Re: Bugzapper is inactive?
Thanks both. Sent from Subor Gameplayer -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
rawhide report: 20130408 changes
Compose started at Mon Apr 8 08:15:20 UTC 2013 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [TurboGears2] TurboGears2-2.1.4-5.fc19.noarch requires python-webob = 0:1.1.1 [aeolus-conductor] aeolus-conductor-0.10.6-2.fc19.noarch requires ruby(abi) = 0:1.9.1 [alexandria] alexandria-0.6.9-4.fc19.noarch requires ruby(abi) = 0:1.9.1 [amide] amide-1.0.0-4.fc19.x86_64 requires libvolpack.so.1()(64bit) [clementine] clementine-1.1.1-1.fc19.x86_64 requires libprotobuf.so.7()(64bit) clementine-1.1.1-1.fc19.x86_64 requires libimobiledevice.so.3()(64bit) [connman] connman-1.5-4.fc19.i686 requires libxtables.so.7 connman-1.5-4.fc19.i686 requires libgnutls.so.26(GNUTLS_1_4) connman-1.5-4.fc19.i686 requires libgnutls.so.26 connman-1.5-4.fc19.x86_64 requires libxtables.so.7()(64bit) connman-1.5-4.fc19.x86_64 requires libgnutls.so.26(GNUTLS_1_4)(64bit) connman-1.5-4.fc19.x86_64 requires libgnutls.so.26()(64bit) [deltacloud-core] deltacloud-core-1.0.5-2.fc19.noarch requires ruby(abi) = 0:1.9.1 [dragonegg] dragonegg-3.1-19.fc19.x86_64 requires gcc = 0:4.7.2-9.fc19 [eclipse] 1:eclipse-tests-4.3.0-0.30.fc20.x86_64 requires osgi(org.eclipse.releng.tools) [eruby] eruby-1.0.5-19.fc18.x86_64 requires libruby.so.1.9()(64bit) eruby-libs-1.0.5-19.fc18.i686 requires ruby(abi) = 0:1.9.0 eruby-libs-1.0.5-19.fc18.i686 requires libruby.so.1.9 eruby-libs-1.0.5-19.fc18.x86_64 requires ruby(abi) = 0:1.9.0 eruby-libs-1.0.5-19.fc18.x86_64 requires libruby.so.1.9()(64bit) [flowcanvas] flowcanvas-0.7.1-8.fc18.i686 requires libgraph.so.5 flowcanvas-0.7.1-8.fc18.x86_64 requires libgraph.so.5()(64bit) [gcc-python-plugin] gcc-python2-debug-plugin-0.11-1.fc19.x86_64 requires gcc = 0:4.7.2-8.fc19 gcc-python2-plugin-0.11-1.fc19.x86_64 requires gcc = 0:4.7.2-8.fc19 gcc-python3-debug-plugin-0.11-1.fc19.x86_64 requires gcc = 0:4.7.2-8.fc19 gcc-python3-plugin-0.11-1.fc19.x86_64 requires gcc = 0:4.7.2-8.fc19 [gnome-applets] 1:gnome-applets-3.5.92-3.fc18.x86_64 requires libgweather-3.so.1()(64bit) [gnome-panel] gnome-panel-3.6.2-6.fc19.x86_64 requires libgnome-desktop-3.so.5()(64bit) gnome-panel-devel-3.6.2-6.fc19.i686 requires libgnome-desktop-3.so.5 gnome-panel-devel-3.6.2-6.fc19.x86_64 requires libgnome-desktop-3.so.5()(64bit) [gnome-pie] gnome-pie-0.5.3-3.20120826git1b93e1.fc19.x86_64 requires libbamf3.so.0()(64bit) [gnomint] gnomint-1.2.1-5.fc18.x86_64 requires libgnutls.so.26(GNUTLS_2_8)(64bit) gnomint-1.2.1-5.fc18.x86_64 requires libgnutls.so.26(GNUTLS_1_4)(64bit) gnomint-1.2.1-5.fc18.x86_64 requires libgnutls.so.26()(64bit) [gooddata-cl] gooddata-cl-1.2.56-2.fc19.noarch requires gdata-java [kawa] 1:kawa-1.11-5.fc19.x86_64 requires servlet25 [kazehakase] kazehakase-webkit-0.5.8-15.svn3873_trunk.fc20.1.x86_64 requires webKitgtk = 0:1.1.1 [libkolab] php-kolab-0.4.1-3.fc19.x86_64 requires php(zend-abi) = 0:20100525-x86-64 php-kolab-0.4.1-3.fc19.x86_64 requires php(api) = 0:20100412-x86-64 [mapserver] php-mapserver-6.0.3-9.fc19.x86_64 requires php(zend-abi) = 0:20100525-x86-64 php-mapserver-6.0.3-9.fc19.x86_64 requires php(api) = 0:20100412-x86-64 [matreshka] matreshka-0.3.0-3.fc19.i686 requires libgnat-4.7.so matreshka-0.3.0-3.fc19.x86_64 requires libgnat-4.7.so()(64bit) matreshka-amf-0.3.0-3.fc19.i686 requires libgnat-4.7.so matreshka-amf-0.3.0-3.fc19.x86_64 requires libgnat-4.7.so()(64bit) matreshka-amf-mofext-0.3.0-3.fc19.i686 requires libgnat-4.7.so matreshka-amf-mofext-0.3.0-3.fc19.x86_64 requires libgnat-4.7.so()(64bit) matreshka-amf-ocl-0.3.0-3.fc19.i686 requires libgnat-4.7.so matreshka-amf-ocl-0.3.0-3.fc19.x86_64 requires libgnat-4.7.so()(64bit) matreshka-amf-uml-0.3.0-3.fc19.i686 requires libgnat-4.7.so matreshka-amf-uml-0.3.0-3.fc19.x86_64 requires libgnat-4.7.so()(64bit) matreshka-amf-utp-0.3.0-3.fc19.i686 requires libgnat-4.7.so matreshka-amf-utp-0.3.0-3.fc19.x86_64 requires libgnat-4.7.so()(64bit) matreshka-fastcgi-0.3.0-3.fc19.i686 requires libgnat-4.7.so matreshka-fastcgi-0.3.0-3.fc19.i686 requires libgnarl-4.7.so matreshka-fastcgi-0.3.0-3.fc19.x86_64 requires libgnat-4.7.so()(64bit) matreshka-fastcgi-0.3.0-3.fc19.x86_64 requires libgnarl-4.7.so()(64bit) matreshka-sql-core-0.3.0-3.fc19.i686 requires libgnat-4.7.so matreshka-sql-core-0.3.0-3.fc19.x86_64 requires libgnat-4.7.so()(64bit) matreshka-sql-postgresql-0.3.0-3.fc19.i686 requires libgnat-4.7.so matreshka-sql-postgresql-0.3.0-3.fc19.x86_64 requires libgnat-4.7.so()(64bit) matreshka-sql-sqlite-0.3.0-3.fc19.i686 requires libgnat-4.7.so
Rawhide dead slow on my laptop
Hi, I don't know where to start for debugging but current rawhide on my SandyBridge laptop is barely usable. Even a window switch takes 1-2 seconds. I looked over powertop and top outputs, load average when idle (even no gnome-terminal, ran the commands on VT) can be between 0.8-1.1. Xorg is generally at the of top output, 30-40% CPU usage on average. I also see some irq related stuff for iwlwifi in top output. I was passing enable_rc6=0 to i915 but removed that but that didn't help too. Is there a known issue with 3.9 kernel that you are aware of? What should I investigate further before opening a bug in bugzilla? Thanks. -- Ozan Çağlayan Research Assistant Galatasaray University - Computer Engineering Dept. http://www.ozancaglayan.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Rawhide dead slow on my laptop
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 4:26 AM, Ozan Çağlayan ozan...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I don't know where to start for debugging but current rawhide on my SandyBridge laptop is barely usable. Even a window switch takes 1-2 seconds. I looked over powertop and top outputs, load average when idle (even no gnome-terminal, ran the commands on VT) can be between 0.8-1.1. Xorg is generally at the of top output, 30-40% CPU usage on average. I also see some irq related stuff for iwlwifi in top output. I was passing enable_rc6=0 to i915 but removed that but that didn't help too. Is there a known issue with 3.9 kernel that you are aware of? What should I investigate further before opening a bug in bugzilla? Rawhide kernels have debugging options enabled, which can cause significant slowdowns in many situations. Try using the rawhide-kernel-nodebug repository to get non-debug kernels for Rawhide and see if your problems persist: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/RawhideKernelNodebug -T.C. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Rawhide dead slow on my laptop
Rawhide kernels have debugging options enabled, which can cause significant slowdowns in many situations. Try using the rawhide-kernel-nodebug repository to get non-debug kernels for Rawhide and see if your problems persist: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/RawhideKernelNodebug Ah I knew about that but completely forgot it. Thanks for this valuable pointer :) -- Ozan Çağlayan Research Assistant Galatasaray University - Computer Engineering Dept. http://www.ozancaglayan.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
F-19 Branched report: 20130408 changes
Compose started at Mon Apr 8 09:15:19 UTC 2013 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [aeolus-conductor] aeolus-conductor-0.10.6-2.fc19.noarch requires ruby(abi) = 0:1.9.1 [alexandria] alexandria-0.6.9-4.fc19.noarch requires ruby(abi) = 0:1.9.1 [amide] amide-1.0.0-4.fc19.x86_64 requires libvolpack.so.1()(64bit) [clementine] clementine-1.1.1-1.fc19.x86_64 requires libprotobuf.so.7()(64bit) clementine-1.1.1-1.fc19.x86_64 requires libimobiledevice.so.3()(64bit) [connman] connman-1.5-4.fc19.i686 requires libxtables.so.7 connman-1.5-4.fc19.i686 requires libgnutls.so.26(GNUTLS_1_4) connman-1.5-4.fc19.i686 requires libgnutls.so.26 connman-1.5-4.fc19.x86_64 requires libxtables.so.7()(64bit) connman-1.5-4.fc19.x86_64 requires libgnutls.so.26(GNUTLS_1_4)(64bit) connman-1.5-4.fc19.x86_64 requires libgnutls.so.26()(64bit) [deltacloud-core] deltacloud-core-1.0.5-2.fc19.noarch requires ruby(abi) = 0:1.9.1 [denemo] denemo-0.9.4-0.fc18.x86_64 requires libgtksourceview-3.0.so.0()(64bit) [dragonegg] dragonegg-3.1-19.fc19.x86_64 requires gcc = 0:4.7.2-9.fc19 [eruby] eruby-1.0.5-19.fc18.x86_64 requires libruby.so.1.9()(64bit) eruby-libs-1.0.5-19.fc18.i686 requires ruby(abi) = 0:1.9.0 eruby-libs-1.0.5-19.fc18.i686 requires libruby.so.1.9 eruby-libs-1.0.5-19.fc18.x86_64 requires ruby(abi) = 0:1.9.0 eruby-libs-1.0.5-19.fc18.x86_64 requires libruby.so.1.9()(64bit) [fawkes] fawkes-firevision-0.5.0-5.fc19.i686 requires libjpeg.so.8(LIBJPEG_8.0) fawkes-firevision-0.5.0-5.fc19.i686 requires libjpeg.so.8 fawkes-firevision-0.5.0-5.fc19.x86_64 requires libjpeg.so.8(LIBJPEG_8.0)(64bit) fawkes-firevision-0.5.0-5.fc19.x86_64 requires libjpeg.so.8()(64bit) fawkes-guis-0.5.0-5.fc19.i686 requires libgraph.so.5 fawkes-guis-0.5.0-5.fc19.x86_64 requires libgraph.so.5()(64bit) fawkes-plugin-clips-0.5.0-5.fc19.i686 requires libclipsmm.so.2 fawkes-plugin-clips-0.5.0-5.fc19.x86_64 requires libclipsmm.so.2()(64bit) fawkes-plugin-player-0.5.0-5.fc19.x86_64 requires libgeos-3.3.6.so()(64bit) fawkes-plugin-player-0.5.0-5.fc19.x86_64 requires libboost_thread-mt.so.1.50.0()(64bit) fawkes-plugin-player-0.5.0-5.fc19.x86_64 requires libboost_system-mt.so.1.50.0()(64bit) fawkes-plugin-player-0.5.0-5.fc19.x86_64 requires libboost_signals-mt.so.1.50.0()(64bit) fawkes-plugin-tabletop-objects-0.5.0-5.fc19.x86_64 requires libboost_thread-mt.so.1.50.0()(64bit) fawkes-plugin-tabletop-objects-0.5.0-5.fc19.x86_64 requires libboost_system-mt.so.1.50.0()(64bit) [flowcanvas] flowcanvas-0.7.1-8.fc18.i686 requires libgraph.so.5 flowcanvas-0.7.1-8.fc18.x86_64 requires libgraph.so.5()(64bit) [gcc-python-plugin] gcc-python2-debug-plugin-0.11-1.fc19.x86_64 requires gcc = 0:4.7.2-8.fc19 gcc-python2-plugin-0.11-1.fc19.x86_64 requires gcc = 0:4.7.2-8.fc19 gcc-python3-debug-plugin-0.11-1.fc19.x86_64 requires gcc = 0:4.7.2-8.fc19 gcc-python3-plugin-0.11-1.fc19.x86_64 requires gcc = 0:4.7.2-8.fc19 [gdcm] gdcm-2.0.18-6.fc18.i686 requires libpoppler.so.26 gdcm-2.0.18-6.fc18.x86_64 requires libpoppler.so.26()(64bit) [gearbox] gearbox-10.11-3.fc19.i686 requires libIceUtil.so.35b gearbox-10.11-3.fc19.x86_64 requires libIceUtil.so.35b()(64bit) [gnome-applets] 1:gnome-applets-3.5.92-3.fc18.x86_64 requires libgweather-3.so.1()(64bit) [gnome-panel] gnome-panel-3.6.2-6.fc19.x86_64 requires libgnome-desktop-3.so.5()(64bit) gnome-panel-devel-3.6.2-6.fc19.i686 requires libgnome-desktop-3.so.5 gnome-panel-devel-3.6.2-6.fc19.x86_64 requires libgnome-desktop-3.so.5()(64bit) [gnome-pie] gnome-pie-0.5.3-3.20120826git1b93e1.fc19.x86_64 requires libbamf3.so.0()(64bit) [gnomint] gnomint-1.2.1-5.fc18.x86_64 requires libgnutls.so.26(GNUTLS_2_8)(64bit) gnomint-1.2.1-5.fc18.x86_64 requires libgnutls.so.26(GNUTLS_1_4)(64bit) gnomint-1.2.1-5.fc18.x86_64 requires libgnutls.so.26()(64bit) [gooddata-cl] gooddata-cl-1.2.56-2.fc19.noarch requires gdata-java [gorm] gorm-1.2.18-1.fc19.i686 requires libgnustep-gui.so.0.22 gorm-1.2.18-1.fc19.x86_64 requires libgnustep-gui.so.0.22()(64bit) [kawa] 1:kawa-1.11-5.fc19.x86_64 requires servlet25 [libkolab] php-kolab-0.4.1-3.fc19.x86_64 requires php(zend-abi) = 0:20100525-x86-64 php-kolab-0.4.1-3.fc19.x86_64 requires php(api) = 0:20100412-x86-64 [matreshka] matreshka-0.3.0-3.fc19.i686 requires libgnat-4.7.so matreshka-0.3.0-3.fc19.x86_64 requires libgnat-4.7.so()(64bit) matreshka-amf-0.3.0-3.fc19.i686 requires libgnat-4.7.so matreshka-amf-0.3.0-3.fc19.x86_64 requires libgnat-4.7.so()(64bit) matreshka-amf-mofext-0.3.0-3.fc19.i686
Re: Rawhide dead slow on my laptop
On 04/08/13 06:52, Ozan Çağlayan wrote: Rawhide kernels have debugging options enabled, which can cause significant slowdowns in many situations. Try using the rawhide-kernel-nodebug repository to get non-debug kernels for Rawhide and see if your problems persist: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/RawhideKernelNodebug Ah I knew about that but completely forgot it. Thanks for this valuable pointer :) -- Ozan ÇaÄŸlayan Research Assistant Galatasaray University - Computer Engineering Dept. http://www.ozancaglayan.com What video driver are using, nouveau, nvidia, or something else? What are your X settings? If X is consistently high then I would suspect the video driver. I have seen the same behavior using nouveau under 3.9 kernel. I have *not* seen that behavior using nvidia under the 3.9 driver but I do have other issues using nvidia (like machine hangs and X crashes). Kevin -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Rawhide dead slow on my laptop
It has a Intel 2nd generation video controller (sandy bridge family) and the driver is i915 which should be the less problematic driver I think. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Rawhide dead slow on my laptop
On Mon, 8 Apr 2013 04:36:46 -0700 T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com wrote: Rawhide kernels have debugging options enabled, which can cause significant slowdowns in many situations. Try using the rawhide-kernel-nodebug repository to get non-debug kernels for Rawhide and see if your problems persist: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/RawhideKernelNodebug Also, you could try disabling slug_debug on boot with the normal rawhide kernel. That seems to be where most of the performance gets lost. Just add slub_debug=-' to your boot line or /etc/grub2.cfg. kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
[Test-Announce] Fedora 19 Alpha Go/No-Go Meeting, Thursday, April 11 @ 17:00 UTC
Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-1 for this important meeting, wherein we shall determine the readiness of the Fedora 19 Alpha. Thursday, April 11, 2013 17:00 UTC (1 PM EDT, 10 AM PDT, 19:00 CEST) Before each public release Development, QA and Release Engineering meet to determine if the release criteria are met for a particular release. This meeting is called the Go/No-Go Meeting. Verifying that the Release criteria are met is the responsibility of the QA Team. For more details about this meeting see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Go_No_Go_Meeting In the meantime, keep an eye on the Fedora 19 Alpha Blocker list: http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/milestone/19/alpha/buglist Reminder: the Readiness meeting follows the Go/No-Go meeting two hours later. Jaroslav ___ test-announce mailing list test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
F19 Alpha Blocker Bug Review #5 Minutes
= #fedora-blocker-review: f19alpha-blocker-review-5 = Minutes: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2013-04-08/f19alpha-blocker-review-5.2013-04-08-16.01.html Minutes (text): http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2013-04-08/f19alpha-blocker-review-5.2013-04-08-16.01.txt Log: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2013-04-08/f19alpha-blocker-review-5.2013-04-08-16.01.log.html Meeting summary --- * Roll Call (tflink, 16:01:10) * Introduction (tflink, 16:06:13) * Our purpose in this meeting is to review proposed blocker and nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept them, and to monitor the progress of fixing existing accepted blocker and nice-to-have bugs. (tflink, 16:06:26) * We'll be following the process outlined at: (tflink, 16:06:32) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting (tflink, 16:06:32) * The bugs up for review today are available at: (tflink, 16:06:41) * LINK: http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current (tflink, 16:06:41) * The criteria for release blocking bugs can be found at: (tflink, 16:06:48) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_19_Alpha_Release_Criteria (tflink, 16:06:48) * Up for review today, we have: (tflink, 16:06:53) * 3 Proposed Blockers (tflink, 16:07:02) * 9 Accepted Blockers (tflink, 16:07:02) * 11 Proposed Freeze Exceptions (tflink, 16:07:02) * 4 Accepted Freeze Exceptions (tflink, 16:07:02) * (888307) Inserting an F18 DVD does not automatically add the DVD repo to running gnome3 installation (tflink, 16:08:17) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=888307 (tflink, 16:08:20) * Proposed Blocker, gnome-settings-daemon, NEW (tflink, 16:08:22) * AGREED: 888307 - RejectedBlocker - This does not violate any alpha release criteria and is thus rejected as a blocker for F19 alpha (tflink, 16:11:49) * (946964) after default install of 19 Alpha TC3 in KVM, can't log in from gdm (tflink, 16:12:01) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=946964 (tflink, 16:12:04) * Proposed Blocker, gnome-shell, NEW (tflink, 16:12:07) * AGREED: 946964 - RejectedBlocker - While this has the potential to be a release blocking bug, it appears to be somewhat system specific at the moment and not widespread enough to justify release blocking status. Please re-propose as a blocker if it turns out to be more severe or widespread. (tflink, 16:16:51) * (949315) KDM greeter fails with missing Spherical Cow theme files (tflink, 16:17:00) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=949315 (tflink, 16:17:03) * Proposed Blocker, spherical-cow-kde-theme, NEW (tflink, 16:17:06) * AGREED: 949315 - RejectedBlocker - This appears to be system/site specific or it has already been fixed in F19 updates-testing. Either way, it does not warrant release blocking status at this time and is thus rejected as a blocker for F19 alpha. (tflink, 16:19:55) * (947261) AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'memInstalled' (anaconda fails to boot with 512mb ram in TEXT MODE) (tflink, 16:23:42) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=947261 (tflink, 16:23:46) * Proposed Freeze Exceptions, anaconda, MODIFIED (tflink, 16:23:48) * LINK: https://lists.fedorahosted.org/pipermail/anaconda-patches/2013-April/003640.html (adamw, 16:25:09) * AGREED: 947261 - AcceptedFreezeException - This is a small, restricted change that fixes a warning message for low-memory installs - would be good to fix now (tflink, 16:30:21) * (949323) Gnome Initial Setup does not offer opportunity to create non-root Administrator (tflink, 16:30:50) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=949323 (tflink, 16:30:53) * Proposed Freeze Exceptions, gnome-initial-setup, MODIFIED (tflink, 16:30:55) * AGREED: 949323 - RejectedFreezeException - This appears to have been at least partially by design and not severe enough to justify pulling past F19 alpha freeze. Thus, it is rejected as a FreezeException for F19 alpha (tflink, 16:36:17) * (949106) libreoffice-core drags in both openjdk 1.7.0 and 1.8.0 (tflink, 16:36:27) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=949106 (tflink, 16:36:30) * Proposed Freeze Exceptions, libreoffice, ON_QA (tflink, 16:36:33) * AGREED: 949106 - AcceptedFreezeException - This fix reduces the size of the desktop spin to be properly sized - while not an F19 alpha release criterion, would be good to fix before alpha. (tflink, 16:42:23) * (924425) Assertion failed on ppc64: g_object_class_install_property: assertion `pspec-flags (G_PARAM_READABLE | G_PARAM_WRITABLE)' failed (tflink, 16:42:35) * LINK:
Re: Rawhide dead slow on my laptop
Also, you could try disabling slug_debug on boot with the normal I see you also have the tendency to call it SLUG instead of SLUB. It would be a more appropriate name, I think :-) -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Rawhide dead slow on my laptop
On Mon, 8 Apr 2013 13:57:43 -0400 (EDT) Kamil Paral kpa...@redhat.com wrote: Also, you could try disabling slug_debug on boot with the normal I see you also have the tendency to call it SLUG instead of SLUB. It would be a more appropriate name, I think :-) ha. Oops. yes, it's slub_debug. ;( Sorry for confusion. kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Cinnamon and F19
On Sat, Apr 06, 2013 at 10:35:32AM +0200, Joachim Backes wrote: sudo yum groupinstall 'Cinnamon Desktop' Loaded plugins: langpacks, refresh-packagekit Warning: environment Cinnamon Desktop does not exist. No packages in any requested group available to install or update Anybody sees this too, or has an explanation? Possibly a dumb question, but do you already have it installed? Running yum group info Cinnamon Desktop should list the groups and packages that the group contains, with a + before the packages which you don't already have installed (or for groups, those which contain packages you don't already have installed). That's assuming I'm reading it right, anyway. HTH, Nalin -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: F19 Alpha Blocker Bug Review #5 Minutes
I don't see any mention of Wine. It should be a blocker. KDE and Xfce can be used instead of Gnome, but there is no substitute for Wine. -- Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX c...@omen.com www.omen.com Developer of Industrial ZMODEM(Tm) for Embedded Applications Omen Technology Inc The High Reliability Software 10255 NW Old Cornelius Pass Portland OR 97231 503-614-0430 -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
RE: F19 Alpha Blocker Bug Review #5 Minutes
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 12:39:40 -0700 From: c...@omen.com To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: Re: F19 Alpha Blocker Bug Review #5 Minutes I don't see any mention of Wine. It should be a blocker. KDE and Xfce can be used instead of Gnome, but there is no substitute for Wine. -- Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX c...@omen.com www.omen.com Developer of Industrial ZMODEM(Tm) for Embedded Applications Omen Technology Inc The High Reliability Software 10255 NW Old Cornelius Pass Portland OR 97231 503-614-0430 Wine is not a release blocker, period. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: F19 Alpha Blocker Bug Review #5 Minutes
On 04/09/13 03:49, John Dulaney wrote: Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 12:39:40 -0700 From: c...@omen.com To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: Re: F19 Alpha Blocker Bug Review #5 Minutes I don't see any mention of Wine. It should be a blocker. KDE and Xfce can be used instead of Gnome, but there is no substitute for Wine. -- Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX c...@omen.com www.omen.com Developer of Industrial ZMODEM(Tm) for Embedded Applications Omen Technology Inc The High Reliability Software 10255 NW Old Cornelius Pass Portland OR 97231 503-614-0430 Wine is not a release blocker, period. Absolutely True. Besides, isn't Champagne preferred at release time? :-) :-) -- From now on, at least during winter time, Im going to blame all spelling an grammar erros on the cat sitting on my chest every time I sit down at the computer -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: F19 Alpha Blocker Bug Review #5 Minutes
On 04/08/2013 01:24 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 04/09/13 03:49, John Dulaney wrote: Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 12:39:40 -0700 From: c...@omen.com To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: Re: F19 Alpha Blocker Bug Review #5 Minutes I don't see any mention of Wine. It should be a blocker. KDE and Xfce can be used instead of Gnome, but there is no substitute for Wine. -- Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX c...@omen.com www.omen.com Developer of Industrial ZMODEM(Tm) for Embedded Applications Omen Technology Inc The High Reliability Software 10255 NW Old Cornelius Pass Portland OR 97231 503-614-0430 Wine is not a release blocker, period. Absolutely True. Besides, isn't Champagne preferred at release time? :-) :-) What should I use for running Win apps on Linux instead of Wine? -- Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX c...@omen.com www.omen.com Developer of Industrial ZMODEM(Tm) for Embedded Applications Omen Technology Inc The High Reliability Software 10255 NW Old Cornelius Pass Portland OR 97231 503-614-0430 -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: F19 Alpha Blocker Bug Review #5 Minutes
On 08/04/13 02:38 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote: What should I use for running Win apps on Linux instead of Wine? Not every possible capability of a Fedora system can be considered a release blocker. There isn't any obvious alternative to wine except an emulated copy of Windows (legitimate, of course!), but that doesn't make wine release blocking functionality. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: F19 Alpha Blocker Bug Review #5 Minutes
On 04/08/2013 07:39 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote: I don't see any mention of Wine. It should be a blocker. KDE and Xfce can be used instead of Gnome, but there is no substitute for Wine. Wine is not a blocker, let alone a alpha blocker and probably never will be a blocker. JBG -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Fedora 17 updates-testing report
The following Fedora 17 Security updates need testing: Age URL 276 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-10269/revelation-0.4.14-1.fc17 89 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-0455/fedora-business-cards-1-0.1.beta1.fc17 59 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-2143/rubygem-rdoc-3.12-5.fc17 55 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-2315/rubygem-rack-1.4.0-4.fc17 17 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-4234/stunnel-4.55-1.fc17 17 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-4174/glibc-2.15-59.fc17 15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-4296/tomcat6-6.0.36-1.fc17 12 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-4501/libxslt-1.1.28-1.fc17 10 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-4522/libarchive-3.0.4-3.fc17 9 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-4598/389-ds-base-1.2.11.20-1.fc17 9 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-4581/libuser-0.57.6-2.fc17 7 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-4619/polarssl-1.1.6-1.fc17 3 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-4827/haproxy-1.4.23-1.fc17 3 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-4834/mod_security-2.7.3-1.fc17 3 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-4818/clamav-0.97.7-1.fc17 3 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-4927/xen-4.1.4-7.fc17 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-4983/seamonkey-2.17-1.fc17 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-4980/drupal7-ctools-1.3-1.fc17 1 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-5051/gsi-openssh-5.9p1-11.fc17 The following Fedora 17 Critical Path updates have yet to be approved: Age URL 229 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-12509/PackageKit-0.7.6-1.fc17 58 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-2163/policycoreutils-2.1.13-27.3.fc17 37 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-3304/libvpx-1.2.0-1.fc17 17 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-4140/audit-2.2.3-2.fc17 15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-4308/libnotify-0.7.5-5.fc17 12 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-4501/libxslt-1.1.28-1.fc17 10 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-4522/libarchive-3.0.4-3.fc17 9 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-4581/libuser-0.57.6-2.fc17 5 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-4730/koji-1.8.0-1.fc17 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-5001/selinux-policy-3.10.0-169.fc17 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-4958/cryptopp-5.6.2-2.fc17 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-4977/livecd-tools-17.16-1.fc17 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora 17 updates-testing aircrack-ng-1.1-7.20130402svn.fc17 asciiquarium-1.1-1.fc17 dvb-apps-1.1.2-4.1488.f3a70b206f0f.fc17 httpie-0.4.1-3.fc17 kscreen-0.0.81-2.fc17 libkscreen-0.0.81-1.fc17 maven-3.0.4-14.3.fc17 meanwhile-1.1.0-10.fc17 php-pecl-memcache-3.0.8-1.fc17 rawtherapee-4.0.10-1.fc17 rubygem-foreigner-1.4.1-1.fc17 whois-5.0.23-1.fc17 Details about builds: aircrack-ng-1.1-7.20130402svn.fc17 (FEDORA-2013-5170) 802.11 (wireless) sniffer and WEP/WPA-PSK key cracker Update Information: Update to new SVN snapshot to fix ath9k error ChangeLog: * Tue Apr 2 2013 Till Maas opensou...@till.name - 1.1-7 - Updated to new SVN snapshot (Red Hat Bugzilla #881342) - Updated manpages locations - Add new BR: libpcap-devel * Wed Feb 13 2013 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org - 1.1-6.20120904svn - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_19_Mass_Rebuild References: [ 1 ] Bug #881342 - ath9k error: Device or resource busy (-16) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881342 asciiquarium-1.1-1.fc17 (FEDORA-2013-5150) ASCII art aquarium/sea animation Update Information: Initial package release. References: [ 1 ] Bug #918129 - Review Request: asciiquarium - sea animation in ASCII art. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=918129
[Test-Announce] Fedora 19 Alpha Release Candidate 1 (RC1) Available Now!
*IMPORTANT*: Same images as with 19 Alpha TC3, TC4, and TC5 are over their size targets (all DVDs and Lives with the exception of Live KDE and Live SoaS). As per the Fedora 19 schedule [1], Fedora 19 Alpha Release Candidate 1 (RC1) is now available for testing. Content information, including changes, can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5545#comment:15 . Please see the following pages for download links (including delta ISOs) and testing instructions. Normally dl.fedoraproject.org should provide the fastest download, but download-ib01.fedoraproject.org is available as a mirror (with an approximately 1 hour lag) in case of trouble. To use it, just replace dl with download-ib01 in the download URL. Installation: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test Base: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Base_Test Desktop: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Desktop_Test Ideally, all Alpha priority test cases for Installation [2], Base [3], and Desktop [4] should pass in order to meet the Alpha Release Criteria [5]. Help is available on #fedora-qa on irc.freenode.net [6], or on the test list [7]. Create Fedora 19 Alpha test composes (TC) and release candidates (RC) https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5545 Current Blocker and NTH bugs: http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current [1] http://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-19/f-19-quality-tasks.html [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Installation_validation_testing [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Base_validation_testing [4] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Desktop_validation_testing [5] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_19_Alpha_Release_Criteria [6] irc://irc.freenode.net/fedora-qa [7] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ test-announce mailing list test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce-- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
2013-04-08 - Fedora QA Meeting - recap
As always, minutes and IRC transcript available on the wiki at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/20130408 Next meeting is scheduled for 2013-04-15 at 1500 UTC in #fedora-meeting. If you have topics you think we should bring up at the meeting, please add them to the Wiki page at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/20130415 . Thanks! TOPIC: Fedora 19 Alpha status === * #929403[1] and #928279[2] are known to be 'outstanding' blockers * dgilmore was out on the day of the meeting, may not be able to get next compose until tomorrow * karma needed for initial-setup-0.3.4-3.fc19[3] and libreport-2.1.3-2.fc19[4] * go/no-go was scheduled for Thursday at 17:00 UTC TOPIC: Test Days === * OpenStack Test Day[5] and Printing Test Day[6] both went ahead as planned without known problems * Translation (l10n) Test Day[7] looked to be pretty much ready, we needed to send out some announcements; kparal was preparing live images TOPIC: Open floor === N/A 1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=929403 2. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=928279 3. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-5141/systemd-201-1.fc19,initial-setup-0.3.4-3.fc19 4. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-5027/libreport-2.1.3-2.fc19 5. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2013-04-02_OpenStack 6. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2013-04-04_Printing 7. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2013-04-11_Translation_(l10n) -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.ne -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 19 Alpha Release Candidate 1 (RC1) Available Now!
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 7:43 PM, Andre Robatino robat...@fedoraproject.org wrote: *IMPORTANT*: Same images as with 19 Alpha TC3, TC4, and TC5 are over their size targets (all DVDs and Lives with the exception of Live KDE and Live SoaS). As per the Fedora 19 schedule [1], Fedora 19 Alpha Release Candidate 1 (RC1) is now available for testing. Just curious, what kernel version is included in this? FC -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 19 Alpha Release Candidate 1 (RC1) Available Now!
On 04/08/2013 09:42 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote: Just curious, what kernel version is included in this? FC [root@localhost ~]# uname -r 3.9.0-0.rc5.git1.301.fc19.x86_64 -- nonamedotc -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 19 Alpha Release Candidate 1 (RC1) Available Now!
On 08/04/13 07:52 PM, nonamedotc wrote: On 04/08/2013 09:42 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote: Just curious, what kernel version is included in this? FC [root@localhost ~]# uname -r 3.9.0-0.rc5.git1.301.fc19.x86_64 That is not what's in the Alpha RC1 images. They have 3.9.0-0.rc4.git0.1 . -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Fedora 19 Alpha status: blockers, karma requests etc
Hi folks! Time for the first blocker status mail of the Fedora 19 cycle. The tl;dr summary: Karma needed for: * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-5141/systemd-201-1.fc19,initial-setup-0.3.4-3.fc19 * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-5027/libreport-2.1.3-2.fc19 Input needed from blocker voters and developers on: * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=947142 QA folks, we need to complete the validation tests for RC1: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_19_Alpha_RC1_Install https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_19_Alpha_RC1_Desktop https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_19_Alpha_RC1_Base Longer version follows. I'm touching every wooden object in sight right now, but things are actually looking quite good for the Alpha. There are only two open accepted blocker bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=929403 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=926916 and both are in VERIFIED state, indicating that they have been confirmed fixed in Alpha RC1, but the updates need karma to be pushed stable to close the bugs. So if folks could provide karma on these updates: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-5141/systemd-201-1.fc19,initial-setup-0.3.4-3.fc19 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-5027/libreport-2.1.3-2.fc19 it would be very helpful. Both are relatively easy to test. For the systemd/initial-setup update, simply install Alpha RC1 and confirm that the initial-setup tool runs at first boot. It looks a lot like anaconda and lets you create a user account and set the root password if you did not already do so. The facts that it offers user account creation even if you already did it in anaconda, and that both it and gnome-initial-setup run on GNOME installs, are both known; they are bugs, but do not block the Alpha release. For the libreport update, check that, if anaconda crashes, you can file a bug on the crash by following the steps. In previous Alpha composes, this didn't work. If you can't make anaconda crash, there are instructions for faking a crash in the test case: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_save_traceback_to_bugzilla . We currently have only one proposed blocker bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=947142 input on that from blocker voters and relevant developers would be very helpful. It is quite hard to decide on the blocker status of the bug without some kind of information on how many UEFI systems it is likely to affect. Of course, the sooner a fix or workaround can be devised, the better. Aside from the above, we need to complete the Alpha level validation tests: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_19_Alpha_RC1_Install https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_19_Alpha_RC1_Desktop https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_19_Alpha_RC1_Base We already covered quite a lot of the ground with previous builds, but we need to make sure to check everything and catch any other lurking blockers. Thanks everyone, and let's hope we can get the Alpha out on time for once! Go/no-go is on Thursday, so we need to have a build fully tested without blockers by then. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
[Test-Announce] Fedora 19 Alpha Go/No-Go Meeting, Thursday, April 11 @ 17:00 UTC
Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-1 for this important meeting, wherein we shall determine the readiness of the Fedora 19 Alpha. Thursday, April 11, 2013 17:00 UTC (1 PM EDT, 10 AM PDT, 19:00 CEST) Before each public release Development, QA and Release Engineering meet to determine if the release criteria are met for a particular release. This meeting is called the Go/No-Go Meeting. Verifying that the Release criteria are met is the responsibility of the QA Team. For more details about this meeting see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Go_No_Go_Meeting In the meantime, keep an eye on the Fedora 19 Alpha Blocker list: http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/milestone/19/alpha/buglist Reminder: the Readiness meeting follows the Go/No-Go meeting two hours later. Jaroslav ___ test-announce mailing list test-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce
[Test-Announce] Fedora 19 Alpha Release Candidate 1 (RC1) Available Now!
*IMPORTANT*: Same images as with 19 Alpha TC3, TC4, and TC5 are over their size targets (all DVDs and Lives with the exception of Live KDE and Live SoaS). As per the Fedora 19 schedule [1], Fedora 19 Alpha Release Candidate 1 (RC1) is now available for testing. Content information, including changes, can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5545#comment:15 . Please see the following pages for download links (including delta ISOs) and testing instructions. Normally dl.fedoraproject.org should provide the fastest download, but download-ib01.fedoraproject.org is available as a mirror (with an approximately 1 hour lag) in case of trouble. To use it, just replace dl with download-ib01 in the download URL. Installation: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test Base: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Base_Test Desktop: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Desktop_Test Ideally, all Alpha priority test cases for Installation [2], Base [3], and Desktop [4] should pass in order to meet the Alpha Release Criteria [5]. Help is available on #fedora-qa on irc.freenode.net [6], or on the test list [7]. Create Fedora 19 Alpha test composes (TC) and release candidates (RC) https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5545 Current Blocker and NTH bugs: http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current [1] http://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-19/f-19-quality-tasks.html [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Installation_validation_testing [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Base_validation_testing [4] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Desktop_validation_testing [5] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_19_Alpha_Release_Criteria [6] irc://irc.freenode.net/fedora-qa [7] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ test-announce mailing list test-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce
