apper in Alpha TC5 F21

2014-09-04 Thread Ed Greshko
Installed KDE to disk from the Live CD.

Using apper to check for updates results in a pop up of

A problem that we were not expecting has occurred.
The name org.freedesktop.PackageKit was not provided by any .service file

Installing PackageKit fixes the problem. 

Don't see a bugzilla for it, but maybe it is already known?

-- 
If you can't laugh at yourself, others will gladly oblige.
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

rawhide report: 20140904 changes

2014-09-04 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
Broken deps for i386
--
[APLpy]
APLpy-0.9.8-5.fc21.noarch requires pywcs
[PyKDE]
PyKDE-3.16.6-14.fc20.i686 requires sip-api(10) = 0:10.0
[PyQuante]
PyQuante-libint-1.6.4-11.fc22.1.i686 requires libint(x86-32) = 
0:1.1.6-2.fc21
[audtty]
audtty-0.1.12-9.fc20.i686 requires libaudclient.so.2
[authhub]
authhub-0.1.2-3.fc19.i686 requires libjson.so.0
[aws]
aws-devel-3.1.0-6.fc21.i686 requires libgrypt-devel
[bustle]
bustle-0.4.7-2.fc22.i686 requires libHSdbus-0.10.7-ghc7.6.3.so
[compat-gcc-34]
compat-gcc-34-c++-3.4.6-29.fc19.i686 requires libstdc++  0:4.9.0
[cp2k]
cp2k-2.5.1-8.fc22.i686 requires libint(x86-32) = 0:1.1.6-2.fc21
cp2k-mpich-2.5.1-8.fc22.i686 requires libint(x86-32) = 0:1.1.6-2.fc21
cp2k-openmpi-2.5.1-8.fc22.i686 requires libmpi_usempi.so.1
cp2k-openmpi-2.5.1-8.fc22.i686 requires libint(x86-32) = 0:1.1.6-2.fc21
[csound]
csound-java-5.19.01-1.fc20.i686 requires libgcj_bc.so.1
csound-java-5.19.01-1.fc20.i686 requires java-gcj-compat
csound-java-5.19.01-1.fc20.i686 requires java-gcj-compat
csound-java-5.19.01-1.fc20.i686 requires java-1.5.0-gcj
csound-tk-5.19.01-1.fc20.i686 requires libtk8.5.so
csound-tk-5.19.01-1.fc20.i686 requires libtcl8.5.so
[deltacloud-core]
deltacloud-core-rackspace-1.1.3-1.fc20.noarch requires 
rubygem(cloudservers)
deltacloud-core-rackspace-1.1.3-1.fc20.noarch requires 
rubygem(cloudfiles)
[dragonegg]
dragonegg-3.4-0.3.rc0.fc21.i686 requires gcc = 0:4.8.2-14.fc21
[edelib]
edelib-2.1-5.fc22.i686 requires libedelib.so
edelib-devel-2.1-5.fc22.i686 requires libedelib.so
[elk]
elk-openmpi-2.3.22-7.fc21.i686 requires libmpi_usempi.so.1
[elpa]
elpa-openmpi-2013.11-4.008.fc21.i686 requires libmpi_usempi.so.1
[eucalyptus]
eucalyptus-common-java-3.3.0-0.5.20130408git32052445.fc20.i686 requires 
hibernate3-jbosscache = 0:3.6.10-7
[fatrat]
1:fatrat-1.2.0-0.21.beta2.fc22.i686 requires libtorrent-rasterbar.so.7
[flashrom]
flashrom-0.9.6.1-5.svn1705.fc20.i686 requires libftdi.so.1
[flush]
flush-0.9.12-10.fc22.i686 requires libtorrent-rasterbar.so.7
[freesteam]
freesteam-ascend-2.1-6.20140724svn753.fc22.i686 requires libascend.so.1
[ga]
ga-openmpi-5.3b-9.fc21.i686 requires libmpi_usempi.so.1
[gcc-python-plugin]
gcc-python2-debug-plugin-0.12-18.fc21.i686 requires gcc = 
0:4.8.2-14.fc21
gcc-python2-plugin-0.12-18.fc21.i686 requires gcc = 0:4.8.2-14.fc21
gcc-python3-debug-plugin-0.12-18.fc21.i686 requires 
libpython3.3dm.so.1.0
gcc-python3-debug-plugin-0.12-18.fc21.i686 requires gcc = 
0:4.8.2-14.fc21
gcc-python3-plugin-0.12-18.fc21.i686 requires libpython3.3m.so.1.0
gcc-python3-plugin-0.12-18.fc21.i686 requires gcc = 0:4.8.2-14.fc21
[gedit-valencia]
gedit-valencia-0.4.0-1.20131223git94442bf.fc21.i686 requires 
libvala-0.24.so.0
[git-annex]
git-annex-5.20140717-2.fc22.i686 requires libHSdbus-0.10.7-ghc7.6.3.so
git-annex-5.20140717-2.fc22.i686 requires 
ghc(dbus-0.10.7-56b4210c43a53389843e3822496e305b)
[gnome-python2-desktop]
gnome-python2-metacity-2.32.0-18.fc21.i686 requires 
libmetacity-private.so.0
[gnome-shell-extension-pomodoro]
gnome-shell-extension-pomodoro-0.10.0-4.fc21.i686 requires 
libupower-glib.so.2
[gofer]
ruby-gofer-0.77.1-2.fc21.noarch requires rubygem(qpid) = 0:0.16.0
[hop]
hop-2.5.0-1.fc22.2.i686 requires libunistring.so.0
[ice]
ice-php-3.5.1-4.fc21.i686 requires php(zend-abi) = 0:20121212-32
ice-php-3.5.1-4.fc21.i686 requires php(api) = 0:20121113-32
[lcg-util]
lcg-util-1.16.0-3.fc21.i686 requires libgfal.so.1
lcg-util-libs-1.16.0-3.fc21.i686 requires libgfal.so.1
lcg-util-python-1.16.0-3.fc21.i686 requires libgfal.so.1
[leiningen]
leiningen-1.7.1-7.fc20.noarch requires maven-ant-tasks
leiningen-1.7.1-7.fc20.noarch requires classworlds
[libghemical]
libghemical-2.99.1-24.fc20.i686 requires libf77blas.so.3
libghemical-2.99.1-24.fc20.i686 requires libatlas.so.3
[libopensync-plugin-irmc]
1:libopensync-plugin-irmc-0.22-7.fc20.i686 requires libopenobex.so.1
[librasterlite2]
librasterlite2-1.0.0-1.rc0.fc22.i686 requires libgeotiff.so.1.2
librasterlite2-tools-1.0.0-1.rc0.fc22.i686 requires libgeotiff.so.1.2
[libreatlas]
libreatlas-1.0.0a-8.fc22.i686 requires libgeotiff.so.1.2
[llvm]
llvm-ocaml-3.4-15.fc22.i686 requires ocaml(Pervasives) = 
0:4329e57fde14cc94b02a739d2595516b
[ltsp]
ltsp-client-5.4.5-8.fc21.i686 requires fuse-unionfs
ltsp-server-5.4.5-8.fc21.i686 requires cdialog
[meshmagick]
meshmagick-0.6.0-20.svn2898.fc21.i686 requires libOgreMain.so.1.8.1
meshmagick-libs-0.6.0-20.svn2898.fc21.i686 requires libOgreMain.so.1.8.1

