Re: [Testing Needed] rolekit-0.3.0-1.fc22
On Thu, 2015-03-26 at 14:24 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rolekit-0.3.0-1.fc22
>
> Defying even my own expectations, we've released rolekit 0.3.0 today
> with full multiple-instancing support. I'd really like for this to
> end
> up in the Fedora 22 Beta which freezes on Tuesday morning, so if
> anyone who is willing can please download the Fedora 22 Server TC5
> that will be available in a few hours, update to rolekit-0.3.0 and
> try
> it out, that would be a big help.
>
> Some things to test:
>
> == Database Server Role ==
> * Install the first instance from a mostly pristine Server install.
> * Install additional instance
> * Install some instances with the default owner, others with a
> custom
> one.
> * Decommission them in random order.
> * Ensure that they can be reached over TCP/IP sockets
>
> == Domain Controller Role ==
> No obvious regressions. This is unlikely, since we didn't touch the
> Domain Controller role code and made only minor tweaks to the common
> code.
Just to clarify, you can create DB Role instances as follows:
* Create a file something.json with the following contents:
{
"database": "a_database_name",
"owner": "an_optional_name",
"password": "an_optional_owner_password"
}
Then install with:
$ rolectl deploy --settings-file=something.json databaseserver"
See rolekit.roles.databaseserver(5) for all possible options for the
JSON file and how they work.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
2015-03-30 @ 1600 UTC ** Blocker Review Minutes
== #fedora-blocker-review: F22-blocker-review == Meeting started by roshi at 16:04:24 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2015-03-30/f22-blocker-review.2015-03-30-16.04.log.html . Meeting summary --- * Roll Call (roshi, 16:04:24) * Introduction (roshi, 16:07:59) * Our purpose in this meeting is to review proposed blocker and nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept them, and to monitor the progress of fixing existing accepted blocker and nice-to-have bugs. (roshi, 16:07:59) * We'll be following the process outlined at: (roshi, 16:08:03) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting (roshi, 16:08:05) * The bugs up for review today are available at: (roshi, 16:08:08) * LINK: http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current (roshi, 16:08:10) * The criteria for release blocking bugs can be found at: (roshi, 16:08:13) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_22_Alpha_Release_Criteria (roshi, 16:08:16) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_22_Beta_Release_Criteria (roshi, 16:08:18) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_22_Final_Release_Criteria (roshi, 16:08:22) * (1206760) KDE desktop doesn't notify for available updates (roshi, 16:08:32) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206760 (roshi, 16:08:33) * Proposed Blocker, apper, VERIFIED (roshi, 16:08:33) * AGREED: - 1206760 - AcceptedBlocker Beta - This bug is a clear violation of the beta criterion: "Release-blocking desktops must notify the user of available updates, but must not do so when running as a live image." (roshi, 16:11:54) * (1206420) docker missing from 22 Beta TC5 x86_64 trees (roshi, 16:13:03) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206420 (roshi, 16:13:03) * Proposed Blocker, distribution, ON_QA (roshi, 16:13:04) * AGREED: - 1206420 - AcceptedBlocker Beta - This bug is a clear violation of the following criterion: "When installing with a release-blocking dedicated installer image, the installer must be able to install the default package set." (roshi, 16:16:46) * (1207251) Fedup fail to decrypt disk (roshi, 16:16:56) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1207251 (roshi, 16:16:57) * Proposed Blocker, fedup, NEW (roshi, 16:16:57) * AGREED: - 1207251 - AcceptedBlocker Beta - This bug is a clear violation of the following beta criterion: "For each one of the release-blocking package sets, it must be possible to successfully complete an upgrade from a fully updated installation of the previous stable Fedora release with that package set installed" (roshi, 16:19:55) * (1206404) Crash on transition from g-i-s to GNOME on 'basic graphics' install (nomodeset) (roshi, 16:20:09) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206404 (roshi, 16:20:12) * Proposed Blocker, gdm, NEW (roshi, 16:20:14) * AGREED: - 1206404 - RejectedBlocker AcceptedFreezeException Beta - This bug doesn't quite violate the criterion (gdm/g-i-s runs, and a user gets created) and appears to be only reproducible with a specific setup. If this is found to be more widespread, please repropose. (roshi, 16:30:50) * (1205534) gnome-initial-setup crashes upon selecting language (roshi, 16:31:08) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205534 (roshi, 16:31:11) * Proposed Blocker, gnome-initial-setup, NEW (roshi, 16:31:13) * AGREED: - 1105534 - Punt - We need more information about this bug before we can determine it's blocker status. (roshi, 16:35:48) * (864198) grubby fatal error updating grub.cfg when /boot is btrfs (roshi, 16:36:02) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864198 (roshi, 16:36:05) * Proposed Blocker, grubby, ASSIGNED (roshi, 16:36:08) * AGREED: - 864198 - AcceptedBlocker Beta - This bug is a clear violation of the criterion: "The installed system must be able to download and install updates with the default console package manager." when /boot is on btrfs. (roshi, 16:45:17) * (1206394) Error: g-bd-md-error-quark: Failed to parse mdexamine data (0) (roshi, 16:45:36) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206394 (roshi, 16:45:39) * Proposed Blocker, libblockdev, MODIFIED (roshi, 16:45:41) * AGREED: - 1206394 - AcceptedBlocker Beta - This bug is a clear violation of the beta RAID criterion: "The installer must be able to detect and install to hardware or firmware RAID storage devices" (roshi, 16:49:49) * (1200901) invisible mouse cursor in wayland login-screen when in VM (roshi, 16:50:14) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1200901 (roshi, 16:50:17) * Proposed Blocker, gdm, NEW (roshi, 16:50:19)
Re: F22: nautilus will not allow desktop icons if using session type "Gnome on Wayland"
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 12:04:31PM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > What we do plan wrt. to the nautilus desktop window is to move it to a > separate process, so that the nautilus application can stop carrying > this ballast. For whatever it's worth, this seems great to me, as someone who doesn't use the desktop-icon stuff. -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: F22: nautilus will not allow desktop icons if using session type "Gnome on Wayland"
On Sat, 2015-03-28 at 09:14 +0100, Giulio 'juliuxpigface' wrote: > Hi Joachim, > > I think it's not a bug, the warning is clear enough. I'd say that > this > feature is not ready yet, but the developers are aware of it and know > it's missing. The message is like a placeholder that warns users, but > it's not a real error/exception. > > But hey, this is just my opinion and experienced users may know > something I don't :)... I would leave out the "yet" here. Nautilus, the application, works just fine under Wayland. Nautilus, the former desktop component, does not and we don't have high-priority plans to change that. The classic session will continue to use X for now. What we do plan wrt. to the nautilus desktop window is to move it to a separate process, so that the nautilus application can stop carrying this ballast. > > Regards > > // Giulio (juliuxpigface) > > > > On 03/28/2015 08:07 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > On Sat, 2015-03-28 at 07:34 +0100, Joachim Backes wrote: > > > > Changed my session type to "Gnome on Wayland". After relogging > > > > in, I > > > > see > > > > no more desktop icons. Killing nautilus and starting in a > > > > gnome-terminal, I see the following message: > > > > > > > > > > > > ** (nautilus:4636): Warning **: Desktop icons only supported > > > > on X11. > > > > Desktop not created. > > > > > > > > Will this mean that nautilus will not run completely on > > > > Gnome/Wayland? > > > > > > Well, I mean, it means what it says. It can't display icons on > > > Wayland. I'm not sure what else you're asking? > > > > > > > Is this a bug or a feature? Additionally, will this mean that > > nautilus > > will be never running under wayland? > > > > Joachim Backes > > > > -- > > > > Fedora release 22 (Twenty Two) > > Kernel-4.0.0-0.rc5.git4.1.fc22.x86_64 > > > > > > Joachim Backes > > https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes > > -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Yum SIGSEGV
On Sun, 2015-03-29 at 23:53 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > […] > That being said, it's hard to tell much from just 'it segfaulted' - > an > abrt report would be better, if we can get one? Is there a way of forcing one to be triggered to get the data needed: [root@lionors ~]# yum reinstall gdm Loaded plugins: langpacks Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package gdm.x86_64 1:3.16.0.1-2.fc23 will be reinstalled --> Finished Dependency Resolution --> Finding unneeded leftover dependencies Found and removing 0 unneeded dependencies Dependencies Resolved == Package ArchVersion Repository Size == Reinstalling: gdm x86_64 1:3.16.0.1-2.fc23rawhide 738 k Transaction Summary == Reinstall 1 Package Total download size: 738 k Installed size: 3.3 M Is this ok [y/d/N]: y Downloading packages: gdm-3.16.0.1-2.fc23.x86_64.rpm | 738 kB 00:00:00 Running transaction check Running transaction test Segmentation fault (core dumped) -- Russel. = Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel.win...@ekiga.net 41 Buckmaster Roadm: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: rus...@winder.org.uk London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Yum SIGSEGV
Hi, Perhaps it's not the same issue, but here some RPMs fail to install with either dnf or yum (running rawhide up-to-date i686). If I try to install the rpm file from /var/cache with rpm -ivh I also get a return status of 139. If I use more -v's I don't get anything, it just stops at "D: computing 326 file fingerprints". The rpm file I tried this with is fluxbox (it has all deps installed). On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 3:08 PM, Russel Winder wrote: > On Sun, 2015-03-29 at 17:31 -0500, Dan Mossor wrote: > > > […] > > Rawhide should be using DNF exclusively. Please try again using dnf > > and > > let us know the results from that. > > > Downloading Packages: > (1/2): openmpi-1.8.4-5.20150228gitgd83fb30.fc23 747 kB/s | 395 kB 00:00 > (2/2): openmpi-devel-1.8.4-5.20150228gitgd83fb3 1.0 MB/s | 610 kB 00:00 > openmpi-1.8.4-6.20150324gitg9ad2aa8.fc23.x86_64: Checksum of the > delta-rebuilt RPM failed > openmpi-devel-1.8.4-6.20150324gitg9ad2aa8.fc23.x86_64: Checksum of the > delta-rebuilt RPM failed > (1/2): openmpi-1.8.4-6.20150324gitg9ad2aa8.fc23 1.5 MB/s | 3.0 MB 00:01 > (2/2): openmpi-devel-1.8.4-6.20150324gitg9ad2aa 1.5 MB/s | 5.3 MB 00:03 > > > Total 1.3 MB/s | 9.3 MB 00:07 > Delta RPMs reduced 8.3 MB of updates to 9.3 MB (-11.1% saved) > Running transaction check > Transaction check succeeded. > Running transaction test > Segmentation fault (core dumped) > > -- > Russel. > > = > Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: > sip:russel.win...@ekiga.net > 41 Buckmaster Roadm: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: rus...@winder.org.uk > London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder > > -- > test mailing list > test@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test > -- Rares Aioanei -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Yum SIGSEGV
On Sun, 2015-03-29 at 17:31 -0500, Dan Mossor wrote: > […] > Rawhide should be using DNF exclusively. Please try again using dnf > and > let us know the results from that. Downloading Packages: (1/2): openmpi-1.8.4-5.20150228gitgd83fb30.fc23 747 kB/s | 395 kB 00:00 (2/2): openmpi-devel-1.8.4-5.20150228gitgd83fb3 1.0 MB/s | 610 kB 00:00 openmpi-1.8.4-6.20150324gitg9ad2aa8.fc23.x86_64: Checksum of the delta-rebuilt RPM failed openmpi-devel-1.8.4-6.20150324gitg9ad2aa8.fc23.x86_64: Checksum of the delta-rebuilt RPM failed (1/2): openmpi-1.8.4-6.20150324gitg9ad2aa8.fc23 1.5 MB/s | 3.0 MB 00:01 (2/2): openmpi-devel-1.8.4-6.20150324gitg9ad2aa 1.5 MB/s | 5.3 MB 00:03 Total 1.3 MB/s | 9.3 MB 00:07 Delta RPMs reduced 8.3 MB of updates to 9.3 MB (-11.1% saved) Running transaction check Transaction check succeeded. Running transaction test Segmentation fault (core dumped) -- Russel. = Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel.win...@ekiga.net 41 Buckmaster Roadm: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: rus...@winder.org.uk London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Yum SIGSEGV
On Sun, 2015-03-29 at 23:53 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Sun, 2015-03-29 at 17:31 -0500, Dan Mossor wrote: > > > > Rawhide should be using DNF exclusively. Please try again using > > dnf > > and > > let us know the results from that. OK, I will investigate switching. > Not really. yum is still present and expected to be used, no-one's > expecting the world to stop using yum overnight. If segfaults are > happening, it's a problem. > > That being said, it's hard to tell much from just 'it segfaulted' - > an > abrt report would be better, if we can get one? I "yum clean all", switched to using the repository pool, and got the new version of gdm installed. So I am not in a position to replicate it and get an abrt report. There is something wrong with the GDM installation though as although the screen appears any attempt to login just causes the greeter screen to reshow :-( The openmpi packages still do not install but at least the Kent mirror is not reporting that although the package and metadata is in the repository, the post processed, installable RPM does not match the expected one and so installation aborts. Using one of the virtual terminals or an SSH login I get: Downloading packages: Finishing delta rebuilds of 2 package(s) (8.3 M) Some delta RPMs failed to download or rebuild. Retrying../s | 8.3 MB 00:00 ETA openmpi-devel-1.8.4-6.20150324 FAILED http://www.mirrorservice.org/sites/dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/x86_64/os/Packages/o/openmpi-devel-1.8.4-6.20150324gitg9ad2aa8.fc23.x86_64.rpm: [Errno -1] Package does not match intended download. Suggestion: run yum --enablerepo=rawhide clean metadata and try again Trying other mirror. openmpi-1.8.4-6.20150324gitg9a FAILED http://www.mirrorservice.org/sites/dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/x86_64/os/Packages/o/openmpi-1.8.4-6.20150324gitg9ad2aa8.fc23.x86_64.rpm: [Errno -1] Package does not match intended download. Suggestion: run yum --enablerepo=rawhide clean metadata and try again Trying other mirror. Error downloading packages: openmpi-1.8.4-6.20150324gitg9ad2aa8.fc23.x86_64: [Errno 256] No more mirrors to try. openmpi-devel-1.8.4-6.20150324gitg9ad2aa8.fc23.x86_64: [Errno 256] No more mirrors to try. -- Russel. = Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel.win...@ekiga.net 41 Buckmaster Roadm: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: rus...@winder.org.uk London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Fedora 22 updates-testing report
The following Fedora 22 Security updates need testing: Age URL 31 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-2638/echoping-6.1-0.1.beta.r434svn.fc22 30 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-2783/drupal7-entity-1.6-1.fc22 20 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-3368/389-ds-base-1.3.3.9-1.fc22 10 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4212/powerpc-utils-python-1.2.1-7.fc22 9 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4312/drupal7-ctools-1.7-1.fc22 3 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4613/moodle-2.8.5-1.fc22 3 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4727/qt5-qtwebkit-5.4.1-4.fc22 3 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4531/quassel-0.11.0-2.fc22 3 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4639/python-dulwich-0.10.0-1.fc22 3 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4685/qtwebkit-2.3.4-6.fc22 3 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4726/opensaml-java-xmltooling-1.3.4-9.fc22,jboss-connector-1.6-api-1.0.1-1.fc22,cxf-xjc-utils-2.6.2-1.fc22,cxf-build-utils-2.6.0-1.fc22,cxf-2.7.11-1.fc22 3 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4504/python-django-1.8-0.7.c1.fc22 3 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4553/libzip-0.11.2-5.fc22 3 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4559/mingw-libzip-0.11.2-3.fc22 1 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4839/kernel-4.0.0-0.rc5.git1.3.fc22 1 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4821/lasso-2.4.1-3.fc22 1 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4804/tcpdump-4.7.3-1.fc22 1 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4791/seamonkey-2.33.1-1.fc22 1 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4788/freeipa-4.1.4-1.fc22,slapi-nis-0.54.2-1.fc22 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-5022/drupal7-webform-4.7-1.fc22 The following Fedora 22 Critical Path updates have yet to be approved: Age URL 13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-3994/perl-DBD-MySQL-4.031-1.fc22 9 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4309/perl-Glib-1.310-1.fc22 9 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4239/perl-Carp-1.36-1.fc22 9 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4217/perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.068-2.fc22 8 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4388/livecd-tools-22.1-1.fc22 1 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4773/bluez-5.29-1.fc22 1 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4839/kernel-4.0.0-0.rc5.git1.3.fc22 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-5045/xfce4-session-4.12.1-2.fc22 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4971/PackageKit-1.0.5-2.fc22 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4969/lorax-22.8-1.fc22 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora 22 updates-testing PackageKit-1.0.5-2.fc22 byobu-5.92-1.fc22 cadvisor-0.6.2-0.3.git89088df.fc22 cura-lulzbot-14.12-2.fc22 drupal7-webform-4.7-1.fc22 edgar-1.20-1.fc22 eric-6.0.3-1.fc22 fedora-dockerfiles-0-0.14.gitbd5429f.fc22 gperftools-2.4-1.fc22 kdocker-4.9-1.fc22 kernel-4.0.0-0.rc5.git4.1.fc22 libdigidoc-3.10.0-2.fc22 libdigidocpp-3.10.0-1.fc22 libguestfs-1.29.32-1.fc22 libwebp-0.4.3-2.fc22 lis-1.5.52-1.fc22 lorax-22.8-1.fc22 mingw-crt-4.0.1-1.fc22 mingw-headers-4.0.1-1.fc22 mingw-winpthreads-4.0.1-1.fc22 mingw-winstorecompat-4.0.1-1.fc22 nodejs-chai-2.2.0-1.fc22 nordugrid-arc-5.0.0-2.fc22 nordugrid-arc-doc-2.0.0-1.fc22 opendkim-2.10.1-7.fc22 opendmarc-1.3.1-7.fc22 openvswitch-2.3.1-3.git20150327.fc22 perl-Dancer2-0.159003-1.fc22 perl-IO-CaptureOutput-1.1104-1.fc22 perl-IO-Interface-1.09-1.fc22 perl-Lingua-EN-Inflect-Number-1.11-1.fc22 perl-Mail-Box-2.118-1.fc22 perl-Math-Int64-0.52-1.fc22 perl-Net-Domain-TLD-1.73-1.fc22 perl-Object-Realize-Later-0.19-1.fc22 perl-Pod-POM-0.29-1.fc22 perl-Set-Scalar-1.29-1.fc22 perl-String-Format-1.17-1.fc22 perl-Sub-Name-0.13-1.fc22 perl-Template-Toolkit-2.26-1.fc22 perl-Test-Cmd-1.08-1.fc22 perl-Test-MockModule-0.09-1.fc22 perl-Test-Number-Delta-1.06-1.fc22 perl-Text-Template-1.46-1.fc22 perl-Text-WikiFormat-0.81-1.fc22 perl-Tie-DBI-1.06-1.fc22 perl-Tie-IxHash-1.23-1.fc22 perl-UNIVERSAL-can-1.20140328-1.fc22 phoronix-test-suite-5.6.0-0.fc22 pinta-1.6-1.fc22 python-curtsies-0.1.19-1.fc22 python-greenlet-0.4.5-1.fc22 python-icalendar-3.9.0-1.fc22 python-sane-2.8.1-1.fc22 qdigidoc-3.10.0-1.fc22 qesteidutil-3.10.1-1.fc22 rOCCI-server-1.1.6-2.20150217git73409ea.fc22 rhythmbox-3.2-1.fc22 virt-manager-1.1.0-6.git8ca8490c.fc22 webkitgtk4-2.8.0-2.fc22 xfce4-mpc-plugi
Fedora 21 updates-testing report
The following Fedora 21 Security updates need testing: Age URL 106 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-16833/asterisk-11.14.2-1.fc21 98 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-17139/aeskulap-0.2.2-0.20beta1.fc21,orthanc-0.8.5-2.fc21,dcmtk-3.6.1-1.fc21 82 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-0264/gcab-0.4-7.fc21 74 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-0620/chicken-4.9.0.1-3.fc21 58 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-1467/openstack-glance-2014.1.3-4.fc21 51 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-1803/fcgi-2.4.0-26.fc21 43 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-2055/openldap-2.4.40-3.fc21 32 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-2584/echoping-6.1-0.beta.r434svn.1.fc21 30 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-2729/qpid-cpp-0.30-12.fc21 29 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-2849/drupal7-entity-1.6-1.fc21 24 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-3218/xterm-308-3.fc21 20 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-3505/389-ds-base-1.3.3.9-1.fc21 17 