Re: XFS on Fedora i686, armv7hl
On Mar 4, 2014, at 11:28 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > Im working towards making anaconda installs the preferred install > method, which on some hardware today it already is. OK good to know. This reinforces my thinking. Is it sane for ARMv7 to have its own fs default? Or should all of the archs for a product compromise? Each deliverable must have its default partitioning tested. If there are 3x deliverables, that's 3x default partition testing. I don't see that it matters if each deliverable had a different default fs/layout, because that's still just one default for that one deliverable. It's not multiplicative. Whereas before with four Partition Scheme options, 3x deliverables means 12x paths. It's a lot more testing to have options. One default fs/layout is a passthrough for each of the deliverables regardless of what it is, testing wise, but maybe this is untenable for anaconda or for composes? > we make images via > appliance-creator which today doesn't support XFS at all, though that's > easily fixed. OK. Does the anaconda default bind you into making this change in appliance-creator? Or is it a preference? And if it's a preference is it really making things easier to be all on the same thing, even though all offerings would have to be tested in any case? > > We have a 22T XFS filesystem in Fedora infrastructure today. because it > was the only way to get one that big. That 22TB file system isn't running on a 32-bit kernel though. I'm fine with XFS on x86_64, as it's very well tested there. And i686 doesn't bother me much as it sounds like it gets good upstream testing. I'm a little more concerned about it on 32-bit ARM though just because of the unknowns. Chris Murphy -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
2014-03-03 - Fedora QA Meeting - minutes
== #fedora-meeting: Fedora QA meeting == Meeting started by adamw at 16:02:20 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2014-03-03/fedora-qa.2014-03-03-16.02.log.html . Meeting summary --- * Roll Call (adamw, 16:02:30) * Previous meeting follow-up (adamw, 16:07:07) * ACTION: adamw and cmurf and anyone else interested to keep watching and driving the product WG discussions on filesystems (adamw, 16:15:44) * Fedora.next plans (adamw, 16:16:01) * both specs are meant to be reviewed by FESCo for schedule setting purposes on Wednesday (adamw, 16:17:46) * server lists a netinstall and a DVD-style deliverable, workstation lists a live image deliverable. Server explicitly states it will provide media for all three primary arches, Workstation does not talk about it (yet). (adamw, 16:23:51) * ACTION: adamw to ask fesco to consider KDE release blocking status (adamw, 16:26:56) * Taskotron check-in (adamw, 16:29:49) * taskotron currently estimated to be around three weeks behind schedule, meaning staging deployment of autoqa-equivalent coverage in three weeks (adamw, 16:42:54) * Update policy (adamw, 16:43:07) * ACTION: adamw to propose disabling of autokarma on depcheck fail (to FESCo) as a stopgap till more reliable depcheck with taskotron (adamw, 16:58:28) * Open floor (adamw, 16:58:41) * changes are planning to the handling of abrt private bugs: see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1044653 for details and post any concerns there (adamw, 17:03:04) Meeting ended at 17:08:20 UTC. Action Items * adamw and cmurf and anyone else interested to keep watching and driving the product WG discussions on filesystems * adamw to ask fesco to consider KDE release blocking status * adamw to propose disabling of autokarma on depcheck fail (to FESCo) as a stopgap till more reliable depcheck with taskotron Action Items, by person --- * adamw * adamw and cmurf and anyone else interested to keep watching and driving the product WG discussions on filesystems * adamw to ask fesco to consider KDE release blocking status * adamw to propose disabling of autokarma on depcheck fail (to FESCo) as a stopgap till more reliable depcheck with taskotron * cmurf * adamw and cmurf and anyone else interested to keep watching and driving the product WG discussions on filesystems * **UNASSIGNED** * (none) People Present (lines said) --- * adamw (107) * cmurf (28) * tflink (26) * nirik (8) * zodbot (5) * roshi (5) * danofsatx-work (3) * jreznik (3) * sgallagh (2) * brunowolff (1) * misc (1) * mkrizek (1) * Viking-Ice (1) * mpduty (1) * pschindl (1) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4 .. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Testing request: gnutls update for F19
Can folks with F19 boxes available please test and karma the F19 incarnation of the gnutls security fix? https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-3363/gnutls-3.1.20-4.fc19 As I'm sure most of you have seen by now, this is the fix for a significant and very high-profile security vuln, so if we can get it to stable ASAP that'd be great. thanks! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Testing request: gnutls update for F19
Can you please provide direction on how to test this, specifically for this bug? Jonathan Calloway Sent from my iPad > On Mar 4, 2014, at 6:17 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > Can folks with F19 boxes available please test and karma the F19 > incarnation of the gnutls security fix? > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-3363/gnutls-3.1.20-4.fc19 > > As I'm sure most of you have seen by now, this is the fix for a > significant and very high-profile security vuln, so if we can get it to > stable ASAP that'd be great. thanks! > -- > Adam Williamson > Fedora QA Community Monkey > IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net > http://www.happyassassin.net > > -- > test mailing list > test@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Fedora 20 updates-testing report
