Fedora 25-20160805.n.0 compose check report
Missing expected images: Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64 Xfce raw-xz armhfp Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Minimal raw-xz armhfp Failed openQA tests: 68/88 (x86_64), 17/17 (i386) ID: 27436 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27436 ID: 27437 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27437 ID: 27438 Test: i386 Everything-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27438 ID: 27439 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27439 ID: 27440 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27440 ID: 27446 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27446 ID: 27447 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27447 ID: 27448 Test: i386 Workstation-live-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27448 ID: 27449 Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27449 ID: 27450 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27450 ID: 27451 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27451 ID: 27457 Test: i386 KDE-live-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27457 ID: 27458 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27458 ID: 27459 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27459 ID: 27460 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso support_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27460 ID: 27461 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_variation URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27461 ID: 27462 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27462 ID: 27463 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_updates_nfs URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27463 ID: 27464 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27464 ID: 27465 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27465 ID: 27476 Test: i386 Server-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27476 ID: 27477 Test: i386 Server-dvd-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27477 ID: 27478 Test: x86_64 universal install_package_set_minimal URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27478 ID: 27479 Test: x86_64 universal support_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27479 ID: 27480 Test: x86_64 universal install_software_raid URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27480 ID: 27481 Test: x86_64 universal install_delete_partial URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27481 ID: 27482 Test: x86_64 universal install_btrfs URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27482 ID: 27483 Test: x86_64 universal install_ext3 URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27483 ID: 27484 Test: x86_64 universal install_xfs URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27484 ID: 27485 Test: x86_64 universal install_lvmthin URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27485 ID: 27486 Test: x86_64 universal install_no_swap URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27486 ID: 27487 Test: x86_64 universal install_iscsi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27487 ID: 27488 Test: x86_64 universal install_package_set_kde URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27488 ID: 27489 Test: x86_64 universal install_simple_encrypted@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27489 ID: 27490 Test: x86_64 universal install_simple_free_space@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27490 ID: 27491 Test: x86_64 universal install_multi_empty@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27491 ID: 27492 Test: x86_64 universal install_software_raid@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27492 ID: 27493 Test: x86_64 universal install_delete_partial@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27493 ID: 27494 Test: x86_64 universal install_btrfs@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27494 ID: 27495 Test: x86_64 universal install_ext3@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27495 ID: 27496 Test: x86_64 universal install_xfs@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27496 ID: 27497 Test: x86_64 universal install_lvmthin@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27497 ID: 27498 Test: x86_64 universal install_no_swap@uefi URL: https://o
Re: Fedora 25-20160805.n.0 compose check report
On Fri, 2016-08-05 at 14:08 +, Fedora compose checker wrote: > Missing expected images: > > Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64 > Xfce raw-xz armhfp > Cloud_base raw-xz i386 > Atomic raw-xz x86_64 > Minimal raw-xz armhfp > > Failed openQA tests: 68/88 (x86_64), 17/17 (i386) Sorry folks, I'm afraid this is entirely my fault...yesterday I bumped openQA production to the version that's been running fine in staging for weeks, and it seems to have somehow broken really badly. The test 'failures' are not true failures but some kind of malfunction in openQA. I'll try and figure out what's going on and fix it, then re-run the tests. In the mean time you can see more correct results on staging (which is still working fine...), which look mostly like yesterday's: https://openqa.stg.fedoraproject.org/tests/overview?distri=fedora&version=25&build=Fedora-25-20160805.n.0&groupid=1 -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 25-20160805.n.0 compose check report
On Fri, 2016-08-05 at 08:50 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2016-08-05 at 14:08 +, Fedora compose checker wrote: > > > > Missing expected images: > > > > Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64 > > Xfce raw-xz armhfp > > Cloud_base raw-xz i386 > > Atomic raw-xz x86_64 > > Minimal raw-xz armhfp > > > > Failed openQA tests: 68/88 (x86_64), 17/17 (i386) > > Sorry folks, I'm afraid this is entirely my fault...yesterday I bumped > openQA production to the version that's been running fine in staging > for weeks, and it seems to have somehow broken really badly. The test > 'failures' are not true failures but some kind of malfunction in > openQA. I'll try and figure out what's going on and fix it, then re-run > the tests. In the mean time you can see more correct results on staging > (which is still working fine...), which look mostly like yesterday's: So I figured out the problem (I hope) - stupid monkey error, I neglected to update the openqa packages on the worker boxes, I only updated the os-autoinst packages - and have re-started the tests for this compose. A new check email should be sent out when they finish. Very sorry for the inconvenience. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: netinstall 20160730 compose, network is unreachable
On Sat, 2016-07-30 at 18:12 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > > > > On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 4:41 PM, Chris Murphy > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Using Fedora-Workstation-netinst-x86_64-25-20160730.n.0.iso in a > > > Fedora 24 virt-manager VM, I'm getting "failed to setup base > > > repository" from the installer. In a shell, ping fails to resolve, and > > > also says the network is unreachable if I ping an IP directly. > > > NetworkManager says the link is ready and up; ip -s a shows nothing > > > unusual, there is an IP assigned and it's sane. > > > > > > Any ideas? > > > > Same VM with F24 netinstall, there's no problem. And > > Fedora-Xfce-Live-x86_64-25-20160730.n.0.iso likewise has no problem. > > Huh. > > OpenQA shows something similar > > Fedora-Everything-netinst-x86_64-25-20160730.n.0.iso works in openqa. > https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/26385 > > Fedora-Server-netinst-x86_64-25-20160730.n.0.iso also works in openqa > up until a different problem happens, not related to software > selection. > > Fedora-Workstation-netinst-x86_64-25-20160730.n.0.iso in openqa gets > stuck on "error checking software selection" so it's a workstation > netinstall specific problem. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1358416 it should be fixed with tomorrow's compose. The Workstation netinst failure was not this bug, though; 'Error checking software selection' is entirely different from 'Failed to setup base repository', it's a much later failure, and is usually caused by dependency issues. That one was most likely the libreoffice bug. It's actually kind of odd that most of the openQA network install tests *didn't* hit this bug, I think it has something to do with details of the network configuration and the resulting NetworkManager composite dhclient config file. At least one openQA test *is* affected, though, and that's install_kickstart_nfs: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27314 which uses a slightly different network configuration (though oddly enough some other tests which use the *same* network configuration still work, so in summary...I don't know, what the hell). Anyhoo, the underlying cause in dracut should be fixed tomorrow, so this mess should hopefully go away. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora 25-20160805.n.0 compose check report
Missing expected images: Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64 Xfce raw-xz armhfp Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Minimal raw-xz armhfp Failed openQA tests: 36/88 (x86_64), 5/17 (i386) ID: 27542 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27542 ID: 27544 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27544 ID: 27545 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27545 ID: 27551 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27551 ID: 27552 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27552 ID: 27553 Test: i386 Workstation-live-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27553 ID: 27554 Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27554 ID: 27555 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27555 ID: 27556 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27556 ID: 27562 Test: i386 KDE-live-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27562 ID: 27564 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27564 ID: 27567 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27567 ID: 27570 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27570 ID: 27574 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27574 ID: 27576 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27576 ID: 27592 Test: x86_64 universal install_iscsi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27592 ID: 27594 Test: x86_64 universal install_simple_encrypted@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27594 ID: 27595 Test: x86_64 universal install_simple_free_space@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27595 ID: 27596 Test: x86_64 universal install_multi_empty@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27596 ID: 27597 Test: x86_64 universal install_software_raid@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27597 ID: 27598 Test: x86_64 universal install_delete_partial@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27598 ID: 27599 Test: x86_64 universal install_btrfs@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27599 ID: 27600 Test: x86_64 universal install_ext3@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27600 ID: 27601 Test: x86_64 universal install_xfs@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27601 ID: 27602 Test: x86_64 universal install_lvmthin@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27602 ID: 27603 Test: x86_64 universal install_no_swap@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27603 ID: 27605 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_minimal_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27605 ID: 27606 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27606 ID: 27607 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27607 ID: 27608 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_kde_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27608 ID: 27609 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_encrypted_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27609 ID: 27610 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_minimal_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27610 ID: 27611 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27611 ID: 27612 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27612 ID: 27613 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_kde_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27613 ID: 27614 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_encrypted_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27614 ID: 27622 Test: x86_64 universal install_kickstart_nfs URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27622 ID: 27627 Test: x86_64 universal install_delete_pata@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27627 ID: 27631 Test: x86_64 universal install_multi@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27631 ID: 27643 Test: i386 universal upgrade_desktop_32bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27643 ID: 27644 Test: i386 universal upgrade_2_desktop_32bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/27644 Passed openQA tests: 38/88 (x86_64), 12/17 (i386) Skipped openQA tests: 12 of 105 -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://g
QA group joining process: new members cannot subscribe to list until approved
Hi folks! In an IRC discussion with a new member this morning, we became aware of an issue (possibly some folks knew about this already, but I didn't!) in the joining process. This is mostly of interest to qa group moderators/sponsors, but I figured it can't hurt to make everyone aware. Recently, the Powers That Be have made it so you can't subscribe to Fedora mailing lists until you're a member of the FAS 'cla' group (which you become a member of by signing the contributor agreement) *and* one other group. This requirement is intended to combat spam coming from bots which just create new accounts, sign the CA, then start subscribing to lists and sending out spam - that whole process can be fully automated, and has apparently been a real problem. So the intent is to make sure only people who've been made a member of a 'real' FAS group by some kind of human, non-automatable process can join the lists. When we wrote https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Join , this wasn't the case, and the idea was more or less that people should apply to the group and *at the same time* join the mailing list and send a self- introduction mail; the self-intro would show that they were a genuine applicant, and moderators could approve their membership after seeing the self-introduction mail. Since then we made it a bit more ambiguous and made it so the self-introduction mail isn't required, but I still tend to look for a self-intro mail before approving new members. Obviously, with the new rules, many prospective members won't actually be able to join the list and send a self-intro at all until we approve their membership - they could only do so if they were already a member of some other Fedora group. So, I'm proposing we make a slightly tweaked process explicit. My suggestion is that it should work like this: 1. Prospective member sends group membership application 2. A sponsor contacts the prospective member - usually by email, but IRC is fine if both the prospective member and the sponsor happen to be there - to confirm they're a real person, really interested in QA, and they've read the Join page 3. If there's a positive response, the sponsor approves the membership 4. The member can now join the list and send a self-intro mail (encouraged but not required, as now) When contacting prospective members by email, sponsors should copy the mail to qa-spons...@fedoraproject.org , so other sponsors are aware that the prospective members have been contacted and we don't get duplicate contacts. If contacting *multiple* prospective members at once with a single mail, sponsors should send the mail To: qa-sponsors@ fedoraproject.org and *BCC* the prospective members, so their email addresses aren't disclosed to each other. Does this all sound OK? If so, I can tweak the Join page a bit to reflect this process, and maybe throw together a sponsor SOP for sponsors. Thanks everyone! -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora 23 updates-testing report
The following Fedora 23 Security updates need testing: Age URL 320 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-16240 nagios-4.0.8-1.fc23 277 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-81ded368fe miniupnpc-1.9-6.fc23 250 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-27392b3324 jbig2dec-0.12-2.fc23 201 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-dd52a54fa1 python-pymongo-3.0.3-1.fc23 201 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-06a7c972e8 thttpd-2.25b-37.fc23 166 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-637618fcd4 mingw-nsis-2.50-1.fc23 41 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-fcccb0a547 nodejs-0.10.46-1.fc23 22 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-a7322c9fd1 spice-0.12.8-1.fc23 20 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-70b5173c05 ecryptfs-utils-111-1.fc23 20 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-6db1c9eb69 dnsmasq-2.76-1.fc23 16 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-833533ffde ca-certificates-2016.2.8-1.0.fc23 16 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-d6288f555c libarchive-3.2.1-3.fc23 14 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-610fe5f5f8 libidn-1.33-1.fc23 8 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-bb0b94f8db perl-DBD-MySQL-4.033-2.fc23 8 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-6fd3131c03 v8-3.14.5.10-25.fc23 8 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3fba74e7f5 bind-9.10.4-1.P2.fc23 8 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-9402100276 openssh-7.2p2-5.fc23 selinux-policy-3.13.1-158.22.fc23 7 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-8d79ade826 flex-2.6.0-2.fc23 7 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-aa394a130e nodejs-string-dot-prototype-dot-repeat-0.2.0-2.fc23 7 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-0049aa6e5d xen-4.5.3-9.fc23 6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-0aa251bc9b perl-Module-Load-Conditional-0.68-1.fc23 6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-e8e353d493 krb5-1.14.1-8.fc23 6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-754e4768d8 kernel-4.6.5-200.fc23 6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-d46685629d libreswan-3.18-1.fc23 3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-9de7253cc7 lighttpd-1.4.41-1.fc23 1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-2941b3264e bind99-9.9.9-1.P2.fc23 dhcp-4.3.3-10.P1.fc23 1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3ecd34d592 cryptobone-1.0.5-1.fc23 1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-83189e6c2f drupal7-features-2.10-1.fc23 0 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-8354baae0f curl-7.43.0-8.fc23 0 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-6ec2009080 perl-5.22.2-354.fc23 0 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-aecfa7f583 drupal7-entity_translation-1.0-0.9.beta5.fc23 0 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-6802f2e52a fontconfig-2.11.94-5.fc23 The following Fedora 23 Critical Path updates have yet to be approved: Age URL 23 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-fc3a26d327 coreutils-8.24-8.fc23 20 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-6db1c9eb69 dnsmasq-2.76-1.fc23 18 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-70344c9c11 thunderbird-45.2.0-1.fc23 16 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-d6288f555c libarchive-3.2.1-3.fc23 16 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-833533ffde ca-certificates-2016.2.8-1.0.fc23 16 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-98a7a1b6e0 abrt-2.8.0-6.fc23 libreport-2.6.4-3.fc23 16 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-f76d52932c koji-1.10.1-10.fc23 14 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-610fe5f5f8 libidn-1.33-1.fc23 14 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-c87f8f1eb3 systemtap-3.0-3.fc23 11 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-6838cbe113 libcap-ng-0.7.8-1.fc23 8 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-9402100276 openssh-7.2p2-5.fc23 selinux-policy-3.13.1-158.22.fc23 8 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3fba74e7f5 bind-9.10.4-1.P2.fc23 8 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-bb0b94f8db perl-DBD-MySQL-4.033-2.fc23 8 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-ec7bd55286 lua-5.3.3-2.fc23 8 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-33b89975fe gpgme-1.6.0-3.fc23 python-pygpgme-0.3-18.fc23 7 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-979cb0cc41 PackageKit-1.1.3-2.fc23 6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-754e4768d8 kernel-4.6.5-200.fc23 6 https://bo
Fedora 24 updates-testing report
The following Fedora 24 Security updates need testing: Age URL 16 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-4373f7d32a pulp-2.8.6-1.fc24 pulp-docker-2.0.2-1.fc24 pulp-ostree-1.1.2-1.fc24 pulp-puppet-2.8.6-1.fc24 pulp-python-1.1.2-1.fc24 pulp-rpm-2.8.6-1.fc24 14 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-b3f93ead5b moin-1.9.8-1.fc24 8 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-e720bc8451 v8-3.14.5.10-25.fc24 7 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-c9ad9582f7 flex-2.6.0-2.fc24 7 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-c0fd203d6e nodejs-tough-cookie-2.3.1-1.fc24 6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-dd20a4631a perl-Module-Load-Conditional-0.68-1.fc24 6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-30e3636e79 kernel-4.6.5-300.fc24 6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-7098bdc536 pdns-4.0.1-1.fc24 3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-07e9059072 lighttpd-1.4.41-1.fc24 1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-432f067a80 cryptobone-1.0.5-1.fc24 1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-5b05ca41dd drupal7-features-2.10-1.fc24 0 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-40d5f1d3c2 pagure-2.3.4-1.fc24 0 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-8fd0599b02 drupal7-entity_translation-1.0-0.9.beta5.fc24 0 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-86434d618d 389-ds-base-1.3.5.12-1.fc24 0 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-e23ab56ce3 fontconfig-2.11.94-7.fc24 The following Fedora 24 Critical Path updates have yet to be approved: Age URL 8 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-494a721a73 ModemManager-1.6.0-1.fc24 libmbim-1.14.0-1.fc24 libqmi-1.16.0-1.fc24 usb_modeswitch-2.4.0-4.fc24 usb_modeswitch-data-20160612-3.fc24 6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-30e3636e79 kernel-4.6.5-300.fc24 0 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-e23ab56ce3 fontconfig-2.11.94-7.fc24 0 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-f739ece3cf NetworkManager-1.2.4-1.fc24 network-manager-applet-1.2.4-1.fc24 0 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-0be36f9048 gtk3-3.20.8-1.fc24 0 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-d88d6244a8 perl-Socket-2.023-1.fc24 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora 24 updates-testing 389-ds-base-1.3.5.12-1.fc24 NetworkManager-1.2.4-1.fc24 bcache-tools-1.0.8-6.fc24 corosync-2.4.1-1.fc24 drupal7-context-3.7-1.fc24 drupal7-date-2.10-0.1.rc1.fc24 drupal7-date_ical-3.9-1.fc24 drupal7-entity_translation-1.0-0.9.beta5.fc24 drupal7-file_entity-2.0-0.7.beta3.fc24 drupal7-libraries-2.3-1.fc24 drupal7-markdown-1.4-2.fc24 drupal7-metatag-1.17-1.fc24 drupal7-tmgmt-1.0-0.10.rc2.fc24 feedreader-1.6.1-1.fc24 fontconfig-2.11.94-7.fc24 fontopia-1.4-1.fc24 gdalcpp-1.1.1-3.20160601git225b97c.fc24 ghc-base-compat-0.9.1-2.fc24 gtk3-3.20.8-1.fc24 konversation-1.6.2-1.fc24 libart_lgpl-2.3.21-15.fc24 libinput-1.4.1-1.fc24 libosmium-2.8.0-1.fc24 network-manager-applet-1.2.4-1.fc24 ocserv-0.11.4-1.fc24 openqa-4.3-30.20160708git84c9461.fc24 os-autoinst-4.3-20.20160712gitf5bb0fe.fc24 osmium-tool-1.3.1-2.fc24 pag-0.6-3.fc24 perl-Module-CoreList-5.20160720-2.fc24 perl-POE-Component-Logger-1.10-13.fc24 perl-Socket-2.023-1.fc24 postfix-3.1.1-2.fc24 protozero-1.4.0-1.fc24 python-testify-0.11.0-1.fc24 system-switch-java-1.1.7.1-0.fc24 xonsh-0.4.4-1.fc24 Details about builds: 389-ds-base-1.3.5.12-1.fc24 (FEDORA-2016-86434d618d) 389 Directory Server (base) Update Information: Release 1.3.5.12-1 References: [ 1 ] Bug #1347761 - CVE-2016-4992 389-ds-base: 389-ds-base [fedora-all] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1347761 NetworkManager-1.2.4-1.fc24 (FEDORA-2016-f739ece3cf) Network connection manager and user applications Update Information: Update to NetworkManager 1.2.4 Upstream release notes: https://cgit.freedesktop.org/NetworkManager/NetworkManager/tree/NEWS?h=1.2.4 References: [ 1 ] Bug #1350201 - nmcli failed to modify IPv4 routes metric on i686 system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1
Re: QA group joining process: new members cannot subscribe to list until approved
On 08/05/2016 12:48 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hi folks! In an IRC discussion with a new member this morning, we > became aware of an issue (possibly some folks knew about this already, > but I didn't!) in the joining process. This is mostly of interest to qa > group moderators/sponsors, but I figured it can't hurt to make everyone > aware. > > Recently, the Powers That Be have made it so you can't subscribe to > Fedora mailing lists until you're a member of the FAS 'cla' group > (which you become a member of by signing the contributor agreement) > *and* one other group. This requirement is intended to combat spam > coming from bots which just create new accounts, sign the CA, then > start subscribing to lists and sending out spam - that whole process > can be fully automated, and has apparently been a real problem. So the > intent is to make sure only people who've been made a member of a > 'real' FAS group by some kind of human, non-automatable process can > join the lists. > > When we wrote https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Join , this wasn't the > case, and the idea was more or less that people should apply to the > group and *at the same time* join the mailing list and send a self- > introduction mail; the self-intro would show that they were a genuine > applicant, and moderators could approve their membership after seeing > the self-introduction mail. Since then we made it a bit more ambiguous > and made it so the self-introduction mail isn't required, but I still > tend to look for a self-intro mail before approving new members. > > Obviously, with the new rules, many prospective members won't actually > be able to join the list and send a self-intro at all until we approve > their membership - they could only do so if they were already a member > of some other Fedora group. > > So, I'm proposing we make a slightly tweaked process explicit. My > suggestion is that it should work like this: > > 1. Prospective member sends group membership application > 2. A sponsor contacts the prospective member - usually by email, but > IRC is fine if both the prospective member and the sponsor happen to be > there - to confirm they're a real person, really interested in QA, and > they've read the Join page > 3. If there's a positive response, the sponsor approves the membership > 4. The member can now join the list and send a self-intro mail > (encouraged but not required, as now) > > When contacting prospective members by email, sponsors should copy the > mail to qa-spons...@fedoraproject.org , so other sponsors are aware > that the prospective members have been contacted and we don't get > duplicate contacts. If contacting *multiple* prospective members at > once with a single mail, sponsors should send the mail To: qa-sponsors@ > fedoraproject.org and *BCC* the prospective members, so their email > addresses aren't disclosed to each other. > > Does this all sound OK? If so, I can tweak the Join page a bit to > reflect this process, and maybe throw together a sponsor SOP for > sponsors. Thanks everyone! Uh, wouldn't the addition of a "captcha" on the signup page make joining up without requiring additional group memberships easier and more bot-proof? That would also prevent the sponsors having to deal with a slew of botted initial contacts. Just a thought. -- - Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigitalri...@alldigital.com - - AIM/Skype: therps2ICQ: 226437340 Yahoo: origrps2 - -- - Politicians are the opposite of pickpockets because you never see - -them take their hand out of your pocket.- - -- Larry Fine - -- -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: QA group joining process: new members cannot subscribe to list until approved
On Fri, 2016-08-05 at 14:22 -0700, Rick Stevens wrote: > Uh, wouldn't the addition of a "captcha" on the signup page make > joining up without requiring additional group memberships easier and > more bot-proof? That would also prevent the sponsors having to deal > with a slew of botted initial contacts. Well, I'm just trying to match up with what's actually happened, as opposed to debating whether the Fedora sysadmins could handle the spam problem differently, I'd rather not get diverted too far down that track. But in general I'd say our sysadmin folks are pretty good at what they do and I'm inclined to trust them. I'm nowhere near as experienced in such matters as they are, but it's my general understanding that captchas are a long way from foolproof, and the better captcha systems tend to be ones Fedora does not find palatable (as they tend to involve roping the user in to be an unpaid image recognition worker for Google...) -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: QA group joining process: new members cannot subscribe to list until approved
On Fri, 05 Aug 2016 12:48:39 -0700 Adam Williamson wrote: > Hi folks! In an IRC discussion with a new member this morning, we > became aware of an issue (possibly some folks knew about this already, > but I didn't!) in the joining process. This is mostly of interest to > qa group moderators/sponsors, but I figured it can't hurt to make > everyone aware. > > Recently, the Powers That Be have made it so you can't subscribe to > Fedora mailing lists until you're a member of the FAS 'cla' group > (which you become a member of by signing the contributor agreement) > *and* one other group. This requirement is intended to combat spam > coming from bots which just create new accounts, sign the CA, then > start subscribing to lists and sending out spam - that whole process > can be fully automated, and has apparently been a real problem. So the > intent is to make sure only people who've been made a member of a > 'real' FAS group by some kind of human, non-automatable process can > join the lists. This is not correct. You absolutely do not need cla+1 to join a mailing list. How could that even be enforced? You can sign into mailman with yahoo or persona (which have no ideas about groups). Fas does, but you can add arbitrary email addresses to your account. In short, this is not the case that I know of, so no adjustment should need to be made. kevin pgpL3RE1RN2FQ.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: QA group joining process: new members cannot subscribe to list until approved
On Fri, 2016-08-05 at 15:54 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Fri, 05 Aug 2016 12:48:39 -0700 > Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > > Hi folks! In an IRC discussion with a new member this morning, we > > became aware of an issue (possibly some folks knew about this already, > > but I didn't!) in the joining process. This is mostly of interest to > > qa group moderators/sponsors, but I figured it can't hurt to make > > everyone aware. > > > > Recently, the Powers That Be have made it so you can't subscribe to > > Fedora mailing lists until you're a member of the FAS 'cla' group > > (which you become a member of by signing the contributor agreement) > > *and* one other group. This requirement is intended to combat spam > > coming from bots which just create new accounts, sign the CA, then > > start subscribing to lists and sending out spam - that whole process > > can be fully automated, and has apparently been a real problem. So the > > intent is to make sure only people who've been made a member of a > > 'real' FAS group by some kind of human, non-automatable process can > > join the lists. > > This is not correct. You absolutely do not need cla+1 to join a mailing > list. How could that even be enforced? You can sign into mailman with > yahoo or persona (which have no ideas about groups). > > Fas does, but you can add arbitrary email addresses to your account. > > In short, this is not the case that I know of, so no adjustment should > need to be made. Hmm, sorry. Someone said this was the case on IRC, and I didn't actually check - I should have. Still, we could probably clarify the join process in any case. I'll come up with a separate proposal for that. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: QA group joining process: new members cannot subscribe to list until approved
On Fri, 05 Aug 2016 15:08:49 -0700 Adam Williamson wrote: > Hmm, sorry. Someone said this was the case on IRC, and I didn't > actually check - I should have. > > Still, we could probably clarify the join process in any case. I'll > come up with a separate proposal for that. Note that the one change we did make was for the wiki... it needs cla+1 now. We have talked about making a 'wikieditors' group and sponsoring in anyone that needs to edit the wiki to that, but we haven't really sorted that out yet. kevin pgpkK50ag9Km_.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: QA group joining process: new members cannot subscribe to list until approved
On Fri Aug 05 2016 16:08:49 GMT-0600 (MDT) Adam Williamson wrote: > Still, we could probably clarify the join process in any case. What's the purpose of phone number in FAS? It's a piece of personal information spammers will never reveal. -- Viorel -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: QA group joining process: new members cannot subscribe to list until approved
On Fri, 2016-08-05 at 16:48 -0600, Viorel Tabara wrote: > On Fri Aug 05 2016 16:08:49 GMT-0600 (MDT) Adam Williamson > wrote: > > > > Still, we could probably clarify the join process in any case. > > What's the purpose of phone number in FAS? It's a piece of personal > information > spammers will never reveal. Well we're definitely out of scope now...but for some key personnel (people with admin access to key servers and so on), we actually do need as many contact methods as possible. If there's a massive hack or a huge security issue, or something, we need to be able to get in touch with folks very quickly, an email or IRC ping may not cut it. I don't know if that's the reason, just thinking it through. It may also have had something to do with the really old CLA, I have vague memories that that involved faxes and stuff at some point, but it may just be the drugs talking... -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