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-3569/icu-52.1-5.fc21 16 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-3612/ImageMagick-6.8.8.10-6.fc21 11 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4079/varnish-4.0.3-3.fc21 10 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4143/powerpc-utils-python-1.2.1-7.fc21 9 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4284/drupal7-ctools-1.7-1.fc21 3 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4725/tor-0.2.5.11-1.fc21 3 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4575/python-dulwich-0.10.0-1.fc21 3 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4684/glpi-0.84.8-4.fc21 3 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4482/osc-0.151.1-163.2.1.fc21 3 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4724/moodle-2.7.7-1.fc21 3 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4742/qtwebkit-2.3.4-6.fc21 3 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4564/mingw-qt5-qtbase-5.4.1-1.fc21,mingw-qt5-qtdeclarative-5.4.1-1.fc21,mingw-qt5-qtgraphicaleffects-5.4.1-1.fc21,mingw-qt5-qtimageformats-5.4.1-1.fc21,mingw-qt5-qtlocation-5.4.1-1.fc21,mingw-qt5-qtmultimedia-5.4.1-1.fc21,mingw-qt5-qtquick1-5.4.1-1.fc21,mingw-qt5-qtscript-5.4.1-1.fc21,mingw-qt5-qtsensors-5.4.1-1.fc21,mingw-qt5-qtsvg-5.4.1-1.fc21,mingw-qt5-qttools-5.4.1-1.fc21,mingw-qt5-qttranslations-5.4.1-1.fc21,mingw-qt5-qtwebkit-5.4.1-1.fc21,mingw-qt5-qtwinextras-5.4.1-1.fc21 3 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4666/rt-4.2.10-2.fc21 3 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4689/quassel-0.11.0-2.fc21 3 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4711/ca-certificates-2015.2.3-1.0.fc21 3 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4716/qt5-qtwebkit-5.4.1-4.fc21 3 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4658/libxml2-2.9.1-7.fc21 3 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4596/rest-0.7.93-1.fc21 3 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4699/libzip-0.11.2-5.fc21 3 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4565/mingw-libzip-0.11.2-3.fc21 3 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4642/PyYAML-3.11-7.fc21 3 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4476/owncloud-7.0.5-2.fc21 1 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4838/setroubleshoot-3.2.22-1.fc21 1 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4807/lasso-2.4.1-1.fc21 1 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4879/seamonkey-2.33.1-1.fc21 1 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4872/texlive-2014-3.1.20140525_r34255.fc21 1 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4747/freeipa-4.1.4-1.fc21,slapi-nis-0.54.2-1.fc21 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-5025/qemu-2.1.3-4.fc21 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-5055/drupal7-webform-4.7-1.fc21 The following Fedora 21 Critical Path updates have yet to be approved: Age URL 11 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4096/krb5-1.12.2-15.fc21 11 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4044/gvfs-1.22.4-1.fc21 9 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4288/perl-Carp-1.36-1.fc21 9 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4238/libgsf-1.14.29-6.fc21 9 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4273/vte291-0.38.3-1.fc21 9 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4263/libgweather-3.14.3-1.fc21 8 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4363/gdisk-1.0.0-1.fc21 8 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4379/crda-3.18_2015.03.13-1.fc21 3 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/u
Fedora 20 updates-testing report
The following Fedora 20 Security updates need testing: Age URL 118 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-15988/fail2ban-0.9.1-1.fc20 106 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-16845/resteasy-3.0.6-3.fc20 106 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-16825/asterisk-11.14.2-1.fc20 98 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-17089/aeskulap-0.2.2-0.20beta1.fc20,orthanc-0.8.5-2.fc20,dcmtk-3.6.1-1.fc20 74 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-0633/chicken-4.9.0.1-3.fc20 53 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-1648/lcms-1.19-13.fc20 53 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-1718/389-admin-1.1.38-1.fc20 51 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-1790/fcgi-2.4.0-26.fc20 36 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-0951/xdg-utils-1.1.0-0.38.rc3.fc20 32 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-2600/echoping-6.1-0.beta.r434svn.1.fc20 29 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-2826/drupal7-entity-1.6-1.fc20 24 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-3201/xterm-297-2.fc20 20 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-1165/patch-2.7.5-1.fc20 20 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-3417/389-ds-base-1.3.2.27-1.fc20 16 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-3738/ImageMagick-6.8.6.3-6.fc20 10 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4201/powerpc-utils-python-1.2.1-7.fc20 9 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4280/drupal7-ctools-1.7-1.fc20 9 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4332/texlive-2013-6.20131226_r32488.fc20 3 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4478/tor-0.2.5.11-1.fc20 3 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4516/glpi-0.84.8-4.fc20 3 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4530/moodle-2.6.10-1.fc20 3 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4486/ca-certificates-2015.2.3-1.0.fc20 3 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4534/python-dulwich-0.10.0-1.fc20 3 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4587/qt5-qtwebkit-5.4.1-4.fc20 3 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4549/osc-0.151.1-163.2.1.fc20 3 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4551/qtwebkit-2.3.4-6.fc20 3 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4672/quassel-0.11.0-2.fc20 3 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4703/mingw-qt5-qtbase-5.4.1-1.fc20,mingw-qt5-qtdeclarative-5.4.1-1.fc20,mingw-qt5-qtgraphicaleffects-5.4.1-1.fc20,mingw-qt5-qtimageformats-5.4.1-1.fc20,mingw-qt5-qtlocation-5.4.1-1.fc20,mingw-qt5-qtmultimedia-5.4.1-1.fc20,mingw-qt5-qtquick1-5.4.1-1.fc20,mingw-qt5-qtscript-5.4.1-1.fc20,mingw-qt5-qtsensors-5.4.1-1.fc20,mingw-qt5-qtsvg-5.4.1-1.fc20,mingw-qt5-qttools-5.4.1-1.fc20,mingw-qt5-qttranslations-5.4.1-1.fc20,mingw-qt5-qtwebkit-5.4.1-1.fc20,mingw-qt5-qtwinextras-5.4.1-1.fc20 3 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4554/rest-0.7.93-1.fc20 3 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4556/libzip-0.11.2-5.fc20 3 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4719/libxml2-2.9.1-4.fc20 3 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4669/mingw-libzip-0.11.2-3.fc20 3 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4693/owncloud-7.0.5-2.fc20 3 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4477/PyYAML-3.10-11.fc20 1 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4953/tcpdump-4.5.1-4.fc20 1 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4848/lasso-2.4.1-1.fc20 1 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4833/setroubleshoot-3.2.17-2.fc20 1 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4961/seamonkey-2.33.1-1.fc20 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-5024/kernel-3.19.3-100.fc20 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4994/drupal7-webform-4.7-1.fc20 The following Fedora 20 Critical Path updates have yet to be approved: Age URL 36 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-0951/xdg-utils-1.1.0-0.38.rc3.fc20 11 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4077/krb5-1.11.5-19.fc20 10 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4138/webkitgtk3-2.2.8-3.fc20 8 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4384/gdisk-1.0.0-1.fc20 8 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4380/crda-1.1.3_2015.03.13-1.fc20 3 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4486/ca-certificates-2015.2.3-1.0.fc20 3 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4551/qtwebkit-2.3.4-6.fc20 3 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4498/nss-util-3.18.0-1.fc20,nss-softokn-3.18.0-1.fc20,nss-3.18.0-1.fc20 3 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4554
