Re: Trying a upgrade from 29 to 30

2019-02-20 Thread Adam Williamson 
On Wed, 2019-02-20 at 20:04 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-02-20 at 10:27 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > I'd wait for at least a few days for things to settle down. Since the
> > branching finished only a few hours ago, there probably hasn't been
> > even an attempted compose for fedora 30. Until that happens, the
> > repositories for fedora 30 might as well not even exist (not sure how
> > that's actually handled by releng).
> 
> you can check here : 
> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/branched/  
> The yetarday compose DOOMED and the compose of today is not finish yet
> , maybe in 4 hours will finish , after that we need to wait for mirrors
> get synced another 12 hours ... 

Right now trying to upgrade to '30' is probably still getting you
Rawhide, and upgrading to Rawhide I think has known issues with modular
repos (I think nirik or patrick mentioned something about this, I
forget the details).
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Trying a upgrade from 29 to 30

2019-02-20 Thread Sérgio Basto 
On Wed, 2019-02-20 at 10:27 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> I'd wait for at least a few days for things to settle down. Since the
> branching finished only a few hours ago, there probably hasn't been
> even an attempted compose for fedora 30. Until that happens, the
> repositories for fedora 30 might as well not even exist (not sure how
> that's actually handled by releng).

you can check here : 
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/branched/  
The yetarday compose DOOMED and the compose of today is not finish yet
, maybe in 4 hours will finish , after that we need to wait for mirrors
get synced another 12 hours ... 



-- Sérgio M. B.

___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Trying a upgrade from 29 to 30

2019-02-20 Thread Sérgio Basto 

https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/30/ still
empty , you need wait for a message with "Fedora 30 ... compose check
report" 


On Wed, 2019-02-20 at 09:51 +0100, Ludovic Hirlimann wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> 
> According to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/30/Schedule 30
> has
> been branched. So time for me to upgrade from 29 so I can report
> issue
> with the way I use fedora.
> 
> 
> I'm using https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DNF_system_upgrade to
> upgrade.
> 
> Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'luminoso-Signal-Desktop',
> ignoring
> this repo.
> Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'athmane-gns3-extra', ignoring
> this
> repo.
> Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'rpmfusion-free-updates',
> ignoring
> this repo.
> Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'rpmfusion-free', ignoring this
> repo.
> Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'rpmfusion-nonfree-updates',
> ignoring this repo.
> Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'rpmfusion-nonfree', ignoring
> this
> repo.
> Modular dependency problems:
> 
>  Problem 1: conflicting requests
>   - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module
> avocado:stable:3020190213205848:a5b0195c-0.x86_64
>  Problem 2: conflicting requests
>   - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module
> bat:latest:3020190214090936:e50d0d19-0.x86_64
>  Problem 3: conflicting requests
>   - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module
> dwm:6.1:3020190213215420:a5b0195c-0.x86_64
>  Problem 4: conflicting requests
>   - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module
> exa:latest:3020190214120734:e50d0d19-0.x86_64
>  Problem 5: conflicting requests
>   - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module
> fish:3:3020190216163513:602da195-0.x86_64
>  Problem 6: conflicting requests
>   - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module
> gimp:2.10:20181223154246:a5b0195c-0.x86_64
>  Problem 7: conflicting requests
>   - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module
> libgit2:0.27:3020190128145600:a5b0195c-0.x86_64
>  Problem 8: conflicting requests
>   - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module
> meson:latest:3020190123223713:36245242-0.x86_64
>  Problem 9: conflicting requests
>   - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module
> ninja:latest:3020190131012415:a5b0195c-0.x86_64
>  Problem 10: conflicting requests
>   - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module
> ripgrep:latest:3020190214090003:a5b0195c-0.x86_64
>  Problem 11: conflicting requests
>   - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module
> standard-test-roles:3.0:3020190214144451:a5b0195c-0.x86_64
>  Problem 12: conflicting requests
>   - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module
> stratis:1:20181215204600:a5b0195c-0.x86_64
> Error:
>  Problem 1: package libibcm-16.2-3.fc28.x86_64 requires
> rdma-core(x86-64) = 16.2-3.fc28, but none of the providers can be
> installed
>   - rdma-core-16.2-3.fc28.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade
> repository
>   - problem with installed package libibcm-16.2-3.fc28.x86_64
>  Problem 2: package libopenshot-0.2.2-1.fc29.x86_64 requires
> libMagickCore-6.Q16.so.5()(64bit), but none of the providers can be
> installed
>   - package libopenshot-0.2.2-1.fc29.x86_64 requires
> libMagickWand-6.Q16.so.5()(64bit), but none of the providers can be
> installed
>   - ImageMagick-libs-1:6.9.9.38-3.fc29.x86_64 does not belong to a
> distupgrade repository
>   - problem with installed package libopenshot-0.2.2-1.fc29.x86_64
>  Problem 3: package rpmfusion-free-release-29-1.noarch requires
> system-release(29), but none of the providers can be installed
>   - fedora-release-29-7.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade
> repository
>   - problem with installed package rpmfusion-free-release-29-1.noarch
>  Problem 4: package vlc-core-1:3.0.6-16.fc29.x86_64 requires
> libprotobuf-lite.so.15()(64bit), but none of the providers can be
> installed
>   - protobuf-lite-3.5.0-8.fc29.x86_64 does not belong to a
> distupgrade
> repository
>   - problem with installed package vlc-core-1:3.0.6-16.fc29.x86_64
>  Problem 5: package fedora-release-29-7.noarch requires fedora-
> repos(29)
> > = 1, but none of the providers can be installed
> 
>   - package rpmfusion-nonfree-release-29-1.noarch requires
> system-release(29), but none of the providers can be installed
>   - fedora-repos-29-2.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade
> repository
>   - problem with installed package rpmfusion-nonfree-release-29-
> 1.noarch
>  Problem 6: problem with installed package blender-1:2.79b-
> 9.fc29.x86_64
>   - package blender-1:2.79b-10.fc30.x86_64 requires
> libboost_locale.so.1.66.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be
> installed
>   - boost-locale-1.66.0-14.fc29.x86_64 does not belong to a
> distupgrade
> repository
>   - blender-1:2.79b-9.fc29.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade
> repository
>  Problem 7: problem with installed package darktable-2.6.0-
> 2.fc29.x86_64
>   - package

