I hope that this might be able to fixed soon if it is a problem...
>
>
> --
> Sincerely yours,
> Rob G. Healey

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Rob G. Healey

"Always surround yourself with people that inspire you to
greatness!"
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test