Re: Exciting news
On Sat, 2020-02-15 at 22:23 -0500, David wrote: > I am not the sharpest tool in the shed, but I resolved my Rawhide > update problem > all on my own. > > The trick was to first run "dnf install redhat-rpm-config" > > I think that is all there was too it. > > I installed a lot of packages manually, but I do not think that was > necessary. > > My Rawhide install now has about seventy fc33 packages. And > lots of the > anaconda packages seemed to clear out. > > Everything installed !! > > I am too scared to reboot.But probably will anyways. > > I am curious now whether my system will say I am on Fedora 33, if > it reboots successfully ?? > > David Locklear > Fedora Rawhide Novice Level 0.0.0.2 > Arcola, Texas USA > David, If you want a simple way to see exactly what kernel you're running, type: uname -a If you want to know the familiar name of the OS you are running, type: cat /etc/fedora-release If you REALLY want to get fancy, edit your /etc/bashrc file using vim or equivalent editor. Look for the following three lines about 52 lines into the file: # Turn on checkwinsizeshopt -s checkwinsize[ "$PS1" = "\\s- \\v\\\$ " ] && PS1="[\u@\h \W]\\$ " Replace the third line with this: [ "$PS1" = "\\s-\\v\\\$ " ] && PS1="\n\\033[1;31m`cat /etc/redhat- release`\n\\033[1;34m`date +%A` - `date +%B` `date +%d`, `date +%Y` \\033[0;32m\t `date +%Z`\n\033[0;36m[\u@\h:\l] \\033[1;33m\w\\033[0;37m\n\\$ " (Make sure you use back ticks rather than single quotes.) This will give you a complex colorful multi-line xterm prompt that will dress up your terminal sessions. If you like running Rawhide simply because it has a cool name, you should probably have heeded your mother's warning not to run with scissors. I've been using Fedora since its initial release, and Red Hat Linux before that. I remember the wreckage in the early days when I (ignorantly) tried installing every (!) package in what was then Rawhide. Talk about your major train wreck. I eventually learned to install development versions of Fedora (starting with the Beta release) only in a VM so any serious oops wouldn't destroy my day-to-day working files in /home. It's up to you, of course. Just a bit of no-cost advise from a long- time user to a new guy. --Doc Savage Fairview Heights, IL ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Super Exciting News
I am in Fedora 33 on hardware as my only operating system !! It is butter-smooth and fast and everything works. This is so thrilling. David Locklear Fedora Rawhide Novice Level 0.0.0.3 Arcola, Texas USA ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Exciting news
I have not rebooted yet, but if I type "inxi -F" it displays I am in Fedora 33. I lost third-party repository along the way. Rebooting now. > > David Locklear > Fedora Rawhide Novice Level 0.0.0.2 > Arcola, Texas USA > ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Exciting news
I am not the sharpest tool in the shed, but I resolved my Rawhide update problem all on my own. The trick was to first run "dnf install redhat-rpm-config" I think that is all there was too it. I installed a lot of packages manually, but I do not think that was necessary. My Rawhide install now has about seventy fc33 packages. And lots of the anaconda packages seemed to clear out. Everything installed !! I am too scared to reboot.But probably will anyways. I am curious now whether my system will say I am on Fedora 33, if it reboots successfully ?? David Locklear Fedora Rawhide Novice Level 0.0.0.2 Arcola, Texas USA ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 32 / Fedora 33
Thank you all, for answering my questions. I am using RAWHIDE on hardware as my only operating system. But I really do not yet know much about computers, and have zero knowledge of servers, coding, packaging, software differentialities, peculiarities, etc. I started off in Linux Mint, three years ago, but learned all know from Mageia 6 before it was Beta. Shout out here, to the Mageians. But I got to a point, where I felt Fedora Rawhide was my cup of tea. I just like the name ( LOL!), as sounds more cool than "Factory," or "Cauldron," or "Cooker," or whatever Neon, calls it's "Developmental Version," All I have to offer, is my perspective as a novice using Rawhide, which may rattle some people, who think that I am silly, or retarded. I would like to make a good YouTube, video showing my very limited Rawhide skills. For example, I have installed Rawhide on hardware ( same machine ) six times. The first thing I do, is run "inxi -F," and study the readout. Then I play a game of Freecell ( Aisleriot ) and Gnome Mahjongg, and compare that experience to my precious distros. And then I spend hours surfing the web, watching YouTuve videos while looking for ways to learn new things. I can should have a better computer by June, and hopefully one with a graphics card. I have never used a graphics card. I hope to never own another motherboard with Broadcom wi-fi. David Locklear ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 32 / Fedora 33
