dracut Warning: Unable to process initqueue was Re: F17 Rawhide iisues...

2012-04-25 Thread Frank Murphy

On 25/04/12 05:39, Rob Healey wrote:

Greetings All:

I was asked to write out what message/ error that I was getting on my
screen before the dracut shell, so here it is:


It's this bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=814625

There is a workaround in comment 22.
But if you can help with some of the testing,
Harald has suggested in:
comment 19

--
Regards,
Frank
Jack of all, fubars
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: NFS not working

2012-04-25 Thread Ed Greshko
FWIW, I did check an F16 system.  Prior to issuing the mount command the nfs 
module
is not loaded.  It gets loaded as a consequence of the mount command.
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Karma needed for builds intended for TC1

2012-04-25 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 20:12 -0700, John Reiser wrote:
 On 04/24/2012 02:56 PM, Tim Flink wrote:
  http://tflink.fedorapeople.org/iso/20120424_f17-preTC1-3.x64.boot.iso
 
  I haven't done a bare metal install with this iso yet but it boots for
  me on multiple EFI machines, so I'm pretty confident that the kinks
  have been worked out.
 
 EFI booting that DVD to update an existing Fedora 17 Beta x86_64 with
 EFI boot, and requesting Do not change bootloader config, has left
 my system unbootable.

That option is somewhat poorly named. What it really means is 'Don't let
anaconda change the bootloader config'. It doesn't prevent the kernel
post script from changing it, when the kernel package is updated; it'd
be very difficult to prevent that. So it's not actually particularly
unusual for the grub config file to be changed after such an upgrade. We
probably should rename the option somehow...

 First, it did change /boot/efi/EFI/redhat/grub.conf, even though I asked
 for no change.  Second, the update left only one stanza in grub.conf,
 completely erasing what was there before.  This was an Update, so the
 old stanzas should have remained present.  

That certainly sounds wrong.

 Third, the bootloader was
 changed to one that cannot find anything, and always drops to
 grub rescue .  Fourth, there is no help command in grub rescue.

Also wrong, but you're not providing much useful data. What exactly is
the grub config changed to? What shows in the anaconda logs from the
upgrade, particularly program.log
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: F17 vs. Pentium 4

2012-04-25 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 09:55 -0500, Michael Hennebry wrote:
 On Wed, 18 Apr 2012, Michael Hennebry wrote:
 
  On Wed, 18 Apr 2012, Adam Williamson wrote:
 
  I wouldn't be hugely worried about any of them. Try doing a full install
  and I suspect a lot of the above 'weirdness' would go away.
 
  Will do.
 
 Done.
 
 Which of these should I worry about?
 [root@localhost ~]# grep -v stall install.log
 warning: fontpackages-filesystem-1.44-2.fc15.noarch: Header V3 RSA/SHA256 
 Signature, key ID a82ba4b7: NOKEY
 /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.70BdJf: line 1: /usr/sbin/update-alternatives: No such file 
 or directory 
 warning: %post(tomcat-servlet-3.0-api-0:7.0.26-1.fc16.noarch) scriptlet 
 failed, exit status 127 
 /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.pKiL8w: line 1: /usr/sbin/update-alternatives: No such file 
 or directory 
 warning: %post(tomcat-jsp-2.2-api-0:7.0.26-1.fc16.noarch) scriptlet failed, 
 exit status 127 
 /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.NaLh0X: line 3: find: command not found 
 /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.hawg7Q: line 1: /usr/sbin/update-alternatives: No such file 
 or directory 
 warning: %post(tomcat-el-2.2-api-0:7.0.26-1.fc16.noarch) scriptlet failed, 
 exit status 127 
 Running in chroot, ignoring request. 
 SELinux:  Could not downgrade policy file 
 /etc/selinux/targeted/policy/policy.26, searching for an older version.
 SELinux:  Could not open policy file = 
 /etc/selinux/targeted/policy/policy.26:  No such file or directory
 load_policy:  Can't load policy:  No such file or directory
 6874 blocks
 *** FINISHED INSTALLING PACKAGES ***
 
 
 getenforce says Disabled, I expect because of the above Could nots.
 Is this something that wold be fixed with an auto-relabel?

Are you somehow missing the selinux-policy-targeted package? That should
have the file in question.

The RPM post errors could be reported as bugs in those packages, though
they may be 'false errors', I guess. It _looks_ like those packages
aren't properly requiring tools they execute in their %post scripts.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Lots of schema related warnings on yum update

2012-04-25 Thread Ankur Sinha
Hello,

I get these schema warnings on updating my F17 system:


