F-20 Branched report: 20131211 changes
Compose started at Wed Dec 11 07:15:02 UTC 2013 Broken deps for armhfp -- [avro] avro-mapred-1.7.5-1.fc20.noarch requires hadoop-mapreduce avro-mapred-1.7.5-1.fc20.noarch requires hadoop-client [blueman] blueman-1.23-7.fc20.armv7hl requires obex-data-server = 0:0.4.3 blueman-1.23-7.fc20.armv7hl requires gvfs-obexftp [cloud-init] cloud-init-0.7.2-7.fc20.noarch requires dmidecode [cobbler] cobbler-2.4.0-2.fc20.noarch requires syslinux [fts] fts-server-3.1.1-1.fc20.armv7hl requires libactivemq-cpp.so.14 [ghc-hjsmin] ghc-hjsmin-devel-0.1.4.3-2.fc20.armv7hl requires ghc-devel(language-javascript-0.5.8-28fa88554adf134b03284de53334e91d) [gofer] ruby-gofer-0.75-4.fc20.noarch requires rubygem(qpid) = 0:0.16.0 [gtkd] gtkd-geany-tags-2.0.0-29.20120815git9ae9181.fc18.noarch requires gtkd = 0:2.0.0-29.20120815git9ae9181.fc18 [kawa] 1:kawa-1.11-5.fc19.armv7hl requires servlet25 [koji] koji-vm-1.8.0-2.fc20.noarch requires python-virtinst [kyua-cli] kyua-cli-0.5-3.fc19.armv7hl requires liblutok.so.0 kyua-cli-tests-0.5-3.fc19.armv7hl requires liblutok.so.0 [msp430-libc] msp430-libc-20120224-2.fc19.noarch requires msp430-gcc = 0:4.6.3 [nifti2dicom] nifti2dicom-0.4.6-3.fc20.armv7hl requires libvtksys.so.5.10 nifti2dicom-0.4.6-3.fc20.armv7hl requires libvtkWidgets.so.5.10 nifti2dicom-0.4.6-3.fc20.armv7hl requires libvtkVolumeRendering.so.5.10 nifti2dicom-0.4.6-3.fc20.armv7hl requires libvtkViews.so.5.10 nifti2dicom-0.4.6-3.fc20.armv7hl requires libvtkTextAnalysis.so.5.10 nifti2dicom-0.4.6-3.fc20.armv7hl requires libvtkRendering.so.5.10 nifti2dicom-0.4.6-3.fc20.armv7hl requires libvtkParallel.so.5.10 nifti2dicom-0.4.6-3.fc20.armv7hl requires libvtkInfovis.so.5.10 nifti2dicom-0.4.6-3.fc20.armv7hl requires libvtkImaging.so.5.10 nifti2dicom-0.4.6-3.fc20.armv7hl requires libvtkIO.so.5.10 nifti2dicom-0.4.6-3.fc20.armv7hl requires libvtkHybrid.so.5.10 nifti2dicom-0.4.6-3.fc20.armv7hl requires libvtkGraphics.so.5.10 nifti2dicom-0.4.6-3.fc20.armv7hl requires libvtkGeovis.so.5.10 nifti2dicom-0.4.6-3.fc20.armv7hl requires libvtkGenericFiltering.so.5.10 nifti2dicom-0.4.6-3.fc20.armv7hl requires libvtkFiltering.so.5.10 nifti2dicom-0.4.6-3.fc20.armv7hl requires libvtkCommon.so.5.10 nifti2dicom-0.4.6-3.fc20.armv7hl requires libvtkCharts.so.5.10 nifti2dicom-0.4.6-3.fc20.armv7hl requires libQVTK.so.5.10 [nocpulse-common] nocpulse-common-2.2.7-2.fc20.noarch requires perl(RHN::DBI) [openbox] gdm-control-3.5.2-2.fc20.armv7hl requires gnome-panel gnome-panel-control-3.5.2-2.fc20.armv7hl requires gnome-panel [openpts] openpts-0.2.6-7.fc20.armv7hl requires tboot [owncloud] owncloud-5.0.13-1.fc20.noarch requires php-pear(pear.symfony.com/Routing) [perl-Language-Expr] perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) [php-Assetic] php-Assetic-1.1.2-1.fc20.noarch requires php-pear(pear.symfony.com/Process) 0:3.0 php-Assetic-1.1.2-1.fc20.noarch requires php-pear(pear.symfony.com/Process) = 0:2.1 [php-Metadata] php-Metadata-1.5.0-1.fc20.noarch requires php-pear(pear.symfony.com/DependencyInjection) [php-SymfonyCmfRouting] php-SymfonyCmfRouting-1.1.0-1.fc20.noarch requires php-pear(pear.symfony.com/Routing) 0:3.0 php-SymfonyCmfRouting-1.1.0-1.fc20.noarch requires php-pear(pear.symfony.com/Routing) = 0:2.2 php-SymfonyCmfRouting-1.1.0-1.fc20.noarch requires php-pear(pear.symfony.com/HttpKernel) 0:3.0 php-SymfonyCmfRouting-1.1.0-1.fc20.noarch requires php-pear(pear.symfony.com/HttpKernel) = 0:2.2 php-SymfonyCmfRouting-1.1.0-1.fc20.noarch requires php-pear(pear.symfony.com/EventDispatcher) 0:3.0 php-SymfonyCmfRouting-1.1.0-1.fc20.noarch requires php-pear(pear.symfony.com/EventDispatcher) = 0:2.2 [php-doctrine-DoctrineDBAL] php-doctrine-DoctrineDBAL-2.3.4-4.fc20.noarch requires php-pear(pear.symfony.com/Console) 0:3.0 php-doctrine-DoctrineDBAL-2.3.4-4.fc20.noarch requires php-pear(pear.symfony.com/Console) = 0:2.0 [php-doctrine-DoctrineORM] php-doctrine-DoctrineORM-2.3.3-2.fc20.noarch requires php-pear(pear.symfony.com/Yaml) 0:3.0 php-doctrine-DoctrineORM-2.3.3-2.fc20.noarch requires php-pear(pear.symfony.com/Yaml) = 0:2.0 php-doctrine-DoctrineORM-2.3.3-2.fc20.noarch requires php-pear(pear.symfony.com/Console) 0:3.0 php-doctrine-DoctrineORM-2.3.3-2.fc20.noarch requires php-pear(pear.symfony.com/Console) = 0:2.0 [php-guzzle-Guzzle] php-guzzle-Guzzle-3.7.4-2.fc20.noarch requires php-pear(pear.symfony.com/EventDispatcher) = 0:2.1.0 [php-phpunit-DbUnit] php-phpunit-DbUnit-1.3.0-1.fc20.noarch requires
systemd-journald flush hangs system
Hi, I am facing a weird issue on an f20 test system: During a yum update in an attempt to update this machine from the status ca. a week ago to today's, a message appears: # yum update ... systemd-journald[...]: Received request to flush runtime journal from PID 1 [hangs] After this message, the system appears to be hung and non-responsive. The yum process hangs, Ctl-Alt-FX doesn't work, no visible disk activity. However, pressing the power-off button seems to trigger a proper systemd-controlled shutdown. What is going on? Ralf -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: systemd-journald flush hangs system
On 12/11/2013 01:50 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: Received request to flush runtime journal from PID 1 With limited info it could be the kernel or it could simply be short on space on /var ? Follow http://freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/Debugging/ and see if you get something more meaningful JBG -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: systemd-journald flush hangs system
On 12/11/2013 03:04 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: On 12/11/2013 01:50 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: Received request to flush runtime journal from PID 1 With limited info it could be the kernel or it could simply be short on space on /var ? No. Though this is a small RAM and small disk system, space doesn't seem to be the issue, this time. Follow http://freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/Debugging/ and see if you get something more meaningful Though this issue meanwhile has happened 3 times, I am still pretty clueless. I can't spot anything remarkable or deterministic error message in /var/log/messages (rsp. journalctl). The only noteworthy systemd messages, I am observing is frequent messages of this kind in /var/log/messages: ... Dec 11 16:57:02 gunvald1 dbus-daemon: dbus[580]: [system] Activating via systemd: service name='org.freedesktop.ModemManager1' unit='dbus-org.freedesktop.ModemManager1.service' Dec 11 16:57:02 gunvald1 dbus-daemon: dbus[580]: [system] Activation via systemd failed for unit 'dbus-org.freedesktop.ModemManager1.service': Unit dbus-org.freedesktop.ModemManager1.service failed to load: No such file or directory. Dec 11 16:57:02 gunvald1 dbus[580]: [system] Activating via systemd: service name='org.freedesktop.ModemManager1' unit='dbus-org.freedesktop.ModemManager1.service' Dec 11 16:57:02 gunvald1 dbus[580]: [system] Activation via systemd failed for unit 'dbus-org.freedesktop.ModemManager1.service': Unit dbus-org.freedesktop.ModemManager1.service failed to load: No such file or directory. ... However, when the hanger happened for the 3rd time, I was logged in from remote. From this, I can tell the system is still alive, except that the console appears to be gone. Ralf -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Heisenbug slightly ubstable?
