Re: Slow display manager on Fedora 29 Workstation - am I the only one who's seeing this?
What version of selinux-policy do you have? Make sure it's at least selinux-policy-3.14.2-34.fc29. Dne pá 14. 9. 2018 8:03 uživatel Aleksandar Kurtakov napsal: > > On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 8:25 AM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky > wrote: > >> I've got a workstation that I'm testing with Fedora 29 Workstation. I >> installed it over the network using the "everything boot" network >> installer. Relative to other Linux systems, including Silverblue 28, >> the system takes a long time to display the GDM greeter, and once I >> log in, it takes a long time to come up with a desktop. >> >> This machine has an AMD "Bonaire" GPU and I've had plenty of kernel >> and Wayland / X issues with it over the years, so my first guess is >> that this is kernel / GPU related and not something everyone is >> seeing. But before I go collecting log files I'm curious if other >> people are seeing this. >> > > I experience this kind of slowness too (Intel). > > >> >> -- >> >> Markovs of the world, unite! You have nothing to lose but your chains! >> ___ >> test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org >> To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org >> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html >> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines >> List Archives: >> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org >> > > > > -- > Alexander Kurtakov > Red Hat Eclipse Team > ___ > test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org > ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Slow display manager on Fedora 29 Workstation - am I the only one who's seeing this?
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 8:25 AM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote: > I've got a workstation that I'm testing with Fedora 29 Workstation. I > installed it over the network using the "everything boot" network > installer. Relative to other Linux systems, including Silverblue 28, > the system takes a long time to display the GDM greeter, and once I > log in, it takes a long time to come up with a desktop. > > This machine has an AMD "Bonaire" GPU and I've had plenty of kernel > and Wayland / X issues with it over the years, so my first guess is > that this is kernel / GPU related and not something everyone is > seeing. But before I go collecting log files I'm curious if other > people are seeing this. > I experience this kind of slowness too (Intel). > > -- > > Markovs of the world, unite! You have nothing to lose but your chains! > ___ > test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists. > fedoraproject.org > -- Alexander Kurtakov Red Hat Eclipse Team ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Slow display manager on Fedora 29 Workstation - am I the only one who's seeing this?
I've got a workstation that I'm testing with Fedora 29 Workstation. I installed it over the network using the "everything boot" network installer. Relative to other Linux systems, including Silverblue 28, the system takes a long time to display the GDM greeter, and once I log in, it takes a long time to come up with a desktop. This machine has an AMD "Bonaire" GPU and I've had plenty of kernel and Wayland / X issues with it over the years, so my first guess is that this is kernel / GPU related and not something everyone is seeing. But before I go collecting log files I'm curious if other people are seeing this. -- Markovs of the world, unite! You have nothing to lose but your chains! ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Rawhide-20180913.n.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 14/132 (x86_64), 4/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180912.n.0): ID: 279381 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/279381 ID: 279384 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/279384 ID: 279387 Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/279387 ID: 279441 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/279441 Old failures (same test failed in Rawhide-20180912.n.0): ID: 279369 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_live URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/279369 ID: 279370 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/279370 ID: 279371 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/279371 ID: 279385 Test: i386 Workstation-live-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/279385 ID: 279396 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/279396 ID: 279402 Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/279402 ID: 279420 Test: x86_64 universal install_european_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/279420 ID: 279421 Test: x86_64 universal install_cyrillic_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/279421 