date:20220506

Fedora-IoT-37-20220506.0 compose check report

2022-05-06 Thread Fedora compose checker

Missing expected images:

Iot dvd x86_64
Iot dvd aarch64

Failed openQA tests: 2/15 (aarch64)

ID: 1258449 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1258449
ID: 1258462 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso release_identification@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1258462

Passed openQA tests: 15/15 (x86_64), 13/15 (aarch64)
-- 
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Please help us test: Fedora Media Writer 5.0

2022-05-06 Thread Jan Grulich

Alright, I believe this was very useful as we fixed countless issues today. 
Thank you all who participated.

Here is latest scratch build for the weekend testers: 
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=86732788
And other builds can be found here: 
https://github.com/FedoraQt/MediaWriter/releases

I will take a break now as today was quite exhausting :). 
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Fedora-Rawhide-20220506.n.0 compose check report

2022-05-06 Thread Fedora compose checker

Missing expected images:

Minimal raw-xz armhfp

Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
8 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** 
below

Failed openQA tests: 17/231 (x86_64), 35/161 (aarch64)

New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20220505.n.0):

ID: 1257505 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1257505
ID: 1257506 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1257506
ID: 1257563 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default@uefi **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1257563
ID: 1257564 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1257564
ID: 1257571 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso gnome_text_editor
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1257571
ID: 1257574 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1257574
ID: 1257606 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1257606
ID: 1257609 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_login
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1257609
ID: 1257647 Test: aarch64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1257647
ID: 1257657 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_sssd@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1257657
ID: 1257659 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1257659
ID: 1257662 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1257662
ID: 1257706 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_printing@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1257706
ID: 1257707 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz gnome_text_editor@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1257707
ID: 1257709 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz 
desktop_printing_builtin@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1257709
ID: 1257721 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_browser@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1257721
ID: 1257790 Test: x86_64 universal install_mirrorlist_graphical **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1257790
ID: 1257794 Test: x86_64 universal install_kickstart_firewall_configured 
**GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1257794
ID: 1257815 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_kde_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1257815
ID: 1257836 Test: x86_64 universal install_kickstart_user_creation 
**GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1257836
ID: 1257838 Test: x86_64 universal install_kickstart_firewall_disabled 
**GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1257838
ID: 1257839 Test: x86_64 universal install_kickstart_hdd
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1257839
ID: 1257857 Test: aarch64 universal 
install_kickstart_firewall_configured@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1257857
ID: 1257862 Test: aarch64 universal install_mirrorlist_graphical@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1257862
ID: 1258420 Test: aarch64 universal install_rescue_encrypted@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1258420

Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20220505.n.0):

ID: 1257648 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso 
install_btrfs_preserve_home_uefi@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1257648
ID: 1257650 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_btrfs_preserve_home@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1257650
ID: 1257676 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_client@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1257676
ID: 1257687 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_server@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1257687
ID: 1257730 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 
base_package_install_remove@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1257730
ID: 1257743 Test: x86_64 Workstation-upgrade gnome_text_editor
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1257743
ID: 1257748 Test: x86_64 Workstation-upgrade desktop_fprint
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1257748
ID: 1257753 Test: aarch64 Workstation-upgrade upgrade_desktop_64bit@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1257753
ID: 1257831 Test: x86_64 universal install_kickstart_nfs
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1257831
ID: 1257854 Test: aarch64 universal install_european_language@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1257854
ID: 1257860 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1257860
ID: 1257866 Test: aarch64 universal

Fedora-36-20220506.n.0 compose check report

2022-05-06 Thread Fedora compose checker

No missing expected images.

Failed openQA tests: 8/229 (x86_64), 7/161 (aarch64)

New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-36-20220505.n.0):

ID: 1258026 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso release_identification
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1258026
ID: 1258030 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1258030
ID: 1258076 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso 
install_repository_hd_variation@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1258076
ID: 1258112 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_printing@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1258112
ID: 1258115 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz 
desktop_printing_builtin@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1258115
ID: 1258201 Test: x86_64 universal support_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1258201
ID: 1258247 Test: x86_64 universal install_iscsi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1258247
ID: 1258294 Test: aarch64 universal install_repository_http_graphical@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1258294

Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-36-20220505.n.0):

ID: 1257979 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso gnome_text_editor
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1257979
ID: 1258014 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1258014
ID: 1258089 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_basic@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1258089
ID: 1258113 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz gnome_text_editor@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1258113
ID: 1258146 Test: x86_64 Workstation-upgrade apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1258146
ID: 1258149 Test: x86_64 Workstation-upgrade gnome_text_editor
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1258149
ID: 1258168 Test: aarch64 Workstation-upgrade gnome_text_editor@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1258168

Soft failed openQA tests: 5/161 (aarch64), 10/229 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

New soft failures (same test not soft failed in Fedora-36-20220505.n.0):

ID: 1258132 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1258132

Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-36-20220505.n.0):

ID: 1257982 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1257982
ID: 1257986 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_browser
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1257986
ID: 1257997 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso eog
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1257997
ID: 1258007 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_browser
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1258007
ID: 1258024 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso eog
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1258024
ID: 1258029 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso desktop_browser
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1258029
ID: 1258031 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso evince
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1258031
ID: 1258032 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso gnome_text_editor
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1258032
ID: 1258038 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1258038
ID: 1258127 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_browser@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1258127
ID: 1258128 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz eog@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1258128
ID: 1258140 Test: x86_64 Workstation-upgrade desktop_browser
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1258140
ID: 1258162 Test: aarch64 Workstation-upgrade desktop_browser@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1258162
ID: 1258175 Test: aarch64 Workstation-upgrade eog@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1258175

Passed openQA tests: 149/161 (aarch64), 211/229 (x86_64)

New passes (same test not passed in Fedora-36-20220505.n.0):

ID: 1258060 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso 
install_blivet_btrfs_preserve_home_uefi@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1258060
ID: 1258189 Test: x86_64 universal install_delete_pata@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1258189
ID: 1258234 Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1258234
ID: 1258266 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1258266
ID: 1258267 Test: aarch64 universal install_blivet_lvmthin@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1258267
ID: 1258276 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_realmd_client@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1258276
ID: 1258277 Test: aarch64 universal

Re: Please help us test: Fedora Media Writer 5.0

2022-05-06 Thread Kamil Paral

On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 3:49 PM Jan Grulich  wrote:

> New scratch build:
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=86726403
>
> 


A fixed link:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=86726403
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Please help us test: Fedora Media Writer 5.0

2022-05-06 Thread Jan Grulich

New scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=86726403
Flatpak/Windows/MacOS builds here: 
https://github.com/FedoraQt/MediaWriter/releases

This should fix small dialogs with bigger fonts, broken Fedora Server 
downloads, uses exFAT for Windows drive restoration and fixes MacOS build on M1 
Macs.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Please help us test: Fedora Media Writer 5.0

2022-05-06 Thread Lukas Ruzicka

Sorry, I already opened it. Feel free to close it then.

On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 2:36 PM Jan Grulich  wrote:

> I have a fix already for the "Fedora Server" showing "version 0". No need
> to open a bug for that.
> ___
> test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
>

-- 

Lukáš Růžička

FEDORA QE, RHCE

Red Hat

Purkyňova 115

612 45 Brno - Královo Pole

lruzi...@redhat.com
TRIED AND PERSONALLY TESTED, ERGO TRUSTED. 
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Fedora 36 compose report: 20220506.n.0 changes

2022-05-06 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report

OLD: Fedora-36-20220505.n.0
NEW: Fedora-36-20220506.n.0

= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images:  0
Added packages:  0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages:   6
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages:  0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded packages:   158.52 MiB
Size of downgraded packages: 0 B

Size change of upgraded packages:   1.35 MiB
Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B

= ADDED IMAGES =

= DROPPED IMAGES =

= ADDED PACKAGES =

= DROPPED PACKAGES =

= UPGRADED PACKAGES =
Package:  aws-2020-7.fc36
Old package:  aws-2020-6.fc36
Summary:  Ada Web Server
RPMs: aws aws-devel aws-doc aws-tools
Size: 21.04 MiB
Size change:  3.13 KiB
Changelog:
  * Tue May 03 2022 Mamoru TASAKA  - 2020-7
  - Rebuild for new gnat


Package:  gnome-photos-42.0-2.fc36
Old package:  gnome-photos-42.0-1.fc36
Summary:  Access, organize and share your photos on GNOME
RPMs: gnome-photos gnome-photos-tests
Size: 4.21 MiB
Size change:  8.70 KiB
Changelog:
  * Tue May 03 2022 Ray Strode  - 42.0-2
  - Add workaround for albumn display problems
Related: #2079344


Package:  livecd-tools-1:30.0-1.fc36
Old package:  livecd-tools-1:28.3-5.fc36
Summary:  Tools for building live CDs
RPMs: livecd-iso-to-mediums livecd-tools python-imgcreate-sysdeps 
python3-imgcreate
Size: 949.94 KiB
Size change:  53.17 KiB
Changelog:
  * Sun Apr 24 2022 Neal Gompa  - 1:29.0-1
  - Release 29.0 (ngompa13)
  - Makefile: Drop creating signed tags (ngompa13)
  - Preload the libnss_systemd library (#2007045) (sergey)
  - livecd-iso-to-disk, editliveos: Add option to skip macboot.img processing.
(fgrose)
  - Copy 'unicode.pf2' from correct path (zhanggyb)
  - editliveos: Refresh vmlinuz & initrd.img files upon kernel updates. (fgrose)
  - livecd-iso-to-disk & editliveos: Preserve extra-kernel-args from source.
(fgrose)
  - add livenet dracut module to allow for pxe boot (sobjerke)
  - switch from authconfig to authselect (pbrezina)
  - live.py: Support either /images or /isolinux directories for efi images.
(fgrose)
  - livecd-iso-to-disk & editliveos: Expand partitioning & filesystem support
(fgrose)
  - make live image the default boot option (sobjerke)
  - Modernize detection of checkisomd5 (m.novosyolov)

  * Tue Apr 26 2022 Neal Gompa  - 1:30.0-1
  - Release 30.0 (ngompa13)
  - imgcreate/fs.py: abort on hard-unmount failure (lersek)
  - imgcreate/util: Fix errors import (T-vK) (#2078710)


Package:  matreshka-20.1-10.fc36
Old package:  matreshka-20.1-8.fc35
Summary:  Set of Ada libraries to help to develop information systems
RPMs: matreshka matreshka-amf matreshka-amf-dd matreshka-amf-dd-devel 
matreshka-amf-devel matreshka-amf-mofext matreshka-amf-mofext-devel 
matreshka-amf-ocl matreshka-amf-ocl-devel matreshka-amf-uml 
matreshka-amf-uml-devel matreshka-amf-utp matreshka-amf-utp-devel 
matreshka-devel matreshka-fastcgi matreshka-fastcgi-devel 
matreshka-servlet-devel matreshka-servlet-lib matreshka-soap-core 
matreshka-soap-core-devel matreshka-soap-wsse matreshka-soap-wsse-devel 
matreshka-spikedog-api-devel matreshka-spikedog-api-lib matreshka-spikedog-awsd 
matreshka-spikedog-awsd-devel matreshka-spikedog-core-devel 
matreshka-spikedog-core-lib matreshka-sql-core matreshka-sql-core-devel 
matreshka-sql-mysql matreshka-sql-mysql-devel matreshka-sql-postgresql 
matreshka-sql-postgresql-devel matreshka-sql-sqlite matreshka-sql-sqlite-devel 
matreshka-xml matreshka-xml-devel
Size: 119.62 MiB
Size change:  1.27 MiB
Changelog:
  * Thu Jan 20 2022 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
20.1-9
  - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_36_Mass_Rebuild

  * Tue May 03 2022 Mamoru TASAKA  - 20.1-10
  - Workaround on i686 for not detecting SSE builtins


Package:  templates_parser-11.8.0-30.fc36
Old package:  templates_parser-11.8.0-29.fc36
Summary:  AWS templates engine
RPMs: templates_parser templates_parser-devel templates_parser-tools
Size: 3.58 MiB
Size change:  -435 B
Changelog:
  * Tue May 03 2022 Mamoru TASAKA  - 11.8.0-30
  - Rebuild for new gnat


Package:  wpa_supplicant-1:2.10-4.fc36
Old package:  wpa_supplicant-1:2.10-2.fc36
Summary:  WPA/WPA2/IEEE 802.1X Supplicant
RPMs: wpa_supplicant wpa_supplicant-gui
Size: 9.13 MiB
Size change:  14.26 KiB
Changelog:
  * Wed Jan 26 2022 Michael Yartys  - 1:2.10-3
  - Enable Operating Channel Validation (OCV) support

  * Mon May 02 2022 Adam Williamson  - 1:2.10-4
  - Allow legacy renegotiation for bad PEAP servers (James Ralston) (#2072070)



= DOWNGRADED PACKAGES =
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List G

Re: Please help us test: Fedora Media Writer 5.0

2022-05-06 Thread Jan Grulich

I have a fix already for the "Fedora Server" showing "version 0". No need to 
open a bug for that.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Please help us test: Fedora Media Writer 5.0

2022-05-06 Thread Sumantro Mukherjee

All the spins, take F35 as default value during download and not F36 beta
as official editions do.

On Fri, May 6, 2022, 17:58 Sumantro Mukherjee  wrote:

> Tested on a HP Omen with Nvidia GEFORCE GTX 1650 running windows 11. All
> looks good. I am able to download the workstation, write it and boot with
> live iso. If the write is interrupted due to flash drive eject. It
> automatically re-writes.
> The flash drive cleanup works fine and as expected.
>
>
> On Fri, May 6, 2022, 17:43 Kamil Paral  wrote:
>
>> On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 1:56 PM Lukas Ruzicka  wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>> when I want to download a Server image, it does not show anything, just
>>> a 0.
>>>
>>> https://imgur.com/a/ZoOE1Y1
>>>
>>
>> Ouch, that's a bummer. Can you please create a report at
>> https://github.com/FedoraQt/MediaWriter/issues ? This is the first
>> serious regression compared to FMW 4.2 and a current showstopper, I believe.
>> ___
>> test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Fedora Code of Conduct:
>> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>> List Archives:
>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
>> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
>>
>
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Please help us test: Fedora Media Writer 5.0

2022-05-06 Thread Sumantro Mukherjee

Tested on a HP Omen with Nvidia GEFORCE GTX 1650 running windows 11. All
looks good. I am able to download the workstation, write it and boot with
live iso. If the write is interrupted due to flash drive eject. It
automatically re-writes.
The flash drive cleanup works fine and as expected.


On Fri, May 6, 2022, 17:43 Kamil Paral  wrote:

> On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 1:56 PM Lukas Ruzicka  wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>> when I want to download a Server image, it does not show anything, just a
>> 0.
>>
>> https://imgur.com/a/ZoOE1Y1
>>
>
> Ouch, that's a bummer. Can you please create a report at
> https://github.com/FedoraQt/MediaWriter/issues ? This is the first
> serious regression compared to FMW 4.2 and a current showstopper, I believe.
> ___
> test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
>
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Please help us test: Fedora Media Writer 5.0

2022-05-06 Thread Kamil Paral

On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 1:56 PM Lukas Ruzicka  wrote:

> Hello,
> when I want to download a Server image, it does not show anything, just a
> 0.
>
> https://imgur.com/a/ZoOE1Y1
>

Ouch, that's a bummer. Can you please create a report at
https://github.com/FedoraQt/MediaWriter/issues ? This is the first serious
regression compared to FMW 4.2 and a current showstopper, I believe.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Please help us test: Fedora Media Writer 5.0

2022-05-06 Thread Lukas Ruzicka

Also, there is no way to download and create a Netinst image. I understand
that this is a feature, probably, but there might be situations when this
would come in handy.