Hi, I have a new (to me) and very strange network problem. The IPV4 is stable, but from time to time the interface loses it's IPV6 global unicast. The ULA and link local are still there. After some minutes the global unicast magically reappears. Restarting the network does work too. The global unicast address is assigned by router advertisment. This did not happens some months ago. Sadly I have no clue when this problem exactly showed up. cu romal Am 10.12.13 23:47, schrieb Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX: On 12/10/2013 10:27 AM, fla...@dailybrood.com wrote: On 2013-12-10 12:12, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote: As some of you know, omen.com has been running on Heisenbug since November. Lately its stability has left a bit to be desired. VNC sessions have terminated for no apparent reason. A number of kernel OOPSes have been detected but the reporting app refuses to send information to Bugzilla because the kernel is somehow tainted. Last night the local net interface stopped working. Machines on the local net could still ping each other but Heisenbug could not talk to any of them. I tried toggling the port with Network Manager to no avail. Restarting Network Manager didn't help either. A reboot was needed to put things back in order. -- Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX c...@omen.com www.omen.com Developer of Industrial ZMODEM(Tm) for Embedded Applications Omen Technology Inc The High Reliability Software 10255 NW Old Cornelius Pass Portland OR 97231 503-614-0430 Hi Chuck, I have no answers, just a few questions for comparison. (1) Are you seeing IRQ nobody cared messages on local interfaces? (2) Are your interfaces using RealTek eth controllers? And, finally, have you done any network performance tuning? i.e. tweaking parms like net.core.rmem_max? Thanks Flash 1: No such messages in any file in /var/log 2. The local internet is interfaced with an Intel Gigabit 82579V on the motherboard. The only RealTek chip on the motherboard is the audio controller. 3. I have not performed any network tuning or any overclocking on this system. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
bluetooth lovers, bluez needs karma
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-23185 This update fixes a bug that's accepted as a freeze exception. It would be nice for it to get some testing, so we know if there's a regression or if it fixes the bug. Thanks. Chris Murphy-- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: F20: System doesn't resume correctly from suspend any more
On 12/10/2013 05:32 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: On Dec 10, 2013, at 4:23 PM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote: Check systemd devel list, thread udev rule not applied after resume from sleep and see if that's related. http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2013-December/015325.html Chris Murphy Is anyone still seeing this? Just curious as I have also been seeing this ... -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: F20: System doesn't resume correctly from suspend any more
On Dec 11, 2013, at 5:41 PM, Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, 2013-12-11 at 17:25 -0600, nonamedotc wrote: Is anyone still seeing this? Just curious as I have also been seeing this ... I am. I can't reproduce it reliably though. It happens randomly here. Maybe need to go to more aggressive kernel parameters to get more information. debug loglevel=7 udev_log=debug Chris Murphy -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Fedora 20 Final status report
Sorry I didn't do more of these, but mostly, the people who've had work to do have known about it, and we've just been trying to get it all done... We have an RC1 compose running at the moment. Go/No-Go is tomorrow (12-12), and RC1 is substantially different from TC5, so we really need to run through as many of the validation tests as we possibly can with RC1. I'll try and notify in #fedora-qa and by email once the key RC1 builds that come out of Koji - desktop and KDE x86 lives, and the cloud and ARM images - are done; we'll have to wait a bit longer for the DVD and netinst. The validation matrices, as always, will be available at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Desktop_Test https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Base_Test Right now those redirects are still pointing to TC5, but we'll bump them to RC1 as soon as we have something to test. If as many folks as possible can pitch in and help test, that'd be great. I and other QA folks will be on hand on IRC, in #fedora-qa and other channels, if you have any questions, from now till the go/no-go. If you hit any significant issues, please report it in #fedora-qa or to the list and/or file a bug and mark it as blocking the bug FinalBlocker (or use the webapp - https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/propose_bug - to nominate it as blocker/FE). Thanks! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Fedora 20 Final status report
On Wed, 2013-12-11 at 17:32 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: Sorry I didn't do more of these, but mostly, the people who've had work to do have known about it, and we've just been trying to get it all done... We have an RC1 compose running at the moment. Go/No-Go is tomorrow (12-12), and RC1 is substantially different from TC5, so we really need to run through as many of the validation tests as we possibly can with RC1. I'll try and notify in #fedora-qa and by email once the key RC1 builds that come out of Koji - desktop and KDE x86 lives, and the cloud and ARM images - are done; we'll have to wait a bit longer for the DVD and netinst. The validation matrices, as always, will be available at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Desktop_Test https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Base_Test The desktop (GNOME) and KDE lives for both Intel arches are now done: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/1953/6281953/Fedora-Live-Desktop-i686-20-1.iso http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/1956/6281956/Fedora-Live-Desktop-x86_64-20-1.iso http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/1958/6281958/Fedora-Live-KDE-i686-20-1.iso http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/1959/6281959/Fedora-Live-KDE-x86_64-20-1.iso As are the minimal ARM builds: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/2005/6282005/Fedora-Minimal-armhfp-20-1-sda.raw.xz http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/2020/6282020/Fedora-Minimal-VFAT-armhfp-20-1-sda.raw.xz the KDE ARM builds are still running, but should be done soonish. Cloud task is complete: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6282038 but I'm not sufficiently cloud-y to know whether you can do anything with the image file from that task, or if releng have to do stuff to it before it's usable. We'll notify once the compose is fully done, of course, but for now it'd be great if folks can get a head start on testing with those images. Thanks! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Fedora 18 updates-testing report
The following Fedora 18 Security updates need testing: Age URL 236 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-6117/eucalyptus-3.2.2-1.fc18 82 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-17195/spice-gtk-0.18-3.fc18 79 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-17431/thunderbird-17.0.9-1.fc18 76 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-17635/wireshark-1.10.2-4.fc18 75 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-17853/davfs2-1.4.7-3.fc18 18 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-21875/389-ds-base-1.3.0.9-1.fc18 6 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-22771/gimp-2.8.10-4.fc18 6 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-22786/mod_nss-1.0.8-27.fc18 4 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-22949/net-snmp-5.7.2-7.fc18 4 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-22866/xen-4.2.3-11.fc18 4 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-22929/dcraw-9.19-4.fc18 4 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-22899/ufraw-0.19.2-10.fc18 3 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-22986/munin-2.0.18-2.fc18 3 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-22993/munin-2.0.19-1.fc18 1 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-23122/firefox-26.0-2.fc18,xulrunner-26.0-1.fc18 1 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-23140/python-setuptools-0.6.49-1.fc18 1 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-23068/rubygem-i18n-0.6.0-2.fc18 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-23215/php-5.4.23-1.fc18 The following Fedora 18 Critical Path updates have yet to be approved: Age URL 305 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-2192/nautilus-3.6.3-5.fc18 12 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-22299/fedora-bookmarks-15-4.fc18 10 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-22457/libbluray-0.4.0-2.fc18 7 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-22690/libfm-1.1.3-1.fc18 4 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-22918/opus-1.1-1.fc18 4 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-22917/colord-1.0.5-1.fc18 1 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-23122/firefox-26.0-2.fc18,xulrunner-26.0-1.fc18 1 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-23140/python-setuptools-0.6.49-1.fc18 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-23224/openssh-6.1p1-11.fc18 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora 18 updates-testing Canna-3.7p3-41.fc18 extremetuxracer-0.6.0-2.fc18 hanazono-fonts-20131208-1.fc18 openssh-6.1p1-11.fc18 oxygen-gtk2-1.4.1-1.fc18 oxygen-gtk3-1.2.1-1.fc18 perl-pmtools-1.54-2.fc18 php-5.4.23-1.fc18 php-pecl-http-2.0.3-1.fc18 Details about builds: Canna-3.7p3-41.fc18 (FEDORA-2013-23203) A Japanese character set input system. Update Information: Fix an error when building with -Werror=format-security ChangeLog: * Tue Dec 10 2013 Akira TAGOH ta...@redhat.com - 3.7p3-41 - Fix an error when building with -Werror=format-security. (#1037008) * Fri Aug 2 2013 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org - 3.7p3-40 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Mass_Rebuild * Mon Jun 3 2013 Akira TAGOH ta...@redhat.com - 3.7p3-39 - Built with PIE enabled. (Dhiru Kholia, #955179) * Tue Mar 26 2013 Akira TAGOH ta...@redhat.com - 3.7p3-38 - Rebuilt for aarch64 support (#925129) * Wed Feb 13 2013 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org - 3.7p3-37 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_19_Mass_Rebuild References: [ 1 ] Bug #1037008 - Canna FTBFS if -Werror=format-security flag is used https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1037008 extremetuxracer-0.6.0-2.fc18 (FEDORA-2013-23229) High speed arctic racing game Update Information: Upgrade to version 0.6 because version 0.4 hasn't been maintained upstream in more than 5 years. Noticable difference besides the more polished UI and new courses: the executable was renamed from `etracer` to `etr`. ChangeLog: * Wed Dec 11 2013 Nils Philippsen n...@redhat.com - 0.6.0-2 - install appdata file (#1036330) * Wed Dec 11 2013 Nils Philippsen n...@redhat.com - 0.6.0-1
Re: Is yum groups broken in f20 ?
On 12/08/2013 08:37 AM, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote: Curious, why it blew up right now, just before F20 is released. It should have happened in alpha and not now. Workaround is to yum group mark remove group name here for every group on the list. What a waste of time. Whatever you do - do not run yum group mark convert. Now one of my systems wants to install every Fedora package with yum update. This affects all Fedoras with yum -120. Here's the parent bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014202 -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Is yum groups broken in f20 ?
On 12 December 2013 06:35, Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com wrote: On 12/08/2013 08:37 AM, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote: Curious, why it blew up right now, just before F20 is released. It should have happened in alpha and not now. Workaround is to yum group mark remove group name here for every group on the list. What a waste of time. Whatever you do - do not run yum group mark convert. Now one of my systems wants to install every Fedora package with yum update. This affects all Fedoras with yum -120. Here's the parent bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014202 It looks like setting upgrade_group_objects_upgrade=0 or group_command=simple sorts that issue out. (FWIW, I went for the big-axe solution and 'yum group mark remove' all the groups yum complained about, ~ 20+ groups). Honestly I still can't get my head around that yum-groups-as-objects change... -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test -- Ahmad Samir -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
[Test-Announce] Fedora 20 Final Release Candidate 1 (RC1) Available Now!
NOTE: The 32-bit Install DVD is over its size limit. As per the Fedora 20 schedule [1], Fedora 20 Final Release Candidate 1 (RC1) is now available for testing. Content information, including changes, can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5808#comment:15 . Please see the following pages for download links (including delta ISOs) and testing instructions. Normally dl.fedoraproject.org should provide the fastest download, but download-ib01.fedoraproject.org is available as a mirror (with an approximately 1 hour lag) in case of trouble. To use it, just replace dl with download-ib01 in the download URL. Installation: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test Base: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Base_Test Desktop: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Desktop_Test Ideally, all Alpha, Beta, and Final priority test cases for Installation [2], Base [3], and Desktop [4] should pass in order to meet the Final Release Criteria [5]. Help is available on #fedora-qa on irc.freenode.net [6], or on the test list [7]. Create Fedora 20 Final test compose (TC) and release candidate (RC) https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5808 Current Blocker and Freeze Exception bugs: http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current [1] http://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-20/f-20-quality-tasks.html [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Installation_validation_testing [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Base_validation_testing [4] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Desktop_validation_testing [5] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Final_Release_Criteria [6] irc://irc.freenode.net/fedora-qa [7] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ test-announce mailing list test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce-- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