ID: 279422 Test: x86_64 universal install_arabic_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/279422 ID: 279423 Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/279423 ID: 279463 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/279463 ID: 279464 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_encrypted_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/279464 ID: 279474 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_encrypted_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/279474 ID: 279484 Test: i386 universal upgrade_2_desktop_32bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/279484 ID: 279485 Test: i386 universal upgrade_desktop_32bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/279485 Soft failed openQA tests: 1/132 (x86_64), 2/24 (i386) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Rawhide-20180912.n.0): ID: 279364 Test: i386 Server-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/279364 ID: 279365 Test: i386 Server-dvd-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/279365 ID: 279443 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/279443 Passed openQA tests: 108/132 (x86_64), 18/24 (i386) New passes (same test did not pass in Rawhide-20180912.n.0): ID: 279399 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_update_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/279399 ID: 279428 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_btrfs@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/279428 ID: 279429 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_no_swap@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/279429 ID: 279430 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_xfs@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/279430 ID: 279449 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_ext3@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/279449 ID: 279450 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_software_raid@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/279450 ID: 279451 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_lvmthin@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/279451 Skipped openQA tests: 10 of 158 Installed system changes in test x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default: 2 packages(s) removed since previous compose: python3-librepo, python3-smartcols System load changed from 1.16 to 1.51 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/278753#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/279338#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi: 2 packages(s) removed since previous compose: python3-librepo, python3-smartcols Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/278754#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/279339#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default_upload: Used mem changed from 169 MiB to 198 MiB Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/278756#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/279341#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi:
Fedora rawhide compose report: 20180913.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20180912.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20180913.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 3 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 53 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 371.45 KiB Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded packages: 2.93 GiB Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: -102.17 MiB Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B = ADDED IMAGES = = DROPPED IMAGES = = ADDED PACKAGES = Package: python-outcome-1.0.0-1.fc30 Summary: Capture the outcome of Python function calls RPMs:python3-outcome Size:21.05 KiB Package: roca-detect-1.2.12-4.fc30 Summary: Key fingerprinting tools for CVE-2017-15361 RPMs:roca-detect Size:317.63 KiB Package: rust-quickcheck0.6-0.6.2-2.fc30 Summary: Automatic property based testing with shrinking RPMs:rust-quickcheck0.6-devel Size:32.77 KiB = DROPPED PACKAGES = = UPGRADED PACKAGES = Package: annobin-8.33-1.fc30 Old package: annobin-8.32-1.fc30 Summary: Binary annotation plugin for GCC RPMs: annobin Size: 1.00 MiB Size change: 21.56 KiB Changelog: * Wed Sep 12 2018 Nick Clifton - 8.33-1 - Add timing tool to report on speed of the checks. - Add check for conflicting use of the -fshort-enum option. - Add check of the GNU Property notes. - Skip check for -O2 if compiled with -Og. (#1624162) Package: attr-2.4.48-4.fc30 Old package: attr-2.4.48-3.fc29 Summary: Utilities for managing filesystem extended attributes RPMs: attr libattr libattr-devel Size: 589.79 KiB Size change: -20.74 KiB Changelog: * Fri Aug 31 2018 Filipe Brandenburger 2.4.48-4 - Switch compatibility functions back to syscall() to prevent issue in interaction with fakechroot (https://github.com/dex4er/fakechroot/issues/57) Package: bakefile-0.2.11-3.fc30 Old package: bakefile-0.2.11-2.fc29 Summary: A cross-platform, cross-compiler native makefiles generator RPMs: bakefile Size: 1.31 MiB Size change: -7.87 KiB Changelog: * Thu Sep 13 2018 Scott Talbert - 0.2.11-3 - Indicate that we don't want to bytecompile the extra python files Package: clang-7.0.0-0.11.rc3.fc30 Old package: clang-7.0.0-0.10.rc2.fc30 Summary: A C language family front-end for LLVM RPMs: clang clang-analyzer clang-devel clang-libs clang-tools-extra git-clang-format llvm-test-suite python2-clang Size: 1.10 GiB Size change: 6.01 KiB Changelog: * Wed Sep 12 2018 Tom Stellard - 7.0.0-0.11.rc3 - 7.0.0-rc3 Release Package: ecj-1:4.9-1.fc30 Old package: ecj-1:4.7.3a-2.fc29 Summary: Eclipse Compiler for Java RPMs: ecj Size: 2.58 MiB Size change: 33.09 KiB Changelog: * Wed Sep 12 2018 Mat Booth - 1:4.9-1 - Update to latest release - Amend license tag Package: eclipse-cdt-2:9.5.3-1.fc30 Old package: eclipse-cdt-1:9.6.0-0.1.fc30 Summary: Eclipse C/C++ Development Tools (CDT) plugin RPMs: eclipse-cdt eclipse-cdt-arduino eclipse-cdt-docker eclipse-cdt-llvm eclipse-cdt-native eclipse-cdt-parsers eclipse-cdt-qt eclipse-cdt-sdk eclipse-cdt-tests Size: 417.99 MiB Size change: -40.96 KiB Changelog: * Wed Sep 12 2018 Mat Booth - 2:9.5.3-1 - Update to latest release and correct version number Package: eclipse-dtp-1.14.102-1.fc30 Old package: eclipse-dtp-1.14.101-1.fc30 Summary: Eclipse Data Tools Platform RPMs: eclipse-dtp Size: 12.80 MiB Size change: 416 B Changelog: * Wed Sep 12 2018 Mat Booth - 1.14.102-1 - Update to latest release - Amend license tag Package: eclipse-linuxtools-7.1.0-0.3.fc30 Old package: eclipse-linuxtools-7.1.0-0.2.fc30 Summary: Linux specific Eclipse plugins RPMs: eclipse-linuxtools eclipse-linuxtools-changelog eclipse-linuxtools-docker eclipse-linuxtools-gcov eclipse-linuxtools-gprof eclipse-linuxtools-javadocs eclipse-linuxtools-libhover eclipse-linuxtools-manpage eclipse-linuxtools-oprofile eclipse-linuxtools-perf eclipse-linuxtools-rpm-editor eclipse-linuxtools-systemtap eclipse-linuxtools-tests eclipse-linuxtools-vagrant eclipse-linuxtools-valgrind Size: 22.93 MiB Size change: 669.26 KiB Changelog: * Wed Sep 12 2018 Mat Booth - 7.1.0-0.3 - Update to latest snapshot Package: eclipse-m2e-core-1.9.1-2.fc30 Old package: eclipse-m2e-core-1.9.1-0.1.fc30 Summary: Maven integration for Eclipse RPMs: eclipse-m2e-core eclipse-m2e-core-javadoc eclipse-m2e-core-tests Size: 4.16 MiB Size change: 5.40 KiB Changelog: * Wed Sep 12 2018 Mat Booth - 1.9.1-1 - Update to latest release * Wed Sep 12 2018 Mat Booth - 1.9.1-2 - Add BR/R on maven-wagon-http Package: eclipse-photran-9.2.0-1.fc30 Old package: eclipse-photran-9.1.4-2.fc29 Summary: Fortran Development Tools (Photran) for Eclipse RPMs: eclipse-ph
F29-armfhp does tracer work?
I did the dnf update from testing-updates that updated ~130 rpms. I then installed tracer and ran it. It did report anything. Does it not work or is it that I installed tracer after the update? Perhaps tracer should be part of the base install? thanks ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Heads up: today's rawhide and F29 updates-testing break gnome-shell login
Hi all, It turns out mozjs60 60.2.0 (in F29 updates-testing and rawhide) silently broke ABI and that broke gjs that gnome-shell uses. I've rebuilt gjs; if you've already updated and can't log in, then gjs-1.54.0-3.fc29 and gjs-1.54.0-3.fc30 should help. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-bc166c0e29 has the rebuilt gjs. Hope this helps someone, Kalev ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
F29 and BZ 1627963
Hi, I've filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1627963 against F28 and I've tested the latest kernel 4.18.7-200 from koji. It is still the case where the latest builds of the kernel breaks some mice. The buttons work, but no cursor movement. I've not been able to test this on F29 but I suspect it won't be fixed there either. Should this be considered a blocker? -- Cardinal Rule of Presentations: "Tell them what you are going to tell them, tell them, then tell them what you told them." signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: F29-armhfp - updates-testing updates
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 1:16 AM Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > Should I install updates from the updates-testing repo on my Cubieboard2 > Xfce setup at this time? > > Is there something there that I could check out? I don't see anything > there connected to what I am currently doing. But then I may not know > what impacts what. If fact I know I don't know! Yes, we enable updates-testing on all pre-release releases to ensure the updates get the widest testing possible so please do install them. ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