On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 1:56 PM Lukas Ruzicka  wrote:

> Hello,
> when I want to download a Server image, it does not show anything, just a
> 0.
>
> https://imgur.com/a/ZoOE1Y1
>
> On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 1:39 PM Kamil Paral  wrote:
>
>> I tested the Windows version on Windows 10, and found FMW to be working
>> well, except perhaps one minor issue:
>>
>> Restoring a flash drive on Windows creates a FAT16 partition, which is
>> unusable on larger drives
>> https://github.com/FedoraQt/MediaWriter/issues/464
>>
>>
>> ___
>> test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Fedora Code of Conduct:
>> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>> List Archives:
>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
>> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Lukáš Růžička
>
> FEDORA QE, RHCE
>
> Red Hat
>
> 
>
> Purkyňova 115
>
> 612 45 Brno - Královo Pole
>
> lruzi...@redhat.com
> TRIED AND PERSONALLY TESTED, ERGO TRUSTED. 
>

-- 

Lukáš Růžička

FEDORA QE, RHCE

Red Hat

Purkyňova 115

612 45 Brno - Královo Pole

lruzi...@redhat.com
TRIED AND PERSONALLY TESTED, ERGO TRUSTED. 
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Please help us test: Fedora Media Writer 5.0

2022-05-06 Thread Lukas Ruzicka

Hello,
when I want to download a Server image, it does not show anything, just a 0.

https://imgur.com/a/ZoOE1Y1

On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 1:39 PM Kamil Paral  wrote:

> I tested the Windows version on Windows 10, and found FMW to be working
> well, except perhaps one minor issue:
>
> Restoring a flash drive on Windows creates a FAT16 partition, which is
> unusable on larger drives
> https://github.com/FedoraQt/MediaWriter/issues/464
>
>
> ___
> test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
>

-- 

Lukáš Růžička

FEDORA QE, RHCE

Red Hat

Purkyňova 115

612 45 Brno - Královo Pole

lruzi...@redhat.com
TRIED AND PERSONALLY TESTED, ERGO TRUSTED. 
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Please help us test: Fedora Media Writer 5.0

2022-05-06 Thread Kamil Paral

I tested the Windows version on Windows 10, and found FMW to be working
well, except perhaps one minor issue:

Restoring a flash drive on Windows creates a FAT16 partition, which is
unusable on larger drives
https://github.com/FedoraQt/MediaWriter/issues/464
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Proposal: changes to "default application functionality" release criteria

2022-05-06 Thread Neal Gompa

On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 7:29 AM Matthias Clasen  wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 1:23 PM Matthew Miller  
> wrote:
>
> Wading into this discussion pretty late... there's far too much "GNOME does 
> this" or "GNOME wants that" in this discussion.
>
> That is really not how it works, neither for GNOME nor for Fedora - its down 
> to small teams and individual maintainers to
> make changes and decisions. For improving the QA situation between upstream 
> GNOME and downstream Fedora, a good
> team to talk to is the GNOME release team of which both Michael and I happen 
> to be members.
>
>>
>> > Testing that is much more useful to upstream than testing Rawhide,
>> > because we certainly aren't updating all the bits of GNOME in Rawhide
>> > nightly. But if it's not built on Fedora (I don't think it is), it may
>> > well have differences in theme and font configuration that might make
>> > Fedora's openQA needles not match, which is the problem I'm concerned
>> > about with sharing the tests.
>>
>> Could we (GNOME and Fedora in collaboration) set up something where they
>> _are_ updating everything on top of Rawhide nightly? If not instead of GNOME
>> OS, at least alongside it?
>>
>
> This would be a useful discussion to have, Having it in a bof at guadec 
> sounds great.
>

One of the things we're working on in the KDE SIG is eventually
auto-building all our KDE software in a COPR on a regular schedule,
with the goal of eventually producing something that we could wire up
to run through OpenQA tests using that COPR repo for precisely this
purpose. I think it would absolutely make sense if the folks
maintaining GNOME did the same thing, since they're both release
blocking desktops.


-- 
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Proposal: changes to "default application functionality" release criteria

2022-05-06 Thread Matthias Clasen

On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 1:23 PM Matthew Miller 
wrote:

Wading into this discussion pretty late... there's far too much "GNOME does
this" or "GNOME wants that" in this discussion.

That is really not how it works, neither for GNOME nor for Fedora - its
down to small teams and individual maintainers to
make changes and decisions. For improving the QA situation between upstream
GNOME and downstream Fedora, a good
team to talk to is the GNOME release team of which both Michael and I
happen to be members.

> > Testing that is much more useful to upstream than testing Rawhide,
> > because we certainly aren't updating all the bits of GNOME in Rawhide
> > nightly. But if it's not built on Fedora (I don't think it is), it may
> > well have differences in theme and font configuration that might make
> > Fedora's openQA needles not match, which is the problem I'm concerned
> > about with sharing the tests.
>
> Could we (GNOME and Fedora in collaboration) set up something where they
> _are_ updating everything on top of Rawhide nightly? If not instead of
> GNOME
> OS, at least alongside it?
>
>
This would be a useful discussion to have, Having it in a bof at guadec
sounds great.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Please help us test: Fedora Media Writer 5.0

2022-05-06 Thread Jan Grulich

> I tested the RPM and Flatpak version on Fedora 36 Workstation, using
> Thinkpad P1 gen3 with an Intel graphics, and so far I found these issues:
> 
> "Intel 64bit" as a hardware architecture is confusing
> https://github.com/FedoraQt/MediaWriter/issues/451

Fixed.

> Beta versions shouldn't be offered by default
> https://github.com/FedoraQt/MediaWriter/issues/452

Fixed.

> "Delete after writing" is always on after first use
> https://github.com/FedoraQt/MediaWriter/issues/453

Fixed.

> "Delete download after writing" doesn't make sense when selecting a custom
> ISO
> https://github.com/FedoraQt/MediaWriter/issues/455

Fixed.

> A failure in writing is reported as success (!!)
> https://github.com/FedoraQt/MediaWriter/issues/456
> 
> Flatpak version doesn't show notifications
> https://github.com/FedoraQt/MediaWriter/issues/457

Fixed.

> FMW allows to write a corrupted image (somehow)
> https://github.com/FedoraQt/MediaWriter/issues/458
> 
> Unable to download an image from a custom URL
> https://github.com/FedoraQt/MediaWriter/issues/460
> 
> Renewing a download makes the Writing dialog stuck
> https://github.com/FedoraQt/MediaWriter/issues/461

Fixed.

> Can't handle a corrupted downloaded, Retry does nothing useful
> https://github.com/FedoraQt/MediaWriter/issues/462
> 
> While that's a lot of issues, many of them are already present in current
> stable FMW 4.2, or they're not critical for FMW 5.0 release once F36 is
> out. So, so far, I haven't found a show-stopper for FMW 5.0.

A new scratch build with above mentioned fixes is here:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=86719554

And updated Flatpak build on the usual place:
https://github.com/FedoraQt/MediaWriter/releases
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20220506.n.0 changes

2022-05-06 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220505.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220506.n.0

= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images:  0
Added packages:  9
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages:   90
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages:  372.80 KiB
Size of dropped packages:104.38 KiB
Size of upgraded packages:   3.33 GiB
Size of downgraded packages: 0 B

Size change of upgraded packages:   -4.93 MiB
Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B

= ADDED IMAGES =

= DROPPED IMAGES =

= ADDED PACKAGES =
Package: rust-binascii-0.1.4-1.fc37
Summary: Rust binascii operations
RPMs:rust-binascii+decode-devel rust-binascii+default-devel 
rust-binascii+encode-devel rust-binascii-devel
Size:34.85 KiB

Package: rust-is-terminal-0.1.0-1.fc37
Summary: Test whether a given stream is a terminal
RPMs:rust-is-terminal+default-devel rust-is-terminal-devel
Size:20.28 KiB

Package: rust-sharded-slab-0.1.4-1.fc37
Summary: Lock-free concurrent slab
RPMs:rust-sharded-slab+default-devel rust-sharded-slab-devel
Size:57.55 KiB

Package: rust-strum0.21-0.21.0-1.fc37
Summary: Helpful macros for working with enums and strings
RPMs:rust-strum0.21+default-devel rust-strum0.21+derive-devel 
rust-strum0.21+strum_macros-devel rust-strum0.21-devel
Size:34.32 KiB

Package: rust-strum_macros0.21-0.21.1-1.fc37
Summary: Helpful macros for working with enums and strings
RPMs:rust-strum_macros0.21+default-devel rust-strum_macros0.21-devel
Size:32.75 KiB

Package: rust-tracing-log-0.1.3-1.fc37
Summary: Provides compatibility between tracing and the log crate
RPMs:rust-tracing-log+default-devel rust-tracing-log+env_logger-devel 
rust-tracing-log+log-tracer-devel rust-tracing-log+std-devel 
rust-tracing-log+trace-logger-devel rust-tracing-log-devel
Size:64.14 KiB

Package: rust-ubyte-0.10.1-1.fc37
Summary: Rust no_std library for byte units
RPMs:rust-ubyte+default-devel rust-ubyte+serde-devel rust-ubyte-devel
Size:35.31 KiB

Package: rust-xxhash-c-sys-0.8.3-1.fc37
Summary: Bindings to xxhash
RPMs:rust-xxhash-c-sys+default-devel rust-xxhash-c-sys-devel
Size:19.08 KiB

Package: rust-xxhash-rust-0.8.5-1.fc37
Summary: Implementation of xxhash
RPMs:rust-xxhash-rust+const_xxh3-devel rust-xxhash-rust+const_xxh32-devel 
rust-xxhash-rust+const_xxh64-devel rust-xxhash-rust+default-devel 
rust-xxhash-rust+xxh3-devel rust-xxhash-rust+xxh32-devel 
rust-xxhash-rust+xxh64-devel rust-xxhash-rust-devel
Size:74.53 KiB


= DROPPED PACKAGES =
Package: mod_geoip-1.2.10-15.fc36
Summary: GeoIP module for the Apache HTTP Server
RPMs:mod_geoip
Size:104.38 KiB


= UPGRADED PACKAGES =
Package:  Lmod-8.7.2-1.fc37
Old package:  Lmod-8.7.1-1.fc37
Summary:  Environmental Modules System in Lua
RPMs: Lmod
Size: 914.74 KiB
Size change:  792 B
Changelog:
  * Fri May 06 2022 Orion Poplawski  - 8.7.2-1
  - Update to 8.7.2


Package:  accel-config-3.4.6.4-2.fc37
Old package:  accel-config-3.4.6.3-1.fc37
Summary:  Configure accelerator subsystem devices
RPMs: accel-config accel-config-devel accel-config-libs
Size: 304.72 KiB
Size change:  707 B
Changelog:
  * Fri May 06 2022 Jun Miao  - 3.4.6.4-2
  - Update to v3.4.6.4 release


Package:  authselect-1.4.0-1.fc37
Old package:  authselect-1.3.0-10.fc37
Summary:  Configures authentication and identity sources from supported 
profiles
RPMs: authselect authselect-devel authselect-libs
Size: 1.76 MiB
Size change:  70.71 KiB
Changelog:
  * Thu May 05 2022 Pavel B??ezina  - 1.4.0-1
  - Rebase to 1.3.0


Package:  babeld-1.12-1.fc37
Old package:  babeld-1.11-1.fc37
Summary:  Ad-hoc network routing daemon
RPMs: babeld
Size: 409.43 KiB
Size change:  5.31 KiB
Changelog:
  * Thu May 05 2022 Gwyn Ciesla  - 1.12-1
  - 1.12


Package:  cantera-2.6.0-21.fc37
Old package:  cantera-2.6.0-18.fc37
Summary:  Chemical kinetics, thermodynamics, and transport tool suite
RPMs: cantera-common cantera-devel cantera-static python3-cantera
Size: 13.37 MiB
Size change:  -14.88 MiB
Changelog:
  * Tue May 03 2022 Mark E. Fuller  2.6.0-20
  - exclude aarch64, ppcle64 due to failing test (rtol)

  * Thu May 05 2022 Mark E. Fuller  2.6.0-21
  - fix typo in excludearch


Package:  ceph-2:17.2.0-3.fc37
Old package:  ceph-2:17.2.0-1.fc37
Summary:  User space components of the Ceph file system
RPMs: ceph ceph-base ceph-common ceph-fuse ceph-grafana-dashboards 
ceph-immutable-object-cache ceph-mds ceph-mgr ceph-mgr-cephadm 
ceph-mgr-dashboard ceph-mgr-diskprediction-local ceph-mgr-k8sevents 
ceph-mgr-modules-core ceph-mgr-rook ceph-mon ceph-osd ceph-prometheus-alerts 
ceph-radosgw ceph-resource-agents ceph-selinux ceph-test ceph-volume cephadm 
cephfs-java cephfs-mirror cephfs-shell cephfs-top libcephfs-devel libcephfs2 
libcephfs_jni-devel libcephfs_jni1 libcephsqlite libcephsqlite-devel 
librados-devel

Re: Please help us test: Fedora Media Writer 5.0

2022-05-06 Thread Kamil Paral

I tested the RPM and Flatpak version on Fedora 36 Workstation, using
Thinkpad P1 gen3 with an Intel graphics, and so far I found these issues:

"Intel 64bit" as a hardware architecture is confusing
https://github.com/FedoraQt/MediaWriter/issues/451

Beta versions shouldn't be offered by default
https://github.com/FedoraQt/MediaWriter/issues/452

"Delete after writing" is always on after first use
https://github.com/FedoraQt/MediaWriter/issues/453

"Delete download after writing" doesn't make sense when selecting a custom
ISO
https://github.com/FedoraQt/MediaWriter/issues/455

A failure in writing is reported as success (!!)
https://github.com/FedoraQt/MediaWriter/issues/456

Flatpak version doesn't show notifications
https://github.com/FedoraQt/MediaWriter/issues/457

FMW allows to write a corrupted image (somehow)
https://github.com/FedoraQt/MediaWriter/issues/458

Unable to download an image from a custom URL
https://github.com/FedoraQt/MediaWriter/issues/460

Renewing a download makes the Writing dialog stuck
https://github.com/FedoraQt/MediaWriter/issues/461

Can't handle a corrupted downloaded, Retry does nothing useful
https://github.com/FedoraQt/MediaWriter/issues/462

While that's a lot of issues, many of them are already present in current
stable FMW 4.2, or they're not critical for FMW 5.0 release once F36 is
out. So, so far, I haven't found a show-stopper for FMW 5.0.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Fedora-Cloud-34-20220506.0 compose check report

2022-05-06 Thread Fedora compose checker

No missing expected images.

Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220505.0):

ID: 1257491 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1257491
ID: 1257500 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1257500

Passed openQA tests: 7/8 (x86_64), 7/8 (aarch64)
-- 
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Please help us test: Fedora Media Writer 5.0

2022-05-06 Thread Kamil Paral

On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 9:29 AM Alex Gurenko via test <
test@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:

> Generally seems to be working as expected. But here are some notes after
> testing X86_64 RPM version on F36 Beta KDE spin:
>   - qt6-qtsvg was missing as reported already, so first screenshots didn't
> have any graphics
>   - Restore flash drive shows a failure, seems like the partition is
> destroyed, but new one fails to be created (screenshot in a folder)
> - Upon re-plug restore option does not appear
>   - Note: Downloading beta, downloads 1.4 image, not 1.5 (as of 9:15
> 06.05.2022)
>

That's correct, F36 Beta had 1.4 version in the filename. The Final RCs
will not show up there until the official announcement next week. But you
can hack it manually using the guide linked in the original email in this
thread.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Please help us test: Fedora Media Writer 5.0

2022-05-06 Thread Jan Grulich

Update:

Here is a new scratch build adding qt6-qtsvg as a dependency:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=86712414

And updated Flatpak build with updated AppStream metadata to show correct 
version is on the same place:
https://github.com/FedoraQt/MediaWriter/releases
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Please help us test: Fedora Media Writer 5.0

2022-05-06 Thread Jan Grulich

Hi,

> Generally seems to be working as expected. But here are some notes after 
> testing X86_64
> RPM version on F36 Beta KDE spin:
>   - qt6-qtsvg was missing as reported already, so first screenshots didn't 
> have any
> graphics
>   - Restore flash drive shows a failure, seems like the partition is 
> destroyed, but new
> one fails to be created (screenshot in a folder)

Can you try to restore it with some partition manager and try again (to write 
and restore)? And if it fails again, can you try in the old FMW. after 
restoring in some other partition manager and making a new write? We didn't 
really touch the code responsible for restoration so I would expect it to 
behave the same as with old FMW. 

> - Upon re-plug restore option does not appear
>   - Note: Downloading beta, downloads 1.4 image, not 1.5 (as of 9:15 
> 06.05.2022)
> 
> Downloaded and locally stored images written correctly, so no issues there.
> 
> Some screenshots here: 
> https://drive.protonmail.com/urls/HW3YC020A0#GSjTU0JxWz7k

Thank you for testing.

Regards,
Jan
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Please help us test: Fedora Media Writer 5.0

2022-05-06 Thread Alex Gurenko via test

Generally seems to be working as expected. But here are some notes after 
testing X86_64 RPM version on F36 Beta KDE spin:
  - qt6-qtsvg was missing as reported already, so first screenshots didn't have 
any graphics
  - Restore flash drive shows a failure, seems like the partition is destroyed, 
but new one fails to be created (screenshot in a folder)
- Upon re-plug restore option does not appear
  - Note: Downloading beta, downloads 1.4 image, not 1.5 (as of 9:15 06.05.2022)

Downloaded and locally stored images written correctly, so no issues there.

Some screenshots here: https://drive.protonmail.com/urls/HW3YC020A0#GSjTU0JxWz7k
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Please help us test: Fedora Media Writer 5.0

2022-05-06 Thread Jan Grulich

> On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 1:06 PM Kamil Paral  
> I tested the RPM and the Flatpak on Fedora Workstation 36 on an Intel
> GPU. I flashed Fedora Kinoite 36 Beta to a USB stick using it
> successfully.
> 
> With both the RPM and the Flatpak, I noticed that it doesn't follow
> the light/dark preference from GNOME, but that's probably
> QGnomePlatform there.
> 
> With the RPM, the panels don't seem to have any imagery? The picture
> of the main window in the readme has a graphic that doesn't show up on
> my installed version. No graphic on the downloading and writing panels
> either. At the end when it's finished, the main window still says writing to
> disk, even though the notification was pushed that it finished, so it
> didn't switch to the "finished" window pane. Closing it in this
> scenario seems harmless, but confusing. Otherwise, it seems to work fine.
> 

Missing runtime dependency on qt6-qtsvg. I will fix that. Not sure about the 
wrong state, I will try to reproduce.

> When testing the Flatpak, it seems to work the same, except the
> imagery shows up and the finished writing panel shows up. The Flatpak
> downloads ISOs much more slowly than the RPM (like several orders
> slower!).
> 

This is weird, I'm now testing both and have same results. As the code for
download hasn't change since the old FMW version I don't think this is a 
new issue in FMW 5.0.0.

> Are the RPM and the Flatpak built from the same commit? If so, there
> might be a packaging bug in the RPM one.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Please help us test: Fedora Media Writer 5.0

2022-05-06 Thread Kamil Paral

On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 10:11 PM Yosuke Matsumura 
wrote:

> Tested on Fedora 36 Kinoite - Flatpak downloaded from (
> https://github.com/FedoraQt/MediaWriter/releases/download/latest-flatpak/org.fedoraproject.MediaWriter.flatpak).
> System Info (https://paste.centos.org/view/2ecf0d35)
>
> * After installation of the flatpak, doing a `flatpak list` shows that the
> app is version 4.2.0. But I'm assuming that it's the 5.0 version since the
> UI is different than what I'm used to.
>
> * The Write Options Screen has the UI overflow below the bottom of the
> window and the window cannot be scrolled or resized to view it. (
> https://pasteboard.co/qBWgpml9QpJf.png)
>
> * The Downloads Screen has an icon mid/center, but it is very small and
> can't see what it is. (https://pasteboard.co/eAOAcGJsOmKm.png)
>
> * Canceling a download. Dialog box is cut off, and cannot scroll
> down/resize window to confirm cancel. (
> https://pasteboard.co/uGXAtOM7dhsZ.png)
>
> * Restore Screen. Same window size issue. (
> https://pasteboard.co/xMGItvM5ci04.png)
>
> * Deleting media after write. I couldn't see whether the option for Delete
> download after writing was checked due to window layout (
> https://pasteboard.co/cYDUEmEr89ED.png). Nevertheless, on the Writing
> media screen, the text "This will delete installation media from your
> drive" appears (https://pasteboard.co/ZJnHjfBj1Yvj.png). If the Delete
> Download button was not active, this message shouldn't appear. If the
> Delete Download was active, and I couldn't see it, the actual behavior is
> wrong because the media was *not* deleted from my drive after the write
> completed.
>

Hi Yosuke, thanks for a great feedback! All those images give me HTTP 502.
Perhaps the site is down just temporarily. If it is not, and you still have
the screenshots available, could you upload them elsewhere? Or,
alternatively, report those issues individually at
https://github.com/FedoraQt/MediaWriter/issues and send the links here?
Thanks a lot!
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Please help us test: Fedora Media Writer 5.0

2022-05-06 Thread Jan Grulich

Hi,

can you upload images somewhere else? They cannot be opened.

> Tested on Fedora 36 Kinoite - Flatpak downloaded from
> (https://github.com/FedoraQt/MediaWriter/releases/download/latest-flatpak/...).
> System Info (https://paste.centos.org/view/2ecf0d35)
> 
> * After installation of the flatpak, doing a `flatpak list` shows that the 
> app is version
> 4.2.0. But I'm assuming that it's the 5.0 version since the UI is different 
> than
> what I'm used to.
> 

Good catch. We forgot to update AppStream metadata.

> * The Write Options Screen has the UI overflow below the bottom of the window 
> and the
> window cannot be scrolled or resized to view it. 
> (https://pasteboard.co/qBWgpml9QpJf.png)
> 
> * The Downloads Screen has an icon mid/center, but it is very small and can't 
> see what
> it is. (https://pasteboard.co/eAOAcGJsOmKm.png)
> 
> * Canceling a download. Dialog box is cut off, and cannot scroll down/resize 
> window to
> confirm cancel. (https://pasteboard.co/uGXAtOM7dhsZ.png)
> 
> * Restore Screen. Same window size issue. 
> (https://pasteboard.co/xMGItvM5ci04.png)
> 
> * Deleting media after write. I couldn't see whether the option for Delete 
> download
> after writing was checked due to window layout 
> (https://pasteboard.co/cYDUEmEr89ED.png).
> Nevertheless, on the Writing media screen, the text "This will delete 
> installation
> media from your drive" appears (https://pasteboard.co/ZJnHjfBj1Yvj.png). If 
> the
> Delete Download button was not active, this message shouldn't appear. If the 
> Delete
> Download was active, and I couldn't see it, the actual behavior is wrong 
> because the
> media was *not* deleted from my drive after the write completed.
> 

This all will be most likely a common issue, but I'm unable to see the 
screenshots and reproduce.

> 
> * Confirmed working: Write USB using Download Automatically method (Fedora 
> Silverblue
> 36).
> 
> * Confirmed working: Restored USB drive to full size in FAT32 format.
> 
> * Confirmed working: Write USB using Select .iso file method
> (Fedora-LXQt-Live-x86_64-35-1.2.iso).
> 
> * Confirmed working: Booted from USB drive (LXQt Spin) attached to KVM 
> virtual machine in
> BIOS mode and second install in UEFI mode. Installation completed 
> successfully and booted.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Fedora-IoT-37-20220506.0 compose check report

Re: Please help us test: Fedora Media Writer 5.0

Fedora-Rawhide-20220506.n.0 compose check report

Fedora-36-20220506.n.0 compose check report

Re: Please help us test: Fedora Media Writer 5.0

Re: Please help us test: Fedora Media Writer 5.0

Re: Please help us test: Fedora Media Writer 5.0

Fedora 36 compose report: 20220506.n.0 changes

Re: Please help us test: Fedora Media Writer 5.0

Re: Please help us test: Fedora Media Writer 5.0

Re: Please help us test: Fedora Media Writer 5.0

Re: Please help us test: Fedora Media Writer 5.0

Re: Please help us test: Fedora Media Writer 5.0

Re: Please help us test: Fedora Media Writer 5.0

Re: Please help us test: Fedora Media Writer 5.0

Re: Proposal: changes to "default application functionality" release criteria

Re: Proposal: changes to "default application functionality" release criteria

Re: Please help us test: Fedora Media Writer 5.0

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20220506.n.0 changes

Re: Please help us test: Fedora Media Writer 5.0

Fedora-Cloud-34-20220506.0 compose check report

Re: Please help us test: Fedora Media Writer 5.0

Re: Please help us test: Fedora Media Writer 5.0

Re: Please help us test: Fedora Media Writer 5.0

Re: Please help us test: Fedora Media Writer 5.0

Re: Please help us test: Fedora Media Writer 5.0

Re: Please help us test: Fedora Media Writer 5.0

Re: Please help us test: Fedora Media Writer 5.0

28 matches

Site Navigation

Mail list logo

Footer information