Fedora-32-20200305.n.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 26/171 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-32-20200304.n.0): ID: 533797 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/533797 ID: 533804 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/533804 ID: 533853 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_printing URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/533853 ID: 533860 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/533860 ID: 533886 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso release_identification URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/533886 ID: 533898 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_lvmthin URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/533898 Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-32-20200304.n.0): ID: 533817 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/533817 ID: 533819 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_updates_nfs URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/533819 ID: 533850 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_background URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/533850 ID: 533867 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_background URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/533867 ID: 533874 Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/533874 ID: 533883 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso desktop_background URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/533883 ID: 533897 Test: x86_64 universal install_simple_encrypted@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/533897 ID: 533900 Test: x86_64 universal install_cyrillic_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/533900 ID: 533902 Test: x86_64 universal install_arabic_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/533902 ID: 533903 Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/533903 ID: 533912 Test: x86_64 universal install_software_raid URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/533912 ID: 533913 Test: x86_64 universal install_software_raid@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/533913 ID: 533920 Test: x86_64 universal install_european_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/533920 ID: 533925 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_software_raid URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/533925 ID: 533928 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_software_raid@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/533928 ID: 533941 Test: x86_64 universal install_simple_encrypted URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/533941 ID: 533953 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/533953 ID: 533960 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/533960 ID: 533961 Test: x86_64 universal install_iscsi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/533961 ID: 533966 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_realmd_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/533966 ID: 533967 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_realmd_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/533967 Soft failed openQA tests: 14/171 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) New soft failures (same test not soft failed in Fedora-32-20200304.n.0): ID: 533833 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/533833 Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-32-20200304.n.0): ID: 533795 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/533795 ID: 533796 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/533796 ID: 533798 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/533798 ID: 533800 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/533800 ID: 533803 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/533803 ID: 533824 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/533824 ID: 533855 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/533855 ID: 533887 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/533887 ID: 533896 Test: x86_64 universal install_serial_console URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/533896 ID: 533914 Test: x86_64 universal install_anaconda_text URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/533914 ID: 533949 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_kde_64bit URL:
Re: Call for testers: lzo update
On Thu, 2020-03-05 at 11:22 -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > Hello, > > The following update needs some karma so it can be released sooner than 12 > days from > now. > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-25291e492f Regardless of karma, it won't be released until at least ~19 days from now unless the bug is given a freeze exception, because we are in Beta freeze. I will nominate the bug for an FE, citing this email. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora-IoT-32-20200305.0 compose check report
Missing expected images: Iot dvd aarch64 Iot dvd x86_64 Soft failed openQA tests: 2/8 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-IoT-32-20200304.0): ID: 534129 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/534129 ID: 534130 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/534130 Passed openQA tests: 6/8 (x86_64) Installed system changes in test x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload: 2 services(s) added since previous compose: chronyd.service, systemd-fsck@dev-disk-by\x2duuid-8e916a09\x2d4038\x2d4d25\x2d95d8\x2daa4b13c7aa36.service 1 services(s) removed since previous compose: systemd-fsck@dev-disk-by\x2duuid-2bd4fff9\x2db889\x2d4130\x2d9e22\x2d3968c7b2fd48.service Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/533027#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/534129#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi: 3 services(s) added since previous compose: chronyd.service, systemd-fsck@dev-disk-by\x2duuid-2A03\x2d2E88.service, systemd-fsck@dev-disk-by\x2duuid-64652b23\x2d26fe\x2d44c9\x2d8916\x2df7a6ca6979b1.service 2 services(s) removed since previous compose: systemd-fsck@dev-disk-by\x2duuid-68cc2c90\x2dd933\x2d48c2\x2d83cc\x2d2fba7253f565.service, systemd-fsck@dev-disk-by\x2duuid-B629\x2dF21E.service Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/533028#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/534130#downloads -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora 32 compose report: 20200305.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-32-20200304.n.0 NEW: Fedora-32-20200305.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 8 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:197.15 KiB Size of upgraded packages: 0 B Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: 0 B Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B = ADDED IMAGES = = DROPPED IMAGES = Image: Container_Minimal_Base docker s390x Path: Container/s390x/images/Fedora-Container-Minimal-Base-32-20200304.n.0.s390x.tar.xz Image: Server dvd s390x Path: Server/s390x/iso/Fedora-Server-dvd-s390x-32-20200304.n.0.iso Image: Container_Base docker s390x Path: Container/s390x/images/Fedora-Container-Base-32-20200304.n.0.s390x.tar.xz Image: Cloud_Base vmdk s390x Path: Cloud/s390x/images/Fedora-Cloud-Base-32-20200304.n.0.s390x.vmdk Image: Everything boot s390x Path: Everything/s390x/iso/Fedora-Everything-netinst-s390x-32-20200304.n.0.iso Image: Cloud_Base qcow2 s390x Path: Cloud/s390x/images/Fedora-Cloud-Base-32-20200304.n.0.s390x.qcow2 Image: Cloud_Base raw-xz s390x Path: Cloud/s390x/images/Fedora-Cloud-Base-32-20200304.n.0.s390x.raw.xz Image: Server boot s390x Path: Server/s390x/iso/Fedora-Server-netinst-s390x-32-20200304.n.0.iso = ADDED PACKAGES = = DROPPED PACKAGES = Package: cerbere-2.5.0-4.fc32 Summary: Pantheon session watchdog RPMs:cerbere Size:197.15 KiB = UPGRADED PACKAGES = = DOWNGRADED PACKAGES = ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Call for testers: lzo update
Hello, The following update needs some karma so it can be released sooner than 12 days from now. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-25291e492f The lzo package was updated last month from 2.08 (dated 2014) to 2.10 (dated 2017). Part of the code in the new version is not properly written to work with gcc aliasing and the resulting binary does not work. I've applied a workaround (disabling gcc strict aliasing) until the maintainer or upstream fixes it. Bug report: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1807737 Thanks, Michael ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Revamping the Release Readiness meeting
The Fedora 32 Beta release readiness meeting will be held in #fedora-meeting-1 at 19:00 UTC on Thursday 12 March. You can see it on Fedocal at: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/Fedora%20release/2020/3/12/#m9717 As a reminder, please ensure your team's readiness status is updated on the wiki: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Release_Readiness -- Ben Cotton He / Him / His Senior Program Manager, Fedora & CentOS Stream Red Hat TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Test-Announce] Fedora 32 Beta Go/No-Go meeting
Dear all, The Go/No-Go meeting for the Fedora 32 Beta release will be held on Thursday, 2020-03-12 at 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1. For more information, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Go_No_Go_Meeting View the meeting on Fedocal at: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/9716/ As usual, we will have the Release Readiness meeting following at 19:00 UTC. This time, I'm asking teams to do their homework in advance. Please update your team's status at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Release_Readiness -- Ben Cotton He / Him / His Senior Program Manager, Fedora & CentOS Stream Red Hat TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis ___ test-announce mailing list -- test-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora-Cloud-31-20200305.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: proposal: Default application functionality criterion reduction
On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 9:28 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 1:55 PM Kamil Paral wrote: > > > > """ > > If there are multiple applications of the same type (e.g. several web > browsers), the primary/default one must satisfy the requirements. If the > primary/default application can't be determined, only one of said > applications must satisfy the requirements. > > > > Note: Determining primary applications > > The usual way to determine a primary/default application is to look into > system configuration where default applications are set (e.g. > gnome-control-center -> Default Applications), or to launch the default > application on an appropriate file type (e.g. double click on an .odt file > in a file browser), or to look into a favorites menu section (e.g. KDE menu > -> Favorites). > > """ > > I like it. This seems like a reasonable way to address their concerns. > Another approach could be to have the maintaining SIG provide their > preferred default and in cases where none is provided, at least one > has to work. So maybe, e.g. Llama Spin doesn't care *which* web > browser works, but Alpaca Spin says Firefox has to work even if > another browser is functional. > > This essentially lets us go with the original proposal as a default > case instead of having to go through and figure it out (because it may > change from release-to-release, so it has to be verified every cycle) > Yes, that's also an option. However, I intentionally tried to stay away from hard-coding concrete application names in release criteria (doesn't matter who maintains them, whether QA or some SIG). There's a maintenance cost I'd like to avoid. I'm afraid that people will forget to update the criteria when there are changes in the desktop apps. Also, if the list grows and people can't remember it, it might actually be easier to figure out the default application from the desktop environment than open the criteria, find the relevant section, and learn the application names. So I'd rather go with the generic solution, and if it doesn't work well, we can always change it to what you said or something similar. ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora-Cloud-30-20200305.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
