Fedora 21 updates-testing report
The following Fedora 21 Security updates need testing: Age URL 105 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-16833/asterisk-11.14.2-1.fc21 97 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-17139/aeskulap-0.2.2-0.20beta1.fc21,orthanc-0.8.5-2.fc21,dcmtk-3.6.1-1.fc21 81 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-0264/gcab-0.4-7.fc21 73 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-0620/chicken-4.9.0.1-3.fc21 57 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-1467/openstack-glance-2014.1.3-4.fc21 50 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-1803/fcgi-2.4.0-26.fc21 42 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-2055/openldap-2.4.40-3.fc21 30 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-2584/echoping-6.1-0.beta.r434svn.1.fc21 29 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-2729/qpid-cpp-0.30-12.fc21 28 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-2849/drupal7-entity-1.6-1.fc21 23 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-3218/xterm-308-3.fc21 19 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-3505/389-ds-base-1.3.3.9-1.fc21 16 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-3569/icu-52.1-5.fc21 15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-3612/ImageMagick-6.8.8.10-6.fc21 10 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4079/varnish-4.0.3-3.fc21 9 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4143/powerpc-utils-python-1.2.1-7.fc21 8 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4284/drupal7-ctools-1.7-1.fc21 8 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4340/drupal7-7.35-1.fc21 7 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4372/drupal6-6.35-1.fc21 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4725/tor-0.2.5.11-1.fc21 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4575/python-dulwich-0.10.0-1.fc21 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4684/glpi-0.84.8-4.fc21 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4482/osc-0.151.1-163.2.1.fc21 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4724/moodle-2.7.7-1.fc21 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4742/qtwebkit-2.3.4-6.fc21 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4564/mingw-qt5-qtbase-5.4.1-1.fc21,mingw-qt5-qtdeclarative-5.4.1-1.fc21,mingw-qt5-qtgraphicaleffects-5.4.1-1.fc21,mingw-qt5-qtimageformats-5.4.1-1.fc21,mingw-qt5-qtlocation-5.4.1-1.fc21,mingw-qt5-qtmultimedia-5.4.1-1.fc21,mingw-qt5-qtquick1-5.4.1-1.fc21,mingw-qt5-qtscript-5.4.1-1.fc21,mingw-qt5-qtsensors-5.4.1-1.fc21,mingw-qt5-qtsvg-5.4.1-1.fc21,mingw-qt5-qttools-5.4.1-1.fc21,mingw-qt5-qttranslations-5.4.1-1.fc21,mingw-qt5-qtwebkit-5.4.1-1.fc21,mingw-qt5-qtwinextras-5.4.1-1.fc21 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4573/drupal7-webform-4.6-1.fc21 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4666/rt-4.2.10-2.fc21 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4689/quassel-0.11.0-2.fc21 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4711/ca-certificates-2015.2.3-1.0.fc21 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4716/qt5-qtwebkit-5.4.1-4.fc21 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4658/libxml2-2.9.1-7.fc21 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4596/rest-0.7.93-1.fc21 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4699/libzip-0.11.2-5.fc21 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4565/mingw-libzip-0.11.2-3.fc21 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4642/PyYAML-3.11-7.fc21 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4476/owncloud-7.0.5-2.fc21 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4838/setroubleshoot-3.2.22-1.fc21 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4939/tcpdump-4.7.3-1.fc21 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4807/lasso-2.4.1-1.fc21 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4879/seamonkey-2.33.1-1.fc21 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4872/texlive-2014-3.1.20140525_r34255.fc21 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4747/freeipa-4.1.4-1.fc21,slapi-nis-0.54.2-1.fc21 The following Fedora 21 Critical Path updates have yet to be approved: Age URL 10 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4096/krb5-1.12.2-15.fc21 10 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4044/gvfs-1.22.4-1.fc21 8 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4288/perl-Carp-1.36-1.fc21 8 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4238/libgsf-1.14.29-6.fc21 8 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4273/vte291-0.38.3-1.fc21 8 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4263/libgweather-3.14.3-1.fc21 7 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/upda
Fedora 20 updates-testing report
The following Fedora 20 Security updates need testing: Age URL 117 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-15988/fail2ban-0.9.1-1.fc20 105 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-16845/resteasy-3.0.6-3.fc20 105 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-16825/asterisk-11.14.2-1.fc20 97 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-17089/aeskulap-0.2.2-0.20beta1.fc20,orthanc-0.8.5-2.fc20,dcmtk-3.6.1-1.fc20 73 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-0633/chicken-4.9.0.1-3.fc20 52 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-1648/lcms-1.19-13.fc20 51 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-1718/389-admin-1.1.38-1.fc20 50 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-1790/fcgi-2.4.0-26.fc20 34 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-0951/xdg-utils-1.1.0-0.38.rc3.fc20 30 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-2600/echoping-6.1-0.beta.r434svn.1.fc20 28 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-2826/drupal7-entity-1.6-1.fc20 23 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-3201/xterm-297-2.fc20 19 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-1165/patch-2.7.5-1.fc20 19 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-3417/389-ds-base-1.3.2.27-1.fc20 15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-3738/ImageMagick-6.8.6.3-6.fc20 9 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4201/powerpc-utils-python-1.2.1-7.fc20 8 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4280/drupal7-ctools-1.7-1.fc20 8 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4216/php-5.5.23-1.fc20 8 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4315/drupal7-7.35-1.fc20 8 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4332/texlive-2013-6.20131226_r32488.fc20 7 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4394/drupal6-6.35-1.fc20 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4478/tor-0.2.5.11-1.fc20 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4516/glpi-0.84.8-4.fc20 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4530/moodle-2.6.10-1.fc20 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4486/ca-certificates-2015.2.3-1.0.fc20 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4508/drupal7-webform-4.6-1.fc20 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4534/python-dulwich-0.10.0-1.fc20 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4587/qt5-qtwebkit-5.4.1-4.fc20 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4549/osc-0.151.1-163.2.1.fc20 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4551/qtwebkit-2.3.4-6.fc20 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4672/quassel-0.11.0-2.fc20 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4703/mingw-qt5-qtbase-5.4.1-1.fc20,mingw-qt5-qtdeclarative-5.4.1-1.fc20,mingw-qt5-qtgraphicaleffects-5.4.1-1.fc20,mingw-qt5-qtimageformats-5.4.1-1.fc20,mingw-qt5-qtlocation-5.4.1-1.fc20,mingw-qt5-qtmultimedia-5.4.1-1.fc20,mingw-qt5-qtquick1-5.4.1-1.fc20,mingw-qt5-qtscript-5.4.1-1.fc20,mingw-qt5-qtsensors-5.4.1-1.fc20,mingw-qt5-qtsvg-5.4.1-1.fc20,mingw-qt5-qttools-5.4.1-1.fc20,mingw-qt5-qttranslations-5.4.1-1.fc20,mingw-qt5-qtwebkit-5.4.1-1.fc20,mingw-qt5-qtwinextras-5.4.1-1.fc20 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4554/rest-0.7.93-1.fc20 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4556/libzip-0.11.2-5.fc20 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4719/libxml2-2.9.1-4.fc20 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4669/mingw-libzip-0.11.2-3.fc20 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4693/owncloud-7.0.5-2.fc20 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4477/PyYAML-3.10-11.fc20 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4953/tcpdump-4.5.1-4.fc20 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4848/lasso-2.4.1-1.fc20 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4833/setroubleshoot-3.2.17-2.fc20 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4961/seamonkey-2.33.1-1.fc20 The following Fedora 20 Critical Path updates have yet to be approved: Age URL 34 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-0951/xdg-utils-1.1.0-0.38.rc3.fc20 10 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4077/krb5-1.11.5-19.fc20 9 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4138/webkitgtk3-2.2.8-3.fc20 7 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4384/gdisk-1.0.0-1.fc20 7 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4380/crda-1.1.3_2015.03.13-1.fc20 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4486/ca-certificates-2015.2.3-1.0.fc20 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4551/qtwebkit-2.3.4-6.fc20 2 https://admin.fedoraproje
Re: QA:Testcase_desktop_updates (notifications) failure on KDE
> Giulio 'juliuxpigface' wrote: > > > Hi guys, > > > > I've just reported the bug > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206760 encountered while I > > was testing the behavior of a freshly-installed Beta-TC5 with KDE. As > > you surely know, this is described by part of > > "QA:Testcase_desktop_updates" and is one of the cases listed under > > "Release-blocking desktops: x86 / x86_64". > > > > What am I exactly supposed to do now? Should I propose it as a "blocker" > > or "freeze exception"? > > Yes, it's a blocker, but hopefully it won't come to that (the proposed > updater replacement just got stable autokarma in -testing). > > -- Rex > Hi Rex, thank you for your answers (both here and on bugzilla). I apologize for the questions, but as I keep saying I'm new and I'm still learning. 1) Is there anything further I should do with the bug-report? Are other steps required or it's ok as it is now? 2) Then; sorry but I didn't understand... Should I mark the failure as a blocker, even though the bug it's now solved? Kind regards. // Giulio (juliuxpigface) -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: F22: nautilus will not allow desktop icons if using session type "Gnome on Wayland"
On 28/03/15 01:40 AM, Joachim Backes wrote: > Hi drago01, > > If I login on my F22 box to a gnome on wayland session, no nautilus is > running (maybe it crashed when loggin in), so no menu appears (for > example for "Open terminal") if clicking the right mouse button. So I > can't confirm that nautilus is running well :-( > > If the trying to start nemo, then nemo dumps core: > Glib: ERROR:ghash.c:373:g_hash_table_lookup_node: assertion failed: > (hash_table->ref_count >0) > Aborted (core dumped) > > Kind regards > > Joachim Backes Running Nautilus well on Gnome on Wayland. Test done of ASUS X550ZE laptop. -- Luya Tshimbalanga Graphic & Web Designer E: l...@fedoraproject.org W: http://www.coolest-storm.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Yum SIGSEGV
Hi, I have a workstation and three laptops running Fedora Rawhide. I did my daily update just now (I point to the Kent mirror rather than the Fedora mirrors so as to ensure all machines see the same repository, it updates mid-afternoon +00:00). Workstation and two laptops upgraded fine. One laptop is having troubles with the packages: gdm.x86_641:3.16.0.1-2.fc23 rawhide openmpi.x86_641.8.4-6.20150324gitg9ad2aa8.fc23 rawhide openmpi-devel.x86_64 1.8.4-6.20150324gitg9ad2aa8.fc23 rawhide trying to install them causes yum to fail: … Total size: 9.0 M Is this ok [y/d/N]: y Downloading packages: Running transaction check Running transaction test Segmentation fault (core dumped) though I am, not sure where the core is dumped to, it isn't . It happens if I do gdm individually, the other two enforce each other so come as a pair, and they have the same problem. I have no idea how to work out what is going wrong here so as to fix it, this is clearly a fault on the one laptop. Any help tracking this down would be most welcome… -- Russel. = Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel.win...@ekiga.net 41 Buckmaster Roadm: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: rus...@winder.org.uk London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: QA:Testcase_desktop_updates (notifications) failure on KDE
Giulio 'juliuxpigface' wrote: > Hi guys, > > I've just reported the bug > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206760 encountered while I > was testing the behavior of a freshly-installed Beta-TC5 with KDE. As > you surely know, this is described by part of > "QA:Testcase_desktop_updates" and is one of the cases listed under > "Release-blocking desktops: x86 / x86_64". > > What am I exactly supposed to do now? Should I propose it as a "blocker" > or "freeze exception"? Yes, it's a blocker, but hopefully it won't come to that (the proposed updater replacement just got stable autokarma in -testing). -- Rex -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: dbus-x11 should be added as a dependency for gnome-terminal in rawhide
On Fri, 27 Mar 2015 14:49:19 -0700 Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2015-03-27 at 19:04 +0200, Rares Aioanei wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm installing a minimalistic Fluxbox VM with Rawhide and after > > installing > > gnome-terminal I can't launch it because it can't find dbus-launch, > > which > > is to be found in the package dbus-x11. So I guess it should be > > added as a > > dep. > > Can you file a bug on the gnome-terminal package? Thanks! https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206770 Please let me know if there's anything else I can do to help. -- Rares Aioanei -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
QA:Testcase_desktop_updates (notifications) failure on KDE
Hi guys, I've just reported the bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206760 encountered while I was testing the behavior of a freshly-installed Beta-TC5 with KDE. As you surely know, this is described by part of "QA:Testcase_desktop_updates" and is one of the cases listed under "Release-blocking desktops: x86 / x86_64". What am I exactly supposed to do now? Should I propose it as a "blocker" or "freeze exception"? Anyway, more testing (especially from experienced users) is obviously welcome! Thank you in advance. Kind regards. // Giulio (juliuxpigface) -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: F22: nautilus will not allow desktop icons if using session type "Gnome on Wayland"
On 03/28/2015 09:14 AM, drago01 wrote: On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 8:12 AM, Joachim Backes wrote: On 03/28/2015 08:07 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Sat, 2015-03-28 at 07:34 +0100, Joachim Backes wrote: Changed my session type to "Gnome on Wayland". After relogging in, I see no more desktop icons. Killing nautilus and starting in a gnome-terminal, I see the following message: ** (nautilus:4636): Warning **: Desktop icons only supported on X11. Desktop not created. Will this mean that nautilus will not run completely on Gnome/Wayland? Well, I mean, it means what it says. It can't display icons on Wayland. I'm not sure what else you're asking? Is this a bug or a feature? Additionally, will this mean that nautilus will be never running under wayland? Nautilus runs just fine under wayland. It does not support drawing the desktop yet though. Hi drago01, If I login on my F22 box to a gnome on wayland session, no nautilus is running (maybe it crashed when loggin in), so no menu appears (for example for "Open terminal") if clicking the right mouse button. So I can't confirm that nautilus is running well :-( If the trying to start nemo, then nemo dumps core: Glib: ERROR:ghash.c:373:g_hash_table_lookup_node: assertion failed: (hash_table->ref_count >0) Aborted (core dumped) Kind regards Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 22 (Twenty Two) Kernel-4.0.0-0.rc5.git4.1.fc22.x86_64 Joachim Backes https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: F22: nautilus will not allow desktop icons if using session type "Gnome on Wayland"
Hi Joachim, I think it's not a bug, the warning is clear enough. I'd say that this feature is not ready yet, but the developers are aware of it and know it's missing. The message is like a placeholder that warns users, but it's not a real error/exception. But hey, this is just my opinion and experienced users may know something I don't :)... Regards // Giulio (juliuxpigface) > On 03/28/2015 08:07 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Sat, 2015-03-28 at 07:34 +0100, Joachim Backes wrote: > >> Changed my session type to "Gnome on Wayland". After relogging in, I > >> see > >> no more desktop icons. Killing nautilus and starting in a > >> gnome-terminal, I see the following message: > >> > >> > >> ** (nautilus:4636): Warning **: Desktop icons only supported on X11. > >> Desktop not created. > >> > >> Will this mean that nautilus will not run completely on > >> Gnome/Wayland? > > > > Well, I mean, it means what it says. It can't display icons on > > Wayland. I'm not sure what else you're asking? > > > > Is this a bug or a feature? Additionally, will this mean that nautilus > will be never running under wayland? > > Joachim Backes > > -- > > Fedora release 22 (Twenty Two) > Kernel-4.0.0-0.rc5.git4.1.fc22.x86_64 > > > Joachim Backes > https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: F22: nautilus will not allow desktop icons if using session type "Gnome on Wayland"
On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 8:12 AM, Joachim Backes wrote: > On 03/28/2015 08:07 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: >> >> On Sat, 2015-03-28 at 07:34 +0100, Joachim Backes wrote: >>> >>> Changed my session type to "Gnome on Wayland". After relogging in, I >>> see >>> no more desktop icons. Killing nautilus and starting in a >>> gnome-terminal, I see the following message: >>> >>> >>> ** (nautilus:4636): Warning **: Desktop icons only supported on X11. >>> Desktop not created. >>> >>> Will this mean that nautilus will not run completely on >>> Gnome/Wayland? >> >> >> Well, I mean, it means what it says. It can't display icons on >> Wayland. I'm not sure what else you're asking? >> > > Is this a bug or a feature? Additionally, will this mean that nautilus will > be never running under wayland? Nautilus runs just fine under wayland. It does not support drawing the desktop yet though. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: F22: nautilus will not allow desktop icons if using session type "Gnome on Wayland"
On 03/28/2015 08:07 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Sat, 2015-03-28 at 07:34 +0100, Joachim Backes wrote: Changed my session type to "Gnome on Wayland". After relogging in, I see no more desktop icons. Killing nautilus and starting in a gnome-terminal, I see the following message: ** (nautilus:4636): Warning **: Desktop icons only supported on X11. Desktop not created. Will this mean that nautilus will not run completely on Gnome/Wayland? Well, I mean, it means what it says. It can't display icons on Wayland. I'm not sure what else you're asking? Is this a bug or a feature? Additionally, will this mean that nautilus will be never running under wayland? Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 22 (Twenty Two) Kernel-4.0.0-0.rc5.git4.1.fc22.x86_64 Joachim Backes https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: F22: nautilus will not allow desktop icons if using session type "Gnome on Wayland"
On Sat, 2015-03-28 at 07:34 +0100, Joachim Backes wrote: > Changed my session type to "Gnome on Wayland". After relogging in, I > see > no more desktop icons. Killing nautilus and starting in a > gnome-terminal, I see the following message: > > > ** (nautilus:4636): Warning **: Desktop icons only supported on X11. > Desktop not created. > > Will this mean that nautilus will not run completely on > Gnome/Wayland? Well, I mean, it means what it says. It can't display icons on Wayland. I'm not sure what else you're asking? -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