Re: for system-upgrade to branched f30, do i need yum/yum-utils?

2019-02-20 Thread Samuel Sieb 

On 2/20/19 3:47 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:

   now, i haven't used yum for quite some time, i stick with dnf, and
it seems that:

   1) yum is required only by yum-utils
   2) yum-utils is required by nothing on my current system

so it *seems* that i have no apparent for either yum or yum-utils. is
this a safe assumption?


Yes.  Did you try adding the --allowerasing?
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: "nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module ..."

2019-02-20 Thread Robert P. J. Day 
On Wed, 20 Feb 2019, Lukas Ruzicka wrote:

> I know that fish module can be installed on Fedora Rawhide, but I
> have seen that many modules still require Platform29 and cannot be
> installed. Your errors say that Platform30 is required, my shot is
> that maybe that it may be caused by the fact that your Fedora still
> is not a 30 but Rawhide. Perhaps waiting a couple of days until the
> branch is finished might help. But I am just guessing. CCing Contyk
> to this discussion.

  that's the impression i got from further reading ... just relax for
a day or two and try again.

rday

-- 


Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
  http://crashcourse.ca/dokuwiki

Twitter:   http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn:   http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday

___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: "nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module ..."

2019-02-20 Thread Lukas Ruzicka 
I know that fish module can be installed on Fedora Rawhide, but I have seen
that many modules still require Platform29 and cannot be installed.
Your errors say that Platform30 is required, my shot is that maybe that it
may be caused by the fact that your Fedora still is not a 30 but Rawhide.
Perhaps waiting a couple of days until the branch is finished might help.
But I am just guessing.
CCing Contyk to this discussion.

On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 2:14 PM Robert P. J. Day 
wrote:

>
>   attempt at upgrading this morning produced pretty much line for line
> this error reported two days ago by paul destefano:
>
>   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1661955
>
>
> Modular dependency problems:
>
>  Problem 1: conflicting requests
>   - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module
> fish:3:3020190216163513:602da195-0.x86_64
>  Problem 2: conflicting requests
>   - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module
> fish:3:3020190116191836:602da195-0.x86_64
>  Problem 3: conflicting requests
>
> ... etc etc ...
>
>   open to suggestions.
>
> rday
>
> --
>
> 
> Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
>   http://crashcourse.ca/dokuwiki
>
> Twitter:   http://twitter.com/rpjday
> LinkedIn:   http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
> 
> ___
> test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
>


-- 

Lukáš Růžička

FEDORA QE, RHCE

Red Hat



Purkyňova 115

612 45 Brno - Královo Pole

lruzi...@redhat.com
TRIED AND PERSONALLY TESTED, ERGO TRUSTED. 
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

"nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module ..."

2019-02-20 Thread Robert P. J. Day 

  attempt at upgrading this morning produced pretty much line for line
this error reported two days ago by paul destefano:

  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1661955


Modular dependency problems:

 Problem 1: conflicting requests
  - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module
fish:3:3020190216163513:602da195-0.x86_64
 Problem 2: conflicting requests
  - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module
fish:3:3020190116191836:602da195-0.x86_64
 Problem 3: conflicting requests

... etc etc ...

  open to suggestions.

rday

-- 


Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
  http://crashcourse.ca/dokuwiki

Twitter:   http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn:   http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday

___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

for system-upgrade to branched f30, do i need yum/yum-utils?

2019-02-20 Thread Robert P. J. Day 

  following along here:

  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DNF_system_upgrade

already ran:

  $ sudo dnf upgrade --refresh

and when running:

  $ sudo dnf system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever=30

i get a pile of diagnostics, including (at the very bottom):

Error:
 Problem: problem with installed package yum-3.4.3-518.fc29.noarch
  - package dnf-yum-4.1.0-1.fc30.noarch conflicts with yum provided by
yum-3.4.3-521.fc30.noarch
  - problem with installed package dnf-yum-4.0.9-2.fc29.noarch
  - yum-3.4.3-518.fc29.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade
repository
  - dnf-yum-4.0.9-2.fc29.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade
repository
(try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting
packages or '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages)

  now, i haven't used yum for quite some time, i stick with dnf, and
it seems that:

  1) yum is required only by yum-utils
  2) yum-utils is required by nothing on my current system

so it *seems* that i have no apparent for either yum or yum-utils. is
this a safe assumption?

rday

-- 


Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
  http://crashcourse.ca/dokuwiki

Twitter:   http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn:   http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday

___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Trying a upgrade from 29 to 30

2019-02-20 Thread Fabio Valentini 
On Wed, Feb 20, 2019, 09:52 Ludovic Hirlimann  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
>
> According to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/30/Schedule 30 has
> been branched. So time for me to upgrade from 29 so I can report issue
> with the way I use fedora.
>
>
> I'm using https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DNF_system_upgrade to upgrade.
>
> Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'luminoso-Signal-Desktop', ignoring
> this repo.
> Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'athmane-gns3-extra', ignoring this
> repo.
> Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'rpmfusion-free-updates', ignoring
> this repo.
> Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'rpmfusion-free', ignoring this repo.
> Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'rpmfusion-nonfree-updates',
> ignoring this repo.
> Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'rpmfusion-nonfree', ignoring this
> repo.
> Modular dependency problems:
>
>  Problem 1: conflicting requests
>   - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module
> avocado:stable:3020190213205848:a5b0195c-0.x86_64
>  Problem 2: conflicting requests
>   - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module
> bat:latest:3020190214090936:e50d0d19-0.x86_64
>  Problem 3: conflicting requests
>   - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module
> dwm:6.1:3020190213215420:a5b0195c-0.x86_64
>  Problem 4: conflicting requests
>   - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module
> exa:latest:3020190214120734:e50d0d19-0.x86_64
>  Problem 5: conflicting requests
>   - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module
> fish:3:3020190216163513:602da195-0.x86_64
>  Problem 6: conflicting requests
>   - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module
> gimp:2.10:20181223154246:a5b0195c-0.x86_64
>  Problem 7: conflicting requests
>   - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module
> libgit2:0.27:3020190128145600:a5b0195c-0.x86_64
>  Problem 8: conflicting requests
>   - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module
> meson:latest:3020190123223713:36245242-0.x86_64
>  Problem 9: conflicting requests
>   - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module
> ninja:latest:3020190131012415:a5b0195c-0.x86_64
>  Problem 10: conflicting requests
>   - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module
> ripgrep:latest:3020190214090003:a5b0195c-0.x86_64
>  Problem 11: conflicting requests
>   - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module
> standard-test-roles:3.0:3020190214144451:a5b0195c-0.x86_64
>  Problem 12: conflicting requests
>   - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module
> stratis:1:20181215204600:a5b0195c-0.x86_64
> Error:
>  Problem 1: package libibcm-16.2-3.fc28.x86_64 requires
> rdma-core(x86-64) = 16.2-3.fc28, but none of the providers can be installed
>   - rdma-core-16.2-3.fc28.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade
> repository
>   - problem with installed package libibcm-16.2-3.fc28.x86_64
>  Problem 2: package libopenshot-0.2.2-1.fc29.x86_64 requires
> libMagickCore-6.Q16.so.5()(64bit), but none of the providers can be
> installed
>   - package libopenshot-0.2.2-1.fc29.x86_64 requires
> libMagickWand-6.Q16.so.5()(64bit), but none of the providers can be
> installed
>   - ImageMagick-libs-1:6.9.9.38-3.fc29.x86_64 does not belong to a
> distupgrade repository
>   - problem with installed package libopenshot-0.2.2-1.fc29.x86_64
>  Problem 3: package rpmfusion-free-release-29-1.noarch requires
> system-release(29), but none of the providers can be installed
>   - fedora-release-29-7.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository
>   - problem with installed package rpmfusion-free-release-29-1.noarch
>  Problem 4: package vlc-core-1:3.0.6-16.fc29.x86_64 requires
> libprotobuf-lite.so.15()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
>   - protobuf-lite-3.5.0-8.fc29.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade
> repository
>   - problem with installed package vlc-core-1:3.0.6-16.fc29.x86_64
>  Problem 5: package fedora-release-29-7.noarch requires fedora-repos(29)
> >= 1, but none of the providers can be installed
>   - package rpmfusion-nonfree-release-29-1.noarch requires
> system-release(29), but none of the providers can be installed
>   - fedora-repos-29-2.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository
>   - problem with installed package rpmfusion-nonfree-release-29-1.noarch
>  Problem 6: problem with installed package blender-1:2.79b-9.fc29.x86_64
>   - package blender-1:2.79b-10.fc30.x86_64 requires
> libboost_locale.so.1.66.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be
> installed
>   - boost-locale-1.66.0-14.fc29.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade
> repository
>   - blender-1:2.79b-9.fc29.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade
> repository
>  Problem 7: problem with installed package darktable-2.6.0-2.fc29.x86_64
>   - package darktable-2.6.0-2.fc30.x86_64 requires
> libexiv2.so.26()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
>   - exiv2-libs-0.26-12.fc29.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade
> repository
>   -

Trying a upgrade from 29 to 30

2019-02-20 Thread Ludovic Hirlimann 
Hi all,


According to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/30/Schedule 30 has
been branched. So time for me to upgrade from 29 so I can report issue
with the way I use fedora.


I'm using https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DNF_system_upgrade to upgrade.

Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'luminoso-Signal-Desktop', ignoring
this repo.
Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'athmane-gns3-extra', ignoring this
repo.
Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'rpmfusion-free-updates', ignoring
this repo.
Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'rpmfusion-free', ignoring this repo.
Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'rpmfusion-nonfree-updates',
ignoring this repo.
Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'rpmfusion-nonfree', ignoring this
repo.
Modular dependency problems:

 Problem 1: conflicting requests
  - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module
avocado:stable:3020190213205848:a5b0195c-0.x86_64
 Problem 2: conflicting requests
  - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module
bat:latest:3020190214090936:e50d0d19-0.x86_64
 Problem 3: conflicting requests
  - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module
dwm:6.1:3020190213215420:a5b0195c-0.x86_64
 Problem 4: conflicting requests
  - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module
exa:latest:3020190214120734:e50d0d19-0.x86_64
 Problem 5: conflicting requests
  - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module
fish:3:3020190216163513:602da195-0.x86_64
 Problem 6: conflicting requests
  - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module
gimp:2.10:20181223154246:a5b0195c-0.x86_64
 Problem 7: conflicting requests
  - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module
libgit2:0.27:3020190128145600:a5b0195c-0.x86_64
 Problem 8: conflicting requests
  - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module
meson:latest:3020190123223713:36245242-0.x86_64
 Problem 9: conflicting requests
  - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module
ninja:latest:3020190131012415:a5b0195c-0.x86_64
 Problem 10: conflicting requests
  - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module
ripgrep:latest:3020190214090003:a5b0195c-0.x86_64
 Problem 11: conflicting requests
  - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module
standard-test-roles:3.0:3020190214144451:a5b0195c-0.x86_64
 Problem 12: conflicting requests
  - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module
stratis:1:20181215204600:a5b0195c-0.x86_64
Error:
 Problem 1: package libibcm-16.2-3.fc28.x86_64 requires
rdma-core(x86-64) = 16.2-3.fc28, but none of the providers can be installed
  - rdma-core-16.2-3.fc28.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
  - problem with installed package libibcm-16.2-3.fc28.x86_64
 Problem 2: package libopenshot-0.2.2-1.fc29.x86_64 requires
libMagickCore-6.Q16.so.5()(64bit), but none of the providers can be
installed
  - package libopenshot-0.2.2-1.fc29.x86_64 requires
libMagickWand-6.Q16.so.5()(64bit), but none of the providers can be
installed
  - ImageMagick-libs-1:6.9.9.38-3.fc29.x86_64 does not belong to a
distupgrade repository
  - problem with installed package libopenshot-0.2.2-1.fc29.x86_64
 Problem 3: package rpmfusion-free-release-29-1.noarch requires
system-release(29), but none of the providers can be installed
  - fedora-release-29-7.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository
  - problem with installed package rpmfusion-free-release-29-1.noarch
 Problem 4: package vlc-core-1:3.0.6-16.fc29.x86_64 requires
libprotobuf-lite.so.15()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - protobuf-lite-3.5.0-8.fc29.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade
repository
  - problem with installed package vlc-core-1:3.0.6-16.fc29.x86_64
 Problem 5: package fedora-release-29-7.noarch requires fedora-repos(29)
>= 1, but none of the providers can be installed
  - package rpmfusion-nonfree-release-29-1.noarch requires
system-release(29), but none of the providers can be installed
  - fedora-repos-29-2.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository
  - problem with installed package rpmfusion-nonfree-release-29-1.noarch
 Problem 6: problem with installed package blender-1:2.79b-9.fc29.x86_64
  - package blender-1:2.79b-10.fc30.x86_64 requires
libboost_locale.so.1.66.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be
installed
  - boost-locale-1.66.0-14.fc29.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade
repository
  - blender-1:2.79b-9.fc29.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade
repository
 Problem 7: problem with installed package darktable-2.6.0-2.fc29.x86_64
  - package darktable-2.6.0-2.fc30.x86_64 requires
libexiv2.so.26()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - exiv2-libs-0.26-12.fc29.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade
repository
  - darktable-2.6.0-2.fc29.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade
repository
 Problem 8: problem with installed package pgp-tools-2.7-3.fc29.x86_64
  - package pgp-tools-2.7-3.fc29.x86_64 requires /usr/bin/pgpring, but
none of the providers can be installed
  -