 warning: Schema 'org.freedesktop.Telepathy.Logger' has path 
 '/apps/telepathy-logger/'.  Paths starting with '/apps/', '/desktop/' or 
 '/system/' are deprecated.
 warning: Schema 'org.freedesktop.gstreamer-0.10.default-elements' has path 
 '/desktop/gstreamer/0.10/default-elements/'.  Paths starting with '/apps/', 
 '/desktop/' or '/system/' are deprecated.
 warning: Schema 'org.freedesktop.ibus' has path '/desktop/ibus/'.  Paths 
 starting with '/apps/', '/desktop/' or '/system/' are deprecated.
 warning: Schema 'org.freedesktop.ibus.general' has path 
 '/desktop/ibus/general/'.  Paths starting with '/apps/', '/desktop/' or 
 '/system/' are deprecated.
 warning: Schema 'org.freedesktop.ibus.general.hotkey' has path 
 '/desktop/ibus/general/hotkey/'.  Paths starting with '/apps/', '/desktop/' 
 or '/system/' are deprecated.
 warning: Schema 'org.freedesktop.ibus.general.xkblayoutconfig' has path 
 '/desktop/ibus/general/xkblayoutconfig/'.  Paths starting with '/apps/', 
 '/desktop/' or '/system/' are deprecated.
 warning: Schema 'org.freedesktop.ibus.panel' has path '/desktop/ibus/panel/'. 
  Paths starting with '/apps/', '/desktop/' or '/system/' are deprecated.
 warning: Schema 'org.gnome.Cheese' has path '/apps/cheese/'.  Paths starting 
 with '/apps/', '/desktop/' or '/system/' are deprecated.
 warning: Schema 'org.gnome.Vino' has path '/desktop/gnome/remote-access/'.  
 Paths starting with '/apps/', '/desktop/' or '/system/' are deprecated.
 warning: Schema 'org.gnome.crypto.cache' has path 
 '/desktop/gnome/crypto/cache/'.  Paths starting with '/apps/', '/desktop/' or 
 '/system/' are deprecated.
 warning: Schema 'org.gnome.crypto.pgp' has path '/desktop/gnome/crypto/pgp/'. 
  Paths starting with '/apps/', '/desktop/' or '/system/' are deprecated.
 warning: Schema 'org.gnome.seahorse' has path '/apps/seahorse/'.  Paths 
 starting with '/apps/', '/desktop/' or '/system/' are deprecated.
 warning: Schema 'org.gnome.seahorse.manager' has path 
 '/apps/seahorse/listing/'.  Paths starting with '/apps/', '/desktop/' or 
 '/system/' are deprecated.
 warning: Schema 'org.gnome.system.dns_sd' has path '/system/dns-sd/'.  Paths 
 starting with '/apps/', '/desktop/' or '/system/' are deprecated.
 warning: Schema 'org.gnome.system.locale' has path '/system/locale/'.  Paths 
 starting with '/apps/', '/desktop/' or '/system/' are deprecated.
 warning: Schema 'org.gnome.system.proxy' has path '/system/proxy/'.  Paths 
 starting with '/apps/', '/desktop/' or '/system/' are deprecated.
 warning: Schema 'org.gnome.system.proxy.http' has path '/system/proxy/http/'. 
  Paths starting with '/apps/', '/desktop/' or '/system/' are deprecated.
 warning: Schema 'org.gnome.system.proxy.https' has path 
 '/system/proxy/https/'.  Paths starting with '/apps/', '/desktop/' or 
 '/system/' are deprecated.
 warning: Schema 'org.gnome.system.proxy.ftp' has path '/system/proxy/ftp/'.  
 Paths starting with '/apps/', '/desktop/' or '/system/' are deprecated.
 warning: Schema 'org.gnome.system.proxy.socks' has path 
 '/system/proxy/socks/'.  Paths starting with '/apps/', '/desktop/' or 
 '/system/' are deprecated.
 warning: Schema 'org.gnome.system.smb' has path '/system/smb/'.  Paths 
 starting with '/apps/', '/desktop/' or '/system/' are deprecated.
 warning: Schema 
 'org.yorba.shotwell.sharing.org-yorba-shotwell-publishing-piwigo' has path 
 '/apps/shotwell/sharing/org-yorba-shotwell-publishing-piwigo/'.  Paths 
 starting with '/apps/', '/desktop/' or '/system/' are deprecated.
 warning: Schema 
 'org.yorba.shotwell.sharing.org-yorba-shotwell-publishing-yandex-fotki' has 
 path '/apps/shotwell/sharing/org-yorba-shotwell-publishing-yandex-fotki/'.  
 Paths starting with '/apps/', '/desktop/' or '/system/' are deprecated.
 warning: Schema 'org.yorba.shotwell' has path '/apps/shotwell/'.  Paths 
 starting with '/apps/', '/desktop/' or '/system/' are deprecated.
 warning: Schema 'org.yorba.shotwell.preferences' has path 
 '/apps/shotwell/preferences/'.  Paths starting with '/apps/', '/desktop/' or 
 '/system/' are deprecated.
 warning: Schema 'org.yorba.shotwell.preferences.ui' has path 
 '/apps/shotwell/preferences/ui/'.  Paths starting with '/apps/', '/desktop/' 
 or '/system/' are deprecated.
 warning: Schema 'org.yorba.shotwell.preferences.slideshow' has path 
 '/apps/shotwell/preferences/slideshow/'.  Paths starting with '/apps/', 
 '/desktop/' or '/system/' are deprecated.
 warning: Schema 'org.yorba.shotwell.preferences.window' has path 
 '/apps/shotwell/preferences/window/'.  Paths starting with '/apps/', 
 '/desktop/' or '/system/' are deprecated.
 warning: Schema 'org.yorba.shotwell.preferences.files' has path 
 '/apps/shotwell/preferences/files/'.  Paths starting with '/apps/', 
 '/desktop/' or '/system/' are deprecated.
 warning: Schema 'org.yorba.shotwell.crop-settings' has path 
 '/apps/shotwell/crop-settings/'.  Paths starting with '/apps/', '/desktop/' 

F-17 Branched report: 20120425 changes

2012-04-25 Thread Fedora Branched Report
Compose started at Wed Apr 25 08:15:05 UTC 2012

