lightdm on Fedora 18
Has anyone tried to change the background image when using lightdm? Using the 'background' option in the lightdm-gtk-greeter.conf file is not giving the desired output. Instead of the image, only a black background shows up. Is anyone else seeing this? nonamedotc. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Fedora 18 updates-testing report
The following Fedora 18 Security updates need testing: Age URL 1 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-18146/xen-4.2.0-4.fc18 37 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-15716/libxslt-1.1.27-2.fc18 6 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-17513/system-config-users-1.3.1-1.fc18 5 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-17907/cups-pk-helper-0.2.4-1.fc18 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-18278/mod_security_crs-2.2.6-3.fc18,mod_security-2.7.1-3.fc18 5 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-17949/ruby-1.9.3.327-22.fc18 34 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-15996/cobbler-2.4.0-beta2.fc18 34 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-15987/thunderbird-16.0.1-1.fc18 1 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-18185/python-django-horizon-2012.2-4.fc18 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-18280/cgit-0.9.1-1.fc18 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-18264/bugzilla-4.2.4-1.fc18 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-17798/kde-settings-4.9-15.fc18.1 15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-16646/viewvc-1.1.17-2.fc18 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-18273/mantis-1.2.12-1.fc18 6 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-17797/system-config-date-1.10.3-1.fc18,system-config-nfs-1.4.1-1.fc18 6 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-17834/cumin-0.1.5522-4.fc18 The following Fedora 18 Critical Path updates have yet to be approved: Age URL 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-18263/xkeyboard-config-2.6-5.fc18 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-18258/accerciser-3.6.2-1.fc18,anjuta-3.6.2-1.fc18,at-spi2-atk-2.6.2-1.fc18,at-spi2-core-2.6.2-1.fc18,baobab-3.6.2-2.fc18,brasero-3.6.1-1.fc18,cheese-3.6.2-1.fc18,control-center-3.6.3-1.fc18,dconf-0.14.1-3.fc18,devhelp-3.6.1-1.fc18,empathy-3.6.2-1.fc18,eog-3.6.2-1.fc18,evolution-3.6.2-2.fc18,evolution-data-server-3.6.2-1.fc18,evolution-ews-3.6.1-1.fc18,evolution-mapi-3.6.2-1.fc18,file-roller-3.6.2-1.fc18,gcalctool-6.6.2-1.fc18,gcr-3.6.2-1.fc18,gdk-pixbuf2-2.26.5-1.fc18,gdm-3.6.2-1.fc18,gedit-3.6.2-1.fc18,glib2-2.34.2-1.fc18,glibmm24-2.34.1-1.fc18,glib-networking-2.34.2-1.fc18,glom-1.22.1-1.fc18,gmime-2.6.12-1.fc18,gnome-contacts-3.6.2-1.fc18,gnome-desktop3-3.6.2-1.fc18,gnome-devel-docs-3.6.2-1.fc18,gnome-documents-3.6.2-1.fc18,gnome-font-viewer-3.6.1-1.fc18,gnome-icon-theme-3.6.2-1.fc18,gnome-icon-theme-extras-3.6.2-1.fc18,gnome-icon-theme-symbolic-3.6.2-1.fc18,gnome-keyring-3.6.2-1.fc18,gnome-menus-3.6.1-1.fc18,gnome-online-accounts-3.6.2-1.fc18,gnome-packagekit-3.6.1-1.fc18,gnome-panel-3.6.2-1.fc18,gnome-screenshot-3.6.1-1.fc18,gnome-session-3.6.2-2.fc18,gnome-settings-daemon-3.6.3-1.fc18,gnome-shell-3.6.2-2.fc18,gnome-system-log-3.6.1-1.fc18,gnome-themes-standard-3.6.2-1.fc18,gnome-user-docs-3.6.2-1.fc18,gnote-3.6.1-1.fc18,gobject-introspection-1.34.2-1.fc18,grilo-0.2.3-1.fc18,grilo-plugins-0.2.3-1.fc18,gsettings-desktop-schemas-3.6.1-1.fc18,gtk3-3.6.2-1.fc18,gtkhtml3-4.6.1-1.fc18,gucharmap-3.6.1-1.fc18,gvfs-1.14.2-1.fc18,libcroco-0.6.8-1.fc18,libgdl-3.6.2-1.fc18,libgee06-0.6.6.1-1.fc18,libgweather-3.6.2-1.fc18,libsoup-2.40.2-1.fc18,libwnck3-3.4.4-1.fc18,libxml++-2.36.0-1.fc18,mutter-3.6.2-1.fc18,nautilus-3.6.3-1.fc18,orca-3.6.3-1.fc18,pango-1.32.2-1.fc18,pangox-compat-0.0.2-1.fc18,pyatspi-2.6.0-1.fc18,pygobject3-3.4.2-2.fc18,seahorse-3.6.3-1.fc18,seahorse-sharing-3.6.1-1.fc18,sushi-3.6.1-1.fc18,tracker-0.14.4-1.fc18,vala-0.18.1-1.fc18,vinagre-3.6.2-1.fc18,vino-3.6.2-1.fc18,vte3-0.34.2-1.fc18,yelp-3.6.2-1.fc18 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-18260/xorg-x11-server-utils-7.5-14.fc18 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-18259/policycoreutils-2.1.13-33.fc18 1 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-18192/harfbuzz-0.9.6-1.fc18 1 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-18195/ibus-1.4.99.20121109-1.fc18 1 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-18180/gzip-1.5-3.fc18 1 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-18148/openbox-3.5.0-9.fc18 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-18095/poppler-0.20.2-9.fc18 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-18101/texinfo-4.13a-18.fc18 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-18105/anaconda-18.29-1.fc18 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-18112/ppp-2.4.5-25.fc18 5 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-17954/libtasn1-2.14-1.fc18,gnutls-2.12.21-1.fc18 3 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-17931/python-slip-0.2.24-1.fc18 5 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-17907/cups-pk-helper-0.2.4-1.fc18 5 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-17892/iso-codes-3.
Re: OT: F18 Anaconda needs Fedup?
On Thu, 2012-11-15 at 09:23 +, Frank Murphy wrote: > Does anaconda need fedup? > if no: > http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/opensource/fedora-18-release-delayed-for-the-seventh-time/3968 > > I know (e)paper doesn't refuse ink, > but Who would be the "voice of Fedora to comment\reply to > inaccuracies if any. Marketing? (not subbed as yet) I've written to Jack. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: OT: F18 Anaconda needs Fedup?
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Frank Murphy wrote: > On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 12:28:58 +0100 > "tim.laurid...@gmail.com" wrote: > > > Will as written about the background for fedup > > > > http://ohjeezlinux.wordpress.com/2012/11/13/fedup-a-little-background/ > > > > Tim > > Not having looked at the src. > (might as well be looking up a ducks arse) > > Is it good old yum doing the heavy downloading in the background. > -- > test mailing list > test@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test > Yes, it is yum doing the package download and the updater is using only rpm running in a dracut initramfs Tim -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: OT: F18 Anaconda needs Fedup?
On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 12:28:58 +0100 "tim.laurid...@gmail.com" wrote: > Will as written about the background for fedup > > http://ohjeezlinux.wordpress.com/2012/11/13/fedup-a-little-background/ > > Tim Not having looked at the src. (might as well be looking up a ducks arse) Is it good old yum doing the heavy downloading in the background. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: OT: F18 Anaconda needs Fedup?
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Frank Murphy wrote: > On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 10:43:03 +0100 > drago01 wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:23 AM, Frank Murphy > > wrote: > > > Does anaconda need fedup? > > > > No. > > > The article does not claim that anaconda needs fedup. > > Speed reading again, it was this caught my eye > "The biggest problem with Anaconda is the fedup tool" > > -- > Regards, > Frank > He said unto Lazarus "Come forth", he came fifth. > -- > test mailing list > test@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test > Will as written about the background for fedup http://ohjeezlinux.wordpress.com/2012/11/13/fedup-a-little-background/ Tim -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: OT: F18 Anaconda needs Fedup?
On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 10:43:03 +0100 drago01 wrote: > On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:23 AM, Frank Murphy > wrote: > > Does anaconda need fedup? > > No. > The article does not claim that anaconda needs fedup. Speed reading again, it was this caught my eye "The biggest problem with Anaconda is the fedup tool" -- Regards, Frank He said unto Lazarus "Come forth", he came fifth. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: OT: F18 Anaconda needs Fedup?
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:23 AM, Frank Murphy wrote: > Does anaconda need fedup? No. > if no: > http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/opensource/fedora-18-release-delayed-for-the-seventh-time/3968 > > I know (e)paper doesn't refuse ink, > but Who would be the "voice of Fedora to comment\reply to > inaccuracies if any. Marketing? (not subbed as yet) The article does not claim that anaconda needs fedup. fedup is needed because the new anaconda no longer handles upgrades, so a new tool had to be written. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
OT: F18 Anaconda needs Fedup?
Does anaconda need fedup? if no: http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/opensource/fedora-18-release-delayed-for-the-seventh-time/3968 I know (e)paper doesn't refuse ink, but Who would be the "voice of Fedora to comment\reply to inaccuracies if any. Marketing? (not subbed as yet) -- Regards Frank -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
