Re: F21 Installation Issues - Installation destination partitioning

2014-11-12 Thread Joerg Lechner
Hi,
I tried this procedure, with the same result as Bidski had described.
I had now a chat with Nvidia Support. They gave me a link:
http://nvidia.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/132/kw/how%20to%20install%20linux%20drivers
So far I don't know, if this is helpful, anyway I will read and try.
Kind regards

 

 

-Ursprüngliche Mitteilung- 
Von: Reynold reynoldli...@gmail.com
An: test test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Verschickt: Di, 11 Nov 2014 6:48 pm
Betreff: Re: F21 Installation Issues - Installation destination partitioning


How to manually install NVIDIA graphics driver

using yum or dnf (I prefer dnf so I will use that)

#dnf clean all
#dnf update
#dnf install gcc kernel-devel dkms

download NVIDIA driver from nvidia.com and cd to the download directory
#chmod +x NVIDIA-XXX.run (the NVIDIA driver, for instance 
NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-343.13.run)

#vi /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist.conf and insert a line with text 
blacklist nouveau (without quotes)
#vi /etc/sysconfig/grub and insert this text 
rd.driver.blacklist=nouveau (without quotes) and the end
of the line beginning with GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX= making sure the text is 
inside the last quotation mark

#grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg

#dnf remove xorg-x11-drv-nouveau.x86x_64 (this is 64bit driver - if you 
have a 32bit operating system it will be 32bit driver)

#reboot

When you are in grub and the and your operating system kernel is 
highlighted as the one you are booting to press the e on the keyboard 
to edit the line
Then at the end of this line GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT= still inside 
the ending quotes insert this text init 3 (without quotes)
press F10 to reboot

you should then come to a command prompt where you log on as a root user
cd to the download directory where the NVIDIA driver located
#./NVIDIA-XXX.run (for instance ./NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-343.13.run)
The NVIDIA installer will start
Accept the license agreement
Install 32 bit compatibility (if you are on a 64bit machine)
Choose to automatically update nvidia-xconfig-utility

reboot and log into graphical mode or from command line using root init 5

Hope this helps

Reynold

On 11/10/2014 11:49 PM, Bidski wrote:

 Hi,

 Can you instruct me in how you installed the nVidia drivers?


 - Original Message -
 From:
 Joerg Lechner julech...@aol.com

 To:
 bid...@iinet.net.au, test@lists.fedoraproject.org
 Cc:

 Sent:
 Tue, 11 Nov 2014 02:18:35 -0500
 Subject:
 Re: F21 Installation Issues - Installation destination partitioning


 Hi,
 on my laptop there is a Nvidia Geforce 840M (Acer Aspire E15, E5
 571G). I didn't have any problems with the grafics drivers so far.
 Currently running F21 Final TC1.
 Kind Regards



 -Ursprüngliche Mitteilung-
 Von: Bidski bid...@iinet.net.au
 An: test test@lists.fedoraproject.org
 Verschickt: Mo, 10 Nov 2014 10:05 pm
 Betreff: Re: F21 Installation Issues - Installation destination
 partitioning


 Has anyone had success installing the nVidia drivers in F21 yet?
 I am meeting some strange issues following the instructions for
 installing them in F20. Including this page
 (https://www.dropbox.com/s/9de7q9llhlamf32/IMG_20141110_192627.jpg?dl=0)
 displaying while booting after installing the drivers.

 I will generate some better diagnostics tonight.


 - Original Message -
 From:
 Adam Williamson adamw...@fedoraproject.org
 mailto:adamw...@fedoraproject.org

 To:
 Bidski bid...@iinet.net.au mailto:bid...@iinet.net.au,
 For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases
 test@lists.fedoraproject.org
 mailto:test@lists.fedoraproject.org
 Cc:

 Sent:
 Sun, 09 Nov 2014 23:38:19 -0800
 Subject:
 Re: F21 Installation Issues - Installation destination
 partitioning


 On Mon, 2014-11-10 at 18:28 +1100, Bidski wrote:
 
  After shifting the partitions on my HDD up by about 200 MiB
 and then
  using gdisk to convert the disk to GPT (did it this way to
 try and
  preserve the existing Windows partitions), the Fedora
 installer now
  only recognises my HDD as a multipath device.

  I also looked at the F21 Common Bugs page on the wiki. There
 is a
  section there talking about multipath device issue. I
 created edited
  the /etc/multipath.conf file to have the contents specified
 but the
  installer still treats all devices as multipaths.
 
  Any suggestions here?

 I wrote the CommonBugs note blind - I couldn't test that the
 proposed
 workaround would actually work as I haven't reproduced the bug.

 However, it shouldn't happen if you use a non-live install
 image, so I'd
 suggest that. You can use the 'Server' network install 

Re: Managing locked up desktops

2014-11-12 Thread Kamil Paral
 In relation to my video problems under 21 Beta
 
 is there ANY way to deal with the locked up desktop other
 than hitting the power switch? When it's locked-up, ctrl-alt-F
 keys don't work..ctrl-alt-del doesn't work...and the last resort
 alt-sysreq doesn't work. I am really afraid of totally messing up
 the FS to the point where I am forced to remain in Debian.

Please note that sysrq is disabled by default in Fedora.
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

F-21 Branched report: 20141112 changes

2014-11-12 Thread Fedora Branched Report
Compose started at Wed Nov 12 07:15:03 UTC 2014
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[audtty]
audtty-0.1.12-9.fc20.armv7hl requires libaudclient.so.2
[authhub]
authhub-0.1.2-3.fc19.armv7hl requires libjson.so.0
[avro]
avro-mapred-1.7.5-9.fc21.noarch requires hadoop-mapreduce
avro-mapred-1.7.5-9.fc21.noarch requires hadoop-client
[blender]
1:blender-2.72b-1.fc21.armv7hl requires 
libOpenCOLLADAStreamWriter.so.0.1
1:blender-2.72b-1.fc21.armv7hl requires 
libOpenCOLLADASaxFrameworkLoader.so.0.1
1:blender-2.72b-1.fc21.armv7hl requires libOpenCOLLADAFramework.so.0.1
1:blender-2.72b-1.fc21.armv7hl requires libOpenCOLLADABaseUtils.so.0.1
1:blender-2.72b-1.fc21.armv7hl requires libMathMLSolver.so.0.1
1:blender-2.72b-1.fc21.armv7hl requires libGeneratedSaxParser.so.0.1
1:blenderplayer-2.72b-1.fc21.armv7hl requires 
libOpenCOLLADAStreamWriter.so.0.1
1:blenderplayer-2.72b-1.fc21.armv7hl requires 
libOpenCOLLADASaxFrameworkLoader.so.0.1
1:blenderplayer-2.72b-1.fc21.armv7hl requires 
libOpenCOLLADAFramework.so.0.1
1:blenderplayer-2.72b-1.fc21.armv7hl requires 
libOpenCOLLADABaseUtils.so.0.1
1:blenderplayer-2.72b-1.fc21.armv7hl requires libMathMLSolver.so.0.1
1:blenderplayer-2.72b-1.fc21.armv7hl requires 
libGeneratedSaxParser.so.0.1
[deltacloud-core]
deltacloud-core-rackspace-1.1.3-1.fc20.noarch requires 
rubygem(cloudservers)
deltacloud-core-rackspace-1.1.3-1.fc20.noarch requires 
rubygem(cloudfiles)
[django-recaptcha]
django-recaptcha-0.1-7.20091212svn6.fc21.noarch requires python-django14
[dragonegg]
dragonegg-3.4-0.3.rc0.fc21.armv7hl requires gcc = 0:4.8.2-14.fc21
[edelib]
edelib-2.1-5.fc21.armv7hl requires libedelib.so
edelib-devel-2.1-5.fc21.armv7hl requires libedelib.so
[fatrat]
1:fatrat-1.2.0-0.21.beta2.fc21.armv7hl requires 
libtorrent-rasterbar.so.7
[flush]
flush-0.9.12-10.fc21.armv7hl requires libtorrent-rasterbar.so.7
[gdesklet-SlideShow]
gdesklet-SlideShow-0.9-16.fc21.noarch requires gdesklets
[gdesklets-citation]
gdesklets-citation-2.0-3.20120702git355e2ee.fc19.noarch requires 
gdesklets
[gedit-valencia]
gedit-valencia-0.4.0-1.20131223git94442bf.fc21.armv7hl requires 
libvala-0.24.so.0
[gofer]
ruby-gofer-0.77.1-2.fc21.noarch requires rubygem(qpid) = 0:0.16.0
[gorm]
gorm-1.2.18-5.fc20.armv7hl requires libgnustep-gui.so.0.23
[juffed]
juffed-plugin-terminal-0.10-10.fc21.armv7hl requires libqtermwidget.so.0
[leiningen]
leiningen-1.7.1-7.fc20.noarch requires maven-ant-tasks
leiningen-1.7.1-7.fc20.noarch requires classworlds
[libghemical]
libghemical-2.99.1-24.fc20.armv7hl requires libf77blas.so.3
libghemical-2.99.1-24.fc20.armv7hl requires libatlas.so.3
[libopensync-plugin-irmc]
1:libopensync-plugin-irmc-0.22-7.fc20.armv7hl requires libopenobex.so.1
[ltsp]
ltsp-client-5.4.5-8.fc21.armv7hl requires fuse-unionfs
ltsp-server-5.4.5-8.fc21.armv7hl requires cdialog
[meshmagick]
meshmagick-0.6.0-20.svn2898.fc21.armv7hl requires libOgreMain.so.1.8.1
meshmagick-libs-0.6.0-20.svn2898.fc21.armv7hl requires 
libOgreMain.so.1.8.1
[monodevelop-vala]
monodevelop-vala-2.8.8.1-6.fc21.armv7hl requires vala  0:0.25.0
[netdisco]
netdisco-1.1-7.fc21.noarch requires perl(SNMP::Info::Layer2::Bay)
[ocaml-pa-do]
ocaml-pa-do-0.8.16-3.fc21.armv7hl requires ocaml(Camlp4) = 
0:ebd368022fd2bc7b305a42902efa4c90
[openslides]
openslides-1.3.1-3.fc21.noarch requires python-django  0:1.5
[openstack-nova]
openstack-nova-compute-2014.1.2-1.fc21.noarch requires 
libvirt-daemon-xen
[openvas-client]
openvas-client-3.0.3-8.fc20.armv7hl requires libopenvas_omp.so.6
openvas-client-3.0.3-8.fc20.armv7hl requires libopenvas_nasl.so.6
openvas-client-3.0.3-8.fc20.armv7hl requires libopenvas_misc.so.6
openvas-client-3.0.3-8.fc20.armv7hl requires libopenvas_hg.so.6
openvas-client-3.0.3-8.fc20.armv7hl requires libopenvas_base.so.6
[php-pecl-sphinx]
php-pecl-sphinx-1.3.2-1.fc21.armv7hl requires libsphinxclient-0.0.1.so
[pootle]
pootle-2.1.6-8.fc21.noarch requires python-django14
[python-askbot-fedmsg]
python-askbot-fedmsg-0.1.0-2.fc21.noarch requires askbot
[python-coffin]
python-coffin-0.3.7-3.fc21.noarch requires python-django14
[python-django-addons]
python-django-addons-0.6.6-2.fc21.noarch requires python-django14
[python-django-longerusername]
python-django-longerusername-0.4-5.20130204gite4e85d7d.fc21.noarch 
requires python-django14
[rubygem-linecache19]
rubygem-linecache19-0.5.13-6.fc20.armv7hl requires libruby.so.2.0
[rubygem-rubigen]
rubygem-rubigen-1.5.8-3.fc21.noarch requires rubygem(activesupport)  
0:3.2.0
[rubygem-ruby-debug-base19]

rawhide report: 20141112 changes

2014-11-12 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
Compose started at Wed Nov 12 05:15:02 UTC 2014
Broken deps for i386
--
[3Depict]
3Depict-0.0.16-3.fc22.i686 requires libmgl.so.7.2.0
[Sprog]
Sprog-0.14-27.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.0)
[audtty]
audtty-0.1.12-9.fc20.i686 requires libaudclient.so.2
[authhub]
authhub-0.1.2-3.fc19.i686 requires libjson.so.0
[cab]
cab-0.1.9-12.fc22.i686 requires cabal-dev
[clementine]
clementine-1.2.3-1.fc22.i686 requires libcdio.so.15(CDIO_15)
clementine-1.2.3-1.fc22.i686 requires libcdio.so.15
[condor]
condor-plumage-8.1.4-7.a1a7df5.fc22.i686 requires libmongoclient.so
[deltacloud-core]
deltacloud-core-rackspace-1.1.3-1.fc20.noarch requires 
rubygem(cloudservers)
deltacloud-core-rackspace-1.1.3-1.fc20.noarch requires 
rubygem(cloudfiles)
[django-recaptcha]
django-recaptcha-0.1-7.20091212svn6.fc21.noarch requires python-django14
[dnssec-check]
dnssec-check-1.14.0.1-4.fc20.i686 requires libval-threads.so.14
dnssec-check-1.14.0.1-4.fc20.i686 requires libsres.so.14
[dragonegg]
dragonegg-3.4-0.3.rc0.fc21.i686 requires libLLVM-3.4.so
dragonegg-3.4-0.3.rc0.fc21.i686 requires gcc = 0:4.8.2-14.fc21
[edelib]
edelib-2.1-5.fc22.i686 requires libedelib.so
edelib-devel-2.1-5.fc22.i686 requires libedelib.so
[fatrat]
1:fatrat-1.2.0-0.21.beta2.fc22.i686 requires libtorrent-rasterbar.so.7
[flush]
flush-0.9.12-10.fc22.i686 requires libtorrent-rasterbar.so.7
[gdesklet-SlideShow]
gdesklet-SlideShow-0.9-16.fc21.noarch requires gdesklets
[gdesklets-citation]
gdesklets-citation-2.0-3.20120702git355e2ee.fc19.noarch requires 
gdesklets
[gedit-valencia]
gedit-valencia-0.4.0-1.20131223git94442bf.fc21.i686 requires 
libvala-0.24.so.0
[ghc-hjsmin]
ghc-hjsmin-0.1.4.7-3.fc22.i686 requires 
libHSoptparse-applicative-0.9.0-ghc7.6.3.so
[glances]
glances-2.1.2-2.fc22.noarch requires python-psutil = 0:2.0.0
[gofer]
ruby-gofer-0.77.1-2.fc21.noarch requires rubygem(qpid) = 0:0.16.0
[iwhd]
iwhd-1.6-11.fc22.i686 requires libmongoclient.so
[juffed]
juffed-plugin-terminal-0.10-10.fc22.i686 requires libqtermwidget.so.0
[kdegraphics]
7:kdegraphics-4.14.3-1.fc22.noarch requires gwenview = 0:4.14.3
[kmid2]
kmid2-2.4.0-7.fc22.i686 requires libdrumstick-file.so.0
kmid2-2.4.0-7.fc22.i686 requires libdrumstick-alsa.so.0
[leiningen]
leiningen-1.7.1-7.fc20.noarch requires maven-ant-tasks
leiningen-1.7.1-7.fc20.noarch requires classworlds
[libghemical]
libghemical-2.99.1-24.fc20.i686 requires libf77blas.so.3
libghemical-2.99.1-24.fc20.i686 requires libatlas.so.3
[libopensync-plugin-irmc]
1:libopensync-plugin-irmc-0.22-7.fc20.i686 requires libopenobex.so.1
[ltsp]
ltsp-client-5.4.5-8.fc21.i686 requires fuse-unionfs
ltsp-server-5.4.5-8.fc21.i686 requires cdialog
[meshmagick]
meshmagick-0.6.0-20.svn2898.fc21.i686 requires libOgreMain.so.1.8.1
meshmagick-libs-0.6.0-20.svn2898.fc21.i686 requires libOgreMain.so.1.8.1
[monodevelop-vala]
monodevelop-vala-2.8.8.1-6.fc21.i686 requires vala  0:0.25.0
[netdisco]
netdisco-1.1-7.fc21.noarch requires perl(SNMP::Info::Layer2::Bay)
[nwchem]
nwchem-openmpi-6.3.2-11.fc21.i686 requires libmpi_usempi.so.1
[openslides]
openslides-1.3.1-3.fc21.noarch requires python-django  0:1.5
[openvas-client]
openvas-client-3.0.3-8.fc20.i686 requires libopenvas_omp.so.6
openvas-client-3.0.3-8.fc20.i686 requires libopenvas_nasl.so.6
openvas-client-3.0.3-8.fc20.i686 requires libopenvas_misc.so.6
openvas-client-3.0.3-8.fc20.i686 requires libopenvas_hg.so.6
openvas-client-3.0.3-8.fc20.i686 requires libopenvas_base.so.6
[pootle]
pootle-2.1.6-8.fc21.noarch requires python-django14
[python-askbot-fedmsg]
python-askbot-fedmsg-0.1.0-2.fc21.noarch requires askbot
[python-coffin]
python-coffin-0.3.7-3.fc21.noarch requires python-django14
[python-django-addons]
python-django-addons-0.6.6-2.fc21.noarch requires python-django14
[python-django-longerusername]
python-django-longerusername-0.4-5.20130204gite4e85d7d.fc21.noarch 
requires python-django14
[python-selenium]
python3-selenium-2.43.0-1.fc22.noarch requires python3-rdflib
[rubygem-linecache19]
rubygem-linecache19-0.5.13-6.fc20.i686 requires libruby.so.2.0
[rubygem-rubigen]
rubygem-rubigen-1.5.8-3.fc21.noarch requires rubygem(activesupport)  
0:3.2.0
[rubygem-ruby-debug-base19]
rubygem-ruby-debug-base19-0.11.26-6.fc20.i686 requires libruby.so.2.0
[shogun]
shogun-doc-3.2.0.1-0.27.git20140804.96f3cf3.fc22.noarch requires 
shogun-data = 0:0.8.1-0.18.git20140804.48a1abb.fc22
[sugar-tamtam]
sugar-tamtam-common-0-0.14.20100201git.fc22.i686 requires 
libcsound.so.5.2
[techne]

Re: Error: fedora-release-cloud conflicts with fedora-release-nonproduct-21-0.16.noarch

2014-11-12 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2014-11-11 at 13:00 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
  Error: fedora-release-cloud conflicts with 
  fedora-release-nonproduct-21-0.16.noarch
 
 
 Worse than I thought.
 
 # rpm -e fedora-release-cloud
 error: Failed dependencies:
   system-release-product is needed by (installed) 
 fedora-release-21-0.16.noarch
 # repoquery --whatprovides system-release-product
 generic-release-workstation-0:21-7.noarch
 fedora-release-server-0:21-0.16.noarch
 fedora-release-nonproduct-0:21-0.16.noarch
 fedora-release-workstation-0:21-0.16.noarch
 fedora-release-server-0:21-0.16.noarch
 fedora-release-cloud-0:21-0.16.noarch
 generic-release-cloud-0:21-7.noarch
 fedora-release-nonproduct-0:21-0.16.noarch
 generic-release-server-0:21-7.noarch
 generic-release-nonproduct-0:21-7.noarch
 fedora-release-cloud-0:21-0.16.noarch
 generic-release-workstation-0:21-7.noarch
 generic-release-server-0:21-7.noarch
 generic-release-nonproduct-0:21-7.noarch
 fedora-release-workstation-0:21-0.16.noarch
 generic-release-cloud-0:21-7.noarch
 
 
 Seems to me at some time a random generic dependency has been pulled in
 and now causes problems. 

Er, no? You have no generic package installed. All you're seeing is:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F21_bugs#environment-product-conflicts

it's a known issue, and somewhat tricky to do anything about.

 If memory serves correctly, this is a workstation
 install of Fedora 20,

There's no such thing - there were no Products for F20. 'yum update'ing
F20 to F21 tends to pull in fedora-release-cloud because it wins the
race to provide system-release-product. 'fedup' requires you to
explicitly choose a Product, avoiding that issue.

  upgraded to Fedora 21 (on Aug 14th).
 
 # rpm -e fedora-release-cloud --nodeps
 [...]
 # yum -y install fedora-release-workstation
 [...]
 --- Package fedora-release-workstation.noarch 0:21-0.16 will be installed
 [...]
 Error: firewalld-config-standard conflicts with 
 fedora-release-workstation-21-0.16.noarch
 
 Mad.

There's nothing really 'mad' about it, all the deps are sane (the point
is to use different default firewall configurations with different
Products), it's just a bit tricky to switch between products which pull
in deps. You can use yum shell to do it, though - set up a transaction
which removes one Product package and its associated deps and installs
the ones you want instead.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Resume still broken on Thinkpad X1 Carbon

2014-11-12 Thread valent.turko...@gmail.com
Please all of you with resume issues state if you are or are not using
luksCrypt to encrypt your drives. There is a chance that this is
systemd and luksCrypt issue.
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

2014-11-12 @ 1600 UTC ** Blocker Review Meeting Minutes

2014-11-12 Thread Mike Ruckman
==
#fedora-blocker-review: F21-blocker-review
==

Meeting started by roshi at 16:03:53 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2014-11-12/f21-blocker-review.2014-11-12-16.03.log.html
.

Meeting summary
---
* Roll Call  (roshi, 16:03:53)

* (1161779) System fails to boot with rootfs on iSCSI - missing kernel
  parameters  (roshi, 16:07:30)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1161779   (roshi,
16:07:33)
  * Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW  (roshi, 16:07:36)
* AGREED: - 1161779 - AcceptedBlocker - This is a clear violation of
the Final criteria: The installer must be able to detect (if
possible) and install to supported network-attached storage
devices.  (roshi, 16:14:04)

* (1162215) LV resize does not check filesystem minimum size  (roshi,
  16:14:09)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162215   (roshi,
16:14:09)
  * Proposed Blocker, anaconda, ASSIGNED  (roshi, 16:14:10)
* AGREED: - 11662215 - AcceptedBlocker - This bug is a clear 
violation
of the Final criterion: Any installer mechanism for resizing
storage volumes must correctly attempt the requested operation.
(roshi, 16:25:09)

* (1158442) Gnome-initial-setup window doesn't fit to visible with small
  resolution  (roshi, 16:25:59)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1158442   (roshi,
16:26:02)
  * Proposed Blocker, gnome-initial-setup, MODIFIED  (roshi, 16:26:05)
* AGREED: - 1158442 - Punt - We're going to wait to decide on this
pending discussion and testing of an existing fix.  (roshi,
16:37:26)

* (986731) Dual boot of uefi Windows 7 and Fedora 19 fails to boot
  Windows  (roshi, 16:37:41)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986731   (roshi,
16:37:45)
  * Proposed Blocker, grub2, NEW  (roshi, 16:37:47)
* AGREED: - 986731 - RejectedBlocker - This doesn't seem to be
reproducible on F21. If it is, please update the bug and 
reproduce.
(roshi, 16:42:24)

* (1103496) Installer interface sometimes freezes for a while (but
  install continues, and screen eventually unfreezes)  (roshi, 16:42:27)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103496   (roshi,
16:42:30)
  * Proposed Blocker, gtk3, NEW  (roshi, 16:42:33)
* LINK:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Final_Release_Criteria#Data_corruption
(kparal, 16:58:43)
  * AGREED: - 1103496 - AcceptedBlocker - This is a 
conditional
  violation of the Final Data Corruption criterion 
since it creates
  the opportunity of data loss to the user (by 
making them think the
  install has hung and the user restarts the 
machine mid-install).
  (roshi, 17:02:22)

* (1144613) [abrt] gnome-tweak-tool: gtk_tree_row_ref_deleted():
  python2.7 killed by SIGSEGV  (roshi, 17:02:37)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1144613   (roshi,
17:02:40)
  * Proposed Blocker, gtk3, NEW  (roshi, 17:02:43)
* AGREED: - 1144613 - RejectedBlocker - The GNOME tweak tool is not 
a
default application for the Workstation product, so this is not
considered a blocker.  (roshi, 17:10:09)

* (1147670) keyboard layout chooser switches letters while typing
  (roshi, 17:10:18)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1147670   (roshi,
17:10:21)
  * Proposed Blocker, gtk3, NEW  (roshi, 17:10:24)
* AGREED: - 1147670 - RejectedBlocker AcceptedFreezeException - This
bug is difficult to reproduce and it seems to be very
system-dependant.  Accepting as an FE because if you do hit 
it, it
would be pretty obnoxious. Repropose if more solid 
reproduction
steps can be found or there is a concrete system on 
which it is
quite difficult to perform Fedora installation. 
 (roshi, 17:43:49)

* (1158968) AttributeError: 'DMRaidArrayDevice' object has no attribute
  'formatClass'  (roshi, 17:44:00)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1158968   (roshi,
17:44:03)
  * Proposed Blocker, python-blivet, MODIFIED  (roshi, 17:44:05)
* AGREED: - 1158968 - AcceptedBlocker - This bug is a violation of 
the
Beta Criterion: The installer must be able to detect and 
install to
hardware or firmware RAID storage devices.  (roshi, 17:56:13)

* (1130794) Missing high contrast icon  (roshi, 17:56:21)
  * 

Re: Error: fedora-release-cloud conflicts with fedora-release-nonproduct-21-0.16.noarch

2014-11-12 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Wed, 12 Nov 2014 05:51:39 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:


  fedora-release-workstation-0:21-0.16.noarch
  generic-release-cloud-0:21-7.noarch
  
  
  Seems to me at some time a random generic dependency has been pulled in
  and now causes problems. 
 
 Er, no? You have no generic package installed.

# rpm -q --whatrequires fedora-release-cloud
no package requires fedora-release-cloud

# rpm --test -e fedora-release-cloud
error: Failed dependencies:
system-release-product is needed by (installed) 
fedora-release-21-0.16.noarch

As one can see, it's some virtual package or capability, but not a direct
or strict dependency on fedora-release-cloud.

Even the fedora-release-nonproduct package provides system-release-product.

 There's nothing really 'mad' about it, all the deps are sane

Certainly not.

 (the point
 is to use different default firewall configurations with different
 Products),

That makes no sense.

  # rpm -qR fedora-release-cloud|grep -v ^rpm
  fedora-release = 21-0.16

Whether known or not, at least it is confirmed as a bug. I could also
have called it insane, because XFCE should not conflict with the GNOME
desktop because of a fedora-release-cloud package that does not even
specify any strict dependencies.
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Resume still broken on Thinkpad X1 Carbon

2014-11-12 Thread poma
On 12.11.2014 19:21, valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
 Please all of you with resume issues state if you are or are not using
 luksCrypt to encrypt your drives. There is a chance that this is
 systemd and luksCrypt issue.
 

Hilarious.


-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Resume still broken on Thinkpad X1 Carbon

2014-11-12 Thread poma

https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/usb/power-management.txt
https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/power/states.txt
https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/power/basic-pm-debugging.txt
https://01.org/linuxgraphics/documentation/how-debug-suspend-resume-issues-0
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/Reference/S3
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/Reference/S4

After reading all this with understanding, 
and after testing it with each of these steps, 
with different kernel versions that are available to you here
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=8
if you are unable to build your own kernel, 
then we can continue the discussion.


-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Error: fedora-release-cloud conflicts with fedora-release-nonproduct-21-0.16.noarch

2014-11-12 Thread Bodhi Zazen
You can fix this with 

yum swap -- remove firewalld-config-standard fedora-release-cloud -- install 
firewalld-config-workstation fedora-release-workstation

swap workstation for non-product if you wish ;)

IMHO it would be nice if it were easier / more straightforward to swap between 
releases, although I could see that the list of packages that make up the 
various releases may become divergent.

FWIW I upgraded a few weeks ago and I do not recall an option to select cloud 
vs workstation vs non-product , although as this is pre-release it may have 
been resolved.

- Original Message -
From: Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com
To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 11:29:22 AM
Subject: Re: Error: fedora-release-cloud conflicts with 
fedora-release-nonproduct-21-0.16.noarch

On Wed, 12 Nov 2014 05:51:39 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:


  fedora-release-workstation-0:21-0.16.noarch
  generic-release-cloud-0:21-7.noarch
  
  
  Seems to me at some time a random generic dependency has been pulled in
  and now causes problems. 
 
 Er, no? You have no generic package installed.

# rpm -q --whatrequires fedora-release-cloud
no package requires fedora-release-cloud

# rpm --test -e fedora-release-cloud
error: Failed dependencies:
system-release-product is needed by (installed) 
fedora-release-21-0.16.noarch

As one can see, it's some virtual package or capability, but not a direct
or strict dependency on fedora-release-cloud.

Even the fedora-release-nonproduct package provides system-release-product.

 There's nothing really 'mad' about it, all the deps are sane

Certainly not.

 (the point
 is to use different default firewall configurations with different
 Products),

That makes no sense.

  # rpm -qR fedora-release-cloud|grep -v ^rpm
  fedora-release = 21-0.16

Whether known or not, at least it is confirmed as a bug. I could also
have called it insane, because XFCE should not conflict with the GNOME
desktop because of a fedora-release-cloud package that does not even
specify any strict dependencies.
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: 2014-11-12 @ 1600 UTC ** Blocker Review Meeting Minutes

2014-11-12 Thread Sérgio Basto
Hi, 

I'd like add https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1088619 
as blocker to release 21 . Please read last comments #95 still #101 


On Qua, 2014-11-12 at 11:26 -0700, Mike Ruckman wrote: 
 ==
 #fedora-blocker-review: F21-blocker-review
 ==
 
 Meeting started by roshi at 16:03:53 UTC. The full logs are available at
 http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2014-11-12/f21-blocker-review.2014-11-12-16.03.log.html
 .
 
 Meeting summary
 ---
 * Roll Call  (roshi, 16:03:53)
 
 * (1161779) System fails to boot with rootfs on iSCSI - missing kernel
   parameters  (roshi, 16:07:30)
 * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1161779   (roshi,
 16:07:33)
 * Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW  (roshi, 16:07:36)
   * AGREED: - 1161779 - AcceptedBlocker - This is a clear violation of
   the Final criteria: The installer must be able to detect (if
 possible) and install to supported network-attached storage
 devices.  (roshi, 16:14:04)
 
 * (1162215) LV resize does not check filesystem minimum size  (roshi,
   16:14:09)
 * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162215   (roshi,
 16:14:09)
 * Proposed Blocker, anaconda, ASSIGNED  (roshi, 16:14:10)
   * AGREED: - 11662215 - AcceptedBlocker - This bug is a clear 
 violation
   of the Final criterion: Any installer mechanism for resizing
 storage volumes must correctly attempt the requested operation.
 (roshi, 16:25:09)
 
 * (1158442) Gnome-initial-setup window doesn't fit to visible with small
   resolution  (roshi, 16:25:59)
 * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1158442   (roshi,
 16:26:02)
 * Proposed Blocker, gnome-initial-setup, MODIFIED  (roshi, 16:26:05)
   * AGREED: - 1158442 - Punt - We're going to wait to decide on this
   pending discussion and testing of an existing fix.  (roshi,
   16:37:26)
 
 * (986731) Dual boot of uefi Windows 7 and Fedora 19 fails to boot
   Windows  (roshi, 16:37:41)
 * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986731   (roshi,
 16:37:45)
 * Proposed Blocker, grub2, NEW  (roshi, 16:37:47)
   * AGREED: - 986731 - RejectedBlocker - This doesn't seem to be
   reproducible on F21. If it is, please update the bug and 
 reproduce.
   (roshi, 16:42:24)
 
 * (1103496) Installer interface sometimes freezes for a while (but
   install continues, and screen eventually unfreezes)  (roshi, 16:42:27)
 * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103496   (roshi,
 16:42:30)
 * Proposed Blocker, gtk3, NEW  (roshi, 16:42:33)
   * LINK:
   
 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Final_Release_Criteria#Data_corruption
   (kparal, 16:58:43)
 * AGREED: - 1103496 - AcceptedBlocker - This is a 
 conditional
 violation of the Final Data Corruption criterion 
 since it creates
 the opportunity of data loss to the user (by 
 making them think the
 install has hung and the user restarts the 
 machine mid-install).
 (roshi, 17:02:22)
 
 * (1144613) [abrt] gnome-tweak-tool: gtk_tree_row_ref_deleted():
   python2.7 killed by SIGSEGV  (roshi, 17:02:37)
 * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1144613   (roshi,
 17:02:40)
 * Proposed Blocker, gtk3, NEW  (roshi, 17:02:43)
   * AGREED: - 1144613 - RejectedBlocker - The GNOME tweak tool is not 
 a
   default application for the Workstation product, so this is not
   considered a blocker.  (roshi, 17:10:09)
 
 * (1147670) keyboard layout chooser switches letters while typing
   (roshi, 17:10:18)
 * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1147670   (roshi,
 17:10:21)
 * Proposed Blocker, gtk3, NEW  (roshi, 17:10:24)
   * AGREED: - 1147670 - RejectedBlocker AcceptedFreezeException - This
   bug is difficult to reproduce and it seems to be very
   system-dependant.  Accepting as an FE because if you do hit 
 it, it
   would be pretty obnoxious. Repropose if more solid 
 reproduction
   steps can be found or there is a concrete system on 
 which it is
   quite difficult to perform Fedora installation. 
  (roshi, 17:43:49)
 
 * (1158968) AttributeError: 'DMRaidArrayDevice' object has no attribute
   'formatClass'  (roshi, 17:44:00)
 * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1158968   (roshi,
 17:44:03)
 * Proposed Blocker, python-blivet, MODIFIED  (roshi, 17:44:05)
   * AGREED: - 1158968 - AcceptedBlocker - This bug is a 

Re: Error: fedora-release-cloud conflicts with fedora-release-nonproduct-21-0.16.noarch

2014-11-12 Thread Adrian
Is there a particular url link available for the new yum with command 
formats  options available please ?


Adrian Fewster


On 13/11/14 08:57, Bodhi Zazen wrote:

You can fix this with

yum swap -- remove firewalld-config-standard fedora-release-cloud -- install 
firewalld-config-workstation fedora-release-workstation

swap workstation for non-product if you wish ;)

IMHO it would be nice if it were easier / more straightforward to swap between 
releases, although I could see that the list of packages that make up the 
various releases may become divergent.

FWIW I upgraded a few weeks ago and I do not recall an option to select cloud 
vs workstation vs non-product , although as this is pre-release it may have 
been resolved.




--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Error: fedora-release-cloud conflicts with fedora-release-nonproduct-21-0.16.noarch

2014-11-12 Thread Bodhi Zazen
Adrian - I got the information from man yum and a little trial and error

- Original Message -
From: Adrian vk4...@bigpond.com
To: For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases 
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 4:06:29 PM
Subject: Re: Error: fedora-release-cloud conflicts with 
fedora-release-nonproduct-21-0.16.noarch

Is there a particular url link available for the new yum with command 
formats  options available please ?

Adrian Fewster


On 13/11/14 08:57, Bodhi Zazen wrote:
 You can fix this with

 yum swap -- remove firewalld-config-standard fedora-release-cloud -- install 
 firewalld-config-workstation fedora-release-workstation

 swap workstation for non-product if you wish ;)

 IMHO it would be nice if it were easier / more straightforward to swap 
 between releases, although I could see that the list of packages that make up 
 the various releases may become divergent.

 FWIW I upgraded a few weeks ago and I do not recall an option to select cloud 
 vs workstation vs non-product , although as this is pre-release it may have 
 been resolved.



-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
-- 
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: F21 Installation Issues - Installation destination partitioning

2014-11-12 Thread Joerg Lechner

 Hi,
I am in discussion with Nvidia Support, to get known, why I can not install the 
Nvidia Grafics Driver.
Mike from Nvidia Support asked me the following:

I reviewed your lspci -nn output and I  see two VGA devices below:

00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Intel Corporation Haswell-ULT 
Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:0a16] (rev 0b) 
03:00.0 3D controller [0302]: NVIDIA Corporation GM108M [GeForce 840M] 
[10de:1341] (rev a2)

This means that your laptop is an Optimus laptop.

Please let me know if you can disable Optimus or disable the onboard Intel 
graphics card.  
 
---
I let You know, when there is a solution to install the Nvidia driver 
correctly, but
if the Optimus Laptop is the reason, this could be interesting for all 
others, not being able,
to install the Nvidia grafics driver.
Kind Regards

 

-Ursprüngliche Mitteilung- 
Von: Reynold reynoldli...@gmail.com
An: test test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Verschickt: Di, 11 Nov 2014 6:48 pm
Betreff: Re: F21 Installation Issues - Installation destination partitioning


How to manually install NVIDIA graphics driver

using yum or dnf (I prefer dnf so I will use that)

#dnf clean all
#dnf update
#dnf install gcc kernel-devel dkms

download NVIDIA driver from nvidia.com and cd to the download directory
#chmod +x NVIDIA-XXX.run (the NVIDIA driver, for instance 
NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-343.13.run)

#vi /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist.conf and insert a line with text 
blacklist nouveau (without quotes)
#vi /etc/sysconfig/grub and insert this text 
rd.driver.blacklist=nouveau (without quotes) and the end
of the line beginning with GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX= making sure the text is 
inside the last quotation mark

#grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg

#dnf remove xorg-x11-drv-nouveau.x86x_64 (this is 64bit driver - if you 
have a 32bit operating system it will be 32bit driver)

#reboot

When you are in grub and the and your operating system kernel is 
highlighted as the one you are booting to press the e on the keyboard 
to edit the line
Then at the end of this line GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT= still inside 
the ending quotes insert this text init 3 (without quotes)
press F10 to reboot

you should then come to a command prompt where you log on as a root user
cd to the download directory where the NVIDIA driver located
#./NVIDIA-XXX.run (for instance ./NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-343.13.run)
The NVIDIA installer will start
Accept the license agreement
Install 32 bit compatibility (if you are on a 64bit machine)
Choose to automatically update nvidia-xconfig-utility

reboot and log into graphical mode or from command line using root init 5

Hope this helps

Reynold

On 11/10/2014 11:49 PM, Bidski wrote:

 Hi,

 Can you instruct me in how you installed the nVidia drivers?


 - Original Message -
 From:
 Joerg Lechner julech...@aol.com

 To:
 bid...@iinet.net.au, test@lists.fedoraproject.org
 Cc:

 Sent:
 Tue, 11 Nov 2014 02:18:35 -0500
 Subject:
 Re: F21 Installation Issues - Installation destination partitioning


 Hi,
 on my laptop there is a Nvidia Geforce 840M (Acer Aspire E15, E5
 571G). I didn't have any problems with the grafics drivers so far.
 Currently running F21 Final TC1.
 Kind Regards



 -Ursprüngliche Mitteilung-
 Von: Bidski bid...@iinet.net.au
 An: test test@lists.fedoraproject.org
 Verschickt: Mo, 10 Nov 2014 10:05 pm
 Betreff: Re: F21 Installation Issues - Installation destination
 partitioning


 Has anyone had success installing the nVidia drivers in F21 yet?
 I am meeting some strange issues following the instructions for
 installing them in F20. Including this page
 (https://www.dropbox.com/s/9de7q9llhlamf32/IMG_20141110_192627.jpg?dl=0)
 displaying while booting after installing the drivers.

 I will generate some better diagnostics tonight.


 - Original Message -
 From:
 Adam Williamson adamw...@fedoraproject.org
 mailto:adamw...@fedoraproject.org

 To:
 Bidski bid...@iinet.net.au mailto:bid...@iinet.net.au,
 For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases
 test@lists.fedoraproject.org
 mailto:test@lists.fedoraproject.org
 Cc:

 Sent:
 Sun, 09 Nov 2014 23:38:19 -0800
 Subject:
 Re: F21 Installation Issues - Installation destination
 partitioning


 On Mon, 2014-11-10 at 18:28 +1100, Bidski wrote:
 
  After shifting the partitions on my HDD up by about 200 MiB
 and then
  using gdisk to convert the disk to GPT (did it this way to
 try and