No sound with kernel-3.1.0-0.rc2.git7.2.fc16.x86_64 in F16!
Hi, after having updated to kernel-3.1.0-0.rc2.git7.2.fc16.x86_64, missing sound! Sound OK with kernel-3.0.1-3.fc16.x86_64! Audio: 00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation N10/ICH 7 Family High Definition Audio Controller (rev 01) Loaded sound odules with running kernel-3.1.0-0.rc2.git7.2.fc16.x86_64: lsmod|grep snd snd_hda_codec_realtek 326581 1 snd_hda_intel 28992 2 snd_hda_codec 90192 2 snd_hda_codec_realtek,snd_hda_intel snd_hwdep 13556 1 snd_hda_codec snd_seq57180 0 snd_seq_device 14173 1 snd_seq snd_pcm85204 2 snd_hda_intel,snd_hda_codec snd_timer 24996 2 snd_seq,snd_pcm snd70700 12 snd_hda_codec_realtek,snd_hda_intel,snd_hda_codec,snd_hwdep,snd_seq,snd_seq_device,snd_pcm,snd_timer soundcore 14523 1 snd snd_page_alloc 14039 2 snd_hda_intel,snd_pcm -- Joachim Backes joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de http://www.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
gvfs-gdu-volume running at 98% cpu
Should we expect this in rawhide? Runs for 15 minutes like this. TIA -- Regards, OldFart -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: gvfs-gdu-volume running at 98% cpu
On 23 August 2011 15:43, Clyde E. Kunkel clydekunkel7...@cox.net wrote: Should we expect this in rawhide? Runs for 15 minutes like this. No, file a bug. :-) Richard. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Fedora QA] #234: Fedora Packager for Eclipse F16 test day.
#234: Fedora Packager for Eclipse F16 test day. ---+ Reporter: arobinso | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 16 Component: Test Day | Version: Resolution:|Keywords: ---+ Comment (by arobinso): This is a general test to ensure everything is okay for the release, including regression testing and testing of new capabilities (e.g. importing SRPMs). We have plans for hosting it ourselves. -- Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/234#comment:2 Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa Fedora Quality Assurance -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
where is my aisleriot-solitaire in F16
Because of some reasons, *aisleriot-solitaire* from gnome-games was lost. Somebody can help? Reinstall of gnome-games does'nt re-install it:-( Kind regards Joachim Backes joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de http://www.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
F-16 Branched report: 20110823 changes
Compose started at Tue Aug 23 13:15:24 UTC 2011 Broken deps for x86_64 -- 389-ds-base-1.2.9.0-1.fc16.2.x86_64 requires libnetsnmpagent.so.25()(64bit) 389-ds-base-1.2.9.0-1.fc16.2.x86_64 requires libnetsnmpmibs.so.25()(64bit) 389-ds-base-1.2.9.0-1.fc16.2.x86_64 requires libnetsnmp.so.25()(64bit) OpenImageIO-0.10.1-2.fc15.i686 requires libboost_program_options-mt.so.1.46.0 OpenImageIO-0.10.1-2.fc15.i686 requires libboost_thread-mt.so.1.46.0 OpenImageIO-0.10.1-2.fc15.i686 requires libboost_python-mt.so.1.46.0 OpenImageIO-0.10.1-2.fc15.i686 requires libboost_system-mt.so.1.46.0 OpenImageIO-0.10.1-2.fc15.i686 requires libGLEW.so.1.5 OpenImageIO-0.10.1-2.fc15.i686 requires libboost_regex-mt.so.1.46.0 OpenImageIO-0.10.1-2.fc15.i686 requires libboost_filesystem-mt.so.1.46.0 OpenImageIO-0.10.1-2.fc15.x86_64 requires libboost_regex-mt.so.1.46.0()(64bit) OpenImageIO-0.10.1-2.fc15.x86_64 requires libboost_filesystem-mt.so.1.46.0()(64bit) OpenImageIO-0.10.1-2.fc15.x86_64 requires libboost_program_options-mt.so.1.46.0()(64bit) OpenImageIO-0.10.1-2.fc15.x86_64 requires libboost_system-mt.so.1.46.0()(64bit) OpenImageIO-0.10.1-2.fc15.x86_64 requires libGLEW.so.1.5()(64bit) OpenImageIO-0.10.1-2.fc15.x86_64 requires libboost_python-mt.so.1.46.0()(64bit) OpenImageIO-0.10.1-2.fc15.x86_64 requires libboost_thread-mt.so.1.46.0()(64bit) acheck-0.5.1-4.fc15.noarch requires perl(Text::Aspell) almanah-0.7.3-12.fc16.x86_64 requires libcamel-1.2.so.26()(64bit) almanah-0.7.3-12.fc16.x86_64 requires libedataserverui-3.0.so.0()(64bit) almanah-0.7.3-12.fc16.x86_64 requires libcryptui.so.0()(64bit) assogiate-0.2.1-5.fc15.x86_64 requires libgnomevfsmm-2.6.so.1()(64bit) bibletime-2.8.1-1.fc16.x86_64 requires libclucene.so.0()(64bit) claws-mail-plugins-geolocation-3.7.9-7.fc16.x86_64 requires libcogl.so.1()(64bit) cluster-snmp-0.18.7-1.fc16.x86_64 requires libnetsnmp.so.25()(64bit) coda-backup-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libse.so.5()(64bit) coda-backup-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires librpc2.so.5()(64bit) coda-backup-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires liblwp.so.2()(64bit) coda-client-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libseglwp.so.1()(64bit) coda-client-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires librvmlwp.so.1()(64bit) coda-client-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libse.so.5()(64bit) coda-client-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires librpc2.so.5()(64bit) coda-client-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires liblwp.so.2()(64bit) coda-client-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires librdslwp.so.1()(64bit) coda-server-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires rvm-tools coda-server-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libseglwp.so.1()(64bit) coda-server-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires librvmlwp.so.1()(64bit) coda-server-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libse.so.5()(64bit) coda-server-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires librpc2.so.5()(64bit) coda-server-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires liblwp.so.2()(64bit) coda-server-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires librdslwp.so.1()(64bit) comoonics-cdsl-py-0.2-18.noarch requires comoonics-base-py comoonics-cluster-py-0.1-24.noarch requires comoonics-base-py contextkit-0.5.15-2.fc15.i686 requires libcdb.so.1 contextkit-0.5.15-2.fc15.x86_64 requires libcdb.so.1()(64bit) deskbar-applet-2.32.0-4.fc15.x86_64 requires libebook-1.2.so.10()(64bit) deskbar-applet-2.32.0-4.fc15.x86_64 requires gnome-python2-applet deskbar-applet-2.32.0-4.fc15.x86_64 requires libcamel-1.2.so.23()(64bit) dh-make-0.55-3.fc15.noarch requires debhelper emacs-spice-mode-1.2.25-5.fc15.noarch requires gwave emerillon-0.1.2-17.fc16.x86_64 requires libethos-ui-1.0.so.0()(64bit) emerillon-0.1.2-17.fc16.x86_64 requires libethos-1.0.so.0()(64bit) evolution-mapi-3.1.3-1.fc16.i686 requires libcamel-1.2.so.27 evolution-mapi-3.1.3-1.fc16.i686 requires libcamel-provider-1.2.so.27 evolution-mapi-3.1.3-1.fc16.x86_64 requires libcamel-provider-1.2.so.27()(64bit) evolution-mapi-3.1.3-1.fc16.x86_64 requires libcamel-1.2.so.27()(64bit) exaile-0.3.2.1-1.fc16.noarch requires hal fawkes-guis-0.4.2-4.fc16.i686 requires libgvc.so.5 fawkes-guis-0.4.2-4.fc16.i686 requires libcdt.so.4 fawkes-guis-0.4.2-4.fc16.i686 requires libgraph.so.4 fawkes-guis-0.4.2-4.fc16.x86_64 requires libgvc.so.5()(64bit) fawkes-guis-0.4.2-4.fc16.x86_64 requires libcdt.so.4()(64bit) fawkes-guis-0.4.2-4.fc16.x86_64 requires libgraph.so.4()(64bit) fawkes-plugin-player-0.4.2-4.fc16.x86_64 requires libboost_signals-mt.so.1.46.1()(64bit) fawkes-plugin-player-0.4.2-4.fc16.x86_64 requires libboost_thread-mt.so.1.46.1()(64bit)
Re: F16 Update Kernels fail to boot
On Mon, 2011-08-22 at 17:01 -0400, Andy Lawrence wrote: So far all update kernels on F16 (installed from F16rc5) have failed to boot. The installation DVD kernel 3.0.0-1.fc16.x86_64 is the only one that boots. I've attempted to boot with these with no luck: kernel-3.0.0-1.fc16.x86_64 kernel-3.0.1-3.fc16.x86_64 I removed quiet from the boot string and get no output for either kernel except this in yellow letters in the top left of the screen: Trying to allocate 1059 pages for VMLINUZ Got pages at 0x02826000 [Linux-EFI, setup=0x10b9, size 0x422b90] I haven't filed a bug report yet, hate to file one that simply says its broke! Anything else I can do to provide any output or help? This is a Sandybridge, UEFI, SDD box. Seems the same problem as I filed bug BZ #730124 for. I needed to switch to grub2 to get my system booting. Can you confirm you are still on grub1? Have to tried with kernel 3.1.0? -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: where is my aisleriot-solitaire in F16
Not yet present. However, the OpenSuSE has an rpm for aisleriot-3.1.0 I had to force installation due to the lack of a glib2-tools package in F16, but my card games appear to be back -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
[Fedora QA] #235: request: add tests for new grub2 stage2 device types
#235: request: add tests for new grub2 stage2 device types -+-- Reporter: dlehman | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: major| Milestone: Component: Proventester Mentor Request | Version: Keywords: | -+-- = phenomenon = GRUB2 supports several new md raid levels (0,4,5,6,10) and also lvm logical volumes as the /boot device. It would be nice to get some testing coverage for this, including combinations like root on lvm (no separate /boot) w/ md raid pvs. -- Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/235 Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa Fedora Quality Assurance -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Fedora 15 updates-testing report
The following Fedora 15 Security updates need testing: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ecryptfs-utils-90-1.fc15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cups-1.4.8-2.fc15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pl-5.10.2-4.fc15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xen-4.1.1-3.fc15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/apache-commons-daemon-1.0.7-1.fc15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-libpng-1.4.8-1.fc15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libvpx-0.9.7.1-1.fc15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dhcp-4.2.1-10.P1.fc15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/foomatic-4.0.8-3.fc15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/hplip-3.11.7-2.fc15 The following Fedora 15 Critical Path updates have yet to be approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/hwdata-0.234-1.fc15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libXi-1.4.3-2.fc15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gdb-7.3-43.fc15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gdb-7.3-42.fc15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libtalloc-2.0.6-1.fc15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sendmail-8.14.5-3.fc15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nspr-4.8.8-4.fc15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nss-softokn-3.12.10-4.fc15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mash-0.5.22-1.fc15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xorg-x11-drv-openchrome-0.2.904-14.fc15.1 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lldpad-0.9.41-3.fc15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libfprint-0.4.0-1.fc15,fprintd-0.4.1-1.fc15 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora 15 updates-testing E-1.4-1.fc15 freemind-0.9.0-5.fc15 gyp-0.1-0.6.1010svn.fc15 perl-Hash-FieldHash-0.10-2.fc15 retrace-server-1.3-1.fc15 rubygem-aws-sdk-1.1.1-1.fc15 rubygem-rhc-0.75.9-1.fc15 system-config-date-1.9.64-1.fc15 system-config-samba-1.2.93-1.fc15 system-config-services-0.101.7-1.fc15 system-config-users-1.2.110-1.fc15 xorg-x11-proto-devel-7.6-12.fc15 zanata-python-client-1.3.0-1.fc15 Details about builds: E-1.4-1.fc15 (FEDORA-2011-11404) Equational Theorem Prover Update Information: This update brings the following changes: * Adapted e_ltb_runner for CASC-23 * Various minor fixes, in particular to proof and answer output * New literal selection function * New auto-mode ChangeLog: * Mon Aug 22 2011 Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com - 1.4-1 - New upstream release - Rebuild man pages with newer version of help2man - Use the Makefile's install target instead of rolling our own freemind-0.9.0-5.fc15 (FEDORA-2011-11396) Free mind mapping software Update Information: - fixes bug #729487 when the already present configs in ~/.freemind are removed prior to installation or update ChangeLog: * Sat Jul 23 2011 Johannes Lips Johannes.Lips googlemail com 0.9.0-5 - Fix bug #729487 by setting gtk+ lookandfeel by default References: [ 1 ] Bug #729487 - Freemind doesn't escape properly https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729487 gyp-0.1-0.6.1010svn.fc15 (FEDORA-2011-11397) Generate Your Projects Update Information: * rebase to r1010 ChangeLog: * Tue Aug 23 2011 Akira TAGOH ta...@redhat.com - 0.1-0.6.1010svn - Rebase to r1010. perl-Hash-FieldHash-0.10-2.fc15 (FEDORA-2011-11388) Lightweight field hash implementation Update Information: New package - perl-Hash-FieldHash References: [ 1 ] Bug #730047 - Review Request: perl-Hash-FieldHash - Lightweight field hash implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730047
Fedora 14 updates-testing report
The following Fedora 14 Security updates need testing: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cups-1.4.8-2.fc14 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ecryptfs-utils-90-1.fc14 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/freetype-2.4.2-5.fc14 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pl-5.7.11-6.fc14 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/system-config-firewall-1.2.27-2.fc14 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libsndfile-1.0.25-1.fc14 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-libpng-1.4.8-1.fc14 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libcap-2.22-1.fc14 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libvpx-0.9.7.1-1.fc14 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dhcp-4.2.0-23.P2.fc14 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libsoup-2.32.2-2.fc14 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/foomatic-4.0.8-3.fc14 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/hplip-3.11.7-2.fc14 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tomcat6-6.0.26-21.fc14 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openldap-2.4.23-10.fc14 The following Fedora 14 Critical Path updates have yet to be approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/setup-2.8.28-2.fc14 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/system-config-date-1.9.64-1.fc14 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/curl-7.21.0-10.fc14 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/audit-2.1.3-1.fc14 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/system-config-users-1.2.110-1.fc14 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libcap-2.22-1.fc14 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ModemManager-0.4.998-1.git20110706.fc14 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/unique-1.1.6-3.fc14 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xorg-x11-drv-savage-2.3.2-3.fc14 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mash-0.5.22-1.fc14 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-5.12.4-146.fc14 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/policycoreutils-2.0.85-30.2.fc14 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xorg-x11-drv-openchrome-0.2.904-8.fc14.2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xorg-x11-drv-qxl-0.0.21-3.fc14 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xorg-x11-drv-nouveau-0.0.16-14.20101010git8c8f15c.fc14 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libconcord-0.23-5.fc14,udev-161-9.fc14,concordance-0.23-2.fc14 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openldap-2.4.23-10.fc14 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora 14 updates-testing freemind-0.9.0-4.fc14 gyp-0.1-0.6.1010svn.fc14 perl-Hash-FieldHash-0.10-2.fc14 rubygem-aws-sdk-1.1.1-1.fc14 rubygem-rhc-0.75.9-1.fc14 setup-2.8.28-2.fc14 system-config-date-1.9.64-1.fc14 system-config-samba-1.2.93-1.fc14 system-config-users-1.2.110-1.fc14 zanata-python-client-1.3.0-1.fc14 Details about builds: freemind-0.9.0-4.fc14 (FEDORA-2011-11399) Free mind mapping software Update Information: - fixes bug #729487 when the already present configs in ~/.freemind are removed prior to installation or update ChangeLog: * Sat Jul 23 2011 Johannes Lips Johannes.Lips googlemail com 0.9.0-4 - Fix bug #729487 by setting gtk+ lookandfeel by default References: [ 1 ] Bug #729487 - Freemind doesn't escape properly https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729487 gyp-0.1-0.6.1010svn.fc14 (FEDORA-2011-11390) Generate Your Projects Update Information: * rebase to r1010. ChangeLog: * Tue Aug 23 2011 Akira TAGOH ta...@redhat.com - 0.1-0.6.1010svn - Rebase to r1010. * Wed Feb 9 2011 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org - 0.1-0.5.840svn - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_15_Mass_Rebuild perl-Hash-FieldHash-0.10-2.fc14 (FEDORA-2011-11394) Lightweight field hash implementation Update Information: New package - perl-Hash-FieldHash References: [ 1 ] Bug #730047 - Review Request: perl-Hash-FieldHash - Lightweight field hash implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730047
f16a?
was fedora 16 alpha announced somewhere? -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: f16a?
cornel panceac wrote: was fedora 16 alpha announced somewhere? Yes. It was announced on all of the announce mailing lists. You have to be subscribed to them to see the e-mail. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: f16a?
On Tue, 23 Aug 2011 21:53:01 +0300 cornel panceac cpanc...@gmail.com wrote: was fedora 16 alpha announced somewhere? Yes. http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/announce/2011-August/002992.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2011-August/000828.html The announce list one was stuck in moderation... it should be out now. kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: f16a?
2011/8/23 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com On Tue, 23 Aug 2011 21:53:01 +0300 cornel panceac cpanc...@gmail.com wrote: was fedora 16 alpha announced somewhere? Yes. http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/announce/2011-August/002992.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2011-August/000828.html The announce list one was stuck in moderation... it should be out now. kevin michael and kevin, thank you very much. i've finally received an announce email 20 minutes ago. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Fedora 16 updates-testing report
The following Fedora 16 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ecryptfs-utils-90-1.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cups-1.5.0-6.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pl-5.10.2-4.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-activesupport-3.0.10-1.fc16,rubygem-activemodel-3.0.10-1.fc16,rubygem-activerecord-3.0.10-1.fc16,rubygem-activeresource-3.0.10-1.fc16,rubygem-actionpack-3.0.10-1.fc16,rubygem-actionmailer-3.0.10-1.fc16,rubygem-railties-3.0.10-1.fc16,rubygem-rails-3.0.10-1.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libvpx-0.9.7.1-1.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tcptrack-1.4.2-1.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openarena-0.8.5-4.fc16,quake3-1.36-11.svn2102.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/thunderbird-6.0-1.fc16,xulrunner-6.0-1.fc16,firefox-6.0-1.fc16,mozvoikko-1.9.0-6.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/foomatic-4.0.8-4.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/hplip-3.11.7-2.fc16
The following Fedora 16 Critical Path updates have yet to be approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libffi-3.0.10-1.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/evolution-data-server-3.1.5-2.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pykickstart-1.99.3-1.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/checkpolicy-2.1.3-1.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/policycoreutils-2.1.4-1.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libsemanage-2.1.2-1.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libselinux-2.1.4-2.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/setup-2.8.36-2.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kernel-3.1.0-0.rc3.git0.0.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xorg-x11-drv-nouveau-0.0.16-27.20110720gitb806e3f.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/avahi-0.6.30-4.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dbus-1.4.10-3.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/hwdata-0.234-1.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pygobject2-2.28.6-2.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/system-config-date-1.9.64-1.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xorg-x11-drv-intel-2.16.0-1.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pm-utils-1.4.1-12.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libXi-1.4.3-2.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-threads-1.83-4.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pulseaudio-0.9.23-1.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libconfig-1.4.8-1.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/iso-codes-3.27.1-1.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mdadm-3.2.2-7.fc16
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora 16 updates-testing
checkpolicy-2.1.3-1.fc16
esteid-browser-plugin-1.3.0-2.fc16
evolution-data-server-3.1.5-2.fc16
fedora-easy-karma-0-0.13.20110823gitb0706146.fc16
glusterfs-3.2.3-1.fc16
hekafs-0.7-10.fc16
hekafs-0.7-9.fc16
ibus-1.3.99.20110419-18.fc16
kdebase-workspace-4.7.0-9.fc16
libffi-3.0.10-1.fc16
libselinux-2.1.4-2.fc16
libsemanage-2.1.2-1.fc16
libvirt-0.9.4-1.fc16
openstack-swift-1.4.0-2.fc16
perl-Digest-Perl-MD5-1.8-2.fc16
perl-Spreadsheet-ParseExcel-0.5900-1.fc16
policycoreutils-2.1.4-1.fc16
pykickstart-1.99.3-1.fc16
rubygem-rhc-0.75.9-1.fc16
seahorse-plugins-2.91.6-0.2.git1e35fd9.fc16
synce-connector-0.15.2-3.fc16
system-config-date-1.9.64-1.fc16
system-config-samba-1.2.93-1.fc16
system-config-services-0.101.7-1.fc16
system-config-users-1.2.110-1.fc16
tulrich-tuffy-fonts-1.27-1.fc16
wine-1.3.26-3.fc16
Details about builds:
checkpolicy-2.1.3-1.fc16 (FEDORA-2011-11421)
SELinux policy compiler
Update Information:
Update to upstream
ChangeLog:
* Thu Aug 18 2011 Dan Walsh dwa...@redhat.com - 2.1.3-0
* add missing ; to attribute_role_def
*Redo filename/filesystem syntax to support filename trans
* Wed Aug 3 2011 Dan Walsh dwa...@redhat.com - 2.1.2-0
-Update to upstream
* .gitignore changes
* dispol output of role trans
* man page update: build a module with an older policy version
* Thu Jul 28 2011 Dan Walsh dwa...@redhat.com - 2.1.1-0
-Update to upstream
* Minor updates to filename trans rule output in dis{mod,pol}
* Thu Jul 28 2011 Dan Walsh dwa...@redhat.com - 2.1.0-1
-Update to upstream
esteid-browser-plugin-1.3.0-2.fc16 (FEDORA-2011-11420)
Estonian ID card digital signing browser plugin
[Fedora QA] #236: No qa test for making sure that the boot.iso is hybridised
#236: No qa test for making sure that the boot.iso is hybridised +--- Reporter: ausil | Owner: adamw Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: Trac| Version: Keywords: | +--- = bug description = F-16 alpha shipped witha boot.iso that did not have isohybrid run on it, this means you can not just dd it to a usb drive and boot it. = bug analysis = slipped though as there was no test case = fix recommendation = lorax has been fixed, but we should make sure we cover it in testing. -- Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/236 Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa Fedora Quality Assurance -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Release criteria: kickstart
Hey, folks. So, another criteria discussion. It came up during Alpha that we're grievously lacking criteria to ensure kickstart installs work. So, we should kick that around a bit, I guess... kickstart is a very broad area; you can write extremely complex kickstart files that do a lot of stuff. So broadly what we'd need to do is define a subset of kickstart functionality that we expect to work, and then possibly divide that up by release phase (so some stuff must work by Beta, the rest by Final, for e.g.) anaconda devs following this list, do you have any existing expectations as to what level of kickstart functionality ought to be in place for releases, and when you think would be appropriate? So far it seems everyone more or less agrees that it should be possible to do at least a basic unattended kickstart install by Beta. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Release criteria: kickstart
On 08/23/2011 09:13 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: Hey, folks. So, another criteria discussion. It came up during Alpha that we're grievously lacking criteria to ensure kickstart installs work. So, we should kick that around a bit, I guess... kickstart is a very broad area; you can write extremely complex kickstart files that do a lot of stuff. So broadly what we'd need to do is define a subset of kickstart functionality that we expect to work, and then possibly divide that up by release phase (so some stuff must work by Beta, the rest by Final, for e.g.) anaconda devs following this list, do you have any existing expectations as to what level of kickstart functionality ought to be in place for releases, and when you think would be appropriate? So far it seems everyone more or less agrees that it should be possible to do at least a basic unattended kickstart install by Beta. For the love of all that is holy do not tie that into the alpha criteria... JBG -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Fedora QA] #236: No qa test for making sure that the boot.iso is hybridised
#236: No qa test for making sure that the boot.iso is hybridised -+-- Reporter: ausil | Owner: adamw Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: Trac| Version: Resolution: |Keywords: -+-- Comment (by adamwill): Sure, sounds good. Do you think there should be a release criterion for this - i.e. should it be required to be working? for Alpha, Beta, Final...? -- Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/236#comment:1 Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa Fedora Quality Assurance -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Fedora QA] #236: No qa test for making sure that the boot.iso is hybridised
#236: No qa test for making sure that the boot.iso is hybridised -+-- Reporter: ausil | Owner: adamw Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: Trac| Version: Resolution: |Keywords: -+-- Changes (by robatino): * cc: robatino (added) -- Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/236#comment:2 Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa Fedora Quality Assurance -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Fedora QA] #236: No qa test for making sure that the boot.iso is hybridised
#236: No qa test for making sure that the boot.iso is hybridised -+-- Reporter: ausil | Owner: adamw Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: Trac| Version: Resolution: |Keywords: -+-- Comment (by ausil): it should be alpha, its a supported method of installing. it should always work. -- Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/236#comment:3 Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa Fedora Quality Assurance -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: F16 Update Kernels fail to boot
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Jurgen Kramer gtmkra...@xs4all.nl wrote: On Mon, 2011-08-22 at 17:01 -0400, Andy Lawrence wrote: So far all update kernels on F16 (installed from F16rc5) have failed to boot. The installation DVD kernel 3.0.0-1.fc16.x86_64 is the only one that boots. I've attempted to boot with these with no luck: kernel-3.0.0-1.fc16.x86_64 kernel-3.0.1-3.fc16.x86_64 I removed quiet from the boot string and get no output for either kernel except this in yellow letters in the top left of the screen: Trying to allocate 1059 pages for VMLINUZ Got pages at 0x02826000 [Linux-EFI, setup=0x10b9, size 0x422b90] I haven't filed a bug report yet, hate to file one that simply says its broke! Anything else I can do to provide any output or help? This is a Sandybridge, UEFI, SDD box. Seems the same problem as I filed bug BZ #730124 for. I needed to switch to grub2 to get my system booting. Can you confirm you are still on grub1? Have to tried with kernel 3.1.0? I actually thought I was on grub2, i thought that was the default install on F16! Not to mention the look is much different on F16! I currently have: grub-0.97-75.fc16.x86_64 grub2-1.99-0.2.fc16.x86_64 Installed by default, not sure how to tell if it is booting with grub1 or 2? I do not have the normal files in /boot/grub/ that I'm used to, only one file named splash.xpm.gz, then a bunch of stuff in /boot/grub2/. Just updated to kernel-3.1.0-0.rc3.git0.0.fc16.x86_64, same problem. When your hangs are you getting this output as well? Trying to allocate 1059 pages for VMLINUZ Got pages at 0x02826000 [Linux-EFI, setup=0x10b9, size 0x422b90] -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Fedora-16-Alpha-i686-Live-Desktop - install problems
Fedora-16-Alpha-i686-Live-Desktop [A]- install problems: I could not use the install to HD Icon in gnome3-shell to install to the usb HD [B] These all failed for me: 1-)use default settings 2-) use whole disk (no LVM) 3-) custom with / ext 4 1000 /23 and swap This finally worked: 4-) format to ext4 in palimpset (on CD) then liveinst from root terminal; use whole disk (non LVM) grub 1.99~rc1 firstboot time user no smolt profile (empty) 3.0.0.-1 firstboot; time; user; smolt no profile (empty) gdm login ok dm logs in gnome3-shell 3.1.4 correctly sees wireless and wired networking =install sugar= add/remove programs: sugar select all but read add education/sugar to favorites yum install alacarte alacarte/education/sugar (properties add -f to end of command) for full screen display exit alt f2 (r) reset gnome3-shell *sugar (sugar-emulator) in gnome3-shell sugar starts: == cp/About my Computer == Fedora release 16 (Verne) sugar 0.93.2 cp/network does not start F1 network neighborhood works on jabber. (Note: Many activities seem to be messed up by new toobars) I did not test all... only a few start ==Activities== Browse fails to start. ImportError: No Module named gnome Surf fails to start. import error: cannot import name AddressEntry *sugar from gdm login ==Activities== Browse fails to start. ImportError: No Module named gnome Surf fails to start. import error: cannot import name AddressEntry Turtle Art fails to start (falls back to f3) ACER ASPIRE ONE N450 with external usb hp 550 DVD/CD writer [A] http://fedora.cat.pdx.edu/linux/releases/test/16-Alpha/Live/i686/Fedora-16-Alpha-i686-Live-Desktop.iso [B] 250 GB hitachi external usb HD -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: F16 Update Kernels fail to boot
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Andy Lawrence dr.die...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Jurgen Kramer gtmkra...@xs4all.nlwrote: On Mon, 2011-08-22 at 17:01 -0400, Andy Lawrence wrote: So far all update kernels on F16 (installed from F16rc5) have failed to boot. The installation DVD kernel 3.0.0-1.fc16.x86_64 is the only one that boots. I've attempted to boot with these with no luck: kernel-3.0.0-1.fc16.x86_64 kernel-3.0.1-3.fc16.x86_64 I removed quiet from the boot string and get no output for either kernel except this in yellow letters in the top left of the screen: Trying to allocate 1059 pages for VMLINUZ Got pages at 0x02826000 [Linux-EFI, setup=0x10b9, size 0x422b90] I haven't filed a bug report yet, hate to file one that simply says its broke! Anything else I can do to provide any output or help? This is a Sandybridge, UEFI, SDD box. Seems the same problem as I filed bug BZ #730124 for. I needed to switch to grub2 to get my system booting. Can you confirm you are still on grub1? Have to tried with kernel 3.1.0? I actually thought I was on grub2, i thought that was the default install on F16! Not to mention the look is much different on F16! I currently have: grub-0.97-75.fc16.x86_64 grub2-1.99-0.2.fc16.x86_64 Installed by default, not sure how to tell if it is booting with grub1 or 2? I do not have the normal files in /boot/grub/ that I'm used to, only one file named splash.xpm.gz, then a bunch of stuff in /boot/grub2/. Just updated to kernel-3.1.0-0.rc3.git0.0.fc16.x86_64, same problem. When your hangs are you getting this output as well? Trying to allocate 1059 pages for VMLINUZ Got pages at 0x02826000 [Linux-EFI, setup=0x10b9, size 0x422b90] According to this: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Grub2 grub2 is used by default with F16, so I'm gonna guess that's what I'm using! I tried this: grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg, which does give parameters in /boot/grub2/grub.cfg, which was empty before, but it doesn't help with booting the update kernels. My problem is a bit different than your bug, the F16rc5 install booted fine. Its only the update kernels that fail. Thanks! -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Fedora-16-Alpha-i686-Live-Desktop - install problems
On Tue, 2011-08-23 at 15:12 -0700, Thomas C Gilliard wrote: Fedora-16-Alpha-i686-Live-Desktop [A]- install problems: I could not use the install to HD Icon in gnome3-shell to install to the usb HD [B] These all failed for me: 1-)use default settings 2-) use whole disk (no LVM) 3-) custom with / ext 4 1000 /23 and swap 'failed' is rather too imprecise. What failed, exactly? Did you file a bug? -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: F16 Update Kernels fail to boot
On 08/23/2011 06:49 PM, Andy Lawrence wrote: \ According to this: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Grub2 grub2 is used by default with F16, so I'm gonna guess that's what I'm using! I tried this: grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg, which does give parameters in /boot/grub2/grub.cfg, which was empty before, but it doesn't help with booting the update kernels. POssibly - I have vague recollections it was 32 bit only for now .. and yours looks like 64 bit ... -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Fedora QA] #222: L10N Test Day
#222: L10N Test Day ---+ Reporter: noriko| Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 16 Component: Test Day | Version: Resolution:|Keywords: ---+ Comment (by noriko): Igor, The request for composing live image has now been submitted.[[BR]] https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4896 Could you mind to make an update announcement for this event? -- Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/222#comment:39 Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa Fedora Quality Assurance -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Fedora QA] #222: L10N Test Day
#222: L10N Test Day ---+ Reporter: noriko| Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 16 Component: Test Day | Version: Resolution:|Keywords: ---+ Comment (by igor): Thanks, Noriko! I'll send the announcement to the mailing lists ASAP. -- Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/222#comment:40 Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa Fedora Quality Assurance -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Fedora QA] #226: Create F16 install test plan and test result template
#226: Create F16 install test plan and test result template +--- Reporter: rhe| Owner: rhe Type: task | Status: closed Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 16 Component: Wiki | Version: Resolution: fixed |Keywords: +--- Changes (by rhe): * status: new = closed * resolution: = fixed Comment: The plan and template have been in use. Close it. Thanks. -- Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/226#comment:1 Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa Fedora Quality Assurance -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Fedora QA] #209: Add tests to cover partitioning using root on btrfs, xfs or other non-ext fstype's
#209: Add tests to cover partitioning using root on btrfs, xfs or other non-ext fstype's --+- Reporter: rhe | Owner: rhe Type: enhancement | Status: closed Priority: major| Milestone: Fedora 16 Component: Wiki | Version: Resolution: fixed|Keywords: 15 retrospective --+- Changes (by rhe): * status: new = closed * resolution: = fixed Comment: Btrfs and xfs tests have been added to the install matrix. -- Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/209#comment:16 Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa Fedora Quality Assurance -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