Broken deps for x86_64
--
[aeolus-conductor]
aeolus-conductor-0.4.0-2.fc17.noarch requires ruby(abi) = 0:1.8
[aeolus-configserver]
aeolus-configserver-0.4.5-1.fc17.noarch requires ruby-nokogiri
[dh-make]
dh-make-0.55-4.fc17.noarch requires debhelper
[dustmite]
dustmite-1-4.20120304gitcde46e0.fc17.x86_64 requires 
libphobos2-ldc.so()(64bit)
[egoboo]
egoboo-2.7.5-11.fc17.x86_64 requires libenet-1.2.1.so()(64bit)
[gcc-python-plugin]
gcc-python2-debug-plugin-0.9-1.fc17.x86_64 requires gcc = 
0:4.7.0-0.10.fc17
gcc-python2-plugin-0.9-1.fc17.x86_64 requires gcc = 0:4.7.0-0.10.fc17
gcc-python3-debug-plugin-0.9-1.fc17.x86_64 requires gcc = 
0:4.7.0-0.10.fc17
gcc-python3-plugin-0.9-1.fc17.x86_64 requires gcc = 0:4.7.0-0.10.fc17
[gorm]
gorm-1.2.13-0.2.20110331.fc17.i686 requires libobjc.so.3
gorm-1.2.13-0.2.20110331.fc17.i686 requires libgnustep-gui.so.0.20
gorm-1.2.13-0.2.20110331.fc17.i686 requires libgnustep-base.so.1.23
gorm-1.2.13-0.2.20110331.fc17.x86_64 requires libobjc.so.3()(64bit)
gorm-1.2.13-0.2.20110331.fc17.x86_64 requires 
libgnustep-gui.so.0.20()(64bit)
gorm-1.2.13-0.2.20110331.fc17.x86_64 requires 
libgnustep-base.so.1.23()(64bit)
[ibus-panel-extensions]
ibus-panel-extensions-1.4.99.20111207-2.fc17.i686 requires 
libibus-1.0.so.0
ibus-panel-extensions-1.4.99.20111207-2.fc17.x86_64 requires 
libibus-1.0.so.0()(64bit)
[matreshka]
matreshka-0.1.1-9.fc17.i686 requires libgnat-4.6.so
matreshka-0.1.1-9.fc17.x86_64 requires libgnat-4.6.so()(64bit)
matreshka-fastcgi-0.1.1-9.fc17.i686 requires libgnat-4.6.so
matreshka-fastcgi-0.1.1-9.fc17.i686 requires libgnarl-4.6.so
matreshka-fastcgi-0.1.1-9.fc17.x86_64 requires libgnat-4.6.so()(64bit)
matreshka-fastcgi-0.1.1-9.fc17.x86_64 requires libgnarl-4.6.so()(64bit)
matreshka-sql-core-0.1.1-9.fc17.i686 requires libgnat-4.6.so
matreshka-sql-core-0.1.1-9.fc17.x86_64 requires libgnat-4.6.so()(64bit)
matreshka-sql-postgresql-0.1.1-9.fc17.i686 requires libgnat-4.6.so
matreshka-sql-postgresql-0.1.1-9.fc17.x86_64 requires 
libgnat-4.6.so()(64bit)
matreshka-sql-sqlite-0.1.1-9.fc17.i686 requires libgnat-4.6.so
matreshka-sql-sqlite-0.1.1-9.fc17.x86_64 requires 
libgnat-4.6.so()(64bit)
[mcollective]
mcollective-common-1.3.1-7.fc17.noarch requires ruby(abi) = 0:1.8
[meshlab]
meshlab-1.3.1-2.fc17.x86_64 requires libmuparser.so.0()(64bit)
[moksha]
moksha-0.5.0-5.fc15.noarch requires pyevent
[natus]
libnatus-V8-0.1.5-2.fc15.x86_64 requires libv8-3.0.0.1.so()(64bit)
[ocaml-augeas]
ocaml-augeas-0.4-9.fc15.x86_64 requires ocaml(runtime) = 0:3.12.0
[openvrml]
libopenvrml-0.18.8-2.fc16.i686 requires libboost_thread-mt.so.1.47.0
libopenvrml-0.18.8-2.fc16.i686 requires libboost_system-mt.so.1.47.0
libopenvrml-0.18.8-2.fc16.i686 requires libboost_filesystem-mt.so.1.47.0
libopenvrml-0.18.8-2.fc16.x86_64 requires 
libboost_thread-mt.so.1.47.0()(64bit)
libopenvrml-0.18.8-2.fc16.x86_64 requires 
libboost_system-mt.so.1.47.0()(64bit)
libopenvrml-0.18.8-2.fc16.x86_64 requires 
libboost_filesystem-mt.so.1.47.0()(64bit)
libopenvrml-gl-0.18.8-2.fc16.i686 requires libboost_thread-mt.so.1.47.0
libopenvrml-gl-0.18.8-2.fc16.i686 requires libboost_system-mt.so.1.47.0
libopenvrml-gl-0.18.8-2.fc16.i686 requires 
libboost_filesystem-mt.so.1.47.0
libopenvrml-gl-0.18.8-2.fc16.x86_64 requires 
libboost_thread-mt.so.1.47.0()(64bit)
libopenvrml-gl-0.18.8-2.fc16.x86_64 requires 
libboost_system-mt.so.1.47.0()(64bit)
libopenvrml-gl-0.18.8-2.fc16.x86_64 requires 
libboost_filesystem-mt.so.1.47.0()(64bit)
openvrml-java-0.18.8-2.fc16.x86_64 requires 
libboost_thread-mt.so.1.47.0()(64bit)
openvrml-java-0.18.8-2.fc16.x86_64 requires 
libboost_system-mt.so.1.47.0()(64bit)
openvrml-java-0.18.8-2.fc16.x86_64 requires 
libboost_filesystem-mt.so.1.47.0()(64bit)
openvrml-java-0.18.8-2.fc16.x86_64 requires java-1.6.0-openjdk(x86-64)
openvrml-javascript-0.18.8-2.fc16.x86_64 requires 
libboost_thread-mt.so.1.47.0()(64bit)
openvrml-javascript-0.18.8-2.fc16.x86_64 requires 
libboost_system-mt.so.1.47.0()(64bit)
openvrml-javascript-0.18.8-2.fc16.x86_64 requires 
libboost_filesystem-mt.so.1.47.0()(64bit)
openvrml-nodes-0.18.8-2.fc16.x86_64 requires 
libboost_thread-mt.so.1.47.0()(64bit)
openvrml-nodes-0.18.8-2.fc16.x86_64 requires 
libboost_system-mt.so.1.47.0()(64bit)
openvrml-nodes-0.18.8-2.fc16.x86_64 requires 
libboost_filesystem-mt.so.1.47.0()(64bit)
openvrml-xembed-0.18.8-2.fc16.x86_64 requires 
libboost_thread-mt.so.1.47.0()(64bit)

Re: Lots of schema related warnings on yum update

2012-04-25 Thread Kalev Lember
On 04/25/2012 12:50 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
 Hello,
 
 I get these schema warnings on updating my F17 system:
 warning: Schema 'org.freedesktop.Telepathy.Logger' has path 
 '/apps/telepathy-logger/'.  Paths starting with '/apps/', '/desktop/' or 
 '/system/' are deprecated.
[...]
 How should these be handled? Do we file bugs? Do we ignore these?

There was a late change in glib-compile-schemas, introducing these
warnings. A lot of packages run glib-compile-schemas in rpm scripts [1]
at package install / uninstall time, so this also shows up during yum
updates.

The fix would be to redirect glib-compile-schemas output to /dev/null in
each of the packages that run glib-compile-schemas.
I've done a number of packages here:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-6591

Also see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=814053

If you find any other packages with noisy %post scriptlets, beyond what
I've already fixed in that update, file bugs against the packages.

I used the following one-liner to identify packages needing fixing. If
you apply the update above (might still see some warnings during the
update from old packages uninstallation) and then run this, you might
find some new ones that need fixing:

rpm -qa | while read pkg ; do if rpm -q --scripts $pkg | grep 
glib-compile-schemas | grep -v '/dev/null'  /dev/null ; then echo $pkg 
doesn't redirect glib-compile-schemas output ; fi ; done


[1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#GSettings_Schema

-- 
Kalev
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Karma needed for builds intended for TC1

2012-04-25 Thread John Reiser
 you're not providing much useful data.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=816238

-- 
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: GSoC 2012: On-Demand Fedora Build Service

2012-04-25 Thread Brendan Jones

On 04/25/2012 05:15 PM, Amit Saha wrote:

Hello Everyone:

I am Amit. I shall be working on the project On-Demand Fedora Build
Service [1], as part of the Google Summer of Code 2012. Over the past
few weeks, I have been in touch with Tim Flink, who is my mentor for
this project and we have been discussing (well, Tim has been sharing
his thoughts) with me about how we could build a more friendly image
building system to help the Fedora QA community during the testing
phase.

I shall have more updates as I progress on this project, and I shall
look forward to your thoughts and comments on the proposed project.

Since I am very much a newbie to the Fedora QA community (not Fedora),
I might have some silly questions to ask.


[1] 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/GSOC_2012/Student_Application_amitksaha/OnDemandBuildService

Best,
Amit


Hello and welcome Amit!

Whilst I'm not very active in the Fedora QA community, I am a mentor for 
another GSOC project (Audio spin), with which we also hope to indulge 
more upon the support of the QA team. Will watch your progress with 
interest - perhaps you can share the URL of your blog?


regards,

Brendan
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: GSoC 2012: On-Demand Fedora Build Service

2012-04-25 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2012-04-25 at 20:45 +0530, Amit Saha wrote:
 Hello Everyone:
 
 I am Amit. I shall be working on the project On-Demand Fedora Build
 Service [1], as part of the Google Summer of Code 2012. Over the past
 few weeks, I have been in touch with Tim Flink, who is my mentor for
 this project and we have been discussing (well, Tim has been sharing
 his thoughts) with me about how we could build a more friendly image
 building system to help the Fedora QA community during the testing
 phase.
 
 I shall have more updates as I progress on this project, and I shall
 look forward to your thoughts and comments on the proposed project.
 
 Since I am very much a newbie to the Fedora QA community (not Fedora),
 I might have some silly questions to ask.

Hi Amit, and welcome! Thanks very much for volunteering for this
project, it would be a big benefit to QA if it can be successfully
created.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: GSoC 2012: On-Demand Fedora Build Service

2012-04-25 Thread Tim Flink
On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 20:45:11 +0530
Amit Saha amitks...@fedoraproject.org wrote:

 Hello Everyone:
 
 I am Amit. I shall be working on the project On-Demand Fedora Build
 Service [1], as part of the Google Summer of Code 2012. Over the past
 few weeks, I have been in touch with Tim Flink, who is my mentor for
 this project and we have been discussing (well, Tim has been sharing
 his thoughts) with me about how we could build a more friendly image
 building system to help the Fedora QA community during the testing
 phase.
 
 I shall have more updates as I progress on this project, and I shall
 look forward to your thoughts and comments on the proposed project.
 
 Since I am very much a newbie to the Fedora QA community (not Fedora),
 I might have some silly questions to ask.
 
 
 [1]
 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/GSOC_2012/Student_Application_amitksaha/OnDemandBuildService

Welcome to QA land and congratulations again on being accepted for GSoC!

I'm certainly looking forward to seeing this happen but then again, I tend to be
one of the people who is building test images by hand :)

Tim



signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: yum update failed today with....

2012-04-25 Thread Jonathan Kamens
That would seem to be an issue with the google-chrome-unstable RPM, 
which almost certainly should not package /usr/bin. Since that RPM is 
provided by Google, not by Fedora, you need to take it up with them.


  jik

On 4/25/2012 12:40 PM, Kevin Martin wrote:

Transaction Check Error:
   file /usr/bin from install of 
google-chrome-unstable-20.0.1115.1-133713.x86_64 conflicts with file from 
package
filesystem-3.1-1.fc18.x86_64

Kevin

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: yum update failed today with....

2012-04-25 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Kevin Martin ktm...@gmail.com said:
 Transaction Check Error:
   file /usr/bin from install of 
 google-chrome-unstable-20.0.1115.1-133713.x86_64 conflicts with file from 
 package
 filesystem-3.1-1.fc18.x86_64

It looks like a bunch of the common directories have been changed to
read-only in the filesystem package (haven't seen any notice/discussion
about that, but maybe I missed it).

The other issue would be: why is google-chrome-unstable (wherever you
are getting that from) packaing the /usr/bin directory?  It shouldn't do
that.

-- 
Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: GSoC 2012: On-Demand Fedora Build Service

2012-04-25 Thread John Reiser
 how we could build a more friendly image
 building system to help the Fedora QA community during the testing
 phase.

Short latency tends to improve friendliness.  By fiddling with pungi
environment, I'm down to about 9.5 minutes to create an install .iso
after downloads have finished.

If makedeltaiso produced a new .iso from an old .iso plus a list of
changed .rpms, then that might help (as long as the changes involve
no new dependencies.)

-- 
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Karma needed for builds intended for TC1

2012-04-25 Thread Tom H
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 5:31 AM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
 On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 20:12 -0700, John Reiser wrote:

 EFI booting that DVD to update an existing Fedora 17 Beta x86_64 with
 EFI boot, and requesting Do not change bootloader config, has left
 my system unbootable.

 That option is somewhat poorly named. What it really means is 'Don't let
 anaconda change the bootloader config'. It doesn't prevent the kernel
 post script from changing it, when the kernel package is updated; it'd
 be very difficult to prevent that. So it's not actually particularly
 unusual for the grub config file to be changed after such an upgrade. We
 probably should rename the option somehow...

 First, it did change /boot/efi/EFI/redhat/grub.conf, even though I asked
 for no change.  Second, the update left only one stanza in grub.conf,
 completely erasing what was there before.  This was an Update, so the
 old stanzas should have remained present.

 That certainly sounds wrong.

 Third, the bootloader was
 changed to one that cannot find anything, and always drops to
 grub rescue .  Fourth, there is no help command in grub rescue.

 Also wrong, but you're not providing much useful data. What exactly is
 the grub config changed to? What shows in the anaconda logs from the
 upgrade, particularly program.log

Since there's a grub rescue prompt, has grub2 replaced grub-efi
(which, IIUC, is an EFI version of grub1)?
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: yum update failed today with....

2012-04-25 Thread Dennis Gilmore
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 12:51:49 -0400
Jonathan Kamens j...@kamens.us wrote:

 On 4/25/2012 12:47 PM, Kamil Paral wrote:
  Isn't it common to also include the directories you want to place
  files into?
 
  $ rpm -ql google-chrome-stable | grep /bin
  /usr/bin
  /usr/bin/google-chrome
 No. This is not correct packaging.
 
 It is reasonable for an RPM to /require /the presence of the system 
 directories it uses as prerequisites before it can be installed, so
 that if the filesystem layout changes in a way that the RPM doesn't
 expect, it will refuse to install (which is correct behavior).
 
 It is /not/ reasonable for an RPM to /include/ shared directories
 that it does not own. Files and directories should only be owned by a
 single RPM.
 
 On my system, there are only four RPMs (out of 3616) that provide 
 /usr/bin: VirtualBox, filesystem, google-earth-stable, and 
 google-chrome-stable. It is telling that three of these four RPMs are 
 third-party RPMs. Their maintainers are shipping buggy RPMs and they 
 should fix them.
 
 This is generally a sign that they were lazy when writing their spec 
 files... Instead of constructing the %files section of the spec file 
 carefully to include only the files they actually own, they just put
 * in the spec file to include the entire contents of the install 
 directory. Yuck.

actually a * would have been preferable  what they would have used is
%{_bindir}  they should have done %{_bindir}/* so they own whats in
there but not the directory itself if they jsut used something like /*
they would also own /usr  but its very buggy packaging.

Dennis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk+YLmcACgkQkSxm47BaWffNfACfSuDzONlsYnujBTTbe2+A6hC8
1PIAnA9hqYry5AwnvbkEngNJJ+LL+QKY
=+FIa
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: yum update failed today with....

2012-04-25 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2012-04-25 at 12:47 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:

 Isn't it common to also include the directories you want to place files into?

Only when there's any real chance of them not existing otherwise. I'd
say packaging any directory which is part of FHS is a clear error.
Packaging a directory is essentially to assert ownership of it. You can
read it as meaning 'if this package is not installed, this directory
should not exist'. That's a good test of whether you should be packaging
any given directory: does that statement make sense?
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: yum update failed today with....

2012-04-25 Thread Panu Matilainen

On 04/25/2012 07:45 PM, Chris Adams wrote:

Once upon a time, Kevin Martinktm...@gmail.com  said:

Transaction Check Error:
   file /usr/bin from install of 
google-chrome-unstable-20.0.1115.1-133713.x86_64 conflicts with file from 
package
filesystem-3.1-1.fc18.x86_64


It looks like a bunch of the common directories have been changed to
read-only in the filesystem package (haven't seen any notice/discussion
about that, but maybe I missed it).


The permission difference might've been there forever, rpm has only very 
recently (in rawhide) started to raise file conflicts when 
user/group/mode differences.




The other issue would be: why is google-chrome-unstable (wherever you
are getting that from) packaing the /usr/bin directory?  It shouldn't do
that.


Yup, its a packaging bug in google-chrome.

- Panu -

--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: yum update failed today with....

2012-04-25 Thread Jon Ciesla
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Panu Matilainen
pmati...@laiskiainen.org wrote:
 On 04/25/2012 07:45 PM, Chris Adams wrote:

 Once upon a time, Kevin Martinktm...@gmail.com  said:

 Transaction Check Error:
   file /usr/bin from install of
 google-chrome-unstable-20.0.1115.1-133713.x86_64 conflicts with file from
 package
 filesystem-3.1-1.fc18.x86_64


 It looks like a bunch of the common directories have been changed to
 read-only in the filesystem package (haven't seen any notice/discussion
 about that, but maybe I missed it).


 The permission difference might've been there forever, rpm has only very
 recently (in rawhide) started to raise file conflicts when user/group/mode
 differences.


 The other issue would be: why is google-chrome-unstable (wherever you
 are getting that from) packaing the /usr/bin directory?  It shouldn't do
 that.


 Yup, its a packaging bug in google-chrome.

gasp

What?  That's unpossible!

-J

        - Panu -

 --
 test mailing list
 test@lists.fedoraproject.org
 To unsubscribe:
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test



-- 
http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/

in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love

-d. bowie
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

F17: sudo reboot/shutdown -P now taking ~2 mins to shutdown

2012-04-25 Thread Pedro Francisco
$ sudo reboot
or
$ sudo shutdown -P now

takes ~1/2 mins to shutdown; using Restart or Shutdown in GDM/Gnome
session menu takes ~10 seconds.

Any ideas why?

F17, x86.
-- 
Pedro
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

F17 still complaining about write cache

2012-04-25 Thread Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R

These error messages keep coming even with today's fresh install.

Apr 25 13:28:51 omen3 kernel: [  942.329285] sd 12:0:0:0: [sdc] Test WP 
failed, assume Write Enabled
Apr 25 13:28:51 omen3 kernel: [  942.330985] sd 12:0:0:0: [sdc] Asking 
for cache data failed
Apr 25 13:28:51 omen3 kernel: [  942.330992] sd 12:0:0:0: [sdc] Assuming 
drive cache: write through


Otherwise, install from DVD and from pxeboot using custom disk layout 
completed without problems.

No problems seen with simple NFS ops.
I am installing the apps that seem to trigger the Noveau wedge.

--
Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R c...@omen.com   www.omen.com
Developer of Industrial ZMODEM(Tm) for Embedded Applications
  Omen Technology Inc  The High Reliability Software
10255 NW Old Cornelius Pass Portland OR 97231   503-614-0430

--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Nouveau fails with F17 Beta on GeForce 6150 (NV4E)

2012-04-25 Thread Marcel Oliver
Dear both,

thanks for your replies.  I have updated the bugzilla report with the
requested F16 log files using remote ssh.

However, I failed with both suggested methods to get boot logs off the
F17 beta life CD.

(a) 'nouveau.modeset=0' brings up plymouth, but when it finishes, it
starts X with apparently the vesa driver, so working (poor) X and
no nouveau debug output.  I did not find a way to disable
graphical boot completely (and then change to X with the full
nouveau driver).

(b) netconsole does not give me any output at the receiving end.  I
have verified carefully that the receiving machine and the network
is set up properly, and the source machine can send (on a
functioning F16) UDP packets to the logger on the receiving end.
However, with the netconsole on the kernel parameter line, nothing
happens.  No idea how to debug this - I followed the instructions
quite carefully and verified the MAC address as suggested as well.

In any case, I suspect that the problem is not F17 specific, but
rather tied to the 3.3 kernel, so that the F16 logs could possibly
suffice.

Could you let me know if you can work with the information provided,
or if there anything else I could try?

Regards,
Marcel

Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk writes:
  On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 01:38:01PM +0200, Marcel Oliver wrote:
   Hi,
   
   I am having worsening problems with the nouveau driver on GeForce 6150
   (NV4E), this is the onboard graphics on the ASUS M2NPV-VM.  So I tried
   F17 Beta (x86) yesterday to see what the status is.  Result: total
   failure - the screen goes to a very dark blue and the keyboard appears
   also dead.
   
   This same problem already shows up on F16 with any of the 3.3 kernels
   (last working kernel is 3.2.10-3 without acceleration, acceleration
   never worked on this chip), see
   
   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810490
   
   Question:
   
   - Should I file another bug report on F17 beta?
  
  Can you just add the serial/dmesg output with drm.info=255 to the bug?
   
   - If so, what are the chances that someone looks at it?
   
   - Is there any easy way to extract the requested debug information
 from the system in the failing configuration?  Ideally, I'd like to
 write out to USB stick without installing the system, but since no
 user interaction is possible, that seems too much to ask?
 Alternatively, if I install on a scratch partition, is there a way
 to instrument the startup code to write the necessary debug
 information to disk for later inspection from a working system?
 Networking would be a bit of a pain to bring up...
  
  You could boot in text mode (so recovery) with 'nouveau.modeset=0'.
  Set up your network, SSH in the box, and then 'exec /sbin/init 5'
  to start X. Then from your SSH session run 'dmesg' to get that
  output.
  
  Oh, you should also have 'debug loglevel=8' on your Linux command
  line.
  
   
   Any comments appreciated, also an estimate of the chances of being
   able to use Fedora on this machine again...
   
   Regards,
   Marcel
   -- 
   test mailing list
   test@lists.fedoraproject.org
   To unsubscribe:
   https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Fedora 16 updates-testing report

2012-04-25 Thread updates
The following Fedora 16 Security updates need testing:


https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-6365/openstack-nova-2011.3.1-8.fc16

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-6368/bugzilla-4.0.6-1.fc16

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-5624/phpMyAdmin-3.5.0-1.fc16

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-6403/openssl-1.0.0i-1.fc16

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-6375/cifs-utils-5.4-1.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-6411/nginx-1.0.15-1.fc16

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-6409/rubygems-1.8.11-3.fc16.1

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-6529/argyllcms-1.4.0-1.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-5058/expat-2.1.0-1.fc16

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-5833/python3-3.2.3-1.fc16

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-6628/dokuwiki-0-0.10.20110525.a.fc16

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-6622/firefox-12.0-1.fc16,xulrunner-12.0-1.fc16

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-6542/wordpress-3.3.2-2.fc16

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-5924/python-2.7.3-1.fc16,python-docs-2.7.3-1.fc16

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-6612/asterisk-1.8.11.1-1.fc16

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-6614/gdb-7.3.50.20110722-16.fc16

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-6179/gridengine-6.2u5p2-7.fc16.3

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-14691/tomcat6-6.0.32-19.fc16

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-6382/samba4-4.0.0-38.alpha16.fc16


The following Fedora 16 Critical Path updates have yet to be approved:


https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-6614/gdb-7.3.50.20110722-16.fc16

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-6622/firefox-12.0-1.fc16,xulrunner-12.0-1.fc16

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-6613/selinux-policy-3.10.0-86.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-6550/bash-4.2.24-2.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-6516/pcre-8.12-9.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-6389/taglib-1.7.2-1.fc16

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-6403/openssl-1.0.0i-1.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-6416/fuse-2.8.7-1.fc16.1

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-6204/libdrm-2.4.33-1.fc16

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-6209/xorg-x11-drv-ati-6.14.3-5.20120201git36c190671.fc16

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-6004/sane-backends-1.0.22-10.fc16

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-5906/rsyslog-5.8.10-1.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-3319/GConf2-3.2.3-4.fc16


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora 16 updates-testing

asterisk-1.8.11.1-1.fc16
bind-9.8.2-1.fc16
dokuwiki-0-0.10.20110525.a.fc16
emelfm2-0.8.1-1.fc16
firefox-12.0-1.fc16
gdb-7.3.50.20110722-16.fc16
ghc-void-0.5.5-1.fc16
is-interface-1.12.2-2.fc16
json_diff-1.3.3-1.fc16
libreoffice-3.4.5.2-13.fc16
mcollective-1.3.3-3.fc16
python-cagraph-1.2-10.fc16
pytorctl-0-0.9.20111213git.fc16
rubygem-xmlparser-0.6.81-10.fc16
selinux-policy-3.10.0-86.fc16
soundconverter-1.5.4-15.fc16
srptools-0.0.4-13.fc16
usb_modeswitch-1.2.3-1.fc16
usb_modeswitch-data-20120120-1.fc16
vanessa_socket-0.0.12-1.fc16
xulrunner-12.0-1.fc16

Details about builds:



 asterisk-1.8.11.1-1.fc16 (FEDORA-2012-6612)
 The Open Source PBX

Update Information:

The Asterisk Development Team has announced security releases for Asterisk 
1.6.2,
1.8, and 10. The available security releases are released as versions 1.6.2.24,
1.8.11.1, and 10.3.1.

These releases are available for immediate download at
http://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/telephony/asterisk/releases

The release of Asterisk 1.6.2.24, 1.8.11.1, and 10.3.1 resolve the following two
issues:

 * A permission escalation vulnerability in Asterisk Manager Interface.  This
  would potentially allow remote authenticated users the ability to execute
  commands on the system shell with the privileges of the user running the
  Asterisk application.

 * A heap overflow vulnerability in the Skinny Channel driver.  The keypad
  button message event failed to check the length of a fixed length buffer
  before appending a received digit to the end of that buffer.  A remote
  authenticated user could send sufficient keypad button message events that the
  buffer would be overrun.

In addition, the release of Asterisk 1.8.11.1 and 10.3.1 resolve the following

Fedora 15 updates-testing report

2012-04-25 Thread updates
The following Fedora 15 Security updates need testing:

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-6371/nginx-1.0.15-1.fc15

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-5631/phpMyAdmin-3.5.0-1.fc15

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-6395/openssl-1.0.0i-1.fc15

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-6414/rubygems-1.7.2-5.fc15

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-6349/samba4-4.0.0-26.alpha11.fc15.6

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-6396/bugzilla-3.6.9-1.fc15

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-6511/wordpress-3.3.2-2.fc15

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-6630/dokuwiki-0-0.10.20110525.a.fc15

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-6610/xulrunner-12.0-1.fc15,firefox-12.0-1.fc15,gnome-python2-extras-2.25.3-35.fc15.7,perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed-0.09-1.fc15.11

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-5916/python3-3.2.3-1.fc15
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-6629/gdb-7.3.1-50.fc15

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-6177/gridengine-6.2u5-10.fc15.3

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-6398/cifs-utils-5.4-1.fc15

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-17233/tor-0.2.1.32-1500.fc15


The following Fedora 15 Critical Path updates have yet to be approved:

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-6629/gdb-7.3.1-50.fc15

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-6610/xulrunner-12.0-1.fc15,firefox-12.0-1.fc15,gnome-python2-extras-2.25.3-35.fc15.7,perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed-0.09-1.fc15.11

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-6552/PackageKit-0.6.17-2.fc15
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-6517/pcre-8.12-8.fc15

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-6395/openssl-1.0.0i-1.fc15
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-6373/fuse-2.8.7-1.fc15.1

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-5915/python-2.7.3-2.fc15,python-docs-2.7.3-1.fc15

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-5745/nss-util-3.13.4-2.fc15,nss-3.13.4-2.fc15,nss-softokn-3.13.4-1.fc15,nspr-4.9-2.fc15
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dracut-009-15.fc15

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-13190/phonon-backend-gstreamer-4.5.90-2.fc15,phonon-4.5.57-1.20110914.fc15


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora 15 updates-testing

bind-9.8.2-1.fc15
dokuwiki-0-0.10.20110525.a.fc15
emelfm2-0.8.1-1.fc15
firefox-12.0-1.fc15
gdb-7.3.1-50.fc15
ghc-void-0.5.5-1.fc15
gnome-python2-extras-2.25.3-35.fc15.7
perl-Gtk2-MozEmbed-0.09-1.fc15.11
python-cagraph-1.2-10.fc15
pytorctl-0-0.9.20111213git.fc15
rubygem-xmlparser-0.6.81-9.fc15
srptools-0.0.4-13.fc15
xulrunner-12.0-1.fc15

Details about builds:



 bind-9.8.2-1.fc15 (FEDORA-2012-6606)
 The Berkeley Internet Name Domain (BIND) DNS (Domain Name System) server

Update Information:

Update to the latest 9.8.2 stable release.

ChangeLog:

* Tue Apr 24 2012 Adam Tkac atkac redhat com 32:9.8.2-1
- update to 9.8.2
- bind-9.5-overflow.patch is no longer needed




 dokuwiki-0-0.10.20110525.a.fc15 (FEDORA-2012-6630)
 Standards compliant simple to use wiki

Update Information:

Fix XSS Flaw

ChangeLog:

* Tue Apr 24 2012 Andrew Colin Kissa and...@topdog.za.net - 0-0.10.20110525.a
- Fix CVE-2012-2129
- Fix Bugzilla bugs #815123

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #815122 - CVE-2012-2128 CVE-2012-2129 dokuwiki: XSS and CSRF due 
improper escaping of 'target' parameter in preprocessing edit form data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=815122




 emelfm2-0.8.1-1.fc15 (FEDORA-2012-6618)
 File manager that implements the popular two-pane design

Update Information:

This update fixes a frequent crash with glib 2.32 and some other bugs as 
outlined at http://emelfm2.net/wiki/ChangeLog

ChangeLog:

* Tue Apr 24 2012 Christoph Wickert 

dracut Warning: Unable to process initqueue was Re: F17 Rawhide iisues...

2012-04-25 Thread Rob Healey
 Greetings All:

I was asked to write out what message/ error that I was getting on my
screen before the dracut shell, so here it is:

It's this bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=814625

I have followed this bug down to the last comment!  It does work!!!

Latest dracut: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=315269
Latest kernel: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=315001

Steps I followed are:
1) yum install fedora-release-rawhide
2) Download dracut from the link above...
3) yum localupdate dracut-018-37.git20120425.fc18.1
4) yum update
5) reboot

Wait a while and ignore the warnings as it will boot...

Sincerely yours,
Rob G. Healey

There is a workaround in comment 22.  But if you can help with some of the 
testing,
Harald has suggested in: comment 19

-- 
Regards,
Frank
Jack of all, fubars
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

OpenStack on F17

2012-04-25 Thread Tommy Pham
Hi,

I'm trying to install OpenStack on F17 using Getting Started with
OpenStack wiki but having some issues (note that the DB is on a
different system):

1) nova db sync doesn't create the table migrate_version  (bug 816424)
2) glance-manage db_sync ONLY creates the table migrate_version
3) keystone-manage db_sync doesn't create the table migrate_version

Is anyone having the same issues?

Thanks,
Tommy
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

[Test-Announce] ABRT Test Day tomorrow - 2012-Apr-26

2012-04-25 Thread Michal Nowak

Friends of ABRT, Quality Engineers, fellow testers -

There's a Test Day going on tomorrow, Thursday 2012-Apr-26:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2012-04-26_ABRT_and_deduplication_service

Looking at ABRT v2.0.10 (and related components) in Fedora 17 (see the 
feature page at 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ABRTBacktraceDeduplication).


As always, the event is in #fedora-test-day in Freenode IRC, and all the
test instructions are on the Wiki. There will be a good turnout of
developers, so it's a great chance to help shake out any remaining ABRT
bugs for Fedora 17.

Please help out if you have a chance!

Thanks,
Richard  Michal
___
test-announce mailing list
test-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce