Re: some Fedora 34 feedback

[David]

I now have Fedora 34 WS Beta installed on my secondary NVMe. The only
thing I can see to comment about is
that during the installation of the bootloader, that Anaconda kicked me
back to the menu you first get when you are asked
if you want to try Fedora or to Install.  I am not sure if this had
something to do with the time of the screen lock, as I was not paying
close attention ( I was half-asleep ). So I just decided to wait a few
minutes and then reboot. Everything seems normal.

This may have been the first time I tried the live installer.

I ran an update and rebooted, played a game of FreeCell, surfed the web,
watched a video while checking htop, and now sending this email.

I replaced this over my Fedora 33 install, so now I have Rawhide on my
primary NVMe, and Fedora 34 Beta on the secondary NVMe, on a Gigabyte
Vision B550 motherboard.

In the Rawhide install I did a few hours ago, I had to manually do the
wi-fi part, which I think would have been confusing to some new users,
but in the 34 Beta, I just had to click on the network, and enter the
password, which I think any computer user in 2021 should be able to
do, as that part is nearly the same on smartphones.

In the Rawhide install, I had a choice of time formats, but it did not
work.I did not see that in 34 Beta.

In the Rawhide install, the installer shows many of the packages being
installed, but in 34 Beta, it just vaguely reads "installing software" and
randomly jumps from 3% to other random percentages.

In 34 Beta, the hurricane animation does not spin during installing
software.

I think 34 Beta WS has a few more apps included than Rawhide WS.I will
have to take a closer look.

David Locklear

>
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: some Fedora 34 feedback

[u9000 (Nine)]

On Sun, 2021-03-28 at 21:54 -0500, David wrote:
> Never mind.   I am retarded.

We all make mistakes :-)

-- 
u9000 (Nine)
They, Them, Theirs
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Self-introduction: TheEvilSkeleton

[u9000 (Nine)]

On Mon, 2021-03-29 at 09:48 +0800, Robbi Nespu wrote:
> It nothing wrong of using pseudo name, unless you do something break the 
> rule and law (eventually, the people with real name also did break the 
> law and rules nowadays)shrug
> 
> I see it as TheEvilSkeleton come to contribute and "break" the software 
> as QA test.

I can personally vouch for Tesk that he did not apply to break the
software.

-- 
u9000 (Nine)
They, Them, Theirs
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: some Fedora 34 feedback

[David]

Never mind.   I am retarded.

I forgot to put the iso of 34 on the thumbdrive, and accidently used my old
Rawhide iso.

David Locklear
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

some Fedora 34 feedback

[David]

I just did an install on my secondary NVMe of Fedora 34 using the March 26
nightly of Workstation Live.

I have done about 50 such installs in the last four years, but this was my
first with wi-fi.

I was not able to change the time to AM/PM in that part of the installer.

However, somewhere and somehow, I must have screwed up and installed
Rawhide Everything Boot on
the USB thumb-drive, instead of the Fedora 34 nightly.

David Locklear
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Self-introduction: TheEvilSkeleton

[Robbi Nespu]

It nothing wrong of using pseudo name, unless you do something break the 
rule and law (eventually, the people with real name also did break the 
law and rules nowadays)shrug


I see it as TheEvilSkeleton come to contribute and "break" the software 
as QA test.


I am curious guy, so I did some search... Look like TheEvilSkeleton is 
good writer and he/she already have experience a lot with flatplak.


Welcome to Fedora QA, take look on wiki [1]. Do you have FAS? go and get 
it, Fedora have interesting way of reward if you contribute, it give you 
badge[2]


[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing
[2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Open_Badges
--
Email : Robbi Nespu 
PGP fingerprint : D311 B5FF EEE6 0BE8 9C91 FA9E 0C81 FA30 3B3A 80BA
PGP key : https://keybase.io/robbinespu/pgp_keys.asc


OpenPGP_0x0C81FA303B3A80BA_and_old_rev.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys


OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Self-introduction: TheEvilSkeleton

[TheEvilSkeleton]

Hi,


Leaving aside the question of using a real name...
It is much easier to take people seriously if they have a more 
sensible,

even if boring, name.  The names you suggested might be fine in your
existing situation, but imply (probably incorrectly) a lack of 
maturity,
and some people would also find them offensive (though I'm sure that 
is

not your intention).


Sorry for those that find my username offensive, and sorry that the 
names are a bit immature; no one pointed it out to me me before so I 
didn't notice, so I appreciate the feedback. May I ask which name 
specifically is the one that would be considered as offensive?


As for my real name, I prefer not to share it online currently. I don't 
feel "strong" enough to do so. However, I am planning to upload my CV 
on my website someday, and until then, I will use my real name. I hope 
it's okay, but if it's required to provide the name, then I will do so.


Hi and welcome! You may also want to take a look at the Fedora Docs 
team,

and perhaps Fedora Magazine.

Will do. Thank you.


This is so true.  I think for programmers, it isn't as much fun to
write documentation.  And there are always more bugs to fix, and code 
to

write, than programmer hours, so it is human nature to let the
documentation slide. And, open source changes so rapidly that
documentation goes out of date quickly.
May your successes be legion.  :-)

Agreed, and thank you.

On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 08:13, Gavin Flower 
 wrote:

On 29/03/2021 02:24, Michael Schwendt wrote:

On Sat, 27 Mar 2021 12:15:13 -0400, TheEvilSkeleton wrote:


My alias is TheEvilSkeleton, but you can also call me Tesk,
TheEvilSkely, Skelly, Proprietary Chrome-chan or anything close to 
it.

May I ask for your real name?

Where does this come from that people introduce themselves with
pseudonyms, aliases, usernames but no real name?
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org 

To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org 

Fedora Code of Conduct: 

List Guidelines: 

List Archives: 

Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 



Hi,

Leaving aside the question of using a real name...

It is much easier to take people seriously if they have a more 
sensible,

even if boring, name.  The names you suggested might be fine in your
existing situation, but imply (probably incorrectly) a lack of 
maturity,
and some people would also find them offensive (though I'm sure that 
is

not your intention).


Cheers,
Gavin
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org 

To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org 

Fedora Code of Conduct: 

List Guidelines: 

List Archives: 

Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 



___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: wi-fi question

[stan via test]

On Mon, 29 Mar 2021 03:37:56 +0800
Ed Greshko  wrote:

> On 29/03/2021 03:03, stan via test wrote:
> > This.  There is a command that the user can run after the update,
> > and it will find all of these and present them to the user with a
> > little mini menu with single letter commands  
> 
> The command you reference is rpmconf.

Thanks Ed, I couldn't remember it, even though I remembered using it
after I saw it mentioned on the mailing list.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: wi-fi question

[Ed Greshko]

On 29/03/2021 03:03, stan via test wrote:

This.  There is a command that the user can run after the update, and
it will find all of these and present them to the user with a little
mini menu with single letter commands


The command you reference is rpmconf.

--
Remind me to ignore comments which aren't germane to the thread.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Self-introduction: TheEvilSkeleton

[Gavin Flower]

On 29/03/2021 02:24, Michael Schwendt wrote:

On Sat, 27 Mar 2021 12:15:13 -0400, TheEvilSkeleton wrote:


My alias is TheEvilSkeleton, but you can also call me Tesk,
TheEvilSkely, Skelly, Proprietary Chrome-chan or anything close to it.

May I ask for your real name?

Where does this come from that people introduce themselves with
pseudonyms, aliases, usernames but no real name?
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Hi,

Leaving aside the question of using a real name...

It is much easier to take people seriously if they have a more sensible, 
even if boring, name.  The names you suggested might be fine in your 
existing situation, but imply (probably incorrectly) a lack of maturity, 
and some people would also find them offensive (though I'm sure that is 
not your intention).



Cheers,
Gavin
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: wi-fi question

[stan via test]

On Sat, 27 Mar 2021 17:56:08 -0400
Richard Ryniker  wrote:

> >  From David, not quoted:
> >  Upgrading: grub2-efi-x64-1:2.06~rc1-3.fc35.x86_64
> >159/498 warning:
> > /boot/grub2/grubenv created as /boot/grub2/grubenv.rpmnew
> >
> >   Upgrading: grub2-efi-x64-1:2.06~rc1-3.fc35.x86_64
> > 159/498 warning:
> > /boot/grub2/grubenv created as /boot/grub2/grubenv.rpmnew  
> 
> I do not think these are errors.  I have seen similar warnings in the
> past, and think this just indicates some file in the new package would
> replace an earlier file that appears to contain some modifications.
> Instead of replacing the (possibly modified) file, the new version is
> stored with the ".rpmnew" suffix.  The user can then explore the
> difference between the old and new files, and decide what should be
> done.
> 
> The purpose is surely to prevent an update causing something to break
> due to loss of local configuration data.
> 
> This is why we see a modern preference to place local configuration
> data in small files added to something-or-other-conf.d directories.
> Because these pieces are new (i.e. not part of a package, but local
> to a system) and dynamically included by a configuratioin process,
> they will not produce this warning message when a package update
> occurs.

This.  There is a command that the user can run after the update, and
it will find all of these and present them to the user with a little
mini menu with single letter commands, like D for a diff of the two
configuration files, accept the new one, retain the old one, etc.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Self-introduction: TheEvilSkeleton

[stan via test]

On Sun, 28 Mar 2021 15:24:38 +0200
Michael Schwendt  wrote:

> On Sat, 27 Mar 2021 12:15:13 -0400, TheEvilSkeleton wrote:
> 
> > My alias is TheEvilSkeleton, but you can also call me Tesk,
> > TheEvilSkely, Skelly, Proprietary Chrome-chan or anything close to
> > it.
> 
> May I ask for your real name?
> 
> Where does this come from that people introduce themselves with
> pseudonyms, aliases, usernames but no real name?

I can't speak for the original poster, but for my part I consider it a
means of thwarting the ubiquitous tracking on the web.  Especially by
those giant vampire squids, google and facebook.  Make their AI work
for my data!
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Self-introduction: TheEvilSkeleton

[stan via test]

On Sat, 27 Mar 2021 12:15:13 -0400
TheEvilSkeleton  wrote:

> Hello everyone!

> I try my best to learn as much
> as I can so I can contribute back what I've learned. I mostly
> contribute to documentation, since it's one of the places where free
> and open source software (FOSS) falls behind, but also because it's
> where I am very good at.

This is so true.  I think for programmers, it isn't as much fun to
write documentation.  And there are always more bugs to fix, and code to
write, than programmer hours, so it is human nature to let the
documentation slide. And, open source changes so rapidly that
documentation goes out of date quickly.

May your successes be legion.  :-)
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Fedora-IoT-34-20210328.0 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

No missing expected images.

Failed openQA tests: 2/16 (x86_64), 3/15 (aarch64)

New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210327.0):

ID: 833822  Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso release_identification
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833822
ID: 833837  Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso release_identification@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833837

Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210327.0):

ID: 833819  Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833819
ID: 833835  Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833835
ID: 833836  Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833836

Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210327.0):

ID: 833821  Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833821

Passed openQA tests: 13/16 (x86_64), 12/15 (aarch64)

Installed system changes in test x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso 
install_default@uefi: 
System load changed from 0.23 to 0.09
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/832317#downloads
Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833820#downloads

Installed system changes in test aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso 
install_default_upload@uefi: 
System load changed from 0.23 to 0.12
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/832332#downloads
Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833829#downloads
-- 
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Self-introduction: TheEvilSkeleton

[Matthew Miller]

On Sun, Mar 28, 2021 at 03:24:38PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Where does this come from that people introduce themselves with
> pseudonyms, aliases, usernames but no real name?

If anything, I think it's a lot less common than it used to be.

-- 
Matthew Miller

Fedora Project Leader
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Self-introduction: TheEvilSkeleton

[Matthew Miller]

On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 12:15:13PM -0400, TheEvilSkeleton wrote:
> as I can so I can contribute back what I've learned. I mostly
> contribute to documentation, since it's one of the places where free
> and open source software (FOSS) falls behind, but also because it's
> where I am very good at. I also experiment; I play around a lot with
> distributions, containers, VMs and more, hence me trying out many
> Linux distributions in the past. I often break stuff because, well,
> I play around things a lot and I'm very experimental.

Hi and welcome! You may also want to take a look at the Fedora Docs team,
and perhaps Fedora Magazine.


> On a more personal note, I'm a 19 year old "student". I'm quoting
> "student", since I stopped attending to classes because I couldn't
> concentrate anymore due to stress and heavy pressure from college
> because of COVID. Instead of doing nothing during the time, I
> decided to join QA to contribute more to FOSS and collaborating with
> people around the world, and be part of the Year of the Linux

It takes some strength to know when you need a break, and it's great you've
found this to be a productive and fulfilling place to put your effort.




-- 
Matthew Miller

Fedora Project Leader
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Fedora-34-20210328.n.0 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

No missing expected images.

Failed openQA tests: 10/127 (aarch64), 6/189 (x86_64)

New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-34-20210327.n.0):

ID: 833519  Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_default_upload@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833519
ID: 833579  Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_browser@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833579
ID: 833674  Test: aarch64 universal install_mirrorlist_graphical@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833674

Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-34-20210327.n.0):

ID: 833455  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833455
ID: 833478  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833478
ID: 833483  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833483
ID: 833509  Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz base_services_start@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833509
ID: 833510  Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz base_selinux@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833510
ID: 833511  Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz 
base_service_manipulation@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833511
ID: 833514  Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz release_identification@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833514
ID: 833594  Test: x86_64 universal install_cyrillic_language
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833594
ID: 833617  Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833617
ID: 833652  Test: x86_64 universal install_arabic_language
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833652
ID: 833667  Test: aarch64 universal install_cyrillic_language@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833667
ID: 833677  Test: aarch64 universal install_asian_language@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833677
ID: 833703  Test: aarch64 universal install_arabic_language@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833703

Soft failed openQA tests: 6/127 (aarch64), 4/189 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

New soft failures (same test not soft failed in Fedora-34-20210327.n.0):

ID: 833560  Test: aarch64 Server-raw_xz-raw.xz 
install_arm_image_deployment_upload@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833560

Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-34-20210327.n.0):

ID: 833399  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_client
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833399
ID: 833443  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_client
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833443
ID: 833506  Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833506
ID: 833507  Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz 
install_arm_image_deployment_upload@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833507
ID: 833535  Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_client@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833535
ID: 833554  Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_client@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833554
ID: 833587  Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833587
ID: 833612  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_domain_controller
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833612
ID: 833681  Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_2_server_domain_controller@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833681

Passed openQA tests: 179/189 (x86_64), 88/127 (aarch64)

New passes (same test not passed in Fedora-34-20210327.n.0):

ID: 833477  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_update_graphical
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833477
ID: 833508  Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz base_update_cli@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833508
ID: 833512  Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz base_reboot_unmount@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833512
ID: 833513  Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz base_system_logging@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833513
ID: 833525  Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso support_server@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833525
ID: 833543  Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso 
install_repository_nfs_graphical@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833543
ID: 833561  Test: aarch64 Server-raw_xz-raw.xz base_services_start@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833561
ID: 833562  Test: aarch64 Server-raw_xz-raw.xz release_identification@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833562
ID: 833563  Test: aarch64 Server-raw_xz-raw.xz base_selinux@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833563
ID: 833564  Test: aarch64 Server-raw_xz-raw.xz 
base_servic

Fedora-Rawhide-20210328.n.0 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

No missing expected images.

Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed

Failed openQA tests: 11/189 (x86_64), 16/127 (aarch64)

New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210327.n.1):

ID: 833173  Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833173
ID: 833245  Test: aarch64 Server-raw_xz-raw.xz base_services_start@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833245
ID: 833246  Test: aarch64 Server-raw_xz-raw.xz release_identification@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833246
ID: 833247  Test: aarch64 Server-raw_xz-raw.xz base_selinux@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833247
ID: 833248  Test: aarch64 Server-raw_xz-raw.xz 
base_service_manipulation@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833248
ID: 833252  Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz 
install_arm_image_deployment_upload@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833252
ID: 833319  Test: x86_64 universal support_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833319
ID: 833343  Test: x86_64 universal install_iscsi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833343
ID: 833349  Test: aarch64 universal install_multi_empty@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833349
ID: 833355  Test: aarch64 universal install_european_language@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833355

Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210327.n.1):

ID: 833112  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833112
ID: 833129  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_updates
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833129
ID: 833139  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833139
ID: 833162  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833162
ID: 833167  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833167
ID: 833193  Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz base_services_start@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833193
ID: 833194  Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz base_selinux@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833194
ID: 833195  Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz 
base_service_manipulation@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833195
ID: 833198  Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz release_identification@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833198
ID: 833212  Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833212
ID: 833278  Test: x86_64 universal install_cyrillic_language
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833278
ID: 833301  Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833301
ID: 86  Test: x86_64 universal install_arabic_language
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/86
ID: 833351  Test: aarch64 universal install_cyrillic_language@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833351
ID: 833361  Test: aarch64 universal install_asian_language@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833361
ID: 833367  Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_minimal_64bit@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833367
ID: 833387  Test: aarch64 universal install_arabic_language@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833387

Soft failed openQA tests: 49/127 (aarch64), 68/189 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

New soft failures (same test not soft failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210327.n.1):

ID: 833231  Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_updates_nfs@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833231
ID: 833309  Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_xfs
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833309

Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210327.n.1):

ID: 833079  Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833079
ID: 833080  Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833080
ID: 833082  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833082
ID: 833083  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_client
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833083
ID: 833091  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833091
ID: 833106  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833106
ID: 833107  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833107
ID: 833113  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_hd_variation
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.or

Re: Shotwell question

[pmkel...@frontier.com]

On 3/28/21 11:30, David wrote:

I just installed Shotwell on a Rawhide WS install.

I assume the first mirror it tried to contact ( twice ? ), and then went to
look in a different mirror ??

Here is a partial readout:

Downloading Packages:
[MIRROR] shotwell-0.31.3-5.fc35.x86_64.rpm: Status code: 404 for
https://mirror.genesisadaptive.com/fedora/development/rawhide/Everything/x86_64/os/Packages/s/shotwell-0.31.3-5.fc35.x86_64.rpm
(IP: 64.250.112.70)
[MIRROR] shotwell-0.31.3-5.fc35.x86_64.rpm: Status code: 404 for
http://mirror.genesisadaptive.com/fedora/development/rawhide/Everything/x86_64/os/Packages/s/shotwell-0.31.3-5.fc35.x86_64.rpm
(IP: 64.250.112.70)
shotwell-0.31.3-5.fc35.x86_64.rpm   175 kB/s | 3.6 MB 00:21


Total   172 kB/s | 3.6 MB 00:21

Running transaction check
Transaction check succeeded.
Running transaction test
Transaction test succeeded.
Running transaction
   Preparing:
  1/1
   Installing   : shotwell-0.31.3-5.fc35.x86_64
  1/1
   Running scriptlet: shotwell-0.31.3-5.fc35.x86_64
  1/1
   Verifying: shotwell-0.31.3-5.fc35.x86_64
  1/1

Installed:
   shotwell-0.31.3-5.fc35.x86_64


Complete!


Is that helpful information to anybody ?



David Locklear


___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure



David,

THe mirrors are servers that make software available. their are LOTs of 
them. As far as I know they all do it voluntarily. The mirrors spread 
the traffic so no server or group of servers get overloaded.


This mirror is one which hasn't been available much lately from my 
experience. Several mirrors have either stopped service or have been 
less available since COVID. Many are hosted by colleges and 
universities. With no students and few others on hand the mirrors don't 
get much attention.


You seem to have gotten the software you wanted:
>  Installed:
>shotwell-0.31.3-5.fc35.x86_64

Though it doesn't show it, DNF just got the software from the next 
mirror in the list.


So life is good.

Have a Great Day!

Pat (tablepc)

___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Shotwell question

[David]

I just installed Shotwell on a Rawhide WS install.

I assume the first mirror it tried to contact ( twice ? ), and then went to
look in a different mirror ??

Here is a partial readout:

Downloading Packages:
[MIRROR] shotwell-0.31.3-5.fc35.x86_64.rpm: Status code: 404 for
https://mirror.genesisadaptive.com/fedora/development/rawhide/Everything/x86_64/os/Packages/s/shotwell-0.31.3-5.fc35.x86_64.rpm
(IP: 64.250.112.70)
[MIRROR] shotwell-0.31.3-5.fc35.x86_64.rpm: Status code: 404 for
http://mirror.genesisadaptive.com/fedora/development/rawhide/Everything/x86_64/os/Packages/s/shotwell-0.31.3-5.fc35.x86_64.rpm
(IP: 64.250.112.70)
shotwell-0.31.3-5.fc35.x86_64.rpm   175 kB/s | 3.6 MB 00:21


Total   172 kB/s | 3.6 MB 00:21

Running transaction check
Transaction check succeeded.
Running transaction test
Transaction test succeeded.
Running transaction
  Preparing:
 1/1
  Installing   : shotwell-0.31.3-5.fc35.x86_64
 1/1
  Running scriptlet: shotwell-0.31.3-5.fc35.x86_64
 1/1
  Verifying: shotwell-0.31.3-5.fc35.x86_64
 1/1

Installed:
  shotwell-0.31.3-5.fc35.x86_64


Complete!


Is that helpful information to anybody ?



David Locklear
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Fedora-IoT-35-20210328.0 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

Missing expected images:

Iot dvd x86_64
Iot dvd aarch64

Failed openQA tests: 7/15 (aarch64), 1/16 (x86_64)

New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210326.0):

ID: 833733  Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso podman@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833733
ID: 833734  Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso podman_client@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833734
ID: 833735  Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833735
ID: 833737  Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_ignition@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833737

Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210326.0):

ID: 833715  Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833715
ID: 833730  Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833730
ID: 833736  Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_rpmostree_overlay@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833736
ID: 833739  Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833739

Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210326.0):

ID: 833714  Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833714

Passed openQA tests: 14/16 (x86_64), 8/15 (aarch64)

Installed system changes in test aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso 
install_default_upload@uefi: 
System load changed from 0.40 to 0.79
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/831578#downloads
Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833727#downloads
-- 
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Fedora 34 compose report: 20210328.n.0 changes

[Fedora Rawhide Report]

OLD: Fedora-34-20210327.n.0
NEW: Fedora-34-20210328.n.0

= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images:  0
Added packages:  4
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages:   63
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages:  1.04 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded packages:   4.77 GiB
Size of downgraded packages: 0 B

Size change of upgraded packages:   -72.32 MiB
Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B

= ADDED IMAGES =
Image: Security live x86_64
Path: Labs/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Security-Live-x86_64-34-20210328.n.0.iso
Image: Server raw-xz aarch64
Path: Server/aarch64/images/Fedora-Server-34-20210328.n.0.aarch64.raw.xz

= DROPPED IMAGES =

= ADDED PACKAGES =
Package: dc3dd-7.2.646-13.fc34
Summary: Patched version of GNU dd for use in computer forensics
RPMs:dc3dd
Size:807.08 KiB

Package: emacs-company-mode-0.9.13-1.fc34
Summary: Modular in-buffer completion framework for Emacs
RPMs:emacs-company-mode
Size:120.58 KiB

Package: emacs-iedit-0.9.9.9-1.20210202git0d6d238.fc34
Summary: Edit multiple regions simultaneously in Emacs
RPMs:emacs-iedit
Size:121.99 KiB

Package: python-re-assert-1.1.0-1.fc34
Summary: Show where your regex match assertion failed!
RPMs:python3-re-assert
Size:12.95 KiB


= DROPPED PACKAGES =

= UPGRADED PACKAGES =
Package:  FlightGear-2020.3.7-1.fc34
Old package:  FlightGear-2020.3.6-1.fc34
Summary:  The FlightGear Flight Simulator
RPMs: FlightGear
Size: 35.01 MiB
Size change:  157.92 KiB
Changelog:
  * Mon Mar 22 2021 Fabrice Bellet  - 2020.3.7-1
  - new upstream release


Package:  FlightGear-Atlas-0.5.0-0.67.cvs20141002.fc34
Old package:  FlightGear-Atlas-0.5.0-0.66.cvs20141002.fc34
Summary:  Flightgear map tools
RPMs: FlightGear-Atlas
Size: 3.52 MiB
Size change:  -74 B
Changelog:
  * Mon Mar 22 2021 Fabrice Bellet  - 
0.5.0-0.67.cvs20141002
  - rebuild with newer SimGear


Package:  FlightGear-data-2020.3.7-1.fc34
Old package:  FlightGear-data-2020.3.6-1.fc34
Summary:  FlightGear base scenery and data files
RPMs: FlightGear-data
Size: 1.71 GiB
Size change:  -78.99 MiB
Changelog:
  * Mon Mar 22 2021 Fabrice Bellet  - 2020.3.7-1
  - new upstream release


Package:  SimGear-2020.3.7-1.fc34
Old package:  SimGear-2020.3.6-1.fc34
Summary:  Simulation library components
RPMs: SimGear SimGear-devel
Size: 12.06 MiB
Size change:  31.94 KiB
Changelog:
  * Mon Mar 22 2021 Fabrice Bellet  - 2020.3.7-1
  - new upstream release


Package:  ansible-lint-1:5.0.4-1.fc34
Old package:  ansible-lint-1:5.0.2-1.fc34
Summary:  Best practices checker for Ansible
RPMs: python3-ansible-lint
Size: 171.09 KiB
Size change:  7.66 KiB
Changelog:
  * Tue Mar 23 2021 Parag Nemade  - 1:5.0.4-1
  - Update to 5.0.4 version (#1940710)


Package:  atop-2.6.0-5.fc34
Old package:  atop-2.6.0-2.fc34
Summary:  An advanced interactive monitor to view the load on system and 
process level
RPMs: atop
Size: 886.71 KiB
Size change:  -3.79 KiB
Changelog:
  * Mon Feb 22 2021 Gwyn Ciesla  - 2.6.0-3
  - Don't ship atopgpud on EL-7

  * Tue Mar 02 2021 Zbigniew J??drzejewski-Szmek  - 2.6.0-4
  - Rebuilt for updated systemd-rpm-macros
See https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2583.

  * Tue Mar 23 2021 Gwyn Ciesla  - 2.6.0-5
  - Use upstream sysconfig file.


Package:  atril-1.24.1-1.fc34
Old package:  atril-1.24.0-4.fc34
Summary:  Document viewer
RPMs: atril atril-caja atril-devel atril-libs atril-thumbnailer
Size: 8.85 MiB
Size change:  80.66 KiB
Changelog:
  * Tue Mar 23 2021 Wolfgang Ulbrich  - 1.24.1-1
  - update to 1.24.1


Package:  bigloo-4.4b-1.fc34
Old package:  bigloo-4.4a-2.fc34
Summary:  A compiler for the Scheme programming language
RPMs: bigloo bigloo-doc bigloo-libs
Size: 90.72 MiB
Size change:  190.60 KiB
Changelog:
  * Fri Feb 05 2021 Jerry James  - 4.4b-1
  - Version 4.4b
  - Drop $date-is-gmt workaround
  - Add -div-by-zero patch to work around test failures
  - Disable tests on s390x until a Java mutex problem can be diagnosed


Package:  borgbackup-1.1.16-1.fc34
Old package:  borgbackup-1.1.15-2.fc34
Summary:  A deduplicating backup program with compression and authenticated 
encryption
RPMs: borgbackup
Size: 5.08 MiB
Size change:  30.26 KiB
Changelog:
  * Wed Feb 10 2021 Felix Schwarz  - 1.1.15-3
  - fix building with Python 3.10 (#1927146)

  * Tue Mar 23 2021 Felix Schwarz  - 1.1.16-1
  - update to 1.1.16


Package:  cinnamon-4.8.6-5.fc34
Old package:  cinnamon-4.8.6-4.fc34
Summary:  Window management and application launching for GNOME
RPMs: cinnamon cinnamon-devel-doc
Size: 8.59 MiB
Size change:  -865 B
Changelog:
  * Tue Mar 23 2021 Leigh Scott  - 4.8.6-5
  - Add gnome-system-monitor to settings


Package:  cjs-1:4.8.2-3.fc34
Old package:  cjs-1:4.8.2-2

Re: Self-introduction: TheEvilSkeleton

[Michael Schwendt]

On Sat, 27 Mar 2021 12:15:13 -0400, TheEvilSkeleton wrote:

> My alias is TheEvilSkeleton, but you can also call me Tesk,
> TheEvilSkely, Skelly, Proprietary Chrome-chan or anything close to it.  

May I ask for your real name?

Where does this come from that people introduce themselves with
pseudonyms, aliases, usernames but no real name?
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210328.n.0 changes

[Fedora Rawhide Report]

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210327.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210328.n.0

= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images:  0
Added packages:  2
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages:   23
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages:  229.93 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded packages:   375.58 MiB
Size of downgraded packages: 0 B

Size change of upgraded packages:   427.14 KiB
Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B

= ADDED IMAGES =

= DROPPED IMAGES =

= ADDED PACKAGES =
Package: rust-tokio-stream-0.1.5-1.fc35
Summary: Utilities to work with Stream and tokio
RPMs:rust-tokio-stream+default-devel rust-tokio-stream+fs-devel 
rust-tokio-stream+io-util-devel rust-tokio-stream+net-devel 
rust-tokio-stream+signal-devel rust-tokio-stream+sync-devel 
rust-tokio-stream+time-devel rust-tokio-stream+tokio-util-devel 
rust-tokio-stream-devel
Size:99.12 KiB

Package: rust-warp0.2-0.2.5-1.fc35
Summary: Serve the web at warp speeds
RPMs:rust-warp0.2+async-compression-devel rust-warp0.2+compression-devel 
rust-warp0.2+default-devel rust-warp0.2+multipart-devel rust-warp0.2-devel
Size:130.81 KiB


= DROPPED PACKAGES =

= UPGRADED PACKAGES =
Package:  GitPython-3.1.14-1.fc35
Old package:  GitPython-3.1.13-1.fc35
Summary:  Python Git Library
RPMs: python3-GitPython
Size: 237.55 KiB
Size change:  456 B
Changelog:
  * Sat Mar 27 2021 Kevin Fenzi  - 3.1.14-1
  - Update to 3.1.14. Fixes rhbz#1933468


Package:  dummy-test-package-gloster-0-3228.fc35
Old package:  dummy-test-package-gloster-0-3223.fc35
Summary:  Dummy Test Package called Gloster
RPMs: dummy-test-package-gloster
Size: 201.21 KiB
Size change:  304 B
Changelog:
  * Sat Mar 27 2021 packagerbot  - 0-3224
  - rebuilt

  * Sat Mar 27 2021 packagerbot  - 0-3225
  - rebuilt

  * Sat Mar 27 2021 packagerbot  - 0-3226
  - rebuilt

  * Sun Mar 28 2021 packagerbot  - 0-3227
  - rebuilt

  * Sun Mar 28 2021 packagerbot  - 0-3228
  - rebuilt


Package:  emacs-1:27.2-2.fc35
Old package:  emacs-1:27.2-1.fc35
Summary:  GNU Emacs text editor
RPMs: emacs emacs-common emacs-devel emacs-filesystem emacs-lucid 
emacs-nox emacs-terminal
Size: 223.93 MiB
Size change:  38.65 KiB
Changelog:
  * Sat Mar 27 2021 Peter Oliver  - 1:27.2-2
  - Prefer upstream systemd service definition.


Package:  git-extras-6.2.0-1.fc35
Old package:  git-extras-6.1.0-2.fc34
Summary:  Little git extras
RPMs: git-extras
Size: 195.96 KiB
Size change:  3.31 KiB
Changelog:
  * Fri Mar 26 2021 Fedora Release Monitoring 
 - 6.2.0-1
  - Update to 6.2.0 (#1943577)


Package:  gnome-tweaks-40.0-2.fc35
Old package:  gnome-tweaks-40~beta-4.fc35
Summary:  Customize advanced GNOME 3 options
RPMs: gnome-tweaks
Size: 316.43 KiB
Size change:  323 B
Changelog:
  * Sat Mar 27 2021 Kalev Lember  - 40.0-1
  - Update to 40.0

  * Sat Mar 27 2021 Kalev Lember  - 40.0-2
  - Use upstream appdata screenshots


Package:  gtk3-3.24.28-1.fc35
Old package:  gtk3-3.24.27-1.fc35
Summary:  GTK+ graphical user interface library
RPMs: gtk-update-icon-cache gtk3 gtk3-devel gtk3-devel-docs 
gtk3-immodule-xim gtk3-immodules gtk3-tests
Size: 75.16 MiB
Size change:  -17.16 KiB
Changelog:
  * Sat Mar 27 2021 Kalev Lember  - 3.24.28-1
  - Update to 3.24.28
  - Drop old obsoletes


Package:  libpst-0.6.76-1.fc35
Old package:  libpst-0.6.75-9.fc34
Summary:  Utilities to convert Outlook .pst files to other formats
RPMs: libpst libpst-devel libpst-devel-doc libpst-doc libpst-libs 
python3-libpst
Size: 4.59 MiB
Size change:  143.97 KiB
Changelog:
  * Sat Mar 27 2021 Carl Byington  0.6.76-1
  - Stuart C. Naifeh - fix rfc2231 encoding when saving messages to
both .eml and .msg formats.
  - fix template issue to build with gcc 11


Package:  mozo-1.24.1-1.fc35
Old package:  mozo-1.24.0-4.fc34
Summary:  MATE Desktop menu editor
RPMs: mozo
Size: 135.47 KiB
Size change:  46 B
Changelog:
  * Sat Mar 27 2021 Wolfgang Ulbrich  - 1.24.1-1
  - update to 1.24.1


Package:  mutter3.38-3.38.4-1.fc35
Old package:  mutter3.38-3.38.3-4.fc35
Summary:  Window and compositing manager based on Clutter
RPMs: mutter3.38 mutter3.38-devel mutter3.38-libs mutter3.38-tests
Size: 15.24 MiB
Size change:  -5.05 KiB
Changelog:
  * Sat Mar 27 2021 Fabio Valentini  - 3.38.4-1
  - Update to version 3.38.4.


Package:  pango-1.48.4-1.fc35
Old package:  pango-1.48.3-1.fc35
Summary:  System for layout and rendering of internationalized text
RPMs: pango pango-devel pango-tests
Size: 4.22 MiB
Size change:  1.63 KiB
Changelog:
  * Sat Mar 27 2021 Kalev Lember  - 1.48.4-1
  - Update to 1.48.4


Package:  perl-UNIVERSAL-require-0.19-1.fc35
Old package:  perl-UNIVERSAL-require-0.18-21.fc34
Summary:  Require() modules from a variable
RPMs: perl

Fedora-Cloud-32-20210328.0 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

No missing expected images.

Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210327.0):

ID: 833071  Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833071
ID: 833078  Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833078

Passed openQA tests: 6/7 (x86_64), 6/7 (aarch64)
-- 
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Fedora-Cloud-33-20210328.0 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

No missing expected images.

Failed openQA tests: 1/7 (aarch64)

New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210327.0):

ID: 833060  Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_update_cli@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833060

Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210327.0):

ID: 833057  Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833057
ID: 833064  Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/833064

Passed openQA tests: 6/7 (x86_64), 5/7 (aarch64)
-- 
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure