Fedora 18 updates-testing report
The following Fedora 18 Security updates need testing: Age URL 174 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-6117/eucalyptus-3.2.2-1.fc18 22 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-17112/hplip-3.13.9-2.fc18 20 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-17195/spice-gtk-0.18-3.fc18 17 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-17431/thunderbird-17.0.9-1.fc18 14 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-17635/wireshark-1.10.2-4.fc18 13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-17853/davfs2-1.4.7-3.fc18 12 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-17912/chicken-4.8.0.4-4.fc18 12 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-17904/fedmsg-0.7.1-2.fc18 7 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-18251/polarssl-1.2.9-1.fc18 5 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-18401/fping-3.5-3.fc18 5 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-18347/elinks-0.12-0.33.pre6.fc18 5 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-18373/xen-4.2.3-3.fc18 5 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-18348/zabbix-2.0.8-3.fc18 1 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-18647/gnupg-1.4.15-1.fc18 1 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-18686/mod_fcgid-2.3.9-1.fc18 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-18802/phpMyAdmin-3.5.8.2-1.fc18 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-18785/libtar-1.2.11-25.fc18 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-18822/kernel-3.11.4-101.fc18 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-18774/icu-49.1.1-12.fc18 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-18814/gnupg2-2.0.22-1.fc18,libgpg-error-1.11-1.fc18 The following Fedora 18 Critical Path updates have yet to be approved: Age URL 243 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-2192/nautilus-3.6.3-5.fc18 8 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-18164/perl-threads-1.89-1.fc18 8 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-18050/gdb-7.5.1-43.fc18 7 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-18276/dnsmasq-2.65-8.fc18 5 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-18402/keyutils-1.5.8-1.fc18 5 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-18380/ibus-1.5.4-2.fc18 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-18392/nss-softokn-3.15.2-1.fc18,nss-util-3.15.2-1.fc18,nss-3.15.2-1.fc18,nspr-4.10.1-1.fc18 1 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-18607/libxklavier-5.4-1.fc18 1 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-18622/selinux-policy-3.11.1-106.fc18 1 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-18590/usbmuxd-1.0.8-9.fc18 1 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-18680/akonadi-1.10.3-1.fc18,qt-4.8.5-10.fc18 1 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-18383/thunderbird-enigmail-1.6-1.fc18,thunderbird-24.0-3.fc18,thunderbird-lightning-2.6-1.fc18 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-18822/kernel-3.11.4-101.fc18 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-18814/gnupg2-2.0.22-1.fc18,libgpg-error-1.11-1.fc18 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-18774/icu-49.1.1-12.fc18 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-18815/sane-backends-1.0.24-1.fc18 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora 18 updates-testing digikam-3.5.0-1.fc18 geome-2.0-1.fc18 ghc-hjsmin-0.1.4.3-1.fc18 ghc-union-find-0.2-2.fc18 glogg-0.9.2-1.fc18 gnupg2-2.0.22-1.fc18 icu-49.1.1-12.fc18 kernel-3.11.4-101.fc18 ladish-2-1.3.gitfcb16ae.fc18 libgpg-error-1.11-1.fc18 libnfc-1.7.0-1.fc18 libtar-1.2.11-25.fc18 mfiler4-1.2.8-1.fc18 mozilla-https-everywhere-3.4.2-1.fc18 nodejs-mysql-2.0.0-alpha9.2.fc18 ovirt-engine-sdk-java-1.0.0.18-2.fc18 perl-XML-Catalog-1.0.0-1.fc18 phpMyAdmin-3.5.8.2-1.fc18 powertop-2.4-5.fc18 python-cssmin-0.1.4-5.fc18 python-flask-assets-0.8-2.fc18 python-py-1.4.17-1.fc18 qt5-qtdoc-5.1.1-2.fc18 rpmlint-1.5-4.fc18 sane-backends-1.0.24-1.fc18 sugar-fractionbounce-21-1.fc18 xyzsh-1.5.5-1.fc18 Details about builds: digikam-3.5.0-1.fc18 (FEDORA-2013-18830) A digital camera accessing & photo management application Update Information: digiKam 3.5.0 BUGFIXES FROM KDE BUGZILLA (alias B.K.O | http://bugs.kde.org): - 324349 : Removing tags limited to 250 selected pictures. - 323648 : Kipi-plugins cannot be deselected or digiKam not reading digikamrc. - 325111 : undo/redo does not take effect in the image. - 325264 : Feature request: Setting in digiKam to only detect faces, not trying to reco
Re: Upstream packages v.s. Fedora packages
On 10/11/13 10:03, Ankur Sinha wrote: > On Fri, 2013-10-11 at 06:20 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: >> I see Does that then imply the problem is, or has been, >> introduced by the packaging of LibreOffice for Fedora? > Have you filed a bug the maintainers can look at? It isn't easy to > diagnose the issue without information to go on, at least a stack trace. > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/StackTraces As I mentioned in the first message a bugzilla exists. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890474 They have not requested a stack trace. On 2012-12-31 it seemed the issue resided with LibreOffice. But, as you can see going through the bugzilla I constantly said it wasn't fixed in the Fedora packages. Since it was reported against F18, the bugzilla was closed. Of course I reopened it. But, I am doubtful that it will get any "real" attention. -- Getting tired of non-Fedora discussions and self-serving posts signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Upstream packages v.s. Fedora packages
On Fri, 2013-10-11 at 06:20 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > I see Does that then imply the problem is, or has been, > introduced by the packaging of LibreOffice for Fedora? Have you filed a bug the maintainers can look at? It isn't easy to diagnose the issue without information to go on, at least a stack trace. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/StackTraces -- Thanks, Warm regards, Ankur (FranciscoD) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Join Fedora! Come talk to us! http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Join_SIG signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Upstream packages v.s. Fedora packages
On 10/10/2013 4:20 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 10/10/13 21:27, Rex Dieter wrote: Ed Greshko wrote: I download and install LibreOffice directly from their site and there is no failure. The installed packages from Fedora exhibit the failure. Since I'm not a packager/maintainer I'd like to understand how could that happen? Upstream's kde integration... is different/lacking (last I looked, it still built against deprecated kde3 stuff). I see Does that then imply the problem is, or has been, introduced by the packaging of LibreOffice for Fedora? Yes. Fedora packages will be using different libraries as well - upstream probably bundles a bunch of stuff. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Upstream packages v.s. Fedora packages
On 10/10/13 21:27, Rex Dieter wrote: > Ed Greshko wrote: > >> I download and install LibreOffice directly from their site and there is >> no failure. The installed packages from Fedora exhibit the failure. >> Since I'm not a packager/maintainer I'd like to understand how could that >> happen? > Upstream's kde integration... is different/lacking (last I looked, it still > built against deprecated kde3 stuff). I see Does that then imply the problem is, or has been, introduced by the packaging of LibreOffice for Fedora? -- Getting tired of non-Fedora discussions and self-serving posts -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
QA:Testcase Partitioning On Software RAID
Minor edits to the test case instructions (there's no longer an encrypt option in Installation Destination) Boot the installer using any available means At the Installation Destination screen, select at least two disks, click Done. In Installation Options, click option "I want to review/modify…" then click Continue. Remove existing partitions, if necessary Create the required boot partitions needed for your architecture as non-RAID partitions. This includes /boot and swap Create a partition, set its mount point to / and set its type to RAID (stripe or mirror are both fine) Optionally, also create a RAID /home partition Finish the installation, choosing all provided defaults Chris Murphy -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Distribution sizes
On 10/10/2013 11:05 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 10:52:47AM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: I'd be nice to have a way to create a local caching "server" that's used by local clients automatically. If a requested package isn't available, the local server gets it from a remote mirror, the client gets the package, yet then it's cached on the server for other clients. Something that just works like this out of the box. Like this https://fedorahosted.org/intelligentmirror/ Probably needs updating. One could also configure Squid or even Apache to effectively do the same thing without any additional software -- see for example http://website-security.info/linux_repository_proxy FWIW - I still use the abandoned InstantMirror locally and still really like it. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Distribution sizes
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 10:52:47AM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > I'd be nice to have a way to create a local caching "server" that's used > by local clients automatically. If a requested package isn't available, > the local server gets it from a remote mirror, the client gets the > package, yet then it's cached on the server for other clients. Something > that just works like this out of the box. Like this https://fedorahosted.org/intelligentmirror/ Probably needs updating. One could also configure Squid or even Apache to effectively do the same thing without any additional software -- see for example http://website-security.info/linux_repository_proxy -- Matthew Miller ☁☁☁ Fedora Cloud Architect ☁☁☁ -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Distribution sizes
On Oct 10, 2013, at 4:58 AM, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote: > > Every single bit counts. Event if you have DVD, why should everyone > waste time and money for downloading or processing unnecessary data? > Ideally, there would be no DVDs at all, only netinstall images > containing anaconda. Then you'll download all other software only when > it's needed. But some people need network independent install media > which must be as small as possible but still useful. I'd be nice to have a way to create a local caching "server" that's used by local clients automatically. If a requested package isn't available, the local server gets it from a remote mirror, the client gets the package, yet then it's cached on the server for other clients. Something that just works like this out of the box. Chris Murphy -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Upstream packages v.s. Fedora packages
Ed Greshko wrote: > I download and install LibreOffice directly from their site and there is > no failure. The installed packages from Fedora exhibit the failure. > Since I'm not a packager/maintainer I'd like to understand how could that > happen? Upstream's kde integration... is different/lacking (last I looked, it still built against deprecated kde3 stuff). -- Rex -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
F-20 Branched report: 20131010 changes
Compose started at Thu Oct 10 09:15:02 UTC 2013 Broken deps for armhfp -- [blueman] blueman-1.23-7.fc20.armv7hl requires obex-data-server >= 0:0.4.3 blueman-1.23-7.fc20.armv7hl requires gvfs-obexftp [bwm-ng] bwm-ng-0.6-11.1.fc20.armv7hl requires libstatgrab.so.9 [cloud-init] cloud-init-0.7.2-4.fc20.noarch requires dmidecode [cobbler] cobbler-2.4.0-2.fc20.noarch requires syslinux [condor-wallaby] condor-wallaby-client-5.0.3-4.fc20.noarch requires python-qmf >= 0:0.9.1073306 [fawkes] fawkes-plugin-player-0.5.0-12.fc20.armv7hl requires libgeos-3.3.8.so [fts] fts-server-3.1.1-1.fc20.armv7hl requires libactivemq-cpp.so.14 [gnome-do-plugins] gnome-do-plugins-thunderbird-0.8.4-14.fc20.armv7hl requires thunderbird [gofer] ruby-gofer-0.75-4.fc20.noarch requires rubygem(qpid) >= 0:0.16.0 [gradle] gradle-1.0-18.fc20.noarch requires plexus-container-default [grass] grass-6.4.3-2.fc20.armv7hl requires libgeos-3.3.8.so grass-libs-6.4.3-2.fc20.armv7hl requires libgeos-3.3.8.so [gtkd] gtkd-geany-tags-2.0.0-29.20120815git9ae9181.fc18.noarch requires gtkd = 0:2.0.0-29.20120815git9ae9181.fc18 [kawa] 1:kawa-1.11-5.fc19.armv7hl requires servlet25 [koji] koji-vm-1.8.0-2.fc20.noarch requires python-virtinst [kyua-cli] kyua-cli-0.5-3.fc19.armv7hl requires liblutok.so.0 kyua-cli-tests-0.5-3.fc19.armv7hl requires liblutok.so.0 [monotone] monotone-1.0-11.fc19.armv7hl requires libbotan-1.8.2.so perl-Monotone-1.0-11.fc19.armv7hl requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) [mozilla-firetray] mozilla-firetray-thunderbird-0.3.6-0.5.143svn.fc18.1.armv7hl requires thunderbird >= 0:11 [msp430-libc] msp430-libc-20120224-2.fc19.noarch requires msp430-gcc >= 0:4.6.3 [nifti2dicom] nifti2dicom-0.4.6-3.fc20.armv7hl requires libvtksys.so.5.10 nifti2dicom-0.4.6-3.fc20.armv7hl requires libvtkWidgets.so.5.10 nifti2dicom-0.4.6-3.fc20.armv7hl requires libvtkVolumeRendering.so.5.10 nifti2dicom-0.4.6-3.fc20.armv7hl requires libvtkViews.so.5.10 nifti2dicom-0.4.6-3.fc20.armv7hl requires libvtkTextAnalysis.so.5.10 nifti2dicom-0.4.6-3.fc20.armv7hl requires libvtkRendering.so.5.10 nifti2dicom-0.4.6-3.fc20.armv7hl requires libvtkParallel.so.5.10 nifti2dicom-0.4.6-3.fc20.armv7hl requires libvtkInfovis.so.5.10 nifti2dicom-0.4.6-3.fc20.armv7hl requires libvtkImaging.so.5.10 nifti2dicom-0.4.6-3.fc20.armv7hl requires libvtkIO.so.5.10 nifti2dicom-0.4.6-3.fc20.armv7hl requires libvtkHybrid.so.5.10 nifti2dicom-0.4.6-3.fc20.armv7hl requires libvtkGraphics.so.5.10 nifti2dicom-0.4.6-3.fc20.armv7hl requires libvtkGeovis.so.5.10 nifti2dicom-0.4.6-3.fc20.armv7hl requires libvtkGenericFiltering.so.5.10 nifti2dicom-0.4.6-3.fc20.armv7hl requires libvtkFiltering.so.5.10 nifti2dicom-0.4.6-3.fc20.armv7hl requires libvtkCommon.so.5.10 nifti2dicom-0.4.6-3.fc20.armv7hl requires libvtkCharts.so.5.10 nifti2dicom-0.4.6-3.fc20.armv7hl requires libQVTK.so.5.10 [nocpulse-common] nocpulse-common-2.2.7-2.fc20.noarch requires perl(RHN::DBI) [openbox] gdm-control-3.5.2-2.fc20.armv7hl requires gnome-panel gnome-panel-control-3.5.2-2.fc20.armv7hl requires gnome-panel [openpts] openpts-0.2.6-7.fc20.armv7hl requires tboot [osm2pgsql] osm2pgsql-0.82.0-1.fc20.armv7hl requires libgeos-3.3.8.so [ovirt-engine] ovirt-engine-notification-service-3.1.0-1.fc19.noarch requires classpathx-mail [oyranos] oyranos-libs-0.4.0-7.fc19.armv7hl requires libraw.so.5 [perl-Language-Expr] perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) [perl-MIME-Lite-HTML] perl-MIME-Lite-HTML-1.24-4.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0) [perl-MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes] perl-MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes-2.002-2.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) [perl-Padre] perl-Padre-0.90-6.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0) [player] player-3.0.2-33.fc20.armv7hl requires libgeos-3.3.8.so [pure] pure-doc-0.57-4.fc20.noarch requires pure = 0:0.57-4.fc20 [python-basemap] python-basemap-1.0.6-4.fc20.armv7hl requires libgeos-3.3.8.so [python-tag] python-tag-2013.1-1.fc20.armv7hl requires libboost_python.so.1.53.0 [rootplot] rootplot-2.2.1-7.fc19.noarch requires root-python [ruby-spqr] ruby-spqr-0.3.6-6.fc20.noarch requires ruby-qmf [rubygem-audited-activerecord] rubygem-audited-activerecord-3.0.0-3.fc19.noarch requires rubygem(activerecord) < 0:4 [scala] scala-2.9.2-2.fc19.noarch requires osgi(org.scala-ide.scala.library) scala-2.9.2-2.fc19.noarch requires /usr/share/java/jansi.jar [scilab] scilab-doc-5.4.1-4.fc20.noarch requires scilab = 0:5.4.1-4.fc
Re: Distribution sizes
On 09.10.2013 21:46, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote: > When operating system distributions had to fit on a spool of paper tape, > 144000 bytes was a limit to worry about. > > With DVD blanks selling for little more than the price of CD blanks, > is there a need to limit the size of Live disros to 700k? > > With double layer DVD blanks and 8 GB USB drives coming down in cost, > is there a need for a 4 GB limit? > > With netinst able to rad an ISO file on a hard drive, is there any limit? > > Perhaps the solution is a 4 GB install DVD with Xfce and no Gnome/KDE. > > On the giant economy size ISO please include Xfce, server and web server > as installable packages alongside the Dev Sys main choice. > > The desire here is to minimize the downtime for installing Fedora on a > server > that is performing useful work. > Every single bit counts. Event if you have DVD, why should everyone waste time and money for downloading or processing unnecessary data? Ideally, there would be no DVDs at all, only netinstall images containing anaconda. Then you'll download all other software only when it's needed. But some people need network independent install media which must be as small as possible but still useful. Mateusz Marzantowicz -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Fedora 20 nfs
On Wed, 2013-10-09 at 09:47 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote: > Did a test install of F20 64bit on my normal workstation/desktop. > > Problem seems to be that after I setup nfs to mount, it won't do it > automatically on boot. And this usually works just fine out of the box > up to F19. I have to mount the directory manually once the system is > booted. > > Is there a particular nfs service that isn't starting/working that > would do this for me or something else? Check 'remote-fs.target': this is the systemd target that controls mounting anything considered a 'remote' filesystem, similar to the old 'netfs' service. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin DOT net http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Upstream packages v.s. Fedora packages
Probably more of a quality issue than a testing issue. I've got a bugzilla in for LibreOffice on KDE (890474). The bottom line for my question is I download and install LibreOffice directly from their site and there is no failure. The installed packages from Fedora exhibit the failure. Since I'm not a packager/maintainer I'd like to understand how could that happen? -- Getting tired of non-Fedora discussions and self-serving posts -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
