Re: test matrix question, EFI vs x86_64
On Tue, 2013-10-08 at 14:41 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Oct 8, 2013, at 1:59 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > but in terms of the *general approach*, it is > > that the 'x86_64' column represents x86_64 BIOS, and UEFI represents > > x86_64 UEFI. > > OK good. Followup question: Is Mac EFI a suitable substitute for UEFI? > In a sense Mac EFI is more limited, so any failure there doesn't > necessarily mean broader failure with UEFI. Mac EFI is sortofa canary > in a mine. If it works, then UEFI should work. Well, there's always a slight element of subjectivity in filling out the matrix. If you have an extremely unusual bug that happens to affect your test configuration but would likely not affect anyone else's, you probably won't mark the box as 'fail' (perhaps 'warn'). I'd say that applies in this case: if the failure was one likely to affect other UEFI configs I'd mark it as 'fail', if it was exclusive to the config being tested, I'd say 'warn', it it works, 'pass'. If it's something that likely only affects EFI Macs, that's an...interesting question, but we do seem to mostly be on the 'block for Macs' side of the question at present, so probably 'fail'. Ultimately we can have multiple results for a matrix entry and the entries are only guidance for human evaluation anyway, so it's not too terribly important: the most important thing is that all potential blocker bugs are nominated as blockers. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin DOT net http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: First impression with f20-beta-tc2
On Oct 8, 2013, at 11:33 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote: > On 10/08/2013 07:35 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: >> On Oct 8, 2013, at 6:40 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote: >> >>> 64 bit netinstall with about 2700 packages successful on two machines. >> Are they UEFI? >> >>> Netinst UEFI boot cannot access hard drives. >> I don't know what that means. I just did an EFI netinstl and it saw and >> installed to my hard drive just fine. You need to provide more information. >> >> >> Chris Murphy > One machine does not have UEFI. The newer one has optional UEFI. > TC2 netinstall worked normally when booted without UEFI. Well that would sorta implicate your firmware that drives are missing in action in UEFI mode, and are visible in CSM-BIOS mode. Is the firmware at the most current version? What does "cannot access hard drives" mean exactly? Can you put /tmp/storage.log somewhere? Chris Murphy -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: First impression with f20-beta-tc2
On 10/08/2013 07:35 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: On Oct 8, 2013, at 6:40 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote: 64 bit netinstall with about 2700 packages successful on two machines. Are they UEFI? Netinst UEFI boot cannot access hard drives. I don't know what that means. I just did an EFI netinstl and it saw and installed to my hard drive just fine. You need to provide more information. Chris Murphy One machine does not have UEFI. The newer one has optional UEFI. TC2 netinstall worked normally when booted without UEFI. -- Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX c...@omen.com www.omen.com Developer of Industrial ZMODEM(Tm) for Embedded Applications Omen Technology Inc "The High Reliability Software" 10255 NW Old Cornelius Pass Portland OR 97231 503-614-0430 -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: First impression with f20-beta-tc2
On 10/08/2013 07:40 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote: Users and Groups does not work from Xfce, either from menu or program search. That's a known bug - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879922 Workaround is fairly simple. echo "StartupNotify=true" >> /usr/share/applications/system-config-users.desktop -- nonamedotc -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: First impression with f20-beta-tc2
On Oct 8, 2013, at 6:40 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote: > 64 bit netinstall with about 2700 packages successful on two machines. Are they UEFI? > Netinst UEFI boot cannot access hard drives. I don't know what that means. I just did an EFI netinstl and it saw and installed to my hard drive just fine. You need to provide more information. Chris Murphy -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
First impression with f20-beta-tc2
64 bit netinstall with about 2700 packages successful on two machines. Netinst UEFI boot cannot access hard drives. Users and Groups does not work from Xfce, either from menu or program search. -- Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX c...@omen.com www.omen.com Developer of Industrial ZMODEM(Tm) for Embedded Applications Omen Technology Inc "The High Reliability Software" 10255 NW Old Cornelius Pass Portland OR 97231 503-614-0430 -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: 2013-10-07 - Fedora QA Meeting - recap
On Tue, 8 Oct 2013 10:00:15 -0600 Tim Flink wrote: > On Mon, 07 Oct 2013 22:28:51 +0200 > Adam Williamson wrote: > > > * tflink and handsome_pirate to write up detailed proposals for > > projects to be worked on in a possible longer f21 schedule and > > post / link to them in the trac ticket > > I'm still futzing with some details but I'm almost done with the > taskbot proposal. I'm planning to add a link to FESCo's trac ticket > later today. > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Tflink/f21_delay_taskbot_development_proposal > > Tim I have added my proposal to the relevant FESCo ticket: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1178#comment:6 Tim signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: test matrix question, EFI vs x86_64
On Oct 8, 2013, at 1:59 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > but in terms of the *general approach*, it is > that the 'x86_64' column represents x86_64 BIOS, and UEFI represents > x86_64 UEFI. OK good. Followup question: Is Mac EFI a suitable substitute for UEFI? In a sense Mac EFI is more limited, so any failure there doesn't necessarily mean broader failure with UEFI. Mac EFI is sortofa canary in a mine. If it works, then UEFI should work. Chris Murphy -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: test matrix question, EFI vs x86_64
On Tue, 2013-10-08 at 13:43 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > If a test works for EFI, it seems like it also qualifies for x86_64. Maybe > the exception to this is for booting, where the x86_64 column indicates > x86_64+BIOS, and EFI indicates x86_64+EFI. Right? No, not really. Well. The intent is that the EFI column is greyed out where it is extremely unlikely EFI would ever behave differently, and white where it is possible that it may. I more or less pulled the list out of my ass, though. If you disagree with any of the calls I made in doing it, do suggest a modification, but in terms of the *general approach*, it is that the 'x86_64' column represents x86_64 BIOS, and UEFI represents x86_64 UEFI. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin DOT net http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
[Test-Announce] 2013-10-09 @ 16:00 UTC - F20 Beta Blocker Bug Review #3
# F20 Beta Blocker Review meeting #3 # Date: 2013-10-09 # Time: 16:00 UTC (12:00 EDT, 09:00 PDT) # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net Everyone's favorite weekly activity is almost upon us once again. We'll be holding another blocker review meeting tomorrow and while the list of bugs to review isn't huge, it still promises to be "lots o' fun"! We'll be running through the final blockers and freeze exception bugs. The current list is available at: http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current We'll be reviewing the bugs to determine ... 1. Whether they meet the beta release criteria [1] and should stay on the list 2. Whether they are getting the attention they need [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Beta_Release_Criteria For guidance on Blocker and FreezeException bugs, please refer to - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_freeze_exception_bug_process For the blocker review meeting protocol, see -https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ test-announce mailing list test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce-- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
test matrix question, EFI vs x86_64
If a test works for EFI, it seems like it also qualifies for x86_64. Maybe the exception to this is for booting, where the x86_64 column indicates x86_64+BIOS, and EFI indicates x86_64+EFI. Right? Chris Murphy -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: The bodhi nss bundle to rebase to nss-3.15.2 could use some karma
Elio Maldonado wrote: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-18382/nss-3.15.2-1.fc19,nss-util-3.15.2-1.fc19,nss-softokn-3.15.2-1.fc19,nspr-4.10.1-1.fc19 Thank you in advance, Thanks for sending out the email and fixing this problem. Karma left! Michael -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
The bodhi nss bundle to rebase to nss-3.15.2 could use some karma
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-18382/nss-3.15.2-1.fc19,nss-util-3.15.2-1.fc19,nss-softokn-3.15.2-1.fc19,nspr-4.10.1-1.fc19 Thank you in advance, Elio -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
First impression with f20-alpha-tc2
Dear testers, I still have the same problems with beta-tc2 as with beta-tc1: I installed f20-beta-tc2 (netinst.iso, with gnome as desktop) in VirtualBox! The installation is well performed, but no boot into gdm login (hangs in black screen). Workaround: Boot into runlevel 3, then say "init 5". The gdm login appears, and I can login!. Problem: I can't logout from the gnome3 session. Missing menu entry. gnome-session-quit helps. Additional problem: Choosing german keyboard as default during installation, but a tty login does not recognize my password after first booting (z/y problem for example). "loadkeys de" helps. The gdm login runs properly (no passwd problems, no y/z problem). Kind regards Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 19 (Schrödinger’s Cat) Kernel-3.11.3-201.fc19.x86_64 Joachim Backes https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: 2013-10-07 - Fedora QA Meeting - recap
On Mon, 07 Oct 2013 22:28:51 +0200 Adam Williamson wrote: > * tflink and handsome_pirate to write up detailed proposals for > projects to be worked on in a possible longer f21 schedule and post / > link to them in the trac ticket I'm still futzing with some details but I'm almost done with the taskbot proposal. I'm planning to add a link to FESCo's trac ticket later today. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Tflink/f21_delay_taskbot_development_proposal Tim signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
[Test-Announce] Fedora 20 Beta Test Compose 2 (TC2) Available Now!
NOTE: The 32- and 64-bit DVDs, the 64-bit Desktop Live, the 32-bit Security Spin, and the 64-bit LXDE and Security Spins are over their respective size targets. As per the Fedora 20 schedule [1], Fedora 20 Beta Test Compose 2 (TC2) is now available for testing. Content information, including changes, can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5787#comment:3 . Please see the following pages for download links (including delta ISOs) and testing instructions. Normally dl.fedoraproject.org should provide the fastest download, but download-ib01.fedoraproject.org is available as a mirror (with an approximately 1 hour lag) in case of trouble. To use it, just replace "dl" with "download-ib01" in the download URL. Installation: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test Base: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Base_Test Desktop: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Desktop_Test Ideally, all Alpha and Beta priority test cases for Installation [2], Base [3], and Desktop [4] should pass in order to meet the Beta Release Criteria [5]. Help is available on #fedora-qa on irc.freenode.net [6], or on the test list [7]. Create Fedora 20 Beta test compose (TC) and release candidate (RC) https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5787 Current Blocker and Freeze Exception bugs: http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current [1] http://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-20/f-20-quality-tasks.html [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Installation_validation_testing [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Base_validation_testing [4] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Desktop_validation_testing [5] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Beta_Release_Criteria [6] irc://irc.freenode.net/fedora-qa [7] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ test-announce mailing list test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce-- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
F-20 Branched report: 20131008 changes
Compose started at Tue Oct 8 09:15:02 UTC 2013 Broken deps for armhfp -- [blueman] blueman-1.23-7.fc20.armv7hl requires obex-data-server >= 0:0.4.3 blueman-1.23-7.fc20.armv7hl requires gvfs-obexftp [bwm-ng] bwm-ng-0.6-11.1.fc20.armv7hl requires libstatgrab.so.9 [cloud-init] cloud-init-0.7.2-4.fc20.noarch requires dmidecode [cobbler] cobbler-2.4.0-2.fc20.noarch requires syslinux [fawkes] fawkes-doc-0.5.0-9.fc20.noarch requires fawkes = 0:0.5.0-9.fc20 [fts] fts-server-3.1.1-1.fc20.armv7hl requires libactivemq-cpp.so.14 [glusterfs] glusterfs-ufo-3.4.0-8.fc20.noarch requires openstack-swift-proxy = 0:1.8.0 glusterfs-ufo-3.4.0-8.fc20.noarch requires openstack-swift-object = 0:1.8.0 glusterfs-ufo-3.4.0-8.fc20.noarch requires openstack-swift-container = 0:1.8.0 glusterfs-ufo-3.4.0-8.fc20.noarch requires openstack-swift-account = 0:1.8.0 glusterfs-ufo-3.4.0-8.fc20.noarch requires openstack-swift = 0:1.8.0 [gnome-do-plugins] gnome-do-plugins-thunderbird-0.8.4-14.fc20.armv7hl requires thunderbird [gofer] ruby-gofer-0.75-4.fc20.noarch requires rubygem(qpid) >= 0:0.16.0 [gradle] gradle-1.0-18.fc20.noarch requires plexus-container-default [grass] grass-6.4.2-11.fc20.armv7hl requires libgeos-3.3.8.so grass-libs-6.4.2-11.fc20.armv7hl requires libgeos-3.3.8.so [gtkd] gtkd-geany-tags-2.0.0-29.20120815git9ae9181.fc18.noarch requires gtkd = 0:2.0.0-29.20120815git9ae9181.fc18 [kawa] 1:kawa-1.11-5.fc19.armv7hl requires servlet25 [koji] koji-vm-1.8.0-2.fc20.noarch requires python-virtinst [kyua-cli] kyua-cli-0.5-3.fc19.armv7hl requires liblutok.so.0 kyua-cli-tests-0.5-3.fc19.armv7hl requires liblutok.so.0 [monotone] monotone-1.0-11.fc19.armv7hl requires libbotan-1.8.2.so perl-Monotone-1.0-11.fc19.armv7hl requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) [mozilla-firetray] mozilla-firetray-thunderbird-0.3.6-0.5.143svn.fc18.1.armv7hl requires thunderbird >= 0:11 [msp430-libc] msp430-libc-20120224-2.fc19.noarch requires msp430-gcc >= 0:4.6.3 [nifti2dicom] nifti2dicom-0.4.6-3.fc20.armv7hl requires libvtksys.so.5.10 nifti2dicom-0.4.6-3.fc20.armv7hl requires libvtkWidgets.so.5.10 nifti2dicom-0.4.6-3.fc20.armv7hl requires libvtkVolumeRendering.so.5.10 nifti2dicom-0.4.6-3.fc20.armv7hl requires libvtkViews.so.5.10 nifti2dicom-0.4.6-3.fc20.armv7hl requires libvtkTextAnalysis.so.5.10 nifti2dicom-0.4.6-3.fc20.armv7hl requires libvtkRendering.so.5.10 nifti2dicom-0.4.6-3.fc20.armv7hl requires libvtkParallel.so.5.10 nifti2dicom-0.4.6-3.fc20.armv7hl requires libvtkInfovis.so.5.10 nifti2dicom-0.4.6-3.fc20.armv7hl requires libvtkImaging.so.5.10 nifti2dicom-0.4.6-3.fc20.armv7hl requires libvtkIO.so.5.10 nifti2dicom-0.4.6-3.fc20.armv7hl requires libvtkHybrid.so.5.10 nifti2dicom-0.4.6-3.fc20.armv7hl requires libvtkGraphics.so.5.10 nifti2dicom-0.4.6-3.fc20.armv7hl requires libvtkGeovis.so.5.10 nifti2dicom-0.4.6-3.fc20.armv7hl requires libvtkGenericFiltering.so.5.10 nifti2dicom-0.4.6-3.fc20.armv7hl requires libvtkFiltering.so.5.10 nifti2dicom-0.4.6-3.fc20.armv7hl requires libvtkCommon.so.5.10 nifti2dicom-0.4.6-3.fc20.armv7hl requires libvtkCharts.so.5.10 nifti2dicom-0.4.6-3.fc20.armv7hl requires libQVTK.so.5.10 [nocpulse-common] nocpulse-common-2.2.7-2.fc20.noarch requires perl(RHN::DBI) [openbox] gdm-control-3.5.2-2.fc20.armv7hl requires gnome-panel gnome-panel-control-3.5.2-2.fc20.armv7hl requires gnome-panel [openpts] openpts-0.2.6-7.fc20.armv7hl requires tboot [osm2pgsql] osm2pgsql-0.82.0-1.fc20.armv7hl requires libgeos-3.3.8.so [ovirt-engine] ovirt-engine-notification-service-3.1.0-1.fc19.noarch requires classpathx-mail [oyranos] oyranos-libs-0.4.0-7.fc19.armv7hl requires libraw.so.5 [perl-Language-Expr] perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) [perl-MIME-Lite-HTML] perl-MIME-Lite-HTML-1.24-4.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0) [perl-MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes] perl-MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes-2.002-2.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) [perl-Padre] perl-Padre-0.90-6.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0) [player] player-3.0.2-32.fc20.armv7hl requires libstatgrab.so.9 player-3.0.2-32.fc20.armv7hl requires libgeos-3.3.8.so [pure] pure-doc-0.57-4.fc20.noarch requires pure = 0:0.57-4.fc20 [python-basemap] python-basemap-1.0.6-4.fc20.armv7hl requires libgeos-3.3.8.so [python-tag] python-tag-2013.1-1.fc20.armv7hl requires libboost_python.so.1.53.0 [rootplot] rootplot-2.2.1-7.fc19.noarch requires root-python [rubygem-audited-activerecord]
Fedora 19 updates-testing report
The following Fedora 19 Security updates need testing: Age URL 54 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-14814/python-glanceclient-0.9.0-3.fc19 19 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-17121/vino-3.8.1-3.fc19 10 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-17836/davfs2-1.4.7-3.fc19 9 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-17925/fedmsg-0.7.1-2.fc19 6 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-18094/php-pecl-xhprof-0.9.4-1.fc19 4 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-18243/xinetd-2.3.15-8.fc19 4 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-18228/polarssl-1.2.9-1.fc19 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-18404/elinks-0.12-0.35.pre6.fc19 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-18378/xen-4.2.3-3.fc19 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-18351/zabbix-2.0.8-3.fc19 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-18493/qemu-1.4.2-12.fc19 The following Fedora 19 Critical Path updates have yet to be approved: Age URL 40 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-15459/kbd-1.15.5-7.fc19 6 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-18128/createrepo-0.9.9-23.fc19 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-18338/icu-50.1.2-8.fc19 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-18369/keyutils-1.5.8-1.fc19 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-18357/ibus-1.5.4-2.fc19 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-18382/nss-3.15.1-5.fc19,nss-util-3.15.2-1.fc19,nss-softokn-3.15.2-1.fc19,nspr-4.10.1-1.fc19 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora 19 updates-testing appdata-tools-0.1.4-1.fc19 cbootimage-1.2-1.fc19 ceph-0.67.3-2.fc19 cifs-utils-6.2-1.fc19 clamav-0.98-1.fc19 code-editor-2.8.1-3.fc19 librepo-1.0.0-2.fc19 libvirt-1.0.5.6-3.fc19 lv2-x42-plugins-0.1.1-0.3.20131005git7db99d5.fc19 mate-session-manager-1.6.1-3.fc19 mediawiki-1.21.2-2.fc19 nspr-4.10.1-1.fc19 nss-3.15.1-5.fc19 nss-pam-ldapd-0.8.13-3.fc19 nss-softokn-3.15.2-1.fc19 nss-util-3.15.2-1.fc19 perl-Pod-Perldoc-3.19.01-2.fc19 perl-Tree-Simple-1.22-1.fc19 pocl-0.9-0.3.git20131007.94d0cce.fc19 python-sendgrid-0.1.4-1.fc19 qemu-1.4.2-12.fc19 tegrarcm-1.4-1.fc19 virt-manager-0.10.0-4.fc19 Details about builds: appdata-tools-0.1.4-1.fc19 (FEDORA-2013-18483) Tools for AppData files Update Information: - New upstream version - Add some tests to validate - Check the screenshots conform to the new size requirements - Detect AppData files with missing copyright comments - Detect files with missing XML headers - New upstream version - Add a rule that tags should not end with a full stop - Allow names and sumaries to end with '.' if there are multiple dots - Detect if is used more that once - Support AppData files of other kinds - New upstream version - Add some more restrictions, and have different values for --relax - Add --version, --verbose and --relax command line switches - Allow short paragraphs when introducing a list - Do not count translated paragraphs in the description check - Do not fail to validate when the translatable tags are duplicated - Require punctuation in the right places - New upstream version - Add an xsd file to validate the AppStream XML - Allow and data in appdata files - Assign each problem a kind - Detect starting a description with 'This application' - Fail validation if tags are duplicated cbootimage-1.2-1.fc19 (FEDORA-2013-18479) Tools to dump and generate boot config table on Tegra devices Update Information: Add support for Tegra114 SPI boot device ChangeLog: * Sat Oct 5 2013 Nicolas Chauvet - 1.2-1 - Update to 1.2 * Sat Aug 3 2013 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.0-3 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Mass_Rebuild ceph-0.67.3-2.fc19 (FEDORA-2013-18492) User space components of the Ceph file system Update Information: fix build on non-x86 64-bit arches Update to newest stable version. ChangeLog: * Mon Oct 7 2013 Dan Horák - 0.67.3
Fedora 18 updates-testing report
The following Fedora 18 Security updates need testing: Age URL 171 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-6117/eucalyptus-3.2.2-1.fc18 19 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-17112/hplip-3.13.9-2.fc18 17 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-17195/spice-gtk-0.18-3.fc18 14 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-17431/thunderbird-17.0.9-1.fc18 13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-17583/rtkit-0.11-7.fc18 12 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-17635/wireshark-1.10.2-4.fc18 10 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-17853/davfs2-1.4.7-3.fc18 9 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-17912/chicken-4.8.0.4-4.fc18 9 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-17904/fedmsg-0.7.1-2.fc18 6 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-18049/php-pecl-xhprof-0.9.4-1.fc18 4 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-18251/polarssl-1.2.9-1.fc18 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-18401/fping-3.5-3.fc18 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-18347/elinks-0.12-0.33.pre6.fc18 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-18373/xen-4.2.3-3.fc18 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-18348/zabbix-2.0.8-3.fc18 The following Fedora 18 Critical Path updates have yet to be approved: Age URL 241 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-2192/nautilus-3.6.3-5.fc18 13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-17583/rtkit-0.11-7.fc18 6 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-18050/gdb-7.5.1-43.fc18 5 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-18164/perl-threads-1.89-1.fc18 4 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-18276/dnsmasq-2.65-8.fc18 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-18383/thunderbird-24.0-3.fc18,thunderbird-lightning-2.6-1.fc18 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-18350/icu-49.1.1-11.fc18 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-18402/keyutils-1.5.8-1.fc18 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-18380/ibus-1.5.4-2.fc18 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-18486/xdg-utils-1.1.0-0.18.20131005git.fc18 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-18392/nss-softokn-3.15.2-1.fc18,nss-util-3.15.2-1.fc18,nss-3.15.2-1.fc18,nspr-4.10.1-1.fc18 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora 18 updates-testing clamav-0.98-1.fc18 lv2-x42-plugins-0.1.1-0.3.20131005git7db99d5.fc18 nspr-4.10.1-1.fc18 nss-3.15.2-1.fc18 nss-pam-ldapd-0.8.13-3.fc18 nss-softokn-3.15.2-1.fc18 nss-util-3.15.2-1.fc18 python-sendgrid-0.1.4-1.fc18 tegrarcm-1.4-1.fc18 xdg-utils-1.1.0-0.18.20131005git.fc18 Details about builds: clamav-0.98-1.fc18 (FEDORA-2013-18482) End-user tools for the Clam Antivirus scanner Update Information: - Upgrade to 0.98 and updated main.cvd and daily.cvd (#1010168) - Add a missing requirement on crontabs to spec file (#988605) ChangeLog: * Sun Oct 6 2013 Robert Scheck - 0.98-1 - Upgrade to 0.98 and updated main.cvd and daily.cvd (#1010168) * Wed Aug 7 2013 Pierre-Yves Chibon - 0.97.8-4 - Add a missing requirement on crontabs to spec file - Fix RHBZ#988605 * Sat Aug 3 2013 Fedora Release Engineering - 0.97.8-3 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Mass_Rebuild References: [ 1 ] Bug #1010168 - clamav-0.98 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010168 [ 2 ] Bug #988605 - Add a missing requirement on crontabs for the cron job to the spec file https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988605 lv2-x42-plugins-0.1.1-0.3.20131005git7db99d5.fc18 (FEDORA-2013-18501) A number of LV2 plugins Update Information: This update adds the new meters.lv2 plugin and corrects compilation of the balance.lv2 UI x42-plugins is a collection of LV2 plugins including a MIDI-filter, fader, convolver and no delay x42-plugins is a collection of LV2 plugins including a MIDI-filter, fader, convolver and no delay x42-plugins is a collection of LV2 plugins including a MIDI-filter, fader, convolver and no delay References: [ 1 ] Bug #1003768 - Review Request: lv2-x42-
Stabilize anaconda development earlier in the cycle.
On 10/07/2013 08:28 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: * viking-ice suggested pushing to have anaconda development cycle adjusted to stabilize earlier in the cycle As I suggested on the meeting I have started that discussion with the Anaconda developers and the thread for that can be found here [¹] Now what we need to do to be able to implement this from our end is to for example move the installer criteria bit out of the general criteria into a targeted installer release criteria since in essence it would be on a release cycle different then from those of the product(s). Another thing is to formulate a test strategy to cover the installer like for example coming up with an specific installer testing team that tests as well as triage the installer to giving the developers enough time to focus on valid reports and fixing those issues.. Thoughts and comments? JBG 1. https://www.redhat.com/archives/anaconda-devel-list/2013-October/msg5.html -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
