Re: Fedora 20 Swastika
On Čt, 2013-11-21 at 07:57 +0200, Gilboa Davara wrote: > On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 9:25 PM, James Patterson > wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > I noticed the new Fedora 20 wallpaper looks like a swastika. It would be > > great if it didn't for the final release, it would upset a few people. > > > > I filed a bug here under wallpapers, but moved it to distro since it's a > > policy decision: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1030643 > > > > Hi, > > I do see the swastika, but it you I doubt that I would have seen it > unless I knew what I was looking for. > In my view, given the fact that the image was never designed to > resemble the swastika, there's no reason to change it. Hi, I'm trying to see swastika there but I haven't been able to do so. There is nothing what could be interpreted as swastika. Can someone draw it and send a picture? I think that this thread is totally insane and sad. But it is probably because people always tend to see things they don't like everywhere (like conspiracies). Petr Schindler > > ... Just to be safe, we can always add a small Israeli flag on the > bottom right :P > > - Gilboa > (Note: I'm Jewish and Israeli :)) -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Fedora 20 Swastika
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 9:25 PM, James Patterson wrote: > > Hello, > > I noticed the new Fedora 20 wallpaper looks like a swastika. It would be > great if it didn't for the final release, it would upset a few people. > > I filed a bug here under wallpapers, but moved it to distro since it's a > policy decision: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1030643 > Hi, I do see the swastika, but it you I doubt that I would have seen it unless I knew what I was looking for. In my view, given the fact that the image was never designed to resemble the swastika, there's no reason to change it. ... Just to be safe, we can always add a small Israeli flag on the bottom right :P - Gilboa (Note: I'm Jewish and Israeli :)) -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Fedora 20 TC2 AMIs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, Final TC2 images have been uploaded to EC2 and are available at ami-3392b55a : us-east-1 image for i386 ami-f794b39e : us-east-1 image for x86_64 additionally if your looking to the AMI's they have been added to files in the release tree http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/20-TC2/Images/i386/Fedora-Images-i386-20-TC2-AMI http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/20-TC2/Images/x86_64/Fedora-Images-x86_64-20-TC2-AMI when we get to final and the images are uploaded to all regions they will all be listed and the file will be gpg signed in the final tree Dennis -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSjZC/AAoJEH7ltONmPFDREnQP/2y5fb33v+9yBxJ6pq0waKN1 KNOTAebB0dRkM5FAZJ70RqywQgwwrvPf77MM61cXto07mjm7/ZCyZ8gnVIyHAftd RzmTALL2sbTVapubGnN1klheXfTrR30Ht7GD5XiNicuJ/4MQ/akW1TJoRbqbOnpB YoP6mY8c+3TDMrETSc18GRS303nzHTsrmHygDlswBdkkSj9kGv5dRqwU7zE0uSUn QJm373KrlxEiWiLKmYJJXbsr3QrcHJ7EBG/vGvo+wux+tywx34+gAdgFDhcV2Q/0 YLz4S112gTqoDMWQM6f2/nmqeGZSonl+fRrxH/oJIp25khA0GhTmVke+ztmfODHT 95i1Xx6VuHNYcRFUkblkVsOkwAIFVch2ISLqNw5kLK64ti1A8vkgjVmMesuVbJNf JrMkU/CcwyCMD0gC1w/ReQDMU5VIdiIGyovV2V+jolQq28UL8TgQnd9xc51ZO28i IIHUOoboyDqCXbIcqTDCiWhuYjdqcAO9JcX7WvoQr6hWawgDmRtVtC4CCbZusSyL 13oK4xfienacnVVPGhcDOJ2wsSCbN0qmByx1HcKatkgw7g/likYhUe5INBVSu+2F lrJ8SUs3C31gu4uIeHRx7+79hI3d3naqAYI9KeSMWco2EoSOkhO0+KTco53IcEJV 7B+7SemC2u4zvWLFU8uH =uaFs -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Fedora 18 updates-testing report
The following Fedora 18 Security updates need testing: Age URL 215 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-6117/eucalyptus-3.2.2-1.fc18 61 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-17195/spice-gtk-0.18-3.fc18 58 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-17431/thunderbird-17.0.9-1.fc18 55 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-17635/wireshark-1.10.2-4.fc18 54 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-17853/davfs2-1.4.7-3.fc18 53 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-17912/chicken-4.8.0.4-4.fc18 23 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-20176/mantis-1.2.15-3.fc18 7 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-21298/drupal6-context-3.3-1.fc18 5 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-21415/python3-3.3.0-5.fc18 5 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-21354/moodle-2.3.10-1.fc18 5 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-20817/python-djblets-0.7.23-1.fc18,ReviewBoard-1.7.18-1.fc18 The following Fedora 18 Critical Path updates have yet to be approved: Age URL 284 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-2192/nautilus-3.6.3-5.fc18 13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-20908/libxfce4ui-4.10.0-9.fc18 9 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-21084/perl-5.16.3-245.fc18 5 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-21375/kernel-3.11.8-100.fc18 1 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-21677/openssh-6.1p1-10.fc18 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-21783/unzip-6.0-11.fc18 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-21776/soprano-2.9.4-2.fc18 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora 18 updates-testing bpython-0.12-4.fc18 easystroke-0.6.0-1.fc18 ghc-pureMD5-2.1.2.1-2.fc18 ghc-snap-server-0.9.3.4-1.fc18 hgsvn-0.2.1-0.1.dev.fc18 mate-desktop-1.6.2-0.10.git81c245b.fc18 mate-file-manager-1.6.3-0.10.gitbf47018.fc18 mathomatic-16.0.5-5.fc18 openscap-1.0.0-1.fc18 pam_url-0.3.3-1.fc18 perl-CSS-1.09-1.fc18 php-aws-sdk-2.4.10-1.fc18 qtermwidget-0.4.0-6.fc18 salt-0.17.2-1.fc18 soprano-2.9.4-2.fc18 sugar-kuku-5-0.fc18 unzip-6.0-11.fc18 xrootd-3.3.4-1.fc18 Details about builds: bpython-0.12-4.fc18 (FEDORA-2013-21787) Fancy curses interface to the Python interactive interpreter Update Information: Fixes a crash when resizing terminal window while using bpython. ChangeLog: * Mon Nov 18 2013 Terje Rosten - 0.12-4 - Add patch to fix resize crash (bz #667934) * Sat Aug 3 2013 Fedora Release Engineering - 0.12-3 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Mass_Rebuild References: [ 1 ] Bug #667934 - [abrt] bpython-0.9.7.1-1.fc14: cli.py:1409:resize:error: mvwin() returned ERR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=667934 easystroke-0.6.0-1.fc18 (FEDORA-2013-21763) Gesture-recognition application for X11 Update Information: Update to 0.6.0 ChangeLog: * Tue Nov 19 2013 Tom Callaway - 0.6.0-1 - update to 0.6.0 * Sat Aug 3 2013 Fedora Release Engineering - 0.5.5.1-8 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Mass_Rebuild * Sat Jul 27 2013 pmach...@redhat.com - 0.5.5.1-7 - Rebuild for boost 1.54.0 * Mon Mar 25 2013 Peter Robinson 0.5.5.1-6 - Drop xorg sdk dependency as it's been provided by devel since F-9 * Sun Feb 10 2013 Denis Arnaud - 0.5.5.1-5 - Rebuild for Boost-1.53.0 * Sat Feb 9 2013 Denis Arnaud - 0.5.5.1-4 - Rebuild for Boost-1.53.0 References: [ 1 ] Bug #1031966 - easystroke-0.6.0 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031966 ghc-pureMD5-2.1.2.1-2.fc18 (FEDORA-2013-21794) Pure Haskell MD5 digest implementation Update Information: Pure Haskell MD5 digest implementation - http://hackage.haskell.org/package/pureMD5 References: [
Fedora 19 updates-testing report
The following Fedora 19 Security updates need testing: Age URL 54 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-17836/davfs2-1.4.7-3.fc19 33 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-19262/quassel-0.9.1-1.fc19 26 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-19963/openstack-glance-2013.1.4-1.fc19 23 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-20202/mantis-1.2.15-3.fc19 7 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-21231/drupal6-context-3.3-1.fc19 5 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-21418/python3-3.3.2-8.fc19 5 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-21397/moodle-2.4.7-1.fc19 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-21786/krb5-1.11.3-13.fc19 The following Fedora 19 Critical Path updates have yet to be approved: Age URL 10 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-21053/gdb-7.6.1-46.fc19 8 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-21194/libproxy-0.4.11-7.fc19 5 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-21422/btrfs-progs-0.20.rc1.20131114git9f0c53f-1.fc19 5 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-21412/perl-threads-shared-1.45-1.fc19 4 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-21435/gnome-shell-3.8.4-3.fc19 3 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-21576/glib2-2.36.3-4.fc19 1 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-21664/pciutils-3.2.1-1.fc19 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-21786/krb5-1.11.3-13.fc19 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-21772/unzip-6.0-11.fc19 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-21769/libwacom-0.8-1.fc19 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-21779/wpa_supplicant-2.0-8.fc19 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora 19 updates-testing apitrace-4.0-4.fc19 bpython-0.12-4.fc19 bsfilter-1.0.19-1.fc19 cups-filters-1.0.41-4.fc19 datefudge-1.18-2.fc19 easystroke-0.6.0-1.fc19 ghc-pureMD5-2.1.2.1-2.fc19 ghc-snap-server-0.9.3.4-1.fc19 ghc-yaml-0.8.5-3.fc19 glacier-cli-0-7.20131113gite8a2536.fc19 hgsvn-0.2.1-0.1.dev.fc19 krb5-1.11.3-13.fc19 libwacom-0.8-1.fc19 mMass-5.5.0-5.fc19 mate-desktop-1.6.2-0.10.git81c245b.fc19 mate-file-manager-1.6.3-0.10.gitbf47018.fc19 mathomatic-16.0.5-5.fc19 net-tools-2.0-0.15.20131119git.fc19 openscap-1.0.0-1.fc19 openshift-origin-cartridge-mongodb-1.12.0.1-1.fc19 openshift-origin-cartridge-mysql-0.7.0.1-1.fc19 pam_url-0.3.3-1.fc19 perl-CSS-1.09-1.fc19 perl-ExtUtils-Typemap-1.00-1.fc19 perl-ExtUtils-Typemaps-Default-1.04-1.fc19 perl-PPIx-Regexp-0.035-1.fc19 perl-Tk-Pod-0.9942-1.fc19 php-aws-sdk-2.4.10-1.fc19 python-whoosh-2.5.5-1.fc19 qtermwidget-0.4.0-6.fc19 ramond-0.5-1.fc19 rubygem-domain_name-0.5.15-1.fc19 rubygem-rake-compiler-0.9.2-1.fc19 salt-0.17.2-1.fc19 sugar-kuku-5-0.fc19 unzip-6.0-11.fc19 wpa_supplicant-2.0-8.fc19 xrootd-3.3.4-1.fc19 Details about builds: apitrace-4.0-4.fc19 (FEDORA-2013-21790) Tools for tracing OpenGL Update Information: Initial package. References: [ 1 ] Bug #1030107 - Review Request: apitrace - Tools for tracing OpenGL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1030107 bpython-0.12-4.fc19 (FEDORA-2013-21792) Fancy curses interface to the Python interactive interpreter Update Information: Fixes a crash when resizing terminal window while using bpython. ChangeLog: * Mon Nov 18 2013 Terje Rosten - 0.12-4 - Add patch to fix resize crash (bz #667934) * Sat Aug 3 2013 Fedora Release Engineering - 0.12-3 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Mass_Rebuild References: [ 1 ] Bug #667934 - [abrt] bpython-0.9.7.1-1.fc14: cli.py:1409:resize:error: mvwin() returned ERR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=667934 bsfilter-1.0.19-1.fc19 (FEDORA-2013-21791) Bayesian spam filter Update Information: New version 1.0.19 is released, including som
Re: F19 -> F20 is supposed to work now?
On Thu, 2013-11-21 at 01:09 -0200, Bruno Medeiros wrote: > I have a recently installed F19 machine and I tried to fedup to F20. > All went fine until reboot... I choose the Fedup option on GRUB list, > but my system boots "normally" after that, I get a GDM login screen. > > > Are problems like this expected for now? Is it worth reporting as a > bug? It ought to work, and several testers reported success at Beta, IIRC. Have you tried running the upgrade as described at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_upgrade_fedup_cli_previous_desktop ? -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
F19 -> F20 is supposed to work now?
I have a recently installed F19 machine and I tried to fedup to F20. All went fine until reboot... I choose the Fedup option on GRUB list, but my system boots "normally" after that, I get a GDM login screen. Are problems like this expected for now? Is it worth reporting as a bug? Thanks, -- BrunoJCM -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
[Test-Announce] Fedora 20 Final Test Compose 2 (TC2) Available Now!
NOTE: The 64-bit LXDE Live is over its size limit. As per the Fedora 20 schedule [1], Fedora 20 Final Test Compose 2 (TC2) is now available for testing. Content information, including changes, can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5808#comment:6 . Please see the following pages for download links (including delta ISOs) and testing instructions. Normally dl.fedoraproject.org should provide the fastest download, but download-ib01.fedoraproject.org is available as a mirror (with an approximately 1 hour lag) in case of trouble. To use it, just replace "dl" with "download-ib01" in the download URL. Installation: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test Base: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Base_Test Desktop: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Desktop_Test Ideally, all Alpha, Beta, and Final priority test cases for Installation [2], Base [3], and Desktop [4] should pass in order to meet the Final Release Criteria [5]. Help is available on #fedora-qa on irc.freenode.net [6], or on the test list [7]. Create Fedora 20 Final test compose (TC) and release candidate (RC) https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5808 Current Blocker and Freeze Exception bugs: http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current [1] http://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-20/f-20-quality-tasks.html [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Installation_validation_testing [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Base_validation_testing [4] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Desktop_validation_testing [5] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Final_Release_Criteria [6] irc://irc.freenode.net/fedora-qa [7] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ test-announce mailing list test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce-- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Fedora 20 Swastika
- Original Message - > From: "Chris Adams" > To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:49:14 PM > Subject: Re: Fedora 20 Swastika > > Once upon a time, Michał Piotrowski said: > > I think that for a sake of everyone who can see a swastika on this > > wallpaper, just change it to something else. > > I disagree. There will _always_ be somebody that can find fault with > anything (especially something as subjective as artwork); you can't just > throw away somebody's work because somebody sees something they don't > like. I've been trying to remain quiet on this thread because it's reached a point of being asinine, but I have to take issue with your language. "somebody sees something they don't like" is a reference to a swastika; someone raised a concern and you were dismissive both toward the concern and toward the symbol. The swastika symbolizes a period when *millions* of people who died and tens of millions of people who had their lives completely uprooted because of the events of that era. It's not "something [a person] didn't like" so don't pin it on a single person raising an issue; that's not neither accurate nor appropriate. I am of Jewish descent, and had family members who were in camps during the Holocaust. I don't see a swastika in the wallpaper and don't really care as to whether the it stays or goes, but I just felt the need to point out the dismissive tone when someone had clearly raised an issue. > > I just see a slanted "H", which I presume to be the intent. > -- > Chris Adams > -- > test mailing list > test@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Fedora 20 Swastika
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Michał Piotrowski said: > > I think that for a sake of everyone who can see a swastika on this > > wallpaper, just change it to something else. > > I disagree. There will _always_ be somebody that can find fault with > anything (especially something as subjective as artwork); you can't just > throw away somebody's work because somebody sees something they don't > like. > > I just see a slanted "H", which I presume to be the intent. > -- > Chris Adams > -- > test mailing list > test@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test > +1 -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Self-introduction: Ramilton
Hi guys, I'm very glad to join at Fedora Bug Zappers Team. I have working a lot with Fedora since some years ago. So, let's time to contribute with the project. I have some experience like translation, Ambassador and i like contribute with team the testing. So, let me introduce myself. My name is Ramilton Costa Gomes Júnior, I'm 37 years old and live at Serra Brazil. My first contact with Linux was approximately 10 years ago and since that year I have been working only with Linux. At my signature I'm sending my contacts fell free if anyone want to contact me. I ask to approve the request I made through my account fas. Thanks, Wiki: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ramilton Fas: Ramilton email: ramil...@fedoraproject.org -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Fedora 20 broadcast address
On Wed, 2013-11-20 at 16:21 -0600, Kevin Martin wrote: > On 11/20/2013 03:21 PM, Louis Lagendijk wrote: > > Some time ago I asked a question about the broadcast address on Fedora > > 20. On my desktop (installed from one of Alpha TC's) the interface is > > brought up correctly, except that the broadcast address does not get set > > correctly: > > Ifconfig reports: > > > >> p5p1: flags=4163 mtu 1500 > >> inet 192.168.159.186 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 0.0.0.0 > >> inet6 2001:981:688d:f2:1e6f:65ff:fed5:7742 prefixlen 128 > >> scopeid 0x0 > >> inet6 fe80::1e6f:65ff:fed5:7742 prefixlen 64 scopeid > >> 0x20 > >> ether 1c:6f:65:d5:77:42 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) > >> RX packets 568712 bytes 540500284 (515.4 MiB) > >> RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 > >> TX packets 359977 bytes 282238000 (269.1 MiB) > >> TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 > > > > The broadcast address is not set when I use DHCP, but is also missing > > when I use static address allocation. When I try a > > ifdown p5p1; ifup05p1 > > the broadcast address is setup correctly. > > > > Today I installed my laptop with Fedora 20 Beta. I see the same there: > > The broadcast address is not set. I originally suspected a faulty nic > > river. But on my laptop is occurs on both the wlan and ethernet > > interfaces. > > > > Does anybody else see the same thing? How can I debug this? With > > NetworkManager I am quite clueless on how to tackle this. > > > > Kind regards, Louis > > > > > Hmm, interesting. I, too, see this happening on a fully updated rawhide > machine using NetworkManager: > > $ uname -a > Linux ktmtoshiba 3.13.0-0.rc0.git7.1.fc21.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Nov 19 02:18:43 > UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > > $ ifconfig eth0 > eth0: flags=4163 mtu 1500 > inet 192.168.238.116 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 0.0.0.0 > inet6 fe80::ca0a:a9ff:feb1:46c2 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20 > ether c8:0a:a9:b1:46:c2 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) > RX packets 912190 bytes 1118290284 (1.0 GiB) > RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 > TX packets 257389 bytes 23661386 (22.5 MiB) > TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 1 collisions 0 > > It would appear to be in the interaction between dhclient and NetworkManager > (which actually starts the nic and configures it, > dhclient or NetworkManager?) as my dhclient leases file also shows a > broadcast address but, as you can see, none appears on my nic. > Seems like a bz should be raised for this. Ok, I will raise a BZ then Thanks for your feedback -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Fedora 20 broadcast address
On 11/20/2013 03:21 PM, Louis Lagendijk wrote: > Some time ago I asked a question about the broadcast address on Fedora > 20. On my desktop (installed from one of Alpha TC's) the interface is > brought up correctly, except that the broadcast address does not get set > correctly: > Ifconfig reports: > >> p5p1: flags=4163 mtu 1500 >> inet 192.168.159.186 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 0.0.0.0 >> inet6 2001:981:688d:f2:1e6f:65ff:fed5:7742 prefixlen 128 >> scopeid 0x0 >> inet6 fe80::1e6f:65ff:fed5:7742 prefixlen 64 scopeid >> 0x20 >> ether 1c:6f:65:d5:77:42 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) >> RX packets 568712 bytes 540500284 (515.4 MiB) >> RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 >> TX packets 359977 bytes 282238000 (269.1 MiB) >> TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 > > The broadcast address is not set when I use DHCP, but is also missing > when I use static address allocation. When I try a > ifdown p5p1; ifup05p1 > the broadcast address is setup correctly. > > Today I installed my laptop with Fedora 20 Beta. I see the same there: > The broadcast address is not set. I originally suspected a faulty nic > river. But on my laptop is occurs on both the wlan and ethernet > interfaces. > > Does anybody else see the same thing? How can I debug this? With > NetworkManager I am quite clueless on how to tackle this. > > Kind regards, Louis > > Hmm, interesting. I, too, see this happening on a fully updated rawhide machine using NetworkManager: $ uname -a Linux ktmtoshiba 3.13.0-0.rc0.git7.1.fc21.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Nov 19 02:18:43 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ ifconfig eth0 eth0: flags=4163 mtu 1500 inet 192.168.238.116 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 0.0.0.0 inet6 fe80::ca0a:a9ff:feb1:46c2 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20 ether c8:0a:a9:b1:46:c2 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) RX packets 912190 bytes 1118290284 (1.0 GiB) RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 TX packets 257389 bytes 23661386 (22.5 MiB) TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 1 collisions 0 It would appear to be in the interaction between dhclient and NetworkManager (which actually starts the nic and configures it, dhclient or NetworkManager?) as my dhclient leases file also shows a broadcast address but, as you can see, none appears on my nic. Seems like a bz should be raised for this. Kevin -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Fedora 20 broadcast address
Some time ago I asked a question about the broadcast address on Fedora 20. On my desktop (installed from one of Alpha TC's) the interface is brought up correctly, except that the broadcast address does not get set correctly: Ifconfig reports: > p5p1: flags=4163 mtu 1500 > inet 192.168.159.186 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 0.0.0.0 > inet6 2001:981:688d:f2:1e6f:65ff:fed5:7742 prefixlen 128 > scopeid 0x0 > inet6 fe80::1e6f:65ff:fed5:7742 prefixlen 64 scopeid > 0x20 > ether 1c:6f:65:d5:77:42 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) > RX packets 568712 bytes 540500284 (515.4 MiB) > RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 > TX packets 359977 bytes 282238000 (269.1 MiB) > TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 The broadcast address is not set when I use DHCP, but is also missing when I use static address allocation. When I try a ifdown p5p1; ifup05p1 the broadcast address is setup correctly. Today I installed my laptop with Fedora 20 Beta. I see the same there: The broadcast address is not set. I originally suspected a faulty nic river. But on my laptop is occurs on both the wlan and ethernet interfaces. Does anybody else see the same thing? How can I debug this? With NetworkManager I am quite clueless on how to tackle this. Kind regards, Louis -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
F20 Final Blocker Bug Review #2 Minutes
#fedora-blocker-review: f20final-blocker-review-2
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2013-11-20/f20-blocker-review.2013-11-20-17.00.html
Minutes (text):
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2013-11-20/f20-blocker-review.2013-11-20-17.00.txt
Log:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2013-11-20/f20-blocker-review.2013-11-20-17.00.log.html
Meeting summary
---
* Roll Call (pschindl, 17:00:42)
* Introduction (pschindl, 17:03:30)
* Our purpose in this meeting is to review proposed blocker and
nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept them, and to monitor
the progress of fixing existing accepted blocker and nice-to-have
bugs. (pschindl, 17:03:44)
* We'll be following the process outlined at: (pschindl, 17:03:47)
* LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
(pschindl, 17:03:49)
* The bugs up for review today are available at: (pschindl, 17:03:51)
* LINK: http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current (pschindl,
17:03:53)
* The criteria for release blocking bugs can be found at: (pschindl,
17:03:55)
* LINK:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Alpha_Release_Criteria
(pschindl, 17:03:57)
* LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Beta_Release_Criteria
(pschindl, 17:03:59)
* LINK:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Final_Release_Criteria
(pschindl, 17:04:01)
* 9 Proposed Blockers (pschindl, 17:04:12)
* 14 Accepted Blockers (pschindl, 17:04:15)
* 2 Proposed Freeze Exceptions (pschindl, 17:04:17)
* 4 Accepted Freeze Exceptions (pschindl, 17:04:19)
* (1029616) ValueError: ('invalid size specification', '0.00 MB')
(pschindl, 17:05:45)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1029616
(pschindl, 17:05:47)
* Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (pschindl, 17:05:49)
* AGREED: 1029616 - AcceptedBlocker - Anaconda crashes when some
languages are choosen for installation (for example French). This
violates the criterion: "The installer must run when launched
normally from the release-blocking images." (pschindl, 17:13:37)
* (1032620) Doesn't remember POP password (pschindl, 17:13:56)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032620
(pschindl, 17:13:59)
* Proposed Blocker, evolution, NEW (pschindl, 17:14:01)
* AGREED: #1032620 would be accepted as a blocker so long as it can be
reproduced from a fresh install by someone else. roshi will attempt
to reproduce and mark as accepted if so (adamw, 17:23:07)
* (1013280) Slideshow in Anaconda 20.21 is only in Enlish language while
in other distros like Ubuntu the language of the slideshow in the
installer is according to the selected language for installation
(pschindl, 17:23:34)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013280
(pschindl, 17:23:37)
* Proposed Blocker, fedora-logos, MODIFIED (pschindl, 17:23:39)
* AGREED: 1013280 - RejectedBlocker AcceptedFreezeException -
Translation in ad banners doesn't break any criteria. But it's worth
to have possibility of having translated banners. The size of images
have to be checked after this patch is pushed. (pschindl, 17:31:51)
* (960381) gnome-shell eats a lot of mem (pschindl, 17:32:12)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960381
(pschindl, 17:32:15)
* Proposed Blocker, gnome-shell, NEW (pschindl, 17:32:17)
* This bug needs more info to have good decision. We will discuss it
next time (pschindl, 17:41:48)
* (1031530) Switching between messages in message-tray doesn't work
(pschindl, 17:42:34)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031530
(pschindl, 17:42:37)
* Proposed Blocker, gnome-shell, NEW (pschindl, 17:42:39)
* AGREED: 1031530 - RejectedBlocker - Even though the notification
area doesn't work properly basic funtionality is working well. There
is no need to block release. (pschindl, 17:50:57)
* (1031848) xkb-converted layouts do not include multiple mappings where
they are commonly expected (pschindl, 17:51:07)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031848
(pschindl, 17:51:10)
* Proposed Blocker, kbd, NEW (pschindl, 17:51:12)
* AGREED: 1031848 - AcceptedBlocker - Impossibility of changing layout
in console makes console unusable for some layouts (for example
russian). (pschindl, 18:02:01)
* (1026860) Instantiated service is not run, it stays in inactive state
(and systemd debug log does not state why) (pschindl, 18:02:21)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026860
(pschindl, 18:02:23)
* Proposed Blocker, lvm2, NEW (pschindl, 18:02:25)
* There are still some information missing. We will try to get more
information and return to this bug next meeting (pschindl,
18:13:24)
* (1026283) Na
yum groupinstall on Rawhide
For a few weeks now, installing a DE by the usual method "yum install @gnome-desktop" no longer works. For some DEs, I can make it work by using "groupinstall" without the @ sign. For others, it says that the DE does not exist. Is the old syntax expected to work again eventually, and if not, what has it been replaced by? P.S. Everything continues to work normally in F20. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Fedora 20 Swastika
On Wed, 20 Nov 2013 12:49:14 -0600 Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Michał Piotrowski said: > > I think that for a sake of everyone who can see a swastika on this > > wallpaper, just change it to something else. > > I disagree. There will _always_ be somebody that can find fault > with anything (especially something as subjective as artwork); you > can't just throw away somebody's work because somebody sees > something they don't like. > > I just see a slanted "H", which I presume to be the intent. Agree, it's Pandora's Box, and no that's not sexist. -- Regards, Frank www.frankly3d.com -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Fedora 20 Swastika
Once upon a time, Michał Piotrowski said: > I think that for a sake of everyone who can see a swastika on this > wallpaper, just change it to something else. I disagree. There will _always_ be somebody that can find fault with anything (especially something as subjective as artwork); you can't just throw away somebody's work because somebody sees something they don't like. I just see a slanted "H", which I presume to be the intent. -- Chris Adams -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Fedora 20 Swastika
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote: > 2013/11/20 Scott Robbins > >> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 08:37:20AM -0800, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote: >> > I don't perceive any swastikas in the current Heisenbug background, >> > and I can fantasize from an ink plot better then the average bear. >> > >> >> I'm Jewish, for what it's worth. I don't _think_ I would have noticed it >> had it not been mentioned, but after reading the list and finally having a >> look for myself, I saw where people might see a swastika in it. >> >> Now that it's been mentioned, I find that I can't help but notice, though >> I >> think that even had I noticed on my own, I would have figured it's just me >> and let it go. >> >> >> > I think that for a sake of everyone who can see a swastika on this > wallpaper, just change it to something else. > > I think that for the sake of the 99.% who don't see a thing except a right-angled wallpaper pattern, just keep it. (This is probably one of the saddest Fedora threads I've run into in a while) -- Jason -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Fedora 20 Swastika
2013/11/20 Scott Robbins > On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 08:37:20AM -0800, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote: > > I don't perceive any swastikas in the current Heisenbug background, > > and I can fantasize from an ink plot better then the average bear. > > > > I'm Jewish, for what it's worth. I don't _think_ I would have noticed it > had it not been mentioned, but after reading the list and finally having a > look for myself, I saw where people might see a swastika in it. > > Now that it's been mentioned, I find that I can't help but notice, though I > think that even had I noticed on my own, I would have figured it's just me > and let it go. > > > I think that for a sake of everyone who can see a swastika on this wallpaper, just change it to something else. Best regards, Michal http://eventhorizon.pl/ -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Fedora 20 Swastika
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 8:45 AM, Chris Murphy wrote: > > On Nov 19, 2013, at 6:27 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: > > I see a closeup of 200 count Egyptian cotton weave. I could in no why, > no matter how hard I tried or squinted, see anything close to a swastika. > > I thought about asking the OP for a tracing to make it easier for me to > find. But after 4-5 minutes of looking at it, I definitely see a pizza… > with the face of Jesus on it. And not the Jesus who puts food on the table, > I mean the Jewish one. > > > On Nov 19, 2013, at 10:13 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 23:00 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: > >> > >> While I do not want to overrule any decisions made, I would like to note > >> that asking for self-selected opinions (in a not-the-most-diverse > community) > >> on whether an item is potentially offensive to a minority is a somewhat > >> problematic methodology. (That we have done in the past for Beefy > Miracle, > >> so... I may be a hypocrite.) > > > > well, so far as I can tell, at least two of the people who've so far > > said they can't possibly make out a swastika are jewish, so… > > I'm a gay, gays were among the many victims of the Nazis. Do I somehow > have better visual acuity to locate swastikas? Fine, I'll use my 21st > century gay powers to put this issue to rest. You've now got two Jews and a > homo saying they don't see this thing. > > Nevertheless, I think we really do need at least a 2nd and 3rd person, > anyone, even Mr. Super White Straight non-Jew Male, see this thing also. > It's either there or it isn't, and it's not like Nazism is exactly an > ideology that works subliminally and subtly either. The context matters, > and I see neither the context present nor its symbol. > > > On Nov 20, 2013, at 5:36 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn > wrote: > > > > Probably related to this: > > http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/concern_troll > > I think we shouldn't accuse people of trolling unless they're clearly > trolling. (i.e. don't resort to play ground name calling unless you've run > out of logical arguments, and you can be funny rather than be a dick when > resorting to it) > > > Chris Murphy > -- > I think I should retract my statement about removing it because of a "swastika" looking graphic. I made the comment in references in order to be kind to people. I strongly agree that it the resemblance to a Nazi symbol lacks any recognition, yet completely understand the reference. I'm sorry that I piped up. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Fedora 20 Swastika
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 08:37:20AM -0800, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote: > I don't perceive any swastikas in the current Heisenbug background, > and I can fantasize from an ink plot better then the average bear. > I'm Jewish, for what it's worth. I don't _think_ I would have noticed it had it not been mentioned, but after reading the list and finally having a look for myself, I saw where people might see a swastika in it. Now that it's been mentioned, I find that I can't help but notice, though I think that even had I noticed on my own, I would have figured it's just me and let it go. -- Scott Robbins PGP keyID EB3467D6 ( 1B48 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54 EB34 67D6 ) gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6 -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Fedora 20 Swastika
On Nov 19, 2013, at 6:27 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: > I see a closeup of 200 count Egyptian cotton weave. I could in no why, no > matter how hard I tried or squinted, see anything close to a swastika. I thought about asking the OP for a tracing to make it easier for me to find. But after 4-5 minutes of looking at it, I definitely see a pizza… with the face of Jesus on it. And not the Jesus who puts food on the table, I mean the Jewish one. On Nov 19, 2013, at 10:13 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 23:00 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: >> >> While I do not want to overrule any decisions made, I would like to note >> that asking for self-selected opinions (in a not-the-most-diverse community) >> on whether an item is potentially offensive to a minority is a somewhat >> problematic methodology. (That we have done in the past for Beefy Miracle, >> so... I may be a hypocrite.) > > well, so far as I can tell, at least two of the people who've so far > said they can't possibly make out a swastika are jewish, so… I'm a gay, gays were among the many victims of the Nazis. Do I somehow have better visual acuity to locate swastikas? Fine, I'll use my 21st century gay powers to put this issue to rest. You've now got two Jews and a homo saying they don't see this thing. Nevertheless, I think we really do need at least a 2nd and 3rd person, anyone, even Mr. Super White Straight non-Jew Male, see this thing also. It's either there or it isn't, and it's not like Nazism is exactly an ideology that works subliminally and subtly either. The context matters, and I see neither the context present nor its symbol. On Nov 20, 2013, at 5:36 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: > > Probably related to this: > http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/concern_troll I think we shouldn't accuse people of trolling unless they're clearly trolling. (i.e. don't resort to play ground name calling unless you've run out of logical arguments, and you can be funny rather than be a dick when resorting to it) Chris Murphy -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Fedora 20 Swastika
I don't perceive any swastikas in the current Heisenbug background, and I can fantasize from an ink plot better then the average bear. I would like to see something less boring, perhaps a rotation of high res pictures of celestial objects and NASA photos. Hopefully the quality will be sufficient to prevent artifacts from appearing on large screens. -- Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX c...@omen.com www.omen.com Developer of Industrial ZMODEM(Tm) for Embedded Applications Omen Technology Inc "The High Reliability Software" 10255 NW Old Cornelius Pass Portland OR 97231 503-614-0430 -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
F-20 Branched report: 20131120 changes
Compose started at Wed Nov 20 09:15:03 UTC 2013 Broken deps for armhfp -- [avro] avro-mapred-1.7.5-1.fc20.noarch requires hadoop-mapreduce avro-mapred-1.7.5-1.fc20.noarch requires hadoop-client [blueman] blueman-1.23-7.fc20.armv7hl requires obex-data-server >= 0:0.4.3 blueman-1.23-7.fc20.armv7hl requires gvfs-obexftp [cloud-init] cloud-init-0.7.2-7.fc20.noarch requires dmidecode [cobbler] cobbler-2.4.0-2.fc20.noarch requires syslinux [condor-wallaby] condor-wallaby-client-5.0.3-5.fc20.noarch requires python-qpid-qmf >= 0:0.9.1073306 [fence-agents] fence-agents-common-4.0.4-3.fc20.armv7hl requires pexpect [fts] fts-server-3.1.1-1.fc20.armv7hl requires libactivemq-cpp.so.14 [glpi] glpi-0.84.3-1.fc20.noarch requires php-ZendFramework2-Version glpi-0.84.3-1.fc20.noarch requires php-ZendFramework2-Stdlib glpi-0.84.3-1.fc20.noarch requires php-ZendFramework2-ServiceManager glpi-0.84.3-1.fc20.noarch requires php-ZendFramework2-Loader glpi-0.84.3-1.fc20.noarch requires php-ZendFramework2-I18n glpi-0.84.3-1.fc20.noarch requires php-ZendFramework2-Cache-apc glpi-0.84.3-1.fc20.noarch requires php-ZendFramework2-Cache [gnome-do-plugins] gnome-do-plugins-thunderbird-0.8.4-14.fc20.armv7hl requires thunderbird [gofer] ruby-gofer-0.75-4.fc20.noarch requires rubygem(qpid) >= 0:0.16.0 [gtkd] gtkd-geany-tags-2.0.0-29.20120815git9ae9181.fc18.noarch requires gtkd = 0:2.0.0-29.20120815git9ae9181.fc18 [ipython] python-ipython-console-0.13.2-2.fc20.noarch requires pexpect python3-ipython-console-0.13.2-2.fc20.noarch requires python3-pexpect [kawa] 1:kawa-1.11-5.fc19.armv7hl requires servlet25 [koji] koji-vm-1.8.0-2.fc20.noarch requires python-virtinst [kyua-cli] kyua-cli-0.5-3.fc19.armv7hl requires liblutok.so.0 kyua-cli-tests-0.5-3.fc19.armv7hl requires liblutok.so.0 [mozilla-firetray] mozilla-firetray-thunderbird-0.3.6-0.5.143svn.fc18.1.armv7hl requires thunderbird >= 0:11 [msp430-libc] msp430-libc-20120224-2.fc19.noarch requires msp430-gcc >= 0:4.6.3 [nifti2dicom] nifti2dicom-0.4.6-3.fc20.armv7hl requires libvtksys.so.5.10 nifti2dicom-0.4.6-3.fc20.armv7hl requires libvtkWidgets.so.5.10 nifti2dicom-0.4.6-3.fc20.armv7hl requires libvtkVolumeRendering.so.5.10 nifti2dicom-0.4.6-3.fc20.armv7hl requires libvtkViews.so.5.10 nifti2dicom-0.4.6-3.fc20.armv7hl requires libvtkTextAnalysis.so.5.10 nifti2dicom-0.4.6-3.fc20.armv7hl requires libvtkRendering.so.5.10 nifti2dicom-0.4.6-3.fc20.armv7hl requires libvtkParallel.so.5.10 nifti2dicom-0.4.6-3.fc20.armv7hl requires libvtkInfovis.so.5.10 nifti2dicom-0.4.6-3.fc20.armv7hl requires libvtkImaging.so.5.10 nifti2dicom-0.4.6-3.fc20.armv7hl requires libvtkIO.so.5.10 nifti2dicom-0.4.6-3.fc20.armv7hl requires libvtkHybrid.so.5.10 nifti2dicom-0.4.6-3.fc20.armv7hl requires libvtkGraphics.so.5.10 nifti2dicom-0.4.6-3.fc20.armv7hl requires libvtkGeovis.so.5.10 nifti2dicom-0.4.6-3.fc20.armv7hl requires libvtkGenericFiltering.so.5.10 nifti2dicom-0.4.6-3.fc20.armv7hl requires libvtkFiltering.so.5.10 nifti2dicom-0.4.6-3.fc20.armv7hl requires libvtkCommon.so.5.10 nifti2dicom-0.4.6-3.fc20.armv7hl requires libvtkCharts.so.5.10 nifti2dicom-0.4.6-3.fc20.armv7hl requires libQVTK.so.5.10 [nocpulse-common] nocpulse-common-2.2.7-2.fc20.noarch requires perl(RHN::DBI) [openbox] gdm-control-3.5.2-2.fc20.armv7hl requires gnome-panel gnome-panel-control-3.5.2-2.fc20.armv7hl requires gnome-panel [openlmi-providers] openlmi-0.4.0-1.fc20.noarch requires openlmi-power [openpts] openpts-0.2.6-7.fc20.armv7hl requires tboot [perl-Language-Expr] perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) [pure] pure-doc-0.57-4.fc20.noarch requires pure = 0:0.57-4.fc20 [python-requests-oauthlib] python-requests-oauthlib-0.4.0-2.fc20.noarch requires python-oauthlib [python-tag] python-tag-2013.1-1.fc20.armv7hl requires libboost_python.so.1.53.0 [qpid-cpp] qpid-cpp-server-ha-0.24-6.fc20.armv7hl requires qpid-qmf(armv7hl-32) qpid-tools-0.24-6.fc20.noarch requires python-qpid-qmf [rootplot] rootplot-2.2.1-7.fc19.noarch requires root-python [ruby-spqr] ruby-spqr-0.3.6-7.fc20.noarch requires ruby-qpid-qmf [rubygem-audited-activerecord] rubygem-audited-activerecord-3.0.0-3.fc19.noarch requires rubygem(activerecord) < 0:4 [scilab] scilab-doc-5.4.1-4.fc20.noarch requires scilab = 0:5.4.1-4.fc20 scilab-tests-5.4.1-4.fc20.noarch requires scilab = 0:5.4.1-4.fc20 [sigul] sigul-0.100-3.fc20.noarch requires pexpect [spacewalk-admin] spacewalk-admin-2.0.1-2.fc20.noarch requir
Re: Fedora 20 Swastika
On 20.11.2013 00:35, Adam Williamson wrote: On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 15:31 -0800, Richard Vickery wrote: On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 11:25 -0800, James Patterson wrote: > Hello, > > I noticed the new Fedora 20 wallpaper looks like a swastika. It would be > great if it didn't for the final release, it would upset a few people. > > I filed a bug here under wallpapers, but moved it to distro since it's a > policy decision: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1030643 FWIW, it doesn't look remotely like one to me or anyone else currently discussing it in #fedora-devel. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net If anything looks even remotely like anything that brings up the horrors of Nazi Germany, including a swastika, it REALLY should be removed, lest we become fodder for some really nasty kickback from Jewish people. This decision to include such might encourage people like Bill Gates - who is also a political scientist, aside from abusing the public with his Microsoft stuff - fuel to kill our organisation - and perhaps Linux as a whole - via the courts. There really isn't any need for alarmism. We're talking about https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/File:F20-alpha-wallpaper-wide.png . No-one is getting sued into oblivion by Bill Gates or anyone else. Why do so many people seem to want to default to OMG PANIC! mode these days? Probably related to this: http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/concern_troll Regards, Dennis -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Blockerbugs 0.4 Released and Deployed
> After a bit more of a delay than we were anticipating, blockerbugs > 0.4 has been released and deployed to production! > > https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/ Love this: http://i.imgur.com/543iFsm.png -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
