Fedora 24 updates-testing report

2017-02-19 Thread updates 
The following Fedora 24 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
  92  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-93679a91df   
jenkins-1.651.3-2.fc24 jenkins-remoting-2.62.3-1.fc24
  61  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-26f9817b08   
squid-3.5.23-1.fc24
  54  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-eaaa9c4a08   
exim-4.87.1-1.fc24
  18  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-ba9c6a3634   
quagga-0.99.24.1-5.fc24
  17  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-ece16ba6ba   
runc-1.0.0-5.rc2.gitc91b5be.fc24
  14  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-22828d4bdb   
redis-3.2.7-1.fc24
  10  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-9a5b89363f   
libwmf-0.2.8.4-50.fc24
  10  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-fa4e441e03   
netpbm-10.77.00-3.fc24
  10  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-404f1a29fc   
mingw-gtk-vnc-0.7.0-1.fc24
  10  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-a9e6a5c249   
gtk-vnc-0.7.0-1.fc24
   8  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-9b2cf468d5   
vim-8.0.324-1.fc24
   8  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-abbfa3f1a9   
python-cjson-1.1.0-9.fc24
   6  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-85f2aa   
mupdf-1.10a-1.fc24
   6  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-40d29c8e84   
kopete-16.12.2-2.fc24
   6  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-33cb46c6b0   
diffoscope-77-1.fc24
   5  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-624e2eeda0   
mujs-0-8.20170124git4006739.fc24
   5  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-13b5cb36c3   
plasma-desktop-5.8.5-4.fc24
   3  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-b1abcbe695   
webkitgtk4-2.14.5-1.fc24
   3  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-787bc0d5b4   
kernel-4.9.10-100.fc24
   2  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-f9f3a78148   
suricata-3.2.1-1.fc24
   2  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-d4ee7018c1   
xen-4.6.4-7.fc24
   2  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-19c5440abe   
tomcat-8.0.41-1.fc24


The following Fedora 24 Critical Path updates have yet to be approved:
 Age URL
  10  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-176122b6c4   
ntfs-3g-2016.2.22-4.fc24
   9  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-85415b3949   
lua-5.3.4-1.fc24
   8  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-9b2cf468d5   
vim-8.0.324-1.fc24
   6  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-acb5ebda45   
audit-2.7.2-2.fc24
   3  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-787bc0d5b4   
kernel-4.9.10-100.fc24
   3  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-a8dc348834   
pcre-8.40-2.fc24
   1  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-37dac69023   
baloo-widgets-16.12.2-1.fc24 dolphin-16.12.2-1.fc24 
dolphin-plugins-16.12.2-1.fc24 kate-16.12.2-1.fc24 kde-l10n-16.12.2-2.fc24 
kde-runtime-16.12.2-2.fc24 kdelibs-4.14.29-1.fc24 khelpcenter-16.12.2-1.fc24 
konsole5-16.12.2-1.fc24
   0  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-9f83ba7048   
akonadi-calendar-tools-16.12.2-1.fc24 akonadi-import-wizard-16.12.2-1.fc24 
akonadiconsole-16.12.2-1.fc24 akregator-16.12.2-1.fc24 balsa-2.5.2-3.fc24.1 
blogilo-16.12.2-1.fc24 gpgme-1.8.0-10.fc24 grantlee-editor-16.12.2-1.fc24 
kaddressbook-16.12.2-1.fc24 kalarm-16.12.2-1.fc24 kde-runtime-16.12.2-2.fc24.1 
kdepim-addons-16.12.2-1.fc24 kdepim-apps-libs-16.12.2-1.fc24 
kdepim-runtime-16.12.2-1.fc24 kdepimlibs-4.14.10-17.fc24 
kf5-akonadi-calendar-16.12.2-1.fc24 kf5-akonadi-contacts-16.12.2-1.fc24 
kf5-akonadi-mime-16.12.2-1.fc24 kf5-akonadi-notes-16.12.2-1.fc24 
kf5-akonadi-search-16.12.2-1.fc24 kf5-akonadi-server-16.12.2-1.fc24 
kf5-calendarsupport-16.12.2-1.fc24 kf5-eventviews-16.12.2-1.fc24 
kf5-gpgmepp-16.08.3-3.fc24 kf5-grantleetheme-16.12.2-1.fc24 
kf5-incidenceeditor-16.12.2-1.fc24 kf5-kalarmcal-16.12.2-1.fc24 
kf5-kblog-16.12.2-1.fc24 kf5-kcalendarcore-16.12.2-1.fc24 
kf5-kcalendarutils-16.12.2-1.fc24 kf5-kcontacts-16.12
 .2-1.fc24 kf5-kholidays-16.12.2-1.fc24 kf5-kidentitymanagement-16.12.2-1.fc24 
kf5-kimap-16.12.2-1.fc24 kf5-kldap-16.12.2-1.fc24 
kf5-kmailtransport-16.12.2-1.fc24 kf5-kmbox-16.12.2-1.fc24 
kf5-kmime-16.12.2-1.fc24 kf5-kontactinterface-16.12.2-1.fc24 
kf5-kpimtextedit-16.12.2-1.fc24 kf5-ktnef-16.12.2-1.fc24 
kf5-libgravatar-16.12.2-1.fc24 kf5-libkdepim-16.12.2-1.fc24 
kf5-libkleo-16.12.2-1.fc24 kf5-libksieve-16.12.2-1.fc24 
kf5-mailcommon-16.12.2-1.fc24 kf5-mailimporter-16.12.2-1.fc24 
kf5-messagelib-16.12.2-1.fc24 kf5-pimcommon-16.12.2-1.fc24 
kf5-syndication-16.12.2-1.fc24 kget-16.12.2-1.fc24.1 kleopatra-16.12.2-1.fc24 
kmail-16.12.2-1.fc24 kmail-account-wizard-16.12.2-1.fc24 knotes-16.12.2-1.fc24 
kontact-16.12.2-1.fc24 korganizer-16.12.2-1.fc24 mbox-importer-16.12.2-1.fc24 
ostree-2017.2-2.fc24.1 pim-data-exporter-16.12.2-1.fc24

Re: Moan about dnf on Rawhide

2017-02-19 Thread Adam Williamson 
On Sun, 2017-02-19 at 09:07 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> So as there was a successful Rawhide compose today,
> what's there now (allowing for mirror sync) has changed since yesterday
> and the updated dnf is there.

Sorry, I was wrong about this, I misread my emails a bit. There's still
not been a successful compose since 20170215. Hopefully we get one
soon.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Moan about dnf on Rawhide

2017-02-19 Thread stan 
On Sun, 19 Feb 2017 16:43:39 -0800
Adam Williamson  wrote:

> It's nothing new, this is how Python has always worked, all the way
> back to 2.x (not sure about 1.x). Minor release versions always bump
> the ABI.

I've never noticed it before.  It seems counter intuitive to me, like
bumping a library so number without raising the version number. I
suppose there must be a reason.

> I'd just do a --best --allowerasing and see what it's actually blocked
> on. There aren't actually many things left that aren't rebuilt for
> Python 3.6 at this point, and most of the ones that are left are
> pretty obscure. You can see the list in every 'rawhide compose
> report' mail, as it lists all packages whose dependencies cannot be
> resolved. Most of the issues in the current Rawhide compose are
> actually with boost.

Thanks, this should be helpful.  If I can delete just a few packages,
and get the update to succeed, then I can re-install them when they get
updated.

Yeah, I think I noticed boost in the list of problems dnf produced.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Moan about dnf on Rawhide

2017-02-19 Thread stan 
On Sun, 19 Feb 2017 14:14:26 -0700
Viorel Tabara  wrote:

> Or use the rpmdb from a backup as a reference to bring the system to  
> that state. 

It's back in the original state, I just had to force install a dnf
version that was compatible with python3 3.5 ABI.  The problem is that
it won't update to python3 3.6 ABI from there.  I'll have to do some
manual manipulations to get there.

> On a related note, I recall a discussion somewhere on the Fedora
> mailing lists, about doing an LVM snapshot of rootfs prior to
> upgrading as an easy way to roll back.

I think I remember reading that.  And, I think I've seen dnf taking a
snapshot before updating if the snapshot plugin is installed and
enabled.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Moan about dnf on Rawhide

2017-02-19 Thread stan 
On Sun, 19 Feb 2017 14:07:28 -0700
Viorel Tabara  wrote:

> I prefer to keep the Koji URL as a visual clue in dnf history:

[snip]

That was interesting.  I learned something new.  Thanks.

> I try to stay away from  "allowerasing" -- once I had to go through a 
> massive rpm-fu work. It was fun but time consuming.

Yeah, that's why I'm holding off too.
 
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora 25 updates-testing report

2017-02-19 Thread updates 
The following Fedora 25 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
  54  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-d79ba708cb   
exim-4.87.1-1.fc25
  10  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-c3739273e5   
mingw-gtk-vnc-0.7.0-1.fc25
  10  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-c0564718ea   
mingw-gstreamer1-1.10.3-1.fc25
   9  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-a56d78acb8   
mingw-gstreamer1-plugins-base-1.10.3-1.fc25
   9  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-1fc4026d15   
mingw-gstreamer1-plugins-good-1.10.3-1.fc25
   9  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-216f4b9f9d   
mingw-gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free-1.10.3-1.fc25
   8  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-7803508155   
python-cjson-1.1.0-9.fc25
   6  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-6fe982684d   
mupdf-1.10a-1.fc25
   6  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-3fb57530fb   
kopete-16.12.2-2.fc25
   6  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-101722eb25   
diffoscope-77-1.fc25
   5  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-dc6023e849   
mujs-0-8.20170124git4006739.fc25
   5  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-c1cd67adc1   
plasma-desktop-5.8.5-4.fc25
   2  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-0beb752b6e   
webkitgtk4-2.14.5-1.fc25
   2  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-2b0459f416   
python-PyMySQL-0.7.10-10.fc25
   2  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-8fffbae8af   
xrdp-0.9.1-3.fc25
   2  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-84ed105d3e   
xen-4.7.1-8.fc25
   2  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-0054c7b1f0   
kernel-4.9.10-200.fc25
   2  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-f3aac83a8f   
suricata-3.2.1-1.fc25
   2  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c   
tomcat-8.0.41-1.fc25
   0  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-8b0737b093   
cacti-1.0.3-2.fc25


The following Fedora 25 Critical Path updates have yet to be approved:
 Age URL
  40  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-70547b9af8   
python-productmd-1.4-1.fc25
  31  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-d117622795   
pungi-4.1.12-1.fc25
  12  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-adc3383af9   
python-pyasn1-0.2.1-1.fc25
   4  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-a426fde91b   
grilo-0.3.3-1.fc25 grilo-plugins-0.3.4-1.fc25
   2  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-0054c7b1f0   
kernel-4.9.10-200.fc25
   2  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-c2e66ffe47   
pcre-8.40-2.fc25
   2  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-0beb752b6e   
webkitgtk4-2.14.5-1.fc25
   2  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-9f6383547e   
libglvnd-0.2.999-10.gitdc16f8c.fc25 libva-1.7.3-3.fc25 mesa-13.0.4-1.fc25 
wlc-0.0.7-3.git12ee978.fc25
   1  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-0f2acf86d2   
qca-2.1.3-3.fc25


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora 25 updates-testing

cacti-1.0.3-2.fc25
ccache-3.3.4-1.fc25
dnfdragora-1.0.0-1.fc25
fbzx-3.6.0-1.fc25
frescobaldi-2.20.0-1.fc25
fusioninventory-agent-2.3.19-1.fc25
gammaray-2.7.0-2.fc25
gdouros-alexander-fonts-7.17-2.fc25
lsyncd-2.2.2-1.fc25
open-vm-tools-10.1.0-1.fc25
openfst-1.6.1-1.fc25
opengrm-ngram-1.3.2-3.fc25
pcp-3.11.8-1.fc25
php-sebastian-object-enumerator-2.0.1-1.fc25
poedit-1.8.12-1.fc25
python-sphinx-1.5.2-2.fc25
rawtherapee-5.0-3.r1.fc25
recoll-1.22.4-1.fc25
sphinxtrain-1.0.8-33.fc25

Details about builds:



 cacti-1.0.3-2.fc25 (FEDORA-2017-8b0737b093)
 An rrd based graphing tool

Update Information:

- Update to 1.0.3  Release notes:   http://www.cacti.net/release_notes_1_0_0.php
http://www.cacti.net/release_notes_1_0_1.php
http://www.cacti.net/release_notes_1_0_2.php
http://www.cacti.net/release_notes_1_0_3.php

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #1417604 - CVE-2014-4000 cacti: Multiple issues fixed in 1.0.0 
version [fedora-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1417604
  [ 2 ] Bug #1417494 - cacti-1.0.2 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1417494
  [ 3 ] Bug #1422854 - cacti-1.0.3 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422854




 ccache-3.3.4-1.fc25 (FEDORA-2017-d125fefd2c)
 C/C++ compiler cache

Update

[Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2017-02-20 Fedora blocker review meeting

2017-02-19 Thread Adam Williamson 
Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel tomorrow's blocker review meeting.
There's just one proposed Alpha blocker to review:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1405790

and no proposed Alpha freeze exceptions. The proposed blocker should be
pretty straightforward, so if a few people can vote in the bug, we
should be good.

Thanks folks!
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
test-announce mailing list -- test-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2017-02-20 Fedora QA Meeting

2017-02-19 Thread Adam Williamson 
Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting tomorrow. I don't have
anything significant for the agenda, I think we covered everything
pretty well last week.

If you think there is something we need to discuss, please do reply to
this mail and we can go ahead and schedule the meeting! Thanks.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
test-announce mailing list -- test-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Moan about dnf on Rawhide

2017-02-19 Thread Adam Williamson 
On Sun, 2017-02-19 at 11:23 -0700, stan wrote:
> 
> I downgraded to the last version of dnf that uses the python 3.5 ABI,
> and dnf works again, with occasional segfaults.  But it won't update
> anything because there are too many conflicts with going to python
> 3.6.  How is this not python 4?  If the ABI changes so much between 3.5
> and 3.6 that they are backward incompatible, then it isn't python3
> any more.  What are the python developers thinking?

It's nothing new, this is how Python has always worked, all the way
back to 2.x (not sure about 1.x). Minor release versions always bump
the ABI.

> I ran a dnf --best update and there are 317 errors, and dnf skips
> everything.  :-)  
> 
> Most of the errors are related to the 3.6 ABI update, and packages that
> aren't upgraded yet.  They propagate back up the libsolv chain, and
> prevent everything else from updating.
> 
> I suppose I'll be forced to --allowerasing if I want to do a dnf
> update.  Or force install the dnf dependencies of the new 3.6 ABI so I
> can then run dnf update and have it update everything else.

I'd just do a --best --allowerasing and see what it's actually blocked
on. There aren't actually many things left that aren't rebuilt for
Python 3.6 at this point, and most of the ones that are left are pretty
obscure. You can see the list in every 'rawhide compose report' mail,
as it lists all packages whose dependencies cannot be resolved. Most of
the issues in the current Rawhide compose are actually with boost.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Moan about dnf on Rawhide

2017-02-19 Thread stan 
On Sun, 19 Feb 2017 11:23:24 -0700
stan  wrote:

> I ran a dnf --best update and there are 317 errors, and dnf skips
> everything.  :-)  

The python3-hawkey package is part of the libdnf src rpm, so it exists,
but is being blocked from install because it requires python3 3.6, and
that is being blocked.

I started to unravel the dependencies, but got disillusioned because
there were so many of them and they were like spaghetti, so I put it on
hold for a while.  When I get my enthusiasm back, I'll revisit the
problems.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Moan about dnf on Rawhide

2017-02-19 Thread Viorel Tabara 
On Sun Feb 19 2017 11:23:24 GMT-0700 (MST) stan 
 wrote: 
> I ran a dnf --best update and there are 317 errors, and dnf skips 
> everything.  :-)   
[...] 
> I suppose I'll be forced to --allowerasing if I want to do a dnf 
> update.  Or force install the dnf dependencies of the new 3.6 ABI so I 
> can then run dnf update and have it update everything else. 
>  
> What a mess.  Maybe a new install of rawhide would be easier. 
 
Or use the rpmdb from a backup as a reference to bring the system to  
that state. 
 
On a related note, I recall a discussion somewhere on the Fedora mailing  
lists, about doing an LVM snapshot of rootfs prior to upgrading as an  
easy way to roll back. 
 
--  
Viorel 
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Moan about dnf on Rawhide

2017-02-19 Thread Viorel Tabara 
On Sun Feb 19 2017 09:50:24 GMT-0700 (MST) stan 
 wrote: 
> Not here.  I tried all kinds of variations of the above, and I keep 
> getting errors.

I prefer to keep the Koji URL as a visual clue in dnf history:

   [root@omiday ~]# dnf history dnf
   Last metadata expiration check: 2:11:01 ago on Sun Feb 19 11:40:53 2017 MST.
   ID | Command line | Date and time| Action(s)  | 
Altered
   
---
  323 | install https://kojipkgs | 2017-02-17 22:55 | Update |7 
 <
  322 | upgrade dnf  | 2017-02-17 22:50 | Update |9 
> 
  275 | -y upgrade   | 2017-01-01 20:31 | I, O, U|  708 
EE
  265 | upgrade  | 2016-12-19 13:38 | E, I, O, U |  615 
EE
  227 | --releasever=rawhide sys | 2016-11-24 17:55 | D, E, I, O, U  | 1358 
EE
  200 | -y upgrade   | 2016-10-20 10:59 | E, I, U|  146 
  
  145 | upgrade  | 2016-09-15 20:22 | E, I, O, U |  209 
EE
  117 | --nogpgcheck upgrade | 2016-08-20 16:33 | E, I, U|   91 
  
  100 | --releasever=25 system-u | 2016-08-11 13:56 | D, E, I, O, U  | 1492 
EE
  1 |  | 2016-06-14 10:31 | Install| 1364 EE

It does take me a bit longer to build the dependency list but it's not 
something that bothers me that much, I rarely rely on Koji RPMs:

   [root@omiday ~]# dnf history info 323
   Last metadata expiration check: 2:11:12 ago on Sun Feb 19 11:40:53 2017 MST.
   Transaction ID : 323
   Begin time : Fri Feb 17 22:55:16 2017
   Begin rpmdb: 2651:a559e374360c3500f0c5d574f47f2d81aab6a6ab
   End time   :22:55:23 2017 (7 seconds)
   End rpmdb  : 2652:70ab883f3c3b46c029d1650e7d60b5571e6df359
   User   :  
   Return-Code: Success
   Command Line   : install 
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/dnf/2.1.0/1.fc26/noarch/dnf-2.1.0-1.fc26.noarch.rpm
 
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/dnf/2.1.0/1.fc26/noarch/python2-dnf-2.1.0-1.fc26.noarch.rpm
 
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/dnf/2.1.0/1.fc26/noarch/dnf-conf-2.1.0-1.fc26.noarch.rpm
 
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/dnf/2.1.0/1.fc26/noarch/python3-dnf-2.1.0-1.fc26.noarch.rpm
 
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/yum/3.4.3/512.fc26/noarch/yum-3.4.3-512.fc26.noarch.rpm
 
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/dnf/2.1.0/1.fc26/noarch/dnf-automatic-2.1.0-1.fc26.noarch.rpm
 
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/dnf/2.1.0/1.fc26/noarch/dnf-yum-2.1.0-1.fc26.noarch.rpm
   Transaction performed with:
  Upgraded  dnf-2.0.1-2.fc26.noarch   @rawhide
  Installed rpm-4.13.0-11.fc26.x86_64 @rawhide
   Packages Altered:
  Upgraded dnf-2.0.1-2.fc26.noarch   @rawhide
  Upgrade  2.1.0-1.fc26.noarch   @@commandline
  Upgraded dnf-automatic-2.0.1-2.fc26.noarch @rawhide
  Upgrade2.1.0-1.fc26.noarch @@commandline
  Upgraded dnf-conf-2.0.1-2.fc26.noarch  @rawhide
  Upgrade   2.1.0-1.fc26.noarch  @@commandline
  Upgraded dnf-yum-2.0.1-2.fc26.noarch   @rawhide
  Upgrade  2.1.0-1.fc26.noarch   @@commandline
  Upgraded python2-dnf-2.0.1-2.fc26.noarch   @rawhide
  Upgrade  2.1.0-1.fc26.noarch   @@commandline
  Upgraded python3-dnf-2.0.1-2.fc26.noarch   @rawhide
  Upgrade  2.1.0-1.fc26.noarch   @@commandline
  Upgraded yum-3.4.3-511.fc26.noarch @@commandline/rawhide
  Upgrade  3.4.3-512.fc26.noarch @@commandline

> # dnf install ./dnf-2.1.0-1.fc26.noarch.rpm 
> ./python3-dnf-2.1.0-1.fc26.noarch.rpm --allowerasing

I try to stay away from  "allowerasing" -- once I had to go through a 
massive rpm-fu work. It was fun but time consuming.

-- 
Viorel
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Moan about dnf on Rawhide

2017-02-19 Thread GERHARD GOETZHABER 
First, I had the same problems as Stan, and the whole secret is calling 
DNF for both RPMs strictly together in one single command:


So said you've stored the files in the directory /temp your command will 
be "dnf install /temp/dnf-2.1.0-1.fc26.noarch.rpm 
/temp/python3-dnf-2.1.0-1.fc26.noarch.rpm --allowerasing", but best of 
all will be first going to /temp (or wherever your RPMs are staying) by 
cd and from therein just executing "dnf install 
{,python3-}dnf-2.1.0-1.fc26.noarch.rpm --allowerasing"!



On 2/19/17 5:50 PM, stan wrote:

On Sat, 18 Feb 2017 14:03:45 +0100
GERHARD GOETZHABER  wrote:


To make it clear:

1. Just download dnf-2.1.0-1.fc26.noarch.rpm and
python3-dnf-2.1.0-1.fc26.noarch.rpm from
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/dnf/2.1.0/1.fc26/noarch/
(these two files only)

2. # dnf install dnf-2.1.0-1.fc26.noarch.rpm
python3-dnf-2.1.0-1.fc26.noarch.rpm --allowerasing
  (According dnf-automatic, dnf-conf and dnf-yum will get
installed within!)

All done - happy days are here again!  : )

Not here.  I tried all kinds of variations of the above, and I keep
getting errors.  Command 2 above gives these errors:

# dnf
install ./dnf-2.1.0-1.fc26.noarch.rpm ./python3-dnf-2.1.0-1.fc26.noarch.rpm
--allowerasing Last metadata expiration check: 0:46:45 ago on Sun Feb
19 08:23:34 2017 MST. Error: Problem 1: conflicting requests
   - nothing provides dnf-conf = 2.1.0-1.fc26 needed by
python3-dnf-2.1.0-1.fc26.noarch Problem 2: package
dnf-2.1.0-1.fc26.noarch requires python3-dnf = 2.1.0-1.fc26, but none
of the providers can be installed
   - conflicting requests
   - nothing provides dnf-conf = 2.1.0-1.fc26 needed by
 python3-dnf-2.1.0-1.fc26.noarch

When I fix that by putting in dnf-conf, it wants to remove 166
packages.  That doesn't seem reasonable; shouldn't those packages be
updated to allow them to update also?  I'd post the output, but dnf is
seg faulting every time now.

When I try to use rpm to Update dnf and python3-dnf, it errors out
with the following:

# rpm -U ./dnf-2.1.0-1.fc26.noarch.rpm ./python3-dnf-2.1.0-1.fc26.noarch.rpm 
./dnf-conf-2.1.0-1.fc26.noarch.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
 dnf = 2.0.0-0.rc2.5.fc26 is needed by (installed) 
dnf-yum-2.0.0-0.rc2.5.fc26.noarch
 python3-hawkey >= 0.7.1 is needed by python3-dnf-2.1.0-1.fc26.noarch
 system-python(abi) = 3.6 is needed by python3-dnf-2.1.0-1.fc26.noarch
 dnf-conf = 2.0.0-0.rc2.5.fc26 is needed by (installed) 
python2-dnf-2.0.0-0.rc2.5.fc26.noarch

When I search in koji, the latest version of python3-hawkey is
python3-hawkey-0.6.3-6.2.fc25.x86_64.rpm.  I can't find a
python3-hawkey for fc26 in koji.  How can this update ever succeed if
its dependencies can't be met?  And how did this update get built?

So, I forced the install of the new dnf using rpm.  And now I get the
following error when I try to run dnf:

# dnf
Traceback (most recent call last):
   File "/usr/bin/dnf", line 57, in 
 from dnf.cli import main
ImportError: No module named 'dnf'

Is BFO working for rawhide again?  The last time I tried to use it to
install rawhide, it just ignored the command and returned to the menu.
But that was around the time that f25 was splitting from rawhide.

As the other poster said, dnf is a very special component of fedora, so
it should be handled very carefully.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Moan about dnf on Rawhide

2017-02-19 Thread stan 
On Sun, 19 Feb 2017 09:50:24 -0700
stan  wrote:

> On Sat, 18 Feb 2017 14:03:45 +0100
> GERHARD GOETZHABER  wrote:
> 
> > To make it clear:
> > 
> > 1. Just download dnf-2.1.0-1.fc26.noarch.rpm and 
> > python3-dnf-2.1.0-1.fc26.noarch.rpm from 
> > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/dnf/2.1.0/1.fc26/noarch/ 
> > (these two files only)
> > 
> > 2. # dnf install dnf-2.1.0-1.fc26.noarch.rpm 
> > python3-dnf-2.1.0-1.fc26.noarch.rpm --allowerasing
> >  (According dnf-automatic, dnf-conf and dnf-yum will get
> > installed within!)
> > 
> > All done - happy days are here again!  : )  
> 
> Not here.  I tried all kinds of variations of the above, and I keep
> getting errors.  Command 2 above gives these errors:

[snip]

> So, I forced the install of the new dnf using rpm.  And now I get the
> following error when I try to run dnf:
> 
> # dnf
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File "/usr/bin/dnf", line 57, in 
> from dnf.cli import main
> ImportError: No module named 'dnf'

I downgraded to the last version of dnf that uses the python 3.5 ABI,
and dnf works again, with occasional segfaults.  But it won't update
anything because there are too many conflicts with going to python
3.6.  How is this not python 4?  If the ABI changes so much between 3.5
and 3.6 that they are backward incompatible, then it isn't python3
any more.  What are the python developers thinking?

I ran a dnf --best update and there are 317 errors, and dnf skips
everything.  :-)  

Most of the errors are related to the 3.6 ABI update, and packages that
aren't upgraded yet.  They propagate back up the libsolv chain, and
prevent everything else from updating.

I suppose I'll be forced to --allowerasing if I want to do a dnf
update.  Or force install the dnf dependencies of the new 3.6 ABI so I
can then run dnf update and have it update everything else.

What a mess.  Maybe a new install of rawhide would be easier.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Moan about dnf on Rawhide

2017-02-19 Thread Adam Williamson 
On Sun, 2017-02-19 at 07:05 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 02/19/2017 02:13 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Sat, 2017-02-18 at 05:43 +, Russel Winder wrote:
> > > This has been happening for a while now. Given that dnf is so critical
> > > to updating Rawhide I would not have expected this to be the case.
> > 
> > It was in fact fixed a while ago (as Viorel explained). But Rawhide
> > packages only appear in the repository after a successful Rawhide
> > compose,
> 
> Why?

Because that's how the process works. Basically, because signing and
mashing happen as part of the compose; the way Fedora repos work you
can't simply take the output of Koji and stuff it straight into the
repository. Apply to releng for more details.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Moan about dnf on Rawhide

2017-02-19 Thread stan 
On Sat, 18 Feb 2017 14:03:45 +0100
GERHARD GOETZHABER  wrote:

> To make it clear:
> 
> 1. Just download dnf-2.1.0-1.fc26.noarch.rpm and 
> python3-dnf-2.1.0-1.fc26.noarch.rpm from 
> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/dnf/2.1.0/1.fc26/noarch/ 
> (these two files only)
> 
> 2. # dnf install dnf-2.1.0-1.fc26.noarch.rpm 
> python3-dnf-2.1.0-1.fc26.noarch.rpm --allowerasing
>  (According dnf-automatic, dnf-conf and dnf-yum will get
> installed within!)
> 
> All done - happy days are here again!  : )

Not here.  I tried all kinds of variations of the above, and I keep
getting errors.  Command 2 above gives these errors:

# dnf
install ./dnf-2.1.0-1.fc26.noarch.rpm ./python3-dnf-2.1.0-1.fc26.noarch.rpm
--allowerasing Last metadata expiration check: 0:46:45 ago on Sun Feb
19 08:23:34 2017 MST. Error: Problem 1: conflicting requests
  - nothing provides dnf-conf = 2.1.0-1.fc26 needed by
python3-dnf-2.1.0-1.fc26.noarch Problem 2: package
dnf-2.1.0-1.fc26.noarch requires python3-dnf = 2.1.0-1.fc26, but none
of the providers can be installed
  - conflicting requests
  - nothing provides dnf-conf = 2.1.0-1.fc26 needed by
python3-dnf-2.1.0-1.fc26.noarch

When I fix that by putting in dnf-conf, it wants to remove 166
packages.  That doesn't seem reasonable; shouldn't those packages be
updated to allow them to update also?  I'd post the output, but dnf is
seg faulting every time now.

When I try to use rpm to Update dnf and python3-dnf, it errors out
with the following:

# rpm -U ./dnf-2.1.0-1.fc26.noarch.rpm ./python3-dnf-2.1.0-1.fc26.noarch.rpm 
./dnf-conf-2.1.0-1.fc26.noarch.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
dnf = 2.0.0-0.rc2.5.fc26 is needed by (installed) 
dnf-yum-2.0.0-0.rc2.5.fc26.noarch
python3-hawkey >= 0.7.1 is needed by python3-dnf-2.1.0-1.fc26.noarch
system-python(abi) = 3.6 is needed by python3-dnf-2.1.0-1.fc26.noarch
dnf-conf = 2.0.0-0.rc2.5.fc26 is needed by (installed) 
python2-dnf-2.0.0-0.rc2.5.fc26.noarch

When I search in koji, the latest version of python3-hawkey is
python3-hawkey-0.6.3-6.2.fc25.x86_64.rpm.  I can't find a
python3-hawkey for fc26 in koji.  How can this update ever succeed if
its dependencies can't be met?  And how did this update get built?

So, I forced the install of the new dnf using rpm.  And now I get the
following error when I try to run dnf:

# dnf
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/bin/dnf", line 57, in 
from dnf.cli import main
ImportError: No module named 'dnf'

Is BFO working for rawhide again?  The last time I tried to use it to
install rawhide, it just ignored the command and returned to the menu.
But that was around the time that f25 was splitting from rawhide.

As the other poster said, dnf is a very special component of fedora, so
it should be handled very carefully.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org