The following Fedora 20 Security updates need testing: Age URL 75 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-23636/rubygem-actionpack-4.0.0-2.fc20 67 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-24018/varnish-3.0.5-1.fc20 48 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-0792/libinfinity-0.5.5-1.fc20 23 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-2221/NetworkManager-ssh-0.9.2-0.2.20140209git46247c2.fc20 18 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-2452/augeas-1.2.0-1.fc20 14 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-2693/openstack-glance-2013.2.2-1.fc20 13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-2751/zabbix-2.0.11-2.fc20 11 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-2875/oath-toolkit-2.4.1-3.fc20 7 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-3054/python-swiftclient-2.0.2-1.fc20 4 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-3169/rubygem-activerecord-4.0.0-2.fc20,rubygem-actionpack-4.0.0-3.fc20 4 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-3184/freeradius-3.0.1-4.fc20 4 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-3222/v8-3.14.5.10-6.fc20 3 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-3300/pylint-1.1.0-1.fc20,python-astroid-1.0.1-2.fc20,python-logilab-common-0.61.0-1.fc20 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-3338/mediawiki-1.21.6-1.fc20 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-3442/kernel-3.13.5-202.fc20 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-3365/subversion-1.8.8-1.fc20 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-3401/php-sabre-dav-1.8.9-1.fc20 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-3427/net-snmp-5.7.2-17.fc20 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-3421/mantis-1.2.17-1.fc20 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-3446/ReviewBoard-1.7.22-2.fc20 The following Fedora 20 Critical Path updates have yet to be approved: Age URL 112 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-21163/libproxy-0.4.11-8.fc20 7 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-3065/langtable-0.0.24-1.fc20 4 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-3244/audit-2.3.4-1.fc20 3 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-3313/colord-1.1.7-1.fc20 3 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-3292/harfbuzz-0.9.26-1.fc20 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-3330/gdisk-0.8.9-1.fc20 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-3442/kernel-3.13.5-202.fc20 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-3359/control-center-3.10.3-1.fc20 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-3361/libdrm-2.4.52-1.fc20 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora 20 updates-testing ReviewBoard-1.7.22-2.fc20 ahcpd-0.53-7.fc20 assimp-3.0.1270-4.fc20 bluefish-2.2.5-2.fc20 criu-1.2-1.fc20 darktable-1.4.1-3.fc20 devassistant-0.8.0-2.fc20 easytag-2.1.10-2.fc20 gloox-1.0.9-3.fc20 ipxe-20140303-1.gitff1e7fc7.fc20 kernel-3.13.5-202.fc20 mantis-1.2.17-1.fc20 net-snmp-5.7.2-17.fc20 nf3d-0.8-2.fc20 nodejs-asap-1.0.0-1.fc20 openlmi-scripts-0.2.7-6.fc20 qsstv-8.2.4-1.fc20 shogun-3.2.0-2.fc20 Details about builds: ReviewBoard-1.7.22-2.fc20 (FEDORA-2014-3446) Web-based code review tool Update Information: - New upstream security release 1.7.22 - http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/releasenotes/reviewboard/1.7.22/ - Security Fixes: * An XSS vulnerability was found in the Search field's auto-complete. - New Features: * Added support for anonymous access to public Local Sites. * Added support for parallel-installed versions of Django. - API Changes: * The documentation for Review Group Resource no longer says that review groups cannot be created through the API. - Bug Fixes: * Install/Upgrade: * Fixed compatibility with Apache 2.4's method for authorization in newly generated config files. * Fixed an issue on some configurations where loading in initial schema data for the database would fail * rb-site upgrade --all-sites no longer throws an error if there are no valid sites configured. * Administration: * Administrators now have access to all repositories, instead of just public ones or ones they're a member of. * Repositories backed by paths that no longer exist can now be hidden. * Fixed creating groups and repositories that had conflicting "unique" fields. * Password fields no longer appear blank when they have a value in forms. * Setting https in the server URL now properly marks the server as using HTTPS. All URLs generated for the API and e-mails will include https ins
Fedora 19 updates-testing report
The following Fedora 19 Security updates need testing: Age URL 130 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-19963/openstack-glance-2013.1.4-1.fc19 67 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-24023/varnish-3.0.5-1.fc19 48 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-0797/libinfinity-0.5.5-1.fc19 21 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-2260/NetworkManager-ssh-0.9.2-0.2.20140209git46247c2.fc19 18 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-2445/augeas-1.2.0-1.fc19 18 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-2439/maradns-2.0.09-1.fc19 13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-2710/zabbix-2.0.11-2.fc19 11 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-2825/postgresql-9.2.7-1.fc19 10 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-2967/openldap-2.4.39-2.fc19 4 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-3192/freeradius-2.2.3-7.fc19 4 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-3232/rubygem-actionpack-3.2.13-5.fc19 4 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-3253/v8-3.14.5.10-6.fc19 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-3344/mediawiki-1.21.6-1.fc19 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-3420/ReviewBoard-1.7.22-1.fc19 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-3448/kernel-3.13.5-103.fc19 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-3405/php-sabre-dav-1.8.9-1.fc19 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-3423/net-snmp-5.7.2-14.fc19 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-3440/mantis-1.2.17-1.fc19 The following Fedora 19 Critical Path updates have yet to be approved: Age URL 78 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-22326/fedora-bookmarks-15-5.fc19 13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-2734/kdelibs-4.11.5-2.fc19 10 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-2901/keyutils-1.5.9-1.fc19 10 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-2967/openldap-2.4.39-2.fc19 7 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-3052/langtable-0.0.24-1.fc19 7 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-3030/selinux-policy-3.12.1-74.19.fc19 6 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-3142/curl-7.29.0-14.fc19 6 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-3103/hwdata-0.261-1.fc19 6 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-3134/krb5-1.11.3-21.fc19 4 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-3243/cryptsetup-1.6.4-1.fc19 4 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-3178/audit-2.3.4-1.fc19 4 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-3245/testdisk-6.14-2.fc19.1,ntfs-3g-2014.2.15-1.fc19 3 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-3282/iproute-3.12.0-2.fc19 3 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-3308/hicolor-icon-theme-0.13-1.fc19 3 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-3179/kde-workspace-4.11.7-1.fc19 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-3340/gdisk-0.8.9-1.fc19 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-3448/kernel-3.13.5-103.fc19 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-3367/nss-util-3.15.5-1.fc19,nss-softokn-3.15.5-2.fc19,nss-3.15.5-1.fc19 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-2849/abrt-java-connector-1.0.8-3.fc19,libreport-2.1.12-3.fc19 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora 19 updates-testing ReviewBoard-1.7.22-1.fc19 abrt-java-connector-1.0.8-3.fc19 ahcpd-0.53-7.fc19 bluefish-2.2.5-2.fc19 criu-1.2-1.fc19 darktable-1.4.1-3.fc19 easytag-2.1.10-2.fc19 kernel-3.13.5-103.fc19 libcgroup-0.38-6.fc19 libreport-2.1.12-3.fc19 mantis-1.2.17-1.fc19 net-snmp-5.7.2-14.fc19 nf3d-0.8-2.fc19 nodejs-asap-1.0.0-1.fc19 qsstv-8.2.4-1.fc19 sharutils-4.13.3-6.fc19 shogun-3.2.0-2.fc19 Details about builds: ReviewBoard-1.7.22-1.fc19 (FEDORA-2014-3420) Web-based code review tool Update Information: - New upstream security release 1.7.22 - http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/releasenotes/reviewboard/1.7.22/ - Security Fixes: * An XSS vulnerability was found in the Search field's auto-complete. - New Features: * Added support for anonymous access to public Local Sites. * Added support for parallel-installed versions of Django. - API Changes: * The documentation for Review Group Resource no longer says that review groups cannot be created through the API. - Bug Fixes: * Install/Upgrade: * Fixed compatibility with Apache 2.4's method for authorization in newly generated config files. * Fixed an issue on some configurations where loading in initia
Re: Testing request: gnutls update for F19
On Tue, 2014-03-04 at 23:14 -0500, Jonathan Calloway wrote: > Can you please provide direction on how to test this, specifically for this > bug? > > Jonathan Calloway Just ensuring it doesn't break any dependent apps would be useful. I don't know offhand how to check the actual vulnerability has been correctly fixed, but as long as the update doesn't actually make anything *worse*, we can't hurt anything by getting it to stable ASAP, and I'm kinda figuring the RH security folks have verified the vulnerability fix already. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Testing request: gnutls update for F19
On 03/05/14 15:00, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2014-03-04 at 23:14 -0500, Jonathan Calloway wrote: >> Can you please provide direction on how to test this, specifically for this >> bug? >> >> Jonathan Calloway > Just ensuring it doesn't break any dependent apps would be useful. I > don't know offhand how to check the actual vulnerability has been > correctly fixed, but as long as the update doesn't actually make > anything *worse*, we can't hurt anything by getting it to stable ASAP, > and I'm kinda figuring the RH security folks have verified the > vulnerability fix already. Besides, maybe telling folks who don't know how to exploit the vulnerability isn't such a good idea? :-) :-) -- Getting tired of non-Fedora discussions and self-serving posts -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
