Karma Required - for security update
Hi All, Urgent testing required for below security updates :: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/firefox-39.0.3-1.fc23 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/firefox-39.0.3-1.fc22 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/firefox-39.0.3-1.fc22 Help is appreciated. Thanks & Regards, Amita -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: F23 on PATA or SATA ext. disk?
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 3:41 PM, Donavan Lance wrote: > Far from typical on x86 I'm sure, but I feel it is becoming a little > more common due to rising popularity of x86 based tablets. I use one > myself and rather than split the meager internal storage between > Windows and Linux I just keep Linux on an SD card. Works great. My SD card slot behavior sample size is small. It needs to work when it's the main way to boot, sure. But my experience on Macs has been crap. So at least on a Mac I'd say it's disqualified from being blocked on if it didn't boot a system. It might be in the category of video, where failures are taken on a case by case basis. -- Chris Murphy -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: F23 on PATA or SATA ext. disk?
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Fred Smith > wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 02:49:27PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: >>> On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Felix Miata wrote: >>> > Chris Murphy composed on 2015-08-06 13:19 (UTC-0600): >>> > >>> >> Adam Williamson wrote: >>> > >>> >>> On Thu, 2015-08-06 at 13:55 -0400, Joerg Lechner wrote: >>> > >> >>> > IOW, answer to OP is no difference whatsover, except possibly for a >>> > slight speed difference if USB3 rather than USB2 or Firewire. >>> >>> Yeah. And I don't even know if Fedora supports those interfaces for >>> booting. Obviously USB is for install media, because it has to, but >>> for /boot or root fs? I don't think so. There's no test for it anyway. >> >> i've certianly booted many fedora versions from USB,... both USB HD >> and USB flash sticks. why would you think it might not work? > > For the same reason anything might not work. The question raised by > "does Fedora support" means would Fedora block a release if this > didn't work. Yes if it were USB install media. But if for some reason > either installing to or booting from a system installed onto a USB > stick or drive? I don't know. Again there isn't a test case for USB > explicitly. > > I'd think it's more of an issue for ARM where USB and SD installations > are probably typical, where on x86 they're rare. Far from typical on x86 I'm sure, but I feel it is becoming a little more common due to rising popularity of x86 based tablets. I use one myself and rather than split the meager internal storage between Windows and Linux I just keep Linux on an SD card. Works great. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: F23 on PATA or SATA ext. disk?
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Fred Smith wrote: > On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 02:49:27PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Felix Miata wrote: >> > Chris Murphy composed on 2015-08-06 13:19 (UTC-0600): >> > >> >> Adam Williamson wrote: >> > >> >>> On Thu, 2015-08-06 at 13:55 -0400, Joerg Lechner wrote: >> > > >> > IOW, answer to OP is no difference whatsover, except possibly for a >> > slight speed difference if USB3 rather than USB2 or Firewire. >> >> Yeah. And I don't even know if Fedora supports those interfaces for >> booting. Obviously USB is for install media, because it has to, but >> for /boot or root fs? I don't think so. There's no test for it anyway. > > i've certianly booted many fedora versions from USB,... both USB HD > and USB flash sticks. why would you think it might not work? For the same reason anything might not work. The question raised by "does Fedora support" means would Fedora block a release if this didn't work. Yes if it were USB install media. But if for some reason either installing to or booting from a system installed onto a USB stick or drive? I don't know. Again there isn't a test case for USB explicitly. I'd think it's more of an issue for ARM where USB and SD installations are probably typical, where on x86 they're rare. -- Chris Murphy -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: F23 on PATA or SATA ext. disk?
On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 02:49:27PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Felix Miata wrote: > > Chris Murphy composed on 2015-08-06 13:19 (UTC-0600): > > > >> Adam Williamson wrote: > > > >>> On Thu, 2015-08-06 at 13:55 -0400, Joerg Lechner wrote: > > > > IOW, answer to OP is no difference whatsover, except possibly for a > > slight speed difference if USB3 rather than USB2 or Firewire. > > Yeah. And I don't even know if Fedora supports those interfaces for > booting. Obviously USB is for install media, because it has to, but > for /boot or root fs? I don't think so. There's no test for it anyway. i've certianly booted many fedora versions from USB,... both USB HD and USB flash sticks. why would you think it might not work? -- Fred Smith -- fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us - The Lord detests the way of the wicked but he loves those who pursue righteousness. - Proverbs 15:9 (niv) - -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: F23 on PATA or SATA ext. disk?
On 08/06/2015 02:13 PM, Joerg Lechner wrote: Hi, thank You for the advices. I will buy another Pata disk by ebay and then start testing F23. Kind Regards Please don't. Please test with SATA or newer hardware. External or internal. If you don't have a SATA external enclosure then also pick one of those up. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: F23 on PATA or SATA ext. disk?
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Felix Miata wrote: > Chris Murphy composed on 2015-08-06 13:19 (UTC-0600): > >> Adam Williamson wrote: > >>> On Thu, 2015-08-06 at 13:55 -0400, Joerg Lechner wrote: > for testing purposes I use a fast Laptop (with Win 8.1) and Fedora on an external disk. For F23 testing is it preferable to have the system on an PATA external disk? or SATA ext. disk? Or should this be no matter of significance? > >>> I wouldn't say there's a huge difference. > >> Have there been successes with SATA with failures with PATA? What was >> the nature? They're both handled by libata and seem sufficiently >> abstracted that I'd be surprised if the installer is aware of the >> difference. > > Looking at all the thread responses, I don't understand any of them. OP is > using a laptop right? While his external *might* be on eSATA, it's more > likely on Firewire, yet almost certainly on USB, especially if not a Mac, and > just as close to certainly *not* on PATA. Whether on Firewire or USB, neither > kernel nor drivers will know whether the outside end is on PATA or SATA, > right? Right. > IOW, answer to OP is no difference whatsover, except possibly for a > slight speed difference if USB3 rather than USB2 or Firewire. Yeah. And I don't even know if Fedora supports those interfaces for booting. Obviously USB is for install media, because it has to, but for /boot or root fs? I don't think so. There's no test for it anyway. -- Chris Murphy -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: F23 on PATA or SATA ext. disk?
Chris Murphy composed on 2015-08-06 13:19 (UTC-0600): > Adam Williamson wrote: >> On Thu, 2015-08-06 at 13:55 -0400, Joerg Lechner wrote: >>> for testing purposes I use a fast Laptop (with Win 8.1) and Fedora on >>> an external disk. >>> For F23 testing is it preferable to have the system on an PATA >>> external disk? or SATA ext. disk? Or should this be no matter of >>> significance? >> I wouldn't say there's a huge difference. > Have there been successes with SATA with failures with PATA? What was > the nature? They're both handled by libata and seem sufficiently > abstracted that I'd be surprised if the installer is aware of the > difference. Looking at all the thread responses, I don't understand any of them. OP is using a laptop right? While his external *might* be on eSATA, it's more likely on Firewire, yet almost certainly on USB, especially if not a Mac, and just as close to certainly *not* on PATA. Whether on Firewire or USB, neither kernel nor drivers will know whether the outside end is on PATA or SATA, right? IOW, answer to OP is no difference whatsover, except possibly for a slight speed difference if USB3 rather than USB2 or Firewire. -- "The wise are known for their understanding, and pleasant words are persuasive." Proverbs 16:21 (New Living Translation) Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks! Felix Miata *** http://fm.no-ip.com/ -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
[Test-Announce] Fedora 23 Alpha Go/No-Go Meeting - the second round, Friday, August 07 @ 17:00 UTC
As on the Go/No-Go meeting organized today (2015-Aug-06) we agreed to postpone the final decision for one day [1], I would like to ask you to join us once more on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-2 wherein we shall finally determine the readiness of the Fedora 23 Alpha. Friday, August 07, 2015 17:00 UTC (1 PM EDT, 10 AM PDT, 19:00 CEST) For more details about this meeting see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Go_No_Go_Meeting In the meantime, keep an eye on the Fedora 23 Alpha Blocker list: http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/milestone/23/alpha/buglist Regards, Jan [FedoCal] https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/2862/ [1] http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2015-08-06/f23_alpha_gono-go_meeting.2015-08-06-17.00.html/ -- Jan Kuřík ___ test-announce mailing list test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: F23 on PATA or SATA ext. disk?
On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 01:19:29PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Adam Williamson > >> external disk? or SATA ext. disk? Or should this be no matter of > >> significance? > > I wouldn't say there's a huge difference. > Have there been successes with SATA with failures with PATA? What was > the nature? They're both handled by libata and seem sufficiently > abstracted that I'd be surprised if the installer is aware of the > difference. Me too, although I also wouldn't be shocked to see the PATA part bitrotting. -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: F23 on PATA or SATA ext. disk?
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2015-08-06 at 13:55 -0400, Joerg Lechner wrote: >> Hi, >> for testing purposes I use a fast Laptop (with Win 8.1) and Fedora on >> an external disk. >> For F23 testing is it preferable to have the system on an PATA >> external disk? or SATA ext. disk? Or should this be no matter of >> significance? > > I wouldn't say there's a huge difference. Have there been successes with SATA with failures with PATA? What was the nature? They're both handled by libata and seem sufficiently abstracted that I'd be surprised if the installer is aware of the difference. -- Chris Murphy -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: F23 on PATA or SATA ext. disk?
Hi, thank You for the advices. I will buy another Pata disk by ebay and then start testing F23. Kind Regards -Ursprüngliche Mitteilung- Von: Adam Williamson An: For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases Verschickt: Do, 6 Aug 2015 8:29 pm Betreff: Re: F23 on PATA or SATA ext. disk? On Thu, 2015-08-06 at 13:55 -0400, Joerg Lechner wrote: > Hi, > for testing purposes I use a fast Laptop (with Win 8.1) and Fedora on > an external disk. > For F23 testing is it preferable to have the system on an PATA > external disk? or SATA ext. disk? Or should this be no matter of > significance? I wouldn't say there's a huge difference. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: F23 on PATA or SATA ext. disk?
On Thu, 2015-08-06 at 13:55 -0400, Joerg Lechner wrote: > Hi, > for testing purposes I use a fast Laptop (with Win 8.1) and Fedora on > an external disk. > For F23 testing is it preferable to have the system on an PATA > external disk? or SATA ext. disk? Or should this be no matter of > significance? I wouldn't say there's a huge difference. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: F23 on PATA or SATA ext. disk?
On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 01:55:40PM -0400, Joerg Lechner wrote: > for testing purposes I use a fast Laptop (with Win 8.1) and Fedora on > an external disk. For F23 testing is it preferable to have the system > on an PATA external disk? or SATA ext. disk? Or should this be no > matter of significance? I think both would be useful, for opposite reasons. Most modern systems and drives are SATA, so by testing that, you test what most people will see. On the other hand, by testing PATA, you're testing something more obscure, where problems are less likely to already have been noticed by somone else. -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
F23 on PATA or SATA ext. disk?
Hi, for testing purposes I use a fast Laptop (with Win 8.1) and Fedora on an external disk. For F23 testing is it preferable to have the system on an PATA external disk? or SATA ext. disk? Or should this be no matter of significance? Kind Regards -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
[Test-Announce] Fedora 23 Alpha Release Candidate 2 (RC2) Available Now!
Somewhat later than scheduled [1], Fedora 23 Alpha Release Candidate 2 (RC2) is now available for testing. Please help us complete as much of the validation testing as we can! Unfortunately there looks to already be a known blocker - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250874 - but it would still be valuable to cover all Alpha tests. No-one needs to kill themselves working on it, though! Content information, including changes, can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6213#comment:8 . Please see the following pages for download links and testing instructions. Normally dl.fedoraproject.org should provide the fastest download, but download- ib01.fedoraproject.org is available as a mirror (with an approximately 1 hour lag) in case of trouble. To use it, just replace "dl" with "download-ib01" in the download URL. Installation: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test Base: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Base_Test Workstation and Desktop: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Desktop_Test Server: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Server_Test Cloud: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Cloud_Test Summary: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Summary All Alpha priority test cases for each of these test pages [2] must pass in order to meet the Alpha Release Criteria [3]. We are also trying to run the Beta and Final tests at this time, to try and identify later release blocker bugs as early as possible. Help is available on #fedora-qa on irc.freenode.net [4], or on the test list [5]. Create Fedora 23 Alpha test compose (TC) and release candidate (RC) https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6213 Current Blocker and Freeze Exception bugs: http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current [1] http://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-23/f-23-quality-tasks.html [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_23_Alpha_Release_Criteria [4] irc://irc.freenode.net/fedora-qa [5] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net ___ test-announce mailing list test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Fedora 23 updates-testing report
The following Fedora 23 Security updates need testing: Age URL 6 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-12380/xfsprogs-3.2.4-1.fc23 3 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-12608/lxc-1.1.2-2.fc23 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-12679/xen-4.5.1-5.fc23 1 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-12739/python-kdcproxy-0.3.2-1.fc23 1 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-12750/wordpress-4.2.4-1.fc23 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-12852/pcre-8.37-3.fc23 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-12853/nagios-plugins-2.0.3-1.fc23 The following Fedora 23 Critical Path updates have yet to be approved: Age URL 1 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-12761/akonadi-1.13.0-19.fc23 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-12876/initscripts-9.64-1.fc23 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-12882/boost-1.58.0-3.fc23 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-12852/pcre-8.37-3.fc23 0 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-12859/exo-0.10.6-4.fc23 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora 23 updates-testing LuxRender-1.3.1-23.fc23 OpenImageIO-1.5.18-1.fc23 Random123-1.08-3.fc23 acpica-tools-20150717-1.fc23 blivet-gui-0.3.6-1.fc23 boost-1.58.0-3.fc23 canl-java-2.2.0-1.fc23 clojure-1.7.0-1.fc23 desktop-backgrounds-23.0.0-1.fc23 docker-client-3.1.2-1.fc23 emacs-mew-6.7-1.fc23 exo-0.10.6-4.fc23 gambas3-3.8.0-2.fc23 gdesklets-0.36.3-23.fc23 ghc-hjsmin-0.1.4.7-8.fc23 globus-gridftp-server-8.1-1.fc23 golang-github-hashicorp-consul-migrate-0-0.2.git4977886.fc23 golang-github-hashicorp-go-checkpoint-0-0.2.git88326f6.fc23 golang-github-hashicorp-go-multierror-0-0.2.gitfcdddc3.fc23 golang-github-hashicorp-go-syslog-0-0.2.git42a2b57.fc23 golang-github-hashicorp-golang-lru-0-0.2.gitd85392d.fc23 golang-github-hashicorp-hcl-0-0.2.git513e04c.fc23 golang-github-hashicorp-logutils-0-0.2.git367a65d.fc23 golang-github-hashicorp-mdns-0-0.2.git2b439d3.fc23 golang-github-hashicorp-net-rpc-msgpackrpc-0-0.2.gitd377902.fc23 golang-github-hashicorp-raft-boltdb-0-0.2.gitd1e82c1.fc23 golang-github-hashicorp-raft-mdb-0-0.2.git4ec3694.fc23 golang-github-hashicorp-scada-client-0-0.2.gitc26580c.fc23 golang-github-howeyc-gopass-0-0.2.git2c70fa7.fc23 golang-github-imdario-mergo-0-0.3.git6ce7536.fc23 golang-github-inconshreveable-muxado-0-0.2.gitf693c7e.fc23 golang-github-influxdb-hyperleveldb-go-0-0.3.gite24de94.fc23 golang-github-influxdb-rocksdb-0-0.3.git7adff3e.fc23 golang-github-jessevdk-go-flags-0-0.2.git5e11878.fc23 golang-github-jonboulle-clockwork-0-0.3.git3f831b6.fc23 grub2-2.02-0.21.fc23 hitch-1.0.0-0.4.3.beta4.fc23 initscripts-9.64-1.fc23 libinput-0.21.0-3.fc23 libsolv-0.6.11-3.git1f9abfb.fc23 man-db-2.7.1-8.fc23 mingw-crt-4.0.4-1.fc23 mingw-gcc-5.2.0-1.fc23 mingw-headers-4.0.4-1.fc23 mingw-winpthreads-4.0.4-1.fc23 mosh-1.2.5-1.fc23 nagios-plugins-2.0.3-1.fc23 nodejs-capture-stack-trace-1.0.0-2.fc23 nodejs-node-status-codes-1.0.0-1.fc23 nodejs-unzip-response-1.0.0-1.fc23 not-yet-commons-ssl-0.3.17-1.fc23 oath-toolkit-2.6.1-1.fc23 opencity-0.0.6.5-3.fc23 opensc-0.15.0-2.fc23 pcre-8.37-3.fc23 pcsc-lite-1.8.14-1.fc23 pcsc-lite-ccid-1.4.20-1.fc23 php-aws-sdk-2.8.17-1.fc23 php-pimple-3.0.1-1.fc23 php-symfony-psr-http-message-bridge-0.2-2.fc23 pure-ftpd-1.0.42-2.fc23 python-defusedxml-0.4.1-4.fc23 python-pid-2.0.1-2.fc23 python-pytools-2015.1.2-1.fc23 python-wsaccel-0.6.2-6.fc23 rubygem-cliver-0.3.2-3.fc23 snappy-player-1.0-6.20150728gitf33f7a.fc23 stoken-0.90-1.fc23 totpcgi-0.5.5-6.fc23 xmonad-0.11.1-2.fc23 yoshimi-1.3.5.2-1.fc23 Details about builds: LuxRender-1.3.1-23.fc23 (FEDORA-2015-12874) Lux Renderer, an unbiased rendering system Update Information: Rebuilt for blender-2.75 ChangeLog: * Thu Jul 30 2015 Jochen Schmitt - 1.3.1-23 - Rebuilt for blender-2.75 * Wed Jul 29 2015 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.3.1-22 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F23Boost159 * Wed Jul 22 2015 David Tardon - 1.3.1-21 - rebuild for Boost 1.58 OpenImageIO-1.5.18-1.fc23 (FEDORA-2015-12854) Library for reading and writing images Update Informat
F-23 Branched report: 20150806 changes
Compose started at Thu Aug 6 07:15:03 UTC 2015 Broken deps for armhfp -- [apache-scout] apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires mvn(org.apache.juddi:uddi-ws) apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires mvn(org.apache.juddi:juddi-client) [aws] aws-tools-2015-2.fc23.armv7hl requires libaws_ssl.so [deltaspike] deltaspike-test-utils-1.2.1-3.fc23.noarch requires mvn(org.jboss.arquillian.container:arquillian-container-test-spi) [dpm-contrib-admintools] dpm-contrib-admintools-0.2.1-6.fc23.armv7hl requires MySQL-python(armv7hl-32) [gammaray] gammaray-qt5-2.2.1-10.fc23.armv7hl requires qt5-qtbase(armv7hl-32) = 0:5.4.2 [ghc-hjsmin] ghc-hjsmin-0.1.4.7-7.fc23.armv7hl requires ghc(language-javascript-0.5.13-09e4f74578c09254f3515579177112ae) ghc-hjsmin-devel-0.1.4.7-7.fc23.armv7hl requires ghc-devel(language-javascript-0.5.13-09e4f74578c09254f3515579177112ae) [gnome-python2] gnome-python2-bonobo-2.28.1-16.fc23.armv7hl requires pyorbit(armv7hl-32) >= 0:2.0.1 [gnome-shell-extension-pomodoro] gnome-shell-extension-pomodoro-0.11.0-0.3.gitc7ad79d3.fc23.armv7hl requires libgnome-desktop-3.so.10 [gtksourceview-sharp] gtksourceview-sharp-2.0.12-24.fc23.armv7hl requires gtksourceview [hadoop] hadoop-common-2.4.1-8.fc22.noarch requires mvn(com.sun.jersey:jersey-servlet) hadoop-common-2.4.1-8.fc22.noarch requires mvn(com.sun.jersey:jersey-server) hadoop-common-2.4.1-8.fc22.noarch requires mvn(com.sun.jersey:jersey-json) hadoop-common-2.4.1-8.fc22.noarch requires mvn(com.sun.jersey:jersey-core) hadoop-hdfs-2.4.1-8.fc22.noarch requires mvn(com.sun.jersey:jersey-server) hadoop-hdfs-2.4.1-8.fc22.noarch requires mvn(com.sun.jersey:jersey-core) hadoop-mapreduce-2.4.1-8.fc22.noarch requires mvn(com.sun.jersey:jersey-server) hadoop-mapreduce-2.4.1-8.fc22.noarch requires mvn(com.sun.jersey.contribs:jersey-guice) hadoop-tests-2.4.1-8.fc22.noarch requires mvn(com.sun.jersey:jersey-servlet) hadoop-tests-2.4.1-8.fc22.noarch requires mvn(com.sun.jersey:jersey-server) hadoop-tests-2.4.1-8.fc22.noarch requires mvn(com.sun.jersey:jersey-json) hadoop-tests-2.4.1-8.fc22.noarch requires mvn(com.sun.jersey:jersey-core) hadoop-tests-2.4.1-8.fc22.noarch requires mvn(com.sun.jersey:jersey-client) hadoop-tests-2.4.1-8.fc22.noarch requires mvn(com.sun.jersey.contribs:jersey-guice) hadoop-yarn-2.4.1-8.fc22.noarch requires mvn(com.sun.jersey:jersey-server) hadoop-yarn-2.4.1-8.fc22.noarch requires mvn(com.sun.jersey:jersey-json) hadoop-yarn-2.4.1-8.fc22.noarch requires mvn(com.sun.jersey:jersey-core) hadoop-yarn-2.4.1-8.fc22.noarch requires mvn(com.sun.jersey:jersey-client) hadoop-yarn-2.4.1-8.fc22.noarch requires mvn(com.sun.jersey.contribs:jersey-guice) [hawaii-shell] hawaii-shell-0.3.0-3.fc22.armv7hl requires libqtaccountsservice-qt5.so.0.1.2 [hbase] hbase-0.98.3-4.fc22.noarch requires mvn(com.sun.jersey:jersey-server) hbase-0.98.3-4.fc22.noarch requires mvn(com.sun.jersey:jersey-json) hbase-0.98.3-4.fc22.noarch requires mvn(com.sun.jersey:jersey-core) hbase-tests-0.98.3-4.fc22.noarch requires mvn(com.sun.jersey:jersey-server) hbase-tests-0.98.3-4.fc22.noarch requires mvn(com.sun.jersey:jersey-json) hbase-tests-0.98.3-4.fc22.noarch requires mvn(com.sun.jersey:jersey-core) [klavaro] klavaro-3.01-0.pre1.1.fc23.1.armv7hl requires libgtkdataboks.so.0 [mariadb-galera] 1:mariadb-galera-server-10.0.17-5.fc23.armv7hl requires galera >= 0:25.3.3 [mesos] mesos-0.22.0-SNAPSHOT.1.c513126.fc22.1.armv7hl requires libprotobuf.so.8 python-mesos-0.22.0-SNAPSHOT.1.c513126.fc22.1.armv7hl requires libprotobuf.so.8 [moon-buggy] moon-buggy-1.0.51-14.fc23.armv7hl requires libesd.so.0 [ncbi-blast+] ncbi-blast+-2.2.31-1.fc23.armv7hl requires libxformat.so ncbi-blast+-2.2.31-1.fc23.armv7hl requires libxcleanup.so ncbi-blast+-2.2.31-1.fc23.armv7hl requires libvalid.so ncbi-blast+-2.2.31-1.fc23.armv7hl requires libpubmed.so ncbi-blast+-2.2.31-1.fc23.armv7hl requires libmlacli.so ncbi-blast+-2.2.31-1.fc23.armv7hl requires libmla.so ncbi-blast+-2.2.31-1.fc23.armv7hl requires libmedlars.so ncbi-blast+-2.2.31-1.fc23.armv7hl requires libgbseq.so [netbeans-platform] 1:netbeans-platform-harness-7.0.1-11.fc22.armv7hl requires cobertura >= 0:1.9.3 [nodejs-grunt-contrib-copy] nodejs-grunt-contrib-copy-0.8.0-2.fc23.noarch requires npm(file-sync-cmp) < 0:0.2 nodejs-grunt-contrib-copy-0.8.0-2.fc23.noarch requires npm(file-sync-cmp) >= 0:0.1.0 nodejs-grunt-contrib-copy-0.8.0-2.fc23.noarch requires npm(chalk) >= 0:0.5.1 [nodejs-grunt-saucelabs] nodejs-grunt-saucelabs-8.6.1-2.
