F19 - How to use alias network interface?

2013-05-21 Thread Cristian Sava
Hi all,
I need to have alias network interfaces.
What is the desired way to do this in F19?

My actual setup (without alias):
[root@physics sysconfig]# ls network-scripts/ifcfg-*
network-scripts/ifcfg-enp4s0  network-scripts/ifcfg-enp5s0
network-scripts/ifcfg-lo
[root@physics sysconfig]# cat network-scripts/ifcfg-enp4s0
TYPE=Ethernet
#BOOTPROTO=dhcp
BOOTPROTO=none
DEFROUTE=yes
IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL=no
IPV6INIT=yes
IPV6_AUTOCONF=yes
IPV6_DEFROUTE=yes
IPV6_PEERDNS=yes
IPV6_PEERROUTES=yes
IPV6_FAILURE_FATAL=no
NAME=enp4s0
UUID=4fd3476d-2423-4c26-99f9-28b5f6d18b05
ONBOOT=yes
HWADDR=00:08:54:41:46:01
PEERDNS=yes
PEERROUTES=yes
IPADDR=172.16.0.1
PREFIX=16
[root@physics sysconfig]# cat network-scripts/ifcfg-enp5s0
DOMAIN=central.ucv.ro
IPV6_PEERDNS=yes
IPV6INIT=yes
UUID=df0a5629-9f3f-4c85-a5c0-ad72e8f6
IPADDR0=193.x.y.130
DNS1=193.x.y.254
PREFIX0=26
DEFROUTE=yes
IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL=yes
HWADDR=00:25:22:F9:71:3D
BOOTPROTO=none
IPV6_DEFROUTE=yes
GATEWAY0=193.x.y.129
IPV6_AUTOCONF=yes
IPV6_FAILURE_FATAL=no
IPV6_PEERROUTES=yes
TYPE=Ethernet
ONBOOT=yes
NAME=enp5s0
[root@physics sysconfig]# cat iptables
# Custom file edited on 15-May-2013
*filter
:INPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
:FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0]
:OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
-A INPUT -m conntrack --ctstate ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -p icmp -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -m conntrack --ctstate NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 22 -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -m conntrack --ctstate NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 25 -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -m conntrack --ctstate NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 80 -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -m conntrack --ctstate NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 110 -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -m conntrack --ctstate NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 143 -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -m conntrack --ctstate NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 443 -j ACCEPT
#-A INPUT -m conntrack --ctstate NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 465 -j ACCEPT
#-A INPUT -m conntrack --ctstate NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 587 -j ACCEPT
#-A INPUT -m conntrack --ctstate NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 993 -j ACCEPT
#-A INPUT -m conntrack --ctstate NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 995 -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -m conntrack --ctstate NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 2307 -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -p udp --dport 6277 -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -p udp --dport 24441 -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-host-prohibited
-A FORWARD -j ACCEPT
-A FORWARD -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-host-prohibited
COMMIT
# Completed on 2013-05-20 15:23
*nat
:PREROUTING ACCEPT [0:0]
:POSTROUTING ACCEPT [0:0]
:OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
-A POSTROUTING -s 172.16.0.0/16 -o p5p1 -j SNAT --to-source
193.231.40.130
COMMIT
[root@physics sysconfig]# route
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway GenmaskFlags Metric  Ref  Use Iface
default  g129.xxx.yyy0.0.0.0 UG0  00  p5p1
193.x.y.128  *   255.255.255.192 U 0  00  p5p1
172.16.0.0   *   255.255.0.0 U 0  00  p4p1
[root@physics sysconfig]# 

I need some addresses from local to be accessible from outside, so alias
interface is needed. Not any local device knows other than basic
routing. That is why I need another subnet, so alias.
Let's say 193.x.y.162 from (placed) local visible from outside. 
(I can do it with F18/Centos, etc.)
What is the desired/proposed way in F19?
Using network instead NM failed (no name resolution) in my testing. Do I
miss something? May I hope/wait for a fix in F19?
Why the interface name is p5p1 and p4p1, different from ifcfg-enp5s0
etc.? Is anywhere explained this?
In F18 docs there was a promise to have to choose between firewalld and
iptables, not implemented until now (can be manually done but it is not
trivial for anyone).

C. Sava




-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: F19 - How to use alias network interface? how to add static routes?

2013-05-21 Thread Cristian Sava
On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 09:21 +0300, Cristian Sava wrote:
 Hi all,
 I need to have alias network interfaces.
 What is the desired way to do this in F19?
 
 My actual setup (without alias):
 [root@physics sysconfig]# ls network-scripts/ifcfg-*
 network-scripts/ifcfg-enp4s0  network-scripts/ifcfg-enp5s0
 network-scripts/ifcfg-lo
 [root@physics sysconfig]# cat network-scripts/ifcfg-enp4s0
 TYPE=Ethernet
 #BOOTPROTO=dhcp
 BOOTPROTO=none
 DEFROUTE=yes
 IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL=no
 IPV6INIT=yes
 IPV6_AUTOCONF=yes
 IPV6_DEFROUTE=yes
 IPV6_PEERDNS=yes
 IPV6_PEERROUTES=yes
 IPV6_FAILURE_FATAL=no
 NAME=enp4s0
 UUID=4fd3476d-2423-4c26-99f9-28b5f6d18b05
 ONBOOT=yes
 HWADDR=00:08:54:41:46:01
 PEERDNS=yes
 PEERROUTES=yes
 IPADDR=172.16.0.1
 PREFIX=16
 [root@physics sysconfig]# cat network-scripts/ifcfg-enp5s0
 DOMAIN=central.ucv.ro
 IPV6_PEERDNS=yes
 IPV6INIT=yes
 UUID=df0a5629-9f3f-4c85-a5c0-ad72e8f6
 IPADDR0=193.x.y.130
 DNS1=193.x.y.254
 PREFIX0=26
 DEFROUTE=yes
 IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL=yes
 HWADDR=00:25:22:F9:71:3D
 BOOTPROTO=none
 IPV6_DEFROUTE=yes
 GATEWAY0=193.x.y.129
 IPV6_AUTOCONF=yes
 IPV6_FAILURE_FATAL=no
 IPV6_PEERROUTES=yes
 TYPE=Ethernet
 ONBOOT=yes
 NAME=enp5s0
 [root@physics sysconfig]# cat iptables
 # Custom file edited on 15-May-2013
 *filter
 :INPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
 :FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0]
 :OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
 -A INPUT -m conntrack --ctstate ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
 -A INPUT -p icmp -j ACCEPT
 -A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT
 -A INPUT -m conntrack --ctstate NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 22 -j ACCEPT
 -A INPUT -m conntrack --ctstate NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 25 -j ACCEPT
 -A INPUT -m conntrack --ctstate NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 80 -j ACCEPT
 -A INPUT -m conntrack --ctstate NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 110 -j ACCEPT
 -A INPUT -m conntrack --ctstate NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 143 -j ACCEPT
 -A INPUT -m conntrack --ctstate NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 443 -j ACCEPT
 #-A INPUT -m conntrack --ctstate NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 465 -j ACCEPT
 #-A INPUT -m conntrack --ctstate NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 587 -j ACCEPT
 #-A INPUT -m conntrack --ctstate NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 993 -j ACCEPT
 #-A INPUT -m conntrack --ctstate NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 995 -j ACCEPT
 -A INPUT -m conntrack --ctstate NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 2307 -j ACCEPT
 -A INPUT -p udp --dport 6277 -j ACCEPT
 -A INPUT -p udp --dport 24441 -j ACCEPT
 -A INPUT -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-host-prohibited
 -A FORWARD -j ACCEPT
 -A FORWARD -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-host-prohibited
 COMMIT
 # Completed on 2013-05-20 15:23
 *nat
 :PREROUTING ACCEPT [0:0]
 :POSTROUTING ACCEPT [0:0]
 :OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
 -A POSTROUTING -s 172.16.0.0/16 -o p5p1 -j SNAT --to-source
 193.231.40.130
 COMMIT
 [root@physics sysconfig]# route
 Kernel IP routing table
 Destination Gateway GenmaskFlags Metric  Ref  Use Iface
 default  g129.xxx.yyy0.0.0.0 UG0  00  p5p1
 193.x.y.128  *   255.255.255.192 U 0  00  p5p1
 172.16.0.0   *   255.255.0.0 U 0  00  p4p1
 [root@physics sysconfig]# 
 
 I need some addresses from local to be accessible from outside, so alias
 interface is needed. Not any local device knows other than basic
 routing. That is why I need another subnet, so alias.
 Let's say 193.x.y.162 from (placed) local visible from outside. 
 (I can do it with F18/Centos, etc.)
 What is the desired/proposed way in F19?
 Using network instead NM failed (no name resolution) in my testing. Do I
 miss something? May I hope/wait for a fix in F19?
 Why the interface name is p5p1 and p4p1, different from ifcfg-enp5s0
 etc.? Is anywhere explained this?
 In F18 docs there was a promise to have to choose between firewalld and
 iptables, not implemented until now (can be manually done but it is not
 trivial for anyone).
 
 C. Sava

Using this working setup, without graphical environment:
How do I add routes (without alias)? 

[root@physics network-scripts]# cat route-enp4s0
193.x.y.142/32 dev p4p1
193.x.y.143/32 dev p4p1

It is not working , nor renaming to route-p4p1
I want these addresses just behind p4p1 interface, no gateway between.
Equivalent to:

route add -host 193.x.y.142 dev p4p1

that is working ok on F19.
Back to rc.local?
What if I want bridging (but do not expect me to setup a kvm-qemu
virtual machine with F18/Centos to workaround this alias problem)?
Is this how F19-beta will be?

C. Sava

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

rawhide report: 20130521 changes

2013-05-21 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
Compose started at Tue May 21 08:15:02 UTC 2013

Broken deps for x86_64
--
[airinv]
airinv-1.00.0-3.fc19.i686 requires libsoci_mysql.so.3.1
airinv-1.00.0-3.fc19.i686 requires libsoci_core.so.3.1
airinv-1.00.0-3.fc19.x86_64 requires libsoci_mysql.so.3.1()(64bit)
airinv-1.00.0-3.fc19.x86_64 requires libsoci_core.so.3.1()(64bit)
[airrac]
airrac-1.00.0-3.fc19.i686 requires libsoci_mysql.so.3.1
airrac-1.00.0-3.fc19.i686 requires libsoci_core.so.3.1
airrac-1.00.0-3.fc19.x86_64 requires libsoci_mysql.so.3.1()(64bit)
airrac-1.00.0-3.fc19.x86_64 requires libsoci_core.so.3.1()(64bit)
[airsched]
airsched-1.00.0-3.fc19.i686 requires libsoci_mysql.so.3.1
airsched-1.00.0-3.fc19.i686 requires libsoci_core.so.3.1
airsched-1.00.0-3.fc19.x86_64 requires libsoci_mysql.so.3.1()(64bit)
airsched-1.00.0-3.fc19.x86_64 requires libsoci_core.so.3.1()(64bit)
[claws-mail-plugins]
claws-mail-plugins-geolocation-3.9.0-7.fc20.x86_64 requires 
claws-mail(plugin-api)(x86-64) = 0:3.9.0.122
[dragonegg]
dragonegg-3.1-19.fc19.x86_64 requires gcc = 0:4.7.2-9.fc19
[ekiga]
ekiga-4.0.1-1.fc19.x86_64 requires libedata-book-1.2.so.17()(64bit)
[gdl]
gdl-0.9.3-6.cvs20130321.fc20.x86_64 requires libhdf5.so.7()(64bit)
gdl-0.9.3-6.cvs20130321.fc20.x86_64 requires hdf5 = 0:1.8.10
gdl-python-0.9.3-6.cvs20130321.fc20.x86_64 requires 
libhdf5.so.7()(64bit)
[gooddata-cl]
gooddata-cl-1.2.56-2.fc19.noarch requires gdata-java
[kawa]
1:kawa-1.11-5.fc19.x86_64 requires servlet25
[lancet]
lancet-1.0.1-6.fc19.noarch requires ant-nodeps = 0:1.7.1
[lua-logging]
lua-logging-1.3.0-1.fc20.noarch requires lua = 0:5.2
[lua-rex]
lua-rex-2.7.2-1.fc20.x86_64 requires lua = 0:5.2
[luadoc]
luadoc-3.0.1-8.fc20.noarch requires lua = 0:5.2
[lutok]
lutok-devel-0.2-4.fc19.i686 requires lua-devel  0:5.2
lutok-devel-0.2-4.fc19.x86_64 requires lua-devel  0:5.2
[mapserver]
php-mapserver-6.0.3-9.fc19.x86_64 requires php(zend-abi) = 
0:20100525-x86-64
php-mapserver-6.0.3-9.fc19.x86_64 requires php(api) = 0:20100412-x86-64
[ooo2gd]
ooo2gd-3.0.0-6.fc19.x86_64 requires gdata-java
[openbox]
gdm-control-3.5.0-11.20121001git782b28.fc19.x86_64 requires gnome-panel
gnome-panel-control-3.5.0-11.20121001git782b28.fc19.x86_64 requires 
gnome-panel
[ovirt-engine]
ovirt-engine-notification-service-3.1.0-1.fc19.noarch requires 
classpathx-mail
[perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene]
perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-17.fc19.noarch requires 
perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq)
[perl-Bio-SamTools]
perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.x86_64 requires 
perl(Bio::SeqFeature::Lite)
perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.x86_64 requires perl(Bio::PrimarySeq)
[python-TraitsBackendQt]
python-TraitsBackendQt-3.5.0-5.fc19.noarch requires python-TraitsGUI
[python-docs]
python-docs-2.7.4-1.fc20.noarch requires python = 0:2.7.4
[python-flask-admin]
python-flask-admin-1.0.5-3.fc20.noarch requires python-wtf-peewee
[qpid-cpp]
qpid-cpp-server-xml-0.20-6.fc20.x86_64 requires libxqilla.so.5()(64bit)
[rmol]
rmol-1.00.0-2.fc19.i686 requires libsoci_mysql.so.3.1
rmol-1.00.0-2.fc19.i686 requires libsoci_core.so.3.1
rmol-1.00.0-2.fc19.x86_64 requires libsoci_mysql.so.3.1()(64bit)
rmol-1.00.0-2.fc19.x86_64 requires libsoci_core.so.3.1()(64bit)
[scala]
scala-2.9.2-2.fc19.noarch requires osgi(org.scala-ide.scala.library)
[sevmgr]
sevmgr-1.00.0-4.fc19.i686 requires libsoci_mysql.so.3.1
sevmgr-1.00.0-4.fc19.i686 requires libsoci_core.so.3.1
sevmgr-1.00.0-4.fc19.x86_64 requires libsoci_mysql.so.3.1()(64bit)
sevmgr-1.00.0-4.fc19.x86_64 requires libsoci_core.so.3.1()(64bit)
[simcrs]
simcrs-1.00.0-2.fc19.i686 requires libsoci_mysql.so.3.1
simcrs-1.00.0-2.fc19.i686 requires libsoci_core.so.3.1
simcrs-1.00.0-2.fc19.x86_64 requires libsoci_mysql.so.3.1()(64bit)
simcrs-1.00.0-2.fc19.x86_64 requires libsoci_core.so.3.1()(64bit)
[simfqt]
simfqt-1.00.0-2.fc19.i686 requires libsoci_mysql.so.3.1
simfqt-1.00.0-2.fc19.i686 requires libsoci_core.so.3.1
simfqt-1.00.0-2.fc19.x86_64 requires libsoci_mysql.so.3.1()(64bit)
simfqt-1.00.0-2.fc19.x86_64 requires libsoci_core.so.3.1()(64bit)
[spacewalk-web]
spacewalk-dobby-1.9.22-2.fc19.noarch requires perl(Spacewalk::Setup)
[stdair]
stdair-1.00.1-3.fc19.i686 requires libsoci_mysql.so.3.1
stdair-1.00.1-3.fc19.i686 requires libsoci_core.so.3.1
stdair-1.00.1-3.fc19.x86_64 requires libsoci_mysql.so.3.1()(64bit)
stdair-1.00.1-3.fc19.x86_64 requires libsoci_core.so.3.1()(64bit)
[syncevolution]
1:syncevolution-libs-1.3.99.3-1.fc20.i686 requires 
libedata-book-1.2.so.17

F-19 Branched report: 20130521 changes

2013-05-21 Thread Fedora Branched Report
Compose started at Tue May 21 09:15:02 UTC 2013

Broken deps for x86_64
--
[byzanz]
byzanz-0.3-0.5.fc17.x86_64 requires libpanel-applet-4.so.0()(64bit)
[deltacloud-core]
deltacloud-core-rhevm-1.1.3-1.fc19.noarch requires rubygem(rbovirt) = 
0:0.0.18
[dragonegg]
dragonegg-3.1-19.fc19.x86_64 requires gcc = 0:4.7.2-9.fc19
[fence-virt]
fence-virtd-libvirt-qmf-0.3.0-11.fc19.x86_64 requires libvirt-qmf
[freeipa]
freeipa-server-strict-3.2.0-0.3.beta1.fc19.x86_64 requires pki-ca = 
0:10.0.1
freeipa-server-strict-3.2.0-0.3.beta1.fc19.x86_64 requires krb5-server 
= 0:1.11.2-1
freeipa-server-strict-3.2.0-0.3.beta1.fc19.x86_64 requires 389-ds-base 
= 0:1.3.0.5
[glusterfs]
glusterfs-ufo-3.4.0-0.4.beta1.fc19.noarch requires 
openstack-swift-proxy = 0:1.8.0
glusterfs-ufo-3.4.0-0.4.beta1.fc19.noarch requires 
openstack-swift-object = 0:1.8.0
glusterfs-ufo-3.4.0-0.4.beta1.fc19.noarch requires 
openstack-swift-container = 0:1.8.0
glusterfs-ufo-3.4.0-0.4.beta1.fc19.noarch requires 
openstack-swift-account = 0:1.8.0
glusterfs-ufo-3.4.0-0.4.beta1.fc19.noarch requires openstack-swift = 
0:1.8.0
[gooddata-cl]
gooddata-cl-1.2.56-2.fc19.noarch requires gdata-java
[kawa]
1:kawa-1.11-5.fc19.x86_64 requires servlet25
[libkolab]
php-kolab-0.4.1-3.fc19.x86_64 requires php(zend-abi) = 0:20100525-x86-64
php-kolab-0.4.1-3.fc19.x86_64 requires php(api) = 0:20100412-x86-64
[ooo2gd]
ooo2gd-3.0.0-6.fc19.x86_64 requires gdata-java
[openbox]
gdm-control-3.5.0-11.20121001git782b28.fc19.x86_64 requires gnome-panel
gnome-panel-control-3.5.0-11.20121001git782b28.fc19.x86_64 requires 
gnome-panel
[ovirt-engine]
ovirt-engine-notification-service-3.1.0-1.fc19.noarch requires 
classpathx-mail
[perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene]
perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-17.fc19.noarch requires 
perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq)
[perl-Bio-SamTools]
perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.x86_64 requires 
perl(Bio::SeqFeature::Lite)
perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.x86_64 requires perl(Bio::PrimarySeq)
[python-AppTools]
python-AppTools-3.4.0-5.fc19.noarch requires python-TraitsGUI
[python-TraitsBackendQt]
python-TraitsBackendQt-3.5.0-5.fc19.noarch requires python-TraitsGUI
[scala]
scala-2.9.2-2.fc19.noarch requires osgi(org.scala-ide.scala.library)
[spacewalk-web]
spacewalk-dobby-1.9.22-2.fc19.noarch requires perl(Spacewalk::Setup)
[tntnet]
tntnet-2.1-15.fc19.i686 requires libcxxtools.so.8
tntnet-2.1-15.fc19.x86_64 requires libcxxtools.so.8()(64bit)
[zarafa]
php-mapi-7.0.13-1.fc19.x86_64 requires php(zend-abi) = 0:20100525-x86-64
php-mapi-7.0.13-1.fc19.x86_64 requires php(api) = 0:20100412-x86-64



Broken deps for i386
--
[byzanz]
byzanz-0.3-0.5.fc17.i686 requires libpanel-applet-4.so.0
[deltacloud-core]
deltacloud-core-rhevm-1.1.3-1.fc19.noarch requires rubygem(rbovirt) = 
0:0.0.18
[dragonegg]
dragonegg-3.1-19.fc19.i686 requires gcc = 0:4.7.2-9.fc19
[fence-virt]
fence-virtd-libvirt-qmf-0.3.0-11.fc19.i686 requires libvirt-qmf
[freeipa]
freeipa-server-strict-3.2.0-0.3.beta1.fc19.i686 requires pki-ca = 
0:10.0.1
freeipa-server-strict-3.2.0-0.3.beta1.fc19.i686 requires krb5-server = 
0:1.11.2-1
freeipa-server-strict-3.2.0-0.3.beta1.fc19.i686 requires 389-ds-base = 
0:1.3.0.5
[glusterfs]
glusterfs-ufo-3.4.0-0.4.beta1.fc19.noarch requires 
openstack-swift-proxy = 0:1.8.0
glusterfs-ufo-3.4.0-0.4.beta1.fc19.noarch requires 
openstack-swift-object = 0:1.8.0
glusterfs-ufo-3.4.0-0.4.beta1.fc19.noarch requires 
openstack-swift-container = 0:1.8.0
glusterfs-ufo-3.4.0-0.4.beta1.fc19.noarch requires 
openstack-swift-account = 0:1.8.0
glusterfs-ufo-3.4.0-0.4.beta1.fc19.noarch requires openstack-swift = 
0:1.8.0
[gooddata-cl]
gooddata-cl-1.2.56-2.fc19.noarch requires gdata-java
[kawa]
1:kawa-1.11-5.fc19.i686 requires servlet25
[libkolab]
php-kolab-0.4.1-3.fc19.i686 requires php(zend-abi) = 0:20100525-x86-32
php-kolab-0.4.1-3.fc19.i686 requires php(api) = 0:20100412-x86-32
[ooo2gd]
ooo2gd-3.0.0-6.fc19.i686 requires gdata-java
[openbox]
gdm-control-3.5.0-11.20121001git782b28.fc19.i686 requires gnome-panel
gnome-panel-control-3.5.0-11.20121001git782b28.fc19.i686 requires 
gnome-panel
[ovirt-engine]
ovirt-engine-notification-service-3.1.0-1.fc19.noarch requires 
classpathx-mail
[perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene]
perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-17.fc19.noarch requires 
perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq)
[perl-Bio-SamTools]
perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.i686 requires perl(Bio::SeqFeature::Lite)
perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.i686 requires perl(Bio::PrimarySeq)
[python-AppTools]

Re: [Fedora QA] #354: Proposed Test Day - Thermostat

2013-05-21 Thread Fedora QA
#354: Proposed Test Day - Thermostat
---+---
  Reporter:  jerboaa   |  Owner:
  Type:  task  | Status:  new
  Priority:  major |  Milestone:  Fedora 19
 Component:  Test Day  |Version:
Resolution:|   Keywords:
Blocked By:|   Blocking:
---+---

Comment (by jerboaa):

 Replying to [comment:5 martix]:
  This Test Day is scheduled on this Thursday. What's your status? Do you
 need any advise or you can prepare this before Thursday? Tell me or adamw
 if you need to move this Test Day to another date.

 Everything should be ready by Thursday morning, CET.

-- 
Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/354#comment:6
Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa
Fedora Quality Assurance
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Good Work

2013-05-21 Thread Lawrence Graves

I just wanted the Fedora team to be aware that I am running Fedora 19
and all of its features using BTRFS and so far am not experiencing any
problems. There were problems with wireless connects on 5ghz but this
morning that has been fixed. Thanks for all the hard work you all are
doing to bring the best OS (I think):-) out there. I believe Fedora is
destined for early release if what has been produced so far is a sign.

--
All things are workable but don't all things work. Prov. 3:5  6
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Weird pointer behavior in F19

2013-05-21 Thread Michael Knepher
I've been running F19 on my laptop since pre-Alpha, and I've got it
fully up-to-date. Starting yesterday I started noticing strange issues
with the pointer on some applications - mainly epiphany, gedit and
evolution - and was wondering if anyone else is seeing similar issues.

* The first thing I noticed yesterday was in epiphany. In a given tab,
the pointer would get stuck in a certain context (i.e., would remain
as the hand or cursor bar after mousing over a link or text), as long as
that tab was in focus (including the scrollbar). Other tabs or windows
would not exhibit this problem, but the problem would persist when
switching back to the problematic tab. Refreshing the page seems to make
the problem go away for a time. 

* Scrollbar behavior - another intermittent issue has been a problem
interacting with the scrollbar using the mouse. When dragging a
scrollbar with the pointer, the scrollbar will stay put and the viewport
will not change until the mouse button is released. Sometimes this is
accompanied by an inability to scroll the viewport with the scrollwheel.
I've had this issue in all three of the above-named apps, but it seems
to come and go with no predictable pattern. 

* Inability to select text by click-dragging - in windows/text views(?
not sure of the technical terms here) in which the scrollbar issue is
present, it is impossible to select text by clicking and dragging with
the mouse. I can click-and-release in a spot to set the cursor, then
shift-click at another point to select a block of text, or double- and
triple-click to select words and lines, but not simply drag.

* Disappearing pointer in gedit - this morning I also noticed that while
working in gedit, the pointer will disappear when I start typing in a
document. The pointer will remain invisible while within the document
pane, it will only show up when moving outside the editing pane. Saving
the document or switching to another tab and back to the original tab
will cause the pointer to reappear within the editing pane. While the
pointer is missing, I have the same issues with scrolling and selecting
described above.

Is anyone else seeing similar issues? I'm running an Acer Aspire 5553G
laptop, with a USB mouse and keyboard attached.

Michael Knepher



-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Weird pointer behavior in F19

2013-05-21 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 11:53 -0700, Michael Knepher wrote:
 I've been running F19 on my laptop since pre-Alpha, and I've got it
 fully up-to-date. Starting yesterday I started noticing strange issues
 with the pointer on some applications - mainly epiphany, gedit and
 evolution - and was wondering if anyone else is seeing similar issues.
 
 * The first thing I noticed yesterday was in epiphany. In a given tab,
 the pointer would get stuck in a certain context (i.e., would remain
 as the hand or cursor bar after mousing over a link or text), as long as
 that tab was in focus (including the scrollbar). Other tabs or windows
 would not exhibit this problem, but the problem would persist when
 switching back to the problematic tab. Refreshing the page seems to make
 the problem go away for a time. 
 
 * Scrollbar behavior - another intermittent issue has been a problem
 interacting with the scrollbar using the mouse. When dragging a
 scrollbar with the pointer, the scrollbar will stay put and the viewport
 will not change until the mouse button is released. Sometimes this is
 accompanied by an inability to scroll the viewport with the scrollwheel.
 I've had this issue in all three of the above-named apps, but it seems
 to come and go with no predictable pattern. 
 
 * Inability to select text by click-dragging - in windows/text views(?
 not sure of the technical terms here) in which the scrollbar issue is
 present, it is impossible to select text by clicking and dragging with
 the mouse. I can click-and-release in a spot to set the cursor, then
 shift-click at another point to select a block of text, or double- and
 triple-click to select words and lines, but not simply drag.
 
 * Disappearing pointer in gedit - this morning I also noticed that while
 working in gedit, the pointer will disappear when I start typing in a
 document. The pointer will remain invisible while within the document
 pane, it will only show up when moving outside the editing pane. Saving
 the document or switching to another tab and back to the original tab
 will cause the pointer to reappear within the editing pane. While the
 pointer is missing, I have the same issues with scrolling and selecting
 described above.
 
 Is anyone else seeing similar issues? I'm running an Acer Aspire 5553G
 laptop, with a USB mouse and keyboard attached.
 
 Michael Knepher


Try 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-8741/libXi-1.7.1-3.fc19
and give karma if it fixes the issue for you.

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Password strength checker not for root account

2013-05-21 Thread Mateusz Marzantowicz
Is it a bug or intentional design? In Anaconda, when you create root
password it is not checked for complexity but password for regular user
account is.

This is F19 Beta RC2 netinstall.


Mateusz Marzantowicz
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Password strength checker not for root account

2013-05-21 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 21:35 +0200, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
 Is it a bug or intentional design? In Anaconda, when you create root
 password it is not checked for complexity but password for regular user
 account is.

Um, I'm pretty sure it is checked. It may not follow precisely the same
rules as other checks, I guess, but I get a warning when I use '11'
that it's a palindrome.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Password strength checker not for root account

2013-05-21 Thread Mateusz Marzantowicz
On 21.05.2013 21:36, Adam Williamson wrote:
 On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 21:35 +0200, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
 Is it a bug or intentional design? In Anaconda, when you create root
 password it is not checked for complexity but password for regular user
 account is.
 Um, I'm pretty sure it is checked. It may not follow precisely the same
 rules as other checks, I guess, but I get a warning when I use '11'
 that it's a palindrome.

OK, I see it now, but for regular user there is this progress bar like
indicator which tells you how strong is your password. For root I only
get textual warning.


Mateusz Marzantowicz
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Password strength checker not for root account

2013-05-21 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 21:41 +0200, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
 On 21.05.2013 21:36, Adam Williamson wrote:
  On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 21:35 +0200, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
  Is it a bug or intentional design? In Anaconda, when you create root
  password it is not checked for complexity but password for regular user
  account is.
  Um, I'm pretty sure it is checked. It may not follow precisely the same
  rules as other checks, I guess, but I get a warning when I use '11'
  that it's a palindrome.
 
 OK, I see it now, but for regular user there is this progress bar like
 indicator which tells you how strong is your password. For root I only
 get textual warning.

Ah, I see what you mean. Yeah, it seems reasonable to add that for root,
since as you say, it shows up for the user spoke (and you also get the
strength meter for the encryption passphrase, if you select encryption).
File a bug?
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Password strength checker not for root account

2013-05-21 Thread Mateusz Marzantowicz
On 21.05.2013 21:43, Adam Williamson wrote:
 On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 21:41 +0200, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
 On 21.05.2013 21:36, Adam Williamson wrote:
 On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 21:35 +0200, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
 Is it a bug or intentional design? In Anaconda, when you create root
 password it is not checked for complexity but password for regular user
 account is.
 Um, I'm pretty sure it is checked. It may not follow precisely the same
 rules as other checks, I guess, but I get a warning when I use '11'
 that it's a palindrome.
 OK, I see it now, but for regular user there is this progress bar like
 indicator which tells you how strong is your password. For root I only
 get textual warning.
 Ah, I see what you mean. Yeah, it seems reasonable to add that for root,
 since as you say, it shows up for the user spoke (and you also get the
 strength meter for the encryption passphrase, if you select encryption).
 File a bug?

Here it is, please check it's filed correctly:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=965832


Mateusz Marzantowicz
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

F19 Beta RC2: First log in - GNOME Welcome goes full screen

2013-05-21 Thread Mateusz Marzantowicz
Is it possible to disable this feature? It might be funny when you are
10 years old, new Linux user and just gotten your first computer from
your parents. For all other cases it's ... ridiculous? After 10 new
accounts I'll have to contact psychotherapist. Besides, it scared me
because I had to wait about 5 secs. before video loaded and was
uncertain if my freshly installed box hanged with White Screen of
Death). What is most important - it is wasting users time.


Mateusz Marzantowicz
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: F19 Beta RC2: First log in - GNOME Welcome goes full screen

2013-05-21 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 22:54 +0200, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
 Is it possible to disable this feature? It might be funny when you are
 10 years old, new Linux user and just gotten your first computer from
 your parents. For all other cases it's ... ridiculous?

...except that I frequently still run into people who think you have to
use the mouse to access the overview.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: F19 Beta RC2: First log in - GNOME Welcome goes full screen

2013-05-21 Thread Mateusz Marzantowicz
On 21.05.2013 23:13, Adam Williamson wrote:
 On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 22:54 +0200, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
 Is it possible to disable this feature? It might be funny when you are
 10 years old, new Linux user and just gotten your first computer from
 your parents. For all other cases it's ... ridiculous?
 ...except that I frequently still run into people who think you have to
 use the mouse to access the overview.

Yes, I know that there are different levels of user experience and not
all people find GNOME intuitive. On the other hand showing full screen
movie every time user logs in using new account is a bit strange way of
educating people.

Many users do more than one Fedora install and create more than one user
account. Do they really have to watch this video every time? What about
people that use Linux for more than 10 or 20 years?


Mateusz Marzantowicz
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: F19 Beta RC2: First log in - GNOME Welcome goes full screen

2013-05-21 Thread Mateusz Marzantowicz
On 21.05.2013 23:28, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
 On 21.05.2013 23:13, Adam Williamson wrote:
 On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 22:54 +0200, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
 Is it possible to disable this feature? It might be funny when you are
 10 years old, new Linux user and just gotten your first computer from
 your parents. For all other cases it's ... ridiculous?
 ...except that I frequently still run into people who think you have to
 use the mouse to access the overview.
 Yes, I know that there are different levels of user experience and not
 all people find GNOME intuitive. On the other hand showing full screen
 movie every time user logs in using new account is a bit strange way of
 educating people.


Maybe showing status bar notification will be sufficient?


Mateusz Marzantowicz
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: F19 Beta RC2: First log in - GNOME Welcome goes full screen

2013-05-21 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 23:28 +0200, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
 On 21.05.2013 23:13, Adam Williamson wrote:
  On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 22:54 +0200, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
  Is it possible to disable this feature? It might be funny when you are
  10 years old, new Linux user and just gotten your first computer from
  your parents. For all other cases it's ... ridiculous?
  ...except that I frequently still run into people who think you have to
  use the mouse to access the overview.
 
 Yes, I know that there are different levels of user experience and not
 all people find GNOME intuitive. On the other hand showing full screen
 movie every time user logs in using new account is a bit strange way of
 educating people.
 
 Many users do more than one Fedora install and create more than one user
 account. Do they really have to watch this video every time? What about
 people that use Linux for more than 10 or 20 years?

You can kill it with alt-f4.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: F19 Beta RC2: First log in - GNOME Welcome goes full screen

2013-05-21 Thread Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R

Install Xfce instead and you won't have to watch it.

--
 Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX   c...@omen.com   www.omen.com
Developer of Industrial ZMODEM(Tm) for Embedded Applications
  Omen Technology Inc  The High Reliability Software
10255 NW Old Cornelius Pass Portland OR 97231   503-614-0430

--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: F19 Beta RC2: First log in - GNOME Welcome goes full screen

2013-05-21 Thread Ed Greshko
On 05/22/13 05:30, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
 On 21.05.2013 23:28, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
 On 21.05.2013 23:13, Adam Williamson wrote:
 On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 22:54 +0200, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
 Is it possible to disable this feature? It might be funny when you are
 10 years old, new Linux user and just gotten your first computer from
 your parents. For all other cases it's ... ridiculous?
 ...except that I frequently still run into people who think you have to
 use the mouse to access the overview.
 Yes, I know that there are different levels of user experience and not
 all people find GNOME intuitive. On the other hand showing full screen
 movie every time user logs in using new account is a bit strange way of
 educating people.

 Maybe showing status bar notification will be sufficient?

Maybe the question to answer is, What triggers the GNOME New User Welcome 
Screen?.  Then, if this one time event causes difficulty, write a small 
post-user-create script to remove the trigger.

-- 
The only thing worse than a poorly asked question is a cryptic answer.
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: F19 Beta RC2: First log in - GNOME Welcome goes full screen

2013-05-21 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2013-05-22 at 06:29 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:

 Maybe the question to answer is, What triggers the GNOME New User
 Welcome Screen?.

First login to GNOME with any user account: each time you create an
account and log in to GNOME with it, you'll see the video. Subsequent
logins with the same account won't show it.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: F19 Beta RC2: First log in - GNOME Welcome goes full screen

2013-05-21 Thread ajsfedora

On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 22:54 +0200, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
 Is it possible to disable this feature? It might be funny when you are
 10 years old, new Linux user and just gotten your first computer from
 your parents. For all other cases it's ... ridiculous? After 10 new
 accounts I'll have to contact psychotherapist. Besides, it scared me
 because I had to wait about 5 secs. before video loaded and was
 uncertain if my freshly installed box hanged with White Screen of
 Death). What is most important - it is wasting users time.
 
 
 Mateusz Marzantowicz


1) mkdir /etc/skel/.config
2) echo yes  /etc/skel/.config/gnome-initial-setup-done

Tony


-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: F19 Beta RC2: First log in - GNOME Welcome goes full screen

2013-05-21 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 22:54 +0200, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
 Is it possible to disable this feature? It might be funny when you are
 10 years old, new Linux user and just gotten your first computer from
 your parents. For all other cases it's ... ridiculous? After 10 new
 accounts I'll have to contact psychotherapist. Besides, it scared me
 because I had to wait about 5 secs. before video loaded and was
 uncertain if my freshly installed box hanged with White Screen of
 Death). What is most important - it is wasting users time.

Are you in the account creation business ?

In any case, as others have pointed out, gnome-initial-setup won't run
if the file ~/.config/gnome-initial-setup-done exists. the welcome video
will only play if the file ~/.config/run-welcome-tour exists. 

All of this can easily be found out by looking at the
gnome-initial-setup package - which is a leaf package and can be removed
without any harm to your system.


Matthias

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: F19 Beta RC2: First log in - GNOME Welcome goes full screen

2013-05-21 Thread Ed Greshko
On 05/22/13 06:31, Adam Williamson wrote:
 On Wed, 2013-05-22 at 06:29 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:

 Maybe the question to answer is, What triggers the GNOME New User
 Welcome Screen?.
 First login to GNOME with any user account: each time you create an
 account and log in to GNOME with it, you'll see the video. Subsequent
 logins with the same account won't show it.

Right  But what is being checked to determine it is a first login?  Is is 
something simple such as the existence of a directory?  Just wondering if it 
can be tricked into thinking this is the second time the login has occurred.

Maybe a script to create the GNOME user directory framework with default 
settings?

FWIW, I think doing all this is more trouble than it is worth...I'm just bored 
today.  :-)

-- 
The only thing worse than a poorly asked question is a cryptic answer.
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Weird pointer behavior in F19

2013-05-21 Thread Michael Knepher
On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 15:07 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
 Try 
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-8741/libXi-1.7.1-3.fc19
 and give karma if it fixes the issue for you.
 

Thanks for the pointer. So far, so good.

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: F19 Beta RC2: First log in - GNOME Welcome goes full screen

2013-05-21 Thread Ed Greshko
On 05/22/13 06:31, Adam Williamson wrote:
 First login to GNOME with any user account: each time you create an
 account and log in to GNOME with it, you'll see the video. Subsequent
 logins with the same account won't show it.

I see Tony (a.k.a. ajsfedora) has just provided the magic.

-- 
The only thing worse than a poorly asked question is a cryptic answer.
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Fedora 18 updates-testing report

2013-05-21 Thread updates
The following Fedora 18 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
 133  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-0416/fedora-business-cards-1-0.1.beta1.fc18
  66  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-3935/puppet-3.1.1-1.fc18
  60  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-4243/stunnel-4.55-1.fc18
  52  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-4589/tomcat6-6.0.36-2.fc18
  47  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-4823/microcode_ctl-2.0-3.fc18
  32  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-6117/eucalyptus-3.2.2-1.fc18
  20  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-7135/xmp-3.5.0-3.fc18
  18  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-7309/gpsd-3.9-1.fc18
   6  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-8182/nginx-1.2.9-1.fc18
   6  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-8193/python-virtualenv-1.9.1-1.fc18
   4  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-8385/owncloud-4.5.11-1.fc18
   4  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-8381/varnish-3.0.3-5.fc18
   4  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-8375/ruby-1.9.3.429-30.fc18
   2  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-8590/xen-4.2.2-5.fc18
   0  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-8794/spnavcfg-0.2.1-5.fc18
   0  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-8801/pmount-0.9.23-4.fc18
   0  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-8717/kdelibs3-3.5.10-53.fc18
   0  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-8703/FlightGear-2.8.0-2.fc18
   0  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-8694/python-backports-ssl_match_hostname-3.2-0.3.a3.fc18
   0  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-8681/libvirt-0.10.2.5-1.fc18
   0  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-8687/gypsy-0.9-1.fc18
   0  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-8702/moodle-2.3.7-1.fc18


The following Fedora 18 Critical Path updates have yet to be approved:
 Age URL
 219  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-16107/xorg-x11-drv-qxl-0.1.0-1.fc18
 101  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-2192/nautilus-3.6.3-5.fc18
  11  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-7791/network-manager-applet-0.9.8.1-3.git20130430.fc18
  11  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-7357/abrt-2.1.4-3.fc18,libreport-2.1.4-4.fc18
   8  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-8044/pcre-8.31-5.fc18
   8  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-8063/lxpanel-0.5.12-2.fc18
   6  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-8229/gvfs-1.14.2-4.fc18
   6  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-8232/createrepo-0.9.9-21.fc18
   6  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-8211/libcap-2.22-5.fc18
   6  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-8209/p11-kit-0.14-2.fc18
   5  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-8300/xkeyboard-config-2.6-8.fc18
   5  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-8297/wpa_supplicant-1.1-2.fc18
   5  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-8296/evolution-data-server-3.6.4-4.fc18
   5  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-8310/NetworkManager-0.9.8.1-3.git20130514.fc18,network-manager-applet-0.9.8.1-4.git20130514.fc18
   4  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-8399/libxml2-2.9.1-1.fc18.1
   2  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-8584/clutter-1.12.2-2.fc18
   0  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-8783/fedora-bookmarks-15-2.fc18
   0  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-8785/xfce4-settings-4.10.1-2.fc18
   0  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-8722/PackageKit-0.8.9-1.fc18,zif-0.3.6-1.fc18


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora 18 updates-testing

darkhttpd-1.9-1.fc18
fedora-bookmarks-15-2.fc18
flashrom-0.9.6.1-4.svn1673.fc18
freecode-submit-2.5-2.fc18
git-ftp-0.84-1.fc18
hovercraft-1.1-3.fc18
imapsync-1.542-1.fc18
lfcbase-1.5.4-2.fc18
lftp-4.4.6-1.fc18
libint2-2.0.3-2.641hg.fc18
mingw-gtkspell3-3.0.2-3.fc18
perl-Stream-Buffered-0.02-1.fc18
perl-Test-TCP-1.27-1.fc18
php-horde-Horde-Imap-Client-2.10.1-1.fc18
php-horde-Horde-Prefs-2.4.1-1.fc18
php-horde-Horde-Text-Filter-2.1.2-1.fc18
php-pecl-xhprof-0.9.3-1.fc18
pmount-0.9.23-4.fc18
scilab-5.4.1-4.fc18
spnavcfg-0.2.1-5.fc18
sugar-browse-149.3-1.fc18
sugar-imageviewer-55-1.fc18
sugar-locosugar-9-1.fc18
sugar-record-98-1.fc18
sugar-speak-46-1.fc18
systemtap-2.2.1-1.fc18
uucp-1.07-37.fc18
xfce4-dict-0.7.0-1.fc18
xfce4-settings-4.10.1-2.fc18

Details about builds:



 darkhttpd-1.9-1.fc18 (FEDORA-2013-8799)
 A secure, lightweight, fast, 

Fedora 17 updates-testing report

2013-05-21 Thread updates
The following Fedora 17 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
 320  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-10269/revelation-0.4.14-1.fc17
 132  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-0455/fedora-business-cards-1-0.1.beta1.fc17
  61  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-4174/glibc-2.15-59.fc17
  60  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-4234/stunnel-4.55-1.fc17
  59  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-4296/tomcat6-6.0.36-1.fc17
  55  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-4501/libxslt-1.1.28-1.fc17
  52  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-4581/libuser-0.57.6-2.fc17
  40  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-5349/389-ds-base-1.2.11.21-1.fc17
  33  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-5967/xorg-x11-server-1.12.4-7.fc17
  20  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-7144/xmp-3.4.0-11.fc17
  18  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-7305/gpsd-3.9-1.fc17
  11  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-7797/curl-7.24.0-9.fc17
   6  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-8219/krb5-1.10.2-12.fc17
   6  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-8221/python-virtualenv-1.9.1-1.fc17
   5  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-8284/thunderbird-17.0.6-1.fc17
   4  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-8411/ruby-1.9.3.429-30.fc17
   4  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-8377/varnish-3.0.3-5.fc17
   4  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-8398/xulrunner-21.0-3.fc17,firefox-21.0-3.fc17
   2  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-8571/xen-4.1.5-4.fc17
   0  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-8786/spnavcfg-0.2.1-5.fc17
   0  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-8789/pmount-0.9.23-4.fc17
   0  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-8689/kdelibs3-3.5.10-53.fc17
   0  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-8721/FlightGear-2.6.0-3.fc17
   0  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-8737/python-backports-ssl_match_hostname-3.2-0.3.a3.fc17
   0  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-8692/moodle-2.2.10-1.fc17
   0  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-8705/gypsy-0.9-1.fc17


The following Fedora 17 Critical Path updates have yet to be approved:
 Age URL
 272  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-12509/PackageKit-0.7.6-1.fc17
 101  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-2163/policycoreutils-2.1.13-27.3.fc17
  80  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-3304/libvpx-1.2.0-1.fc17
  11  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-7797/curl-7.24.0-9.fc17
   9  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-7689/soprano-2.9.2-1.fc17
   8  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-8056/pcre-8.21-7.fc17
   8  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-8052/ncurses-5.9-11.20130511.fc17
   8  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-8069/lxpanel-0.5.12-2.fc17
   6  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-8224/kernel-3.8.13-100.fc17
   5  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-8311/evolution-data-server-3.4.4-5.fc17
   5  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-8284/thunderbird-17.0.6-1.fc17
   2  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-8581/clutter-1.10.8-2.fc17
   0  
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-8807/fedora-bookmarks-15-2.fc17
   0  

[Test-Announce] 2013-05-22 @ 16:00 UTC - F19 Beta Blocker Bug Review #8

2013-05-21 Thread Tim Flink
# F19 Beta Blocker Review meeting #8
# Date: 2013-05-22
# Time: 16:00 UTC (12:00 EDT, 09:00 PDT)
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net

The eighth and hopefully final blocker review meeting for F19 beta will
be tomorrow. Come help us review blocker and FreezeException bugs!

We'll be running through the Beta blockers and freeze exception bugs.
The current list is available at:
http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current

We'll be reviewing the bugs to determine ...

1. Whether they meet the Beta release criteria [1] and should stay
  on the list
2. Whether they are getting the attention they need

[1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_19_Beta_Release_Criteria

For guidance on Blocker and FreezeException bugs, please refer to
  - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process
  - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_freeze_exception_bug_process

For the blocker review meeting protocol, see
  - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
test-announce mailing list
test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

[Test-Announce] Fedora 19 Beta Release Candidate 3 (RC3) Available Now!

2013-05-21 Thread Andre Robatino
NOTE: The 64-bit Live LXDE is over its size target (700 MiB) and will
not fit on a standard 700 MiB CD.

As per the Fedora 19 schedule [1], Fedora 19 Beta Release Candidate 3
(RC3) is now available for testing. Content information, including
changes, can be found at
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5602#comment:16 . Please see the
following pages for download links (including delta ISOs) and testing
instructions. Normally dl.fedoraproject.org should provide the fastest
download, but download-ib01.fedoraproject.org is available as a mirror
(with an approximately 1 hour lag) in case of trouble. To use it, just
replace dl with download-ib01 in the download URL.

Installation:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test

Base:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Base_Test

Desktop:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Desktop_Test

Ideally, all Alpha and Beta priority test cases for Installation [2],
Base [3], and Desktop [4] should pass in order to meet the Beta Release
Criteria [5]. Help is available on #fedora-qa on irc.freenode.net [6],
or on the test list [7].

Create Fedora 19 Beta test composes (TC) and release candidates (RC)
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5602

Current Blocker and Freeze Exception bugs:
http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current

[1] http://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-19/f-19-quality-tasks.html
[2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Installation_validation_testing
[3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Base_validation_testing
[4] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Desktop_validation_testing
[5] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_19_Beta_Release_Criteria
[6] irc://irc.freenode.net/fedora-qa
[7] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
test-announce mailing list
test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: On EFI: F18 is rendered unbootable after installing F19

2013-05-21 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2013-05-20 at 00:37 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
 The only time recently that installing Fedora  gronked an earlier version
 was when I deleted one too many LVM swap areas.
 
 
 The swap areas should be identified as to what installation they
 belong to.  Better yet, allow one to specify a single swap area partition.

You can do that in custom partitioning, I'm pretty sure...and missing a
swap partition shouldn't completely bork an install anyway, I don't
think...
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

[Test-Announce] 2013-05-22 @ 16:00 UTC - F19 Beta Blocker Bug Review #8

2013-05-21 Thread Tim Flink
# F19 Beta Blocker Review meeting #8
# Date: 2013-05-22
# Time: 16:00 UTC (12:00 EDT, 09:00 PDT)
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net

The eighth and hopefully final blocker review meeting for F19 beta will
be tomorrow. Come help us review blocker and FreezeException bugs!

We'll be running through the Beta blockers and freeze exception bugs.
The current list is available at:
http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current

We'll be reviewing the bugs to determine ...

1. Whether they meet the Beta release criteria [1] and should stay
  on the list
2. Whether they are getting the attention they need

[1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_19_Beta_Release_Criteria

For guidance on Blocker and FreezeException bugs, please refer to
  - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process
  - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_freeze_exception_bug_process

For the blocker review meeting protocol, see
  - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
test-announce mailing list
test-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce

[Test-Announce] Fedora 19 Beta Release Candidate 3 (RC3) Available Now!

2013-05-21 Thread Andre Robatino
NOTE: The 64-bit Live LXDE is over its size target (700 MiB) and will
not fit on a standard 700 MiB CD.

As per the Fedora 19 schedule [1], Fedora 19 Beta Release Candidate 3
(RC3) is now available for testing. Content information, including
changes, can be found at
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5602#comment:16 . Please see the
following pages for download links (including delta ISOs) and testing
instructions. Normally dl.fedoraproject.org should provide the fastest
download, but download-ib01.fedoraproject.org is available as a mirror
(with an approximately 1 hour lag) in case of trouble. To use it, just
replace dl with download-ib01 in the download URL.

Installation:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test

Base:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Base_Test

Desktop:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Desktop_Test

Ideally, all Alpha and Beta priority test cases for Installation [2],
Base [3], and Desktop [4] should pass in order to meet the Beta Release
Criteria [5]. Help is available on #fedora-qa on irc.freenode.net [6],
or on the test list [7].

Create Fedora 19 Beta test composes (TC) and release candidates (RC)
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5602

Current Blocker and Freeze Exception bugs:
http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current

[1] http://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-19/f-19-quality-tasks.html
[2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Installation_validation_testing
[3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Base_validation_testing
[4] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Desktop_validation_testing
[5] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_19_Beta_Release_Criteria
[6] irc://irc.freenode.net/fedora-qa
[7] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
test-announce mailing list
test-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce