Re: Gnome3: I did it!

2011-03-22 Thread Joachim Backes 

On 03/23/2011 04:48 AM, Petrus de Calguarium wrote:

Wow! That is really nice!!!

I will definitely be looking around quite a lot more. Already, I can say that
Activities are much better thought out and implemented than the confusing and
generally somewhat useless KDE variant.

I am confused by the user account, since I logged in as me, but it says the
account is administrator.



I think you've been asked during installation whether your account 
should be an admin account or not. And it seems you agreed.


--
Joachim Backes 

http://www.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

[Fedora QA] #181: proventester request (ueno)

2011-03-22 Thread Fedora QA 
#181: proventester request (ueno)
-+--
 Reporter:  ueno |   Owner: 
 Type:  proventester request |  Status:  new
 Priority:  minor|   Milestone: 
Component:  Proventester Mentor Request  | Version: 
 Keywords:   |  
-+--
 I would like to become a proventester.  I'm working mainly on I18N related
 packages in Fedora so I think I can help test packages in that area.

 I've read the documentation at
 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Proven_tester and understand it well.  I
 have been using bodhi for a year to submit updates.

-- 
Ticket URL: 
Fedora QA 
Fedora Quality Assurance
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Gnome3: I did it!

2011-03-22 Thread Petrus de Calguarium 
Wow! That is really nice!!!

I will definitely be looking around quite a lot more. Already, I can say that 
Activities are much better thought out and implemented than the confusing and 
generally somewhat useless KDE variant.

I am confused by the user account, since I logged in as me, but it says the 
account is administrator.

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Gnome3: how to do it?

2011-03-22 Thread Adam Williamson 
On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 12:03 -0600, Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
> 
> > What 'cruft' are you talking about?
> 
> I just want pure gnome3, no old cruft. How do I get it?

I still have no idea what you mean by 'old cruft'.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

F-15 Branched report: 20110322 changes

2011-03-22 Thread Branched Report 
Compose started at Tue Mar 22 13:16:02 UTC 2011

Broken deps for x86_64
--
Io-language-extras-20080330-4.fc15.x86_64 requires 
libevent-1.4.so.2()(64bit)
byzanz-0.2.2-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libpanel-applet-2.so.0()(64bit)
coccinelle-0.2.5-0.rc4.2.fc15.1.x86_64 requires ocaml(Ograph2way) = 
0:7442f647b0a74ed48a5c9361fc42ccc4
coccinelle-0.2.5-0.rc4.2.fc15.1.x86_64 requires ocaml(Flag) = 
0:522d7f86f1236405e53271ff74923515
coccinelle-0.2.5-0.rc4.2.fc15.1.x86_64 requires ocaml(Osetb) = 
0:8f21a0a4f771662673604ed92a237d79
coccinelle-0.2.5-0.rc4.2.fc15.1.x86_64 requires ocaml(Oassocb) = 
0:d873c4a1eeb6fa5c5333f8658c49d1db
coccinelle-0.2.5-0.rc4.2.fc15.1.x86_64 requires ocaml(Setb) = 
0:93bdb588146a13126bfad4eab6c58206
coccinelle-0.2.5-0.rc4.2.fc15.1.x86_64 requires ocaml(Oassoc_buffer) = 
0:cf6fbee4fcc6644a0a90f07da8eb6c7b
coccinelle-0.2.5-0.rc4.2.fc15.1.x86_64 requires ocaml(Mapb) = 
0:617c09a110cef9f040335b35078c7234
coccinelle-0.2.5-0.rc4.2.fc15.1.x86_64 requires ocaml(Sexplib) = 
0:a990ea80438337d5407bbc0343c7236a
coccinelle-0.2.5-0.rc4.2.fc15.1.x86_64 requires ocaml(Dumper) = 
0:76126ba149caeb2d34f12e11187a9d4e
coccinelle-0.2.5-0.rc4.2.fc15.1.x86_64 requires ocaml(Oassoch) = 
0:87f7dc2635e5a7ed1ab03b7cd5380ace
coccinelle-0.2.5-0.rc4.2.fc15.1.x86_64 requires ocaml(SetPt) = 
0:b69c030e8ca717d556d3d9bd2a5d22fd
coccinelle-0.2.5-0.rc4.2.fc15.1.x86_64 requires ocaml(ANSITerminal) = 
0:3d0d1700618d8b3a4e4b2308f28cefb6
coccinelle-0.2.5-0.rc4.2.fc15.1.x86_64 requires ocaml(Oseti) = 
0:a937e7661f510c17bfd21d4372507795
conmux-0.0-12.493svn.fc15.noarch requires perl(Payload)
conmux-0.0-12.493svn.fc15.noarch requires perl(Client)
cpm-0.23-0.3.beta.fc12.x86_64 requires libdotconf-1.0.so.0()(64bit)
db4o-7.4-2.fc13.x86_64 requires mono(Mono.GetOptions) = 0:2.0.0.0
dbmail-3.0.0-0.3.rc1.fc15.x86_64 requires libevent-1.4.so.2()(64bit)
dbmail-auth-ldap-3.0.0-0.3.rc1.fc15.x86_64 requires 
libevent-1.4.so.2()(64bit)
dh-make-0.55-3.fc15.noarch requires debhelper
dogtag-pki-1.3.0-2.fc13.noarch requires dogtag-pki-ca-ui
dogtag-pki-1.3.0-2.fc13.noarch requires dogtag-pki-tps-ui
dogtag-pki-1.3.0-2.fc13.noarch requires dogtag-pki-common-ui
dogtag-pki-1.3.0-2.fc13.noarch requires dogtag-pki-ra-ui
dogtag-pki-1.3.0-2.fc13.noarch requires dogtag-pki-console-ui
dogtag-pki-1.3.0-2.fc13.noarch requires dogtag-pki-ocsp-ui
dogtag-pki-1.3.0-2.fc13.noarch requires dogtag-pki-kra-ui
dogtag-pki-1.3.0-2.fc13.noarch requires dogtag-pki-tks-ui
eog-plugins-2.30.0-2.fc14.x86_64 requires libgdata.so.7()(64bit)
1:fife-0.3.2-1.fc15.i686 requires libboost_regex.so.1.44.0
1:fife-0.3.2-1.fc15.i686 requires libboost_system.so.1.44.0
1:fife-0.3.2-1.fc15.i686 requires libboost_filesystem.so.1.44.0
1:fife-0.3.2-1.fc15.x86_64 requires libboost_regex.so.1.44.0()(64bit)
1:fife-0.3.2-1.fc15.x86_64 requires libboost_system.so.1.44.0()(64bit)
1:fife-0.3.2-1.fc15.x86_64 requires 
libboost_filesystem.so.1.44.0()(64bit)
file-browser-applet-0.6.6-1.fc15.x86_64 requires 
libpanel-applet-2.so.0()(64bit)
gcstar-1.6.1-3.fc15.noarch requires perl(Gtk2::ScrolledWindow)
gcstar-1.6.1-3.fc15.noarch requires perl(Gtk2::Dialog)
gcstar-1.6.1-3.fc15.noarch requires perl(Gtk2::Toolbar)
gcstar-1.6.1-3.fc15.noarch requires perl(Gtk2::TreeView)
gcstar-1.6.1-3.fc15.noarch requires perl(Gtk2::MenuBar)
gcstar-1.6.1-3.fc15.noarch requires perl(Gtk2::VBox)
gcstar-1.6.1-3.fc15.noarch requires perl(Gtk2::Window)
gcstar-1.6.1-3.fc15.noarch requires perl(Gtk2::MessageDialog)
glom-1.16.1-2.fc15.x86_64 requires libgdamm-4.0.so.12()(64bit)
glom-libs-1.16.1-2.fc15.i686 requires libgdamm-4.0.so.12
glom-libs-1.16.1-2.fc15.x86_64 requires libgdamm-4.0.so.12()(64bit)
glunarclock-0.34.1-1.fc14.x86_64 requires 
libpanel-applet-2.so.0()(64bit)
gnome-applet-bubblemon-2.0.15-1.fc13.x86_64 requires 
libpanel-applet-2.so.0()(64bit)
gnome-applet-cpufire-1.6-3.fc14.x86_64 requires 
libpanel-applet-2.so.0()(64bit)
gnome-applet-globalmenu-0.7.9-1.fc15.x86_64 requires 
libpanel-applet-2.so.0()(64bit)
gnome-applet-grandr-0.4.1-2.fc12.x86_64 requires 
libpanel-applet-2.so.0()(64bit)
gnome-applet-music-2.5.1-5.fc15.x86_64 requires 
libpanel-applet-2.so.0()(64bit)
gnome-applet-sensors-2.2.7-4.fc15.i686 requires libpanel-applet-2.so.0
gnome-applet-sensors-2.2.7-4.fc15.x86_64 requires 
libpanel-applet-2.so.0()(64bit)
gnome-applet-sshmenu-3.18-3.fc15.noarch requires ruby(panelapplet2)
gnome-applet-window-picker-0.5.8-2.fc14.x86_64 requires 
libpanel-applet-2.so.0()(64bit)
1:gnome-applets-2.32.0-3.f

[Fedora QA] #180: Create Package Specific Test Cases for Design Suite

2011-03-22 Thread Fedora QA 
#180: Create Package Specific Test Cases for Design Suite
-+--
 Reporter:  sdz  |   Owner:   
 Type:  task |  Status:  new  
 Priority:  minor|   Milestone:  Fedora 15
Component:  Wiki | Version:   
 Keywords:  design suite, package test plan  |  
-+--
 The Design Suite has been promoted at SXSW and other conferences. We want
 to make sure that the included applications are all working and in a good
 state. Adam introduced package specific test cases at FUDCon in Tempe. We
 should consider creating test cases for the most important tools, such as
 blender, gimp, inkscape and shotwell.

-- 
Ticket URL: 
Fedora QA 
Fedora Quality Assurance
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Illegible panel field.

2011-03-22 Thread Jason D. Clinton 
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 15:03, Erik P. Olsen  wrote:

> The field in the upper panel that contains date and time has black
> background
> and so is the text. When I move the mouse over the field the background
> changes
> to white and the text becomes legible.
>
> It's F15, fully upgraded and installed in VirtualBox.
>

Fallback Mode is still getting some polish from vuntz upstream.
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Illegible panel field.

2011-03-22 Thread Erik P. Olsen 
The field in the upper panel that contains date and time has black background 
and so is the text. When I move the mouse over the field the background changes 
to white and the text becomes legible.

It's F15, fully upgraded and installed in VirtualBox.

-- 
Erik
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Fedora 13 updates-testing report

2011-03-22 Thread updates 
The following Fedora 13 Security updates need testing:

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libvirt-0.8.2-3.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dbus-1.2.24-2.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/krb5-1.7.1-18.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tor-0.2.1.29-1300.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pear-1.9.2-1.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libxml2-2.7.7-2.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dhcp-4.1.2-2.ESV.R1.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openldap-2.4.21-12.fc13

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-5.3.6-1.fc13,maniadrive-1.2-27.fc13,php-eaccelerator-0.9.6.1-6.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/389-admin-1.1.15-1.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnash-0.8.9-1.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/phpMyAdmin-3.3.10-1.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libcgroup-0.35.1-5.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wordpress-3.1-1.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/feh-1.10.1-1.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/postfix-2.7.3-1.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mhonarc-2.6.18-3.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libtiff-3.9.4-4.fc13


The following Fedora 13 Critical Path updates have yet to be approved:

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/usbmuxd-1.0.7-1.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libtiff-3.9.4-4.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libnl-1.1-14.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/selinux-policy-3.7.19-101.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/policycoreutils-2.0.83-33.4.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tzdata-2011d-1.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tzdata-2011b-3.fc13

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-ExtUtils-XSpp-0.15-2.fc13,perl-5.10.1-122.fc13,perl-Wx-0.98-5.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libxml2-2.7.7-2.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fuse-2.8.5-5.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/NetworkManager-0.8.3.997-1.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libcgroup-0.35.1-5.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openldap-2.4.21-12.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/livecd-tools-13.2-1.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lua-5.1.4-7.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/librsvg2-2.26.3-3.fc13

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mobile-broadband-provider-info-1.20110218-1.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dosfstools-3.0.9-4.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/file-5.04-7.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/system-config-users-1.2.107-1.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-ethtool-0.6-1.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libical-0.46-2.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mash-0.5.20-1.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libfprint-0.3.0-1.fc13

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xorg-x11-drv-openchrome-0.2.904-7.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lldpad-0.9.26-2.fc13


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora 13 updates-testing

automaton-1.11r6-1.fc13
libnl-1.1-14.fc13
libtiff-3.9.4-4.fc13
mysql-connector-python-0.3.2-2.fc13
qbittorrent-2.7.0-1.fc13
texmakerx-2.1-1.fc13
thai-scalable-fonts-0.4.15-2.fc13
uim-1.6.1-3.fc13
usbmuxd-1.0.7-1.fc13
xfce4-cpufreq-plugin-1.0.0-1.fc13
zeroinstall-injector-0.53-1.fc13

Details about builds:



 automaton-1.11r6-1.fc13 (FEDORA-2011-3838)
 A Java finite state automata/regular expression library

Update Information:

Upstream note on this update:
- performance improvement in Automaton.isFinite - thanks to R. Muir


ChangeLog:

* Mon Mar 21 2011 Jerry James  - 1.11r6-1
- Upgrade to 1.11-6
- Drop %clean section




 libnl-1.1-14.fc13 (FEDORA-2011-3843)
 Convenience library for kernel netlink sockets

ChangeLog:

* Mon Mar 21 2011 Dan Williams  - 1.1-14
- Fix portmap position calculation (rh #677526) (rh #677725)
- Make port allocation threadsafe (rh #677527) (rh #677724)
* Thu May 13 2010 Dan Williams  - 1.1-11
- Update source link for package review (rh #592042)
* Fri Feb 26 2010 Dennis Gilmore  - 1.1-10
- add patch for alignment issues
* Tue Dec 22 2009 John W. Linville  - 1.1-9
- Install libnl into /lib64 instead of /usr/lib64
---

Fedora and Gnome 3

2011-03-22 Thread Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R 
The Monday 64 bit desktop, installed with basic video
driver --  Nvidia installed nominally.  Gnome 3 it is.

If Gnome 3 works the way it seems to work, I need a
bigger screen.  28 inches of 1080x1920 is too small
to have everything visible at once instead of discrete
window panes.  Maybe a 30 inch 1600x2500 will help.
Will Gnome 3 allow window panes to be shown on a
polyhedron, perhaps a octagonal prism 'ala V'ger?

I may be missing something, but I don't see why Gnome 3
couldn't be made to work with a plebian video driver.

-- 
Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R c...@omen.com   www.omen.com
Developer of Industrial ZMODEM(Tm) for Embedded Applications
   Omen Technology Inc  "The High Reliability Software"
10255 NW Old Cornelius Pass Portland OR 97231   503-614-0430

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Gnome3: how to do it?

2011-03-22 Thread Petrus de Calguarium 
Adam Williamson wrote:

> What 'cruft' are you talking about?

I just want pure gnome3, no old cruft. How do I get it?

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: [Fedora QA] #170: Request for F15 Power Management test day

2011-03-22 Thread Fedora QA 
#170: Request for F15 Power Management test day
---+
  Reporter:  jskarvad  |   Owner: 
  Type:  defect|  Status:  new
  Priority:  major |   Milestone: 
 Component:  Test Day  | Version: 
Resolution:|Keywords: 
---+
Comment (by jskarvad):

 Wiki updated. Feel free to change/improve the text. One more problem
 spotted: the results table seems to be too big for average display and
 there is no horizontal scrollbar (in my firefox).

-- 
Ticket URL: 
Fedora QA 
Fedora Quality Assurance
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: [Fedora QA] #170: Request for F15 Power Management test day

2011-03-22 Thread Fedora QA 
#170: Request for F15 Power Management test day
---+
  Reporter:  jskarvad  |   Owner: 
  Type:  defect|  Status:  new
  Priority:  major |   Milestone: 
 Component:  Test Day  | Version: 
Resolution:|Keywords: 
---+
Comment (by jskarvad):

 The LiveCD is ready and seems to work on my testing machines, I will
 update the wiki accordingly.

-- 
Ticket URL: 
Fedora QA 
Fedora Quality Assurance
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: [Fedora QA] #170: Request for F15 Power Management test day

2011-03-22 Thread Fedora QA 
#170: Request for F15 Power Management test day
---+
  Reporter:  jskarvad  |   Owner: 
  Type:  defect|  Status:  new
  Priority:  major |   Milestone: 
 Component:  Test Day  | Version: 
Resolution:|Keywords: 
---+
Comment (by jskarvad):

 I think no problem to add this test case, I will update the wiki.

-- 
Ticket URL: 
Fedora QA 
Fedora Quality Assurance
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: [Fedora QA] #170: Request for F15 Power Management test day

2011-03-22 Thread Fedora QA 
#170: Request for F15 Power Management test day
---+
  Reporter:  jskarvad  |   Owner: 
  Type:  defect|  Status:  new
  Priority:  major |   Milestone: 
 Component:  Test Day  | Version: 
Resolution:|Keywords: 
---+
Comment (by salimma):

 Could we ask laptop users to report whether their backlight control works?
 It affects some laptops using all of Intel i915, Radeon and nVidia cards,
 and there's a patch series from Matthew Garrett that, while not ready for
 merging yet, we might consider providing in a semi-blessed alternate
 kernel repo, similar to what Ubuntu is doing.

 I posted this to the test@ list:
 http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2011-March/098070.html

 Thanks!

-- 
Ticket URL: 
Fedora QA 
Fedora Quality Assurance
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Gnome3: how to do it?

2011-03-22 Thread Adam Williamson 
On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 09:30 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:

> No, it isn't - please don't spread that, it only confuses people.
> Fallback mode uses gnome-panel and nautilus instead of gnome-shell.

...and metacity.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: [Test-Announce] Power Management Test Day on Thursday (2011-03-24)

2011-03-22 Thread Michel Alexandre Salim 
On 03/22/2011 05:15 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
 > The Fedora 15 Test Day schedule continues to roll, and this week it's
 > the turn of power management:
 >
 > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2011-03-24
 >
 > This event will concentrate on testing how well various common power
 > management operations work on a range of systems, and also on testing
 > the functionality of the new generation PowerTOP[1] utility.
 >
Speaking of power management, there's a known problem with backlight 
control on some laptops that require native backlight control, rather 
than the standard ACPI interface.

Red Hat's own Matthew Garrett posted the patch series[1], but I've not 
seen it applied in any publicly-available Git tree (do point me to one, 
if anyone knows) apart from Canonical employee Kamal Mostafa's 
linux-kamal-mjgbacklight[2]

Would it be possible, during the test day, to find out how many people 
are affected by this (e.g. by adding backlight control to the list of 
things to check)? If there are many out there -- including my Vaio Y -- 
we might want to consider providing a semi-blessed repo with a patched 
kernel.

PS does mjg have a public kernel git tree? I could not find one.

   1. http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.acpi.devel/48990
   2. https://launchpad.net/~kamalmostafa/+archive/linux-kamal-mjgbacklight

Thanks,

-- 
Michel Alexandre Salim
Fedora Project Contributor: http://fedoraproject.org/

Email:  sali...@fedoraproject.org  | GPG key ID: 78884778
Jabber: hir...@jabber.ccc.de   | IRC: hir...@irc.freenode.net

()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\  www.asciiribbon.org   - against proprietary attachments

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Gnome3: how to do it?

2011-03-22 Thread Adam Williamson 
On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 10:20 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 22:15, Michael Cronenworth  wrote:
> > On 03/21/2011 08:56 PM, Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
> >> How can I get just gnome3?
> >
> > There is no more Gnome 2. Gnome 2 is deprecated in favor of Gnome 3.
> > Fedora 15 will only contain Gnome 3.0.
> >
> > No one will maintain or distribute any part of Gnome 2.
> 
> I am guessing there is confusion over Gnome Fallback which is gnome2 based.

No, it isn't - please don't spread that, it only confuses people.
Fallback mode uses gnome-panel and nautilus instead of gnome-shell. That
doesn't mean it's 'gnome 2'. It behaves quite differently from how GNOME
2 behaved and it's explicitly intended to behave as similarly as
possible to how Shell behaves.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Gnome3: how to do it?

2011-03-22 Thread Stephen John Smoogen 
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 22:15, Michael Cronenworth  wrote:
> On 03/21/2011 08:56 PM, Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
>> How can I get just gnome3?
>
> There is no more Gnome 2. Gnome 2 is deprecated in favor of Gnome 3.
> Fedora 15 will only contain Gnome 3.0.
>
> No one will maintain or distribute any part of Gnome 2.

I am guessing there is confusion over Gnome Fallback which is gnome2 based.





-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.
"The core skill of innovators is error recovery, not failure avoidance."
Randy Nelson, President of Pixar University.
"Let us be kind, one to another, for most of us are fighting a hard
battle." -- Ian MacLaren
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

[Test-Announce] Power Management Test Day on Thursday (2011-03-24)

2011-03-22 Thread Adam Williamson 
The Fedora 15 Test Day schedule continues to roll, and this week it's
the turn of power management:

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2011-03-24

This event will concentrate on testing how well various common power
management operations work on a range of systems, and also on testing
the functionality of the new generation PowerTOP[1] utility.

As this Test Day aims to test out existing functionality on a range of
hardware, it's vital that we get as many testers as possible so we can
find as many bugs as we can! The testing is easy, quick and will be
possible entirely from a live CD - the Test Day team are currently
working on creating the live CD. QA and development team members will be
available all day to help you with testing and reporting your results.
Full instructions are available on the Wiki page, and we'll be in
#fedora-test-day on Freenode IRC[2] all day long.

Please do come along and help out on Thursday if you have a bit of spare
time! Thanks a lot.

1. http://www.lesswatts.org/projects/powertop
2. irc://irc.freenode.net/fedora-test-day
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

___
test-announce mailing list
test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: F15 - anaconda + lorax karma needed - STILL NEEDED

2011-03-22 Thread James Laska 
On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 07:27 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 21:52 -0400, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> > On 03/21/2011 07:02 PM, James Laska wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 16:11 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> > >> Greetings folks,
> > >>
> > >> As mentioned during the QA meeting today, I promised to provide
> > >> custom-built boot.iso (x86_64) so folks can add some bodhi karma for two
> > >> important updates.  The following updates are needed in order to proceed
> > >> with building Beta TC and RC milestones.
> > >>
> > >>* https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/anaconda-15.24-1.fc15
> > >>* https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lorax-0.3.2-1.fc15
> > >>
> > >> The x86_64 boot.iso is available from
> > >> http://jlaska.fedorapeople.org/boot.iso.  Alternatively, you can provide
> > >> anaconda karma feedback by updating to the latest anaconda on an
> > >> existing live image.
> > >
> > > Updated x86_64 boot.iso is now available.  Apologies for the delay.
> > >
> > > # sha256sum boot.iso
> > > 486c22fbb850d27c73a120d76e085808199b9cdac4db64c7b90959fb62559e97
> > > boot.iso
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > James
> > >
> > 
> > Get as far as bz 684383.
> 
> Thanks for the feedback Clyde!  The bug you mention(682543) is still a
> known failure and not intended to be resolved in this particular update.
> IMO, it's appropriate to provide positive karma since you can now at
> least hit that failure again.

Note ... the proposed updates are still in need of karma feedback.  I
also just updated the boot.iso to include the latest fedora-logos
package.  If you test with the provided boot.iso [1], or a nightly LIVE
image [2] with updates applied, please provide karma feedback to the
following updates:

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/anaconda-15.24-1.fc15
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lorax-0.3.2-1.fc15
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fedora-logos-15.0.0-1.fc15

Thanks,
James

[1] http://jlaska.fedorapeople.org/boot.iso
[2] http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/nightly-composes/desktop/


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: A broken link after brutal power-off?

2011-03-22 Thread Luigi Votta 
On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 14:43 +0100, Luigi Votta wrote:
> Hi all, 
> today after the updates I get a blank screen and some missing icons as
> already reported here by other people. So i decided to undo all this
> update to the previous system snaphot (yum history undo #).
> I've tried to reboot but the system hanged so I powered-off.
> 
> After that the system was unable to boot (Kernel panic it said relative
> to a library (libgcc).
> 
> Rebooted with f14 and after investigation i found a broken link:
> /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 > libcc_s_4.6.0-20110321.so.1
> instead of 
> /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 -> libgcc_s-4.6.0-20110318.so.1 
> 
> So, probably the abrupt action was the cause of this ?!
> 
> Thank you in advance
> Luigi
> 
> 
However after updating samll groups of related SW, except
gsettings-daemon-schemas, and logging out & in,
brings on a relaxing background,
(after this extra effort)

:-)

> 
> 





signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: A broken link after brutal power-off?

2011-03-22 Thread Adam Williamson 
On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 14:43 +0100, Luigi Votta wrote:
> Hi all, 
> today after the updates I get a blank screen and some missing icons as
> already reported here by other people. So i decided to undo all this
> update to the previous system snaphot (yum history undo #).
> I've tried to reboot but the system hanged so I powered-off.
> 
> After that the system was unable to boot (Kernel panic it said relative
> to a library (libgcc).
> 
> Rebooted with f14 and after investigation i found a broken link:
> /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 > libcc_s_4.6.0-20110321.so.1
> instead of 
> /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 -> libgcc_s-4.6.0-20110318.so.1 
> 
> So, probably the abrupt action was the cause of this ?!

Looks to me like you rebooted while the yum process was still going;
specifically, while gcc was being downgraded. So you got stuck with a
broken gcc. Just a guess, but that's what I would say happened.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: optimizing systemd, was: f15 no longer starts

2011-03-22 Thread Adam Williamson 
On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 14:44 +0200, cornel panceac wrote:
> alright adam but, what do you think can be done to prevent such a
> think happen again?

A good one would be 'don't break rsyslog'. =) But really, this failure
doesn't worry me much. It's a pre-release, things break in pre-release
development. Our update testing system worked exactly as it's supposed
to: the broken update never made it into the release stream. AFAICS, all
QA goals were met here.

>  it is possible to change/reconfigure systemd in such a way that a
> failing service will not just keep the system from booting?

Is it possible to change our initscripts such that this particular
failure has less of an impact? Probably. Is that a good change that we
ought to do? Possibly, possibly not; it looks like it'd have significant
consequences. It's something to talk to Bill and Lennart about, I'd say.
I'm not sure they follow this list, so either bring it up on devel list,
or in the bug report.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

[Test-Announce] Test Results:Fedora 15 Pre-Beta Acceptance Test recap

2011-03-22 Thread Hongqing Yang 
Greetings,

The Fedora 15 Pre Beta Acceptance Test is blocked by #bug 684742, I am waiting 
for the new update to test the following test cases.
since the Beta TC will be released, I would like to submit the summary now.

The following two bugs occurred during the test:

Bug 689755 - Comps Validity Failed
Bug 684742 - glibc dynamic library loading bug causes installs to fail 

and But 684742 has been verified to be fixed.  

Hongqing YANG
___
test-announce mailing list
test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: blind committer?

2011-03-22 Thread Brian Millett 
On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 13:49 +0100, Martin Sourada wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 07:35:33 -0500 
> Brian Millett wrote:
> 
>  
> > GLib-GIO-ERROR **: Settings schema 'org.gnome.desktop.background' does
> > not contain a key named 'picture-filename'
> > aborting...
> > 
> Change done in gsettings-desktop-schemas (uses now picture-uri) but not
> in gnome-desktop3 and control center. Either downgrade the first one to
> 2.91.91 or wait till the other two are upgraded to 2.91.92. Or at least
> that's what I think is the core of the problem.

downgrade did the trick.

I feel happy... I feel happy.

-- 
Brian Millett -
[ Talia Winters and Karl Mueller, "The Quality of Mercy"]
"How many? How many?"
'How many worlds are there? How many banquets? How many flowers waiting
to be harvested? How many new voices waiting to be included into my
choir? I have to keep adding voices until the choir is big enough to
sing me into Heaven when I die. It's necessary, don't you see? The
overture is just beginning, Ms. Winters. Just beginning.'



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

A broken link after brutal power-off?

2011-03-22 Thread Luigi Votta 
Hi all, 
today after the updates I get a blank screen and some missing icons as
already reported here by other people. So i decided to undo all this
update to the previous system snaphot (yum history undo #).
I've tried to reboot but the system hanged so I powered-off.

After that the system was unable to boot (Kernel panic it said relative
to a library (libgcc).

Rebooted with f14 and after investigation i found a broken link:
/lib/libgcc_s.so.1 > libcc_s_4.6.0-20110321.so.1
instead of 
/lib/libgcc_s.so.1 -> libgcc_s-4.6.0-20110318.so.1 

So, probably the abrupt action was the cause of this ?!

Thank you in advance
Luigi






signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: blind committer?

2011-03-22 Thread Joachim Backes 
On 03/22/2011 01:49 PM, Martin Sourada wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 07:35:33 -0500 
> Brian Millett wrote:
> 
>  
>> GLib-GIO-ERROR **: Settings schema 'org.gnome.desktop.background' does
>> not contain a key named 'picture-filename'
>> aborting...
>>
> Change done in gsettings-desktop-schemas (uses now picture-uri) but not
> in gnome-desktop3 and control center. Either downgrade the first one to
> 2.91.91

Is a good workaround, works for me!

or wait till the other two are upgraded to 2.91.92. Or at least
> that's what I think is the core of the problem.
> 
> Martin
> 

Kind regards

Joachim Backes 

http://www.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: After most recent update

2011-03-22 Thread Joachim Backes 
On 03/22/2011 01:46 PM, Martin Sourada wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 06:36:15 -0600 
> Lawrence E Graves wrote:
> 
>> I had the same problems.  No background.  Everthing works ok just no
>> background.
>>
> What versions of the following components do you have (if you have
> them installed)?
> 
> gnome-desktop3
> control-center
> gsettings-desktop-schemas
> desktop-backgrounds-gnome

gnome-desktop3-2.91.91-1.fc15.x86_64
control-center-2.91.91-1.fc15.x86_64
gsettings-desktop-schemas-2.91.92-1.fc15.noarch
desktop-backgrounds-gnome-15.0.0-5.fc15.noarch

> 
> I suspect a change in how wallpaper is set between 2.91.91 and 2.91.92
> of the first three which however has been propagated only to
> gsettings-desktop-schemas so far in fedora.
> 
> Martin
> 

Kind regards
-- 
Joachim Backes 

http://www.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: After most recent F15 updates, gnome-shell does no more display all menu icons

2011-03-22 Thread Steven Haigh 
Yeah - a lot of stuff is screwed up at the moment. Control Center 
crashes when trying to get in to change the background and a whole heap 
of graphics and icons are missing. Pretty ugly stuff right now.

-- 
Steven Haigh

Email: net...@crc.id.au
Web: http://www.crc.id.au
Phone: (03) 9001 6090 - 0412 935 897
Fax: (03) 8338 0299

On 22/03/2011 11:31 PM, Joachim Backes wrote:
> After taday having updated my system, I miss some icons in the
> activities bar (for example gmone-terminal), and in
> Activities->Applications: The icons are lost, only the icon identifier
> is visible, but not the icon itself. That is valid for a lot of
> applications, for example "CD/DVD creator" or "Calculator". And much more.
>
> Anybody sees this too?
>
> List of updated packages:
>
> Mar 22 13:13:43 Updated: libgcc-4.6.0-0.15.fc15.x86_64
> Mar 22 13:13:53 Updated: glibc-common-2.13.90-7.x86_64
> Mar 22 13:13:56 Updated: glibc-2.13.90-7.x86_64
> Mar 22 13:14:00 Updated: glib2-2.28.4-1.fc15.x86_64
> Mar 22 13:14:01 Updated: libgnome-keyring-2.91.93-1.fc15.x86_64
> Mar 22 13:14:02 Updated: libnotify-0.7.2-1.fc15.x86_64
> Mar 22 13:14:02 Updated: libstdc++-4.6.0-0.15.fc15.x86_64
> Mar 22 13:14:03 Updated: libXi-1.4.2-1.fc15.x86_64
> Mar 22 13:14:05 Updated: gtk3-3.0.4-1.fc15.x86_64
> Mar 22 13:14:07 Updated: 1:xscreensaver-base-5.12-13.fc15.x86_64
> Mar 22 13:14:08 Updated: gnome-disk-utility-libs-2.91.7-1.fc15.x86_64
> Mar 22 13:14:11 Updated: gvfs-1.7.3-1.fc15.x86_64
> Mar 22 13:14:12 Updated: upower-0.9.9-1.fc15.x86_64
> Mar 22 13:14:13 Updated: totem-pl-parser-2.32.4-1.fc15.x86_64
> Mar 22 13:14:13 Updated: gnome-disk-utility-ui-libs-2.91.7-1.fc15.x86_64
> Mar 22 13:14:14 Updated: 1:xscreensaver-extras-base-5.12-13.fc15.x86_64
> Mar 22 13:14:15 Updated: 1:xscreensaver-extras-5.12-13.fc15.x86_64
> Mar 22 13:14:15 Updated: libtiff-3.9.4-4.fc15.x86_64
> Mar 22 13:14:16 Updated: gstreamer-tools-0.10.32-4.fc15.x86_64
> Mar 22 13:14:17 Updated: gstreamer-0.10.32-4.fc15.x86_64
> Mar 22 13:14:17 Updated: lovelock-backgrounds-single-14.91.0-1.fc15.noarch
> Mar 22 13:14:18 Updated: gnome-disk-utility-2.91.7-1.fc15.x86_64
> Mar 22 13:14:19 Updated: gvfs-obexftp-1.7.3-1.fc15.x86_64
> Mar 22 13:14:19 Updated: gvfs-fuse-1.7.3-1.fc15.x86_64
> Mar 22 13:14:21 Updated: 1:totem-2.91.92-1.fc15.x86_64
> Mar 22 13:14:21 Updated: 1:xscreensaver-gl-base-5.12-13.fc15.x86_64
> Mar 22 13:14:22 Updated: 1:xscreensaver-gl-extras-5.12-13.fc15.x86_64
> Mar 22 13:14:23 Updated: 1:gnome-utils-libs-2.91.91-1.fc15.x86_64
> Mar 22 13:14:23 Updated: adwaita-gtk3-theme-2.91.92-1.fc15.x86_64
> Mar 22 13:14:24 Updated: gnome-keyring-2.91.93-1.fc15.x86_64
> Mar 22 13:14:26 Updated: 1:gnome-bluetooth-libs-2.91.92-1.fc15.x86_64
> Mar 22 13:14:28 Updated: glib2-devel-2.28.4-1.fc15.x86_64
> Mar 22 13:14:28 Updated: libgomp-4.6.0-0.15.fc15.x86_64
> Mar 22 13:14:31 Updated: cpp-4.6.0-0.15.fc15.x86_64
> Mar 22 13:14:31 Updated: libquadmath-4.6.0-0.15.fc15.x86_64
> Mar 22 13:14:31 Updated: lovelock-backgrounds-gnome-14.91.0-1.fc15.noarch
> Mar 22 13:14:32 Updated: libXi-devel-1.4.2-1.fc15.x86_64
> Mar 22 13:14:33 Updated: libstdc++-devel-4.6.0-0.15.fc15.x86_64
> Mar 22 13:14:35 Updated: gsettings-desktop-schemas-2.91.92-1.fc15.noarch
> Mar 22 13:14:36 Updated: glibc-headers-2.13.90-7.x86_64
> Mar 22 13:14:37 Updated: glibc-devel-2.13.90-7.x86_64
> Mar 22 13:14:39 Updated: gcc-4.6.0-0.15.fc15.x86_64
> Mar 22 13:14:40 Updated: 1:quota-nls-4.00-0.10.pre1.fc15.noarch
> Mar 22 13:14:40 Updated: adwaita-gtk2-theme-2.91.92-1.fc15.x86_64
> Mar 22 13:14:40 Updated: thai-scalable-fonts-common-0.4.15-2.fc15.noarch
> Mar 22 13:14:41 Updated: adwaita-cursor-theme-2.91.92-1.fc15.x86_64
> Mar 22 13:14:41 Updated: 1:quota-4.00-0.10.pre1.fc15.x86_64
> Mar 22 13:14:43 Updated: gcc-c++-4.6.0-0.15.fc15.x86_64
> Mar 22 13:14:48 Updated: 1:gnome-utils-2.91.91-1.fc15.x86_64
> Mar 22 13:14:50 Updated: gtk3-devel-3.0.4-1.fc15.x86_64
> Mar 22 13:14:50 Updated: libgfortran-4.6.0-0.15.fc15.x86_64
> Mar 22 13:14:51 Updated: 1:gnome-bluetooth-2.91.92-1.fc15.x86_64
> Mar 22 13:14:51 Updated: gnome-keyring-pam-2.91.93-1.fc15.x86_64
> Mar 22 13:14:52 Updated: 1:totem-nautilus-2.91.92-1.fc15.x86_64
> Mar 22 13:14:53 Updated: gnome-disk-utility-nautilus-2.91.7-1.fc15.x86_64
> Mar 22 13:14:53 Updated: 1:totem-mozplugin-2.91.92-1.fc15.x86_64
> Mar 22 13:14:54 Updated: libdmapsharing-2.9.6-1.fc15.x86_64
> Mar 22 13:14:56 Updated: gnome-color-manager-2.91.92-1.fc15.x86_64
> Mar 22 13:14:57 Updated: libtiff-tools-3.9.4-4.fc15.x86_64
> Mar 22 13:15:06 Updated: gnome-packagekit-2.91.92-1.fc15.x86_64
> Mar 22 13:15:07 Updated: gnome-settings-daemon-2.91.92-1.fc15.x86_64
> Mar 22 13:15:11 Updated: gnome-power-manager-2.91.92-2.fc15.x86_64
> Mar 22 13:15:11 Updated: gvfs-gphoto2-1.7.3-1.fc15.x86_64
> Mar 22 13:15:12 Updated: gvfs-archive-1.7.3-1.fc15.x86_64
> Mar 22 13:15:12 Updated: gvfs-smb-1.7.3-1.fc15.x86_64
> Mar 22 13:15:12 Updated: gvfs-afc-1.7.3-1.fc15.x86_64
> Mar 22 13:15:15 Updated: gcalctool-5.91.92-1.x86_6

Re: After most recent F15 updates, gnome-shell does no more display all menu icons

2011-03-22 Thread Richard Hughes 
On 22 March 2011 12:31, Joachim Backes  wrote:
> After taday having updated my system, I miss some icons in the
> activities bar (for example gmone-terminal), and in
> Activities->Applications: The icons are lost, only the icon identifier
> is visible, but not the icon itself. That is valid for a lot of
> applications, for example "CD/DVD creator" or "Calculator". And much more.

See https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnome-settings-daemon-2.91.92-1.fc15

Basically we need a gnome-desktop3-2.91.92 in updates-testing so gsd can start.

Richard.
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: blind committer?

2011-03-22 Thread Martin Sourada 
On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 07:35:33 -0500 
Brian Millett wrote:

 
> GLib-GIO-ERROR **: Settings schema 'org.gnome.desktop.background' does
> not contain a key named 'picture-filename'
> aborting...
> 
Change done in gsettings-desktop-schemas (uses now picture-uri) but not
in gnome-desktop3 and control center. Either downgrade the first one to
2.91.91 or wait till the other two are upgraded to 2.91.92. Or at least
that's what I think is the core of the problem.

Martin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: optimizing systemd, was: f15 no longer starts

2011-03-22 Thread Michał Piotrowski 
2011/3/22 cornel panceac :
> alright adam but, what do you think can be done to prevent such a think
> happen again? it is possible to change/reconfigure systemd in such a way
> that a failing service will not just keep the system from booting?

This is not about any other service - this situation will not occur in
the case of for example httpd. It's about service that is considered
as essential for system boot, but in reality it is not essential.

> --
> "The end is important in all things."
>  -- Yamamoto Tsunetomo  / Hagakure / Ghost Dog: The Way of the Samurai
> "The beginning is the most important part of the work."
>   --  Plato
>
>
>
> --
> test mailing list
> test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
>



-- 
Best regards,
Michal

http://eventhorizon.pl/
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: After most recent update

2011-03-22 Thread Martin Sourada 
On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 06:36:15 -0600 
Lawrence E Graves wrote:

> I had the same problems.  No background.  Everthing works ok just no
> background.
> 
What versions of the following components do you have (if you have
them installed)?

gnome-desktop3
control-center
gsettings-desktop-schemas
desktop-backgrounds-gnome

I suspect a change in how wallpaper is set between 2.91.91 and 2.91.92
of the first three which however has been propagated only to
gsettings-desktop-schemas so far in fedora.

Martin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: optimizing systemd, was: f15 no longer starts

2011-03-22 Thread cornel panceac 
alright adam but, what do you think can be done to prevent such a think
happen again? it is possible to change/reconfigure systemd in such a way
that a failing service will not just keep the system from booting?

-- 
"The end is important in all things."
 -- *Yamamoto Tsunetomo*  / *Hagakure* / *Ghost Dog: The Way of the Samurai*
"The beginning is the most important part of the work."
  --  *Plato
*
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: After most recent update

2011-03-22 Thread Joachim Backes 
On 03/22/2011 01:36 PM, Lawrence E Graves wrote:
> I had the same problems.  No background.  Everthing works ok just no
> background.
> 

I filed a BZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689779

-- 
Joachim Backes 

http://www.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

After most recent update

2011-03-22 Thread Lawrence E Graves 
I had the same problems.  No background.  Everthing works ok just no
background.

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

blind committer?

2011-03-22 Thread Brian Millett 
After the yum updates this am, gnome comes up as a dark screen with orca
speaking in the background.  I'm not blind, nor have I ever enabled
orca.

In my .xsession-errors file there is

Gtk-ERROR **: GTK+ 2.x symbols detected. Using GTK+ 2.x and GTK+ 3 in
the same process is not supported
aborting...

GLib-GIO-ERROR **: Settings schema 'org.gnome.desktop.background' does
not contain a key named 'picture-filename'
aborting...

Am digging deeper to see what it is.  Anyone have hints?

Thanks.
-- 
Brian Millett - [ Londo, "The Gathering"]
"My god, man. We've become a tourist attraction. See the great Centauri
 Republic. Open 9 to 5, Earth time."



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

After most recent F15 updates, gnome-shell does no more display all menu icons

2011-03-22 Thread Joachim Backes 
After taday having updated my system, I miss some icons in the
activities bar (for example gmone-terminal), and in
Activities->Applications: The icons are lost, only the icon identifier
is visible, but not the icon itself. That is valid for a lot of
applications, for example "CD/DVD creator" or "Calculator". And much more.

Anybody sees this too?

List of updated packages:

Mar 22 13:13:43 Updated: libgcc-4.6.0-0.15.fc15.x86_64
Mar 22 13:13:53 Updated: glibc-common-2.13.90-7.x86_64
Mar 22 13:13:56 Updated: glibc-2.13.90-7.x86_64
Mar 22 13:14:00 Updated: glib2-2.28.4-1.fc15.x86_64
Mar 22 13:14:01 Updated: libgnome-keyring-2.91.93-1.fc15.x86_64
Mar 22 13:14:02 Updated: libnotify-0.7.2-1.fc15.x86_64
Mar 22 13:14:02 Updated: libstdc++-4.6.0-0.15.fc15.x86_64
Mar 22 13:14:03 Updated: libXi-1.4.2-1.fc15.x86_64
Mar 22 13:14:05 Updated: gtk3-3.0.4-1.fc15.x86_64
Mar 22 13:14:07 Updated: 1:xscreensaver-base-5.12-13.fc15.x86_64
Mar 22 13:14:08 Updated: gnome-disk-utility-libs-2.91.7-1.fc15.x86_64
Mar 22 13:14:11 Updated: gvfs-1.7.3-1.fc15.x86_64
Mar 22 13:14:12 Updated: upower-0.9.9-1.fc15.x86_64
Mar 22 13:14:13 Updated: totem-pl-parser-2.32.4-1.fc15.x86_64
Mar 22 13:14:13 Updated: gnome-disk-utility-ui-libs-2.91.7-1.fc15.x86_64
Mar 22 13:14:14 Updated: 1:xscreensaver-extras-base-5.12-13.fc15.x86_64
Mar 22 13:14:15 Updated: 1:xscreensaver-extras-5.12-13.fc15.x86_64
Mar 22 13:14:15 Updated: libtiff-3.9.4-4.fc15.x86_64
Mar 22 13:14:16 Updated: gstreamer-tools-0.10.32-4.fc15.x86_64
Mar 22 13:14:17 Updated: gstreamer-0.10.32-4.fc15.x86_64
Mar 22 13:14:17 Updated: lovelock-backgrounds-single-14.91.0-1.fc15.noarch
Mar 22 13:14:18 Updated: gnome-disk-utility-2.91.7-1.fc15.x86_64
Mar 22 13:14:19 Updated: gvfs-obexftp-1.7.3-1.fc15.x86_64
Mar 22 13:14:19 Updated: gvfs-fuse-1.7.3-1.fc15.x86_64
Mar 22 13:14:21 Updated: 1:totem-2.91.92-1.fc15.x86_64
Mar 22 13:14:21 Updated: 1:xscreensaver-gl-base-5.12-13.fc15.x86_64
Mar 22 13:14:22 Updated: 1:xscreensaver-gl-extras-5.12-13.fc15.x86_64
Mar 22 13:14:23 Updated: 1:gnome-utils-libs-2.91.91-1.fc15.x86_64
Mar 22 13:14:23 Updated: adwaita-gtk3-theme-2.91.92-1.fc15.x86_64
Mar 22 13:14:24 Updated: gnome-keyring-2.91.93-1.fc15.x86_64
Mar 22 13:14:26 Updated: 1:gnome-bluetooth-libs-2.91.92-1.fc15.x86_64
Mar 22 13:14:28 Updated: glib2-devel-2.28.4-1.fc15.x86_64
Mar 22 13:14:28 Updated: libgomp-4.6.0-0.15.fc15.x86_64
Mar 22 13:14:31 Updated: cpp-4.6.0-0.15.fc15.x86_64
Mar 22 13:14:31 Updated: libquadmath-4.6.0-0.15.fc15.x86_64
Mar 22 13:14:31 Updated: lovelock-backgrounds-gnome-14.91.0-1.fc15.noarch
Mar 22 13:14:32 Updated: libXi-devel-1.4.2-1.fc15.x86_64
Mar 22 13:14:33 Updated: libstdc++-devel-4.6.0-0.15.fc15.x86_64
Mar 22 13:14:35 Updated: gsettings-desktop-schemas-2.91.92-1.fc15.noarch
Mar 22 13:14:36 Updated: glibc-headers-2.13.90-7.x86_64
Mar 22 13:14:37 Updated: glibc-devel-2.13.90-7.x86_64
Mar 22 13:14:39 Updated: gcc-4.6.0-0.15.fc15.x86_64
Mar 22 13:14:40 Updated: 1:quota-nls-4.00-0.10.pre1.fc15.noarch
Mar 22 13:14:40 Updated: adwaita-gtk2-theme-2.91.92-1.fc15.x86_64
Mar 22 13:14:40 Updated: thai-scalable-fonts-common-0.4.15-2.fc15.noarch
Mar 22 13:14:41 Updated: adwaita-cursor-theme-2.91.92-1.fc15.x86_64
Mar 22 13:14:41 Updated: 1:quota-4.00-0.10.pre1.fc15.x86_64
Mar 22 13:14:43 Updated: gcc-c++-4.6.0-0.15.fc15.x86_64
Mar 22 13:14:48 Updated: 1:gnome-utils-2.91.91-1.fc15.x86_64
Mar 22 13:14:50 Updated: gtk3-devel-3.0.4-1.fc15.x86_64
Mar 22 13:14:50 Updated: libgfortran-4.6.0-0.15.fc15.x86_64
Mar 22 13:14:51 Updated: 1:gnome-bluetooth-2.91.92-1.fc15.x86_64
Mar 22 13:14:51 Updated: gnome-keyring-pam-2.91.93-1.fc15.x86_64
Mar 22 13:14:52 Updated: 1:totem-nautilus-2.91.92-1.fc15.x86_64
Mar 22 13:14:53 Updated: gnome-disk-utility-nautilus-2.91.7-1.fc15.x86_64
Mar 22 13:14:53 Updated: 1:totem-mozplugin-2.91.92-1.fc15.x86_64
Mar 22 13:14:54 Updated: libdmapsharing-2.9.6-1.fc15.x86_64
Mar 22 13:14:56 Updated: gnome-color-manager-2.91.92-1.fc15.x86_64
Mar 22 13:14:57 Updated: libtiff-tools-3.9.4-4.fc15.x86_64
Mar 22 13:15:06 Updated: gnome-packagekit-2.91.92-1.fc15.x86_64
Mar 22 13:15:07 Updated: gnome-settings-daemon-2.91.92-1.fc15.x86_64
Mar 22 13:15:11 Updated: gnome-power-manager-2.91.92-2.fc15.x86_64
Mar 22 13:15:11 Updated: gvfs-gphoto2-1.7.3-1.fc15.x86_64
Mar 22 13:15:12 Updated: gvfs-archive-1.7.3-1.fc15.x86_64
Mar 22 13:15:12 Updated: gvfs-smb-1.7.3-1.fc15.x86_64
Mar 22 13:15:12 Updated: gvfs-afc-1.7.3-1.fc15.x86_64
Mar 22 13:15:15 Updated: gcalctool-5.91.92-1.x86_64
Mar 22 13:15:16 Updated: mousetweaks-2.91.92-1.fc15.x86_64
Mar 22 13:15:17 Updated: gtk3-immodule-xim-3.0.4-1.fc15.x86_64
Mar 22 13:15:22 Updated: libgcj-4.6.0-0.15.fc15.x86_64
Mar 22 13:15:23 Updated: clutter-1.6.10-1.fc15.x86_64
Mar 22 13:15:24 Updated: logrotate-3.7.9-8.fc15.x86_64
Mar 22 13:15:24 Updated: libnl-1.1-14.fc15.x86_64
Mar 22 13:15:25 Updated: 2:ethtool-2.6.38-1.fc15.x86_64
Mar 22 13:15:26 Updated: gnome-themes-standard-2.9backes@eule
[SYSTEM_BACKUP]:1.92-1.fc15.x86_64
Mar 22 13:15:27 Updated: thai-scalabl

Re: F15 - anaconda + lorax karma needed

2011-03-22 Thread James Laska 
On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 21:52 -0400, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> On 03/21/2011 07:02 PM, James Laska wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 16:11 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> >> Greetings folks,
> >>
> >> As mentioned during the QA meeting today, I promised to provide
> >> custom-built boot.iso (x86_64) so folks can add some bodhi karma for two
> >> important updates.  The following updates are needed in order to proceed
> >> with building Beta TC and RC milestones.
> >>
> >>* https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/anaconda-15.24-1.fc15
> >>* https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lorax-0.3.2-1.fc15
> >>
> >> The x86_64 boot.iso is available from
> >> http://jlaska.fedorapeople.org/boot.iso.  Alternatively, you can provide
> >> anaconda karma feedback by updating to the latest anaconda on an
> >> existing live image.
> >
> > Updated x86_64 boot.iso is now available.  Apologies for the delay.
> >
> > # sha256sum boot.iso
> > 486c22fbb850d27c73a120d76e085808199b9cdac4db64c7b90959fb62559e97
> > boot.iso
> >
> > Thanks,
> > James
> >
> 
> Get as far as bz 684383.

Thanks for the feedback Clyde!  The bug you mention(682543) is still a
known failure and not intended to be resolved in this particular update.
IMO, it's appropriate to provide positive karma since you can now at
least hit that failure again.

Thanks,
James




signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: [Fedora QA] #172: Printing test day

2011-03-22 Thread Fedora QA 
#172: Printing test day
---+
  Reporter:  twaugh|   Owner:  johannbg 
  Type:  task  |  Status:  assigned 
  Priority:  major |   Milestone:  Fedora 15
 Component:  Test Day  | Version:   
Resolution:|Keywords:   
---+
Comment (by twaugh):

 I'm prepping for this today and hope to announce it this afternoon.

-- 
Ticket URL: 
Fedora QA 
Fedora Quality Assurance
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: [Fedora QA] #170: Request for F15 Power Management test day

2011-03-22 Thread Fedora QA 
#170: Request for F15 Power Management test day
---+
  Reporter:  jskarvad  |   Owner: 
  Type:  defect|  Status:  new
  Priority:  major |   Milestone: 
 Component:  Test Day  | Version: 
Resolution:|Keywords: 
---+
Comment (by jskarvad):

 Thanks, please post to mailing list. I am still working on the LiveCD, I
 will notify about the progress.

-- 
Ticket URL: 
Fedora QA 
Fedora Quality Assurance
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

blank screen but works...

2011-03-22 Thread Rob Healey 
Good evening:

I would like to report that I am having a new problem for me at least!

I did a new install of F15-Alpha-Live x86_64 Gnome and once the install was
complete, I rebooted...

I get a black screen with the gnome shell panel bars.  I can get into my
activities/ windows screen, but it is completely black as well!  I can get
into the applications, but if they are a black item, it is not shown...

For example in my Favorites, I have Firefox and gnome-terminal...
I can see firefox, but terminal icon is invisible...  If I take my mouse to
where terminal is suppsoe to and click, it will start the terminal
program...

It is just a minor visual issue, but it is very important as I am legally
blind and I need to be able to see...

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Rob G. Healey

"Always surround yourself with people that inspire you to
greatness!"
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test