F-21 Branched report: 20140904 changes

2014-09-04 Thread Fedora Branched Report
Compose started at Thu Sep  4 07:15:02 UTC 2014

Broken deps for armhfp
--
[APLpy]
APLpy-0.9.8-5.fc21.noarch requires pywcs
[PyKDE]
PyKDE-3.16.6-14.fc20.armv7hl requires sip-api(10) = 0:10.0
[PyQuante]
PyQuante-libint-1.6.4-11.fc21.1.armv7hl requires libint(armv7hl-32) = 
0:1.1.6-2.fc21
[audtty]
audtty-0.1.12-9.fc20.armv7hl requires libaudclient.so.2
[authhub]
authhub-0.1.2-3.fc19.armv7hl requires libjson.so.0
[couchdb]
couchdb-1.6.0-9.fc21.armv7hl requires erlang(erl_nif_version) = 0:2.4
couchdb-1.6.0-9.fc21.armv7hl requires erlang(erl_drv_version) = 0:2.2
[cp2k]
cp2k-2.5.1-8.fc21.armv7hl requires libint(armv7hl-32) = 0:1.1.6-2.fc21
cp2k-mpich-2.5.1-8.fc21.armv7hl requires libint(armv7hl-32) = 
0:1.1.6-2.fc21
cp2k-openmpi-2.5.1-8.fc21.armv7hl requires libmpi_usempi.so.1
cp2k-openmpi-2.5.1-8.fc21.armv7hl requires libint(armv7hl-32) = 
0:1.1.6-2.fc21
[csound]
csound-java-5.19.01-1.fc20.armv7hl requires libgcj_bc.so.1
csound-java-5.19.01-1.fc20.armv7hl requires java-gcj-compat
csound-java-5.19.01-1.fc20.armv7hl requires java-gcj-compat
csound-java-5.19.01-1.fc20.armv7hl requires java-1.5.0-gcj
csound-tk-5.19.01-1.fc20.armv7hl requires libtk8.5.so
csound-tk-5.19.01-1.fc20.armv7hl requires libtcl8.5.so
[deltacloud-core]
deltacloud-core-rackspace-1.1.3-1.fc20.noarch requires 
rubygem(cloudservers)
deltacloud-core-rackspace-1.1.3-1.fc20.noarch requires 
rubygem(cloudfiles)
[docker-registry]
docker-registry-0.7.3-1.fc21.noarch requires docker-io
[dragonegg]
dragonegg-3.4-0.3.rc0.fc21.armv7hl requires gcc = 0:4.8.2-14.fc21
[edelib]
edelib-2.1-5.fc21.armv7hl requires libedelib.so
edelib-devel-2.1-5.fc21.armv7hl requires libedelib.so
[ejabberd]
ejabberd-2.1.13-8.fc21.armv7hl requires erlang(erl_drv_version) = 0:2.2
[elpa]
elpa-openmpi-2013.11-4.008.fc21.armv7hl requires libmpi_usempi.so.1
[erlang-basho_metrics]
erlang-basho_metrics-1.0.0-10.fc21.armv7hl requires 
erlang(erl_nif_version) = 0:2.4
[erlang-bitcask]
erlang-bitcask-1.6.3-1.fc20.armv7hl requires erlang(erl_nif_version) = 
0:2.4
[erlang-cl]
erlang-cl-1.2.1-2.fc21.armv7hl requires erlang(erl_nif_version) = 0:2.4
[erlang-ebloom]
erlang-ebloom-1.1.2-4.fc21.armv7hl requires erlang(erl_nif_version) = 
0:2.4
[erlang-eleveldb]
erlang-eleveldb-1.3.2-2.fc20.armv7hl requires erlang(erl_nif_version) = 
0:2.4
[erlang-emmap]
erlang-emmap-0-0.8.git05ae1bb.fc21.armv7hl requires 
erlang(erl_nif_version) = 0:2.4
[erlang-erlsyslog]
erlang-erlsyslog-0.6.2-6.fc21.armv7hl requires erlang(erl_drv_version) 
= 0:2.2
[erlang-esasl]
erlang-esasl-0.1-15.20120116git665cc80.fc21.armv7hl requires 
erlang(erl_drv_version) = 0:2.2
[erlang-esdl]
erlang-esdl-1.3.1-3.fc21.armv7hl requires erlang(erl_drv_version) = 
0:2.2
[erlang-js]
erlang-js-1.2.2-5.fc21.armv7hl requires erlang(erl_drv_version) = 0:2.2
[erlang-sd_notify]
erlang-sd_notify-0.1-1.fc21.armv7hl requires erlang(erl_nif_version) = 
0:2.4
[erlang-skerl]
erlang-skerl-1.1.0-7.fc21.armv7hl requires erlang(erl_nif_version) = 
0:2.4
[erlang-snappy]
erlang-snappy-1.0.3-0.7.git80db168.fc21.armv7hl requires 
erlang(erl_nif_version) = 0:2.4
[eucalyptus]
eucalyptus-common-java-3.3.0-0.5.20130408git32052445.fc20.armv7hl 
requires hibernate3-jbosscache = 0:3.6.10-7
[fatrat]
1:fatrat-1.2.0-0.21.beta2.fc21.armv7hl requires 
libtorrent-rasterbar.so.7
[flashrom]
flashrom-0.9.6.1-5.svn1705.fc20.armv7hl requires libftdi.so.1
[flush]
flush-0.9.12-10.fc21.armv7hl requires libtorrent-rasterbar.so.7
[freesteam]
freesteam-ascend-2.1-6.20140724svn753.fc21.armv7hl requires 
libascend.so.1
[gcc-python-plugin]
gcc-python2-debug-plugin-0.12-18.fc21.armv7hl requires gcc = 
0:4.8.2-14.fc21
gcc-python2-plugin-0.12-18.fc21.armv7hl requires gcc = 0:4.8.2-14.fc21
gcc-python3-debug-plugin-0.12-18.fc21.armv7hl requires 
libpython3.3dm.so.1.0
gcc-python3-debug-plugin-0.12-18.fc21.armv7hl requires gcc = 
0:4.8.2-14.fc21
gcc-python3-plugin-0.12-18.fc21.armv7hl requires libpython3.3m.so.1.0
gcc-python3-plugin-0.12-18.fc21.armv7hl requires gcc = 0:4.8.2-14.fc21
[gedit-valencia]
gedit-valencia-0.4.0-1.20131223git94442bf.fc21.armv7hl requires 
libvala-0.24.so.0
[ghc-hint]
ghc-hint-devel-0.4.2.0-2.fc21.armv7hl requires 
ghc-devel(ghc-7.6.3-9662c0f342b2d5c9e1cd2b6330e697bc)
[gnome-python2-desktop]
gnome-python2-metacity-2.32.0-18.fc21.armv7hl requires 
libmetacity-private.so.0
[gnome-shell-extension-pomodoro]
gnome-shell-extension-pomodoro-0.10.0-4.fc21.armv7hl requires 
libupower-glib.so.2
[gofer]
ruby-gofer-0.77.1-2.fc21.noarch requires rubygem(qpid) = 0:0.16.0
[hibernate-search]

Re: apper in Alpha TC5 F21

2014-09-04 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2014-09-04 at 17:43 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
 Installed KDE to disk from the Live CD.
 
 Using apper to check for updates results in a pop up of
 
 A problem that we were not expecting has occurred.
 The name org.freedesktop.PackageKit was not provided by any .service file
 
 Installing PackageKit fixes the problem. 
 
 Don't see a bugzilla for it, but maybe it is already known?

So, apper requires 'PackageKit-qt', which sounds sane, but
'PackageKit-qt' doesn't require PackageKit. Looks like that's already
filed:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1003122
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: apper in Alpha TC5 F21

2014-09-04 Thread José Matos
On Thursday 04 September 2014 17:43:16 Ed Greshko wrote:
 Installed KDE to disk from the Live CD.
 
 Using apper to check for updates results in a pop up of
 
 A problem that we were not expecting has occurred.
 The name org.freedesktop.PackageKit was not provided by any .service file
 
 Installing PackageKit fixes the problem. 
 
 Don't see a bugzilla for it, but maybe it is already known?

This is a me too post. :-)

In one machine that I have updated using dnf I get the same (pesky) warning. 
Pesky because to get to the pop up you need to go to an empty desktop to be 
able to close it as it seems to be present in all (virtual) desktop but behind 
all the open windows.

Note that it happens even without me checking apper, although possibly the 
check for updates is the culprit.

Although I am not able to verify now I suspect that at some point in time I 
have removed PackageKit from the system.

Regards,
-- 
José Abílio-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: apper in Alpha TC5 F21

2014-09-04 Thread Ed Greshko
On 09/04/14 21:22, Adam Williamson wrote:
 On Thu, 2014-09-04 at 17:43 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
 Installed KDE to disk from the Live CD.

 Using apper to check for updates results in a pop up of

 A problem that we were not expecting has occurred.
 The name org.freedesktop.PackageKit was not provided by any .service file

 Installing PackageKit fixes the problem. 

 Don't see a bugzilla for it, but maybe it is already known?
 So, apper requires 'PackageKit-qt', which sounds sane, but
 'PackageKit-qt' doesn't require PackageKit. Looks like that's already
 filed:

 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1003122

OK.  I only searched F21 and Rawhide since I couldn't believe it was an old 
issue.  :-) :-)

-- 
If you can't laugh at yourself, others will gladly oblige.
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: apper in Alpha TC5 F21

2014-09-04 Thread Richard Hughes
On 4 September 2014 14:22, Adam Williamson adamw...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
 So, apper requires 'PackageKit-qt', which sounds sane, but
 'PackageKit-qt' doesn't require PackageKit. Looks like that's already
 filed:

Either that, or apper should require PackageKit directly -- IIRC there
was some push a few releases ago to be able to install the client
libraries and not the daemon for people that wanted nothing to do with
PackageKit; depends on how much we care about those people :)

Richard.
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

yum fails - Fedora-Minimal-armhfp-21-20140904-sda.raw.xz

2014-09-04 Thread Robert Moskowitz

On a Cubietruck -

# yum install  policycoreutils-python --nogpgcheck


 One of the configured repositories failed (Fedora 21 - armhfp),
 and yum doesn't have enough cached data to continue. At this point the 
only

 safe thing yum can do is fail. There are a few ways to work fix this:


I will fall back to 9/1 and test with that.

--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: yum fails - Fedora-Minimal-armhfp-21-20140904-sda.raw.xz

2014-09-04 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
 On a Cubietruck -

 # yum install  policycoreutils-python --nogpgcheck

All packages should now be signed so you can drop the --nogpgcheck

  One of the configured repositories failed (Fedora 21 - armhfp),
  and yum doesn't have enough cached data to continue. At this point the only
  safe thing yum can do is fail. There are a few ways to work fix this:

Is your date/time correct?

Peter
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: yum fails - Fedora-Minimal-armhfp-21-20140904-sda.raw.xz

2014-09-04 Thread Robert Moskowitz


On 09/04/2014 11:15 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:

On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote:

On a Cubietruck -

# yum install  policycoreutils-python --nogpgcheck

All packages should now be signed so you can drop the --nogpgcheck


good.




  One of the configured repositories failed (Fedora 21 - armhfp),
  and yum doesn't have enough cached data to continue. At this point the only
  safe thing yum can do is fail. There are a few ways to work fix this:

Is your date/time correct?


It should have been via ntp.  But I can't find where I put that SDcard 
to check it out.  Too many SDcards sitting on my desk from all this 
testing.  On a side note, I am 'inventing' an SDcard organizer for all 
the SDcards I have sitting around; the cubie's card reader will not 
allow space for a attaching a label.


So anyway, it looks like making a new SDcard and trying again.


--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Really eth0 problem - Re: yum fails - Fedora-Minimal-armhfp-21-20140904-sda.raw.xz

2014-09-04 Thread Robert Moskowitz


On 09/04/2014 11:15 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:

On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote:

On a Cubietruck -

# yum install  policycoreutils-python --nogpgcheck

All packages should now be signed so you can drop the --nogpgcheck


  One of the configured repositories failed (Fedora 21 - armhfp),
  and yum doesn't have enough cached data to continue. At this point the only
  safe thing yum can do is fail. There are a few ways to work fix this:

Is your date/time correct?


I think it might be worst than date/time.  I found the SDcard I was 
working with and booted up.  No IP addresses on eth0, so no ntp, and why 
THAT yum message?  Because date/time was essentially ZERO?


I never thought to check on the ethernet.  I have only started working 
on my 1 Cubietruck, after getting 5 Cubieboard2 systems put into 
production.  4 running Redsleeve (with F19 uboot), and 1 F20. I have run 
F19 on this Cubietruck with no problems with ethernet. So something is 
broken on the Cubietruck uboot support.


Here is what I am seeing on ethernet on the serial console:

[   36.360611] eth0: device MAC address 56:bb:b8:7a:b2:d6
[   36.386336]  No MAC Management Counters available
[   36.455808]  No MAC Management Counters available
[   36.473714] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not ready
[   40.41] stmmaceth 1c5.ethernet eth0: Link is Up - 10
0Mbps/Full - flow control off
[   40.433554] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth0: link becomes ready

Last login: Thu Jan  1 00:00:49 on ttyS0
[root@localhost ~]# ip addr show
1: lo: LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN 
group default

link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
   valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 ::1/128 scope host
   valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
2: eth0: BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast 
state UP group default qlen 1000

link/ether 56:bb:b8:7a:b2:d6 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff


--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Introduction: Naresh

2014-09-04 Thread Naresh Vijayakumar
Thanks for the links Amita. I'll start once the ISO download completes. :)


On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Amita Sharma amsha...@redhat.com wrote:


 On 09/03/2014 11:59 AM, Naresh Vijayakumar wrote:

 Hi everyone!

 Hello Naresh,

 Welcome to community  :)

  I just finished with creating all the accounts and I am very excited to
 be a part of the QA team. I knew of Redhat Linux in 2004  when I was only a
 kid (4th grade maybe) but used it only for Tux-racer :P . A couple of years
 back I started using Linux more regularly. Earlier I used a different
 distro but because their new version caused some overheating problems, I
 switched to Fedora. I then realized Fedora was cooler!

 yeah, No doubt about that :)

  I have so far been only  'normal' user of Fedora and I need to know a
 lot more about the its internals.

  A little about myself...
 I am a Computer Science undergraduate from Bangalore, India. I have always
 loved coding and so I immediately felt Bug Zappers is the group for me. I
 am also interested in contributing towards v21 release though I am still
 figuring out how to start!

 Nice to know about you, AFAIK, The BugZappers group is dormant at present,
 but still you can contribute in many exciting ways in Fedora QA -
 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Join

 For Fedora 21 Testing , Fedora 21 Alpha Test Compose 5 (TC5) is now
 available for testing. There is a nice announcement mail on this list with
 subject [Test-Announce] Fedora 21 Alpha Test Compose 5 (TC5) Available
 Now! by Petr, you will get all the required URLs/links from that mail.

 Also, if you love coding then you can contribute to some feature
 development in new testing framework Taskotron -
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jMTUFCFJS6o

  https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5940#comment:7


  You can contact me through mail or a Hangouts message. Also, my IRC
 nickname on freenode is *rexybytes* .

 Happy to have you, thanks for joining.

 - Amita



  --
 Naresh

 Alt+F4




 --
 test mailing list
 test@lists.fedoraproject.org
 To unsubscribe:
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test




-- 
--
Naresh

Alt+F4
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: apper in Alpha TC5 F21

2014-09-04 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2014-09-04 at 14:28 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
 On 4 September 2014 14:22, Adam Williamson adamw...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
  So, apper requires 'PackageKit-qt', which sounds sane, but
  'PackageKit-qt' doesn't require PackageKit. Looks like that's already
  filed:
 
 Either that, or apper should require PackageKit directly -- IIRC there
 was some push a few releases ago to be able to install the client
 libraries and not the daemon for people that wanted nothing to do with
 PackageKit; depends on how much we care about those people :)

Welp, I asked rdieter and he said it looked like a no-brainer, so I went
ahead and 'fixed' it. Does apper work for package installation/removal
without PackageKit installed? And can you remove apper without KDE going
away?
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Introduction: Naresh

2014-09-04 Thread Amita Sharma


On 09/04/2014 09:52 PM, Naresh Vijayakumar wrote:

Thanks for the links Amita. I'll start once the ISO download completes. :)

your welcome Naresh, good luck!



On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Amita Sharma amsha...@redhat.com 
mailto:amsha...@redhat.com wrote:



On 09/03/2014 11:59 AM, Naresh Vijayakumar wrote:

Hi everyone!

Hello Naresh,

Welcome to community  :)


I just finished with creating all the accounts and I am very
excited to be a part of the QA team. I knew of Redhat Linux in
2004  when I was only a kid (4th grade maybe) but used it only
for Tux-racer :P . A couple of years back I started using Linux
more regularly. Earlier I used a different distro but because
their new version caused some overheating problems, I switched to
Fedora. I then realized Fedora was cooler!

yeah, No doubt about that :)


I have so far been only  'normal' user of Fedora and I need to
know a lot more about the its internals.

A little about myself...
I am a Computer Science undergraduate from Bangalore, India. I
have always loved coding and so I immediately felt Bug Zappers is
the group for me. I am also interested in contributing towards
v21 release though I am still figuring out how to start!

Nice to know about you, AFAIK, The BugZappers group is dormant at
present, but still you can contribute in many exciting ways in
Fedora QA - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Join

For Fedora 21 Testing , Fedora 21 Alpha Test Compose 5 (TC5) is
now available for testing. There is a nice announcement mail on
this list with subject [Test-Announce] Fedora 21 Alpha Test
Compose 5 (TC5) Available Now! by Petr, you will get all the
required URLs/links from that mail.

Also, if you love coding then you can contribute to some feature
development in new testing framework Taskotron -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jMTUFCFJS6o



You can contact me through mail or a Hangouts message. Also, my
IRC nickname on freenode is /rexybytes/ .

Happy to have you, thanks for joining.

- Amita




--
Naresh

Alt+F4





--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org mailto:test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test




--
--
Naresh

Alt+F4




-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Fedora 21 at omen.com

2014-09-04 Thread Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX

Yesterday I installed Fedora 21 net install using the boot.iso.

Installation of the Xfce desktop proceeded smoothly.

Two problems, previously reported, persist.

After installing and running system-config-printer lp and lpr
produce blank pages as previously reported.
Workaround: enscript

Tigervnc server sessions of the Xfce desktop stop within a
second or so.  I compiled tigervnc from source and tested
that on another machine with the same problem.
Workaround: force install tigervnc from Fedora 20.
This causes yum to croak if tigervnc is mentioned.

Otherwise Fedora 21 seems to be running normally on omen.com.
The new gnome-terminal is much appreciated.

--
 Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX   c...@omen.com   www.omen.com
Developer of Industrial ZMODEM(Tm) for Embedded Applications
  Omen Technology Inc  The High Reliability Software
10255 NW Old Cornelius Pass Portland OR 97231   503-614-0430

--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: apper in Alpha TC5 F21

2014-09-04 Thread Rex Dieter
Adam Williamson wrote:

 Does apper work for package installation/removal
 without PackageKit installed? And can you remove apper without KDE 
going
 away?

Pretty sure the answer to those are (should be!): no, yes, respectively.

-- rex

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: apper in Alpha TC5 F21

2014-09-04 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2014-09-04 at 14:29 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
 Adam Williamson wrote:
 
  Does apper work for package installation/removal
  without PackageKit installed? And can you remove apper without KDE 
 going
  away?
 
 Pretty sure the answer to those are (should be!): no, yes, respectively.

so, it seems pretty pointless to support having PackageKit-Qt around
without PackageKit, right? I think it's fine to just make sure apper
lifts out, for people who want to yank PackageKit.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Fedora 21 Alpha Release Readiness Meeting :: Thursday, Sep. 04, 19:00 UTC

2014-09-04 Thread Jaroslav Reznik
==
#fedora-meeting-2: F21 Alpha Readiness Meeting
==


Meeting started by jreznik at 19:01:15 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2014-09-04/f21-alpha-readiness-meeting.2014-09-04-19.01.log.html
.

Meeting summary
---
* Purpose of this meeting  (jreznik, 19:01:37)
  * Before each public release all of the groups participating the
development of Fedora's next release meet to make sure the release
is well coordinated.  (jreznik, 19:01:38)
  * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Release_Readiness_Meetings
(jreznik, 19:01:40)

* Roll Call  (jreznik, 19:01:53)
  * LINK: https://badges.fedoraproject.org/badge/readiness   (jreznik,
19:03:05)

* Current status  (jreznik, 19:05:34)

* Ambassadors  (jreznik, 19:10:26)
  * Ambassadors are ready for alpha. The media question can be solved
later.  (jreznik, 19:12:48)

* Design  (jreznik, 19:16:07)
  * Design is ready, alpha wallpaper done, supplemental wallpaper done,
alpha banner done  (jreznik, 19:17:16)

* Documentation  (jreznik, 19:19:15)

* FESCo  (jreznik, 19:21:11)
  * FESCo is ready to go  (jreznik, 19:22:21)

* Fedora Engineering Manager  (jreznik, 19:22:35)
  * No issues for Fedora Engineering Manager but mentions the need of
support in MirrorManager for ostree for final release  (jreznik,
19:25:46)
  * MirrorManager FAD is planned post-F21 - early December 2014
(jreznik, 19:27:36)

* Fedora Project Leader  (jreznik, 19:29:47)
  * FPL does not have anything particular  (jreznik, 19:31:10)

* Marketing  (jreznik, 19:32:50)
  * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/F21_Alpha_release_announcement
(jreznik, 19:33:50)
  * Marketing - alpha release announcement is about 60% done  (jreznik,
19:34:11)
  * Marketing team asks for if one person from each wg would write a
state of... for Fedora Magazine for Alpha  (jreznik, 19:41:45)

* Documentation  (jreznik, 19:45:03)
  * Documentation is in a good shape, changes, critpath stuff, etc, the
product specific things will need to be written out soon but for
Beta  (jreznik, 19:48:42)

* Infrastructure  (jreznik, 19:58:05)
  * Infrastructure - no particular problems pending  (jreznik, 20:00:48)

* Websites  (jreznik, 20:01:40)
  * Websites are mostly set, still need to figure out final paths of the
images we are shipping  (jreznik, 20:02:21)
  * doubts about Cloud and ARM  (jreznik, 20:02:39)
  * LINK: https://stg.fedoraproject.org/en/get-prerelease   (robyduck,
20:03:26)
  * For Final release, websites need much more feedback and informations
from the single Working Groups  (jreznik, 20:03:58)
  * LINK: https://stg.fedoraproject.org/en/get-prerelease#cloud   (jzb,
20:04:36)
  * if anybody wants to change the text content please update it asap,
we need to send changes out to L10n too  (jreznik, 20:08:00)

* QA  (jreznik, 20:14:11)
  * QA does not have anything specific, the netinst issue has been
brought up  (jreznik, 20:16:57)

* Release Engineering  (jreznik, 20:18:57)

* Open floor  (jreznik, 20:21:13)
  * ACTION: jreznik to invite formally WGs representatives for the next
meeting (Beta)  (jreznik, 20:24:22)
  * LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5891   (jreznik,
20:31:51)

Meeting ended at 20:35:02 UTC.




Action Items

* jreznik to invite formally WGs representatives for the next meeting
  (Beta)

Action Items, by person
---
* jreznik
  * jreznik to invite formally WGs representatives for the next meeting
(Beta)
* **UNASSIGNED**
  * (none)

People Present (lines said)
---
* jreznik (162)
* robyduck (51)
* jzb (43)
* sgallagh (40)
* adamw (39)
* stickster (36)
* randomuser (23)
* zodbot (16)
* mattdm (14)
* croberts (11)
* roshi (7)
* sesivany (6)
* nirik (6)
* jwb (5)
* gnokii (3)
* pjones (3)
* satellit (1)
* mailga (1)

- Original Message -
 Fedora 21 Alpha Release Readiness Meeting.
 
 date: 2014-09-04 place: irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-2
 time: 19:00 UTC (3 PM EDT, 12 PM PDT, 21:00 CEST)
 
 This Thursday, September 04, we will meet to make sure we are coordinated
 and ready for the Alpha release of Fedora 21 on Tuesday, September 09, 2014.
 Please note that this meeting will occur on September 04 even if the
 release is delayed at the Go/No-Go meeting on the same day two hours
 earlier.
 
 You may received this message several times, but I was asked to open this
 meeting to the teams and I'll also hope this will raise awareness and more
 team representatives will come to this meeting. This meeting works best
 when we have representatives from all of the teams.
 
 Jaroslav
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Proposing new dual booting release criteria

2014-09-04 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Mon, 2014-09-01 at 21:46 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
 I think the language you have is functional, it just needs a delimiter
 establishing our purview. Although, I'd suggest the size of the
 distribution doesn't matter, if we nerf someone's system because of
 something we're not doing correctly I think we should block on that.

So are we fine with the Windows and OS X criteria as originally
proposed? Adam, would these be better as beta blockers or as final
blockers?

The installer must be able to install into free space alongside an
existing clean Windows installation and install a bootloader which can
boot into both Windows and Fedora.

The installer must be able to install into free space alongside an
existing clean OS X installation and install a bootloader which can boot
into both OS X and Fedora, OR the installer must prominently warn the
user that he may be unable to boot OS X after installation, allowing the
user to cancel installation and reboot to OS X.

For the Linux criterion, how about this:

The installer must be able to install into free space alongside
existing GNU/Linux installations supported by the upstream software for
detecting previously-installed operating systems, and install a
bootloader which can boot into each previous installation.

The intent of this is that if upstream os-prober supports it and (a)
Fedora breaks it or (b) it's unexpectedly broken due to a regression (my
language here is kind of ambiguous; not sure if that's good or bad),
then that's a blocker. It also implicitly applies to cases where
multiple GNU/Linux systems are installed. We would then replace this
criterion in the future if BLS is adopted.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

[Test-Announce] Fedora 21 Alpha to slip by one week

2014-09-04 Thread Jaroslav Reznik
Today at Go/No-Go meeting it was decided to slip Fedora 21 Alpha release
by one week due to unresolved blocker bugs [1] and no release candidate 
available. More details in meeting minutes [2].

As a result, ALL MAJOR MILESTONES, and their dependent tasks, will be
pushed out by one week [3].

The next Go/No-Go meeting is on Thursday, Sep 11, the same time at
#fedora-meeting-2 channel.

[1] http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/milestone/21/alpha/buglist
[2] 
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2014-09-04/f21_alpha_gono-go_meeting.2014-09-04-17.01.html
[3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/21/Schedule
___
test-announce mailing list
test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

EE Xorg.bin xf86PlatformMatchDriver - Segmentation fault - Server aborting

2014-09-04 Thread poma

First of all, I welcome the revered readership.
Graciously invite you to help me figure out what's going on here.

With:
- xorg-x11-server-Xorg-1.16.0-5.fc22.x86_64
- xorg-x11-server-Xorg-1.16.0-6.fc22.x86_64
including:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/xorg-x11-server.git/commit/?id=5556cee
  ...
  # submitted http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/2014-June/042826.html
  # needed to allow X to start on arm and other devices without video on pci 
buses
  # There's a slight variant upstream but it doesn't build against 1.16.0 atm
  # rebase of Rob Clark's patches
  Patch10300: xorg-non-pci.patch
  ...
  %changelog
  ...
  * Mon Aug 25 2014 Peter Robinson pbrobin...@fedoraproject.org 1.16.0-5
  - re-add support for non pci platform devices
  ...
i.e.
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/xorg-x11-server.git/plain/xorg-non-pci.patch

this happens *with* *auto-detection* i.e. without xorg.conf[.d/*.conf] 
configuration files:

$ cat /var/log/Xorg.0.log
[29.277] 
X.Org X Server 1.16.0
Release Date: 2014-07-16
[29.277] X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0
[29.277] Build Operating System:  3.15.8-200.fc20.x86_64 
[29.277] Current Operating System: Linux rawhide642 
3.17.0-0.rc3.git0.1.fc22.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Sep 1 14:47:34 UTC 2014 x86_64
[29.277] Kernel command line: 
BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-3.17.0-0.rc3.git0.1.fc22.x86_64 
root=UUID=a07556d2-6fe2-417f-8202-c54c07fd9386 
drm_kms_helper.edid_firmware=HDMI-A-1:edid/1920x1080.bin 
drm_kms_helper.edid_firmware=DVI-I-1:edid/848x480.bin  
initrd=/initramfs-3.17.0-0.rc3.git0.1.fc22.x86_64.img
[29.278] Build Date: 26 August 2014  07:34:52PM
[29.278] Build ID: xorg-x11-server 1.16.0-5.fc22 
[29.278] Current version of pixman: 0.32.6
[29.278]Before reporting problems, check http://wiki.x.org
to make sure that you have the latest version.
[29.278] Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting,
(++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational,
(WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown.
[29.279] (==) Log file: /var/log/Xorg.0.log, Time: Thu Sep  4 23:22:47 
2014
[29.296] (==) Using system config directory /usr/share/X11/xorg.conf.d
[29.296] (==) No Layout section.  Using the first Screen section.
[29.296] (==) No screen section available. Using defaults.
[29.297] (**) |--Screen Default Screen Section (0)
[29.297] (**) |   |--Monitor default monitor
[29.297] (==) No monitor specified for screen Default Screen Section.
Using a default monitor configuration.
[29.297] (==) Automatically adding devices
[29.298] (==) Automatically enabling devices
[29.298] (==) Automatically adding GPU devices
[29.298] (==) FontPath set to:
catalogue:/etc/X11/fontpath.d,
built-ins
[29.298] (==) ModulePath set to /usr/lib64/xorg/modules
[29.298] (II) The server relies on udev to provide the list of input 
devices.
If no devices become available, reconfigure udev or disable 
AutoAddDevices.
[29.298] (II) Loader magic: 0x81de40
[29.298] (II) Module ABI versions:
[29.298]X.Org ANSI C Emulation: 0.4
[29.298]X.Org Video Driver: 18.0
[29.298]X.Org XInput driver : 21.0
[29.298]X.Org Server Extension : 8.0
[29.324] (EE) systemd-logind: failed to get session: PID 712 does not 
belong to any known session
[29.326] (II) xfree86: Adding drm device (/dev/dri/card1)
[29.328] (II) xfree86: Adding drm device (/dev/dri/card0)
[29.380] (--) PCI:*(0:1:0:0) 10de:087d:1849:087d rev 177, Mem @ 
0xfb00/16777216, 0xe000/268435456, 0xf600/33554432, I/O @ 
0xec00/128, BIOS @ 0x/131072
[29.383] (II) LoadModule: glx
[29.384] (II) Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/extensions/libglx.so
[29.421] (II) Module glx: vendor=X.Org Foundation
[29.430]compiled for 1.16.0, module version = 1.0.0
[29.430]ABI class: X.Org Server Extension, version 8.0
[29.430] (==) AIGLX enabled
[29.430] (EE) 
[29.430] (EE) Backtrace:
[29.432] (EE) 0: /usr/libexec/Xorg.bin (OsLookupColor+0x119) [0x59bea9]
[29.456] (EE) 1: /lib64/libc.so.6 (__restore_rt+0x0) [0x7fb5636ae98f]
[29.457] (EE) 2: /usr/libexec/Xorg.bin (xf86PlatformMatchDriver+0x253) 
[0x49a8b3]
[29.470] (EE) 3: /usr/libexec/Xorg.bin (config_fini+0x1bcd) [0x49f9fd]
[29.471] (EE) 4: /usr/libexec/Xorg.bin (config_fini+0x20be) [0x4a031e]
[29.472] (EE) 5: /usr/libexec/Xorg.bin (InitOutput+0xb56) [0x47bc06]
[29.499] (EE) 6: /usr/libexec/Xorg.bin (remove_fs_handlers+0x22a) [0x43cfca]
[29.526] (EE) 7: /lib64/libc.so.6 (__libc_start_main+0xf0) [0x7fb5636990e0]
[29.527] (EE) 8: /usr/libexec/Xorg.bin (_start+0x29) [0x42761e]
[29.551] (EE) 9: ? (?+0x29) [0x29]
[29.552] (EE) 
[29.552] (EE) Segmentation fault at address 0x0
[29.552] (EE) 
Fatal server error:
[29.552] (EE) Caught signal 11 (Segmentation fault). Server aborting
[29.552] (EE) 
[

Re: Is there a reason gnome documents wasn't part of the test day?

2014-09-04 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Wed, 2014-09-03 at 09:35 -0400, Adam Williamson wrote:
 I don't think there was a specific reason. The test day page basically
 gets copy/pasted from release to release, and it may just be that
 no-one
 thought to add notes/test cases for Documents. It's absolutely worth
 testing it and filing bugs - thanks very much for those!

I'm just going to drop a mail to the desktop list to get their attention
on these bugs. At the moment, switching to gnome-documents rather than
the traditional folder based organisation method is a disappointing
experience. :/
-- 
Thanks,
Warm regards,
Ankur (FranciscoD)

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha

Join Fedora! Come talk to us!
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Join_SIG



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: after update, suddenly gnome-screenshot won't start

2014-09-04 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Mon, 2014-09-01 at 21:04 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
 Can you file this downstream in bugzilla.redhat.com too? We should be
 able to propose this as an Alpha freeze exception and pull it in so
 that
 it gets included on the live media.

Apologies Kalev, I didn't see this mail earlier. Thanks for filing the
downstream bug.
-- 
Thanks,
Warm regards,
Ankur (FranciscoD)

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha

Join Fedora! Come talk to us!
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Join_SIG



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test