Re: self-introduction: Elizabeth Boswell
On Mon, 2019-07-08 at 13:04 +0100, E. Boswell via test wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I would like to join the Fedora QA team. Hi Elizabeth, welcome! > My name is Elizabeth Boswell and I am from Germany. I am 20 years old and > have been using Linux for approximately 10 years. Wow, an early starter :) > I have some personal experience installing various Linux operation systems > and I have completed a year of computer science at the University of > Glasgow. > My IRC nickname is eb3c0. > > I am excited about contributing to this project, thank you for considering > my application. Thanks again for joining :) I have approved your group membership. Just ask here or on IRC if there's anything we can help you with getting started! Right now we're in the early stages of the Fedora 31 cycle, the beta candidates will come in a few weeks; besides that there's always update testing and Rawhide compose testing to do. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora testing-20190710.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64) ID: 420102 Test: x86_64 AtomicHost-dvd_ostree-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/420102 ID: 420103 Test: x86_64 AtomicHost-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/420103 -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
DVD does not show up in a dvd is inserted.
I am not able to burn a dvd or cd in my player. My player shows up in bios but after start up, it can't be seen. ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Rawhide-20190709.n.1 compose check report
No missing expected images. Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check! All required tests passed Failed openQA tests: 8/147 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test not failed in Rawhide-20190707.n.0): ID: 419983 Test: x86_64 universal install_arabic_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/419983 ID: 419992 Test: x86_64 universal install_cyrillic_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/419992 Old failures (same test failed in Rawhide-20190707.n.0): ID: 419896 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_cockpit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/419896 ID: 419904 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso mediakit_repoclosure URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/419904 ID: 419910 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/419910 ID: 419928 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/419928 ID: 419936 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/419936 ID: 419953 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_update_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/419953 ID: 419957 Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/419957 Soft failed openQA tests: 5/147 (x86_64), 3/22 (i386) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) New soft failures (same test not soft failed in Rawhide-20190707.n.0): ID: 419893 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/419893 ID: 420007 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/420007 ID: 420039 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_realmd_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/420039 Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Rawhide-20190707.n.0): ID: 419919 Test: i386 Server-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/419919 ID: 419920 Test: i386 Server-dvd-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/419920 ID: 419937 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/419937 ID: 419939 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/419939 ID: 419941 Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/419941 Passed openQA tests: 134/147 (x86_64), 19/22 (i386) New passes (same test not passed in Rawhide-20190707.n.0): ID: 419930 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/419930 ID: 419950 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/419950 ID: 419951 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/419951 Skipped non-gating openQA tests: 1 of 171 Installed system changes in test x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default: 1 packages(s) added since previous compose: initscripts 1 services(s) added since previous compose: import-state.service Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/419233#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/419886#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi: 1 packages(s) added since previous compose: initscripts 1 services(s) added since previous compose: import-state.service 1 services(s) removed since previous compose: pcscd.service Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/419234#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/419887#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default_upload: Used mem changed from 198 MiB to 172 MiB Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/419240#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/419888#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi: Used mem changed from 198 MiB to 172 MiB Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/419238#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/419889#downloads Installed system changes in test i386 Server-boot-iso install_default: 1 packages(s) added since previous compose: initscripts 1 services(s) added since previous compose: import-state.service Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/419266#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/419919#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default@uefi: 1 packages(s) added since previous compose: initscripts Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/419269#downloads Current test data:
Fedora 30 Respin 20190708 compose check report
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 1/27 (x86_64) ID: 420073 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_live URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/420073 Soft failed openQA tests: 1/27 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) ID: 420061 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/420061 Passed openQA tests: 25/27 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: [Xen-devel] Criteria / validation proposal: drop Xen
On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 6:12 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2019-05-21 at 11:14 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > > > "The release must boot successfully as Xen DomU with releases > providing > > > > > > a functional, supported Xen Dom0 and widely used cloud providers > > > > > > utilizing Xen." > > > > > > > > > > > > and change the 'milestone' for the test case - > > > > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Boot_Methods_Xen_Para_Virt - > > > > > > from Final to Optional. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thoughts? Comments? Thanks! > > > > > > > > > > I would prefer for it to remain as it is. > > > > > > > > This is only practical if it's going to be tested, and tested > regularly > > > > - not *only* on the final release candidate, right before we sign off > > > > on the release. It needs to be tested regularly throughout the > release > > > > cycle, on the composes that are "nominated for testing". > > > > > > Would the proposal above work for you? I think it satisfies what you > are > > > looking for. We would also have someone who monitors these test results > > > pro-actively. > > > > In theory, yeah, but given the history here I'm somewhat sceptical. I'd > > also say we still haven't really got a convincing case for why we > > should continue to block the release (at least in theory) on Fedora > > working in Xen when we don't block on any other virt stack apart from > > our 'official' one, and we don't block on all sorts of other stuff we'd > > "like to have working" either. Regardless of the testing issues, I'd > > like to see that too if we're going to keep blocking on Xen... > > So, this died here. As things stand: I proposed removing the Xen > criterion, Lars opposed, we discussed the testing situation a bit, and > I said overall I'm still inclined to remove the criterion because > there's no clear justification for it for Fedora any more. Xen working > (or rather, Fedora working on Xen) is just not a key requirement for > Fedora at present, AFAICS. > > It's worth noting that at least part of the justification for the > criterion in the first place was that Amazon was using Xen for EC2, but > that is no longer the case, most if not all EC2 instance types no > longer use Xen. Another consideration is that there was a time when KVM > was still pretty new stuff and VirtualBox was not as popular as it is > now, and Xen was still widely used for general hobbyist virtualization > purposes; I don't believe that's really the case any more. > > So...with thanks to Lars / Xen Project for their input, I'm afraid I'm > still in favor of this proposal, and still think we should drop the Xen > criterion for F31. This wouldn't mean Xen is out of Fedora and we don't > care about it any more, or anything like that; it would still be a part > of Fedora and we still would like Xen to work on Fedora and Fedora to > work on Xen, just like any other non-release-blocking package. It just > means we would no longer block releases if it does not work. > Agreed. ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