On Sat, 15 Feb 2020, David wrote: > Sometime in the past two weeks, the Rawhide updates apparently removed all > fc31 packages. > Does that sound right ? Or was it just my imagination ? There was a mass rebuild for Fedora 32 at around the end of January which should have replaced most of the fc31 packages left in fc32/rawhide. It looks like there are still some left, presumably those that failed to build for some reason. Michael Young ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 32 / Fedora 33
On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 3:31 PM David wrote: > > Sometime in the past two weeks, the Rawhide updates apparently removed all > fc31 packages. > > Does that sound right ? Or was it just my imagination ? This is from (workstation) Rawhide clean installed on Jan 26 with a nightly ISO from around then. And kept up to date (I just moments ago switched it from rawhide to fc32). I expect these will either get updated or obsolete, I'm not sure which. $ rpm -qa | grep fc31 | sort -n cogl-1.22.4-2.fc31.x86_64 fcoe-utils-1.0.32-9.git9834b34.fc31.x86_64 GConf2-3.2.6-27.fc31.x86_64 genisoimage-1.1.11-42.fc31.x86_64 keybinder3-0.3.2-7.fc31.x86_64 libqb-1.0.5-3.fc31.x86_64 libusal-1.1.11-42.fc31.x86_64 NetworkManager-openvpn-1.8.10-1.fc31.1.x86_64 NetworkManager-openvpn-gnome-1.8.10-1.fc31.1.x86_64 pinfo-0.6.10-23.fc31.x86_64 sheepdog-1.0.1-10.fc31.x86_64 trousers-0.3.13-13.fc31.x86_64 trousers-lib-0.3.13-13.fc31.x86_64 wget-1.20.3-2.fc31.x86_64 xorg-x11-drv-openchrome-0.6.0-8.fc31.x86_64 xorg-x11-drv-qxl-0.1.5-12.fc31.x86_64 Occasionally you do see some packages that seem off a cycle. On a Fedora 31 system: $ rpm -qa | grep fc30 | sort -n efivar-debugsource-37-1.fc30.x86_64 efivar-libs-37-1.fc30.x86_64 efivar-libs-debuginfo-37-1.fc30.x86_64 js-jquery-3.3.1-2.fc30.noarch libcanberra-0.30-19.fc30.x86_64 libcanberra-gtk2-0.30-19.fc30.x86_64 libcanberra-gtk3-0.30-19.fc30.x86_64 [chris@flap ~]$ -- Chris Murphy ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 32 / Fedora 33
Sometime in the past two weeks, the Rawhide updates apparently removed all fc31 packages. Does that sound right ? Or was it just my imagination ? David Locklear Rawhide Novice Level 0.0.1 Arcola, Texas USA [ Intel i5-3470 desktop, with Rawhide Xfce as my only operating system on an SSD ] ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 32 / Fedora 33
On Sat, Feb 15, 2020, at 3:29 PM, YOUNG, MICHAEL A. wrote: > On Sat, 15 Feb 2020, Peter Robinson wrote: > > >> I would also like to know what I need to do to stay on the f32 path, if I > >> decide to do that instead. > >> That is probably my best option, since I really do not know much about > >> computers. > > > > dnf config-manager --set-enabled fedora updates updates-testing > > dnf config-manager --set-disabled rawhide > > dnf --releasever=32 --setopt=install_weak_deps=False > > --setopt=deltarpm=false distro-sync > > This may not be safe to do at the moment as I was trying earlier to update > an F32 VM and it was getting offered .fc33 packages from the Fedora 32 > (not Rawhide) repos as reported by dnf. > I think it's because they froze f32 waiting for a compose instead of freezing rawhide/f33 until the compose. V/r, James Cassell ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: booting .iso image from fedoraproject.org
On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 2:46 PM George R Goffe wrote: > > Chris, > > This is EXACTLY what I'm seeing. > > I updated my system last night. There were a bunch of F33 pkgs... and gpg > keys are out of sync now. SIgh... > > It seems that all the kernels I have are exhibiting this problem except for > 5.6.0-0.rc1.git0.1.fc32.x86_64. Current kernels are: > > kernel-5.5.0-0.rc4.git1.1.fc32.x86_64 > kernel-5.6.0-0.rc1.git0.1.fc32.x86_64 > kernel-5.6.0-0.rc1.git2.1.fc33.x86_64 > > It seems that the rescue system had similar problems. > > A question: Is the kernel where the I/O support for VTs is located? My > problems seemed to be with the password prompt. I don't know what the code > path is though. > I think it's agetty. But I don't know all the interaction between systemd-logind, systemd-usersdb, plymouth, agetty, sssd, and pam. So yeah, don't worry if you're confused. I guess most QA folks at this time will wait for the branching dust to settle, and then either clean install Fedora 32 when there's a new test image announced; or switch to branched *before* doing a dnf update on Rawhide. If you do a dnf update while on Rawhide, following branching, you'll stay on Rawhide which means changing to fc33. -- Chris Murphy ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 32 / Fedora 33
On Sat, 15 Feb 2020, David wrote: > Thank you Mr. Young. > That is what my update did. I rechecked and (after dnf clean all) I am now getting F32 packages. > Is there something that I can do on my end to install the F33 key ? Ideally it should get installed as part of a standard dnf update. If that isn't working for you the key will be in the fedora-gpg-keys package which you can install from a mirror, eg. rpm -Fvh https://www.mirrorservice.org/sites/dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/Everything/x86_64/os/Packages/f/fedora-gpg-keys-33-0.1.noarch.rpm though you may need to add more packages to that command if there are dependencies and that link will stop working if a later version of that package is released. Michael Young ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 32 / Fedora 33
On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 2:20 PM David wrote: > > Thank you Mr. Young. > > That is what my update did. > > Is there something that I can do on my end to install the F33 key ? It'll be installed automatically ... fedora-gpg-keys noarch 33-0.1 rawhide 102 k You'll get a prompt before the first fc33 package is installed to confirm the import of the key. Ordinarily you can confirm the keys by checking fingerprints at https://getfedora.org/security/ The signing key for Rawhide is different from fc32. This is what I get. $ gpg2 /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-33-primary gpg: WARNING: no command supplied. Trying to guess what you mean ... pub rsa4096 2020-01-28 [SCE] 963A2BEB02009608FE67EA4249FD77499570FF31 uid Fedora (33) > My opinion, on matters of Rawhide are irrlevant, but it would seem to me that > the procedure for updating on Day# 1 of the branch-off is flawed, as my > research has shown this happens every version, on Day#1. Meaning, I think > that on Day # 1 of the switch to F33, that less packages should be installed > - maybe just the kernel. Or at least include notes as to what a user > updating to F33 should do. In theory, nothing. The gotcha is that staying on Rawhide means at branch time you've opted in to being switched over to the next Fedora. And in practice it's not just one switch being flipped that causes everything to instantly happen, but a several day process that can sometimes be messy for reasons that aren't always predictable. One of which is that it takes time for the mirrors to sync. -- Chris Murphy ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: booting .iso image from fedoraproject.org
Chris, This is EXACTLY what I'm seeing. I updated my system last night. There were a bunch of F33 pkgs... and gpg keys are out of sync now. SIgh... It seems that all the kernels I have are exhibiting this problem except for 5.6.0-0.rc1.git0.1.fc32.x86_64. Current kernels are: kernel-5.5.0-0.rc4.git1.1.fc32.x86_64 kernel-5.6.0-0.rc1.git0.1.fc32.x86_64 kernel-5.6.0-0.rc1.git2.1.fc33.x86_64 It seems that the rescue system had similar problems. A question: Is the kernel where the I/O support for VTs is located? My problems seemed to be with the password prompt. I don't know what the code path is though. THANKS for your response. George... On Saturday, February 15, 2020, 10:39:17 AM PST, Chris Murphy wrote: An F32 (workstation) guest on an F32 host, using virt-manager I'm seeing in a VT some unworkable behavior with keyboard use. I type letters, but nothing happens, and then maybe every 3rd character a CR somehow gets entered. So I get to the password field before I should, and there a single character also acts as CR. So basically the VT is unusable. I can ssh into it OK. But this system is before branch, so technically it's Rawhide. I figure I'll just abandon it, and clean install F32 once the dust has settled with branching and there's a recommended image, newer than 20200212. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test -- Chris Murphy ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 32 / Fedora 33
Thank you Mr. Young. That is what my update did. Is there something that I can do on my end to install the F33 key ? My opinion, on matters of Rawhide are irrlevant, but it would seem to me that the procedure for updating on Day# 1 of the branch-off is flawed, as my research has shown this happens every version, on Day#1. Meaning, I think that on Day # 1 of the switch to F33, that less packages should be installed - maybe just the kernel. Or at least include notes as to what a user updating to F33 should do. David Locklear Rawhide novice Arcola, Texas USA ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: booting .iso image from fedoraproject.org
On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 12:44 PM Louis Lagendijk wrote: > > On Sat, 2020-02-15 at 11:39 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > > An F32 (workstation) guest on an F32 host, using virt-manager I'm > > seeing in a VT some unworkable behavior with keyboard use. I type > > letters, but nothing happens, and then maybe every 3rd character a CR > > somehow gets entered. So I get to the password field before I should, > > and there a single character also acts as CR. So basically the VT is > > unusable. I can ssh into it OK. But this system is before branch, so > > technically it's Rawhide. I figure I'll just abandon it, and clean > > install F32 once the dust has settled with branching and there's a > > recommended image, newer than 20200212. > > > I see the same on my Rawhide VM. I normally SSH in so it is not a big > issue. It looks as if plymouth does not finish booting or there is some > other issue with it It may be eating some key presses. I don't know > much about plymouth so I may be way off That sounds familiar. I was seeing plymouth spinning away at maybe 10% CPU even though I was at a (text) login screen. > > Anyhow I see the following in the journal: > > Feb 15 20:33:49 rawhide-builder.home.fazant.net systemd[1]: plymouth- > quit.service: Succeeded. > Feb 15 20:33:49 rawhide-builder.home.fazant.net audit[1]: SERVICE_START > pid=1 uid=0 auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 > subj=system_u:system_r:init_t:s0 msg='unit=plymouth-quit comm="systemd" > exe="/usr/lib/systemd/systemd" hostname=? addr=? terminal=? > res=success' > Feb 15 20:33:49 rawhide-builder.home.fazant.net audit[1]: SERVICE_STOP > pid=1 uid=0 auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 > subj=system_u:system_r:init_t:s0 msg='unit=plymouth-quit comm="systemd" > exe="/usr/lib/systemd/systemd" hostname=? addr=? terminal=? > res=success' > Feb 15 20:33:50 rawhide-builder.home.fazant.net systemd[1]: plymouth- > read-write.service: Start request repeated too quickly. > Feb 15 20:33:50 rawhide-builder.home.fazant.net systemd[1]: plymouth- > read-write.service: Failed with result 'start-limit-hit'. > Feb 15 20:33:50 rawhide-builder.home.fazant.net systemd[1]: plymouth- > read-write.service: Start request repeated too quickly. > Feb 15 20:33:50 rawhide-builder.home.fazant.net systemd[1]: plymouth- > read-write.service: Failed with result 'start-limit-hit' > I'm not off hand seeing a relevant bug report yet. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_status=__open__&bug_status=__closed__&classification=Fedora&component=plymouth&list_id=10842201&product=Fedora&query_format=advanced&version=32&version=rawhide -- Chris Murphy ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 32 / Fedora 33
On Sat, 15 Feb 2020, Peter Robinson wrote: >> I would also like to know what I need to do to stay on the f32 path, if I >> decide to do that instead. >> That is probably my best option, since I really do not know much about >> computers. > > dnf config-manager --set-enabled fedora updates updates-testing > dnf config-manager --set-disabled rawhide > dnf --releasever=32 --setopt=install_weak_deps=False > --setopt=deltarpm=false distro-sync This may not be safe to do at the moment as I was trying earlier to update an F32 VM and it was getting offered .fc33 packages from the Fedora 32 (not Rawhide) repos as reported by dnf. Michael Young ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: booting .iso image from fedoraproject.org
On Sat, 2020-02-15 at 11:39 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > An F32 (workstation) guest on an F32 host, using virt-manager I'm > seeing in a VT some unworkable behavior with keyboard use. I type > letters, but nothing happens, and then maybe every 3rd character a CR > somehow gets entered. So I get to the password field before I should, > and there a single character also acts as CR. So basically the VT is > unusable. I can ssh into it OK. But this system is before branch, so > technically it's Rawhide. I figure I'll just abandon it, and clean > install F32 once the dust has settled with branching and there's a > recommended image, newer than 20200212. > I see the same on my Rawhide VM. I normally SSH in so it is not a big issue. It looks as if plymouth does not finish booting or there is some other issue with it It may be eating some key presses. I don't know much about plymouth so I may be way off Anyhow I see the following in the journal: Feb 15 20:33:49 rawhide-builder.home.fazant.net systemd[1]: plymouth- quit.service: Succeeded. Feb 15 20:33:49 rawhide-builder.home.fazant.net audit[1]: SERVICE_START pid=1 uid=0 auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 subj=system_u:system_r:init_t:s0 msg='unit=plymouth-quit comm="systemd" exe="/usr/lib/systemd/systemd" hostname=? addr=? terminal=? res=success' Feb 15 20:33:49 rawhide-builder.home.fazant.net audit[1]: SERVICE_STOP pid=1 uid=0 auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 subj=system_u:system_r:init_t:s0 msg='unit=plymouth-quit comm="systemd" exe="/usr/lib/systemd/systemd" hostname=? addr=? terminal=? res=success' Feb 15 20:33:50 rawhide-builder.home.fazant.net systemd[1]: plymouth- read-write.service: Start request repeated too quickly. Feb 15 20:33:50 rawhide-builder.home.fazant.net systemd[1]: plymouth- read-write.service: Failed with result 'start-limit-hit'. Feb 15 20:33:50 rawhide-builder.home.fazant.net systemd[1]: plymouth- read-write.service: Start request repeated too quickly. Feb 15 20:33:50 rawhide-builder.home.fazant.net systemd[1]: plymouth- read-write.service: Failed with result 'start-limit-hit' -- Louis ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: booting .iso image from fedoraproject.org
An F32 (workstation) guest on an F32 host, using virt-manager I'm seeing in a VT some unworkable behavior with keyboard use. I type letters, but nothing happens, and then maybe every 3rd character a CR somehow gets entered. So I get to the password field before I should, and there a single character also acts as CR. So basically the VT is unusable. I can ssh into it OK. But this system is before branch, so technically it's Rawhide. I figure I'll just abandon it, and clean install F32 once the dust has settled with branching and there's a recommended image, newer than 20200212. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test -- Chris Murphy ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 32 / Fedora 33
> I am a Rawhide user, although I am not your intended audience.I just like > tinkering with it. > > Today, my install of Rawhide ( Xfce ), tried futily to update to the f33 path. > > I would like to know what I need to do to continue on that f33 path. I am > missing a key. Right ? The key is in /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/ and dnf should find and prompt you to import it. > I would also like to know what I need to do to stay on the f32 path, if I > decide to do that instead. > That is probably my best option, since I really do not know much about > computers. dnf config-manager --set-enabled fedora updates updates-testing dnf config-manager --set-disabled rawhide dnf --releasever=32 --setopt=install_weak_deps=False --setopt=deltarpm=false distro-sync > Either way, I am eventually probably going to install both on a separate SSD, > so I might as well > just keep this install going on the f33 path.Right ? I've no opinion either way there. ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora 32 / Fedora 33
Dear Fedorians / Fedorans ? I am a Rawhide user, although I am not your intended audience.I just like tinkering with it. Today, my install of Rawhide ( Xfce ), tried futily to update to the f33 path. I would like to know what I need to do to continue on that f33 path. I am missing a key. Right ? I would also like to know what I need to do to stay on the f32 path, if I decide to do that instead. That is probably my best option, since I really do not know much about computers. Either way, I am eventually probably going to install both on a separate SSD, so I might as well just keep this install going on the f33 path.Right ? Chears. David Locklear Arcola, Texas USA ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora-Cloud-31-20200215.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: booting .iso image from fedoraproject.org
On 2/15/20 1:03 AM, George R Goffe via test wrote: I have just downloaded https://download-ib01.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/Everything/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Everything-netinst-x86_64-Rawhide-20200214.n.1.iso and proceeded to boot in a VM. It seems that the boot procedure has changed some. Yes? I don't see anything different. I booted several times into "troubleshooting" and got the same behavior. It's like my keyboard is broken. I have to hit keys more than once to get the characters to appear. I'm pretty sure the keyboard isn't broken though since I don't see this problem elsewhere AND it doesn't appear when booting other images. I can verify this. Something else is stealing the keystrokes. I did notice the screen flashing sometimes when pressing the keys that got taken. I also did the "verify image" procedure. The image passed but then the VM went into install mode. I was expecting to be returned to the initial menu. I wanted rescue mode you see... which leads back to the keyboard problem described above. The verify menu item says "check media and *install rawhide*" so that's not a bug and has always worked like that. Should I make bug reports on these issues? If there isn't one for the keyboard problem yet, then yes. ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
booting .iso image from fedoraproject.org
Hi, I have just downloaded https://download-ib01.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/Everything/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Everything-netinst-x86_64-Rawhide-20200214.n.1.iso and proceeded to boot in a VM. It seems that the boot procedure has changed some. Yes? I booted several times into "troubleshooting" and got the same behavior. It's like my keyboard is broken. I have to hit keys more than once to get the characters to appear. I'm pretty sure the keyboard isn't broken though since I don't see this problem elsewhere AND it doesn't appear when booting other images. I also did the "verify image" procedure. The image passed but then the VM went into install mode. I was expecting to be returned to the initial menu. I wanted rescue mode you see... which leads back to the keyboard problem described above. Should I make bug reports on these issues? Best regards, George... ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora-Cloud-30-20200215.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
